golden empire jili slot

golden empire jili slot Empowered Funds LLC boosted its position in shares of ARC Document Solutions, Inc. ( NYSE:ARC – Free Report ) by 5.4% during the 3rd quarter, Holdings Channel reports. The institutional investor owned 255,092 shares of the business services provider’s stock after purchasing an additional 12,998 shares during the quarter. Empowered Funds LLC’s holdings in ARC Document Solutions were worth $862,000 at the end of the most recent quarter. Several other hedge funds and other institutional investors also recently made changes to their positions in the company. Redhawk Wealth Advisors Inc. boosted its holdings in ARC Document Solutions by 80.7% in the second quarter. Redhawk Wealth Advisors Inc. now owns 72,752 shares of the business services provider’s stock valued at $192,000 after acquiring an additional 32,487 shares during the last quarter. Ritholtz Wealth Management boosted its stake in shares of ARC Document Solutions by 16.3% in the 2nd quarter. Ritholtz Wealth Management now owns 55,586 shares of the business services provider’s stock valued at $147,000 after purchasing an additional 7,805 shares during the last quarter. Dimensional Fund Advisors LP grew its position in shares of ARC Document Solutions by 5.7% during the 2nd quarter. Dimensional Fund Advisors LP now owns 1,550,606 shares of the business services provider’s stock worth $4,094,000 after buying an additional 83,795 shares during the period. Renaissance Technologies LLC raised its stake in shares of ARC Document Solutions by 1.7% during the second quarter. Renaissance Technologies LLC now owns 2,858,142 shares of the business services provider’s stock worth $7,545,000 after buying an additional 48,245 shares during the last quarter. Finally, First Eagle Investment Management LLC lifted its holdings in ARC Document Solutions by 62.0% in the second quarter. First Eagle Investment Management LLC now owns 218,673 shares of the business services provider’s stock valued at $577,000 after buying an additional 83,708 shares during the period. 48.93% of the stock is owned by institutional investors and hedge funds. Analyst Ratings Changes ARC has been the subject of a number of analyst reports. StockNews.com initiated coverage on shares of ARC Document Solutions in a report on Monday, November 18th. They set a “strong-buy” rating for the company. Singular Research raised ARC Document Solutions to a “strong-buy” rating in a research note on Wednesday, August 21st. ARC Document Solutions Price Performance ARC Document Solutions stock opened at $3.39 on Friday. The firm has a market capitalization of $146.66 million, a price-to-earnings ratio of 30.82, a PEG ratio of 1.53 and a beta of 1.13. The company’s 50 day simple moving average is $3.39 and its 200 day simple moving average is $3.08. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.33, a current ratio of 1.49 and a quick ratio of 1.37. ARC Document Solutions, Inc. has a fifty-two week low of $2.56 and a fifty-two week high of $3.44. ARC Document Solutions Company Profile ( Free Report ) ARC Document Solutions, Inc, a digital printing company, provides digital printing and document-related services in the United States. It provides managed print services, that places, manages, and optimizes print and imaging equipment in customers' offices, job sites, and other facilities; and cloud-based document management software and other digital hosting services. Featured Articles Want to see what other hedge funds are holding ARC? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for ARC Document Solutions, Inc. ( NYSE:ARC – Free Report ). Receive News & Ratings for ARC Document Solutions Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for ARC Document Solutions and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .

Virginia Tech 87, Elon 69Stubblefield accounts for 4 TDs, South Carolina State runs past Norfolk State 53-21

Sean 'Diddy' Combs' third bid to be released on bail won't be decided until next week NEW YORK (AP) — Lawyers for Sean “Diddy” Combs tried for a third time Friday to persuade a judge to let him leave jail while he awaits his sex trafficking trial, but a decision won’t come until next week. Michael R. Sisak, The Associated Press Nov 22, 2024 1:51 PM Nov 22, 2024 2:05 PM Share by Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Print Share via Text Message King Combs, left, son, Janice Combs, center, mother, and Justin Dior Combs, right, son of Sean "Diddy" Combs arrive at Manhattan federal court, Friday, Nov. 22 2024, in New York. (AP Photo/Yuki Iwamura) NEW YORK (AP) — Lawyers for Sean “Diddy” Combs tried for a third time Friday to persuade a judge to let him leave jail while he awaits his sex trafficking trial, but a decision won’t come until next week. Judge Arun Subramanian said at a hearing that he will release his decision on Combs' latest request for bail after Combs’ lawyers and federal prosecutors file letters addressing outstanding issues. Those letters are due at noon on Monday, Subramanian said. Combs’ lawyers pitched having him await trial under around-the-clock surveillance either his mansion on an island near Miami Beach or — after the judge scoffed at that location — an apartment on Manhattan’s Upper East Side. Their plan essentially amounts to putting Combs on house arrest, with strict limits on who he has contact with. But prosecutors argue that Combs has routinely flouted jail rules and can't be trusted not to interfere with witnesses or the judicial process. “The argument that he’s a lawless person who doesn’t follow instructions isn’t factually accurate,” Combs lawyer Anthony Ricco argued. “The idea that he’s an out-of-control individual who has to be detained isn’t factually accurate.” Combs, 55, has pleaded not guilty to charges that he coerced and abused women for years with help from a network of associates and employees while silencing victims through blackmail and violence, including kidnapping, arson and physical beatings. His trial is slated to begin May 5. The Bad Boy Records founder remains locked up at a Brooklyn federal jail, where he spent his Nov. 4 birthday. Two other judges previously concluded that Combs would be a danger to the community if he is released and an appeals court judge last month denied Combs’ immediate release while a three-judge panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals weighs his bail request. Friday's hearing was the second time Combs was in court this week. On Tuesday, a judge blocked prosecutors from using as evidence papers that were seized from his cell during jail-wide sweep for contraband and weapons at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn. As he entered through a side door, Combs waved to relatives including his mother and several of his children in the courtroom gallery, tapping his hand to his heart and blowing kisses at them. He then hugged his lead attorney, Marc Agnifilo, before taking a seat at the defense table. He was not handcuffed or shackled and wore a beige jail uniform, occasionally pulling a pair of reading glasses from his pocket as he peered at papers in front of him. Prosecutors maintain that no bail conditions will mitigate the “risk of obstruction and dangerousness to others” of releasing Combs from jail. Prosecutors contend that while locked up the “I'll Be Missing You” artist has orchestrated social media campaigns aimed at tainting the jury pool. They allege that he has also attempted to publicly leak materials he thinks would be helpful to his case and is contacting potential witnesses via third parties. “Simply put, the defendant cannot be trusted,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Christy Slavik argued. Combs’ lawyer Teny Geragos countered that, given the strict release conditions proposed, “it would be impossible for him not to follow rules.” Michael R. Sisak, The Associated Press See a typo/mistake? Have a story/tip? This has been shared 0 times 0 Shares Share by Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Print Share via Text Message More The Mix Michael Bublé to host 2025 Juno Awards, Sum 41 to be inducted into Music Hall of Fame Nov 22, 2024 2:29 PM Alberta Premier Smith says passenger train system key to meeting tourism goals Nov 22, 2024 2:24 PM Extreme weather remains the wild card as Alberta aims to fix auto insurance system Nov 22, 2024 2:06 PM Featured Flyer

A federal law to shield journalists from unwarranted government snooping once enjoyed near universal support. It has lately become a political football — but it shouldn’t be. President-elect Donald Trump took to social media recently to urge Republicans in Congress to kill the PRESS Act, the shorthand name for the Protect Reporters from Exploitative State Spying Act. Until then, this bill enjoyed broad bipartisan support. What would the PRESS Act do? It would shield journalists from being compelled to reveal their confidential sources and other sensitive information gathered in the reporting process. It provides reasonable exceptions, however, in cases involving terrorism, other serious emergencies or journalists suspected of crimes. The PRESS Act passed the House in January with overwhelming support from both parties. Its chief sponsor, Rep. Kevin Kiley, R-California, reminded his colleagues then that “liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and journalists are often the first to expose government fraud, waste, abuse and encroachments on personal freedoms. In a free country, we need to make sure that the government cannot unmask journalists' sources without good cause, and that is why the need for this legislation is so strong." The PRESS Act has languished in the Senate, however, where it was sponsored by Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Oregon, and includes cosponsors Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-South Carolina, Mike Lee, R-Utah, and Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Illinois. Now, with Trump calling on GOP members of Congress to deep-six it, its fate hangs by a thread. We at the Society of Environmental Journalists urge the president-elect and members of his party to reconsider. Our group is a membership organization of 1,500 journalists who cover climate change and the most pressing environmental challenges of our time. Our members rely on their ability to protect sources and the information they provide to hold government officials and corporations accountable, report corruption, expose malfeasance and publicize the most important stories of our time. While some who question climate change might see our group's support of the PRESS Act as ample reason to oppose it, that’s akin to cutting off your nose to spite your face. As the bill’s advocates have pointed out, the PRESS Act would protect conservative, independent and nontraditional journalists just as much as it would those in the mainstream press. Indeed, one of the most outspoken advocates for the PRESS Act is Catherine Herridge, a former Fox News reporter facing fines — and possibly even jail time — for refusing to identify her source for her stories about the founder of a Virginia school who has ties to the Chinese People’s Liberation Army. In a recent appearance on NewsNation, Herridge said her reporting on those and other stories relied on confidential sources and “a credible pledge that I would protect their identity.” She said if she could sit down with Trump, she’d remind him of how he had praised her reporting eight years ago that found flaws in the investigation of Russian collusion in his 2016 election. “It’s not a political thing,” Herridge concluded. “It’s really a democracy thing.” For the sake of democracy and the First Amendment, we appeal to the Senate to pass the PRESS Act without further delay. It’s urgently needed and long overdue. Tim Wheeler is chair of the Society of Environmental Journalists' Freedom of Information Task Force and a former board member and president of the organization.

Andy Murray enters new chapter with Novak Djokovic as coach of long-time rival

Cesar Hernandez, who was sentenced in 2019 to 80 years to life with the possibility of parole for first-degree murder, escaped Monday morning shortly after arriving at the Kern County courthouse in Delano, a city of around 50,000 in central California. As of Thursday, he had still not been found. He was being transported to appear in court after pleading no contest to manufacturing a weapon and possessing alcohol or drugs in prison when he evaded staff and jumped out of the van, officials said. Cesar Guzmán, 32, was only blocks away at his barber shop from the intersection where Hernandez escaped. It’s been the “number one topic at the shop” since. “Everyday we talk about it,” Guzmán said. “The clients are, they’re scared because they haven’t found him. We’re really close to where it happened.” Delano has been inundated with a heavy law enforcement presence since Hernandez’s escape, with police knocking on doors and helicopters whirring overhead. Guzmán said it’s the first time something like this has happened in the town, where he has lived his whole life. Several local schools locked down Monday, and they remained closed through Thursday as the search continued, local school districts posted on Facebook. The city postponed its tree-lighting ceremony originally scheduled for Wednesday, and the Delano Chamber of Commerce delayed its annual Christmas parade scheduled for Thursday night. Hernandez remaining at large puts a damper on the festivities, which Guzmán and his family have attended every year. “Honestly, now we’re kind of like, ‘How can he get away from them? What the heck happened?’" Guzmán said. Hernandez, 34, was last seen wearing an orange top and pants. He is 5 feet, 5 inches tall, weighs about 160 pounds, and has brown eyes and black hair. He was transferred from Los Angeles County in June 2019. “Hernandez is considered dangerous,” Delano police said in a social media post. “If you see him, do not approach.” Anyone who sees Hernandez or has knowledge of his location is asked to contact law enforcement or call 911. On the other side of the country, another search was underway for the man who gunned down United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson in New York on Monday. Police were following tips related to his whereabouts, including searching two hostels where the man may have stayed.Arsenal crush Sporting in Champions League to extend revival

(CNN) — The number of US troops in Syria has regularly surged higher than the Pentagon has publicly disclosed since at least 2020, and in recent months increased to more than double the roughly 900 troops the US has long said are in Syria, multiple defense officials familiar with the matter told CNN. The Pentagon said last week that the additional troops beyond the 900 are “temporary.” But on Monday, Maj. Gen. Patrick Ryder, the Pentagon press secretary, acknowledged that the numbers of forces in Syria “in general have increased over time as the threat has increased to baseline forces.” Ryder first revealed on Thursday that the number of troops in Syria is around 2,000, “significantly higher than what we’ve been briefing” in recent months and years. He also said that he only found out about the larger footprint there in recent days. The Army’s director of plans, operations, and training distributed the true number internally earlier this month, two officials told CNN. It is not clear when exactly the troop numbers reached their current peak, but the US surged additional assets and personnel to the Middle East following last year’s October 7 attack by Hamas on Israel. On Monday, the Pentagon issued a new statement attempting to clarify the long-standing discrepancy about the number of troops in Syria. “In addition to the approximately 900 baseline troops, there are also approximately 1,100 U.S. military personnel in Syria that deploy for shorter durations as temporary enablers in support of force protection, transportation, maintenance, or other emerging operational requirements,” Ryder said. “The numbers of these additional temporary forces have fluctuated over the past several years based on mission needs but in general have increased over time as the threat has increased to baseline forces,” he added. Defense officials have long been reluctant to reveal the true troop numbers in Syria because it could risk angering neighboring partner countries, particularly Iraq, sources told CNN. When the Pentagon first acknowledged the larger troop presence, Ryder said there are “diplomatic and operational security considerations oftentimes with our deployments.” Syria isn’t the only country where the Pentagon has more troops deployed than it has previously said. In its statement Monday, the Pentagon acknowledged there may be more than 2,500 troops in Iraq, the baseline number the military has used for its military footprint in the country. But the Pentagon did not provide any additional details on how many more troops are in Iraq, only saying there are “some additional temporary enablers deployed on a rotational basis.” “However, due to operations security and diplomatic considerations, we do not have any more specifics to provide,” Ryder said in the statement. The vague reference to additional troops in Iraq leaves open the possibility of a significantly larger presence than was previously acknowledged, just as in Syria. The US military presence in Iraq is a sensitive issue for Iraqi officials, who have said publicly they want US troops out of the country. If the Iraqis saw the number of troops increasing in Syria, they’d fear the US was doing so in Iraq as well, officials explained, which it now appears may be the case. It is particularly delicate in the midst of negotiations about the future US military footprint in Iraq. For more than a year, Washington and Baghdad have engaged in a series of talks about the future of the US military presence in the country. In January, Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani made the goal of the discussions clear when he said the aim was to “end the presence of the international coalition forces in Iraq permanently.” The US military footprint in Syria relies on support from US troops in Iraq, and a larger presence in the former could necessitate more troops in the latter. Defense officials insist the Pentagon has not misled the public about the core number of troops in Syria, which they have said since 2020 is around 900. Most of those are special operations forces, one defense official said, and the military rarely acknowledges changes to special operations troop levels. Officials say the additional 1,100 or so that have been stationed there in recent months are “temporary enabling” forces, primarily with the Army, that are meant to augment the core presence with logistical and defensive help. But those troops are typically replaced as soon as they finish their rotations, which are frequently three months or less, so the total number has consistently surged above 900 over the years, officials said. Concealing the true number of US troops in Syria dates to Donald Trump’s first administration. In 2020, the outgoing US envoy to Syria, Jim Jeffrey, acknowledged that his team routinely misled senior military leaders about troop levels there, which suggests it was not exclusively military officials keeping the number under wraps. “We were always playing shell games to not make clear to our leadership how many troops we had there,” Jeffrey told Defense One at the time . Trump in 2019 had agreed to keep roughly 200 to 400 US troops in Syria, but the actual number was “a lot more,” Jeffrey said. There are even more civilian contractors in the country. A report from the Congressional Research Service said there were more than 5,400 contractors in Iraq and Syria in the second quarter of 2024. The-CNN-Wire TM & © 2024 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.The best women’s snow pants for skiing, sledding and beyond