okebet com
Zimbabwe faces critical shortage of Blood Group ONone
ROSEN, LEADING INVESTOR COUNSEL, Encourages Unisys Corporation Investors to Inquire About ...Chandigarh shares data on three new lawsClinical Validation Of Ourself Delivery Technology Published In Dermatologic Surgery: Tiered-Release VesiclesTM Poised To Revolutionize Skincare
Reinventing Payments: Breaking Down Banking Infrastructure to Build a Composable FutureFor the 9th time in as many years, the Kansas City Chiefs have won the AFC West . But it was the first division title to come with a doink. The Chiefs defeated their division rival, the Los Angeles Chargers (8-5), with a last-second field goal, which bounced off the goal post and in, securing the win for the second time in three weeks. The final score was 19 to 17, the exact same score as the score between the Chiefs and Las Vegas Raiders last week on Black Friday. The 12-1 reigning champs have won 10 of their games by a touchdown or less, and haven't won a game a by more than seven points since October. Kansas City's nine straight division titles are two short of the New England Patriots' NFL record of 11. After the game, cornerback Chris Jones saw his team's close wins as a positive, saying they keep the team prepared for the playoffs. "We know that every game is going to be tight," Jones said. "We know that every game is going to be a similar atmosphere." "It may come down to a field goal to end the game," he added. The Chiefs led 13-0 at halftime after the Chargers punted on their first five possessions, but Justin Herbert and LA woke up in the second half, scoring on each of their three drives. Cameron Dicker's 37-yard field goal put the Chargers ahead 17-16 with 4:35 left. Mahomes then went to work, hitting Xavier Worthy for 14 yards on third-and-10 and scrambling for another first down. After the two-minute warning, Mahomes scrambled, dodged a would-be tackle and lobbed a throw to a kneeling Travis Kelce that allowed the Chiefs to run the clock down to zero. Mahomes was 24 of 37 for 210 yards and threw a 9-yard pass to DeAndre Hopkins late in the first half for Kansas City's only touchdown. Herbert went 21 of 30 for 213 yards and a TD. Mahomes was sacked three times and has taken 13 sacks over the past three games, the most of any three-game stretch in his career. The Chargers opened the second half with a 13-play, 79-yard drive that concluded with Gus Edwards' 3-yard touchdown run. Following a Chiefs punt, the Chargers then went 74 yards on four plays, aided by 39-yard pass interference penalty on Justin Reid, to take a 14-13 lead. Herbert found Quentin Johnson for a 4-yard touchdown, the Chargers' first TD pass in 13 quarters. The Chiefs responded with Wright’s third field goal, this one from 50 yards after an unsportsmanlike-conduct penalty against Trey Smith pushed Kansas City back. The Chiefs settled for Wright's 47-yard field goal on their opening drive, during which Mahomes passed Dan Marino for the most passing yards in the first eight years of a career. Late in the second quarter, Herbert was hit by Kansas City linebacker Nick Bolton, forcing him to miss a play and leading to the Chargers' fifth punt. The Chiefs responded with a 9-play, 77-yard drive that ended with Hopkins' TD catch. Kansas City's halftime lead was its largest of the season and it shut out an opponent in the first half for the first time. Receiving royalty Kelce finished with 45 yards receiving and has 12,010 in his career, trailing only Tony Gonzalez and Jason Witten among tight ends. Injuries Herbert missed only one play after the hit by Bolton after trainers looked at his left leg. Taylor Heinicke replaced him. ... TE Will Dissly left the game with a right shoulder injury in the third quarter. ... WR Jalen Reagor was hurt in the third quarter. Chiefs T DJ Humphries left in the fourth quarter with a hamstring injury. Up next Chargers: Host Tampa Bay next Sunday. Chiefs: At Cleveland next Sunday.
Gainers TruGolf Holdings TRUG stock rose 60.6% to $0.83 during Friday's pre-market session. The market value of their outstanding shares is at $11.3 million. Kore Group Holdings KORE shares moved upwards by 18.69% to $1.46. The company's market cap stands at $24.8 million. Brera Holdings BREA stock moved upwards by 13.65% to $0.76. The market value of their outstanding shares is at $10.0 million. Starbox Group Hldgs STBX stock rose 11.78% to $1.6. The market value of their outstanding shares is at $78.9 million. Gaxos.AI GXAI shares moved upwards by 7.83% to $3.99. The company's market cap stands at $11.4 million. LQR House LQR shares rose 7.14% to $1.2. The company's market cap stands at $8.6 million. Losers Fangdd Network Group DUO shares decreased by 12.5% to $0.69 during Friday's pre-market session. The company's market cap stands at $16.0 million. Anghami ANGH stock decreased by 8.58% to $0.8. The market value of their outstanding shares is at $53.4 million. TuanChe TC stock decreased by 6.13% to $0.92. The market value of their outstanding shares is at $1.6 million. Gaia GAIA shares declined by 6.07% to $4.96. The market value of their outstanding shares is at $116.0 million. Gambling.com Gr GAMB stock fell 5.32% to $14.8. The company's market cap stands at $546.4 million. Haoxi Health Technology HAO shares declined by 4.9% to $0.13. The company's market cap stands at $6.6 million. See Also: www.benzinga.com/money/best-communication-services-stocks/ This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor. © 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.Primark fans running to snap up new PJ range -it’ll take you back to the early 2000s & it’s perfect for stocking fillersNone
Coherent Announces General Availability of Industrial Temperature Range 100G ZR QSFP28-DCORogers Provides Update on Its Acquisition of Bell's 37.5% Stake in MLSE
Rupert Murdoch's audacious bid to cement his eldest son's control over one of the world's most influential media empires has failed, a US report said Monday. The first family of news -- commanding a stable that includes Fox News, The Wall Street Journal and a host of British and Australian media -- had been the inspiration for the hit TV series "Succession." Like the fictional version, this real-life fight pitted the children of a powerful patriarch against each other for who should be the face and the voice of the empire after the old man dies. Murdoch, now 93, had long intended that his children inherit the empire, and jointly decide its direction. The eldest daughter, Prudence, has had little involvement in the family business, but at various times the other three -- Lachlan, James and Elisabeth -- have all been considered as successors. But in recent years Murdoch senior had reportedly grown concerned that Fox News -- the crown jewels of the collection -- might drift away from its lucrative right-wing moorings after his death, to reflect the more centrist views of James and Elisabeth. He had therefore sought to designate Lachlan -- who currently heads Fox News and News Corp -- as the controlling player in the wider business. That had required rewriting the terms of an irrevocable trust that passed power to the four siblings jointly, stripping three of them of voting power, while allowing them to continue to benefit financially. Rupert Murdoch had argued that giving control to Lachlan -- who is understood to share his father's worldview -- was in the financial interests of the whole brood. The family intrigue played out behind closed doors in a Nevada courtroom, where Murdoch senior and his four children were understood to have given several days' evidence in September. In a decision filed at the weekend, probate commissioner Edmund J. Gorman Jr. said the father and son had acted in "bad faith" in trying to rewrite the rules, The New York Times reported, citing a copy of the sealed court document. The plan to alter the trust's structure was a "carefully crafted charade" to "permanently cement Lachlan Murdoch's executive roles." "The effort was an attempt to stack the deck in Lachlan Murdoch's favor after Rupert Murdoch's passing so that his succession would be immutable," the Times cited the ruling as saying. "The play might have worked; but an evidentiary hearing, like a showdown in a game of poker, is where gamesmanship collides with the facts and at its conclusion, all the bluffs are called and the cards lie face up. "The court, after considering the facts of this case in the light of the law, sees the cards for what they are and concludes this raw deal will not, over the signature of this probate commissioner, prevail." Murdoch's lawyer, Adam Streisand, did not immediately reply to an AFP request for comment. The ruling is not final, and must now be ratified or rejected by a district judge. That ruling could be challenged, perhaps provoking another round of legal arguments. The complicated structure of the irrevocable trust reflects the colourful familial relationships that shaped Rupert Murdoch's life as he built the multibillion-dollar empire. The trust was reported to have been the result of a deal agreed with his second wife -- mother of Lachlan, Elisabeth and James -- who wanted to ensure her offspring would not be disenfranchised by children Murdoch had with his third wife, Wendi Deng. The Murdoch empire has transformed tabloid newspapers, cable TV and satellite broadcasting over the last few decades while facing accusations of stoking populism across the English-speaking world. Brexit in Britain and the rise of Donald Trump in the United States are credited at least partly to Murdoch and his outlets. hg/nro
Polish PM Says Fortifications On Russian, Belarusian Borders Are 'Investment In Peace'Oscar-Winning EP Releases 'Kurt Vonnegut: Reporter On The Afterlife' For Shirley Chisholm Day On 100Th Birthday 11/30
Pune, Nov 30 (IANS) : Veteran social crusader, Dr Babasaheb Pandurang Adhav (96), alias Baba Adhav broke his 3-day long hunger strike to oppose EVMs after a galaxy of political leaders including Sharad Pawar and Uddhav Thackeray plus others met him here on Saturday evening. The weary-looking Dr Baba Adhav, a medico-cum-labour leader, received Nationalist Congress (SP) President Sharad Pawar, his state President Jayant R. Patil, Shiv Sena (UBT) President Uddhav Thackeray, party MP Sanjay Raut, and later Nationalist Congress Party President Ajit A. Pawar also dropped in at the agitation venue. Around 5 p.m., Dr Baba Adhav bowed to appeals from his supporters and accepted a glass of water offered by Thackeray, symbolising the end of his hunger agitation amidst claps and cheers. “There have been huge discrepancies in the voter turnout figures declared by the ECI, kept changing, the vote-counting processes were allegedly manipulated to give undue advantage to the outgoing MahaYuti, and related aspects. The verdict is an assault on democracy,” said Dr Baba Adhav earlier, speaking to the media. Asserting that the people have a right to know where their votes have actually gone, the frail, but firm, nonagenarian pointed out how the MahaYuti regime doled out cash to women (‘Ladki Bahin’) scheme just before the elections and undermined the state’s delicate financial condition, as Sharad Pawar, 83, nodded in agreement. “The government wants a democracy that gives it a monopoly without any Opposition (party). Therefore it is the duty and responsibility of all citizens to thwart this, and take a firm stance,” urged Dr Baba Adhav. Speaking on the occasion, Thackeray said that “not only the losers like us (Maha Vikas Aghadi), but even the winners (MahaYuti) leaders are coming here”. “Nobody, neither the winners nor the losers believe in the outcome of the state Assembly elections. We are stunned over how we lost, they are shocked at how they won. The reason is clear. ‘Satyameve Jayate’ was killed, but now you (Dr Baba Adha) have revived it and we are fully with you,” said Thackeray. The Shiv Sena (UBT) President said this agitation was like a spark but it would ignite into a huge blaze, and lauded Dr Baba Adhav for carrying out the agitation at his advanced age and “inspiring all of us” to continue the fight. “We have also seen and heard how money power was brutally used in the polls... All have watched the videos of (Bharatiya Janata Party) leader Vinod Tawde (in Palghar, on November 19). We have seen the shower of schemes. But what the MahaYuti did was to give anaesthesia to all its projects to complete its ‘power operation’ quickly,” said Thackeray without mincing words. He also called upon the top leaders of the MVA parties NCP (SP)-Shiv Sena (UBT)-Congress to follow in Dr Baba Adhav’s footsteps, and carry forward the fight against EVMs, even as the Election Commission of India (ECI) invited a Congress delegation to discuss its grievances (December 3) on the state poll outcome. The Shiv Sena (UBT) chief rued how the information on elections is not available under RTI, how people’s rights are being flouted, while the EVM-VVPAT receipt is visible, counting of the same is not allowed, thus preventing the people and candidates from knowing whether their vote got registered properly or not, leading to many doubts. Taking potshots at the MahaYuti for the huge delay in government formation, Thackeray said that after getting a brute majority, “instead of going to Raj Bhavan (for the oath), the caretaker CM has gone to his farmland,” and wondered what had gone wrong. “When the MVA government was due to be formed (in November 2019), the President’s rule was imposed... Now, (2024), the term of the legislature has expired, so why is the same not being done now? No one will answer these questions...There is complete uncertainty on the new regime, who could be the CM, ministers, portfolios, etc,” said Thackeray.Andrew N. Ferguson is President-elect Donald Trump’s choice to head the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). If approved by the Republican-controlled Senate, his selection could indicate an inclination by the incoming Trump administration to deprioritize FTC rulemaking and enforcement activities related to data privacy and AI. This also could indicate a broader regulatory philosophy that emphasizes legislative action over administrative rulemaking. Ferguson’s stated regulatory philosophy and strategic priorities, if implemented as FTC chair, would have profound implications for industry and consumers. Critics argue that this shift would mean that critical privacy issues will be given short shrift as technologies like AI and data analytics rapidly evolve and outpace regulatory schema. Meanwhile, Trump announced that he intends to nominate Mark Meador to be an FTC commissioner. Meador is a partner at Washington, D.C.-based Kressin Meador Powers. He also was an antitrust counsel to Republican U.S. Senator Mike Lee. While specific details about Meador’s positions on privacy and AI regulation are scant, given his antitrust expertise it is plausible that he would advocate for a more balanced approach to regulation, aiming to foster innovation while ensuring consumer protection, a perspective that aligns with the broader Republican emphasis on limited government intervention and market-driven solutions. Ferguson is the former solicitor general of Virginia, a former counsel to Republican Senator and Senate Minority leader Mitch McConnell, and he a clerked for U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. If confirmed, he will inherit a slew of regulatory actions against Big Tech and a half-dozen lawsuits by companies arguing that the FTC overstepped its authority. There’s also the FTC’s investigation – launched in July 2023 – of OpenAI for possible privacy issues. Ferguson has voted in favor of every privacy-related FTC enforcement action as an FTC commissioner, but he also has consistently emphasized the importance of congressional authority in crafting comprehensive data privacy laws. In a leaked memo he wrote to Trump reportedly advocating for the top FTC post, he said the FTC under his direction will “stop abusing FTC enforcement authorities as a substitute for comprehensive privacy legislation,” and that there will be “no more novel and legally dubious consumer protection cases.” One matter in particular that Ferguson will have to contend with, and which will have to be addressed, is the that the agency has taken against two Virginia-based data brokers. The complaint alleges that they unlawfully tracked and sold sensitive consumer location data. Ferguson supported two of the counts that the commission brought against the firms, but dissented from the commission’s counts that accuses them of unfairly categorizing consumers based on sensitive characteristics and of selling those categorizations to third parties. In his dissent, Ferguson argued that the FTC Act explicitly prohibits the collection and subsequent sale of precise location data without the consumer’s consent. He emphasized that data brokers are required to take reasonable measures to verify that consumers initially consented to the collection of the data being utilized and sold. Ferguson agreed that if a company aggregates and categorizes data that were collected without proper consent and then sells those categorizations, it violates Section 5 of the FTC Act. But he also argued that the violation arises from the lack of consent for the original data collection, not from the specific categories into which the data are organized. Ferguson said the FTC Act imposes consent requirements in defined circumstances, but it does not restrict how legally acquired data may be analyzed, or the conclusions that may be drawn from such analysis. That line of thinking begins to walk a very fine line. Yes, data is acquired legally. But highly granularized analysis of an individual’s aggregated data, and the sorts of personal conclusions that can be inferred from it, begins to edge very close to raising legitimate privacy concerns. It also raises the incentive for bad actors to steal the information – in bulk. Ferguson said the FTC commissioners have an erroneous view of the FTC Act as being “a comprehensive privacy law,” adding that “comprehensive privacy regulation involves difficult choices and expensive tradeoffs. Congress alone can make those choices and tradeoffs. We must not stray from the bounds of the law.” Indeed. Ferguson believes broad regulatory initiatives on privacy should emerge from Congress, not an administrative federal agency, an approach that underscores his critique of what he views as regulatory overreach by administrative bodies. The FTC’s role, Ferguson has said, should focus on enforcing existing laws rather than expanding its mandate through rulemaking. Ferguson has been highly critical of what he perceives to have been regulatory overreach under previous FTC leadership. He’s argued that the FTC should focus on its core competencies – namely, enforcing existing laws – rather than creating new rules that could extend its mandate without clear legislative backing. “Commissioner Ferguson has made no secret of his preference for Congress, rather than the FTC, to set clear privacy guardrails,” said Cobun Zweifel-Keegan, managing director at the International Association of Privacy Professionals. “This means rulemaking activities at the commission are likely to be deprioritized.” Privacy advocates fear this deprioritization could kill a proposed rule on commercial surveillance and data security that the FTC in August 2022 that it is considering. The commission at that time published an advance notice of proposed rulemaking to request public comment – for the purpose of the rulemaking – on the prevalence of commercial surveillance and data security practices that harm consumers. The FTC said at the time that the new rule will focus on data security, data minimization, and algorithmic accountability. Under Ferguson’s leadership, the FTC would likely redirect resources toward enforcement of existing laws such as the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) and provisions under Section 5 of the FTC Act which targets unfair or deceptive practices. This strategy would suggest a preference for addressing specific harms through targeted actions rather than introducing broad, preemptive regulations. Indeed, rather than pursuing expansive, preemptive rulemaking initiatives, the focus is more likely to lean towards addressing specific, well-defined harms like deceptive practices by data brokers. And as for data brokers – which have come under withering in the wake of an unprecedented this summer – they could face less systemic scrutiny under a Ferguson FTC. Enforcement actions may become more sporadic and narrowly defined. Rather than proposing rules to regulate the industry, the FTC might instead rely on case-by-case enforcement, potentially creating an inconsistent and less predictable regulatory environment. Ferguson’s stance aligns with Republicans’ broader emphasis on ensuring regulatory clarity and avoiding undue burdens on businesses. This approach diverges sharply from the path that was set by Ferguson’s predecessor, Lina Khan, who championed a more proactive regulatory approach. It was under Khan’s leadership that the FTC issued the impending rulemaking on commercial surveillance and data security practices, which seeks to address systemic issues in privacy and consumer protection. Ferguson’s position, on the other hand, represents a stark departure, potentially one that could pause or roll back such initiatives. Critics have argued that this could delay progress in protecting consumer data in an era of rapid technological change. Ferguson’s departure from this activism could signal a rollback of momentum in establishing comprehensive privacy standards. Ferguson’s strategy, while appealing to those who advocate for limited government intervention, poses certain risks. The absence of federal rulemaking could perpetuate a fragmented regulatory landscape where states enact their own privacy laws. This patchwork will only further complicate compliance for businesses, especially those operating across multiple jurisdictions. And consumers could see delayed protections against data misuse and breaches. And enforcement actions alone likely would not adequately address systemic vulnerabilities in data security. For the business community, especially Big Tech, Ferguson’s position offers a reprieve from the immediate pressures of adapting to new federal regulations. Established companies, especially in the tech and data brokering industries, would undoubtedly find this environment more favorable for their operations. Smaller firms and startups though would encounter challenges navigating the inconsistencies of state laws without clear federal guidelines. Such regulatory uncertainty could stifle innovation in some sectors while empowering larger entities to consolidate their influence. Ferguson’s overall approach to privacy regulation reflects a broader effort to balance enforcement with fostering innovation. He has expressed concerns that excessive regulatory measures could stifle technological advancement and impede competition, a position that’s been by the incoming Republican dominated Congress. Republican lawmakers have favored a more market-driven and hands-off approach when it comes to regulating consumer data privacy than their Democratic counterparts. By focusing on enforcement of existing rules rather than expansive rulemaking, Ferguson would seek to maintain this balance, even if it means delaying the establishment of universal protections. Ferguson’s position on deprioritizing privacy rulemaking could also signal a shift in the FTC’s focus toward narrower enforcement and a reliance on Congress for broader legislative solutions. While this approach aligns with his regulatory philosophy, it raises concerns about the FTC’s ability to address emerging privacy challenges effectively in an increasingly complex digital environment. With the rise of AI technologies, Ferguson’s reluctance to engage in privacy-related rulemaking could hinder the FTC’s ability to establish clear guidelines on the use of consumer data in AI training and applications. Ferguson has said that he would “end the FTC’s attempt to become an AI regulator.” His unabashed approach to AI reflects a desire to foster innovation and competition while avoiding premature or overly burdensome regulations that could stifle technological advancement. Wedbush analyst Dan Ives said in a client note that: “We expect Ferguson to continue to have a keen eye on the tech world ... he will clearly roll back Khan’s head-scratching anti-tech agenda, including ending efforts to regulate AI.” Such a restrained position though raises questions about the adequacy of existing legal frameworks to address the unique challenges and risks that increasingly are posed by AI technologies. Ferguson has expressed skepticism about the FTC’s attempts to position itself as a primary regulator of AI. He critiqued initiatives under Khan that sought to expand the FTC’s role in governing AI systems, arguing that such actions could exceed the agency’s statutory authority. He’s said that he favors a measured approach that focuses on enforcing existing laws against deceptive or unfair practices in the use of AI. This approach could possibly translate into investigating AI systems that mislead consumers, perpetuate fraud, or violate privacy laws. The impact of Ferguson’s stance on AI regulation is multifaceted. On the one hand, it could create a more innovation-friendly environment by giving developers and businesses greater latitude to experiment with AI technologies without immediate regulatory constraints, but it could also accelerate technological progress, particularly in areas where regulatory uncertainty has previously slowed investment and development. Businesses operating in AI would benefit from clearer, more predictable enforcement under existing laws rather than having to navigate a potentially ambiguous or stringent new regulatory landscape. On the other hand, though, this approach could leave critical gaps in oversight. AI technologies introduce unique risks, such as algorithmic bias, lack of transparency, and the potential for misuse in areas like surveillance or misinformation. Existing laws, which were not designed with AI’s complexities in mind, could prove insufficient to address these risks comprehensively. By refraining from proactive rulemaking, the FTC could miss opportunities to establish clear guidelines for responsible AI development and deployment, which could lead to inconsistent standards across industries. Another significant implication of Ferguson’s position is the likelihood of increased reliance on state or sector-specific regulations to fill the gap left by federal inaction. For example, states like California and New York may continue to advance their own AI-specific laws, creating a fragmented regulatory landscape. While larger companies may have the resources to navigate this complexity, smaller firms could struggle to comply, potentially disadvantaging startups and innovators. | | | |Adam Pemble, an Associated Press video journalist who covered some of the biggest global news of the past two decades, from earthquakes and conflicts to political summits and elections, has died. He was 52. Pemble died Thursday in Minneapolis surrounded by friends and family, according to his friend Mike Moe, who helped care for him in the final weeks of his fight against cancer. Known for bringing stories alive with his camera, Pemble epitomized the best of television news traditions, casting a curious and compassionate lens onto the lives of the people and communities whose stories he told. He joined the AP in 2007 in New York before moving to Prague in 2011 to help launch AP’s first cross-format operation combining photography, text stories and video. He enhanced Eastern European news coverage, creating distinctive stories highlighting the region’s culture and society. “Adam was an incredibly talented and passionate journalist and an empathetic storyteller. He had this amazing ability to get anyone to talk to him on camera, which I attribute to the Midwestern charm he embodied throughout his life.” said Sara Gillesby, AP’s Director of Global Video and Pemble’s former manager in New York when he joined the AP. “He was the best of us.” Pemble was born in Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, in 1972 and grew up in Minneapolis. After graduating with a degree in mass communications from Minnesota State University Moorhead, he started his journalism career in 1997 at KVLY, a television station in Fargo, North Dakota, and later worked at WCCO in Minneapolis. “He had the skills of the old-school camera people to meet a deadline and turn a beautiful story,” said Arthur Phillips, a cameraman who worked with Pemble at WCCO. “But he had a calling for greater things.” Moving to New York, Pemble covered some of the biggest stories in the city, including the trial of Bernie Madoff, interviews with former Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and with then-real estate developer, now U.S. president-elect, Donald Trump. He went to Haiti to cover the aftermath of the 2010 earthquake, where he captured shocking images of devastation. A few weeks later he was in Vancouver, covering the Winter Olympics. With his transfer to Prague, Pemble quickly became the go-to video journalist deployed to the biggest news events in Europe, interviewing government leaders, covering violent protests, the aftermath of terror attacks and numerous national elections across the continent. “An inquiring mind, a keen eye and a healthy skepticism for those in power who tried to spin away from the truth all combined to make Adam’s stories as rich in colour as he was in character,” said Sandy MacIntyre, former AP head of global video. “Time and again he was asked to do the impossible and without fail he delivered the exceptional.” ”But more than all of that, he was the colleague and friend you wanted by your side because if Adam was there we knew we were going to be the winning team.” As civil unrest rocked Ukraine in 2014, Pemble reported from Kyiv and later Donetsk, where he covered the first Russian-backed demonstrations before spending weeks in Crimea during Russia’s annexation of the strategic peninsula. His video reports included the last remaining Ukrainian sailors loyal to Kyiv, who had finally abandoned their ship and came ashore. With the Russian national anthem playing from a car in the background, his final shot showed two distraught sailors heckled as they walked away. Pemble returned to Ukraine following Russia’s invasion of the country in 2022. Among his many assignments was filming the exclusive March 2023 AP interview by Executive Editor Julie Pace with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy as a train shuttled them across Ukraine to cities near some of the fiercest fighting. “Adam showed up to every assignment with enthusiasm, creativity and commitment to his work and his colleagues. He loved what he did, and so many of us at AP are better for having worked alongside him,” Pace said. When not deployed overseas, Pemble set his camera’s gaze on his new home in the Czech Republic, offering insight into the traditions and unique stories of Eastern Europe. From Christmas carp fishing at sunrise to graffiti artists in Prague to the intimate story of a Slovak priest challenging the celibacy rules of the Catholic Church, he brought his unmistakable style. He worked with a traditional large broadcast camera in an era where many video shooters shifted to smaller, lighter cameras. He always put himself in the right place to let reality unfold like “an old school analog painter in an often fast and furious digital age,” former AP cameraman Ben Jary recalled. Pemble’s interest in visual storytelling led to experimenting with new technologies, including aerial videography. In 2015, he was the first major news agency camera operator to film live drone footage when reporting on the migration crisis in the Balkans. An avid gardener who planted trees and chilis on his rooftop in Prague, he was adventurous in the kitchen and especially proud of his vegan “meatloaf,” friends said. He loved a seedy dive bar as much as a Michelin restaurant and foods as varied as charcoal choux pastry with truffle creme and his favourite road trip junk food, Slim Jim’s jerky and Salted Nut Rolls. Pemble’s wit, wisdom, energy and positivity enriched the lives and experiences of those around him, friends and colleagues recalled. “If someone asked me to see a picture of quiet strength and courage, dignity and grace, and most of all kindness, I would show them a picture of a man for all seasons,” said Dan Huff, a Washington-based AP video journalist, “I would show them a picture of Adam Pemble.”
HIGH SCHOOL BOYS SOCCER: Section 2 boys soccer awards announced at banquetViad Corp Announces Mandatory Conversion Date for 5.5% Convertible Series A Preferred Stock