
The U.S. House Task Force on Artificial Intelligence has released its report on artificial intelligence following nearly a year of meetings and discussions with over 100 experts in the field. The task force, which included 12 Democrats and 12 Republicans, was charged with compiling a comprehensive "road map" for Congress to implement safeguards against artificial intelligence misuse and boost the development of artificial intelligence technology in the United States. "Artificial intelligence has the potential to enhance the lives of Americans, but it also poses serious threats – from fraud and identity theft to election integrity and more," said Colorado’s Democratic U.S. Rep. Brittany Pettersen, who sat on the task force. "After months of bipartisan collaboration, I’m proud to help release this report which will serve as a blueprint for Congress to enact policies that help harness the potential of this emerging technology while ensuring strong guardrails and consumer protections,” Pettersen said. “This report is an important step toward ensuring Congress meets the moment and the United States remains a global leader in AI." The 253-page report includes 66 key findings and 85 recommendations but does not propose any specific legislative measures. The task force adopted seven guiding principles when compiling the report that include: The task force investigated the use of AI in 15 areas, including government use, data privacy, national security, and intellectual property. Government Use The report encourages the federal government and Congress to be "wary" of algorithm-informed decision-making in government affairs. In addition, task force members recommended adopting AI standards for federal government use and improving cybersecurity of federal systems to protect against AI's negative impacts. "Irresponsible or improper use [of AI] fosters risks to individual privacy, security, and the fair and equal treatment of all citizens by their government," the report stated. Federal Preemption of State Law Several states, including Colorado, have passed legislation related to AI. According to the task force, the federal government can use these state-level statutes as a tool to "accomplish various objectives." However, "federal preemption presents complex legal and policy issues that should be considered." The report found that federal preemption has both positive and negative aspects and that it can allow states to be subject to certain limits on regulation. The task force recommended the federal government study the laws, rules, and regulations in each state when it comes to AI in different industries. Data Privacy "As AI systems amass and analyze vast amounts of data, there are increasing risks of private information being accessed without authorization," the report stated. "Thoughtful and effective data privacy policies and protections will support consumer confidence in the responsible development and deployment of AI systems." Currently, Americans have very few avenues for recourse if their privacy is negatively impacted by AI, but federal privacy laws have the potential to increase the effectiveness of state laws related to AI and data privacy. The task force recommended exploring ways to promote access to data in "privacy-enhanced" ways while ensuring any privacy laws that come out of Congress are "generally applicable and technology-neutral" to cover all forms of AI, current and future. National Security With many countries, including US adversaries, incorporating AI technology into their military programs, it's crucial for the American military to have a thorough understanding of different AI systems and implement them in its defense strategy, the report stated. The report called for expanded AI training within the Department of Defense continued oversight of autonomous weapons policies, and international collaboration with American allies on developing AI for military use. Research, Development, and Standards The task force recommends that Congress implement an open research environment in which research processes and data are accessible to all entities to maintain the U.S.'s status as a leader in AI research and development. The report found that further investments in AI research and development will increase competitiveness with American adversaries such as China and expand access to and adoption of AI technology among Americans. The report also called for promoting public-private partnerships for AI research and development and implementing standards for the evaluation and testing of AI technology. Civil Rights & Civil Liberties "AI models, and software systems more generally, can produce misleading or inaccurate outputs" that can deprive Americans of their basic rights, the report stated. The task force found that the federal government must understand the potential harm misleading or inaccurate AI systems can pose to mitigate potential rights violations. The report recommended always having a human available to identify and remedy potential flaws when AI is being used in "highly consequential" decisions and informing users when AI is being used in situations where decisions are being made to protect against discrimination. Education and Workforce According to the report, the U.S. has a "significant gap" in its workforce of AI-literate professionals, which is only growing. "Educating and training American learners in AI topics will be critical to continued U.S. leadership in AI technology and for America’s economic and national security," the report stated. As AI becomes increasingly common in the workplace, the task force recommended that the government invest in K-12 STEM and AI education to promote AI literacy and broaden pathways to the AI workforce. At the same time, the government should monitor labor laws and worker protections to ensure workers are not being taken advantage of when it comes to AI adoption in the workplace. Intellectual Property Generative AI has sparked widespread debates about intellectual property rights for creatives such as artists, musicians, and designers. "Generative AI poses a unique challenge to the creative community," the report stated, adding that creators are often unaware AI developers are using their work. The report recommends clarifying IP laws, regulations, and agency activity to better inform the legal community about what is and isn't legal and counter the increasing use of deepfakes to harm others. Content Authenticity When tackling inauthentic content such as deepfakes, the task force recommended a "risk-based, multipronged approach" in which the responsibilities of AI developers, content producers, and content distributors are clearly outlined. While the report found that synthetic content "has many beneficial uses," it can also harm individuals and create a sense of distrust among users. The report recommended ensuring victims of harmful synthetic content have access to tools and resources they may need for support. Open & Closed Systems The report also discussed open and closed AI systems. In an open system, an AI model's underlying code and data are publicly accessible. They can be built upon, while a closed system is only available to the developers. The report found that open models encourage innovation and competition among AI developers and that "limited evidence" exists that open models should be restricted. Despite this, the task force recommended the federal government continue monitoring open-source models for potential risks. Energy Usage & Data Centers The electrical grid has been significantly impacted by the advancement of AI technology, particularly due to large data centers with high energy demands. While the report found AI to be "critical" to U.S. economic interests and national security, it poses a multitude of challenges to the country's energy sector. "Planning properly now for new power generation and transmission is critical for AI innovation and adoption," the report stated, adding that AI itself can play a role in modernizing America's energy sector. Small Business Many small businesses lack the understanding and financial resources to implement AI, the report found. Providing them with education and resources to improve AI literacy is essential in order to help small businesses thrive, the task force stated, advocating for the federal government to reduce "compliance burdens" for small businesses that operate with the assistance of AI. Agriculture According to the report, AI technology has the potential to change the agriculture industry, increasing food availability, lowering food prices, and encouraging economic growth. Because many agricultural communities lack reliable internet connection, AI adoption in the agriculture industry has been slow, the report stated. However, increased AI use by the USDA could help provide more agriculture programs to American communities and reduce costs for farmers and ranchers. The report recommended the federal government direct the USDA to "better utilize" AI in program delivery and continue to explore how AI technology could help land managers improve forest health. Health Care AI has the potential to make significant improvements to the American healthcare system by improving diagnostic accuracy, streamlining operations. speeding up drug development and automating routine tasks, the report found. However, there currently aren't any uniform standards for medical data when it comes to AI, which makes it difficult for advancements to be made. The task force recommended the government "maintain robust support" for medical research related to AI and create incentives and guidance to encourage risk management of AI technologies in the healthcare sector, as well as developing uniform standards for liability related to AI issues. Financial Services According to the report, the financial services industry has been using AI technology for decades. "The ideal environment for continued growth would allow AI innovation to thrive while protecting consumers and maintaining market integrity," the task force wrote. "By focusing on fostering innovation, enhancing customer experiences, and ensuring financial inclusion, AI can significantly improve the financial sector's efficiency and accessibility." While AI has the potential to expand access to financial products and services, smaller firms may be at a disadvantage due to financial barriers to adopting AI. The report recommends fostering an environment where financial services firms can "responsibly" adopt AI technology and encourage industry regulators to gain a better understanding of AI while suggesting a "principles-based" regulatory approach. 'I don't want a future where China's leading on AI': Pettersen on the role AI plays in US government In an interview with Colorado Politics , Pettersen said the United States is in a race against China when it comes to crafting AI policy, and she's afraid China could win. "I really worry about areas like this where we need to be leading the way globally and making sure that China is not the one doing that,” Pettersen said. “I don’t want a future where China’s leading on AI. It needs to be the United States, and we have to come together in Congress to bring comprehensive, pragmatic, bipartisan solutions. It cannot matter (which party) has the majority. This needs to continue to be a bipartisan effort." Pettersen said she is confident artificial intelligence will remain a priority in the Trump administration but admitted that the Task Force on Artificial Intelligence faced some obstacles due to a "dysfunctional congress" and election season. However, she and other Colorado members of Congress agree that federal legislation on artificial intelligence is far more effective than "patchwork" measures passed at the state level. AI legislation in Colorado During the 2024 legislative session, Colorado passed a first-of-its-kind law that aims to address "algorithmic discrimination", defined in statute as any condition in which AI increases the risk of "unlawful differential treatment" that then "disfavors" an individual or group of people on the basis of age, color, disability, ethnicity, genetic information, race, religion, veteran status, English proficiency and other classes protected by state laws. Gov. Jared Polis has tasked Attorney General Phil Weiser with creating audit policies and identifying high-risk artificial intelligence practices to ensure the law is effectively implemented. The measure's prime sponsor, Sen. Robert Rodriguez, D-Denver, has promised to amend it during the 2025 legislative session to minimize any unintended consequences. Thelma Grimes contributed to this story.Dr. Manmohan Singh, a man whose name is etched in the annals of Indian history as one of its most transformative leaders, stands as a beacon of economic and social change. Born on September 26, 1932, in Gah (now in Pakistan), Singh’s journey from a brilliant economist to the Prime Minister of India is a story of dedication, resilience, and intellectual rigor. His early academic achievements laid a strong foundation for his future as a key policy maker. Singh’s advanced education at Panjab University, Oxford, and Cambridge in economics prepared him to navigate India’s complex economic challenges. Dr Singh credited with successfully anchoring the sinking ship of the Indian economy by ushering in bold economic reforms under Prime Minister P V Narasimha. It is in this backdrop.”No power on earth can stop an idea whose time has come. The emergence of India as a major economic power is one such idea,” he had said in his 1991 Budget Speech. Facing a severe balance of payments crisis and an economy on the brink of collapse, he implemented bold reforms that laid the foundation for the country’s economic transformation. Singh’s liberalization measures, such as dismantling the License Raj, reducing trade tariffs, devaluing the rupee, and promoting foreign direct investment, were revolutionary. These steps, though initially controversial, unleashed the potential of India’s economy, spurring growth and positioning the country as one of the world’s fastest-growing economies. Under his leadership, India witnessed unprecedented economic reforms that are often credited with changing the global perception of the Indian economy. Beyond growth, Dr. Singh’s tenure was marked by a profound commitment to inclusive development. His government focused on bridging the gap between economic growth and social welfare. The National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA), passed in 2005, provided 100 days of guaranteed wage employment to rural households, drastically improving livelihoods in India’s heartland, and Provided bedrock support during Covid 19 cricis. The National Food Security Act (NFSA) of 2013 further reflected his vision for an equitable society by ensuring subsidized food for over two-thirds of the Indian . Moreover, the Right to Education (RTE) Act, which made education free and compulsory for children between the ages of 6 and 14, ensured that the fruits of India’s economic success reached the most marginalized sections of society. In the political arena, Dr. Singh’s leadership was characterized by a steady and pragmatic approach to governance. Known for his calm demeanor and intellectual depth, Singh often navigated through turbulent political waters with grace. Singh was also instrumental in the passage of the Right to Information (RTI) Act in 2005, which empowered Citizens against State and made Govt Accountable and Transparent. His tenure as Prime Minister (2004-2014) saw India grow at an average annual rate of 8%, lifting millions out of poverty, even as he faced multiple challenges, from coalition politics to global economic crises. Yet, despite the controversies that often surrounded his government, Singh’s contributions to India’s rise on the global stage remain undeniable. As he once remarked, “I have no regrets,” his legacy as a key architect of modern India’s economic and social development endures, cementing his place as one of the nation’s most influential leaders. This recognition of his own contributions, however, has grown considerably in the years following his tenure. Addressing a press conference in January 2014, in what was one of his last media interactions, Singh had said, “I do not believe that I have been a weak Prime Minister ... I honestly believe that history will be kinder to me than the contemporary media or for that matter the Opposition in Parliament. Surely history is kinder to him. Adil Jameel , AA(P), Department of Rural Development and Panchayati Raj UT of J and K
In a surprising twist, it was reported that former Sporting Director Douglas Ashworth, who was let go by Manchester United, has already been in contact with Arsenal. Ashworth, known for his shrewd transfer dealings and strategic planning, is rumored to be considering a move to the North London club. This potential switch has added another layer of intrigue to the unfolding story at both Manchester United and Arsenal.
Eagles QB Kenny Pickett expects to be ‘ready to go’ vs. CowboysOn December 27, 2024, Information Analysis (OTCMKTS:IAIC) convened its Annual Meeting with notable outcomes regarding the voting results on key proposals. The record date for the meeting, based on November 15, 2024, reflected 8,503,365 shares of common stock that were issued and outstanding for voting purposes. Of these, 3,787,219 shares were either present in person or represented by proxy, thus constituting a quorum. One of the significant proposals involved the election of three Class I directors to the Board of Directors. The nominees, namely David DeCaprio, Jon Olsen, and Greg Lipschitz, received approval from the shareholders, with detailed voting results showing the affirmation of their appointment. Furthermore, a proposal concerning the approval of compensation paid to named executive officers on a non-binding, advisory basis was met with approval from the shareholders. Similarly, another proposal determining the frequency of holding a vote on executive compensation also received support, with the majority favoring an annual vote. In conclusion, the results of the voting at Information Analysis’ Annual Meeting reflect positive shareholder sentiment towards key decisions made by the company’s leadership. These outcomes are pivotal in shaping the future governance and strategies of Information Analysis moving forward. Furthermore, pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the report was duly signed on December 27, 2024, by Jon Olsen, the Chief Executive Officer of Information Analysis. This article was generated by an automated content engine and was reviewed by a human editor prior to publication. For additional information, read Information Analysis’s 8K filing here . Information Analysis Company Profile ( Get Free Report ) Information Analysis, Inc provides information technology services. The firm engages in the business of modernizing client information systems, developing and maintaining information technology systems, and performing consulting services to government and commercial organizations. It specializes in legacy systems modernization, ebusiness solutions, enterprise portals, system migration and re-hosting services, and enterprise application integration. Featured Stories