jilibet super ace
Unique opportunity for fast-tracked social integration, if only...Argentina economy seen shrinking 2.6% in Q3, but recession could breakNo. 18 Mississippi 89, Alabama St. 24
Under pressure Ange Postecoglou endured a torrid return to Scotland on Friday but watched his Tottenham team rescue a 1-1 draw with Rangers in the Europa League. In front of a hostile Ibrox home crowd, Rangers took the lead early in the second half from Hamza Igamane and the hosts look likely to pile more misery on Postecoglou’s side – with just one win now in eight games. The Aussie coach was furious at German international Timo Werner, hooking him at halftime and calling him out in the press conference post-match. “He wasn’t playing anywhere near the level he should,” Postecoglou said, when asked why he had withdrawn Werner at the break. “When you’ve got 18-year-olds, it’s not acceptable to me,” he said. “I said that to Timo. He’s a senior international, he’s a Germany international. In the moment we’re in right now, it’s not like we’ve got many options. I need everyone to at least be going out there trying to give the best of themselves. His performance in the first half wasn’t acceptable.” Dejan Kulusevski equalised on 75 minutes before Spurs were put under enormous pressure at the death, with Fraser Forster coming up with a huge save from Cyriel Dessers to preserve parity and Rangers having a goal chalked off for offside, also to Dessers. Rangers kick of second half with a bang ???? ↳ UEFA Europa League. Exclusive & Ad-free. Live & On Demand. #StanSportAU #UEL pic.twitter.com/yo6jVcNf1z The result left both teams where they started the night – Rangers in eighth and Spurs ninth on the same points, but was a thrill a minute. “What a game. Two teams going at it, not caring too much about defending at times. A wonderful game,” said former Rangers and Scotland striker Ally McCoist on TNT Sport’s coverage. Postecoglou, the former Celtic manager, has come under fire after a poor run of results has seen them fall to 11th in the Premier League table. Sections of the Tottenham fan base have voiced anger and levelled personal abuse at the Australian. A new era of the UEFA Champions League is here, only on Stan Sport. “I think Rangers played very well, we struggled a bit,” said Kulusevski “We didn’t play well enough to win the game. “I think Rangers played a perfect game, it’s a beautiful stadium, the fans helped them a lot. “I wanted to change something, to make something happen and I succeeded once but not enough today. “It’s always important to score but we’ve got to start winning games now. It’s time to win on Sunday. “Everybody needs to do a little more than we’re doing now.” Former Scotland forward James McFadden told the BBC that Spurs came into the game with the wrong mindset. “Tottenham were really poor in the first half. They did not have any energy. It looked like a lot of players thought they could turn up here and play however they wanted,” McFadden said. “However, Rangers showed them they are no pushovers. They controlled the game in the first half and should have been ahead. But they came out in the second half and got the reward for their performance. “There was a slight improvement from Spurs after the changes, but in the end they didn’t do enough. “A draw is a brilliant result for Rangers.” Tottenham travel to Premier League strugglers Southampton this weekend with all eyes on the embattled coach. Meanwhile, super sub Rasmus Hojlund’s brace has secured Manchester United a much-needed 2-1 comeback victory in the Europa League at Viktoria Plzen as Ruben Amorim registered his first away win as head coach. After making a promising start to life as Erik ten Hag’s successor, things were thrown off track by the shock exit of sporting director Dan Ashworth and back-to-back defeats to Arsenal and Nottingham Forest. Amorim was staring down the barrel of a damaging third straight loss early in the second half when ex-Burnley striker Matej Vydra put Plzen ahead after boyhood United fan Pavel Sulc cut out Andre Onana’s poor pass. But Hojlund’s introduction off the bench helped spark a turnaround in freezing conditions, with the substitute soon converting after Amad Diallo’s effort was blocked. The visitors continued to knock on the door and two minutes from time the Denmark international met a smart Bruno Fernandes free-kick with strength, a decent touch and a thumping finish. United’s first European victory on the road since March 2023 sees them take a giant step towards the knockout stages as attention turns to Sunday’s trip to stumbling Manchester City. United captain Fernandes defended Onana after his intended pass to Matthijs de Ligt went astray. “We want to play from the back,” said Fernandes on TNT Sports. “We have to make the decision that is the right one. Andre thought that Matty could get to the ball, he missed the pass, they scored a goal, but that’s nothing that we have to focus about. Man United get the lead with just two and a half minutes to go ???? ↳ UEFA Europa League. Exclusive & Ad-free. Live & On Demand. #StanSportAU #UEL pic.twitter.com/ayjpeg3skn “You have to focus on what’s the best solution that we can do it in the future, but it’s not about Andre making the mistake. We don’t look at individuals here when something happens in the wrong side or the good side. “We have huge belief in Andre. He knows he made a mistake, we don’t need to tell him, and he’s going to help us many times coming out from the back. We trust his qualities on the ball.” In other action on Thursday, Athletic beat Jose Mourinho’s Fenerbahce 2-0, Roma defeated Braga 3-0 while Union posted a 2-1 win over Nice. There were 2-2 draws for Malmo and Galatasaray and Lugogrets and AZ Alkmaar, while Olympiacos and Twente both couldn’t get on the scoresheet in their clash. PAOK thrashed Ferencvaros 5-0, where there were five different scorers, while Anderlecht beat Slavia Prague 2-1 away. Ajax were beaten 3-1 at home by Lazio, Porto defeated Midtjylland 2-0 while Bodo Glimt beat Besiktas 2-1. Lyon edged Eintracht Frankfurt 3-2, while Real Sociedad thumped Dynamo Kyiv 3-0. In the Conference League, Enzo Maresca’s high-flying Chelsea qualified for the last 16 with a 3-1 win over Estana. The head coach left at home all but one of the XI that started Sunday’s 4-3 win over Tottenham, but it did not stop an inexperienced second string easing to victory in temperatures of around minus 10.
Gone are the days when buying furniture meant endless store visits and tedious bargaining. In 2025, online furniture stores in India have revolutionized the way we shop for home decor, offering convenience, variety, and style at our fingertips. From modern minimalistic designs to handcrafted traditional furniture, these platforms cater to diverse tastes and budgets. Here’s our curated list of the Top 10 Best Online Furniture Stores in India 2025 that are transforming living spaces. Why Shop from Online Furniture Stores? Top 10 Best Online Furniture Stores in India 2025 1. Pepperfry Why It Stands Out: Pepperfry is synonymous with online furniture shopping in India. With a wide range of products and attractive discounts, it caters to every budget. Unique Features: Pepperfry Studios for a physical look-and-feel. Easy EMI options and free assembly. Best-Selling Products: Modular sofas, dining tables, and office furniture. 2. Urban Ladder Why It Stands Out: Urban Ladder is among the best Online Furniture Stores, who celebrate its premium quality and elegant designs. It offers furniture that complements contemporary aesthetics. Unique Features: Expert design consultations. Hassle-free delivery and assembly services. Best-Selling Products: Wooden beds, bookshelves, and recliners. 3. IKEA Why It Stands Out: Known globally, IKEA’s online presence in India brings affordable yet high-quality Swedish designs to Indian homes. Unique Features: Flat-pack furniture for easy transport. In-depth assembly guides. Best-Selling Products: Study desks, wardrobes, and kitchen cabinets. 4. Wooden Street Why It Stands Out: Wooden Street specializes in customizable, solid wood furniture that combines durability with aesthetic appeal. Unique Features: Custom-made designs tailored to specific needs. Lifetime termite-resistant wood warranty. Best-Selling Products: Coffee tables, TV units, and four-poster beds. 5. HomeTown Why It Stands Out: HomeTown is your one-stop stores for ready-made furniture, modular kitchen setups, and home decor items. Unique Features: Comprehensive interior solutions. Seasonal discounts and festive offers. Best-Selling Products: Dining sets, wardrobes, and mattresses. 6. Flipkart Furniture Why It Stands Out: As one of India’s leading e-commerce platforms, Flipkart Furniture provides a vast selection of affordable furniture. Unique Features: Verified reviews and ratings. Frequent flash sales. Best-Selling Products: Foldable chairs, compact tables, and bunk beds. 7. Amazon India Furniture Why It Stands Out: Amazon India offers an extensive range of furniture from reputed brands at competitive prices. Its quick delivery makes it a favorite among urban buyers. Unique Features: AmazonBasics furniture for budget-friendly options. Prime delivery for fast shipping. Best-Selling Products: Ergonomic office chairs, bedside tables, and bean bags. 8. Wakefit Why It Stands Out: While initially known for its mattresses, Wakefit has expanded into high-quality, minimalist furniture for modern homes. Unique Features: Scientifically designed products for comfort. 100-day trial on select items. Best-Selling Products: Memory foam mattresses, work desks, and wall-mounted shelves. 9. Fabindia Home Why It Stands Out: Fabindia Home combines sustainable, handcrafted furniture with traditional Indian designs, offering a blend of style and cultural richness. Unique Features: Ethically sourced materials. Timeless handcrafted designs. Best-Selling Products: Hand-carved chairs, ethnic wooden beds, and handcrafted storage units. 10. Snapdeal Furniture Why It Stands Out: Snapdeal provides affordable furniture options, making it ideal for budget-conscious shoppers. Unique Features: Cashback offers and deals. Lightweight, space-saving furniture. Best-Selling Products: Compact dining sets, shoe racks, and storage cabinets. How to Choose the Right Online Furniture Store Benefits of Shopping from Online Furniture Stores Wide Selection: Access diverse designs, sizes, and materials. Doorstep Delivery: Save time and effort with home delivery. Customer Support: Most stores offer round-the-clock assistance. Challenges in Online Furniture Shopping Delivery Delays: Sometimes products take longer to arrive than expected. Assembly Issues: Flat-pack furniture may require additional tools or expertise. Color and Material Variance: Items might differ slightly from images. Future of Online Furniture Stores in India The online furniture market in India is set to grow exponentially by 2025, driven by urbanization, technological advancements, and increasing consumer preference for e-commerce. Innovations such as augmented reality (AR) for virtual home setups and AI-powered customization will redefine the shopping experience. Conclusion: Redefine Your Living Space with These Online Furniture Stores The Top 10 Best Online Furniture Stores in India 2025 offer unparalleled convenience, quality, and variety, making them the go-to platforms for homeowners and renters alike. Whether you’re revamping your living room or setting up a new workspace, these stores cater to all your furniture needs while ensuring style and affordability. So, browse, compare, and create the home of your dreams—all from the comfort of your couch!It’s the Circle of Life at Disney — another boring sequel has been born. Actually, the lackluster “Mufasa: The Lion King” is both a sequel and a prequel to the 1994 classic that was already needlessly remade in 2019. The existence of this follow-up, somehow directed by Barry Jenkins of “Moonlight,” is similarly puzzling. Its origin story about how Simba’s pop came of age and ascended the throne is as thin as a reed but elephantine in pace. With so many look-alike lions who are hard to tell apart and repetitive action sequences that numb the noggin, you think, “Oh, I just can’t wait to be home!” Despite the nonstop peril, the cash grab remains a musical. The generically upbeat songs are by Lin-Manuel Miranda rather than the original’s Elton John and Tim Rice. That duo upended the House of Mouse’s 1980s and ’90s formula by composing pop hits rather than show tunes and got a smash in return. Miranda’s gentler tracks bop along in a manner more akin to children’s TV — albeit without earworms — for fear of being too frightening or funny. The numbers “I Always Wanted a Brother” and “Bye Bye” are cutesy, watered-down copycats of “I Just Can’t Wait to Be King” and “Be Prepared.” And since “Mufasa” is once again animated in that awful photorealistic style, we watch what appear to be actual, expressionless lions awkwardly sing these little ditties. The facial movements are a bit better than they were in 2019, yes, but still weird. The design is a technological feat, which makes it no less wrong for cartoon material. Shouldn’t these “Planet Earth” creatures be off killing gazelles? Legacies, more like. “Mufasa” begins in the future with a grown-up Simba (Donald Glover) and Nala (Beyoncé Knowles-Carter), who have a daughter of their own, Kiara (Blue Ivy Carter) . When Simba heads off in search of his wife, he leaves Rafiki, Timon and Pumbaa (John Kani, Billy Eichner and Seth Rogen, respectively) to babysit scared Kiara and tell her the tale of her late grandpa. The framing device — Timon and Pumbaa sing a parody called “Hakana Mufasa” and crack dumb jokes about the Broadway show — is twee as the rest. Its misguided inclusion is why this movie is a bloated two hours. Little Mufasa’s journey starts in earnest when a flood washes him far away from his non-royal parents to the clan of a king and queen, Obasi (Lennie James) and Eshe (Thandiwe Newton). Obasi hates him — “When we come upon an outsider, what do we do? Eat it!” — but Eshe and her son, Taka, want the tyke to stay. Mufasa (Aaron Pierre) gets older and becomes skilled at reading nature from the wind — a k a, there’s a herd of whatevers over yonder. Eventually, he ventures off with his adoptive brother, Taka (Kelvin Harrison Jr.), in search of the fabled land of Milele, a paradise where his new clan can be safe from the Outsiders, a fearsome group of white lions led by Kiros (Mads Mikkelsen). A bonus: maybe his parents are there, too. A pretty lioness Sarabi (Tiffany Boone) also joins the trek and puts a wedge between Taka and Mufasa, who she gets cozy with. Frankly, I couldn’t feel the love tonight. Jenkins does provide a few visual thrills, especially his fishbowl close-ups on Mufasa during chases. But they never feel like they belong in “The Lion King.” On this overstuffed ride, we also learn where wise Rafiki, royal aide Zazu, evil Scar and even Pride Rock come from. Who cares? The backstories only make us crave the peerless 2D original. In 1994, “The Lion King” was a big and bold risk for Disney. The film was a “Hamlet” riff that had no princesses or even humans; it wasn’t composed by hitmakers Alan Menken and Howard Ashman. The so-called “B-team” was on it. Obviously, the move paid off. In that film, the fallen Mufasa has some words for Simba that Disney should heed: “You are more than what you have become.”The CMA is about to release a provisional decision in its investigation into the cloud, but seems to have started with a fundamental misunderstanding of how customers buy IT, says Chris Hayman As the CEO of Rayo, a cloud and AI consultancy, and a veteran of the UK’s technology sector, I’ve had a front row seat to our nation’s remarkable journey in cloud. The UK’s light-touch regulatory approach and forward thinking cloud-first policy have propelled us to the forefront of the global digital economy. However, as the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) prepares to release its provisional decision as part of its investigation into cloud, we stand at a critical juncture that demands careful consideration. The success of cloud computing in the UK is undeniable. Analysis commissioned by my former employer AWS estimates that the economic impact of cloud computing in the UK accounted for over £42bn in 2023 alone. Looking ahead, research from Microsoft says that the UK could make more than half a trillion pounds in the next decade by fully embracing AI and cloud technology. If that all sounds like marketing spin look at the hard investment cash the UK is attracting: this year alone AWS committed £8 billion to the UK over the next 5 years, Google announced a £1bn data centre in Hertfordshire, and Microsoft heralded a £2.5bn AI infrastructure expansion. Or look at how, over the last decade, UK start-ups have raced ahead of their European counterparts in fundraising and hiring, or how the UK Government’s cloud native policy has helped propel it to the top of digital government rankings. The CMA, however well-intentioned, risks undermining this hard-won progress. I take issue with the regulator’s work on two fronts. First, they seem to have started with a fundamental misunderstanding of how customers buy IT. Cloud computing isn’t a separate market; it’s a delivery model for IT services, competing with traditional on-premises solutions. Or put another way it’s simply wrong to think that customers buy services like compute or storage from cloud providers like AWS, Microsoft, Google or Oracle, with no thought to what the same services might cost via other means. Compute is compute, whether you are renting in from someone’s else data centre, or buying it in a tin. Second, and more practically, I worry about the impact of the remedies the CMA have said it might want to impose. For example, the regulator says it’s concerned about the fees cloud providers charge some customers to move data. Today a small number of very large customers – think banks or online gaming platforms – pay these charges to cloud providers in order to move data around the globe. Most businesses will never transfer the amounts of data required to trigger these costs, which for most providers only kicks above 100GB per month, roughly the equivalent of sending over 1m emails every 31 days. While transparency is crucial, forcing cloud providers to eliminate these fees risks hampering investment in UK networking capability, or more likely pushing cloud providers to spread out these costs across all customers. Regulators wading in The CMA also appears to take issue with the discounts cloud providers offer. Going by the submissions the CMA has received, very few customers agree. Instead, they worry that the interventions considered by the CMA will make cloud services more expensive, especially for start-ups and scale-ups that rely on these cost efficiencies to fuel their growth. It could also slow the pace of digital transformation by making large-scale migrations less economically viable. Finally, the CMA appears to be toying with the idea of mandating interoperability between providers. While laudable in theory, I worry about a regulator wading into this space, with limited technical understanding, and inadvertently increasing costs for customers, and limiting choice. To be clear no customer I’ve ever worked with believed that switching providers for complex IT systems was pain free, but more often than not the underlining reason for this sat with the expertise assembled within that organisation. Most customers prefer to build an IT function that is specialised, even if this means it harder for them to change suppliers, because they believe they will get more out of their primarily suppliers as a result. I’ve not seen evidence so far from the CMA that there is something about cloud computing that adds additional complexity here, or that cloud providers are doing anything artificial or underhand to increase these costs. We will find out in the coming weeks how far the CMA intends to push these ideas when its provisional findings are published. When they are, I expect some pretty sensationalist headlines to follow, with some of cloud’s habitual naysayers out in force in response. But once the dust settles, and as the CMA considers its final recommendations, I hope it will alight on an approach that promotes competition among start-ups, SMEs and tech giants, without stifling the very innovation and investment that has made the UK a frontrunner in cloud. If like me you believe the UK’s future prosperity and security hinges on our ability to lead in the emerging AI revolution, we must build upon the success we’ve had with enabling technologies like cloud, rather than risk squandering our hard-earned advantage. Chris Hayman is CEO of Rayo
Verisign Stock Dips As Sen. Warren Reportedly Demands Probe Into 'Excessive' Pricing: Retail Shrugs It OffSocial media firms raise 'serious concerns' over Australian U-16 banSHAREHOLDER INVESTIGATION: Halper Sadeh LLC Investigates CCRN, ENLC, MNTX on Behalf of Shareholders
Bitget Becomes the First Exchange to Support VND Bank Transfer via VietQR
Unsettled weather with wet and windy conditions in store – Met ÉireannALABAMA ST. (2-5) Graham 0-1 0-0 0, Harris 0-6 2-2 2, Franklin 1-4 2-2 4, Smith 1-7 1-2 3, Tucker 2-8 1-2 6, Bryant 3-8 1-1 7, Pooler 0-2 0-0 0, Hall 0-1 0-0 0, Tavares 0-0 0-0 0, Gray 0-1 0-0 0, Jackson 1-3 0-0 2, Wofford 0-1 0-0 0, Totals 8-42 7-9 24 MISSISSIPPI (5-2) Jacobs 5-7 2-2 12, Scott 4-5 1-1 9, Deans 1-6 0-0 2, Sadler 2-3 0-1 5, Todd-Williams 4-7 2-2 11, Carrera 1-2 0-0 2, Collins 1-4 1-2 3, Gbemuotor 0-1 0-0 0, Iwuala 5-6 2-5 12, Richardson 2-4 3-4 7, Djalo 0-0 0-0 0, Noel 2-6 0-0 5, Thienou 6-9 3-4 16, Thompson 2-4 1-3 5, Totals 35-64 15-24 89 3-Point Goals_Alabama St. 1-15 (Harris 0-1, Franklin 0-1, Smith 0-6, Tucker 1-3, Bryant 0-3, Pooler 0-1), Mississippi 4-19 (Deans 0-5, Sadler 1-2, Todd-Williams 1-4, Richardson 0-1, Noel 1-3, Thienou 1-2, Thompson 0-2). Assists_Alabama St. 5 (Harris 1, Jackson 1, Smith 1, Tucker 1, Wofford 1), Mississippi 26 (Thienou 5, Todd-Williams 5). Fouled Out_None. Rebounds_Alabama St. 25 (Harris 5), Mississippi 43 (Jacobs 8). Total Fouls_Alabama St. 23, Mississippi 13. Technical Fouls_None. A_2,770.Percentages: FG .333, FT .759. 3-Point Goals: 3-15, .200 (Robinson 2-9, Corrigan 1-1, Bratcher 0-1, Jackson 0-2, T.Johnson 0-2). Team Rebounds: 1. Team Turnovers: 2. Blocked Shots: 5 (T.Johnson 3, Bratcher, Robinson). Turnovers: 32 (Robinson 11, Bratcher 7, T.Johnson 7, Jackson 6, Joppy). Steals: 4 (Corrigan 2, Robinson, T.Johnson). Technical Fouls: None. Percentages: FG .552, FT .704. 3-Point Goals: 16-37, .432 (King 4-9, Rideau 4-11, Porter 3-4, Smart 2-3, Parson 2-5, Adedire 1-2, D.Johnson 0-1, Ch.Daniels 0-2). Team Rebounds: 0. Team Turnovers: None. Blocked Shots: 3 (Adedire, Murray, P.Smith). Turnovers: 6 (D.Johnson 2, Ch.Daniels, Murray, Okworogwo, Parson). Steals: 21 (Murray 6, King 3, Porter 3, Rideau 2, Smart 2, Adedire, Ch.Daniels, D.Johnson, Okworogwo, Parson). Technical Fouls: None. A_145 (3,056).