Shares of SoundHound AI, Inc. ( NASDAQ:SOUN – Get Free Report ) saw an uptick in trading volume on Thursday . 38,257,907 shares traded hands during trading, a decline of 6% from the previous session’s volume of 40,647,559 shares.The stock last traded at $22.38 and had previously closed at $20.24. Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades SOUN has been the topic of a number of recent research reports. LADENBURG THALM/SH SH reissued a “neutral” rating and issued a $7.00 target price on shares of SoundHound AI in a research report on Wednesday, November 13th. HC Wainwright lifted their price objective on shares of SoundHound AI from $8.00 to $26.00 and gave the company a “buy” rating in a report on Monday, December 23rd. Barclays restated a “neutral” rating and set a $7.00 target price on shares of SoundHound AI in a report on Wednesday, November 13th. DA Davidson reiterated a “buy” rating and issued a $9.50 price target on shares of SoundHound AI in a research note on Monday, September 30th. Finally, Wedbush increased their price objective on shares of SoundHound AI from $10.00 to $22.00 and gave the stock an “outperform” rating in a research note on Monday, December 16th. Three equities research analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating and four have issued a buy rating to the stock. According to MarketBeat.com, the company has a consensus rating of “Moderate Buy” and an average target price of $12.07. Check Out Our Latest Stock Report on SoundHound AI SoundHound AI Price Performance SoundHound AI ( NASDAQ:SOUN – Get Free Report ) last released its quarterly earnings data on Tuesday, November 12th. The company reported ($0.06) earnings per share for the quarter, topping the consensus estimate of ($0.07) by $0.01. SoundHound AI had a negative net margin of 163.58% and a negative return on equity of 55.58%. The company had revenue of $25.10 million for the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $23.02 million. During the same period in the previous year, the business earned ($0.09) EPS. SoundHound AI’s revenue for the quarter was up 88.7% compared to the same quarter last year. As a group, sell-side analysts expect that SoundHound AI, Inc. will post -0.38 EPS for the current fiscal year. Insider Activity In other news, CEO Keyvan Mohajer sold 465,394 shares of the stock in a transaction dated Monday, December 9th. The shares were sold at an average price of $15.04, for a total value of $6,999,525.76. Following the transaction, the chief executive officer now directly owns 2,299,148 shares of the company’s stock, valued at $34,579,185.92. This represents a 16.83 % decrease in their ownership of the stock. The sale was disclosed in a document filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which can be accessed through this link . Also, CTO Timothy Stonehocker sold 34,407 shares of the firm’s stock in a transaction dated Friday, December 20th. The stock was sold at an average price of $20.30, for a total transaction of $698,462.10. Following the sale, the chief technology officer now owns 796,581 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $16,170,594.30. This represents a 4.14 % decrease in their position. The disclosure for this sale can be found here . Insiders sold a total of 2,782,918 shares of company stock valued at $45,391,343 over the last three months. Insiders own 12.28% of the company’s stock. Institutional Investors Weigh In On SoundHound AI A number of institutional investors have recently made changes to their positions in the company. Charles Schwab Investment Management Inc. lifted its holdings in SoundHound AI by 7.9% during the 3rd quarter. Charles Schwab Investment Management Inc. now owns 2,582,206 shares of the company’s stock worth $12,033,000 after purchasing an additional 189,109 shares during the last quarter. Carnegie Investment Counsel bought a new position in SoundHound AI during the 3rd quarter worth $4,193,000. Geode Capital Management LLC lifted its holdings in shares of SoundHound AI by 9.1% during the third quarter. Geode Capital Management LLC now owns 7,193,599 shares of the company’s stock worth $33,529,000 after buying an additional 602,311 shares in the last quarter. FMR LLC boosted its position in shares of SoundHound AI by 112.8% in the third quarter. FMR LLC now owns 49,038 shares of the company’s stock valued at $229,000 after acquiring an additional 25,989 shares during the period. Finally, Intech Investment Management LLC acquired a new position in shares of SoundHound AI in the third quarter valued at about $305,000. Institutional investors own 19.28% of the company’s stock. About SoundHound AI ( Get Free Report ) SoundHound AI, Inc develops independent voice artificial intelligence (AI) solutions that enables businesses across automotive, TV, and IoT, and to customer service industries to deliver high-quality conversational experiences to their customers. Its products include Houndify platform that offers a suite of Houndify tools to help brands build conversational voice assistants, such as Application Programming Interfaces (API) for text and voice queries, support for custom commands, extensive library of content domains, inclusive software development kit platforms, collaboration capabilities, diagnostic tools, and built-in analytics; SoundHound Chat AI that integrates with knowledge domains, pulling real-time data like weather, sports, stocks, flight status, and restaurants; and SoundHound Smart Answering is built to offer customer establishments custom AI-powered voice assistant. Featured Articles Receive News & Ratings for SoundHound AI Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for SoundHound AI and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .As their luggage underwent routine inspection, suspicions arose when customs officers noticed discrepancies between the declared items and the actual contents of their bags. Upon closer examination, a treasure trove of luxury goods was uncovered, including designer handbags, watches, and electronics far exceeding the allowable limits.
One player who can relate to Lewandowski's situation is the legendary Argentine forward, Gabriel Batistuta. Known for his lethal finishing, incredible work rate, and leadership on the pitch, Batistuta was without a doubt one of the best strikers of his generation. However, despite his incredible goal-scoring exploits and numerous titles won with Fiorentina and Argentina, Batistuta never managed to secure the prestigious FIFA World Player of the Year award during his career.
Quoin Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. ( NASDAQ:QNRX – Get Free Report ) COO Denise P. Carter acquired 555,556 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction that occurred on Monday, December 23rd. The stock was bought at an average cost of $0.45 per share, with a total value of $250,000.20. Following the purchase, the chief operating officer now owns 602,648 shares in the company, valued at $271,191.60. The trade was a 1,179.72 % increase in their ownership of the stock. The purchase was disclosed in a filing with the SEC, which is available at this hyperlink . Quoin Pharmaceuticals Stock Performance Shares of NASDAQ:QNRX opened at $0.55 on Friday. Quoin Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. has a 52-week low of $0.43 and a 52-week high of $6.18. The company has a market capitalization of $2.78 million, a PE ratio of -0.14 and a beta of 1.79. The company has a fifty day moving average of $0.68 and a 200-day moving average of $0.63. Quoin Pharmaceuticals Company Profile ( Get Free Report ) Further Reading Receive News & Ratings for Quoin Pharmaceuticals Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Quoin Pharmaceuticals and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .Furthermore, the new standard emphasizes the importance of documenting a pattern of abusive behavior over time. Rather than relying solely on isolated incidents, the accumulation of evidence over a period of time provides a more comprehensive picture of the dynamics of the abusive relationship. This not only strengthens the case against the abuser but also highlights the systematic nature of domestic violence, which is essential for developing effective intervention and prevention strategies.
Haryana govt amends CET policy removes bonus marks based on socioeconomic criteriaArticle content OTTAWA — The head of Canada’s diplomatic service briefed international envoys on foreign interference last month as the intense focus on the issue across the country created confusion among some diplomats about where their work might cross the line from influence into meddling. Recommended Videos David Morrison, the deputy minister of Global Affairs Canada, told The Canadian Press in an interview that there is a difference between interference and influence, the latter of which is the job of a diplomat. “The public inquiry and the coverage of it may have created some uncertainty,” he said. “Diplomats had legitimate questions as to where we draw the line in Canada, and we tried to be very clear on that.” The Liberals called a commission of inquiry into foreign interference last year following media reports and pressure from opposition parties. A final report is due by the end of January. An interim report released in May said foreign meddling by China, India, Russia or others did not affect the overall results of the 2019 and 2021 general elections. Commissioner Marie-Josee Hogue said it was possible — but not certain — that outcomes in a small number of ridings were affected by interference. In his interview on Tuesday, Morrison stressed that “Canadians can have absolute confidence in the integrity of our last two general elections.” During his testimony at the inquiry in October, Morrison mentioned he planned to brief diplomats about the matter, and he held that briefing on Nov. 21. Ahead of each of the last three federal elections, Global Affairs Canada sent what’s called a diplomatic circular, essentially a formal notice to all accredited diplomatic missions, outlining that Ottawa expects them not to endorse or finance any political parties or groups. At the Nov. 21 briefing, Morrison told foreign diplomats that they can publicly endorse or oppose a Canadian government policy, but they can’t spread disinformation to discredit a particular party or “undermine public confidence” in Canadian democracy. A slideshow shared at the briefing notes that concerns about interference since 2021 “are broader than only elections” and the “strained geopolitical context ... heightens vulnerabilities” for Canada, with its many diaspora communities. The slideshow encourages “overt engagement” with Canadians and officials, such as hosting events or taking a position on Canada’s national priorities. But it says that “clandestine influence” such as influencing a nomination race or running an online disinformation campaign is out of bounds, as is “clandestine, deceptive or threatening behaviour.” Also wrong would be “obfuscating foreign-state involvement in activities,” funding candidates directly or through in-kind contributions, and “deception meant to manipulate individuals in Canada.” Larisa Galadza, who helps run the department’s democratic resilience bureau, told foreign diplomats that more public awareness of interference makes clear that it is important to avoid even the perception of crossing the line. Her speaking notes, which Morrison provided, say that Canada is “increasing our efforts to set expectations.” “This briefing is an indication of how seriously we are taking this issue,” Galadza’s notes said. She noted that “seeking to control or unduly influence members of a diaspora community” is unacceptable, and that immigrants have the right to be vocally critical of their homeland. Her notes say diplomats can lobby an MP but cannot “convey threats or offer rewards in exchange for their support.” And all of these activities, she noted, are just as unacceptable if done through proxies. Morrison said such communication is necessary, as the international agreements governing the roles of diplomats apply everywhere but aren’t consistently understood. “There’s a wide range of opinions as to what is influence and what is interference,” he said, noting some countries see the limit of what’s acceptable as measures beyond what Canadians would tolerate. “In some national contexts, interference is taken to mean monkeying around with ballot boxes,” he said. Morrison said the session started by “acknowledging that the definitions were not agreed, but that this was our home turf, and we wanted to make certain everyone understood the rules” in Canada. “We made it very clear that, having now given fair warning, if accredited diplomats engage in the kinds of behaviour that we described as being outside of the lines, they could expect to hear from us.” Global Affairs does not monitor the behaviour of foreign diplomats in Canada, but the department’s regional teams are in frequent contact with diplomatic missions and security officials alert the department whenever they find concerning activity. Morrison said his department uses a range of approaches to have foreign states understand Canada’s perspective on acceptable activity. While a formal summons gets media attention, the department can also call in an ambassador to meet with someone ranking from Foreign Affairs Minister Melanie Joly down to a junior desk officer, based on how serious the situation is. Global Affairs Canada can expel diplomats or close embassies abroad, but it can also try making its point in an informal chat at a cocktail reception. “The essence of diplomacy is to be constantly communicating and that happens classically in diplomatic circles at social events and dinners,” he said. In February, senior diplomat Weldon Epp testified to Parliament that the Justice Department and the RCMP have undertaken workshops with the Indian government, “to explain what our standards legally would be” for extraditing people to India for terrorism charges. “How India defines extremism or even terrorism does not always compute in our legal system,” Weldon Epp told MPs at the time. Looking ahead to the next federal election, Morrison said he’s most concerned about emboldened hostile states using artificial intelligence in their attacks. He particularly worries about deepfakes, which are spoof videos and images that can dupe people into thinking politicians said or did certain things they didn’t. “The foreign interference that we have seen is continuing to evolve,” he said. “Our defences against it will need to continue to evolve as well.”In the world of high-stakes day trading, one trader's bold move has paid off in a big way. With nerves of steel and a keen eye for market trends, this unidentified trader managed to rake in a staggering $138 million in a single day by going long on Chinese Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) and leveraging his position.