Thanksgiving Weekend Sports Guide: Your roadmap to NFL matchups, other games, times, odds
The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) has filed a complaint with the Enforcement Directorate (ED) against Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leaders Parvesh Verma and Manjinder Singh Sirsa, accusing them of orchestrating a “vote-buying” operation by allegedly cash to people ahead of Delhi Assembly elections, party leaders said on Thursday. Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Singh submitted the complaint, urging ED to launch an investigation under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) in what he said was a “cash-for-vote scam”. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) refuted the allegations, saying that the AAP was trying to divert people’s attention from their mistakes. Addressing a press conference after submitting the complaint at the ED office, Singh alleged that crores of rupees in unaccounted cash are lying at Verma’s residence and are allegedly being used to bribe voters. The same has been captured on video, he alleged. “A massive vote-buying operation is taking place in Delhi right under the noses of key agencies. In Arvind Kejriwal’s constituency, voters are being bribed with ₹ 1,100. Moreover, crores of rupees could potentially be recovered from the residence of former BJP MP Parvesh Verma if ED were to conduct a raid. This is illicit money being openly distributed to buy votes. Photos and videos of women receiving ₹ 1,100, with a card bearing the Prime Minister’s photo have been captured by journalists,” Singh said. Singh also alleged that Verma and other BJP members “fabricated false and misleading documents to deceive the public in the name of a government scheme”. The cash distribution allegations were first flagged by the AAP a day ago on Wednesday , in which the party said that Verma was “openly distributing cash” to voters in the New Delhi assembly segment from his residence at 20, Windsor Place, Lutyens Delhi. Rebutting the claims, Verma said the act was of providing monetary aid to destitute women registered with NGO Rashtriya Swabhiman Sansthan that was started by his father, former Delhi CM Sahib Singh Verma, 25 years ago. Singh, however, questioned the timing of the aid. “NGO funds are being distributed with the Prime Minister’s photo on them. During Verma’s 10 years as an MP, he never distributed NGO money. Why is it being distributed now ahead of elections? The crores of rupees in illicit funds they have are being used to distribute cash. This is a direct case of money laundering,” Singh alleged. He further criticised investigative agencies, including ED and the Central Bureau of Investigation, and income tax department, for their alleged inaction against the BJP leaders while targeting Opposition parties. Singh added that despite informing beforehand, no officer met the AAP leaders at the ED office. He further said that the AAP will also take the complaint to CBI, IT department and the Election Commission of India. Delhi BJP spokesperson Praveen Shankar Kapoor, meanwhile, said that Singh was “making a fuss over non-issues to divert the focus from the AAP’s “dirty politics”. “The BJP stands by women empowerment and support the needy women and our governments in most states are supporting the women through stipend schemes. Sanjay Singh’s problem is that his party stands exposed for asking women to register at their party level for a non-existent government scheme and so, like his party colleagues, he too is trying to mislead the women of Delhi,” said Kapoor.The National Urban League , a prominent civil rights organization, is speaking out against Walmart's recent move to discontinue its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs. Marc Morial, the group's CEO and president, expressed his disappointment in Walmart , who had previously been a partner of theirs, stating on CBS Mornings that he is "dismayed by this decision." Morial told CBS: "I think what they did is succumb to a smear campaign, to threats, to bullying, and to blackmail by a handful of extremists." Walmart 's drastic reversal of its diversity policies signals a significant shift in U.S. companies as they reassess the legal and political risks tied to ambitious programs to support historically marginalized groups. JonBenét Ramsey's father says advances in DNA technology can help solve daughter's cold case murder Georgia cult mom who thought she breastfed 'evil' into baby stabbed 13-month-old daughter to death The world's largest retailer announced these changes on Monday, following a series of legal wins by conservative groups that have launched a barrage of lawsuits against corporate and federal initiatives designed to uplift minority and women-owned businesses and employees. This retreat from such programs became evident with the election of former President Donald Trump, whose administration is set to prioritize dismantling diversity, equity, and inclusion programs. Trump's incoming deputy chief of policy will be his former adviser Stephen Miller, who heads a group named America First Legal that has actively contested corporate DEI policies. Morial further mentioned that he has reached out to Walmart leaders to discuss the changes in an attempt to comprehend the rationale behind the decision before the National Urban League and other civil rights community members take their own responsive measures. John Furner, the CEO and President of Walmart U.S. said that the company's rollbacks are aimed at ensuring everyone feels they "belong." "Like many companies all across the U.S., we’ve been on a journey," Furner said. "We’ll continue to be on a journey. And what we’re trying to do is to ensure every customer, every associate feels welcomed here in the shop and to feel like they belong." However, Morial criticized the corporation for making the changes without consulting stakeholders including the National Urban League, which has been a partner of the superstore for two decades. DAILY NEWSLETTER: Sign up here to get the latest news and updates from the Mirror US straight to your inbox with our FREE newsletter. "They went from worst to first class when it comes to diversity," Morial said. "The idea that they would throw all of that away without any careful consultation with their partners, without any real serious evaluation of the success of these programs, is what dismays me." Among other changes, Walmart announced it will no longer give priority treatment to suppliers owned by women or minorities. The company also will not renew a five-year commitment for a racial equity center set up in 2020 after the police killing of George Floyd. And it pulled out of a prominent gay rights index. "One value of this nation is equal opportunity," Morial said. "That’s all equity, diversity and inclusion is about. It’s about creating a level playing field for all." He mentioned that DEI has been "smeared" by a "hate mob." "Diversity, equity and inclusion were a set of terms designed to create a positive, if you will, image and a positive conversation about an America for all, an America that is open to all," he claimed. "DEI does not favor, it opens doors that have historically been closed," Morial further explained.The threats are growing! Donald Trump promises more tariffs on China and Mexico over the flow of fentanyl and immigrants
OTTAWA — The union representing rank-and-file Mounties is welcoming a federal plan to spend $1.3 billion to bolster border security and ensure the integrity of the immigration system. In its fall economic update Monday, the Liberal government said it would invest in cutting-edge technology for law enforcement, so that only people who are eligible to remain in Canada do so. The money, to be spread over six fiscal years, is earmarked for the RCMP, Public Safety Canada, the Canada Border Services Agency and the cyberspies at the Communications Security Establishment. RCMP members enforce laws between official points of entry and investigate criminal activities related to the border. National Police Federation president Brian Sauvé says members have been protecting the border with limited resources, and the new money will allow them to continue delivering on their mandate. Public Safety Minister Dominic LeBlanc is expected to join other ministers this afternoon to provide more details on the plan. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Dec. 17, 2024. Jim Bronskill, The Canadian PressDemocrat Who Beat Out AOC For Top Oversight Job Violated Federal Insider Trading and Conflicts-of-Interest Law, Report Claims
Economy Minister Marcelo Ebrard said Wednesday that the United States would be shooting itself in the foot if it imposes a 25% tariff on Mexican exports, as Donald Trump has pledged to do. Speaking at President Claudia Sheinbaum’s morning press conference, Ebrard said that 400,000 jobs would be lost in the United States if Trump imposes the tariff he threatened to implement in a post to his social media site Truth Social on Monday. The U.S. president-elect said that his proposed 25% tariff on Mexican and Canadian imports would be imposed on the first day of his second term and remain in effect “until such time as Drugs, in particular Fentanyl, and all Illegal Aliens stop this Invasion of our Country!” Ebrard highlighted on Wednesday that a 25% tariff on Mexican exports would affect companies in the United States that operate in Mexico, “particularly” automakers that have long had a manufacturing presence here such as General Motors, Stellantis and Ford. “What [Trump] is saying is, ‘Dear fellows, we are going to impose a tax on the most important North American companies in the world,'” he said. Ebrard noted that retaliatory tariffs on United States exports – as Sheinbaum said Mexico would impose – would also affect General Motors, Stellantis and Ford because they send auto parts from the U.S. to their plants in Mexico. “We’re very integrated, we bring some things from the United States, we produce others here, we incorporate them and you see it as a final product,” he said. Ebrard stressed that a 25% tariff “is a tax” that would have an outsized impact on the auto sector in North America, “whose main exponents are these three large groups from the United States itself.” “In other words, it’s a shot in the foot,” he said. “The taxes – I say ‘taxes’ because a tariff is a tax; the 25% proposed tax would have a direct impact on [U.S.] companies because it’s equivalent to doubling the tax on profits,” Ebrard said, referring to the 21% corporate tax rate in the United States. “In the end,” Ebrard added, a 25% tariff would “affect the consumer in the United States” and “around 400,000 jobs” in the U.S. “would be lost.” That figure, he explained, is an estimate made by the Economy Ministry after consultation with the auto sector in the United States. “That is the estimated impact that we’ve been able to calculate between the [tariff] announcement and now,” Ebrard said. “... The main impact of this measure is on the consumer in the United States and United States companies [including] the three largest of the North American automotive industry. That’s why we say it’s a shot in the foot.” Analysts at Barclays, Reuters reported , estimate that Trump’s proposed tariff “could wipe out effectively all profits” of General Motors, Stellantis and Ford, known as the “big three” among U.S. automakers. “While it’s generally understood that a blanket 25% tariff on any vehicles or content from Mexico or Canada could be disruptive, investors underappreciate how disruptive this could be,” the analysts wrote in a note on Tuesday. Ebrard said “there are two options on the table” for Mexico, the United States and Canada, the three signatories to the USMCA free trade pact that is scheduled to be reviewed in 2026. “We can fragment and divide ourselves with accusations and tariffs – we can do that if we want ...or we can together build a strong, competitive region that is prepared to lead the future and compete with other regions,” he said. Mexico’s objective, “of course,” is to “create a strong region and not conflict and division,” Ebrard said. The economy minister said that “the proposal that Mexico will prepare to achieve this” will be based on having “regional stability,” ensuring “shared prosperity” and increasing North America’s “global competitiveness.” “We have to cooperate on security, on migration, on governance, on many issues,” Ebrard said. Whether the Sheinbaum administration will be prepared to deploy additional monetary and human resources to combat the flow of migrants and drugs to the United States in order to stave off a 25% tariff on its exports remains to be seen, but the government led by former president Andrés Manuel López Obrador agreed to do so when Trump issued a tariff threat in 2019. In a letter she sent to Trump on Tuesday, Sheinbaum highlighted the efforts Mexico is already making to reduce the number of migrants and the amount of drugs reaching the United States and gave no indication that Mexico was ready and willing to do more. However, Trump is clearly dissatisfied with Mexico’s existing efforts and appears determined to get Mexico to ramp up enforcement against migrants and drug traffickers. Tonatiuh Guillén , head of Mexico’s National Immigration Institute for the first six months of López Obrador’s six-year term, said earlier this month that the likelihood that Mexico will give in to pressure from Trump, as it did in 2019 , is “high.” With regard to “shared prosperity,” Ebrard said it should be an “objective” of Mexico, the United States and Canada. Sheinbaum has made “shared prosperity” a priority of her government as it seeks to reduce wealth inequality in Mexico and ensure that foreign investment is spread more equitably across the country . Ebrard said that “everything that goes against shared prosperity,” including “unnecessary taxes,” is inadvisable. “... Tariffs fragment us, hinder the work of industry, cause jobs and competitiveness to be lost,” he said. “The United States is affected first and foremost, but others are affected as well, Mexico and other partners.” To increase North America’s global competitiveness, Mexico, the United States and Canada need to “optimize regional supply chains, maintain low costs ... and work as a team,” Ebrard said. “This [idea] has a lot of support in Mexico, in the United States and in Canada as well, and we think it is the correct, intelligent route for the circumstances the world is going through,” he said. “... So, presidenta , we’re already working on this, on the strategy you gave us,” Ebrard told Sheinbaum. “And we’re also accelerating conversations with the European Union to finish the modernization of the [trade] agreement with the European Union,” he said, adding that the ministry he leads is also “accelerating agreements with countries such as Brazil.” By Mexico News Daily chief staff writer Peter Davies ( [email protected] )
Stock market today: Dow eyes longest losing streak since 1978 as stocks slide ahead of Fed decisionWisconsin faces its first losing season in 23 years and the end of a bowl streak when the Badgers host arch-rival Minnesota on Friday in the annual Big Ten battle for Paul Bunyan's Axe. Minnesota (6-5, 4-4) lost to No. 4 Penn State 26-25. Wisconsin (5-6, 3-5 Big Ten) lost its fourth straight, 44-25, at Nebraska in a game that was not as close as the score. "Well 1890 is the first time we played this football team coming up and this is what it's all about," Minnesota coach P.J. Fleck said of the rivalry. "And you wouldn't want to have it any other way, being able to end the season with one of your biggest rivals. I know our guys will be ready to go, ready to play." Wisconsin has 22 consecutive winning seasons since going 5-7 under Barry Alvarez in 2001, the longest active streak among Power 4 teams. The Badgers also have played in a bowl game in each of the last 22 seasons, the longest active streak in the Big Ten and third-longest in FBS. Wisconsin coach Luke Fickell is more concerned with the rivalry game than the winning season and bowl streaks. "I'm not downplaying it, I'm not saying it's not important, I'm not saying it's another thing that's on our plate," Fickell said Monday. "But when it gets down to this last week, it's about one thing, it's about the rivalry. It's about preparing to play in the most important game of the year." The Gophers have dropped their last two games after winning four in a row. Minnesota averages 26.6 points per game, while allowing 18.5, 15th-best in the country. Max Brosmer has completed 67 percent of his passes for 221 per game with 15 touchdowns and five interceptions. Daniel Jackson is the top target with 69 catches for 802 yards and three scores, and Darius Taylor is the top rusher with 730 yards at 4.8 per carry with nine touchdowns. One week after leading Oregon after three quarters, the Wisconsin defense was shredded for 473 yards and five touchdowns by Nebraska. Braedyn Locke, who took over at quarterback when Tyler Van Dyke suffered an early season-ending knee injury, has thrown at least one interception in eight consecutive games. Locke has completed 56.4 percent of his passes for 180.6 yards per game, with 12 touchdowns and 10 picks. Tawee Walker is the leading rusher with 828 yards at 4.7 per carry with 10 touchdowns. He has failed to reach 60 yards in three of the last four games. Former Wisconsin and NFL standout JJ Watt posted on social media his assessment - and frustration - with the Badgers after the Nebraska game. "Losing happens, it's part of the game. Hearing announcers talk about how much tougher and more physical Nebraska & Iowa are while getting blown out ... that's the issue," Watt wrote on X. "We are Wisconsin. Physicality, running game, great O-Line and great defense. That is our identity." Wisconsin defeated the Gophers 28-14 last after Minnesota had won the previous two meetings. The Badgers have won 7 of the last 10 and lead the storied series 63-62-8. --Field Level Media
Many Australians have grappled with financial challenges this year. Rental affordability is at record lows in almost every capital city and region, interest rates haven't budged in over a year, and millions of people are experiencing food insecurity . Treasurer Jim Chalmers acknowledged earlier this month that while the economic situation was improving, many Australians were still under "substantial" financial pressure. "We're making good progress in the fight against inflation. We're making good progress when it comes to the key economic indicators. But we know that that doesn't always translate into how people are feeling or faring in the economy," he said. So will the cost of living improve in 2025? Here's what economists think. What will happen with inflation in 2025? Annual headline inflation was 2.8 per cent in the September quarter of 2024, a significant drop from the June figure of 3.8 per cent. The main reason cited by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) for that decrease was a fall in electricity prices, as a result of government energy rebates, and lower petrol prices. The trimmed mean — a measure of underlying inflation that removes the biggest price swings — was 3.5 per cent in the September quarter, down from 4 per cent in June. Source: SBS News Sean Langcake, head of macroeconomic forecasting at Oxford Economics Australia, told SBS News: "The headline inflation number is important because it is the reality of what most people are paying out of their budget, and it's really great that that's come back down within the RBA's target range." "But the trouble there is that the underlying measure gives you a better read of where things are going to be in the future. "The big problem we have that's keeping inflation elevated is that the trend we have in productivity is really poor and we need to see some improvement there for inflation to make a bit more progress." John Hawkins, a senior lecturer at the University of Canberra's School of Politics, Economics and Society, said he expected that, overall, inflation would "continue to moderate" next year. 'Nothing short of alarming': The full-time workers being priced out of the rental market Petrol prices were "always volatile", Hawkins noted, and whether they went up or down would depend on what happened in the Middle East. "If things are quiet there, relatively, then there won't be an inflationary stimulus from that," he told SBS News. Hawkins said food prices should remain relatively stable, barring any major weather events decimating crops, while home insurance costs would likely keep rising as a result of increasing climate-related claims. The price of products like clothing and cars have either been flat for years or have been gradually coming down — and that would "probably" continue in 2025, he said. The cost of things like education and health insurance should also continue to ease somewhat, Langcake said, "not least because we're gradually moving into a lower inflation environment". While rents have been rising more steadily, he warned significant relief was unlikely any time soon. "Equally, the cost of building a new house has stayed a little bit more elevated than we might've expected ... which is all kind of adding to the conundrum of it being difficult to add housing supply to the market," Langcake said. How much will wages and Centrelink payments rise in 2025? Annual wage growth was 3.5 per cent in the September 2024 quarter, according to the ABS. "It's settled into a pace of about 0.8 of a percentage point each quarter, at the moment — that's fairly healthy by historic standards," Langcake said. As long as there isn't a large spike in unemployment, it should continue to increase at similar rates throughout 2025, he said. That would put wage growth slightly ahead of underlying inflation, meaning you may end up with a little bit of extra money in your pocket. New year, new career? The jobs that had the biggest pre-Christmas salary increases From 1 January, more than a million Australians will also get a modest financial boost thanks to the indexation of certain Centrelink payments. Youth Allowance and Austudy recipients will get up to $30.60 extra each fortnight, while ABSTUDY payments will increase by as much as $54. Disability Support Pension recipients who are under 21 years old and don't have any dependent children will get up to $30.10 more, and the Carer Allowance will increase by $5.80. You can see the full list of payments being increased here . Other Centrelink payments will be indexed throughout the year. Will there be an interest rate cut in 2025? At its final board meeting for 2024, the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) left the official cash rate on hold at 4.35 per cent. The board said while it had gained "some confidence" that inflation was "moving sustainably towards its target", it remained "too high" to cut rates at this stage . The RBA's target range for inflation is 2 to 3 per cent. Hawkins said depending on what the inflation figures for the December quarter were, it was "quite possible" the RBA could start cutting rates at its next meeting in February. "If it's surprisingly high, then I think they won't cut them — but if inflation continues on that downward trend that it has been on since the end of 2022, then I think they probably would feel that it's time to start the easing process," he said. Source: SBS News But Langcake doesn't think the RBA would move that soon. "I think they're still going to want to see two inflation periods where things improve further, and that puts us to May being the earliest possible time for a cut," he said. Langcake predicted we'd have three rate cuts in 2025, likely by 0.25 per cent each time. If that happens, interest rates will be sitting at 3.6 per cent by the end of next year. What impact could the 2025 federal election have on the cost of living? The exact date for the next federal election is yet to be announced, but experts have narrowed it down to some time between March and May . Labor has repeatedly said tackling the cost of living is one of its priorities — and has already made some election promises, including subsidising childcare and reducing university fees and student debt . The March budget could include further targeted cost of living measures, Hawkins said. "It wouldn't surprise me, for example, if your electricity rebates get extended, otherwise electricity prices are going to jump back up in the middle of next year and headline inflation will jump up," he said. But Langcake cautioned Labor won't have much room to move if it wants to keep government spending under control. Worsening deficits, higher spending: Jim Chalmers unveils mid-year budget update "If they are sticking to a goal of running not too large a deficit, it's going to be hard for them to hand out too many goodies," Langcake said. It's harder to know what cost of living relief the Coalition would promise voters, Hawkins said. "At this stage, we haven't really got a lot of detail on what their policies are." Langcake said overall, he didn't expect there to be a significant difference in the cost of living policies put forward by the two major parties. "I think it'll be a lot of, 'We'll promise voters this', and then the other team says, 'Yeah, we'll do that too', and you get to pretty fine margins in terms of what the actual difference is."
OTTAWA — The RCMP will create a new aerial intelligence task force to provide round-the-clock surveillance of Canada’s border using helicopters, drones and surveillance towers. The move is part of the federal government’s $1.3-billion upgrade to border security and monitoring to appease concerns of U.S. president-elect Donald Trump about the flow of migrants and illegal drugs. Trump has threatened to impose a 25 per cent tariff on all Canadian and Mexican exports to the U.S. as soon as he is inaugurated next month unless both countries move to improve border security. Public Safety Minister Dominic LeBlanc says he has discussed parts of the plan with American officials and that he is optimistic about its reception. Canada will also propose to the United States to create a North American “joint strike force” to target organized crime groups that work across borders. The government also intends to provide new technology, tools and resources to the Canada Border Services Agency to seek out fentanyl using chemical detection, artificial intelligence and canine teams. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Dec. 17, 2024. Jim Bronskill, The Canadian PressDescribed as a "reluctant king" in his first stint as prime minister, the soft-spoken Manmohan Singh, who died on Thursday at 92, was arguably one of India's most successful leaders. Singh, the first Sikh to lead his nation, was prime minister from 2004 to 2014, serving a rare two terms. He had been undergoing care for age-related medical conditions. He is credited with steering India to unprecedented economic growth and lifting hundreds of millions out of dire poverty. He went on to serve a rare second term. "India mourns the loss of one of its most distinguished leaders," said Prime Minister Narendra Modi. He applauded the economist-turned-politician's body of work. Singh and chief of India's Congress Party, Sonia Gandhi, in New Delhi, in March 2014. Singh was asked to take on the job by Gandhi, who led the center-left Congress Party to a surprise victory. Italian by birth, she feared her ancestry would be used by Hindu-nationalist opponents to attack the government if she were to lead the country. (Adnan Abidi/Reuters) Born into a poor family in a part of British-ruled India now in Pakistan, Singh studied by candlelight to win a place at Cambridge University before heading to Oxford, earning a doctorate with a thesis on the role of exports and free trade in India's economy. He became a respected economist, then India's central bank governor and a government advisor, but had no apparent plans for a political career when he was suddenly tapped to become finance minister in 1991. During that tenure to 1996, Singh was the architect of reforms that saved India's economy from a severe balance of payments crisis, promoted deregulation and other measures that opened an insular country to the world. Analysis India election: The promise and challenges facing new leader Narendra Modi Famously quoting Victor Hugo in his maiden budget speech, he said: "No power on earth can stop an idea whose time has come," before adding: "The emergence of India as a major economic power in the world happens to be one such idea." Singh's ascension to prime minister in 2004 was even more unexpected. He was asked to take on the job by Sonia Gandhi, who led the center-left Congress Party to a surprise victory. Italian by birth, she feared her ancestry would be used by Hindu-nationalist opponents to attack the government if she were to lead the country. Singh was the architect of reforms that saved India's economy from a severe balance of payments crisis, promoted deregulation and other measures that opened an insular country to the world. (Prakash Singh/Reuters) Riding an unprecedented period of economic growth, Singh's government shared the spoils of the country's new-found wealth, introducing welfare schemes such as a jobs program for the rural poor. In 2008, his government also clinched a landmark deal that permitted peaceful trade in nuclear energy with the United States for the first time in three decades, paving the way for strong relations between New Delhi and Washington. But his efforts to further open up the Indian economy were frequently frustrated by political wrangling within his own party and demands made by coalition partners. 'History will be kinder to me' And while he was widely respected by other world leaders, at home Singh always had to fend off the perception that Sonia Gandhi was the real power in the government. The widow of former prime minister Rajiv Gandhi, whose family has dominated Indian politics since independence from Britain in 1947, she remained Congress Party leader and often made key decisions. Known for his simple lifestyle and with a reputation for honesty, Singh was not personally seen as corrupt. But he came under attack for failing to crack down on members of his government as a series of scandals erupted in his second term, triggering mass protests. Singh shakes hands with Prime Minister Stephen Harper, right, during a bilateral meeting in Toronto, in June 2010. (Chris Wattie/Reuters) The latter years of his premiership saw India's growth story, which he had helped engineer, wobble as global economic turbulence and slow government decision-making battered investment sentiment. In 2012, his government was tipped into a minority after the Congress Party's biggest ally quit their coalition in protest at the entry of foreign supermarkets. Two years later Congress was decisively swept aside by the Bharatiya Janata Party under Narendra Modi, a strongman who promised to end the economic standstill, clean up graft and bring inclusive growth to the hinterlands. But at a press conference just months before he left office, Singh insisted he had done the best he could. "I honestly believe that history will be kinder to me than the contemporary media or, for that matter, the opposition parties in parliament," he said. Singh is survived by his wife and three daughters. Singh is seen speaking with Gujarat's chief minister and Hindu nationalist Narendra Modi, the prime ministerial candidate for India's main opposition Bharatiya Janata Party in the western Indian city of Ahmedabad, in October 2013. (Amit Dave/Reuters)Beacon Biosignals Reports Novel Sleep EEG Results from Multiple Industry Collaborations at the ...
FrankSpeech Broadcast Network Surges in Q3 2024: Record Growth in Viewers and Platform Expansion
Warner Music Group (WMG) Q4 2024 Earnings Call Transcript