Kenosha schools eye early costs to start security upgradesNEW YORK — President-elect Donald Trump’s lawyers formally asked a judge to throw out his hush money criminal conviction, arguing continuing the case would present unconstitutional “disruptions to the institution of the Presidency.” In a filing made public Tuesday, Trump’s lawyers told Manhattan Judge Juan M. Merchan that dismissal is warranted because of the “overwhelming national mandate granted to him by the American people on November 5, 2024.” They also cited President Joe Biden’s recent pardon of his son, Hunter Biden, who had been convicted of tax and gun charges. “President Biden asserted that his son was ‘selectively, and unfairly, prosecuted,’ and ‘treated differently,’” Trump’s legal team wrote. The Manhattan district attorney, they claimed, had engaged in the type of political theater “that President Biden condemned.” Prosecutors will have until Dec. 9 to respond. They have said they will fight any efforts to dismiss the case but have indicated a willingness to delay the sentencing until after Trump’s second term ends in 2029. In their filing Monday, Trump’s attorneys dismissed the idea of holding off sentencing until Trump is out of office as a “ridiculous suggestion.” Following Trump’s election victory last month, Merchan halted proceedings and indefinitely postponed his sentencing, previously scheduled for late November, to allow the defense and prosecution to weigh in on the future of the case. He also delayed a decision on Trump’s prior bid to dismiss the case on immunity grounds. Trump has been fighting for months to reverse his conviction on 34 counts of falsifying business records to conceal a $130,000 payment to porn actor Stormy Daniels to suppress her claim that they had sex a decade earlier. He says they did not and denies any wrongdoing. Taking a swipe at Bragg and New York City, as Trump often did throughout the trial, the filing argues that dismissal would also benefit the public by giving him and “the numerous prosecutors assigned to this case a renewed opportunity to put an end to deteriorating conditions in the City and to protect its residents from violent crime.” Clearing Trump, the lawyers added, would also allow him to “to devote all of his energy to protecting the Nation.” The defense filing was signed by Trump lawyers Todd Blanche and Emil Bove, who represented Trump during the trial and have since been selected by the president-elect to fill senior roles at the Justice Department. A dismissal would erase Trump’s historic conviction, sparing him the cloud of a criminal record and possible prison sentence. Trump is the first former president to be convicted of a crime and the first convicted criminal to be elected to the office. Trump takes office on Jan. 20. Merchan hasn’t set a timetable for a decision. Merchan could also decide to uphold the verdict and proceed to sentencing, delay the case until Trump leaves office, wait until a federal appeals court rules on Trump’s parallel effort to get the case moved out of state court or choose some other option. Prosecutors had cast the payout as part of a Trump-driven effort to keep voters from hearing salacious stories about him. Trump’s then-lawyer Michael Cohen paid Daniels. Trump later reimbursed him, and Trump’s company logged the reimbursements as legal expenses — concealing what they really were, prosecutors alleged. Trump has pledged to appeal the verdict if the case is not dismissed. He and his lawyers said the payments to Cohen were properly categorized as legal expenses for legal work. A month after the verdict, the Supreme Court ruled that ex-presidents can’t be prosecuted for official acts — things they did in the course of running the country — and that prosecutors can’t cite those actions to bolster a case centered on purely personal, unofficial conduct. Trump’s lawyers cited the ruling to argue that the hush money jury got some improper evidence, such as Trump’s presidential financial disclosure form, testimony from some White House aides and social media posts made during his first term. Prosecutors disagreed and said the evidence in question was only “a sliver” of their case. If the verdict stands and the case proceeds to sentencing, Trump’s punishments would range from a fine to probation to up to four years in prison — but it’s unlikely he’d spend any time behind bars for a first-time conviction involving charges in the lowest tier of felonies. Because it is a state case, Trump would not be able to pardon himself once he returns to office. Presidential pardons apply only to federal crimes.The big picture: Most hydrogen production still relies on natural gas. However, a new technique that uses only sunlight and water could allow humanity to move away from using fossil fuels to produce cleaner energy. Researchers at Shinshu University in Japan have built a novel reactor to manufacture renewable hydrogen fuel directly from sunlight and water. It's still an early prototype, but the system could eventually provide a way to produce zero-emission fuel cheaply and sustainably. The reactor is 1,076 sq ft and employs unique photocatalytic panels to split water molecules into hydrogen and oxygen. This conversion leverages a two-step process. First, the reactor extracts oxygen. The second step separates the hydrogen atoms. The device can then siphon off the hydrogen and store it as a clean-burning fuel for powering vehicles, generators, or other machines. This method differs from today's "one-step" catalysts that split water into hydrogen and oxygen in one go. Although the traditional method is easier, it is also terribly inefficient because the hydrogen fuel requires refinement using natural gas. The team initially tested the reactor with UV light, which showed promise. Under actual sunlight, it yielded even better results, with around 50 percent higher solar energy conversion. The system sounds quite promising. However, there's a catch. The reactor only converts about one percent of sunlight into hydrogen fuel under standard simulated conditions. That's an improvement over previous attempts, but it's still too low for wide-scale adoption. The researchers note that an approximately five percent efficiency is needed to make it commercially viable. The scientists believe that increasing the reactor scale and developing new, higher-performing photocatalysts is critical. However, achieving viable efficiency will require a broader scientific effort focused on enhancing the photocatalysts. "The most important aspect to develop is the efficiency of solar-to-chemical energy conversion by photocatalysts," senior author Kazunari Domen said. "If it is improved to a practical level, many researchers will work seriously on the development of mass production technology and gas separation processes, as well as large-scale plant construction. This will also change the way many people, including policymakers, think about solar energy conversion, and accelerate the development of infrastructure, laws, and regulations related to solar fuels." Despite the remaining technical hurdles, the concept shows great promise. If scientists can refine the catalysts and scale up the reactors, we could be getting our fuel fix from two of the most plentiful resources on Earth rather than finite fossil fuels. Masthead credit: Philip Graves
It is an ambitious social experiment of our moment in history—one that experts say could accomplish something that parents, schools and other governments have attempted with varying degrees of success: keeping kids off social media until they turn 16. Australia’s new law, approved by its Parliament last week, is an attempt to swim against many tides of modern life—formidable forces like technology, marketing, globalization and, of course, the iron will of a teenager. And like efforts of the past to protect kids from things that parents believe they’re not ready for, the nation’s move is both ambitious and not exactly simple, particularly in a world where young people are often shaped, defined and judged by the online company they keep. The ban won’t go into effect for another year. But how will Australia be able to enforce it? That’s not clear, nor will it be easy. TikTok, Snapchat and Instagram have become so ingrained in young people’s lives that going cold turkey will be difficult. Other questions loom. Does the ban limit kids’ free expression and—especially for those in vulnerable groups—isolate them and curtail their opportunity to connect with members of their community? And how will social sites verify people’s ages, anyway? Can’t kids just get around such technicalities, as they so often do? This is, after all, the 21st century—an era when social media is the primary communications tool for most of those born in the past 25 years who, in a fragmented world, seek the common cultures of trends, music and memes. What happens when big swaths of that fall away? Is Australia’s initiative a good, long-time-coming development that will protect the vulnerable, or could it become a well-meaning experiment with unintended consequences? Platforms will be held liable The law will make platforms including TikTok, Facebook, Snapchat, Reddit, X and Instagram liable for fines of up to 50 million Australian dollars ($33 million) for systemic failures to prevent children younger than 16 from holding accounts. “It’s clear that social media companies have to be held accountable, which is what Australia is trying to do,” said Jim Steyer, president and CEO of the nonprofit Common Sense Media. Leaders and parents in countries around the world are watching Australia’s policy closely as many seek to protect young kids from the internet’s dangerous corners—and, not incidentally, from each other. Most nations have taken different routes, from parental consent requirements to minimum age limits. Many child safety experts, parents and even teens who have waited to get on social media consider Australia’s move a positive step. They say there’s ample reason to ensure that children wait. “What’s most important for kids, just like adults, is real human connection. Less time alone on the screen means more time to connect, not less,” said Julie Scelfo, the founder of Mothers Against Media Addiction, or MAMA, a grassroots group of parents aimed at combatting the harms of social media to children. “I’m confident we can support our kids in interacting in any number of ways aside from sharing the latest meme.” The harms to children from social media have been well documented in the two decades since Facebook’s launch ushered in a new era in how the world communicates. Kids who spend more time on social media, especially as tweens or young teenagers, are more likely to experience depression and anxiety, according to multiple studies—though it is not yet clear if there is a causal relationship. What’s more, many are exposed to content that is not appropriate for their age, including pornography and violence, as well as social pressures about body image and makeup. They also face bullying, sexual harassment and unwanted advances from their peers as well as adult strangers. Because their brains are not fully developed, teenagers, especially younger ones the law is focused on, are also more affected by social comparisons than adults, so even happy posts from friends can send them into a negative spiral. What unintended harms could be caused? Many major initiatives, particularly those aimed at social engineering, can produce side effects—often unintended. Could that happen here? What, if anything, do kids stand to lose by separating kids and the networks in which they participate? Paul Taske, associate director of litigation at the tech lobbying group NetChoice, says he considers the ban “one of the most extreme violations of free speech on the world stage today” even as he expressed relief that the First Amendment prevents such law in the United States “These restrictions would create a massive cultural shift,” Taske said. “Not only is the Australian government preventing young people from engaging with issues they’re passionate about, but they’re also doing so even if their parents are ok with them using digital services,” he said. “Parents know their children and their needs the best, and they should be making these decisions for their families—not big government. That kind of forcible control over families inevitably will have downstream cultural impacts.” David Inserra, a fellow for Free Expression and Technology, Cato Institute, called the bill “about as useful as an ashtray on a motorbike” in a recent blog post. While Australia’s law doesn’t require “hard verification” such as an uploaded ID, he said, it calls for effective “age assurance.” He said no verification system can ensure accuracy while also protecting privacy and not impacting adults in the process. Privacy advocates have also raised concerns about the law’s effect on online anonymity, a cornerstone of online communications—and something that can protect teens on social platforms. “Whether it be religious minorities and dissidents, LGBTQ youth, those in abusive situations, whistleblowers, or countless other speakers in tricky situations, anonymous speech is a critical tool to safely challenge authority and express controversial opinions,” Inserra said. A spot check of kids at one mall in the Australian city of Brisbane on Wednesday didn’t turn up a great deal of worry, though. “Social media is still important because you get to talk to people, but I think it’s still good that they’re like limiting it,” said Swan Son, a 13-year-old student at Brisbane State High School. She said she has had limited exposure to social media and wouldn’t really miss it for a couple of years. Her parents already enforce a daily one-hour limit. And as for her friends? “I see them at school every day, so I think I’ll be fine.” Conor Negric, 16, said he felt he’d dodged a bullet because of his age. Still, he considers the law reasonable. “I think 16 is fine. Some kids, I know some kids like 10 who’re on Instagram, Snapchat. I only got Instagram when I was 14.” His mom, Sive Negric, who has two teenage sons, said she was happy for her boys to avoid exposure to social media too early: “That aspect of the internet, it’s a bit ‘meanland.’” Other countries are trying to figure it out, too Parents in Britain and across Europe earlier this year organized on platforms such as WhatsApp and Telegram to promise not to buy smartphones for children younger than 12 or 13. This approach costs almost no money and requires no government enforcement. In the United States, some parents are keeping kids off social media either informally or as part of an organized campaign such as Wait Until 8th, a group that helps parents delay kids’ access to social media and phones. This fall, Norway announced plans to ban kids under 15 from using social media, while France is testing a smartphone ban for kids under 15 in a limited number of schools—a policy that could be rolled out nationwide if successful. US lawmakers have held multiple congressional hearings—most recently in January—on child online safety. Still, the last federal law aimed at protecting children online was enacted in 1998, six years before Facebook’s founding. In July, the US Senate overwhelmingly passed legislation designed to protect children from dangerous online content, pushing forward with what would be the first major effort by Congress in decades to hold tech companies more accountable. But the Kids Online Safety Act has since stalled in the House. While several states have passed laws requiring age verification, those are stuck in court. Utah became the first state to pass laws regulating children’s social media use in 2023. In September, a judge issued the preliminary injunction against the law, which would have required social media companies to verify the ages of users, apply privacy settings and limit some features. NetChoice has also obtained injunctions temporarily halting similar laws in several other states. And last May, US Surgeon General Vivek Murthy said there is insufficient evidence to show social media is safe for kids. He urged policymakers to treat social media like car seats, baby formula, medication and other products children use. “Why should social media products be any different? Scelfo said. “Parents cannot possibly bear the entire responsibility of keeping children safe online, because the problems are baked into the design of the products.” Image credits: Generative Illustration: Emilio Manzaneque Crespo via Dreamstime.com
What Man Utd Fans Are Saying About Leny Yoro After His Premier League DebutEnvironment Don't miss out on the headlines from Environment. Followed categories will be added to My News. Millions of Australians have been urged to stay alert on Boxing Day as scorching temperatures intensify dangerous bushfires across the country. Several states are battling bushfires, with hot, dry and windy conditions spreading throughout Western Australia, Victoria and NSW. As many holidaymakers are expected to hit the roads on Boxing Day, authorities have urged travellers to be prepared by downloading emergency apps ahead of time. In Western Australia, total fire bans have been issued in Avon, Leseur, Midwest Coast, Midwest Inland, Mortlock, Swan Inland North, Swan Inland South, and Yarra Yarra, which have been classified as “extreme”. Residents have been urged to leave as multiple bushfires continue raging across western areas of regional Victoria. Picture: Supplied Western regions of Victoria are expected to be hit hardest by Thursday’s hot weather. Picture: CFA There are 20 bushfires burning in NSW, which have been aided by the hot and windy conditions passing over the state, particularly in the inland and northeastern regions of the state. The elevated fire danger warnings have been triggered by fresh and gusty northwest to southwest winds, combined with hot and dry conditions. On Monday, a total fire ban was issued for the Northern Slopes, North Western, Greater Hunter and Greater Sydney regions, encompassing the Sydney CBD and its surrounds. Most of Victoria has been issued a high fire danger warning on Monday morning, with residents in Mallee, Northern Country, Wimmera, North Central, North East, Central and South West. Residents in Melbourne have also been advised to take extra caution as temperatures increase over the week. A “catastrophic” fire danger will be issued for Wimmera on Thursday, while Mallee, Northern Country, North Central, Central, and South West regions will be issued with extreme fire danger. A high fire danger will be in effect for residents in North East, East, West and South Gippsland. Hundreds of firefighters have been working to control the flames. Picture: Supplied It comes as a large raging bushfire, which was sparked by a lightning strike in the Grampians Natinal Park on Thursday, tripled in size between Friday and Saturday, with flames spreading over 36,000 hectares with a fire perimeter of 192kms. More than 300 firefighters are battling the blaze, though the Victorian Country Fire Authroity (CFA) said it could take weeks to put out the fire; the “very steep” and difficult terrain is making it more difficult for firefighters to control the blaze. Firefighters will continue to work on the blaze in the lead-up to Boxing Day on Thursday, which is anticipated to reach 39C in the western regions of Victoria. “Boxing Day is a big travel day right across the state, so we urge those travelling to download the VicEmergency app before you go,” Victorian Country Fire Authority’s deputy chief officer Garry Cook said. Backburning operations are currently underway in nearby towns to prevent the spread of further fires. However, VicEmergency incident controller Aaron Kennedy said the dry conditions made it difficult to keep the blaze under control. “Our firefighting operations have been hampered by quite significant winds and an underlying fuel dryness,” he said. The hot, dry and windy weather has created the perfect conditions for bushfires. Picture: Supplied The upcoming hot and windy conditions across Victoria this week will only make it more difficult to battle the blaze. In Melbourne, temperatures are forecast to reach 30C on Christmas Day and 40C on Boxing Day. It will be hotter in regional areas of the state, with Stawell and Ararat expected to reach 35C on Christmas Day and 40C on Boxing Day, and Horsham tipping past 42C on Thursday. Christmas Day in Sydney will be sunny with a maximum temperature of 26C and 28C on Boxing Day. Conditions will be hotter in the southern regions of the state, with temperatures in Balranald reaching 37C on Christmas Day and 44C on Boxing Day. It will be cooler in Perth on Christmas Day and Boxing Day, reaching a top of 25C in the capital city. Conditions will be hotter in eastern WA, with a forecast of 28C in Moora on Christmas Day and 29C on Boxing Day. Originally published as ‘Catastrophic’: Travel warnings for Boxing Day amid bushfire risk More related stories Environment Bushfires to rage ‘well into January’ Bushfire conditions are expected to worsen in the coming days as temperatures soar across Victoria, after residents evacuate high danger areas. Read more Cricket Horror forecast for Boxing Day Test Cricket fans have been warned of a potentially record breaking forecast on the annual Boxing Day Test. Read more[WT논평] Containment policy aginst China (1)
UnitedHealthcare CEO kept a low public profile. Then he was shot to death in New York
The head into their Week 12 matchup against the Washington Commanders, hoping to reverse a challenging season marked by injuries and mounting criticism. As they prepare to face a familiar foe in this NFC East showdown, the conversation off the field has shifted to linebacker Micah Parsons’ thoughts on a hot topic in sports media. Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Thanks for the feedback.Why This Tech Giant’s Stock is Set to Soar
Some 43 per cent said they expect US equities to be the best-performing asset class in 2024, compared with 27 per cent of respondents pre-election. SINGAPORE - More Asian business owners and large family offices are increasing their allocations to US equities and real estate, fuelled by optimism over US President-elect Donald Trump’s pro-business policies. As a result, they are seeking help to structure their US investments and address any tax compliance issues ahead of Trump’s inauguration, scheduled on Jan 20, 2025. While the S&P 500 US stock market index has been tempered in recent days by inflation concerns, it remains near record highs and is up more than 20 per cent this year. According to the latest Global Fund Manager Survey from Bank of America, respondents were more optimistic after the US election, which took place on Nov 5. Allocations to US equities surged post-election to the highest level since August 2013, with investors holding 29 per cent of the asset class, compared with 10 per cent in October. Some 43 per cent said they expect US equities to be the best-performing asset class in 2024, compared with 27 per cent of respondents pre-election. “A number of our clients are allocating more of their assets to US real estate and equities because one of the core fundamental tenets of what Trump wants to do is reduce the corporate red tape as well as corporate tax rate from 21 per cent to 15 per cent,” said Mr Kurt Rademacher, partner and head of US private client at international law firm Charles Russell Speechlys. “That’s going to help corporate earnings after tax, which could drive up stock prices. If businesses are doing better, there’s more money in people’s pockets. That would potentially also increase the real estate market as a rising tide lifts all boats.” Within the first eight trading days since the US election results, the market value of US equities increased by US$2 trillion (S$2.7 trillion), or 3 per cent. The US dollar gained 3 per cent against an index of the most liquid currencies. Mr Rademacher, who splits his time between Singapore and the US, said regional clients are seeking help to structure their US investments and address any US tax compliance issues. The seasoned professional in international wealth transfer planning told The Straits Times that in Asia, many of the ultra high-net-worth (UHNW) families from China, Indonesia, Taiwan and the Philippines have some US connections. Most of them have children studying there, are working on Wall Street or are married to an American. “We step in and try to manage the tax situation for them. For those few clients in the region who don’t have US family members, they all have US equity exposure or US real estate exposure, and they too need advice,” Mr Rademacher said. A lawyer with another law firm also shared that he has been kept busy handling inquiries from wealthy clients who want to invest in the US, leveraging Singapore family offices as an investment vehicle to do so. Charles Russell Speechlys’ head of private office Marcus Yorke-Long said Trump’s victory provides direction, which in turn underpins investor confidence as there is now an element of predictability that can be applied to global markets and geopolitics. “Mr Trump has a very strong voice, and he now also has a very strong mandate. Investors and families tend to find it somewhat easier to plot their path when there are elements of conviction and direction as opposed to uncertainty and mixed messages,” said Mr Yorke-Long, whose team handles relationships with global families seeking broad conversations across sectors, territories and generations. Political change provides an opportunity for UHNWs to review their global structures and tax mitigation strategies, Mr Yorke-Long said. Mr Rademacher said individuals who have not filed their US income tax returns should do so promptly, as the Internal Revenue Service is ramping up efforts to pursue non-filers. He added that Singaporeans who have China-centred manufacturing business can expect a period of uncertainty and chaos. This is because Trump has announced his intention to impose a blanket tariff ranging from 10 per cent to 20 per cent on all imports, along with additional tariffs of at least 60 per cent on products imported from China. Goldman Sachs expects the US to impose additional tariffs averaging 20 per cent on Chinese products in the first half of 2025. “There are lots of questions about whether Trump really wants a 60 per cent import duty, or whether what he really wants is a free trade agreement with China, or freer trade agreement with China. “But there will be a period of time when that’s going to be difficult for Singaporean clients with Chinese businesses in the manufacturing sector,” said Mr Rademacher. Even allies of the US may be affected by Trump’s tariff-fuelled war as global trade remains strongly intertwined with the US and Chinese economies. Allianz Trade, an insurance group, said rising US-China tensions are reshaping global supply chains and paving the way for new trade powerhouses. It identified 25 economies that could benefit from this new world order. “Beyond fast-growing economies such as India, this shift has opened doors for nations like Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia, and the United Arab Emirates to step up as next-generation trade hubs,” Ms Francoise Huang, senior economist for the Asia-Pacific and trade at Allianz Trade said. For everyone else with US connections, they should be better off from a pure tax policy perspective, Mr Rademacher said. Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads. Read 3 articles and stand to win rewards Spin the wheel now
NoneThere’ll be no complimentary champagne, red carpets or luxury suites as the Ducks welcome visitors from Las Vegas on Wednesday, when they’ll joust with the Golden Knights in search of their first victory in the season series. Vegas captured two prior meetings by 3-1 and 3-2 counts in 2024-25, after their title defense last season was weighed down by losses in three of four matchups with the fledgling Ducks. Frank Vatrano had four goals and six points in those games to pace the Ducks. After pounding the bottom of the ketchup bottle – he has 16 more shots on goal than any other Duck – the sauce is starting to flow for Vatrano, with four goals in his past four games following just one goal against a goalie in his other 18 outings. Last year, when he catapulted over his previous career high of 24 goals to find the twine 37 times, Vatrano wedged a goal between droughts of nine and seven contests before finishing the campaign with seven goals in four games. “Frankie was going to score eventually. He’s a scorer, and those guys go through dry spells,” Ducks coach Greg Cronin said. “It doesn’t matter how many games you don’t score in.” All four of Vatrano’s goals featured assists by Troy Terry, who has seven helpers over that same four-game span. Terry has created a more commanding presence and assumed an even stronger leadership role this season, one in which the 27-year-old said the Ducks’ young group sometimes made him feel old. Yet Vatrano said he saw “the same player.” “As you get older, you know where you’re going to score your goals from and where you’re going to get your opportunities,” Vatrano, 30, said. “You kind of outsmart guys, knowing where you need to be, knowing where you need to break down the defense and hold onto the puck to make plays. I think it’s just him maturing, playing a lot more games and becoming a veteran in this league.” Yet Terry underwent something of a stylistic transformation offensively last season, which paid dividends as it progressed. He has continued to refine his game, balancing his ability to carry the puck confidently with trust that he’ll be able to recover dumps, chips and other conservative plays that can enable him to continue attacking. Cronin, who described the line of Vatrano, Terry and Ryan Strome as a trio that played like “a fourth line with skill,” credited the relationship Terry has with assistant coach Tim Army for some of his advances. “He’s getting a steady diet and a healthy diet of when to move (the puck) forward and when not to move it forward, to recognize when there’s an opportunity to use your creativity at the offensive blue line and when not to,” Cronin said. The scoring spree of Vatrano and Terry has been timely since Leo Carlsson sustained an upper-body injury four games ago against Seattle. He should be considered doubtful against Vegas. Defenseman Cam Fowler, who had five points against Vegas last season, is again a possibility to skate but hasn’t played since Nov. 5. Related Articles Vegas will be without a pair of rearguards, Zach Whitecloud and former Duck Ben Hutton, as well as Mark Stone, the Golden Knights’ captain and top scorer on a per-game basis. They’re led in overall points by Jack Eichel and in defensive scoring by former Duck Shea Theodore. Like the Ottawa Senators were in the Ducks’ 4-3 shootout win on Sunday, Vegas will be in the back half of games on consecutive nights after hosting the Edmonton Oilers on Tuesday. When: 7 p.m. Where: Honda Center How to watch: Victory+, KCOP (Ch. 13)