kijiji leamington
Suspect named after three police officers punched and spat at in takeaway attack
'Remarkable' Olivia Hussey who has died aged 73 faced rape, beatings, infidelity and cancer after shooting to fame at just 15 as Zeffirelli's JulietLiveWire Group (NYSE:LVWR) Stock Price Down 5.5% – Here’s Why
In today's world of escalating cyber threats, artificial intelligence is emerging as a transformative force in protecting digital assets. Poli Reddy Reddem , a cybersecurity expert currently working in the medical technology sector, explores groundbreaking developments in AI-powered security solutions . The Rising Cost of Digital Defense Data breach costs have reached alarming levels, hitting $4.45 million in 2024, representing a 15% increase over three years. This surge in financial impact has pushed organizations to seek advanced security measures. AI-powered security systems have emerged as a cost-effective solution, delivering impressive results in breach prevention and mitigation. Organizations implementing these intelligent systems report a dramatic 74.5% reduction in breach-related costs compared to those using traditional security methods. This significant cost difference stems from AI's ability to detect threats earlier, respond faster, and prevent more sophisticated attacks that often lead to costly data breaches. The technology's effectiveness in reducing financial impact while improving security posture has made it an essential investment for organizations aiming to protect their digital assets. Smart Systems Lead the Way The technology's ability to detect and respond to threats has become so crucial that 69% of organizations now acknowledge they cannot effectively address critical cybersecurity threats without AI support. These intelligent systems are revolutionizing traditional security approaches with unprecedented accuracy and speed. Advancing Threat Detection AI algorithms have revolutionized threat detection through advanced pattern recognition and real-time monitoring capabilities. These intelligent systems track network behavior, user activities, and resource usage to identify potential security risks. The technology demonstrates remarkable accuracy, successfully identifying 99.9% of known threats and achieving a 98.7% detection rate for new, previously unseen threats. This level of precision marks a significant advancement in cybersecurity defense mechanisms. The Power of Behavioral Analysis AI's capabilities extend to analyzing user behavior patterns, offering deep insights into potential security threats. By examining login attempts, file access behaviors, and communication patterns, these systems can detect insider threats and compromised accounts that might evade traditional security measures, reducing attacker detection time by 53%. Future Prospects The AI cybersecurity market is poised for remarkable growth, projecting an increase from $8.8 billion in 2019 to $38.2 billion by 2026. Predictive threat intelligence powered by AI is expected to reduce threat detection time by up to 12% while increasing prediction accuracy by 60% compared to traditional methods. Overcoming Implementation Hurdles The journey isn't without challenges. Organizations must address concerns about data bias, system transparency, and potential adversarial attacks. The industry also faces a significant skills gap, with only 12% of cybersecurity professionals possessing advanced AI/ML skills. Strategic Development Progress requires a balanced approach focusing on technological advancement while addressing ethical considerations. Organizations are prioritizing transparent and accountable AI systems, with 73% making it a key priority and 66% emphasizing data protection and privacy in their AI initiatives. Building Collaborative Solutions The evolution of AI cybersecurity requires collaborative efforts across multiple sectors. Strong partnerships between industry experts, educational institutions, and government bodies are driving innovation forward. This cooperation has led to expanded specialized training programs and enhanced public-private initiatives, helping bridge the critical skills gap in the field. In conclusion, the integration of AI in cybersecurity represents a pivotal shift in digital defense strategies. While implementing these advanced systems presents challenges, from data bias to skills gaps, their transformative potential cannot be ignored. As Poli Reddy Reddem illustrates, AI's ability to enhance threat detection, automate responses, and adapt to emerging threats makes it indispensable for modern cybersecurity. With continued technological advancement and responsible development practices, AI promises to build more resilient digital defenses for our interconnected future.
DFSK, in partnership with QSJ Motors Philippines Inc., has entered the local automotive scene and unveiled its bold vision for the future of mobility. During the event, the Chinese automaker also showcased its battery electric and plug-in hybrid model lineup, marking the brand’s official entry into the Philippine market. DFSK is a wholly-owned subsidiary of SERES Group. Established in 2003, the company has grown into a global powerhouse with over 3 million users worldwide. The company claims its commitment to innovation and quality has undeniably brought them success, with over 400,000 sales recorded in 2017 alone. DFSK commercial and passenger vehicles have been exported to more than 70 countries and regions, including Europe, South America, Africa, the Middle East, and Southeast Asia. In 2018, QSJ Motors Phils Inc. started its partnership with DFSK, trading its light trucks, commercial trucks, and multi-purpose vehicles in the Philippines. Kenneth Jiang, Business Manager of QSJ Motors Philippines Inc., highlighted the strategic partnership between QSJ and DFSK and shared, “Our partnership with DFSK is not just about bringing a new brand of vehicles into the Philippine market, but about redefining the way Filipinos view mobility. Together, we aim to introduce innovative, sustainable, and accessible transportation options that will meet the growing demand for eco-friendly vehicles without compromising on quality, safety, or performance.” DFSK introduced three models representing the brand’s commitment to sustainable mobility in the country. The all-electric model Candy Mini EV grabbed the most attention during the event as a compact, fun, and eco-friendly electric vehicle, perfect for urban driving. Next was the E5 PHEV mid-size and seven-seater SUV, highlighting its plug-in hybrid technology. The EC75 all-electric Commercial Van setup for logistics and delivery businesses completes the lineup. Themed “Redefining Rides,” the partnership between DFSK and QSJ Motors Philippines Inc., has set the stage for a new era of mobility in the Philippines, focusing on intelligent, sustainable, and accessible transportation. E5 PHEV The lone PHEV in the lineup, the seven-seater E5, offers an impressive pure electric range of up to 100km. With a gasoline engine as a range extender, its combined range is up to 1,150km on paper. The vehicle also has advanced regenerative braking, comprehensive safety features, and a spacious interior. Available in two variants, the price starts at P1.580 million. Key Features: Range 100 km pure electric range, 1,150 km combined range Battery Capacity 17.52 kWh Charging Time 4 hours Powertrain 1.5L engine paired with a permanent magnetic synchronous motor (81 + 130 kW peak power) Torque Maximum of 135,300 Nm Luxurious interior with seat ventilation/heating, panoramic sunroof, 12.3-inch dual-screen infotainment system with a 12-speaker surround sound system Six airbags, Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS), including hill start assist, traction control, and hill descent control Candy Mini EV DFSK positions the Candy Mini EV as the perfect solution for city dwellers seeking a stylish and practical electric vehicle. This compact Mini EV is easy to maneuver through tight spaces and boasts an eye-catching design. The Candy Mini EV offers zero emission and a cost-effective alternative to traditional vehicles. Ideal for short trips and daily errands, this mini EV is priced at P658,000. Key Features: Pure Electric Range 220 km Battery Capacity 16.8 kWh Power 30 kW peak power Charging Time 4.5 hours Seating Capacity Four-seater with comfortable fabric seats Safety Equipped with airbags, Isofix, ABS, EBD, and electric power steering Smart Technology Advanced infotainment systems, cruise control system, parking radar, and HD reverse camera EC75 All-electric Delivery Van For businesses looking to reduce their carbon footprint, the EC75 Commercial Van is a game changer. Designed for efficiency and utility, this two-seater fully-electric van provides ample seven cubic meter cargo space and advanced technology to streamline operations. Focusing on durability and performance, the EC75 has innovative features for any business. This model is priced at P1.450 million. Key Features: Cargo Capacity Seven cubic meters Electric Range 310 km Battery Capacity 50.38 kWh Charging Time 45 minutes (fast charging) Power 70 kW motor and 230 N-m of torque Build Durable monocoque body designed for heavy-duty use Safety Two airbags and advanced braking systems Smart Features Wireless charging, real-time tracking and fleet management systems Commitment to Sustainability DFSK, in partnership with QSJ Motors Philippines, Inc., is committed to leading the charge towards a greener future. By expanding their electric vehicle lineup, they are meeting the growing demand for sustainable transportation and contributing to global efforts to combat climate change. Their new energy vehicles are designed with the environment in mind, ensuring every drive is a step toward a cleaner planet. Image credits: Randy S. Peregrino , DFSK Randy is our contributing writer for motoring and journey sections. His passion for cars goes beyond appreciation and knowledge as he takes pleasure in fixing stuff all by himself - as long as he has the right tools.
The emergence of tools that allow people to efficiently produce novel and detailed online reviews with almost no work has put , service providers and consumers in uncharted territory, watchdog groups and researchers say. Related Articles have long plagued many popular consumer websites, and Yelp. They are typically traded on private social media groups between fake review brokers and businesses willing to pay. Sometimes, such reviews are initiated by businesses that offer customers incentives such as gift cards for positive feedback. But AI-infused text generation tools, popularized by OpenAI’s , enable fraudsters to produce reviews faster and in greater volume, according to tech industry experts. The deceptive practice, which is , is carried out year-round but becomes a bigger problem for consumers during the , when many people rely on reviews to help them purchase gifts. Fake reviews are found across a wide range of industries, from e-commerce, lodging and restaurants, to services such as home repairs, and piano lessons. The Transparency Company, a tech company and watchdog group that uses software to detect fake reviews, said it started to see AI-generated reviews show up in large numbers in mid-2023 and they have multiplied ever since. For a report released this month, The Transparency Company analyzed 73 million reviews in three sectors: home, legal and medical services. Nearly 14% of the reviews were likely fake, and the company expressed a “high degree of confidence” that 2.3 million reviews were partly or entirely AI-generated. “It’s just a really, really good tool for these review scammers,” said Maury Blackman, an investor and advisor to tech startups, who reviewed The Transparency Company’s work and is set to lead the organization starting Jan. 1. In August, software company DoubleVerify said it was observing a “significant increase” in mobile phone and smart TV apps with reviews crafted by generative AI. The reviews often were used to deceive customers into installing apps that could hijack devices or run ads constantly, the company said. The following month, the Federal Trade Commission sued the company behind an AI writing tool and content generator called Rytr, accusing it of offering a service that could pollute the marketplace with fraudulent reviews. The FTC, which this year banned the of fake reviews, said some of Rytr’s subscribers used the tool to produce hundreds and perhaps thousands of reviews for garage door repair companies, sellers of “replica” designer handbags and other businesses. Max Spero, CEO of AI detection company Pangram Labs, said the software his company uses has detected with almost certainty that some AI-generated appraisals posted on Amazon bubbled up to the top of review search results because they were so detailed and appeared to be well thought-out. But determining what is fake or not can be challenging. External parties can fall short because they don’t have “access to data signals that indicate patterns of abuse,” Amazon has said. Pangram Labs has done detection for some prominent online sites, which Spero declined to name due to non-disclosure agreements. He said he evaluated Amazon and Yelp independently. Many of the AI-generated comments on Yelp appeared to be posted by individuals who were trying to publish enough reviews to earn an “Elite” badge, which is intended to let users know they should trust the content, Spero said. The badge provides access to exclusive events with local business owners. Fraudsters also want it so their Yelp profiles can look more realistic, said Kay Dean, a former federal criminal investigator who runs a watchdog group called Fake Review Watch. To be sure, just because a review is AI-generated doesn’t necessarily mean its fake. Some consumers might experiment with AI tools to generate content that reflects their genuine sentiments. Some non-native English speakers say they turn to AI to make sure they use accurate language in the reviews they write. “It can help with reviews (and) make it more informative if it comes out of good intentions,” said Michigan State University marketing professor Sherry He, who has researched fake reviews. She says tech platforms should focus on the behavioral patters of bad actors, which prominent platforms already do, instead of discouraging legitimate users from turning to AI tools. Prominent companies are developing policies for how AI-generated content fits into their systems for removing phony or abusive reviews. Some already employ algorithms and investigative teams to detect and take down fake reviews but are giving users some flexibility to use AI. Spokespeople for Amazon and Trustpilot, for example, said they would allow customers to post AI-assisted reviews as long as they reflect their genuine experience. Yelp has taken a more cautious approach, saying its guidelines require reviewers to write their own copy. “With the recent rise in consumer adoption of AI tools, Yelp has significantly invested in methods to better detect and mitigate such content on our platform,” the company said in a statement. The Coalition for Trusted Reviews, which Amazon, Trustpilot, employment review site Glassdoor, and travel sites Tripadvisor, Expedia and launched last year, said that even though deceivers may put AI to illicit use, the technology also presents “an opportunity to push back against those who seek to use reviews to mislead others.” “By sharing best practice and raising standards, including developing advanced AI detection systems, we can protect consumers and maintain the integrity of online reviews,” the group said. banning fake reviews, which took effect in October, allows the agency to fine businesses and individuals who engage in the practice. Tech companies hosting such reviews are shielded from the penalty because they are not legally liable under U.S. law for the content that outsiders post on their platforms. Tech companies, including Amazon, Yelp and Google, have sued fake review brokers they accuse of peddling counterfeit reviews on their sites. The companies say their technology has blocked or removed a huge swath of suspect reviews and suspicious accounts. However, some experts say they could be doing more. “Their efforts thus far are not nearly enough,” said Dean of Fake Review Watch. “If these tech companies are so committed to eliminating review fraud on their platforms, why is it that I, one individual who works with no automation, can find hundreds or even thousands of fake reviews on any given day?” Consumers can try to by watching out for a few , according to researchers. Overly enthusiastic or negative reviews are red flags. Jargon that repeats a product’s full name or model number is another potential giveaway. When it comes to AI, research conducted by Balázs Kovács, a Yale professor of organization behavior, has shown that people can’t tell the difference between AI-generated and human-written reviews. Some AI detectors may also be fooled by shorter texts, which are common in online reviews, the study said. However, there are some “AI tells” that online shoppers and service seekers should keep it mind. Panagram Labs says reviews written with AI are typically longer, highly structured and include “empty descriptors,” such as generic phrases and attributes. The writing also tends to include cliches like “the first thing that struck me” and “game-changer.”
THREE KEY FACTS: For over a century, NZ had privileged access to the markets, resources and technologies of the British Empire. The Four Firsts with China gave NZ initially unique access to the world’s greatest rising economic power. While GDP per capita has often fallen during this century a wave of new immigrants has arrived. “Matthew,” sighed Speaker Gerry Brownlee in a pre-Christmas podcast, “you really do have to give up this dreadfully negative approach to everything in life.” For anyone connected with politics, it pays to listen to the Speaker. After all, the Speaker can theoretically still have you locked up for contempt.
Source: Running back-returner Javon Leake staying put with Edmonton Elks
Attorneys representing President-elect Donald Trump have asked the Supreme Court to pause a law that would force TikTok-owner ByteDance to sell the short-form video app or see it banned from the United States. If the app isn’t sold, the ban is set to take effect in just a few weeks, on January 19. ByteDance is challenging the constitutionality of the law — officially titled the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act — with the Supreme Court scheduled to hear arguments on January 10 . In a new filing , Trump’s lawyers describe the ban-or-sell deadline, coming one day before his inauguration, as “unfortunate timing” that interferes with his “ability to manage the United States’ foreign policy.” The filing does not specify what approach Trump might take to the issue, but it claims that he “alone possesses the consummate dealmaking expertise, the electoral mandate, and the political will to negotiate a resolution to save the platform while addressing the national security concerns expressed by the Government.” The filing also notes that he currently has 14.7 million followers on TikTok, “allowing him to evaluate TikTok’s importance as a unique medium for freedom of expression, including core political speech.” The law’s supporters have claimed TikTok presents a national security threat because the Chinese government could use it to collect data and push propaganda to US viewers. While Trump attempted to ban TikTok during his first term as president, he has expressed support for the app more recently. During his presidential campaign, he posted on Truth Social, “FOR ALL OF THOSE THAT WANT TO SAVE TIK TOK IN AMERICA, VOTE TRUMP!” Several civil liberties and free speech groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union and Electronic Frontier, have filed their own brief supporting TikTok’s appeal and arguing that “the government has not presented credible evidence of ongoing or imminent harm caused by TikTok.”
There was no guarantee that report on former Rep. would ever see the light of day, especially once the Florida GOP lawmaker abruptly quit his job last month in Congress. But the public on Monday did get to of allegations that played a role in disqualifying Gaetz from to serve as President-elect Donald Trump's attorney general. In , the committee – which is equally divided between Republicans and Democrats – made Gaetz one of only a few former members whose Ethics Committee investigation was made public after they had resigned from office. The committee said it unearthed "substantial evidence" that Gaetz engaged in "prostitution, statutory rape, illicit drug use" and obstruction of Congress, including paying for sex with a 17-year-old, though he did not know or ask her age at the time. While Gaetz has been of sexual misconduct in the past, the House Ethics Committee investigation into his conduct was thrown into the spotlight when Trump nominated him to be attorney general in the incoming administration. Senators demanded more information about the allegations against Gaetz as they prepared to consider his nomination, with some Republican senators demanding access to the report as some details leaked to the press. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said he would "strongly request" the committee . The panel met to consider whether to release the report and in November. Gaetz shortly afterward. In a second vote earlier this month, quietly joined their Democratic colleagues in supporting its release. "The Committee has typically not released its findings after losing jurisdiction in a matter," the report read. "However, there are a few prior instances where the Committee has determined that it was in the public interest to release its findings even after a Member’s resignation from Congress. The Committee does not do so lightly." Here's what to know about the committee's decision to release the report. It is extremely rare that the House Ethics Committee would release a report on a former member of Congress – so much so that has long been considered a way for members plagued by ethics questions to avoid public release of their alleged wrongdoing. "It's an inducement for members to exit that the reports are not released," said Norm Eisen, former co-counsel to the Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee during then-President Trump's first impeachment. "So it encourages a natural sanction of the offender no longer being in a position of public service." In only a handful of cases, the committee has determined that the information is in the public interest despite the lawmaker no longer serving in Congress. For example, the committee released a report in 1987 a few months after former Rep. Bill Boner, D-Tenn., resigned from Congress to become the . The report indicated Boner had taken bribes and misused campaign funds. In another case, the committee continued to investigate sexual harassment allegations against former , D-N.Y., who resigned in 2020, to determine whether other members covered up his conduct. Rep. Glenn Ivey, D-Md., is a member of the committee who voted for the Gaetz report's release. He told USA TODAY it was important to release the document because "the public had the right to know this sort of thing." In cases where there was a "relatively minor incident" the committee will choose not to release the report, Ivey said, adding: "This was anything but that." It was also important to signal to other House members what is expected of them as a member of Congress, Ivey said. "Our job as the watchmen for the Congress is to let our colleagues know when there's conduct that crosses the line," he said. "So that it gives them guidance as to how they should conduct themselves going forward." Others argued the panel was : Much of the information in the report had already leaked, leaving the public to speculate without the full picture. Gaetz and Trump "put these issues in the public eye" by putting him up for attorney general, Eisen said. "They open Pandora's Box, some of the details came out, so at that point it's hard to close Pandora's Box back up." Ethics Committee Chair Rep. Michael Guest, R-Miss., penned an addendum to the report explaining why several committee members voted against releasing the document. Guest and his other like-minded GOP members "do not challenge the committee's findings," he wrote, but "we take great exception" to the decision to deviate from "well-established standards" and release a report on someone who no longer serves in the House. Doing so is "extremely rare," Guest argued, and may be perceived as an attempt to "weaponize" the committee's investigation process. Releasing the report, he added, was "a dangerous departure with potentially catastrophic consequences." Gaetz has and attacked the credibility of the Ethics Committee. On Monday, he published a series of posts on X with snippets of witness testimony that he argued refute the committee's findings. “Giving funds to someone you are dating - that they didn’t ask for - and that isn’t ‘charged’ for sex is now prostitution?!?” . “There is a reason they did this to me in a Christmas Eve-Eve report and not in a courtroom of any kind where I could present evidence and challenge witnesses.” The former Florida GOP lawmaker made in federal court Monday to block the committee's release of the findings, claiming the committee was outside of its jurisdiction. But while Gaetz sought a temporary restraining order Monday morning to prevent the report being released, the judge in the case asked Gaetz an hour later to explain why the case was still relevant once the materials were public. Monday evening, Gaetz's attorneys acknowledging that he "has no suffered irreversible and irreparable harm" and agrees with the judge that immediate action is no longer relevant.
Hudson Joseph Meek, a 16-year-old actor known for his role as Young Baby in the 2017 film "Baby Driver," tragically passed away following an accident in Vestavia Hills, Alabama. Meek fell “to the roadway from a motor vehicle in motion” in Vestavia Hills, Ala., on the night of Dec. 19, the Jefferson County coroner’s office said Thursday in a statement to The Times. Meek sustained blunt force injuries and was admitted to the University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital, where he died from his injuries two days later. Thousands of people took to social media to express their condolences to the actor's family. His death raised many questions as to how did he fall from a moving vehicle or whether someone pushed him or he was under drug influence. The Vestavia Hills Police Department is investigating the circumstances surrounding the death, the coroner’s office said. “Our hearts are broken to share that Hudson Meek went home to be with Jesus tonight,” Meek’s family wrote Saturday in a statement on his Instagram page. “His 16 years on this earth were far too short, but he accomplished so much and significantly impacted everyone he met.”New-look Astros admit talks with Bregman stalledPrimerica (NYSE:PRI) Trading Down 0% – Here’s Why