/ ?!9 \4l4.ԥ}>gh|_#:NZAn innovative electrolyser design that uses steam to produce green hydrogen rather than water has completed its first successful road test in a real world setting. The technology – a modular assembly of tubes about half a metre long – has been installed at BlueScope’s Port Kembla Steelworks in New South Wales where it has run without incident for over 1000 hours. This by a team of 14 scientists from CSIRO and in partnership with Hadean Energy which has licensed the technology and has ambitions to build a 250 kWh demonstration system. Conventional hydrogen electrolysers work by splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen, but the new technology developed by CSIRO passes 750C waste heat generated in heavy industrial processes through a series of ceramic tubes. An electric current is run along the walls of these tubes which splits the high temperature steam into hydrogen and water. The modular design of these tubes promises to reduce the cost of manufacturing, reduces production costs by 30 percent, allowing the system to make hydrogen at less than 36 kWh a kilo. CSIRO Senior Principal Research Scientist and Group Leader Dr Sarb Giddey says the use of steam is important in lowering costs of green hydrogen. The lion’s share of variable production costs for renewable hydrogen are in electricity, and a 30 per cent reduction in the electricity required – by using this steam-based technology – could be a game changer for the industry. Giddey says that with the trial run serving as proof of concept, the question now was how to scale up the system to provide the amount of hydrogen needed for use applications such as iron and steelmaking, or ammonia production. “There are two factors that are really critical to decarbonising iron making and steel making – one is the cost of hydrogen, the other is the scale we can produce at,” Giddey said. “We are looking at tonnes and tonnes of hydrogen being produced. If you look at the scale required for iron and steel making, it’s a lot of hydrogen. You have to replace the coal.” According to the , the steel industry globally accounts for 2.8 gigatonnes of CO2 emissions each year, or 8 percent of total energy system emissions. Hydrogen is expected to be essential in helping to decarbonise iron and steelmaking processes but it is currently made using gas or coal. Some proposals have sought to use carbon, capture, utilisation and storage to remove the CO2 from the steel production process, but of the approach. Of the six proposed steelmaking projects that are seeking to rely on CCUS, the analysts found all lack transparency about key details on the projects including capture capacity and storage type. Two of three projects considered in “advanced development” do not have dates by which they expect to enter production. The world’s only operational commercial-scale CCUS project for steelmaking, the project in the United Arab Emirates, only manages to capture a quarter of its emissions, the analysts found. CSIRO’s green hydrogen technology has been licenced to Hadean Energy which is seeking to develop a modular design. A showcase of a 5kW demonstration unit as part of the Australia-UK Renewable Hydrogen Innovation Partnership is in planning. Under this partnership the company is working to build a small 5kW electrolyser for use in a UK .India's former prime minister Manmohan Singh dies aged 92Wiegman: England must push on after USA draw
The in 2010, under the directive of the then Vice-Chancellor, marked a defining moment of democratic suppression within the Valley’s premier academic institution. Disguised as “campus development,” this decision dismantled a vital platform for student representation, depriving the university of a mechanism that ensured accountability, equity, and dialogue. Fourteen years later, while Kashmir University has scaled new heights, securing an and prominent national rankings, the outdated rationale for banning student politics lingers like a spectre. It is disappointing that an institution priding itself on academic excellence continues to lag behind in fostering democratic practices, unlike other premier Indian universities that thrive on student activism and unionism. Under the leadership of the current Vice-Chancellor, whose governance style is lauded for being student-centric, Kashmir University is at a critical crossroads. Students, including this writer, have rekindled the demand for reinstating KUSU, taking their appeal to the Lieutenant Governor and Chancellor. The administration now has an opportunity to reverse this regressive decision and demonstrate that it values dialogue over coercion. Restoring KUSU is not an act of indulgence; it is a constitutional obligation. The continued suppression of student’s voices only deepens mistrust between the administration and its students, while reinstating the union would pave the way for collaborative problem-solving, fairness, and inclusivity in campus governance. For the ruling party, reinstating KUSU presents a golden political opportunity—a chance to connect with the Valley’s youth and showcase its commitment to empowering democratic processes. In a region where trust-building is paramount, this decision could be a masterstroke, demonstrating that the party stands for inclusion, dialogue, and the aspirations of young minds. With the current political landscape offering the mandate to enact bold changes, the reinstatement of KUSU would not only resonate across the Valley but also set a progressive precedent for educational institutions nationwide. Ignoring this demand risks perpetuating a narrative of suppression, whereas embracing it signals a commitment to the values of democracy and equity. A student union is not merely a body; it is the voice of the voiceless, a defender of rights, and a nursery of future leaders. A functional student union like KUSU is the cornerstone of a dynamic academic environment. It acts as a bridge between students and administration, addressing concerns such as hostel conditions, curriculum improvement, campus infrastructure and fair representation. Beyond resolving grievances, KUSU would foster leadership, civic engagement, and a culture of accountability. The union is a training ground for future leaders, enabling students to experience governance and decision-making firsthand. For an institution with an A+ NAAC ranking, reinstating KUSU is not just about honoring its democratic legacy but about creating a thriving, student-oriented campus environment. The time to act is now—to restore what was unjustly taken and to set Kashmir University on the path of inclusive excellence. A student union is the soul of an academic institution, where ideas are born, challenges are addressed, and leaders are forged.
World Series vision that got Nathan Eovaldi to the Rangers is the same one that got him to re-sign
Emboldened 'manosphere' accelerates threats and demeaning language toward women after US electionImmediately after Michigan defeated Ohio State this Saturday in Columbus, a massive brawl broke out at midfield. Apparently, the police needed to take drastic measures to break it up. Ohio State players were furious that Michigan wanted to plant a flag at midfield. While we understand why, it's hard to get mad after blowing a game where your team was favored by three touchdowns. That being said, punches were thrown as soon as the Wolverines tried to claim Ohio Stadium as their own. In an effort to defuse the tension, the cops used pepper spray on the field. Some Michigan players were spotted with tears in their eyes. Not only were players hit with pepper spray, some reporters were also struck in the crossfire. "Just got secondhand pepper sprayed," Pat Forde of Sports Illustrated wrote on X . Forde also shared a video of the wild scene at Ohio Stadium. pic.twitter.com/OotacVEVPI Ohio State coach Ryan Day was asked about this afternoon's brawl. His response was pretty underwhelming. "I don’t know all the details of it, but those guys were looking to put a flag on our field and our guys weren’t going to let that happen," Day told reporters . "Certainly we’re embarrassed about the loss, but we have some prideful guys." Michigan running back Kalel Mullings, on the other hand, said Ohio State has to learn how to lose with grace. Icon Sportswire/Getty Images "For such a great game, you hate to see stuff like that after the game," Mullings said . "It's just bad for the sport, it's bad for college football. At the end of the day though, some people gotta learn how to lose man. You can't be fighting and stuff just because you lost a game. We had 60 minutes and four quarters to do all that fighting. So now you want to fight? That's just wrong. It's bad for the game - classless, in my opinion. People got to be better." The Big Ten has not yet announced if players will be disciplined for their actions. At the very least, Michigan and Ohio State have to come forward and accept some responsibility for this mess. Related: Ryan Day Had Awful Response When Asked About Ohio State's Brawl With Michigan
Arrest, remand, bail: Allu Arjun's action packed day of unscripted dramaWould you take a date to a strip club? According to Travis Kelce - aka Mr. Taylor Swift - it's a sure-fire way to ensure a first date does NOT lead to a second. The Kansas City Chiefs superstar was sharing dating advice on his New Heights Podcast when a listener asked about the worst possible location for a date. Not shirking the question, Kelce - whose fame has skyrocketed since his relationship with the music sensation went public last year - responded: "Maybe don't take her to the strip club. Although some strip clubs do have really good wings I have heard. Don't know anything about it." In a light-hearted exchange on his podcast he followed up: "If she's not into sports, don't take her to a f****** sports game. The 35-year-old NFL ace added: "There's nothing worse than trying to teach somebody about something they don't want to be taught about." Although Kelce - who has been a regular cheering on Swift during her global Eras Tour., reciprocating her being a regular at Chiefs games - confidently added that he would be able to make any date memorable, declaring "I can make anything shake." But he was very quick to add: "Bottom of the barrel, no way in hell you're getting a second date if you take a girl there!" Following on from this the KC legend spoke with pride as he paid tribute to his girlfriend after her tour came to a close following a staggering 149 shows, finally finishing up in Vancouver earlier this month. During one heartwarming moment during the show, Kelce said: "Shout out to Tay. The unbelievable Eras Tour has finally come to an end. Obviously it's her music, her tour but that was a full production, it was the best tour in the world because of a lot of people. But mostly because of Taylor!" His brother, Jason Kelce, also recently spoke in glowing terms about his sibling's girlfriend as he thanked her for her hospitality after attending dates on the Eras Tour. He said on The Rich Eisen Show: "As much as Taylor has said she will take care of anybody that I ask for." Bottom of the barrel, no way in hell you're getting a second date if you take a girl there." She does say that, she's very... she's great but I still say no to everybody. I'm not gonna be the one to impose on that. I don't want to put that position out there. "She's been nothing but lovely to our family, she's a wonderful person and I don't want that to kind of be a dynamic."
In January 2025, Donald Trump will be sworn-in as the 47th President of the United States of America. Mr. Trump’s re-election, and subsequent return to office, have triggered curiosity and “nervousness” in many countries. However, in South Asia, he is likely to offer a distinct continuity. His ideology and foreign policy goals will continue to push for increased cooperation, collaboration, and consultation with India in South Asia even as his leadership style, decision-making nature, and management of great power politics will provide new opportunities and challenges. Factors in U.S.-India ties India and the United States have enjoyed an upward trajectory in their relationship since the beginning of the millennium. Acknowledging its leadership in the region, the U.S. even labelled India as a net-security provider in 2009. The Biden administration (2021-24) has emulated a similar outlook. With China’s increasing aggressiveness and assertiveness, India and the U.S. have strengthened their engagements and cooperation in South Asia. Through its Indo-Pacific strategy, the U.S. wants to supplement India’s regional leadership to counter China and maintain the values-based order. Its cooperation with India on the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) projects in Nepal and helping Sri Lanka out of its economic crisis, indicate this growing cooperation. Besides, Mr. Biden’s passive relations with Pakistan after withdrawing from Afghanistan helped India and the U.S. foster a mutual vision for the region. The relationship has not been free of dissonance and divergences. New Delhi’s primary objective of cooperating with the U.S. is to push back against China and offer alternative development partnerships. However, the Biden administration has selectively scrutinised some countries on democracy and human rights under the pretext of upholding a values-based order and pushing back China. While India supported the Sheikh Hasina government in Bangladesh and pragmatically engaged with Myanmar’s junta, the U.S. pressured both regimes, including imposing targeted sanctions. This pressure nudged them closer to China. Similarly, sanctioning Indian firms for collaborating with Russia and accusations of corruption against the Adani Group has faltered two Indian projects in Sri Lanka, leaving India to face the brunt and consequences of the decisions. There could be less irritants However, Mr. Trump’s return is likely to assuage these irritants. As in his first term, Mr. Trump has continued to hint at burden sharing, reciprocity, nationalism, and competing against China in his foreign policy. If Mr. Trump walks the talk, he will prioritise pushing back against China while giving less importance to human rights, democracy, and nation-building. He would also want India to take the lead in the region while the U.S. would supplement the same. This would leave less space for divergences and enhance collaborative policies between both countries. Another potential irritant between both countries was concerning their policies on Afghanistan and Pakistan. During his first term, Mr. Trump punished and cooperated with Pakistan and urged India to take an active role in finding a sustainable solution in Afghanistan. With the U.S.’s withdrawal from Afghanistan and Pakistan’s little strategic importance, this issue is of little dissonance now. During his first term, Mr. Trump promoted capacity building, development assistance, defence agreements, and cooperation with the South Asian countries. This nature of assistance would continue, given his ambitions to counter China and supplement India. Mr. Trump’s little focus on democracy, nation-building, and human rights (like in his first term) would also benefit Sri Lanka, where a new government is still looking for economic assistance and exploring a lasting solution to the Tamil issue. This approach could benefit Myanmar and the Taliban too, although it is unclear to what extent Washington would like to engage them. However, Bangladesh, which is undergoing a political transition under the new regime, will face challenges and a potential reduction in assistance. China and the region Mr. Trump’s confrontational approach to China will also put South Asian countries under more pressure. Given his erratic decisions, Washington will likely be less tolerant of South Asian countries’ agency and consistent playing of one great power against the other. Besides, the region’s consistent politicisation and ambiguity over investments, defence cooperation, and agreements will likely invite more pressure from the U.S. to seek reciprocity. However, his promise of bringing peace between Russia and Ukraine and resolving the crisis in West Asia (if successful) will help weakened South Asian economies to overcome their food and fuel inflationary pressures. As the world braces for Trump 2.0, South Asia will not be immune to the broader structural shifts. Yet, the region is likely to see more continuity. With India and the U.S. likely to increase their cooperation in South Asia and bridge their divergences, Mr. Trump’s ideology, leadership style, and management of great power politics will have opportunities and challenges for the region. How South Asian countries will cope with the new administration, even as they balance China and India, is yet to be seen. Harsh V. Pant is Vice-President for Studies and Foreign Policy at the Observer Research Foundation (ORF). Aditya Gowdara Shivamurthy is an Associate Fellow, Neighbourhood Studies, Observer Research Foundation Published - December 14, 2024 12:08 am IST Copy link Email Facebook Twitter Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit US PRESIDENTIAL POLLS / USA / India / international relations / Nepal / Sri Lanka / Pakistan / Afghanistan / China / Myanmar / Bangladesh / politics / economic sanction / corrections-and-clarifications / democracy / human rights / Russia-Ukraine Crisis / economy (general) / food / inflation and deflation / defenceBest TV of 2024: A modestly better lineup than usual, but why didn’t it feel that way?