cockfighting wallpaper

Percentages: FG .342, FT .688. 3-Point Goals: 6-26, .231 (Davis 2-5, Jennings 1-1, Ousmane 1-1, Avery 1-4, Keller 1-4, Dean 0-2, Thompson 0-2, Brantley 0-3, Newman 0-4). Team Rebounds: 4. Team Turnovers: 1. Blocked Shots: 2 (Brantley, Ousmane). Turnovers: 14 (Jennings 3, Avery 2, Brantley 2, Ousmane 2, Davis, Dean, Keller, Newman, Thompson). Steals: 11 (Brantley 3, Dean 3, Avery 2, Davis, Jennings, Ousmane). Technical Fouls: Avery, 15:46 second. Percentages: FG .423, FT .714. 3-Point Goals: 7-23, .304 (Tandy 4-9, Carroll 1-2, Miller 1-2, Evans 1-3, Langenfeld 0-1, Moretti 0-1, Walker 0-2, Glenn 0-3). Team Rebounds: 3. Team Turnovers: None. Blocked Shots: 5 (Vokietaitis 3, Evans, Miller). Turnovers: 15 (Carroll 3, Miller 3, Moretti 3, Evans 2, Glenn 2, Vokietaitis, Walker). Steals: 5 (Walker 3, Evans, Glenn). Technical Fouls: Miller, 5:17 first. A_1,818 (5,100).ATLANTA (AP) — the peanut farmer who won the presidency in the wake of the Watergate scandal and Vietnam War, endured humbling defeat after one tumultuous term and then redefined life after the White House as a global humanitarian, has died. years old. The died on Sunday, more than a year after entering , at his home in the small town of Plains, Georgia, where he and his wife, who , spent most of their lives, The Carter Center said. Businessman, Navy officer, evangelist, politician, negotiator, author, woodworker, citizen of the world — Carter forged a path that still challenges political assumptions and stands out among the 45 men who reached the nation’s highest office. The 39th president leveraged his ambition with a keen intellect, deep religious faith and prodigious work ethic, and well into his 90s. “My faith demands — this is not optional — my faith demands that I do whatever I can, wherever I am, whenever I can, for as long as I can, with whatever I have to try to make a difference,” Carter once said. A president from Plains A moderate Democrat, as a little-known Georgia governor with a broad smile, outspoken Baptist mores and technocratic plans reflecting his education as an engineer. His no-frills campaign depended on public financing, and his promise not to deceive the American people resonated after Richard Nixon’s disgrace and U.S. defeat in southeast Asia. “If I ever lie to you, if I ever make a misleading statement, don’t vote for me. I would not deserve to be your president,” Carter repeated before narrowly beating Republican incumbent Gerald Ford, who had lost popularity pardoning Nixon. Carter governed amid Cold War pressures, turbulent oil markets and social upheaval over racism, women’s rights and America’s global role. His most acclaimed achievement in office was a Mideast peace deal that he brokered by keeping Egyptian President Anwar Sadat and Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin at the bargaining table for 13 days in 1978. That Camp David experience inspired the post-presidential center where Carter would establish so much of his legacy. Yet Carter’s electoral coalition splintered under double-digit inflation, gasoline lines and the 444-day hostage crisis in Iran. His bleakest hour came when eight Americans died in a failed hostage rescue in April 1980, helping to ensure his landslide defeat to Republican Ronald Reagan. Carter acknowledged in his 2020 “White House Diary” that he could be “micromanaging” and “excessively autocratic,” complicating dealings with Congress and the federal bureaucracy. He also turned a cold shoulder to Washington’s news media and lobbyists, not fully appreciating their influence on his political fortunes. “It didn’t take us long to realize that the underestimation existed, but by that time we were not able to repair the mistake,” Carter told historians in 1982, suggesting that he had “an inherent incompatibility” with Washington insiders. Carter insisted his overall approach was sound and that he achieved his primary objectives — to “protect our nation’s security and interests peacefully” and “enhance human rights here and abroad” — even if he fell spectacularly short of a second term. And then, the world Ignominious defeat, though, allowed for renewal. The Carters founded The Carter Center in 1982 as a first-of-its-kind base of operations, asserting themselves as international peacemakers and champions of democracy, public health and human rights. “I was not interested in just building a museum or storing my White House records and memorabilia,” Carter wrote in a memoir published after his 90th birthday. “I wanted a place where we could work.” That work included easing nuclear tensions in North and South Korea, helping to avert a U.S. invasion of Haiti and negotiating cease-fires in Bosnia and Sudan. By 2022, The Carter Center had declared at least 113 elections in Latin America, Asia and Africa to be free or fraudulent. Recently, the center as well. Carter’s stubborn self-assuredness and even self-righteousness proved effective once he was unencumbered by the Washington order, sometimes to the point of . He went “where others are not treading,” he said, to places like Ethiopia, Liberia and North Korea, where he secured the release of an American who had wandered across the border in 2010. “I can say what I like. I can meet whom I want. I can take on projects that please me and reject the ones that don’t,” Carter said. He announced an arms-reduction-for-aid deal with North Korea without clearing the details with Bill Clinton’s White House. He openly criticized President George W. Bush for the 2003 invasion of Iraq. He also criticized America’s approach to Israel with his 2006 book “Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid.” And he repeatedly countered U.S. administrations by insisting North Korea should be included in international affairs, a position that most aligned Carter Among the center’s many public health initiatives, Carter vowed to eradicate the guinea worm parasite during his lifetime, and Cases dropped from millions in the 1980s to nearly a handful. With hardhats and hammers, the Carters also built homes with Habitat for Humanity. The Nobel committee’s 2002 Peace Prize cites his “untiring effort to find peaceful solutions to international conflicts, to advance democracy and human rights, and to promote economic and social development.” Carter should have won it alongside Sadat and Begin in 1978, the chairman added. Carter accepted the recognition saying there was more work to be done. “The world is now, in many ways, a more dangerous place,” he said. “The greater ease of travel and communication has not been matched by equal understanding and mutual respect.” ‘An epic American life’ Carter’s globetrotting took him to remote villages where he met little “Jimmy Carters,” so named by admiring parents. But he spent most of his days in the same one-story Plains house — expanded and guarded by Secret Service agents — where they lived before he became governor. He regularly at Maranatha Baptist Church until his mobility declined and the coronavirus pandemic raged. Those sessions drew visitors from around the world to the small sanctuary where Carter will receive his final send-off after a state funeral at Washington’s National Cathedral. The common assessment that he was a rankled Carter and his allies. His prolific post-presidency gave him a brand above politics, particularly for Americans too young to witness him in office. But Carter also lived long enough to see biographers and historians reassess his White House years more generously. His record includes the deregulation of key industries, reduction of U.S. dependence on foreign oil, cautious management of the national debt and notable legislation on the environment, education and mental health. He focused on human rights in foreign policy, . He acknowledged America’s historical imperialism, pardoned Vietnam War draft evaders and relinquished control of the Panama Canal. He normalized relations with China. “I am not nominating Jimmy Carter for a place on Mount Rushmore,” Stuart Eizenstat, Carter’s domestic policy director, wrote in a 2018 book. “He was not a great president” but also not the “hapless and weak” caricature voters rejected in 1980, Eizenstat said. Rather, Carter was “good and productive” and “delivered results, many of which were realized only after he left office.” Madeleine Albright, a national security staffer for Carter and Clinton’s secretary of state, wrote in Eizenstat’s forward that Carter was “consequential and successful” and expressed hope that “perceptions will continue to evolve” about his presidency. “Our country was lucky to have him as our leader,” said Albright, Jonathan Alter, who penned a comprehensive Carter biography published in 2020, said in an interview that Carter should be remembered for “an epic American life” spanning from a humble start in a home with no electricity or indoor plumbing through decades on the world stage across two centuries. “He will likely go down as one of the most misunderstood and underestimated figures in American history,” Alter told The Associated Press. A small-town start James Earl Carter Jr. was born Oct. 1, 1924, in Plains and spent his early years in nearby Archery. His family was a minority in the mostly Black community, decades before the civil rights movement played out at the dawn of Carter’s political career. Carter, who campaigned as a moderate on race relations but governed more progressively, talked often of the influence of his Black caregivers and playmates but also noted his advantages: His land-owning father sat atop Archery’s tenant-farming system and owned a main street grocery. , would become a staple of his political campaigns. Seeking to broaden his world beyond Plains and its population of fewer than 1,000 — then and now — Carter won an appointment to the U.S. Naval Academy, graduating in 1946. That same year another Plains native, a decision he considered more important than any he made as head of state. She shared his desire to see the world, sacrificing college to support his Navy career. Carter climbed in rank to lieutenant, but then his father was diagnosed with cancer, so the submarine officer set aside his ambitions of admiralty and moved the family back to Plains. even as she dived into the peanut business alongside her husband. Carter again failed to talk with his wife before his first run for office — he later called it “inconceivable” not to have consulted her on such major life decisions — but this time, she was on board. “My wife is much more political,” Carter told the AP in 2021. He won a state Senate seat in 1962 and its back-slapping, deal-cutting ways. He ran for governor in 1966 — losing to arch-segregationist Lester Maddox — and then immediately focused on the next campaign. Carter had spoken out against church segregation as a Baptist deacon and opposed racist “Dixiecrats” as a state senator. Yet as a local school board leader in the 1950s he had not pushed to end school segregation even after the Supreme Court’s Brown v. Board of Education decision, despite his private support for integration. And in 1970, Carter ran for governor again as the more conservative Democrat against Carl Sanders, a wealthy businessman Carter mocked as “Cufflinks Carl.” Sanders never forgave him for anonymous, race-baiting flyers, which Carter disavowed. Ultimately, Carter won his races by attracting both Black voters and culturally conservative whites. Once in office, he was more direct. “I say to you quite frankly that the time for racial discrimination is over,” he declared in his 1971 inaugural address, setting a new standard for Southern governors that landed him on the cover of Time magazine. ‘Jimmy Who?’ His statehouse initiatives included environmental protection, boosting rural education and overhauling antiquated executive branch structures. He proclaimed Martin Luther King Jr. Day in the slain civil rights leader’s home state. And he decided, as he received presidential candidates in 1972, that they were In 1974, he ran Democrats’ national campaign arm. Then he declared his own candidacy for 1976. An Atlanta newspaper responded with the headline: “Jimmy Who?” and Georgia supporters camped out in Iowa and New Hampshire, establishing both states as presidential proving grounds. His first Senate endorsement: a young first-termer from Delaware named Joe Biden. Yet it was Carter’s ability to navigate America’s complex racial and rural politics that cemented the nomination. He swept the Deep South that November, the last Democrat to do so, as many white Southerners shifted to Republicans in response to civil rights initiatives. A self-declared “born-again Christian,” Carter drew snickers by referring to Scripture in a Playboy magazine interview, saying he “had looked on many women with lust. I’ve committed adultery in my heart many times.” The remarks gave Ford a new foothold and television comedians pounced — including NBC’s new “Saturday Night Live” show. But voters weary of cynicism in politics found it endearing. Carter chose Minnesota Sen. as his running mate on a “Grits and Fritz” ticket. In office, he elevated the vice presidency and the first lady’s office. Mondale’s governing partnership was a model for influential successors Al Gore, Dick Cheney and Biden. Rosalynn Carter was one of the most involved presidential spouses in history, welcomed into Cabinet meetings and huddles with lawmakers and top aides. The Carters presided with uncommon informality: He used his nickname “Jimmy” even when taking the oath of office, carried his own luggage and tried to silence the Marine Band’s “Hail to the Chief.” They bought their clothes off the rack. Carter wore a cardigan for a White House address, urging Americans to conserve energy by turning down their thermostats. Amy, the youngest of four children, attended District of Columbia public school. Washington’s social and media elite scorned their style. But the larger concern was that “he hated politics,” according to Eizenstat, leaving him nowhere to turn politically once economic turmoil and foreign policy challenges took their toll. Accomplishments, and ‘malaise’ Carter partially deregulated the airline, railroad and trucking industries and established the departments of Education and Energy, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency. He designated millions of acres of Alaska as national parks or wildlife refuges. He appointed a then-record number of women and nonwhite people to federal posts. He never had a Supreme Court nomination, but he elevated civil rights attorney to the nation’s second highest court, positioning her for a promotion in 1993. He appointed Paul Volker, the Federal Reserve chairman whose policies would help the economy boom in the 1980s — after Carter left office. He built on Nixon’s opening with China, and though he tolerated autocrats in Asia, pushed Latin America from dictatorships to democracy. But he couldn’t immediately tame inflation or the related energy crisis. And then came Iran. After he admitted the exiled Shah of Iran to the U.S. for medical treatment, the American Embassy in Tehran was overrun in 1979 by followers of the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. Negotiations to free the hostages broke down repeatedly ahead of the failed rescue attempt. The same year, Carter signed SALT II, the new strategic arms treaty with Leonid Brezhnev of the Soviet Union, only to pull it back, impose trade sanctions and order a U.S. boycott of the Moscow Olympics after the Soviets invaded Afghanistan. Hoping to instill optimism, he delivered what the media dubbed his “malaise” speech, although he didn’t use that word. He declared the nation was suffering “a crisis of confidence.” By then, many Americans had lost confidence in the president, not themselves. Carter campaigned sparingly for reelection because of the hostage crisis, instead for the Democratic nomination. Carter famously said he’d “kick his ass,” but was hobbled by Kennedy as Reagan rallied a broad coalition with “make America great again” appeals and asking voters whether they were “better off than you were four years ago.” Reagan further capitalized on Carter’s lecturing tone, eviscerating him in their lone fall debate with the quip: “There you go again.” Carter lost all but six states and Republicans rolled to a new Senate majority. Carter successfully negotiated the hostages’ freedom after the election, but in one final, bitter turn of events, Tehran waited until hours after Carter left office to let them walk free. ‘A wonderful life’ At 56, Carter returned to Georgia with “no idea what I would do with the rest of my life.” Four decades after launching The Carter Center, he still talked of unfinished business. “I thought when we got into politics we would have resolved everything,” Carter told the AP in 2021. “But it’s turned out to be much more long-lasting and insidious than I had thought it was. I think in general, the world itself is much more divided than in previous years.” Still, he affirmed what he said when he underwent treatment for a in his 10th decade of life. “I’m perfectly at ease with whatever comes,” . “I’ve had a wonderful life. I’ve had thousands of friends, I’ve had an exciting, adventurous and gratifying existence.” ___ Former Associated Press journalist Alex Sanz contributed to this report. Bill Barrow, The Associated Presscockfighting wallpaper 。

ISLAMABAD - Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Information Secretary Sheikh Waqas Akram on Sunday lambasted the political aides of President Asif Ali Zardari and Sharif family, alleging that they are merely targeting PTI founder Imran Khan to garner public attention and media coverage. Reacting to Defence Minister Khawaja Muhammad Asif and Chairman Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Bilawal Bhutto Zardari’s recent outbursts, Akram fired back, saying that even these “political entertainers privately acknowledged” that the PTI founder sacrificed his comfort for Pakistan’s greater good. “They have been admitting the bitter truth that only Khan is the political reality of the country,” he added. He claimed that former prime minister Imran Khan was a leader of international stature, while his critics were “mere pawns unleashed by their masters to unnecessarily criticize the PTI founder because the political demise of the outdated and corrupt political dynasties of Sharifs and Zardaris was imminent.” Earlier in the day, Khawaja Asif in a public statement slammed Khan for begging for US help to ensure his release from jail. He also questioned the motive of PTI’s desire for talks with the political players, saying that for over two years they had been pressing only for engaging with the establishment. Multiple cars pileup in Dera Ismail Khan leaves 20 injured The information secretary said this power greedy clique not entered into a marriage of convenience to serve the nation’s interests, but to deliberately push Khan out of the political landscape. “Their sinister plan ultimately backfired, as they failed miserably in their attempts to sideline him,” he added. He called Bilawal an angry political child and advised him to focus on debating with politicians at his own level, rather than targeting Khan. He said Khan had an unwavering commitment to Pakistan’s sovereignty and national pride, recalling how he consistently stood firm against foreign conspiracies. He recalled that during PTI’s tenure, no drone attacks occurred within its borders, and no country dared to breach its territorial sovereignty. Khan never relied on foreign intervention to secure deals, unlike Zardari and former prime minister Nawaz Sharif, who negotiated exits to avoid jail time and then left the country in shambles, he said. Mashhood unveils plan to empower ‘marginalised communities’The UK is in a "new AI arms race" with countries like Russia and North Korea, the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster will say on Monday. Minister Pat McFadden will be speaking at the NATO Cyber Defence Conference at Lancaster House, warning the UK and its allies that "cyber war is now a daily reality". "Be in no doubt: the United Kingdom and others in this room are watching Russia. We know exactly what they are doing, and we are countering their attacks both publicly and behind the scenes," he will say. "Putin is a man who wants destruction, not peace." In a bid to keep up with adversaries, Mr McFadden will announce a new Laboratory for AI Security Research (LASR). "AI is already revolutionising many parts of life - including national security," he will say. "But as we develop this technology, there's a danger it could be weaponised against us. Because our adversaries are also looking at how to use AI on the physical and cyber battlefield." US officials recently discovered a Chinese attack on the country's telecommunications infrastructure, where operatives "extracted all sorts of sensitive information from US telecommunications and penetrated it very deeply", according to tech investor Andrew Levi. "That shows that this isn't just about Russia," he told Sky News. In May, GCHQ director Anne Keast-Butler said the intelligence agency now "devotes ", after the country hacked the Ministry of Defence's payroll system and was accused of stealing data about UK voters from the Electoral Commission. In recent months, cyber security firm Check Point said it had seen "an uptick of 72% in cyber attacks on targets in the UK", according to Sergey Shykevitch, who leads the company's threat intelligence research. "It is definitely possible, with the right investment and national cyber security strategy, to reduce the risks from such attacks," he told Sky News. "But we have to remember that for the attacker, it is enough to have one successful attack in order to achieve their goal, while the defender has to be able to prevent 100% of the attacks." The new AI laboratory will receive an initial £8.22m round of government funding before inviting further investment and collaboration from industry. However, one expert told Sky News AI is only "one part of the puzzle" in terms of making the UK less vulnerable to cyberattacks. "We need to fundamentally change our posture and invest in our networks," said Stephen Kines, chief executive of British cyber security firm Goldilock. He said the UK's "legacy infrastructure" leaves the country vulnerable and adding AI protection on top is like having a "nice front door" with a security camera doorbell but an "old-school back door". "That's really the problem we have. We've got these back doors that just have no security whatsoever," he said. Mr Kines suggests the UK would be better off implementing physical "kill switches" in its grids in order to protect against Russian attacks, as well as reducing how many access points are connected to the internet. "If you take it down to the physical layer, then you can actually defeat the Russians because they can't physically penetrate it from thousands of miles away." Alongside the new laboratory, the chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster will also announce a new £1m incident response project to share expertise so that allies can respond to cyber incidents more effectively.

CG Oncology, Inc. ( NASDAQ:CGON – Get Free Report ) shot up 2.5% during mid-day trading on Friday . The stock traded as high as $29.90 and last traded at $29.85. 328,509 shares were traded during mid-day trading, a decline of 51% from the average session volume of 667,276 shares. The stock had previously closed at $29.11. Wall Street Analyst Weigh In Several research firms have recently issued reports on CGON. Bank of America reaffirmed a “buy” rating and set a $65.00 price target on shares of CG Oncology in a research note on Tuesday, October 8th. HC Wainwright reaffirmed a “buy” rating and set a $75.00 target price on shares of CG Oncology in a report on Friday, December 6th. Royal Bank of Canada reissued an “outperform” rating and issued a $66.00 price target on shares of CG Oncology in a research note on Friday, December 6th. Finally, UBS Group assumed coverage on CG Oncology in a research note on Thursday, October 24th. They issued a “buy” rating and a $60.00 price objective on the stock. Eight research analysts have rated the stock with a buy rating and one has issued a strong buy rating to the company’s stock. According to data from MarketBeat, the stock presently has an average rating of “Buy” and a consensus price target of $63.88. View Our Latest Report on CGON CG Oncology Stock Performance CG Oncology ( NASDAQ:CGON – Get Free Report ) last posted its quarterly earnings results on Tuesday, November 12th. The company reported ($0.30) earnings per share (EPS) for the quarter, topping analysts’ consensus estimates of ($0.36) by $0.06. The firm had revenue of $0.04 million for the quarter, compared to analysts’ expectations of $0.30 million. CG Oncology had a negative return on equity of 18.97% and a negative net margin of 10,642.98%. On average, research analysts forecast that CG Oncology, Inc. will post -1.32 earnings per share for the current year. Insider Buying and Selling In related news, Director Leonard E. Post sold 1,000 shares of the business’s stock in a transaction dated Friday, December 6th. The stock was sold at an average price of $34.54, for a total value of $34,540.00. The sale was disclosed in a document filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is available through this hyperlink . Also, Director Hong Fang Song sold 700,000 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction that occurred on Monday, December 16th. The stock was sold at an average price of $28.00, for a total value of $19,600,000.00. Following the transaction, the director now directly owns 3,003,931 shares in the company, valued at approximately $84,110,068. This trade represents a 18.90 % decrease in their ownership of the stock. The disclosure for this sale can be found here . Institutional Investors Weigh In On CG Oncology A number of hedge funds have recently added to or reduced their stakes in CGON. Amalgamated Bank raised its position in shares of CG Oncology by 107.6% during the third quarter. Amalgamated Bank now owns 1,621 shares of the company’s stock worth $61,000 after purchasing an additional 840 shares during the period. Zurcher Kantonalbank Zurich Cantonalbank bought a new stake in CG Oncology during the 3rd quarter valued at $241,000. Profund Advisors LLC acquired a new position in CG Oncology during the second quarter worth $300,000. HighVista Strategies LLC bought a new position in shares of CG Oncology in the third quarter valued at $594,000. Finally, M&T Bank Corp grew its holdings in shares of CG Oncology by 55.7% during the third quarter. M&T Bank Corp now owns 16,758 shares of the company’s stock valued at $632,000 after buying an additional 5,996 shares during the last quarter. Institutional investors and hedge funds own 26.56% of the company’s stock. CG Oncology Company Profile ( Get Free Report ) CG Oncology, Inc, an oncolytic immunotherapy company, focuses on developing and commercializing backbone bladder-sparing therapeutics for patients with bladder cancer. The company develops BOND-003 for the treatment of high-risk bacillus calmette guerin (BCG)-unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients; CORE-001 to treat cretostimogene in combination with pembrolizumab in high-risk BCG-unresponsive NMIBC patients; and CORE-002 for the treatment of cretostimogene in combination with the checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab in muscle invasive bladder cancer patients. Featured Articles Receive News & Ratings for CG Oncology Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for CG Oncology and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. , Dec. 5, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- SaferWatch, a leader in advanced safety and security solutions, has unveiled its comprehensive Executive Protection service , designed to provide unmatched security for high-profile individuals and their teams. With state-of-the-art LTE panic buttons, 24/7/365 professional monitoring, and direct connection to local law enforcement, SaferWatch is setting a new standard in personal and professional safety. At the heart of this service are the SaferWatch LTE panic buttons, which allow users to communicate live with local law enforcement and the SaferWatch monitoring center at any time, from anywhere in the United States . These discreet, portable devices ensure that assistance is only a button press away, providing peace of mind in any situation. Key features of SaferWatch's Executive Protection solution include: "Executive protection requires a level of reliability and precision that traditional security methods often cannot provide," said Geno Roefaro , CEO of SaferWatch. "With our integrated solutions, we're empowering individuals and their security teams to stay connected, protected, and prepared, no matter where they are." SaferWatch's innovative approach not only enhances physical security but also integrates seamlessly with existing protocols, making it an indispensable tool for executives, public figures, and other high-risk individuals. For more information about SaferWatch's Executive Protection service or to schedule a demo, visit www.saferwatchapp.com . About SaferWatch SaferWatch is a leading safety and security platform dedicated to empowering individuals, organizations, and communities with innovative tools to enhance safety. From schools and businesses to law enforcement and personal protection, SaferWatch delivers reliable, technology-driven solutions that save lives. View original content to download multimedia: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/saferwatch-elevates-executive-protection-with-247365-monitoring-live-communication-and-direct-law-enforcement-connectivity-302324321.html SOURCE SaferWatch