winph99 com
Eli Lilly LLY has outperformed the market over the past 10 years by 15.66% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 27.25%. Currently, Eli Lilly has a market capitalization of $742.84 billion. Buying $100 In LLY: If an investor had bought $100 of LLY stock 10 years ago, it would be worth $1,129.58 today based on a price of $782.50 for LLY at the time of writing. Eli Lilly's Performance Over Last 10 Years Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time. This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor. © 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
A bankruptcy judge on Monday ordered a new hearing in conspiracy theorist Alex Jones' effort to stop the satirical news outlet The Onion from buying Infowars and turning it into a parody. Jones alleges fraud and collusion marred the bankruptcy auction in which The Onion was named the winning bidder on Nov. 14 over a company affiliated with him. U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Lopez had been scheduled to hear an emergency motion to disqualify The Onion's bid, but decided to put it off until either Dec. 9 or Dec. 17. That's also when the judge will hear arguments on a request to approve the sale of Infowars to The Onion. Lopez said similar arguments are being made in both requests. Lopez could ultimately allow The Onion to move forward with its purchase, order a new auction or name the other bidder as the winner. At stake is whether Jones gets to stay at Infowars’ studio in Austin, Texas, under a new owner friendly to him, or whether he gets kicked out by The Onion. The other bidder, First United American Companies, runs a website in Jones’ name that sells nutritional supplements. Regardless, Jones has set up a new studio, websites and social media accounts that would allow him to keep airing his show. And his personal account with 3.3 million followers on the social platform X was not part of the sale, although Lopez will be deciding whether it should be included in the liquidation and sold off later. In a new court filing Monday, lawyers for X objected to any sale of the accounts of both Jones and Infowars, saying X is the owner of the accounts and that it has not given consent for them to be sold or transferred. Jones has praised X owner Elon Musk on his show and suggested that Musk should buy Infowars. Musk has not responded publicly to that suggestion and was not among the bidders. Jones' bankruptcy and the liquidation of his assets came about after he was ordered to pay nearly $1.5 billion to relatives of victims of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in Newtown, Connecticut. Jones was found liable for defamation and emotional distress damages in lawsuits in Connecticut and Texas for repeatedly calling the 2012 shooting that killed 20 first graders and six educators a hoax staged by actors to increase gun control. Proceeds from the liquidation are to go to Jones' creditors, including the Sandy Hook families who sued him. Jones alleges The Onion’s bid was the result of fraud and collusion involving many of those families, the humor site and a court-appointed trustee who is overseeing the liquidation. First United American Companies submitted a $3.5 million sealed bid, while The Onion offered $1.75 million in cash. But The Onion's bid also included a pledge by Sandy Hook families to forgo some or all of the auction proceeds due to them to give other creditors a total of $100,000 more than they would receive under other bids. The trustee, Christopher Murray, said that made The Onion's proposal better for creditors and he named it the winning bid. He has denied any wrongdoing. Jones and First United American Companies claimed that the bid violated Lopez’s rules for the auction by including multiple entities and lacking a valid dollar amount. Jones also alleged Murray improperly canceled an expected round of live bidding and only selected from among the sealed bids that were submitted. Jones called the auction “rigged” and a “fraud” on his show, which airs on the Infowars website, radio stations and Jones' X account. He filed a counter lawsuit last week against Murray, The Onion's parent company and the Sandy Hook families in the bankruptcy court. In a court filing on Sunday, Murray called the allegations a “desperate attempt” to delay the sale of Infowars to The Onion and accused Jones, his lawyers and attorneys for First United American Companies of a “vicious smear campaign lobbing patently false accusations.” He also alleges Jones collaborated with First United American Companies to try to buy Infowars. Lopez’s September order on the auction procedures made a live bidding round optional. And it gave broad authority to Murray to conduct the sale, including the power to reject any bid, no matter how high, that was “contrary to the best interests” of Jones, his company and their creditors. But at a Nov. 14 hearing Lopez said he was concerned about the process and transparency. “We’re all going to an evidentiary hearing and I’m going to figure out exactly what happened,” he said. “No one should feel comfortable with the results of this auction.” The assets of Infowars' parent company, Free Speech Systems, that were up for sale included the Austin studio, Infowars' video archive, video production equipment, product trademarks, and Infowars' websites and social media accounts. Jones is appealing the $1.5 billion in judgments citing free speech rights, but has acknowledged that the school shooting happened . Jones has brought in millions of dollars a year in revenue by hawking nutritional supplements, clothing, survival gear and other merchandise, including more than $22 million this year through Sept. 30 from his Infowars Store website, according to court documents. Many of Jones’ personal assets, including real estate, guns and other personal belongings, also are being sold as part of the bankruptcy. Documents filed in court this year say Jones has about $9 million in personal assets, while Free Speech Systems has about $6 million in cash and more than $1 million worth of inventory. Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.( MENAFN - EIN Presswire) Plaintiff Files federal Suit Against Former Minneapolis Police Officer and City of Minneapolis for Sexual Assault and Civil Rights Violations MINNEAPOLIS, MN, UNITED STATES, December 27, 2024 /EINPresswire / -- A federal lawsuit has been filed against former Minneapolis police officer David Edward Campbell, alleging that he sexually assaulted a minor female on numerous occasions while on duty and in uniform. According to the complaint filed by attorneys Timothy Lessman and Paul Peterson, Officer Campbell violated Minneapolis Police Department policies and procedures by conducting unauthorized ride-alongs with the minor in his squad car. The repeated unauthorized ride-alongs, allegedly witnessed by other Minneapolis police officers and supervisors, were neither reported nor investigated. David Edward Campbell was subsequently convicted of 3rd Degree Criminal Sexual Conduct, 4th Degree Criminal Sexual Conduct, Terroristic Threats, and Stalking. He served a prison sentence for his crimes against the minor. Attorney Timothy Lessman, representing the plaintiff, stated:“There is an inherent cruelty to these actions because they were committed by a person of authority, and because they were committed against a vulnerable young person. Mr. Campbell and the City of Minneapolis failed to protect this young lady's civil rights in favor of protecting themselves. On behalf of our client, we are seeking to address the damage caused by these horrific abuses and ensure such violations never happen again.” The civil suit seeks to hold both David Edward Campbell and the City of Minneapolis accountable for the trauma inflicted on the plaintiff and for the failure to enforce department policies designed to prevent such abuses. This case underscores the importance of transparency and accountability in law enforcement to protect the civil rights and safety of all citizens. The case is captioned L.M.G. v. David Edward Campbell, acting in his individual capacity as a Minneapolis Police Officer, and the City of Minneapolis, Court File No.: 0:24-cv-04622. For media inquiries, please contact: [Timothy Lessman, Knutson+Casey Law Firm, Mankato, MN 507 344-8888] Timothy Lessman Knutson + Casey Law Firm +1 507-344-8888 email us here Visit us on social media: Facebook Instagram Other Legal Disclaimer: EIN Presswire provides this news content "as is" without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author above. MENAFN27122024003118003196ID1109035865 Legal Disclaimer: MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.Liverpool came from behind to beat Leicester City 3-1 on Boxing Day and extend their lead at the top of the Premier League table Liverpool have been warned that VAR's lengthy delay at the end of the 3-1 victory over Leicester City is the price that has to be paid for accuracy in the Premier League . Supporters were left frustrated late on when Cody Gakpo's goal was ruled out for an offside against Darwin Nunez in the build-up. The decision took three minutes to eventually decide on before the Stockley Park officials decided to agree with the on-field call. Soon after the incident, the Premier League took to social media to explain that the check had found Nunez to be in the offside position. Many fans have been left calling for semi-automated offsides to be introduced in the aftermath of this delay. This technology uses motion senses and cameras to adjudge whether a player is on or off. Analysing the decision on Sky Sports' Ref Watch, former Premier League referee Dermot Gallagher explained the delay was due to checks on Mohamed Salah's position too. Despite the time taken, Gallagher was keen to stress that semi-automated offsides should not be rushed through. "There were two checks, that's why it took so long," he explained. "People say it's infuriating, but this is what the people asked for. "Now you've given them the technology to get the decision right, this is the process, this is what we're told, this is what we've seen. We have come a long way in five years from where we were, we've got far more accurate decisions. "It is much, much better. Semi-automated offsides is a work in progress. "Maybe if it's going to take a long time, maybe wait until next season. When this is rolled out, it has to be 100 per cent, right now there are little tweaks needed." Semi-automated offsides have been used in major international tournaments and have proven to be quick at making decisions. However, 2025 is now the earliest that we expect to see it being used in the Premier League. In the end, the offside was inconsequential to Liverpool who now sit seven points clear at the top of the Premier League prior to Arsenal's clash with Ipswich Town on Friday night. Join our WhatsApp community, sign up to a newsletter or listen to our podcasts HERE
New Delhi, Dec 27 (PTI) The railway ministry on Friday dismissed as “fake” and “misleading” claims that a man travelled 250 kilometres from Itarsi to Jabalpur hiding on a train’s wheel axle. Railway officials said that someone shot the video of the man coming out of the wheel axle of a stationary train and circulated it with the misleading claim that he had to hide himself near the wheelset because he did not have money to buy tickets. “These reports are completely fake and baseless,” Dilip Kumar, Executive Director, Information and Publicity, Railway Board, said. “The person was just hiding near the wheel axle when the train was not moving. It is practically not possible for anyone to hide on the wheelset of a moving train as it moves along with the wheels,” he said. “Some news organisations and social media influencers picked it up and made it viral without verifying its authenticity,” Kumar added. PTI JP IJT This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content. var ytflag = 0;var myListener = function() {document.removeEventListener('mousemove', myListener, false);lazyloadmyframes();};document.addEventListener('mousemove', myListener, false);window.addEventListener('scroll', function() {if (ytflag == 0) {lazyloadmyframes();ytflag = 1;}});function lazyloadmyframes() {var ytv = document.getElementsByClassName("klazyiframe");for (var i = 0; i < ytv.length; i++) {ytv[i].src = ytv[i].getAttribute('data-src');}} Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Δ document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() );
Drone operators worry that anxiety over mystery sightings will lead to new restrictionsThe Dolphins' improbable path to the playoffs isn't in their hands, but they must do their part
MADISON — Three associates of President-elect Donald Trump made their first court appearances in Madison on Thursday on forgery charges stemming from the state’s fake elector scheme in 2020. Jim Troupis, Michael Roman and Kenneth Chesebro stand accused of orchestrating a plot to submit false paperwork saying Trump won the 2020 presidential election in Wisconsin. The Wisconsin Department of Justice has filed 11 felony fraud charges against each man. Democratic Attorney General Josh Kaul first announced a single forgery charge against each of the three Trump campaign advisors in June. Then on Tuesday, just two days before the men were scheduled to appear in court, the Department of Justice charged the men with 10 additional felonies — one for each of the fake electors who signed the certificate of votes. According to court filings, some of the Republican electors have told investigators that they believed the certificate of votes was a contingency plan in case a court ruled that Trump had won the race in Wisconsin. Messages obtained by investigators show how, despite President Joe Biden being declared the winner in Wisconsin, Troupis, Roman and Chesebro attempted to bring the false slate of electors to Congress to be counted on Jan. 6, 2021. Troupis, who was Trump’s attorney in Wisconsin in 2020, was the only defendant to appear in person on Thursday. The others dialed in by phone. Troupis told reporters he believes the fake electors were necessary for the Trump campaign to have legal standing in election challenges. “This is a political case. This has nothing to do with the law,” Troupis said after the hearing. “The attorney general has today doubled down on a vicious strategy to destroy our very faith in the system of justice by using the courts for his own personal political gain.” Troupis and Roman are asking a judge to dismiss the charges against them. Check out: Former Trump attorney charged over fake elector scheme calls cease political retribution Asked about Troupis’ assertion that the actions he took were par for the course in a close election, Kaul deferred to the judicial process. “The Wisconsin Department of Justice makes decisions in cases based on the facts and the law. In this case, like all other cases, we will litigate the issues in dispute in a court of law,” Kaul said in an emailed statement. Ahead of Thursday’s hearing, Troupis took to conservative radio, asking supporters to show up at the courthouse. Among the small crowd that turned out was former Republican Gov. Scott McCallum. He defended the actions of the three Trump associates. “The law was followed. They followed every direction that was given to them, and now they’re being punished for it,” McCallum said. After Trump’s victory in Wisconsin in this year’s presidential election, GOP electors are planning to meet in mid-December to cast their electoral votes. However, Wisconsin laws are not aligned with new federal requirements for when the vote should take place. Republicans asked a judge earlier this week to clarify whether their meeting should be held on Dec. 16, as state law requires, or Dec. 17, as federal law requires. It’s about time to watch on your time. Stream local news and weather 24/7 by searching for “TMJ4” on your device. Available for download on Roku, Apple TV, Amazon Fire TV, and more. Report a typo or errorRedfin, three days after the election, revised their mortgage rate estimate upward to 6.8%.
MLB shifts six 2025 Rays games to avoid weather issuesJets QB Aaron Rodgers open to pay cut but unsure if he wants to play next seasonSri Lanka’s ill-fated LRT – following a train of thought from policy derailment to being back on the right track (Part II of II)
ESPN Host Elle Duncan Taking Heat On Social Media For 'Classless' RantBroadcom earnings top estimates after AI fuels sales growthCentral Coast man facing court on online child abuse charges