m.jilibet
Welshman Ncube faction of the CCC was outsmarted by Sengezo TshabanguHSFTOOLS Expands the Thermal Imaging Market with a Focus on Practical ApplicationsBarrister cleared of misconduct calls on head of Bar Standards Board to resign
Lil Wayne, GloRilla, Camila Cabello to perform at College Football National Championship
NAIROBI, Kenya (AP) — Three African politicians seeking to head the African Union detailed their plans on Friday for regional security amid conflicts and political coups while strongly advocating for inter-Africa trade among other issues. Raila Odinga of Kenya, Mahamoud Ali Youssouf of Djibouti and Richard Randriamandrato of Madagascar are seeking to be elected as chairperson for the 55-member state African Union. Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.
Iconic retail food manufacturer files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
In search for U.S. journalist Austin Tice, a clue from 11 years agoA quick recap of Monday's Class D-1 state championship game at Memorial Stadium. Final: Sandy Creek 44, Stanton 42. Turning point: Sandy Creek's Connor Rempe making an open-field tackle to stop Stanton's Barrett Wilke on fourth-and-1 with 4:07 left in the fourth quarter. Trailing 44-42, Stanton was near midfield as it tried to embark on a go-ahead drive. Rempe, who is 5-foot-8 and 155 pounds, made a solo tackle on Wilke, the 6-foot, 210-pounder who is one of the most prolific runners in the state. It was over when ...: Sandy Creek's Ethan Shaw scampered for 12 yards on fourth-and-3 with 1:54 left and the Cougars protecting a 44-42 lead. Shaw was patient in waiting for a lane, and then burst by a defender to get into open space. Game ball: Shaw, who threw for three touchdowns and rushed for 178 yards and two more scores. Rempe, too, for the big tackle. People are also reading... Talking hardware: It's Sandy Creek's first title. Get in the game with our Prep Sports Newsletter Sent weekly directly to your inbox!ECB suspends Bangladesh's Shakib for 'illegal bowling'
Alarm grew in France on Friday over the fate of a prominent French-Algerian novelist detained in the country of his birth, with his publisher urging his immediate release and President Emmanuel Macron closely following the case. Boualem Sansal, a major figure in francophone modern literature, is known for his strong stances against both authoritarianism and Islamism as well as being a forthright campaigner on freedom of expression issues. His detention by Algeria comes against a background of tensions between France and its former colony which have also appear to have spread to the literary world. The 75-year-old writer, granted French nationality this year, was on Saturday arrested at Algiers airport after returning from France, according to several media reports including the Marianne weekly. The Gallimard publishing house, which has published his work for a quarter of a century, in a statement expressed "its very deep concern following the arrest of the writer by the Algerian security services", calling for his "immediate release". There has been no confirmation from the Algerian authorities of his arrest and no other details about his situation. Macron is "very concerned by the disappearance" of Sansal, said a French presidential official, asking not to be named. "State services are mobilised to clarify his situation," the official said, adding that "the president expresses his unwavering attachment to the freedom of a great writer and intellectual." A relative latecomer to writing, Sansal turned to novels in 1999 and has tackled subjects including the horrific 1990s civil war between authorities and Islamists. His books are not banned in Algeria but he is a controversial figure, particularly since making a visit to Israel in 2014. Sansal's hatred of Islamism has not been confined to Algeria and he has also warned of a creeping Islamisation in France, a stance that has made him a favoured author of prominent figures on the right and far-right. Prominent politicians from this side of the political spectrum rushed to echo Macron's expression of concern for the writer. Centre-right former premier and candidate in 2027 presidential elections Edouard Philippe wrote on X that Sansal "embodies everything we cherish: the call for reason, freedom and humanism against censorship, corruption and Islamism." Far-right figurehead Marine Le Pen, another possible 2027 contender, said: "This freedom fighter and courageous opponent of Islamism has reportedly been arrested by the Algerian regime. This is an unacceptable situation." In 2015, Sansal won the Grand Prix du Roman of the French Academy, the guardians of the French language, for his book "2084: The End of the World", a dystopian novel inspired by George Orwell's "Nineteen-Eighty Four" and set in an Islamist totalitarian world in the aftermath of a nuclear holocaust. His publisher said that Sansal's novels and essays "exposed the obscurantisms of all kinds which are tragically affecting the way of the world." The concerns about his reported arrest come as another prominent French-Algerian writer Kamel Daoud is under attack over his novel "Houris", which won France's top literary prize, the Goncourt. A woman has claimed the book was based on her story of surviving 1990s Islamist massacres and used without her consent. She alleged on Algerian television that Daoud used the story she confidentially recounted to a therapist -- who is now his wife -- during treatment. His publisher has denied the claims. The controversies are taking place in a tense diplomatic context between France and Algeria, after Macron renewed French support for Moroccan sovereignty over the disputed territory of Western Sahara during a landmark visit to the kingdom last month. Western Sahara, a former Spanish colony, is de facto controlled for the most part by Morocco. But it is claimed by the Sahrawi separatists of the Polisario Front, who are demanding a self-determination referendum and are supported by Algiers. Daoud meanwhile has called for Sansal's release, writing in the right-wing Le Figaro: "I sincerely hope that my friend Boualem will return to us very soon", while expressing his bafflement in the face of the "imprudence" that Sansal allegedly showed in going to Algeria. dax-vl-sjw/giv Get any of our free email newsletters — news headlines, sports, arts & entertainment, state legislature, CFD news, and more.
Inside the mind of Pep Guardiola as he suffers sleepless nights and lives on soup during horror Man City runNAIROBI, Kenya (AP) — Three African politicians seeking to head the African Union detailed their plans on Friday for regional security amid conflicts and political coups while strongly advocating for inter-Africa trade among other issues. Raila Odinga of Kenya, Mahamoud Ali Youssouf of Djibouti and Richard Randriamandrato of Madagascar are seeking to be elected as chairperson for the 55-member state African Union. They participated in a two-hour debate Friday in Ethiopian capital Addis Ababa in which they all advocated for two permanent seats for African countries in the U.N. Security Council to effectively represent the continent with the youngest population. Odinga said that two permanent seats with veto power were “a must for Africa” and that this was “only fair” since the continent has more than 50 countries. Randriamandrato urged member states to cease the opportunity and “speak with one voice on the choice of who will represent Africa in the UNSC.” The three are seeking to convince most African countries before the February election to succeed African Union Chairperson Moussa Faki, who has served for two terms. The African Union has faced several challenges that include conflict in member countries and political coups that have seen five member states expelled from the union, making regional security a major theme in Friday’s debate. Youssouf said that regional security could be enhanced if the resources for a regional standby force were increased to reduce the overreliance on foreign partnerships for resources. “When there is no unity of purpose among neighboring countries peace will be compromised,” Youseff said. Randriamandrato encouraged countries to take charge of their internal security while cautioning that foreign military bases should be “a thing of the past” because they “could be a source of conflict.” Despite the continent’s young population of 1.3 billion that is set to double by 2050, regional trade has faced challenges that were addressed in the Friday debate. Odinga said that Africa had a “huge domestic market” that it could leverage on for economic transformation by opening up opportunities for trade between African countries. Youssouf proposed a payment compensation system that would ensure countries don't lose out while trading in different currencies adding, “are we going to have a single currency, why not?” Randriamandrato said that regional economic blocs like the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa had a huge role to play in easing inter-Africa trade. The African Union has several proposed reforms on its structure and leadership aimed at achieving its purpose, and all candidates promised to implement the reforms if elected. Youssouf said that key reforms in the union were facing a funding bottleneck and that “it has to change,” adding that he wouldn't impose it on member states but would “advocate for it.”
Share Tweet Share Share Email If you’ve purchased a new or used vehicle in California and are struggling with persistent mechanical issues that just don’t seem to get resolved, you may be wondering whether you are entitled to a remedy under California’s Lemon Law. This law exists to protect consumers from vehicles that repeatedly fail to meet standards of quality, safety, and usability. Los Angeles Chevrolet lemon law attorneys are here to help you navigate this process and determine if your car qualifies as a lemon. California’s Lemon Law, formally known as the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, is designed to provide protection for consumers who purchase or lease cars that have substantial defects. If your car is under warranty and has been repeatedly repaired for the same or similar issues, you may have grounds for a lemon law claim. In this article, we’ll explore the key factors that determine whether your car qualifies under the law and what steps you can take if you think your vehicle might be a lemon. What Is California’s Lemon Law? California’s Lemon Law is a consumer protection law that covers the repair or replacement of defective vehicles. If you purchase a new or used car that is under warranty, and that car has a significant defect that cannot be fixed within a reasonable number of repair attempts, you may be entitled to a buyback or replacement vehicle. The law is designed to ensure that consumers are not stuck with faulty vehicles that impair their safety, use, or value. The Lemon Law applies to new vehicles, including cars, trucks, motorcycles, and SUVs. It also applies to used vehicles if they are still under the manufacturer’s warranty at the time of the purchase. Defects covered under the Lemon Law typically affect the vehicle’s safety, use, or value, such as problems with the engine, transmission, brakes, electrical system, or airbags. Cosmetic issues, like paint chips or small scratches, do not usually qualify. If your car has been in the shop multiple times for the same issue or has been out of service for an extended period, you may have a valid claim under California’s Lemon Law. Los Angeles Chevrolet lemon law attorneys are here to help determine whether your car fits the criteria and guide you through the process. How to Determine If Your Car Qualifies Under California Lemon Laws To qualify under the California Lemon Law, your vehicle must meet specific criteria. Below are the most important factors to consider when determining whether your car qualifies: 1. Warranty Coverage The first key factor in determining whether your car qualifies under California’s Lemon Law is whether the car is still covered by a manufacturer’s warranty. If your car is no longer covered by a warranty, it may not be eligible for lemon law protection. However, some used vehicles may still be under a manufacturer’s warranty, in which case you may still qualify. New Cars: If you bought a new car, it is almost certainly under warranty. These warranties typically last 3 years or 36,000 miles, but this can vary by manufacturer. The warranty should cover most defects that occur within that time period, including repairs to major systems such as the engine, transmission, and safety features. Used Cars: If you bought a used car, it must be covered by the manufacturer’s warranty at the time of purchase. Certified pre-owned cars often come with a manufacturer’s warranty, which may provide lemon law protection. Check your warranty documentation to see if your used car qualifies. If your vehicle is out of warranty, it may still be eligible for other forms of legal action, but it will not be covered by the Lemon Law. 2. Repeated Repair Attempts for the Same Issue One of the most important criteria under California’s Lemon Law is whether the car has been repaired multiple times for the same issue. The manufacturer or dealership must be given a reasonable number of chances to fix the problem before the car is considered a lemon. California law typically requires that the vehicle be repaired at least two times for the same defect without success. However, there are certain situations where a single repair attempt may be sufficient. For example, if the defect is severe (like an issue with the braking or steering system), even one repair attempt may be enough. Additionally, if the vehicle has been in the shop for four or more attempts for different problems, this could also be grounds for a lemon law claim. Another important factor is if the car has been out of service for repairs for a total of 30 days or more due to defects. If your car has been in the shop for an extended period, it may be eligible for lemon law protection. 3. Serious Defects Affecting Safety, Usability, or Value To qualify under the Lemon Law, the defects must be substantial enough to affect the vehicle’s safety, usability, or overall value. Minor cosmetic defects, such as scratches or small dents, are generally not covered. However, if the defect impairs the car’s ability to function properly or poses a safety risk, it is likely to qualify. Some common defects that may qualify under the Lemon Law include: Engine problems (e.g., stalling, overheating, or loss of power) Transmission issues (e.g., slipping, failure to shift, or inability to engage gears) Brake system defects (e.g., brake failure, reduced braking power, or issues with anti-lock braking systems) Electrical problems (e.g., issues with the battery, lights, or electrical wiring) Safety system defects (e.g., airbags failing to deploy or seatbelt malfunctions) If the defect makes your car unsafe to drive or diminishes its value significantly, it is more likely that your vehicle will qualify under California’s Lemon Law. 4. Reasonable Opportunity for Repair The manufacturer or dealership must be given a reasonable opportunity to fix the defects. This typically means that the vehicle must have been brought in for repairs at least two or three times for the same issue before pursuing a Lemon Law claim. In the case of more serious safety issues (such as defects affecting the brakes or airbags), one repair attempt might be sufficient. If the car has been out of service for 30 or more days, you might also have a claim under the law. What Should You Do If You Think Your Car Is a Lemon? If you believe your car qualifies for a Lemon Law claim, the first step is to document the defects and the repairs made. Keep all receipts, invoices, and service records that show the repairs, including dates and descriptions of the defects. Next, it’s important to contact a lawyer who specializes in lemon law cases. Los Angeles Chevrolet lemon law attorneys are here to help guide you through the process and help you understand your legal options. An attorney will help you determine whether your car qualifies and can assist in filing a claim with the manufacturer. Once your attorney determines that you have a valid claim, they may send a demand letter to the manufacturer requesting either a buyback or a replacement vehicle. In many cases, the manufacturer will offer a settlement without the need for a lengthy court battle. If the manufacturer does not offer a satisfactory solution, your attorney can help you take the case to court. How to Choose the Right Lemon Law Attorney in Los Angeles If you’re facing issues with your vehicle and believe you may have a lemon law case, it’s crucial to choose the right lemon law attorney in Los Angeles. Here are some tips for selecting an attorney: Experience: Look for an attorney who has handled lemon law cases before and is familiar with the specific details of California’s Lemon Law. They should understand how the law applies to various types of vehicles and defects. No Upfront Fees: Many lemon law attorneys work on a contingency basis, meaning they only get paid if you win your case. This can make it easier for you to pursue a claim without worrying about upfront costs. Client Reviews : Look for reviews or testimonials from past clients to get an idea of the attorney’s success rate and customer service. Communication : Choose an attorney who communicates clearly and promptly, as lemon law cases can involve complex legal issues that require close attention. Conclusion If you’re experiencing recurring issues with your car that affect its safety, value, or usability, you may be entitled to a refund or replacement under California’s Lemon Law. Determining whether your car qualifies requires evaluating several key factors, including the severity of the defect, the number of repair attempts, and whether the vehicle is still under warranty. If you believe your car may be a lemon, Los Angeles Chevrolet lemon law attorneys are here to help you understand your rights and guide you through the legal process. Choose the right lemon law attorney in Los Angeles to help you navigate this process, ensuring that you are treated fairly and receive the compensation or replacement vehicle you deserve. Don’t let persistent defects ruin your driving experience—take the necessary steps to protect your consumer rights today. Related Items: Car , Lemon Laws Share Tweet Share Share Email Recommended for you The Benefits of Renting a Car in Dubai: A Guide for Travellers Top Applications of Satellite Technology for Cars Scrapping a car: How will I dispose of my old car in 2025? CommentsTerror stats Data shows counterterrorism operations led to killing of 341 terrorists, but sheer scale of threat remains overwhelmingly high In a sobering update presented to the National Assembly, the Ministry of Interior has revealed that Pakistan has experienced a staggering 1,566 terrorist incidents during the first 10 months of the ongoing year. These attacks have resulted in the tragic loss of at least 924 lives, including those of civilians and law-enforcement personnel. The data further indicates that counterterrorism operations led to the killing of 341 terrorists, but the sheer scale of the threat remains overwhelmingly high. Meanwhile, a report from the Ministry of Defence has highlighted Pakistan’s unique position as the frontline state against terrorism emanating from Afghanistan, bearing the brunt of terrorist activity linked to groups such as the TTP and ISIS-Khorasan (Daesh), with no other nation facing as severe an onslaught from these groups. The costs of this prolonged conflict are staggering: more than 90,000 casualties, direct economic losses amounting to $152 billion, and indirect losses estimated at $450 billion. The situation in Afghanistan, particularly following the Taliban’s return to power, has allowed terrorist groups increased freedom of movement, compounded by access to sophisticated military equipment left behind by the US. These reports paint a grim picture of the security landscape in Pakistan, one that is increasingly threatened by both local insurgents and cross-border militancy. However, the most alarming aspect of this situation is the lack of national attention given to the escalating threat of terrorism. Over the past two years, political chaos has dominated the discourse in Pakistan. Political elites have focused on power struggles, undermining efforts to tackle the real existential threat: terrorism. With more than 900 lives lost to terrorism-related violence in just 10 months, it is unconscionable that the political class continues to be consumed by internal disputes. Instead of prioritising national security, the country’s leaders have spent months embroiled in political wrangling. This political dysfunction has prevented the kind of coordinated national response needed to effectively combat terrorism. The recent events in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, whose provincial chief executive stormed the capital in defiance of the central government, are a stark example of how political priorities have been misplaced. The lack of cooperation between the federal government, provincial authorities, and law-enforcement agencies exacerbates the problem. Pakistan has long raised concerns about the Afghan Taliban’s unwillingness to take action against groups like the TTP, which continue to operate from Afghan soil. Despite repeated warnings from Pakistan, the Afghan Taliban regime has shown little interest in addressing the threat posed by these militant groups. The rise of terrorism in Pakistan following the fall of Kabul is not coincidental; it is a direct consequence of the Taliban’s refusal to act against the very groups that threaten Pakistan’s stability. The international community must apply pressure on the Afghan Taliban to put an end to cross-border terrorism and dismantle terrorist networks operating within Afghanistan. If left unchecked, the consequences of this escalating conflict could reverberate far beyond Pakistan’s borders. This rising tide of terrorism demands a unified, comprehensive response from all political factions, law-enforcement agencies, and security forces. Terrorism is not a political issue – it is a national security crisis. Until Pakistan’s leaders place the fight against terrorism at the top of the national agenda, the country will continue to suffer from its devastating consequences.
Authored by Jonathan Turley, From looking forward to harassment at restaurants to the purchase of Antifa-themed Christmas gifts, some appear to be planning for a hate-fest in the New Year... “May Trump supporters and Trump voters and Trump himself never know peace.” Those words, from Disney’s new Snow White actress Rachel Zegler, came shortly after half of the country, roughly 77 million Americans, voted for Donald Trump. Only a few weeks ago, Kamala Harris and her supporters were rallying the country to choose “love over hate.” Now, the “joy” is gone. Tis the season of the liberal hate-fest. As Washington prepares for the inauguration, we are seeing a return to rage. During the first Trump administration, liberal servers and restaurant owners pledged not to serve Trump officials. Now, the Washingtonian is reporting on the planned resumption of the harassment of those serving in the Trump administration. Zac Hoffman, manager at the National Democratic Club and “D.C. restaurant veteran,” told the magazine that abusing conservatives was only natural and understandable: “You expect the masses to just ignore RFK eating at Le Diplomate on a Sunday morning after a few mimosas and not to throw a drink in his face?” One bartender stated that: Trump people may “theoretically [have] the power to take away your rights, but I have the power to make you wait 20 minutes to get your entrée.” Suzannah Van Rooy, a server and manager at Beuchert’s Saloon on Capitol Hill, declared that she would not serve some Trump officials. “It’s not, ‘Oh, we hate Republicans,’” she said. “It’s that this person has moral convictions that are strongly opposed to mine, and I don’t feel comfortable serving them.” Beuchert’s later fired Van Rooy . This campaign of hate is all too familiar to conservatives. Many remember when White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders and her family were kicked out of the Red Hen restaurant in Lexington, Virginia. As others were denied service or chased from restaurants, Democratic members like Rep. Maxine Waters, D-CA, supported such harassment. For those restaurants not willing to follow the Red Hen model , the response was equally unhinged. Mariya Rusciano runs a D.C. pizza restaurant. She posted congratulations to Trump on X after the election to encourage everyone to come together as a nation. The response from Democrats was furious, filled with pledges to boycott the restaurant and force it out of business. It is not just service and civility that are scarce in Washington. Even while accusing Trump of putting his political and personal interests ahead of the nation, Biden is now reportedly moving to veto a bipartisan bill to relieve pressure on our overwhelmed court system. The Judges Act, supported by both Democrats and Republicans, would add 66 new judgeships to an over-worked court system. The White House supported the bill right up until Trump won the election. While some Democrats are still trying to get the White House to change its mind, liberal groups are applauding the expected veto “to prevent President Trump from having more vacancies.” If Biden carries out his threat, it will be not only gratuitous but illogical. The bill deliberately staggers the addition of judges over the next decade so that presidents of both parties will presumably be able to appoint them. Moreover, the Senate is still closely divided, and “blue-slipping” (whereby senators can hold up some nominations) remains in effect. More importantly, the reason for this bipartisan effort is due to a dire need for our courts. Judges are drowning in dockets with rising caseloads. In 2004, the number of cases in district court pending for more than three years was 18,280. This year, there are 81,617. If justice delayed is justice denied, our court system is becoming a tar pit of injustice, with litigants left without verdicts or relief for years. The word of the intended veto stripped away any pretense of the White House putting the public interest before politics. A veto would put rage before reason. In my recent book , I discussed how addictive rage is. People do not like to admit it, but they like being angry. Sometimes, people can choose madness as a release from reality. It offers a righteous license to slip from the bounds of civility and decency. It allows people to harass Republicans in restaurants or to scream profanities outside of their homes. It allows a president to say that he might block judgeships for a struggling court system, just because he does not want his successor to make any of the appointments. It is the reason 41 percent of adults under 30 believe that killing others, like healthcare executives, is justified, according to an Emerson College poll . We cannot seem to shake this rage addiction even after an election or during a holiday committed to peace and understanding. One liberal site, Crooked Media, is actually selling holiday items featuring the violent extremist group Antifa — one of the most anti-free speech groups in history, which routinely attacks journalists, speakers, and conservative demonstrators. Created by former Obama staffers Jon Favreau, Jon Lovett, and Tommy Vietor, the Crooked Media site is selling a line of Antifa items for liberals, including Antifa onesies for infants and “Antifa Dad” shirts to seemingly celebrate political violence. It seems the joy, bipartisanship, and civility have all expired like last year’s eggnog. Even Disney’s new Snow White seems to have taken the cue from the Evil Queen and treated this election as “ a blast of wind to fan my hate .” And we are not even at the inauguration yet. * * * Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro professor of public interest law at George Washington University and the author of “ The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage .”
Middle East latest: Syrians celebrate Assad's fall as US seeks a peaceful political transitionYour Secret Weapon This Holiday Shopping Season Could Be... ChatGPT?
Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management Market Growing Trends, Business Growth, Size, Future Scope, Segmentation, Dynamics and Forecast to 2028
New Orleans Pelicans star center Zion Williamson has started the conditioning phase of his rehab from a left hamstring strain and is expected to return to practice next week, the team announced Tuesday. Williamson, who is considered week-to-week, has been sidelined since Nov. 6. The two-time All-Star has played in just six games this season, averaging 22.7 points, 8.0 rebounds and 5.3 assists. New Orleans selected Williamson with the top overall pick in the 2019 NBA Draft. His time with the Pelicans has been marked by multiple injuries, starting with a torn meniscus during the preseason of his rookie year. Williamson has played in just 190 career games over five seasons, while also missing the entire 2021-22 campaign. He has averaged 24.6 points, 6.6 rebounds and 4.2 assists. --Field Level MediaYouths from the Blacksand area in Port Vila have launched a big cleanup campaign that began on Monday. The campaign kicked off at Tagabe and is set to conclude at the roundabout near the University of the South Pacific (USP) Emalus campus. Abel Kalo, Social Activity Coordinator of Divine Presbyterian Church at Blacksand, explained the initiative’s purpose is to engage local youth in positive activities while encouraging a sense of ownership and pride in the capital city. “By participating in the cleanup, the young people are not only improving the environment but also building a connection with Port Vila,” he said. The campaign spans key locations in Port Vila, with local leaders commending the initiative for its potential to instill community responsibility in the youth. “As the cleanup progresses, we encourage more youth from different parts of Port Vila to join, contributing to the city's cleanliness and well-being,” Kalo added. He also urged everyone to help maintain a cleaner city, emphasising its broader benefits. “A cleaner city promotes better health, attracts tourists, and fosters community pride. Port Vila is our home. Together, we can make it a shining example of cleanliness and sustainability,” Kalo stated. The Blacksand youths believe Port Vila Municipality should establish agreements with community groups dedicated to maintaining gardens, beautifying urban areas, and providing waste separation bins. “The city should enforce strict penalties for littering, water pollution, and air pollution, including from vehicles and plastics,” a spokesperson stressed.