首页 > 

50.jili

2025-01-23
50.jili
50.jili

BEIRUT (AP) — Insurgents' stunning march across Syria gained speed on Saturday with news that they had reached the suburbs of the capital and with the government forced to deny rumors that President Bashar Assad had fled the country. The rebels' moves around Damascus, reported by an opposition war monitor and a rebel commander, came after the Syrian army withdrew from much of southern part of the country, leaving more areas, including two provincial capitals, under the control of opposition fighters. The advances in the past week were among the largest in recent years by opposition factions, led by a group that has its origins in al-Qaida and is considered a terrorist organization by the U.S. and the United Nations. As they have advanced, the insurgents, led by the Hayat Tahrir al-Sham group, or HTS, have met little resistance from the Syrian army. The U.N.’s special envoy for Syria, Geir Pedersen, on Saturday called for urgent talks in Geneva to ensure an “orderly political transition.” Speaking to reporters at the annual Doha Forum in Qatar, he said the situation in Syria was changing by the minute. In Damascus, people rushed to stock up on supplies. Thousands rushed the Syria border with Lebanon, trying to leave the country. Many shops in the capital were shuttered, a resident told The Associated Press, and those that remained open ran out of staples such as sugar. Some shops were selling items at three times the normal price. “The situation is very strange. We are not used to that,” the resident said, insisting on anonymity, fearing retributions. “People are worried whether there will be a battle (in Damascus) or not.” It was the first time that opposition forces reach the outskirts of Damascus since 2018, when Syrian troops recaptured the area following a yearslong siege. Assad's status Amid the developments, Syria’s state media denied rumors flooding social media that Assad has left the country, saying he is performing his duties in Damascus. Assad's chief international backer, Russia, is busy with its war in Ukraine, and Lebanon’s powerful Hezbollah, which at one point sent thousands of fighters to shore up his forces, has been weakened by a yearlong conflict with Israel. Iran, meanwhile, has seen its proxies across the region degraded by regular Israeli airstrikes. Pedersen said a date for the talks in Geneva on the implementation of U.N. Resolution 2254 would be announced later. The resolution, adopted in 2015, called for a Syrian-led political process, starting with the establishment of a transitional governing body, followed by the drafting of a new constitution and ending with U.N.-supervised elections. The insurgents' march Rami Abdurrahman, who heads the Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, an opposition war monitor, said insurgents were in the Damascus suburbs of Maadamiyah, Jaramana and Daraya. Opposition fighters were also marching from eastern Syria toward the Damascus suburb of Harasta, he added. A commander with the insurgents, Hassan Abdul-Ghani, posted on the Telegram messaging app that opposition forces had begun the “final stage” of their offensive by encircling Damascus. Syria’s military, meanwhile, sent large numbers of reinforcements to defend the key central city of Homs, Syria’s third largest, as insurgents approached its outskirts. The shock offensive began Nov. 27, during which gunmen captured the northern city of Aleppo, Syria’s largest, and the central city of Hama, the country’s fourth largest city. HTS leader Abu Mohammed al-Golani told CNN in an interview Thursday from Syria that the aim is to overthrow Assad’s government. The Britain-based Observatory said Syrian troops have withdrawn from much of the two southern provinces and are sending reinforcements to Homs, where a battle is looming. If the insurgents capture Homs, they would cut the link between Damascus, Assad’s seat of power, and the coastal region where the president enjoys wide support. The Syrian army said in a statement Saturday that it has carried out redeployment and repositioning in Sweida and Daraa after its checkpoints came under attack by “terrorists.” The army said it is setting up a “strong and coherent defensive and security belt in the area,” apparently to defend Damascus from the south. The Syrian government has referred to opposition gunmen as terrorists since conflict broke out in March 2011. After the fall of the cities of Daraa and Sweida early Saturday, Syrian government forces remained in control of five provincial capitals — Damascus, Homs and Quneitra, as well as Latakia and Tartus on the Mediterranean coast. Tartus is home to the only Russian naval base outside the former Soviet Union while Latakia is home to a major Russian air base. Diplomacy in Doha In the gas-rich nation of Qatar, the foreign ministers of Iran, Russia and Turkey met to discuss the situation in Syria. Turkey is a main backer of the rebels. Qatar's top diplomat, Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani, criticized Assad for failing to take advantage of the lull in fighting in recent years to address the country’s underlying problems. “Assad didn’t seize this opportunity to start engaging and restoring his relationship with his people,” he said. Sheikh Mohammed said he was surprised by how quickly the rebels have advanced and said there is a real threat to Syria’s “territorial integrity.” He said the war could “damage and destroy what is left if there is no sense of urgency” to start a political process. After the fall of the cities of Daraa and Sweida early Saturday, Syrian government forces remained in control of five provincial capitals — Damascus, Homs and Quneitra, as well as Latakia and Tartus on the Mediterranean coast. On Friday, U.S.-backed fighters of the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces captured wide parts of the eastern province of Deir el-Zour that borders Iraq as well as the provincial capital that carries the same name. The capture of areas in Deir el-Zour is a blow to Iran’s influence in the region as the area is the gateway to the corridor linking the Mediterranean to Iran, a supply line for Iran-backed fighters, including Lebanon’s Hezbollah. With the capture of a main border crossing with Iraq by the SDF and after opposition fighters took control of the Naseeb border crossing to Jordan in southern Syria, the Syrian government's only gateway to the outside world is the Masnaa border crossing with Lebanon. ____ Karam reported from London. Associated Press writers Albert Aji in Damascus, Syria and Qassim Abdul-Zahra in Baghdad contributed to this report. Bassem Mroue And Zeina Karam, The Associated Press

EU stocks close higher on thin volumes ahead of ChristmasMum of Coleen Rooney says 'I've finally got my daughter back' in heartfelt I'm A Celebrity momentEnzo Maresca has lifted the lid on Leicester’s promotion celebrations and revealed Jamie Vardy and co still know how to party. Maresca led the Foxes to the Sky Bet Championship title last season before joining Chelsea over the summer. Leicester famously toasted their improbable Premier League success in 2016 with an impromptu bash at Vardy’s house. But the venue for last April’s party was not at the striker’s abode, but at Maresca’s house when the players turned up unannounced at 2am. Maresca recalled: “The best present I had from last season was when we got promoted and they arrived at my home. All the team. “This showed the connection between the players; they could go for a party at a different place but they all arrived at my home. It was a fantastic connection and I will always be thankful for them. “I was at home celebrating with my staff and my family and about two o’clock in the morning all the squad was there. We celebrated all together. Last night at Enzo’s 🏡 💙 pic.twitter.com/dqP8BFsDn3 — Leicester City (@LCFC) April 27, 2024 “When I was a player and I won things I never thought to go to the manager’s home. That shows the connection.” Similarly to when they clinched the Premier League crown, Leicester were not actually playing when they found out they were promoted after Leeds lost at QPR. “To be honest I was at home watching the game and when it finished all the staff came over – and later the players,” added the Italian. “They didn’t knock on the door, they were in the garden and knocked on the window. What time did they leave? I don’t remember.” Vardy might not be having a party at the end of this season but he is still banging in the goals at 37 and Maresca rates the striker even more highly than England’s two top goalscorers – Harry Kane and Wayne Rooney. “People don’t realise how good he is,” added Maresca. “I know England have been quite lucky because of Kane and Rooney, this type of striker, they are fantastic. “But Jamie is, if you ask me, the best one.” Maresca returns to the King Power Stadium for the first time with Chelsea on Saturday, but he will be without captain Reece James due to a hamstring problem.

Faisal Mohamed Saleh* The idea of a government-in-exile has resurfaced in discussions among Sudanese civil society groups and opponents of the Port Sudan government. This concept, championed by those who oppose the current military rule, proposes the formation of an exiled government that would delegitimize the authority of General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and represent all groups rejecting the ongoing war and advocating for a return to a democratic path. Proponents of this idea argue that al-Burhan’s government lacks control over significant portions of Sudan, and this reality presents an opportunity for the opposition to provide services and care to citizens outside the government’s reach. While not entirely new, this concept is relatively unprecedented in Sudan’s history of political conflict. Historically, Sudanese opposition movements against military and dictatorial regimes have successfully formed alliances to lead resistance efforts. This was evident in the Graduates’ Congress, the Front of Entities that toppled Ibrahim Abboud’s regime in 1964, the National Alliance for National Salvation that ousted Nimeiri in 1985, and the National Democratic Alliance formed in the early 1990s to oppose al-Bashir’s rule. Despite the presence of armed factions and territories under opposition control during al-Bashir’s era, the notion of a government-in-exile was never raised. Why, then, is it being proposed now? Proponents of this idea have failed to provide compelling justifications. Furthermore, an examination of the potential outcomes reveals a risky venture that could lead to disastrous consequences. The most dangerous of these is the formal declaration of the country’s division, a calamity that wise minds are striving to avoid. Experiences in neighbouring countries like Libya, Syria, and Yemen demonstrate that governments in exile have not led to positive developments but rather legitimized divisions, hindering dialogue and negotiation from resolving conflicts. While it’s true that Sudan is currently divided between the government in Port Sudan and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), this is a reality imposed by force of arms, and it should not be accepted or legitimized. The RSF has established local civilian administrations in areas under its control, but these lack genuine authority and serve merely as a facade for the RSF’s military power. A government-in-exile would likely suffer the same fate, becoming a mere shadow of the RSF. Should such a government be formed and attempt to exercise influence, it would only find it in RSF-occupied territories. It is unrealistic to expect those who have taken up arms, regardless of their affiliation, to submit to a civilian administration composed of politicians who have not participated in the fighting. More likely, they would exploit these political groups to advance their agendas. Even worse, a civilian political group would be burdened with the responsibility for all the atrocities committed by the RSF in areas under its control. The most crucial question is whether any country or international organization would recognize such a government-in-exile. Currently, there is no indication of international willingness to do so, and there is no reason to repeat failed experiments in the region. It is naive to assume that those who acknowledge the opposition as a significant voice in Sudanese affairs would be prepared to recognize them as a government-in-exile. This is a different matter and would be subject to complex calculations that ultimately would not favour a government-in-exile. * Former information and culture minister during first Hamdock’s transitional cabinet.Tweet Facebook Mail A couple has survived croc-infested territory in 40-degree heat for three days after they were swept away by floodwaters in outback Queensland . The couple, aged in their 50s, and their two dogs were stranded for three days in the remote Gulf of Carpentaria, north-west of Staaten River National Park. They were swept away on December 5 and had no food or water, surviving by drinking from the river. READ MORE: How an iconic TV show unlocked a 60-year-old mystery A couple have survived croc-infested territory in 40 degree heat after being swept away by floodwaters. (Lifeflight) It's believed the 4WD they were travelling in was overcome by a large wave of floodwater at a river crossing. They managed to escape the vehicle and make it to shore. The man then swam back into croc-infested waters to free their two dogs. With no phone or reception, the pair scrawled "SOS" in the dirt, which was later spotted by a LifeFlight helicopter from the air.  READ MORE: Home invasion leaves one man dead, sparks police chase on NSW North Coast  The pair were treated for dehydration and exposure. (LifeFlight) They were airlifted to hospital and treated for dehydration and exposure, alongside their two dogs. DOWNLOAD THE 9NEWS APP : Stay across all the latest in breaking news, sport, politics and the weather via our news app and get notifications sent straight to your smartphone. Available on the Apple App Store and Google Play .

Indiana Pacers vs Charlotte Hornets Prediction 12-8-24 NBA Picks | Sports Chat Place - Sports Chat Place

Faisal Mohamed Saleh* The idea of a government-in-exile has resurfaced in discussions among Sudanese civil society groups and opponents of the Port Sudan government. This concept, championed by those who oppose the current military rule, proposes the formation of an exiled government that would delegitimize the authority of General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and represent all groups rejecting the ongoing war and advocating for a return to a democratic path. Proponents of this idea argue that al-Burhan’s government lacks control over significant portions of Sudan, and this reality presents an opportunity for the opposition to provide services and care to citizens outside the government’s reach. While not entirely new, this concept is relatively unprecedented in Sudan’s history of political conflict. Historically, Sudanese opposition movements against military and dictatorial regimes have successfully formed alliances to lead resistance efforts. This was evident in the Graduates’ Congress, the Front of Entities that toppled Ibrahim Abboud’s regime in 1964, the National Alliance for National Salvation that ousted Nimeiri in 1985, and the National Democratic Alliance formed in the early 1990s to oppose al-Bashir’s rule. Despite the presence of armed factions and territories under opposition control during al-Bashir’s era, the notion of a government-in-exile was never raised. Why, then, is it being proposed now? Proponents of this idea have failed to provide compelling justifications. Furthermore, an examination of the potential outcomes reveals a risky venture that could lead to disastrous consequences. The most dangerous of these is the formal declaration of the country’s division, a calamity that wise minds are striving to avoid. Experiences in neighbouring countries like Libya, Syria, and Yemen demonstrate that governments in exile have not led to positive developments but rather legitimized divisions, hindering dialogue and negotiation from resolving conflicts. While it’s true that Sudan is currently divided between the government in Port Sudan and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), this is a reality imposed by force of arms, and it should not be accepted or legitimized. The RSF has established local civilian administrations in areas under its control, but these lack genuine authority and serve merely as a facade for the RSF’s military power. A government-in-exile would likely suffer the same fate, becoming a mere shadow of the RSF. Should such a government be formed and attempt to exercise influence, it would only find it in RSF-occupied territories. It is unrealistic to expect those who have taken up arms, regardless of their affiliation, to submit to a civilian administration composed of politicians who have not participated in the fighting. More likely, they would exploit these political groups to advance their agendas. Even worse, a civilian political group would be burdened with the responsibility for all the atrocities committed by the RSF in areas under its control. The most crucial question is whether any country or international organization would recognize such a government-in-exile. Currently, there is no indication of international willingness to do so, and there is no reason to repeat failed experiments in the region. It is naive to assume that those who acknowledge the opposition as a significant voice in Sudanese affairs would be prepared to recognize them as a government-in-exile. This is a different matter and would be subject to complex calculations that ultimately would not favour a government-in-exile. * Former information and culture minister during first Hamdock’s transitional cabinet.BEIRUT (AP) — Insurgents' stunning march across Syria accelerated Saturday with news that they had reached the gates of the capital and that government forces had abandoned the central city of Homs. The government was forced to deny rumors that President Bashar Assad had fled the country. The loss of Homs is a potentially crippling blow for Assad. It stands at an important intersection between Damascus and Syria’s coastal provinces of Latakia and Tartus — the Syrian leader’s base of support and home to a Russian strategic naval base. The pro-government Sham FM reported that government forces took positions outside Syria’s third-largest city, without elaborating. Rami Abdurrahman who heads the Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, said Syrian troops and members of different security agencies have withdrawn from the city, adding that rebels have entered parts of it. The capture of Homs is a major victory for insurgents, who have already seized the cities of Aleppo and Hama , as well as large parts of the south, in a lightning offensive that began Nov. 27. Analysts said Homs falling into rebel hands would be a game-changer. The rebels' moves around Damascus, reported by the monitor and a rebel commander, came after the Syrian army withdrew from much of southern part of the country, leaving more areas, including several provincial capitals, under the control of opposition fighters. For the first time in the country’s long-running civil war, the government now has control of only three of 14 provincial capitals: Damascus, Latakia and Tartus. The advances in the past week were among the largest in recent years by opposition factions, led by a group that has its origins in al-Qaida and is considered a terrorist organization by the U.S. and the United Nations. In their push to overthrow Assad's government, the insurgents, led by the Hayat Tahrir al-Sham group, or HTS, have met little resistance from the Syrian army. The rapid rebel gains, coupled with the lack of support from Assad's erstwhile allies, posed the most serious threat to his rule since the start of the war. The U.N.’s special envoy for Syria, Geir Pedersen, on Saturday called for urgent talks in Geneva to ensure an “orderly political transition.” Speaking to reporters at the annual Doha Forum in Qatar, he said the situation in Syria was changing by the minute. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, whose country is Assad's chief international backer, said he feels “sorry for the Syrian people.” In Damascus, people rushed to stock up on supplies. Thousands went to Syria's border with Lebanon, trying to leave the country. Many shops in the capital were shuttered, a resident told The Associated Press, and those still open ran out of staples such as sugar. Some were selling items at three times the normal price. “The situation is very strange. We are not used to that,” the resident said, insisting on anonymity, fearing retributions. “People are worried whether there will be a battle (in Damascus) or not.” It was the first time that opposition forces reached the outskirts of Damascus since 2018, when Syrian troops recaptured the area following a yearslong siege. The U.N. said it was moving noncritical staff outside the country as a precaution. Syria’s state media denied social media rumors that Assad left the country, saying he is performing his duties in Damascus. He has had little, if any, help from his allies. Russia, is busy with its war in Ukraine . Lebanon’s Hezbollah, which at one point sent thousands of fighters to shore up Assad's forces, has been weakened by a yearlong conflict with Israel. Iran has seen its proxies across the region degraded by regular Israeli airstrikes. U.S. President-elect Donald Trump on Saturday posted on social media that that the United States should avoid engaging militarily in Syria. Pedersen said a date for talks in Geneva on the implementation a U.N. resolution, adopted in 2015, and calling for a Syrian-led political process, would be announced later. The resolution calls for the establishment of a transitional governing body, followed by the drafting of a new constitution and ending with U.N.-supervised elections. Later Saturday, foreign ministers and senior diplomats from eight key countries, including Saudi Arabia, Russia, Egypt, Turkey and Iran, along with Pederson, gathered on the sidelines of the Doha Summit to discuss the situation in Syria. In a statement issued late Saturday, the participants affirmed their support for a political solution to the Syrian crisis “that would lead to the end of military activity and protect civilians.” They also agreed on the importance of strengthening international efforts to increase aid to the Syrian people. Rami Abdurrahman, who heads the Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, an opposition war monitor, said insurgents were in the Damascus suburbs of Maadamiyah, Jaramana and Daraya. Opposition fighters were marching toward the Damascus suburb of Harasta, he added. A commander with the insurgents, Hassan Abdul-Ghani, posted on the Telegram messaging app that opposition forces had begun the “final stage” of their offensive by encircling Damascus. HTS controls much of northwest Syria and in 2017 set up a “salvation government” to run day-to-day affairs in the region. In recent years, HTS leader Abu Mohammed al-Golani has sought to remake the group’s image, cutting ties with al-Qaida, ditching hard-line officials and vowing to embrace pluralism and religious tolerance. The shock offensive began Nov. 27, during which gunmen captured the northern city of Aleppo, Syria’s largest, and the central city of Hama , the country’s fourth largest city. Opposition activists said Saturday that a day earlier, insurgents entered Palmyra, which is home to invaluable archaeological sites had been in government hands since being taken from the Islamic State group in 2017. To the south, Syrian troops left much of the province of Quneitra including the main Baath City, activists said. Syrian Observatory said government troops have withdrawn from much of the two southern provinces. The Syrian army said in a statement that it carried out redeployment and repositioning in Sweida and Daraa after its checkpoints came under attack by “terrorists." The army said it was setting up a “strong and coherent defensive and security belt in the area,” apparently to defend Damascus from the south. The Syrian government has referred to opposition gunmen as terrorists since conflict broke out in March 2011. The foreign ministers of Iran, Russia and Turkey, meeting in Qatar, called for an end to the hostilities. Turkey is a main backer of the rebels. Qatar's top diplomat, Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani, criticized Assad for failing to take advantage of the lull in fighting in recent years to address the country’s underlying problems. “Assad didn’t seize this opportunity to start engaging and restoring his relationship with his people,” he said. Sheikh Mohammed said he was surprised by how quickly the rebels have advanced and said there is a real threat to Syria’s “territorial integrity.” He said the war could “damage and destroy what is left if there is no sense of urgency” to start a political process. Karam reported from London. Associated Press writers Albert Aji in Damascus, Syria; Qassim Abdul-Zahra in Baghdad; and Josef Federman and Victoria Eastwood in Doha, Qatar, contributed to this report.Polls close in Ghana's general election in the shadow of the worst economic crisis in a generation

India fighting TB in multi-pronged manner: PM ModiIslamic Revolution principles key to Iran’s global strategy, says FMLabour-backing trade union Unite hit by accusations of bullying and victimisation

ASPI Stock News: Shareholder Rights Law Firm Robbins LLP Urges ASP Isotopes Inc. Stockholders ...

Previous: 50jili
Next: 50jili com login