
WASHINGTON (AP) — As a former and potentially future president, Donald Trump hailed what would become Project 2025 as a road map for “exactly what our movement will do” with another crack at the White House. As the blueprint for a hard-right turn in America became a liability during the 2024 campaign, Trump pulled an about-face . He denied knowing anything about the “ridiculous and abysmal” plans written in part by his first-term aides and allies. Now, after being elected the 47th president on Nov. 5, Trump is stocking his second administration with key players in the detailed effort he temporarily shunned. Most notably, Trump has tapped Russell Vought for an encore as director of the Office of Management and Budget; Tom Homan, his former immigration chief, as “border czar;” and immigration hardliner Stephen Miller as deputy chief of policy . Those moves have accelerated criticisms from Democrats who warn that Trump's election hands government reins to movement conservatives who spent years envisioning how to concentrate power in the West Wing and impose a starkly rightward shift across the U.S. government and society. Trump and his aides maintain that he won a mandate to overhaul Washington. But they maintain the specifics are his alone. “President Trump never had anything to do with Project 2025,” said Trump spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt in a statement. “All of President Trumps' Cabinet nominees and appointments are whole-heartedly committed to President Trump's agenda, not the agenda of outside groups.” Here is a look at what some of Trump's choices portend for his second presidency. The Office of Management and Budget director, a role Vought held under Trump previously and requires Senate confirmation, prepares a president's proposed budget and is generally responsible for implementing the administration's agenda across agencies. The job is influential but Vought made clear as author of a Project 2025 chapter on presidential authority that he wants the post to wield more direct power. “The Director must view his job as the best, most comprehensive approximation of the President’s mind,” Vought wrote. The OMB, he wrote, “is a President’s air-traffic control system” and should be “involved in all aspects of the White House policy process,” becoming “powerful enough to override implementing agencies’ bureaucracies.” Trump did not go into such details when naming Vought but implicitly endorsed aggressive action. Vought, the president-elect said, “knows exactly how to dismantle the Deep State” — Trump’s catch-all for federal bureaucracy — and would help “restore fiscal sanity.” In June, speaking on former Trump aide Steve Bannon’s “War Room” podcast, Vought relished the potential tension: “We’re not going to save our country without a little confrontation.” The strategy of further concentrating federal authority in the presidency permeates Project 2025's and Trump's campaign proposals. Vought's vision is especially striking when paired with Trump's proposals to dramatically expand the president's control over federal workers and government purse strings — ideas intertwined with the president-elect tapping mega-billionaire Elon Musk and venture capitalist Vivek Ramaswamy to lead a “Department of Government Efficiency.” Trump in his first term sought to remake the federal civil service by reclassifying tens of thousands of federal civil service workers — who have job protection through changes in administration — as political appointees, making them easier to fire and replace with loyalists. Currently, only about 4,000 of the federal government's roughly 2 million workers are political appointees. President Joe Biden rescinded Trump's changes. Trump can now reinstate them. Meanwhile, Musk's and Ramaswamy's sweeping “efficiency” mandates from Trump could turn on an old, defunct constitutional theory that the president — not Congress — is the real gatekeeper of federal spending. In his “Agenda 47,” Trump endorsed so-called “impoundment,” which holds that when lawmakers pass appropriations bills, they simply set a spending ceiling, but not a floor. The president, the theory holds, can simply decide not to spend money on anything he deems unnecessary. Vought did not venture into impoundment in his Project 2025 chapter. But, he wrote, “The President should use every possible tool to propose and impose fiscal discipline on the federal government. Anything short of that would constitute abject failure.” Trump's choice immediately sparked backlash. “Russ Vought is a far-right ideologue who has tried to break the law to give President Trump unilateral authority he does not possess to override the spending decisions of Congress (and) who has and will again fight to give Trump the ability to summarily fire tens of thousands of civil servants,” said Sen. Patty Murray of Washington, a Democrat and outgoing Senate Appropriations chairwoman. Reps. Jamie Raskin of Maryland and Melanie Stansbury of New Mexico, leading Democrats on the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability, said Vought wants to “dismantle the expert federal workforce” to the detriment of Americans who depend on everything from veterans' health care to Social Security benefits. “Pain itself is the agenda,” they said. Trump’s protests about Project 2025 always glossed over overlaps in the two agendas . Both want to reimpose Trump-era immigration limits. Project 2025 includes a litany of detailed proposals for various U.S. immigration statutes, executive branch rules and agreements with other countries — reducing the number of refugees, work visa recipients and asylum seekers, for example. Miller is one of Trump's longest-serving advisers and architect of his immigration ideas, including his promise of the largest deportation force in U.S. history. As deputy policy chief, which is not subject to Senate confirmation, Miller would remain in Trump's West Wing inner circle. “America is for Americans and Americans only,” Miller said at Trump’s Madison Square Garden rally on Oct. 27. “America First Legal,” Miller’s organization founded as an ideological counter to the American Civil Liberties Union, was listed as an advisory group to Project 2025 until Miller asked that the name be removed because of negative attention. Homan, a Project 2025 named contributor, was an acting U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement director during Trump’s first presidency, playing a key role in what became known as Trump's “family separation policy.” Previewing Trump 2.0 earlier this year, Homan said: “No one’s off the table. If you’re here illegally, you better be looking over your shoulder.” John Ratcliffe, Trump's pick to lead the CIA , was previously one of Trump's directors of national intelligence. He is a Project 2025 contributor. The document's chapter on U.S. intelligence was written by Dustin Carmack, Ratcliffe's chief of staff in the first Trump administration. Reflecting Ratcliffe's and Trump's approach, Carmack declared the intelligence establishment too cautious. Ratcliffe, like the chapter attributed to Carmack, is hawkish toward China. Throughout the Project 2025 document, Beijing is framed as a U.S. adversary that cannot be trusted. Brendan Carr, the senior Republican on the Federal Communications Commission, wrote Project 2025's FCC chapter and is now Trump's pick to chair the panel. Carr wrote that the FCC chairman “is empowered with significant authority that is not shared” with other FCC members. He called for the FCC to address “threats to individual liberty posed by corporations that are abusing dominant positions in the market,” specifically “Big Tech and its attempts to drive diverse political viewpoints from the digital town square.” He called for more stringent transparency rules for social media platforms like Facebook and YouTube and “empower consumers to choose their own content filters and fact checkers, if any.” Carr and Ratcliffe would require Senate confirmation for their posts.MG has a storied history, and in recent years it has established a strong presence in the Australian market, primarily by selling cheap cars with mass-market appeal. or signup to continue reading It's currently ranked seventh in Australia's new-vehicle sales chart, and while it isn't on track to surpass its 2023 sales record, it's still a top contender with an ever-expanding local model lineup. MG's model range is being bolstered by the arrival of new and upgraded vehicles across a variety of market segments, which are serving to help the brand elevate itself up and away from its cheap-and-cheerful roots roots. Indubitably, it's cheap cars like the MG 3 hatch that come to mind when MG is mentioned, though the all-new MG 4 electric hatch, the long-awaited new MG 3 and subsequent renewals of other models like the HS mid-sized SUV and ZS small SUV are helping to shift perceptions – as is the arrival of the $100,000-plus Cyberster electric sports car. But MG as we know it now is just its latest iteration, and there's a lot more to the brand name than what's happened in only the past 15 years. Most car enthusiasts and anyone middle-aged won't be surprised to read MG was originally an entirely British manufacturer most notable for small sports cars loaded with charm. But did you know the MG name came from modifying another company's vehicles? Or that the brand established its historical sporting pedigree through motorsport success as long ago as the 1930s? Here we'll break all that down, including the factors that led to its eventual downfall in the early 2000s and its subsequent rebirth as a global automotive powerhouse under Chinese ownership. As the marque celebrates its 100th birthday, here's everything you need to know about MG. MG – specifically MG Motor – is headquartered in Shanghai, China, and has been owned by the Chinese state-owned carmaker SAIC Motor since 2007. Many will know the MG badge for its much older origins though, and there's plenty to unpack from its 100-year history. MG was established in 1924, when the first vehicles created by British car designer Cecil Kimber appeared in Oxford. Its origins aren't as clear cut as other carmakers though, because the brand effectively began as an unofficial spin-off of Morris Garages – owned by British motor manufacturer William Morris. Morris Garages was an automobile retail sales and service centre in Oxford, where Mr Kimber was hired as a sales manager in 1921 and promoted to general manager in 1922. He went on to become the founder of MG. He began by modifying the standard production Morris Oxford, a model that had been in production since 1913. Mr Kimber's modified versions were dubbed Kimber Specials, and they featured both Morris and MG badges. A reference to MG with its iconic octagon badge first appeared in a local newspaper in late 1923, and the symbol was later registered as a trademark by Morris Garages in 1924. In the same year, the MG 14/28 appeared as the company's first recognised model, and in 1925 the MG Old Number One went on sale. Continued expansion over the coming years led to Morris Garages moving to several new locations, until a facility near the main Morris factory in Cowley, Oxford became its home in 1927. That factory provided the company its first opportunity to employ an actual production line. MG continued to grow and by 1928 it was large enough to warrant the establishment of an identity separate to the original Morris Garages, and so it was subsequently dubbed the M.G. Car Company in March 1928 – a name derived from its origins. 1928 also saw the launch of the first MG model that wasn't a modified Morris, the MG 18/80. In October of that year it hosted its first exhibit at the London Motor Show, followed by another necessary relocation to a larger factory in Abingdon, Oxfordshire in 1929. In that year, it launched the first in a long line of its iconic sporty Midgets, the Morris-derived M-Type. The official M.G. Car Company was incorporated on July 21, 1930. It soon rolled out several small T-Series models that were later exported worldwide following World War II. Those cars achieved unexpectedly high success thanks to models like the MG TC, TD, and TF – all of which were based on the pre-war MG TB. Throughout the 1930s, MG also began enjoying success in motorsport after toppling British giants like Bentley. Mr Kimber stayed with the company as its managing director until 1935, when Mr Morris – who was still the company's main shareholder – formally sold the M.G. Car Company to Morris Motors, which meant Mr Kimber was no longer the sole controlling owner. In the coming years the outbreak of WWII halted car production at MG, but it continued making basic items for the British army until Mr Kimber controversially obtained a contract to work on aircraft. He did so without prior approval, which led to company executives asking him to resign. He left in 1941 and soon found work elsewhere, though he was tragically killed in a railway accident at London's King's Cross station in 1945. In 1952, the M.G. Car Company and Morris were absorbed into the British Motor Corporation (BMC), which was created through a merger between Morris Motors and the Austin Motor Company. MG soon departed from its earlier pre-war designs to release the MGA in 1955. It was later followed by the iconic MGB in 1962, in response to demand for a more modern and comfortable sports car. From 1967 to 1969 a short-lived MGC was produced, which was based on the MGB but featured a larger, heavier six-cylinder engine and noticeably worse handling. Aside from those small sports cars though, many of MG's cars under BMC were simply badge-engineered versions of models from other marques. One such car was the MG Midget of 1961, which was a rebadged and slightly restyled Austin-Healey Sprite. In 1966, BMC merged with Jaguar Cars to form British Motor Holdings (BMH), which itself merged with the Leyland Motor Corporation in 1968 to form the British Leyland Motor Corporation (BLMC). From the early 1970s under BLMC, the M.G. Car Company name disappeared and the MG marque began to only be used for rebadged models from BLMC's other brands. The exception was the unsuccessful MGB GT V8, which was only in production from 1973 to 1976. While both the MGB and Midget designs were frequently modified to keep up to date with changing safety regulations, primarily in the United States, those two popular models were becoming outdated under BLMC ownership. MG's step back during this period was largely caused by BLMC, later British Leyland, whose management and engineering staff were predominantly carried over from the former Leyland organisation. That was unfortunate for MG, as the Leyland company previously incorporated Triumph – its historically close rival. In fact, while Triumph was able to release new models during the 1970s like the TR7 and Dolomite, no new MG models were introduced except for that short-lived V8 MGB. Several distinct tiers emerged at British Leyland, with Triumph, Rover and Jaguar bundled into its Specialist Division, while MG was placed in the Austin-Morris division that generally made mass-produced family cars. Despite its lower status, MG proved to be profitable, though its profits were offset by substantial losses mounting from the rest of the Austin-Morris division. That meant any funding allocated to the division by British Leyland was diverted away from MG and instead to desperately needed mass-market models. That left MG with limited funding to maintain its tired lineup, let alone develop new models. The Abingdon plant closed as a result (bringing with it the death of the MGB and Midget), and in the 1980s MG returned to being used for badge-engineering Austin Rover models like the Metro, Maestro, and Montego. It wasn't until 1992 that the MG marque reappeared in its own right, with the MG RV8 – an updated MGB Roadster with a V8 engine from Rover – previewed at that year's Birmingham Motor Show. It entered low-volume production in 1993. That car was followed by the MG F in 1995, which was the first mass-produced all-new MG sports car since the death of the MGB in 1980. By that point, MG ownership had shifted hands multiple times. British Leyland became the Rover Group in 1986, which led to the MG marque being passed to British Aerospace in 1988 and then BMW in 1994. BMW sold the business in 2000, when the MG marque was passed on to the MG Rover Group based at the historic car factory in Longbridge, Birmingham. MG's own sports cars continued to be sold alongside rebadged Rovers, and the lineup included the models like the MG ZS small sedan (a rebadged Rover 45) and the Rover 75 mid-sized sedan, both of which were sold in Australia in the mid-2000s. In 2005, the overarching MG Rover Group entered administration with £1.4 billion (~A$2.7 billion) in debt, and car production was suspended on April 7, 2005. Interestingly, the group wasn't formally dissolved until May 2023. China had entered the MG picture as early as 2004, when reports of a joint venture between SAIC and MG Rover led to speculation from British media that a takeover was imminent. That initial venture fell through, and SAIC denied it had tried to purchase the company. In July 22, 2005, Nanjing Automobile Group purchased the rights to MG along with the MG Rover Group's other assets, but it couldn't acquire the Rover name from BMW and thus created Roewe. The company formed was titled NAC MG UK, and Nanjing Automobile later merged with SAIC Motor in 2007. Earlier in 2007 though, Nanjing had restarted MG production, which saw sports cars like the MG TF manufactured at Longbridge from 2008 to 2010. The company was renamed to MG Motor UK in 2009, and MG continues to be controlled by SAIC to this day. The first all-new MG in 16 years hit the market in the form of the MG 6 in 2011 – though it was derived from the SAIC-owned Roewe 550 and was thus distantly related to the Rover 75, which ended production in 2005. It was built both in China and in the United Kingdom at Longbridge, and was followed by the MG 3 in 2013. MG Motor ended production at the Longbridge plant in September 2016. MG vehicles have been primarily built in China ever since – with the exception of localised operations in countries like Thailand and India. SAIC has since designated MG as its main international brand, and it became China's largest single-marque car exporter in 2019. MG Motor went on to sell around 840,000 units globally in 2023, when 88 per cent of its sales were outside of China. Apart from of SAIC-developed MG models, MG Motor also sells rebadged versions of other vehicles from SAIC-owned brands like Roewe (successor to Rover) and Maxus (founded by SAIC in 2011). One such vehicle is the second-generation MG HS, which is a rebadged version of the Chinese-market Roewe RX5. The new HS was released in 2024, alongside new-generation versions of the MG 3 and ZS, replacing Australia's top-selling light car and small SUV, respectively. MG Motor has also since released its first roadster under Chinese ownership, the battery-electric Cyberster. Between 2020 and 2023, MG was one of the fastest-growing brands in the UK and Europe, and during the same period its Australian sales quadrupled. Its most popular global model continues to be the ZS, while MG's sales were boosted by the arrival of its first electric vehicle (EV) developed from the ground up – the MG 4 in 2022. In 2023, China was MG Motor's largest market with 99,441 sales. It was followed by the UK with 81,289, Mexico with 60,128, and Australia with 58,346. MG currently sells six distinct models in Australia, though there are several caveats. Prices for the MG 3, 4, and 5 are all as-listed, though specific drive-away pricing for the MG 4 range is only listed for the base-spec Excite 51. It's also worth noting there are currently several factory bonus deals available, which bring discounts for models like the ZS EV – check for more details. There are also several ZS models, which can be explained as standard (ZS), updated and restyled (ZST), electric (ZS EV), and new-generation (ZS Hybrid+) – the latter of which is hitting showrooms this month and will be followed by new petrol versions early next year. The HS and 3 are now officially in their second-generation guises, while the all-new Cyberster has only just arrived in Australia and will go on sale next month. While the HS and 3 are two models that received significant updates this year, you can still purchase new previous-generation versions of both models while stocks last. The is currently discounted through MG's run-out sale for $19,990 drive-away, alongside the for either $28,990 drive-away or $30,990 drive-away depending on the variant. Similarly, the outgoing HS Plus EV plug-in hybrid is on sale for either $34,990 drive-away or $37,990 drive-away. We'll now provide a top-line overview of each of the new and incoming models, though it's worth checking out our individual price and specs articles for detailed information. These will be linked to the model's name below. The is the brand's smallest model, and it's available as either a standard petrol variant or the electrified Hybrid+. Each employ a 1.5-litre four-cylinder engine, and non-hybrids get a continuously variable transmission (CVT) compared to the 'hybrid' transmission in the Hybrid+. Drive is sent to the front wheels only. It's a similar story with the , though its higher-spec version adds a turbocharger and a dual-clutch transmission to its 1.5-litre four-cylinder petrol engine. Lower grades utilise a CVT, and all are front-wheel drive. A has been revealed in China, and it'll likely arrive in Australia early next year. As for MG's SUVs, there are currently two in the lineup. The smallest of the pair is the ZS, which has been on sale for some time and has just been released in next-generation Hybrid+ form. The only has one variant available, which utilises a 1.5-litre four-cylinder engine and a four-speed torque converter transmission. It's front-wheel drive only. Above that is the , which is updated and restyled compared to the standard ZS. It's front-wheel drive only and there are four variants; the bottom two use a 1.5-litre four-cylinder mated with a CVT, while the top two gain a 1.3-litre turbo three-cylinder and a six-speed torque converter automatic. The new-gen is arriving this month in two variants, both with a 1.5-litre four-cylinder engine. That's mated with a three-speed motor-assisted hybrid transmission, with drive again sent to the front wheels only. There's also the , which is now in its second generation. It's sold in three variants, and all use a 1.5-litre turbo four-cylinder mated with a seven-speed dual-clutch automatic. MG's EV range also includes SUVs with the , which is sold in three variants. The two cheapest variants utilise a 50.3kWh battery pack for 320km of WLTP range, while the top-spec Long Range gains a 72kWh unit for a claimed range of 440km. Then there's the dedicated-electric , Australia's cheapest EV, that is sold in five variants. The base Excite 51 is the only one to use a 51kWh battery for a claimed range of 350km, while the next two up use a 64kWh battery for ranges of 450km and 435km respectively. The Long Range 77 has a 77kWh battery pack and a claimed range of 530km, and all are rear-wheel drive. The odd one out is the XPower at the top of the range, which has a dual-motor all-wheel drive setup, a 64kWh battery, and 400km of driving range. Finally, MG Motor's most unique global car to date is the all-electric . It's coming to Australia in one all-wheel drive variant, and it's the most expensive car MG has ever brought here. The scissor-door convertible utilises a 77kWh battery pack for a claimed range of 443km, while MG says it can reach 0-100km/h in just 3.2 seconds. MG is primarily competing against auto brands that sell similarly affordable cars in Australia, namely Chery, GWM, Suzuki, Mitsubishi, and – at a stretch – Mazda. Firstly Chery, as it's another Chinese brand competing in similar Australian market segments. Its and are strong rivals for the ZST and ZS respectively, largely due to their price and size. The entry-level Omoda 5 FX is priced at $27,990 drive-away, compared to the ZST Core's $26,990 drive-away price tag. On the cheaper end, the Tiggo 4 Pro costs as little as $23,990 drive-away, while the ZS is priced from $20,990 drive-away. In terms of larger SUVs, the closest matched vehicles are the ($39,990 drive-away) and the MG HS ($34,990 drive-away). GWM – another Chinese manufacturer – competes against MG's SUVs with its Haval-branded and models, while the is also a strong rival for the MG 4. The MG 3 is MG's cheapest and smallest car, therefore making it a rival for the . There are some differences though – the MG 3 is cheaper than the Swift Hybrid, and the cheapest Swift Hybrid offers a manual transmission instead of a CVT. Mitsubishi's small SUV goes up against the ZS on price in particular, while its larger models like the and can also be compared to the HS in size and price – though the HS wins out on standard tech. Mazda isn't a direct rival for MG, though its smaller and older models like the and would likely be cross-shopped against the MG 3 (MG 5 in sedan guise) and ZS respectively. The key difference is Mazda's cheapest models tend to offer a slightly higher level of luxury (albeit without being legitimately luxurious) than comparable MGs. Similarly, the Cyberster doesn't currently have any direct competitors, given its unique positioning as an all-electric high-performance roadster. MG is currently Australia's seventh-best selling auto brand, sandwiched between Mitsubishi in sixth and Isuzu in eighth. Against the above rivals on yearly sales to the end of October this year, MG (41,302) ranks considerably higher than both Chery (8956) and Suzuki (17,670), though there's a much smaller gap to GWM (35,143). It's still well behind Mazda (81,143) and Mitsubishi (62,588), the latter of which is currently enjoying a year-to-date sales increase of a sizeable 20.1 per cent. MG, meanwhile, is currently down 15.6 per cent on its figure from this time last year. That means MG is on track to fall short of its record sales figure of 58,346 in 2023, if it maintains October's monthly sales of 5206 for the rest of the year. It is, however, only around 8000 units down on its 2022 sales figure of 49,582. MG remains Australia's top-selling Chinese brand, with GWM currently its closest rival on the charts. The brand's best-selling model here is the ZS, which has found 18,668 new homes so far this year. It's worth noting that figure combines sales of the ZS, ZST, and ZS EV. It's followed by the MG 3 on 10,421, but after that is a sizeable gap to the MG 4, its second most popular model with 5258 sales. Making up the rest of the total are the HS and MG 5 with 3530 and 3425 sales respectively. Interestingly, both the ZS and MG 4 made the sales top 20 for the month of October this year. The ZS ranked 11th, ahead of cars like the and , while the MG 4 was 16th and ahead of the and . MG has multiple new models on the way in 2025 alone, following the launch of several others in late 2024. The two recently launched new models are the and the , which will be on sale shortly. The next new MG expected to arrive here is the , which entered production in China in 2022. It'll fill the large sedan space currently unoccupied by MG, whose only current sedan is the smaller MG 5. On that note, an is expected to arrive at a similar time to the MG 7, and it's expected to improve the current model's ANCAP safety rating. Next up is the , which is expected to arrive in the first half of 2025. Though it follows the Hybrid+ version, it'll feature the same design and bring the rest of the ZS range into the current generation. Similarly, a replacement for the ZS EV is expected to arrive in first half of next year – though it'll likely look different to the new ZS and more like the spied in Australia earlier this year. Unlike the MG 3-based ZS, the S5 will share its platform with the MG 4. Another MG 4-influenced car is the , which is another electric SUV but appears to be closer in size to the HS. The current Marvel R has been sold overseas for some time, but never in Australia. The second-generation version is expected to arrive in local showrooms in the first half of 2025. As MG's largest SUV, however, the HS is expected to gain in mid-2025. They'll join the latest petrol HS, which itself arrived in Australia earlier this year. MG is also looking to bring to Australia in the future, and – like the HS – it's expected to be a rebadged SUV from fellow SAIC brand Roewe. In this case it'll be the RX9, but timing is unconfirmed. While MG has confirmed the RX9 for the Philippines, it may need a different name in Australia given Mazda owns the rights to the RX-9 trademark here. Content originally sourced from: Advertisement Sign up for our newsletter to stay up to date. We care about the protection of your data. Read our . Advertisement
RapidTranslate.org Centralizes Language Resources and Expands Certified Translation Services GloballyConsortium withdraws bid to acquire majority stake in Engro Powergen Qadirpur
Once the celebrities had tucked into a feast, thanks to Maura Higgins and Reverend Richard Coles winning 12 portions of food in ‘Terrifying Teddy Bears’ Picnic’, the first argument of the series took place between Dean McCullough and Corrie's Alan Halsall. Dean had to be woken up by Alan from his sleep as the campmates needed wood for the fire, which Jane Moore needed help carrying - due to current roles in the camp, Dean was the only person who was allowed to do it. But a hesitant Dean accused Alan of saying he "didn't fancy it" when instead, he just "needed a minute" to sort his contact lenses. Your votes mean Coleen and Dean are about to have a trucking terrifying time when they face Absolute Carnage ⚠️ #ImACeleb pic.twitter.com/Q9PcJ3SwF1 In response to this, I'm a Celebrity fans have slammed Dean for being "aggressive" towards Alan. One said on X: "nah but there was no need for Dean to go off at Alan like that #ImACeleb" Another wrote: "Dean and this aggression??? Don’t speak to Alan like that #imaceleb" Someone posted: "Omg is dean serious?! Alan couldn’t of been nicer when trying to wake him up! #imaceleb" This person agreed: "what was actually wrong with what alan said to dean?? he was being so gentle with him like huh ?? #imaceleb" Did you see this argument between Dean and Alan? (Image: ITV) This user noticed: "dean didn’t even go straight down to get the wood he went down to argue with alan?? #imaceleb" "Protect Alan at all costs," hailed an ITV viewer. Elsewhere, Wayne Rooney has encouraged I'm a Celebrity viewers to vote for his wife Coleen to do a trial as he feels she would want to “put herself to the test”. The former England footballer, 39, said he was “proud” of how Coleen was doing in the Australian jungle in a post on social media on Saturday. (function (d, s, n) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; js = d.createElement(s); js.className = n; js.src = "//player.ex.co/player/a5bdf049-8774-4ded-a60a-5688cea4a8f9"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); js.setAttribute('programmatic', 'true'); js.onload = function () { const playerApi237931 = ExCoPlayer.connect('a5bdf049-8774-4ded-a60a-5688cea4a8f9'); playerApi237931.init({ "autoPlay": false, "mute": true, "showAds": true, "playbackMode": "play-in-view", "content": { "playFirst": [ { "title": "How much is Ant and Dec's net worth?", "src": "https://large-cdn.ex.co/transformations/production/3dac3c05-257d-45d2-b760-c1524f8b72f3/720p.mp4" } ], "playlistId": "649d33682e5cf6001258ca95" }, "sticky": { "mode": "persistent", "closeButton": true, "pauseOnClose": true, "desktop": { "enabled": false, "position": "bottom-right" }, "mobile": { "enabled": false, "position": "upper-small" } }}); }; }(document, 'script', 'exco-player')); The couple, who first met at school and began dating aged 16, share four sons – Kai Wayne, Klay Anthony, Kit Joseph and Cass Mac. Recommended reading: “Proud of @ColeenRoo on @imacelebrity she’s doing great”, he wrote on X, alongside a collage of photos of her on the show. “Me and the boys would love to see her doing a trial and we know she’d want to put herself to the test. “If you can download the #ImACeleb and let’s get voting!” I'm a Celebrity continues on ITV1 and ITVX from 9pm on Sunday, November 24.Jeff Stelling has compared telly pal Matt Le Tissier to barmy conspiracy theorist David Icke. Former host Icke has made a raft of bonkers claims for years including that there is an inter-dimensional race of reptilian beings which have hijacked the Earth. And Jeff reckons former ace Le Tiss spouting controversial opinions online - including - might have cost him his job on Soccer Saturday. The presenter also said the cull at Sports that saw pundits including Phil Thompson and Charlie Nicholas axed was “like a scene from Platoon”. Jeff, 69, admitted he feared something was up when Phil phoned him and said he and Charlie were facing a meeting with a top boss. He revealed: “Moments after I put the phone down to Thommo, I knew what the fate of my mates was going to be. “My mobile buzzed again. It was Matt Le Tissier. ‘Hi mate, how are you?’ I asked. ’Well, I was ok until five minutes ago when Sky f***ing sacked me,’ he said. “Now Tiss had been extremely controversial on social media, particularly, but not exclusively, over Covid and there had been times on the show when I felt I was sitting next to the new David Icke. But I don’t have to share his views to get on well with him.” Jeff said that he worried that the whole panel was going to be fired - including himself - if Le Tiss was getting the chop. He continued: “He was a little more contemporary than Thommo and Charlie. If he was getting the bullet, so were they. “I rang Thommo back and let him know the news. All we could do was to wait for the inevitable. By 12 both had texted me one-word messages. ‘Sacked.’ “This felt like an out-of-body experience. How could they be dismantling a team that had been standard bearers at Sky for so long? “How could they do it without even talking to me about it? At around 12.15 my mobile buzzed again. “It was Gary Hughes, the head of football. Suddenly it dawned on me that this could be the call telling me I was finished too. I had been too worried about the boys’ fate and had not considered mine. But I was safe and so was Paul Merson.” Others out the exit door included reporter Geoff Shreeves, commentator Martin Tyler and ex-Liverpool player and pundit Graeme Souness. Jeff added: “Thereafter it was, as Merse would say, like a scene from Platoon as big name after big name fell on the broadcasting battlefield. David Icke had stunned reporters at a press conference in 1991 by announcing he was a “son of the Godhead” and claiming the world was going to end in 1997. In an infamous follow-up TV interview with Terry Wogan he doubled down and maintained: “The Earth will cease to exist.”TORONTO, Dec. 03, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- POET Technologies Inc. (" POET " or the " Corporation ") (TSXV: PTK; NASDAQ: POET), the designer and developer of the POET Optical InterposerTM, Photonic Integrated Circuits (PICs) and light sources for the data center, tele-communication and artificial intelligence markets, is pleased to announce that it has completed its previously announced registered direct offering with a single institutional investor that qualifies as an "accredited investor" under National Instrument 45-106 - Prospectus Exemptions of the Canadian Securities Administrators. The Corporation issued 5,555,556 common shares (the " Common Shares ") and a warrant exercisable to acquire up to 2,777,778 Common Shares (the " Warrants ") to the investor for aggregate gross proceeds of US$25,000,002 (the " Offering ”). The combined price of one Common Share and accompanying Warrant in respect of one-half of one Common Share was US$4.50 (or approximately C$6.29). The exercise price of the Warrant is US$6.00 (or approximately C$8.39) per Common Share, and the Warrant is exercisable for a period of five years from the date of issuance. The Corporation intends to use the net proceeds of the Offering for working capital related to its recently announced intention to expand assembly operations into Malaysia and for other corporate purposes. No commission or finder's fee was paid by the Corporation, and no underwriter or sales agent was engaged by the Corporation in connection with the Offering. The Offering is being made pursuant to a prospectus supplement dated December 3, 2024 (the " Prospectus Supplement ") to the short form base shelf prospectus (the " Base Shelf Prospectus ") of the Corporation dated September 6, 2024 filed with the securities regulatory authorities in each of the provinces and territories of Canada, as well as with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Corporation's U.S. registration statement on Form F-10 (" Form F-10 ") (Registration No. 333-280553) under the U.S.-Canada Multijurisdictional Disclosure System and General Instruction II.L, which included the Prospectus Supplement with such additions thereto and deletions therefrom as may be permitted or required by Form F-10. Copies of the Prospectus Supplement, including the Base Shelf Prospectus, are available on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov. The Offering remains subject to the final acceptance of the TSX Venture Exchange (the " Exchange "). This news release shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any state or jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such state or jurisdiction. About POET Technologies Inc. POET is a design and development company offering high-speed optical engines, light source products and custom optical modules to the artificial intelligence systems market and to hyperscale data centers. POET's photonic integration solutions are based on the POET Optical InterposerTM, a novel, patented platform that allows the seamless integration of electronic and photonic devices into a single chip using advanced wafer-level semiconductor manufacturing techniques. POET's Optical Interposer- based products are lower cost, consume less power than comparable products, are smaller in size and are readily scalable to high production volumes. In addition to providing high-speed (800G, 1.6T and above) optical engines and optical modules for AI clusters and hyperscale data centers, POET has designed and produced novel light source products for chip-to-chip data communication within and between AI servers, the next frontier for solving bandwidth and latency problems in AI systems. POET's Optical Interposer platform also solves device integration challenges across a broad range of communication, computing and sensing applications. POET is headquartered in Toronto, Canada, with operations in Allentown, PA, Shenzhen, China, and Singapore. More information about POET is available on our website at www.poet-technologies.com . Adrian Brijbassi [email protected] Thomas R. Mika, EVP & CFO [email protected] This news release contains "forward-looking information" (within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws) and "forward-looking statements" (within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995). Such statements or information are identified with words such as "anticipate", "believe", "expect", "plan", "intend", "potential", "estimate", "propose", "project", "outlook", "foresee" or similar words suggesting future outcomes or statements regarding any potential outcome. Such statements include, without limitation, the Corporation's expectations with respect to its products, the scalability of the POET Optical Interposer, the success of the Corporation's products, and the Corporation's use of proceeds for the Offering and the ability to obtain the final approval of the Exchange. Such forward-looking information or statements are based on a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions which may cause actual results or other expectations to differ materially from those anticipated and which may prove to be incorrect. Assumptions have been made regarding, among other things, management's expectations regarding the size of the market for its products, the capability of its joint venture to produce products on time and at the expected costs, the performance and availability of certain components, and the success of its customers in achieving market penetration for their products. Actual results could differ materially due to a number of factors, including, without limitation, the attractiveness of the Corporation's product offerings, performance of its technology, the performance of key components, and ability of its customers to sell their products into the market. For further information concerning these and other risks and uncertainties, refer to the Corporation's filings on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca and on the website of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission at www.sec.gov . Although the Corporation believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking information or statements are reasonable, prospective investors in the Corporation's securities should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements because the Corporation can provide no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Forward-looking information and statements contained in this news release are as of the date of this news release and the Corporation assumes no obligation to update or revise this forward-looking information and statements except as required by applicable securities laws. Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news release. No stock exchange, securities commission or other regulatory authority has approved or disapproved the information contained herein. 120 Eglinton Avenue, East, Suite 1107, Toronto, ON, M4P 1E2- Tel: 416-368-9411 - Fax: 416-322- 5075
“So there is no room for complacency, right?” “Right, the Man Who Must Remain Nameless and Faceless...” “The Third Wife’s entry into the politics of resistance has splintered the party...” “Wow, so different from what we hear on the airwaves, you reckon she is engaged not in politics but in the politics of resistance!” “Yes, leaders are forged in....in like a steel mill’s furnace – a furnace that epitomizes the degree of resistance – the hotter the furnace the more...” “Right, but you do know that our steel mills have been non-operational since 2015?” “Yes I do, but I am not sure, you know that all governments since 2015 have been releasing our tax rupees to pay salaries of the employees of the mills.” “And that has been the policy of the two bitter rivals – the PML-N and the PTI.” “And you know, the irony is that most of the employees of the non-functional steel mills are Pakistan Peoples’ Party loyalists and...” “Right on, there is a reason why they say Zardari sahib weighs more than all others.” “I assume that is figuratively speaking because I don’t know of a single member of the Nawaz Sharif clan who weighs less than Zardari sahib.” “Notification Maryam Nawaz (NMN)...” “Is more of an eye candy than Zardari sahib, but the buck stops there.” “The buck being the needle on the weighing scale?” “Speaking of a weighing scale, I know for a fact that NMN has disbursed 50 billion rupees to artificial intelligence researchers to produce a weighing scale that would show the weight that is in synch with the desire of the one who gets on...” “You being facetious?” “No, I wish NMN success – I have around three weighing scales in my house and not a single one gives me the weight that I know in my heart of hearts...” “Gotcha, but NMN gave this money that was collected from the Punjab taxpayers?” “Nope.” “She paid for it from her...her accounts or the salary she receives as the chief minister or...” “Well one thing is for sure: she didn’t receive funds from the retired Captain Safdar, anyway the money was not from her personal account but from the province’s share of the indivisible pool...” “It’s divisible pool, not indivisible pool.” “Not once it is credited to the Punjab treasury.” “You are bad!” Copyright Business Recorder, 2024
Scott Turner, President-elect Donald Trump choice to lead the Department of Housing and Urban Development , is a former NFL player who ran the White House Opportunity and Revitalization Council during Trump’s first term. Turner, 52, is the first Black person selected to be a member of the Republican's incoming cabinet. Here are some things to know about Turner: Turner grew up in a Dallas suburb, Richardson, and graduated from the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. He was a defensive back and spent nine seasons in the NFL beginning in 1995, playing for the Washington Redskins, San Diego Chargers and Denver Broncos. During offseasons, he worked as an intern then-Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif. After Turner retired in 2004, he worked full time for the congressman. In 2006, Turner ran unsuccessfully as a Republican in California’s 50th Congressional District. Turner joined the Texas House in 2013 as part of a large crop of tea party-supported lawmakers. He tried unsuccessfully to become speaker before he finished his second term in 2016. He did not seek a third term. Turner also worked for a software company in a position called “chief inspiration officer” and said he acted as a professional mentor, pastor, and councilor for the employees and executive team. He has also been a motivational speaker. He and his wife, Robin Turner, founded a nonprofit promoting initiatives to improve childhood literacy. His church, Prestonwood Baptist Church, lists him as an associate pastor. He is also chair of the center for education opportunity at America First Policy Institute, a think tank set up by former Trump administration staffers to lay the groundwork if he won a second term. Trump introduced Turner in April 2019 as the head of the new White House Opportunity and Revitalization Council. Trump credited Turner with “helping to lead an Unprecedented Effort that Transformed our Country’s most distressed communities.” The mission of the council was to coordinate with various federal agencies to attract investment to so-called “Opportunity Zones," which were economically depressed areas eligible to be used for the federal tax incentives. HUD is responsible for addressing the nation’s housing needs. It also is charged with fair housing laws and oversees housing for the poorest Americans, sheltering more than 4.3 million low-income families through public housing, rental subsidy and voucher programs. The agency, with a budget of tens of billions of dollars, runs a multitude of programs that do everything from reducing homelessness to promoting homeownership. It also funds the construction of affordable housing and provides vouchers that allow low income families pay for housing in the private market. During the campaign, Trump focused mostly on the prices of housing, not public housing. He railed against the high cost of housing and said he could make it more affordable by cracking down on illegal immigration and reducing inflation. He also said he would work to reduce regulations on home construction and make some federal land available for residential construction.
The brazen murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson has unleashed social media scorn at his company and a U.S. health insurance industry that serves as gatekeeper to the nation's $4.5 trillion health care system. Trying to file an insurance claim at UnitedHealthcare, among the nation's largest insurance companies, is a "humiliating and godawful slog," one commenter wrote. "Guessing this (murderer) might be a disgruntled policy holder.” Another poster complained, "CEOs are making money hand over fist- by DENYING care. I feel terrible for his family, but can’t say I’m surprised.” Although social media is often filled with hatred and “good riddances” after a high-profile murder, and there have been instances of violence against people involved in health care before, the reaction this time felt different, experts said. The Midtown Manhattan murder tapped a groundswell of public anger over an industry the public often only knows through impersonal delays and denials to needed health care, said Wendell Potter, a former CIGNA executive who became a whistleblower against the health insurance industry. "I've been hearing for years now from people who have been so frustrated because of denials or delays of care, and this was an opportunity for people to vent and to take out their anger against someone who just became known to them all of a sudden," Potter said. "It's sadly misplaced anger," he continued. " The system is rigged against Americans who need care, people who have health insurance, and it is largely because of the role that Wall Street plays in our health care system." Why are people so angry at the health insurance industry? Thompson's death also elicited an outpouring of vitriol on social media toward health insurers, grievances over denied claims and complaints about perceived greed in the industry. Investigators are still working to identify and locate the shooter who killed Thompson as well as determine a motive. Officials found three bullet casings inscribed with the words "deny,” “defend” and “depose," multiple news outlets reported. The words evoke the title of a book critical of the insurance industry published in 2010 : "Delay Deny Defend: Why Insurance Companies Don't Pay Claims and What You Can Do About It." Before President Obama’s signature Affordable Care Act took effect last decade, health insurers often denied or limited coverage based on a person’s medical history and retroactively canceled plans when a person became sick with a costly disease such as cancer. Such “rescissions” are not allowed now except when a person commits fraud or intentionally misrepresents facts. The 2010 health law mandated insurers spend a minimum of 80% to 85% of premiums on medical care, or rebate customers when they fail to meet those thresholds. But other consumer aggravations remain. Denied claims and trouble finding a provider in network work are among the most common reportedly problems faced by Americans that say they've had trouble using their health insurance, according to a 2023 poll from KFF, a health policy nonprofit. Problems with health insurance can be complex and confusing to navigate, which leads people to put off getting care and "could lead to very long term and detrimental health impacts," said Ashley Kirzinger, director of survey methodology at KFF. "We know that it causes a lot of anxiety for people," she said. Others say the private health insurance industry is a function of the design of the United States health care system. "Insurers get maligned for a lot of things that are really decided at a much higher level," said Loren Adler, associate director of Center on Health Policy at the Brookings Institution. "The way the U.S. set up our health system, it designates insurers to make the unpopular decisions on denying some care, having prior authorization and trying to control costs. And no one likes cost control." What is UnitedHealthcare's record on claim denials? UnitedHealthcare does not publicly report how often it denies claims or requires doctors, hospitals or labs to get the insurer's authorization before approving medical care. But lawsuits and Congressional reports provide some clues to the insurer's business practices In October, a Senate panel report found UnitedHealthcare’s denial rate for post-acute care "surged from 10.9 percent in 2020, to 16.3 percent in 2021, to 22.7 percent in 2022." Almost a dozen people were arrested in July outside UnitedHealthcare’s headquarters in Minnetonka, Minnesota, while "protesting the company’s systemic practice of refusing to authorize and pay for care," according to the People’s Action Institute . The organization offered condolences for Thompson's death in a statement . A 2023 lawsuit filed against United Healthcare, its parent company UnitedHealth Group and subsidiary NaviHealth claimed the insurance giant used artificial intelligence to deny claims for seniors enrolled in private Medicare plans. The lawsuit claimed seniors were denied access to skilled nursing and rehab centers and the insurer used AI to make "rigid and unrealistic" determinations about what it takes for patients to recover from serious illnesses. When the lawsuit was filed UnitedHealth told USA TODAY that NaviHealth's AI program isn't used to make coverage determinations. The case is ongoing. Claim denials or delays are both strategies that health insurance companies employ to limit the amount they pay in medical claims due to pressure from Wall Street, Potter said. When UnitedHealthcare's parent company, UnitedHealth Group, reported quarterly earnings in November, the insurer paid more in claims than Wall Street expected and warned of government payment cuts for private Medicare plans and low reimbursement from state Medicaid program. After the insurer lowered its forecast on financial performance for the next year, the company's stock price dipped 8%. "From the investors' point view, the company was paying too much for care, and the company was punished," Potter said. Health care workers face on-the-job attacks, violence Beyond anger directed at insurance companies, Thompson's death is the latest in a number of violent attacks and threats against health care workers, including doctors and nurses, and industry executives. Research has found health care workers are about five times more likely to experience workplace violence than employees in other industries and their risk of becoming gun violence victims is rising. Meanwhile, health care companies have shelled out hundreds of thousands of dollars to protect top executives as threats against them also rose. Unlike mass shootings where the perpetrator doesn't personally know the victims, attacks in health care settings are usually purposeful, targeted and often involve grudges related to medical or surgical outcomes, research has found. "The risk of workplace violence is a serious occupational hazard for nurses and other health care workers," a recent study by National Nurses United found . "Countless acts of assault, battery, aggression, and threats of violence that routinely take place in health care settings demonstrate a frightening trend of increasing violence faced by health care workers throughout the country." Holding a grudge against a physician for health outcomes is the motive in about 20% of fatal shootings involving health care workers, according to a study by Maine Medical Center researchers published in 2019 . Chris Pierson, CEO of security firm BlackCloak, said he's seen executives of Fortune 500 pharmaceutical companies become victims of swatting after raising drug prices as well as his own clients in the health care industry physically confronted by people attempting to hold them accountable for their company's decisions. While violence is rare, consumer aggravation with insurance companies is routine. Half of the people who reported issues using their health insurance either couldn't receive recommended care, experienced a decline in their health or paid more than expected all as a direct result of their problems, the KFF poll found. Though most people, particularly those in good health, say they're happy with their own insurance provider, "people are much more negative about the health insurance industry writ large," Kirzinger said. "With the increase in costs of health care, there's a lot of discussion of who's to blame for that and what's not getting covered," she said. Contributing: Christopher Cann, USA TODAY ; Reuters
Browns get 497-yard performance from QB Jameis Winston and lose anyway in season long gone sour
With the holiday shopping season in full swing, Bronx District Attorney Darcel Clark is calling on elected officials and business leaders to reassess how cannabis offenses and retail theft are prosecuted, warning that current laws fail to protect Bronx communities. In a Dec. 6 letter addressed to 12 local Business Improvement District (BID) leaders and elected officials, Clark argued that existing laws are too lenient, enabling crimes that harm small businesses. Clark argued that Bronx small businesses are fighting a losing battle against types of crime that pose a serious threat to their livelihood. The current laws “do not provide adequate protection for our community,” she said in the letter. The Bronx Times reached out to several recipients and is awaiting a response. When it comes to cannabis, Clark said the state’s Marijuana Regulation and Taxation Act of 2021 — aimed at reducing mass incarceration that has disproportionately affected Black and brown people — left a loophole that “[makes] it virtually impossible to prosecute any illegal cannabis possession and sale.” The loophole comes from the current law’s use of “pure weight” instead of “aggregate weight” in measuring cannabis. “Aggregate weight” includes the entire amount of cannabis seized by authorities, which could include fillers, as explained by a DA spokesperson. “Pure weight,” which is more difficult to quantify, only measures the amount that contains the high-inducing chemical THC. For instance, a bag of cannabis that includes stems and seeds would combine for the “aggregate weight.” Amid Bronx officials’ efforts to clamp down on illegal smoke shops, prosecuting under the current “pure weight” standard has let too many illegal cannabis dealers off the hook, in Clark’s view. She pointed to two Brooklyn cases dismissed because of the difference in standard and said she anticipates that the same will happen in the Bronx. Current laws may need to be tweaked to ensure that cannabis seized from unlicensed shops can be prosecuted, she said. ‘Collateral consequences’ Clark said retail theft is another “significant problem” because too many offenders are released and go on to commit more crimes. While 2020 reforms to bail and discovery laws were well-intended at righting some past wrongs in the criminal justice system, some had “collateral consequences,” said Clark. “Whether it’s the result of judges choosing not to set bail for offenses that involve harm to property, or because of the timeline and volume of discovery, retail theft is still a real problem,” said Clark. The DA’s letter said that hardworking local entrepreneurs are unfairly threatened by these issues and that she looks forward to “These business owners pay high rents, work long hours, and struggle to remain economically viable due in large part to illegal activities in surrounding areas,” said Clark. Reach Emily Swanson at eswanson@schnepsmedia.com or (646) 717-0015. For more coverage, follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram @bronxtimesSAN FRANCISCO , Nov. 22, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- RapidTranslate.org announces the strategic integration of three leading language resource platforms into its comprehensive translation services ecosystem. The company has partnered with Languages Without Limits ( www.languageswithoutlimits.co.uk ), Workshop on Immigrant Languages ( www.workshoponimmigrantlanguages.org ), and Arctic Languages ( www.arcticlanguages.com ) to enhance its educational and research offerings while maintaining these platforms' valuable existing resources. This integration coincides with RapidTranslate.org 's significant expansion into the European market, where the company now provides certified translations in over 60 languages across Germany , France , Spain , Italy , and the United Kingdom . This dual focus on educational resources and certified translations reinforces RapidTranslate.org 's position as a trusted global language services provider. Key Highlights of RapidTranslate.org 's Offerings: Comprehensive Language Support: Enhanced educational and research resources through the integration of three respected language platforms, serving educators, researchers, and language enthusiasts worldwide. Certified Translations: Professional translation services for official and legal documents, backed by a 100% USCIS acceptance guarantee. Global Reach: Expanded European presence supporting individuals, families, businesses, and professionals across key markets. A Leader in Certified Translations RapidTranslate.org delivers professional translations for immigration documentation, legal submissions, business contracts, and academic records. Every document is processed by experienced human translators to ensure linguistic and cultural accuracy. Services include: "By creating a centralized hub for both language resources and certified translation services, we're meeting the evolving needs of our increasingly connected world," says CEO and founder of RapidTranslate.org . "Our expansion into Europe represents our commitment to providing accessible, professional language services to a global audience." Supporting a Multilingual World RapidTranslate.org continues to advance its mission of fostering global communication through its combination of advanced technology and professional human expertise. With over 350,000 successfully translated documents and a growing repository of language learning resources, RapidTranslate.org remains dedicated to quality, security, and accessibility in language services. About RapidTranslate.org Founded in 2020, RapidTranslate.org has grown from a specialized translation service to a comprehensive language solutions provider. The company serves clients ranging from individual immigrants to Fortune 500 companies, maintaining the highest standards of accuracy and security in document translation while advancing language education and research. Connect with RapidTranslate.org : Website: www.rapidtranslate.org View original content: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/rapidtranslateorg-centralizes-language-resources-and-expands-certified-translation-services-globally-302314613.html SOURCE Rapid Translate