内容为空 fortuner q interior

 

首页 > 

fortuner q interior

2025-01-20
fortuner q interior
fortuner q interior OCALA, Fla.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Nov 27, 2024-- AIM ImmunoTech Inc. (NYSE American: AIM) (“AIM” or the “Company”) today issued the following statement refuting the false and misleading claims recently made by a group of activist investors (collectively, the “Activist Group”) relating to their multi-year attempt to take over AIM’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) at the upcoming 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”), presently scheduled for December 17, 2024. Since 2016, the Board and management team have worked to overcome multiple obstacles, refocus the Company’s clinical development programs to high-value indications, improve its financial condition and lay the foundation for long-term shareholder value creation. To be clear, the Board and management are unhappy with the Company’s stock price performance – but they are doing everything possible to continue the significant momentum with Ampligen – which is ultimately what will create long-term value for all shareholders. Unfortunately, the Activist Group has accused AIM of lying about its historical share price. The Activist Group, however, is the one who is lying by claiming in its proxy statement: “On February 25, 2016, the day that Mr. Equels assumed the role of CEO, AIM’s stock closed at $87.15.” 1 The truth is that AIM’s stock has never traded anywhere near such a price: The reality is that the Activist Group has lied repeatedly to shareholders. Consider the following instances where its members have been found by the Delaware Court of Chancery (the “Court”) to have lied to or misled shareholders: 1. In 2023, the Activist Group’s 2023 nomination notice obscured the roles of Todd Deutsch, Franz Tudor and others in connection with the 2022 nomination effort and omitted important information regarding the Activist Group’s 2023 nomination effort. 2. The Activist Group also concealed key information related to their nominees’ governance track records on public boards in the 2023 nomination notice. 3. The Activist Group hid its true backers, Mr. Tudor and Michael Xirinachs, in the 2022 nomination notice. 4. The 2022 notice also disguised the true motivations of the Activist Group. Furthermore, the Court confirmed “ The plaintiff’s group – not the Board – are ‘ the ones engaging in manipulative conduct ” 10 by pursuing litigation against AIM. The Delaware Court of Chancery agreed with the Board in both 2022 and 2023. Following the Activist Group’s appeal, the Supreme Court of Delaware upheld the Court’s decision in favor of AIM earlier this year – yet the Activist Group continues to seek reimbursement from AIM for money its members spent on litigation against the Company that they lost . We believe it is highly problematic for a company with a market capitalization of approximately $13 million to reimburse the Activist Group for upwards of $8 million in litigation expenses, especially because the Delaware Supreme Court itself found that they aren’t entitled to them : “The case is not remanded for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs. It is closed. ” 11 AIM encourages shareholders to vote “ FOR ” ALL four of the Board’s incumbent candidates – Stewart L. Appelrouth , Nancy K. Bryan , Thomas K. Equels and Dr. William M. Mitchell – in connection with the Annual Meeting, on the WHITE universal proxy card. For more information on how to vote, visit: www.SafeguardAIM.com . *** About AIM ImmunoTech Inc. AIM ImmunoTech Inc. is an immuno-pharma company focused on the research and development of therapeutics to treat multiple types of cancers, immune disorders and viral diseases, including COVID-19. The Company’s lead product is a first-in-class investigational drug called Ampligen ® (rintatolimod), a dsRNA and highly selective TLR3 agonist immuno-modulator with broad spectrum activity in clinical trials for globally important cancers, viral diseases and disorders of the immune system. For more information, please visit aimimmuno.com and connect with the Company on X , LinkedIn , and Facebook . Forward-Looking Statements This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “PSLRA”). Words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “continue,” “believe,” “potential,” “upcoming” and other variations thereon and similar expressions (as well as other words or expressions referencing future events or circumstances) are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Many of these forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Data, pre-clinical success and clinical success seen to date does not guarantee that Ampligen will be approved as a treatment or therapy for any diseases or conditions. The Company urges investors to consider specifically the various risk factors identified in its most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, and any risk factors or cautionary statements included in any subsequent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this press release. Among other things, for those statements, the Company claims the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the PSLRA. The Company does not undertake to update any of these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur after the date hereof. Important Additional Information The Company, its directors and executive officers, Peter W. Rodino, III and Robert Dickey, IV, are deemed to be “participants” (as defined in Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) in the solicitation of proxies from the Company’s stockholders in connection with the Annual Meeting. The Company filed its definitive proxy statement (the “Definitive Proxy Statement”) and a WHITE universal proxy card with the SEC on November 4, 2024 in connection with such solicitation of proxies from the Company’s stockholders. STOCKHOLDERS OF THE COMPANY ARE STRONGLY ENCOURAGED TO READ SUCH DEFINITIVE PROXY STATEMENT, ACCOMPANYING WHITE UNIVERSAL PROXY CARD AND ALL OTHER DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE SEC CAREFULLY AND IN THEIR ENTIRETY AS THEY CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING. The Definitive Proxy Statement contains information regarding the identity of the participants, and their direct and indirect interests, by security holdings or otherwise, in the Company’s securities and can be found in the section titled “Principal Stockholders” of the Definitive Proxy Statement and available here . Information regarding subsequent changes to their holdings of the Company’s securities can be found in the SEC filings on Forms 3, 4, and 5, which are available on the Company’s website available here or through the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov . Stockholders will be able to obtain the Definitive Proxy Statement, any amendments or supplements thereto and other documents filed by the Company with the SEC at no charge at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov . Copies will also be available at no charge at the Company’s website at https://aimimmuno.com/sec-filings/ . ______________________________ 1 The Activist Group’s Definitive Proxy Statement . 2 See the March 2016 Form 8-K , filed with the SEC on March 16, 2016 (emphasis added). 3 See id. ; see also the NYSE American Company Guide . 4 See id. (emphasis added). 5 See December 28, 2023, Opinion of the Delaware Court of Chancery: https://courts.delaware.gov/Opinions/Download.aspx?id=357400 (emphasis added). 6 See id. (emphasis added). 7 See id. (emphasis added). 8 See id. (emphasis added). 9 Jorgl v. AIM ImmunoTech Inc. et al. , 2022 WL 16543834, at *32 (Del. Ch. Oct. 28, 2022). (emphasis added). 10 See December 28, 2023, Opinion of the Delaware Court of Chancery: https://courts.delaware.gov/Opinions/Download.aspx?id=357400 (emphasis added). 11 July 29, 2024, Order on Motion for Reargument of the Delaware Supreme Court. View source version on businesswire.com : https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241127594943/en/ CONTACT: Investor Contact: JTC Team, LLC Jenene Thomas 908-824-0775 AIM@jtcir.com Media Contact: Longacre Square Partners Joe Germani / Miller Winston AIM@longacresquare.com KEYWORD: FLORIDA DELAWARE UNITED STATES NORTH AMERICA INDUSTRY KEYWORD: BIOTECHNOLOGY INFECTIOUS DISEASES HEALTH PHARMACEUTICAL ONCOLOGY SOURCE: AIM ImmunoTech Inc. Copyright Business Wire 2024. PUB: 11/27/2024 03:30 PM/DISC: 11/27/2024 03:29 PM http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20241127594943/en

DENVER (AP) — Amid renewed interest in the killing of JonBenet Ramsey triggered in part by a new Netflix documentary, police in Boulder, Colorado, refuted assertions this week that there is viable evidence and leads about the 1996 killing of the 6-year-old girl that they are not pursuing. Read this article for free: Already have an account? As we navigate through unprecedented times, our journalists are working harder than ever to bring you the latest local updates to keep you safe and informed. Now, more than ever, we need your support. Starting at $14.99 plus taxes every four weeks you can access your Brandon Sun online and full access to all content as it appears on our website. or call circulation directly at (204) 727-0527. Your pledge helps to ensure we provide the news that matters most to your community! DENVER (AP) — Amid renewed interest in the killing of JonBenet Ramsey triggered in part by a new Netflix documentary, police in Boulder, Colorado, refuted assertions this week that there is viable evidence and leads about the 1996 killing of the 6-year-old girl that they are not pursuing. Read unlimited articles for free today: Already have an account? DENVER (AP) — Amid renewed interest in the killing of JonBenet Ramsey triggered in part by a new Netflix documentary, police in Boulder, Colorado, refuted assertions this week that there is viable evidence and leads about the 1996 killing of the 6-year-old girl that they are not pursuing. JonBenet Ramsey, who competed in beauty pageants, was found dead in the basement of her family’s home in the college town of Boulder the day after Christmas in 1996. Her body was found several hours after her mother called 911 to say her daughter was missing and a ransom note had been left behind. The details of the crime and video footage of JonBenet competing in pageants propelled the case into one of the highest-profile mysteries in the United States. The police comments came as part of their annual update on the investigation, a month before the 28th anniversary of JonBenet’s killing. Police said they released it a little earlier due to the increased attention on the case, apparently referring to the three-part Netflix series “Cold Case: Who Killed JonBenet Ramsey.” In a video statement, Boulder Police Chief Steve Redfearn said the department welcomes news coverage and documentaries about the killing of JonBenet, who would have been 34 this year, as a way to generate possible new leads. He said the department is committed to solving the case but needs to be careful about what it shares about the investigation to protect a possible future prosecution. “What I can tell you though, is we have thoroughly investigated multiple people as suspects throughout the years and we continue to be open-minded about what occurred as we investigate the tips that come into detectives,” he said. The Netflix documentary focuses on the mistakes made by police and the “media circus” surrounding the case. JonBenet was bludgeoned and strangled. Her death was ruled a homicide, but nobody was ever prosecuted. Police were widely criticized for mishandling the early investigation into her death amid speculation that her family was responsible. However, a prosecutor cleared her parents, John and Patsy Ramsey, and brother Burke in 2008 based on new DNA evidence from JonBenet’s clothing that pointed to the involvement of an “unexplained third party” in her slaying. The announcement by former district attorney Mary Lacy came two years after Patsy Ramsey died of cancer. Lacy called the Ramseys “victims of this crime.” John Ramsey has continued to speak out for the case to be solved. In 2022, he supported an online petition asking Colorado’s governor to intervene in the investigation by putting an outside agency in charge of DNA testing in the case. In the Netflix documentary, he said he has been advocating for several items that have not been prepared for DNA testing to be tested and for other items to be retested. He said the results should be put through a genealogy database. In recent years, investigators have identified suspects in unsolved cases by comparing DNA profiles from crime scenes and to DNA testing results shared online by people researching their family trees. In 2021, police said in their annual update that DNA hadn’t been ruled out to help solve the case, and in 2022 noted that some evidence could be “consumed” if DNA testing is done on it. Last year, police said they convened a panel of outside experts to review the investigation to give recommendations and determine if updated technologies or forensic testing might produce new leads. In the latest update, Redfearn said that review had ended but that police continue to work through and evaluate a “lengthy list of recommendations” from the panel. ____ Amy Beth Hanson contributed to this report from Helena, Montana. Advertisement AdvertisementInvesting.com -- Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (NASDAQ:CRDO) on Monday reported a 64% surge in second-quarter revenue, driven by robust demand for its connectivity solutions fueled by increasing AI deployments. The company also narrowed its quarterly loss Credo's shares soared 31% in after-market trading. The cable maker posted revenue of $72 million for the quarter ended Nov. 2, a substantial year-over-year increase. Its GAAP net loss was trimmed to $0.03 per share, compared to a loss of $0.04 per share in the same period a year earlier. Credo is projecting third-quarter revenue between $115 million and $125 million, with GAAP gross margin expected to range from 60.6% to 62.6%. The company anticipates operating expenses of $58.6 million to $60.6 million on a GAAP basis. Shares of the company were up 31% in the aftermarket trading. Related Articles Credo shares surge after 64% jump in revenue, narrowed quarterly loss U.S. stocks mixed at close of trade; Dow Jones Industrial Average down 0.29% Mexico stocks higher at close of trade; S&P/BMV IPC up 1.24%

None

The incident has raised serious questions about the practices and standards of the tourism industry, particularly when it comes to the treatment of elderly and vulnerable individuals. It serves as a stark reminder of the importance of thorough background checks, proper training, and oversight of tour operators to ensure the safety and well-being of all customers.NoneSincerely,

End of Day One at Scottish Open! China with Four Wins and Three Losses, Chinese Contingent Shines with Six Wins in Seven Matches, O'Sullivan Withdraws China's performance in the opening day of the Scottish Open snooker tournament showcased a mix of determination, skill, and resilience as the Chinese contingent secured four wins and suffered three losses, with an impressive six wins out of seven Top 16 matches. The highlight of the day came as snooker legend Ronnie O'Sullivan withdrew from the competition, paving the way for the Chinese players to further showcase their talent on the world stage.The Chinese players demonstrated exceptional form and strategic prowess throughout the day, with notable victories from the likes of Ding Junhui, Yan Bingtao, Zhou Yuelong, and Zhao Xintong. Each victory was a testament to the dedication and hard work of these players, who have been honing their skills and competing at the highest levels of the sport.

As winter approaches and the temperatures drop, let us all take a moment to reflect on the power of neighborly love and the importance of looking out for one another. In a society where we are often encouraged to focus on our own needs and desires, let us not forget the simple joy that comes from reaching out to help those around us.SEOUL, South Korea (AP) — The president of South Korea early Wednesday lifted the martial law he imposed on the country hours earlier, bending to political pressure after a tense night in which troops surrounded parliament and lawmakers voted to reject military rule. President Yoon Suk Yeol, who appeared likely to be impeached over his actions, imposed martial law late Tuesday out of frustration with the opposition, vowing to eliminate “anti-state” forces as he struggles against opponents who control parliament and that he accuses of sympathizing with communist North Korea. Police and military personnel were seen leaving the grounds of parliament following the bipartisan vote to overrule the president, and the declaration was formally lifted around 4:30 a.m. during a Cabinet meeting. Parliament acted swiftly after martial law was imposed, with National Assembly Speaker Woo Won Shik declaring that the law was “invalid” and that lawmakers would “protect democracy with the people.” In all, martial law was in effect for about six hours. The president’s surprising move harkened back to an era of authoritarian leaders that the country has not seen since the 1980s, and it was immediately denounced by the opposition and the leader of Yoon’s own conservative party. Lee Jae-myung , leader of the liberal Democratic Party, which holds the majority in the 300-seat parliament, said the party’s lawmakers would remain in the Assembly’s main hall until Yoon formally lifted his order. Woo applauded how troops quickly left the Assembly after the vote. “Even with our unfortunate memories of military coups, our citizens have surely observed the events of today and saw the maturity of our military,” Woo said. While announcing his plan to lift martial law, Yoon continued to criticize parliament’s attempts to impeach key government officials and senior prosecutors. He said lawmakers had engaged in “unscrupulous acts of legislative and budgetary manipulation that are paralyzing the functions of the state.” Jo Seung-lae, a Democratic lawmaker, claimed that security camera footage following Yoon’s declaration showed that troops moved in a way that suggested they were trying to arrest Lee, Woo and even Han Dong-hoon, the leader of Yoon’s People Power Party. Officials from Yoon’s office and the Defense Ministry did not respond to requests for comment early Wednesday. Seemingly hundreds of protesters gathered in front of the Assembly, waving banners and calling for Yoon’s impeachment. Some protesters scuffled with troops ahead of the lawmakers’ vote, but there were no immediate reports of injuries or major property damage. At least one window was broken as troops attempted to enter the Assembly building. One woman tried unsuccessfully to pull a rifle away from one of the soldiers, while shouting “Aren’t you embarrassed?” Under South Korea’s constitution, the president can declare martial law during “wartime, war-like situations or other comparable national emergency states” that require the use of military force to maintain peace and order. It was questionable whether South Korea is currently in such a state. When martial law is declared, “special measures” can be employed to restrict freedom of press, freedom of assembly and other rights, as well as the power of courts. The constitution also states that the president must oblige when the National Assembly demands the lifting of martial law with a majority vote. Following Yoon’s announcement of martial law, South Korea’s military proclaimed that parliament and other political gatherings that could cause “social confusion” would be suspended, South Korea’s Yonhap news agency said. The military said anyone who violated the decree could be arrested without a warrant. In Washington, the White House said the U.S. was “seriously concerned” by the events in Seoul. A spokesperson for the National Security Council said President Joe Biden’s administration was not notified in advance of the martial law announcement and was in contact with the South Korean government. Pentagon spokesman Maj. Gen. Pat Ryder said there was no effect on the more than 27,000 U.S. service members based in South Korea. The South Korean military also said that the country’s striking doctors should return to work within 48 hours, Yonhap said. Thousands of doctors have been striking for months over government plans to expand the number of students at medical schools. Soon after martial law was declared, the parliament speaker called on his YouTube channel for all lawmakers to gather at the National Assembly. He urged military and law enforcement personnel to “remain calm and hold their positions. All 190 lawmakers who participated in the vote supported the lifting of martial law. At one point, television footage showed police officers blocking the entrance of the National Assembly and helmeted soldiers carrying rifles in front of the building. An Associated Press photographer saw at least three helicopters, likely from the military, that landed inside the Assembly grounds, while two or three helicopters circled above the site. The leader of Yoon’s conservative party called the decision to impose martial law “wrong.” Lee, who narrowly lost to Yoon in the 2022 presidential election, said Yoon’s announcement was “illegal and unconstitutional.” Yoon said during a televised speech that martial law would help “rebuild and protect” the country from “falling into the depths of national ruin.” He said he would “eradicate pro-North Korean forces and protect the constitutional democratic order.” “I will eliminate anti-state forces as quickly as possible and normalize the country,” he said, while asking the people to believe in him and tolerate “some inconveniences.” Yoon — whose approval rating dipped in recent months — has struggled to push his agenda against an opposition-controlled parliament since taking office in 2022. His party has been locked in an impasse with the liberal opposition over next year’s budget bill. The opposition has also attempted to impeach three top prosecutors, including the chief of the central Seoul prosecutors’ office, in what the conservatives have called a vendetta against their criminal investigations of Lee, who has been seen as the favorite for the next presidential election in 2027 in opinion polls. During his televised announcement, Yoon also described the opposition as “shameless pro-North Korean anti-state forces who are plundering the freedom and happiness of our citizens.” He did not elaborate. Yoon has taken a hard line on North Korea over its nuclear ambitions, departing from the policies of his liberal predecessor, Moon Jae-in, who pursued inter-Korean engagement. Yoon has also dismissed calls for independent investigations into scandals involving his wife and top officials, drawing quick, strong rebukes from his political rivals. Yoon’s move was the first declaration of martial law since the country’s democratization in 1987. The country’s last previous martial law was in October 1979, following the assassination of former military dictator Park Chung-hee. Sydney Seiler, Korean chair at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, argued that the move was symbolic for Yoon to express his frustration with the opposition-controlled parliament. “He has nothing to lose,” said Seiler, comparing Yoon’s move to the Hail Mary pass in American football, with a slim chance of success. Now Yoon faces likely impeachment, a scenario that was also possible before he made the bold move, Seiler said. Natalia Slavney, research analyst at the Stimson Center’s 38 North website that focuses on Korean affairs, said Yoon’s imposition of martial law was “a serious backslide of democracy" that followed a “worrying trend of abuse” since he took office in 2022. South Korea “has a robust history of political pluralism and is no stranger to mass protests and swift impeachments,” Slavney said, citing the example of former President Park Geun-hye, the country’s first female president, who was ousted from office and imprisoned for bribery and other crimes in 2017 . Associated Press writers Hyung-jin Kim in Seoul, South Korea, and Matt Lee, Didi Tang and Tara Copp in Washington contributed to this report.Of course, the decision to purchase the "Black Myth" co-branded cola ultimately comes down to personal preference. If you're a fan of the "Black Myth: Wukong" game and appreciate the creative synergy between gaming and consumer products, this limited edition cola may be a must-have addition to your collection. On the other hand, if you're a cola connoisseur with a curiosity for new and innovative flavors, the "Black Myth" cola offers a unique tasting experience that you won't find elsewhere.

Previous:
Next: fortuno dental clinic