8k8k 2 nguoi

8k8k 2 nguoi Fortis Group Advisors LLC lowered its holdings in Amazon.com, Inc. ( NASDAQ:AMZN ) by 1.8% during the third quarter, according to the company in its most recent Form 13F filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission. The firm owned 44,988 shares of the e-commerce giant’s stock after selling 820 shares during the quarter. Amazon.com accounts for about 1.5% of Fortis Group Advisors LLC’s investment portfolio, making the stock its 17th biggest position. Fortis Group Advisors LLC’s holdings in Amazon.com were worth $8,383,000 as of its most recent SEC filing. Several other hedge funds have also recently added to or reduced their stakes in AMZN. PayPay Securities Corp grew its holdings in shares of Amazon.com by 64.6% in the 2nd quarter. PayPay Securities Corp now owns 163 shares of the e-commerce giant’s stock worth $32,000 after purchasing an additional 64 shares during the last quarter. Hoese & Co LLP acquired a new position in Amazon.com in the third quarter valued at about $37,000. Christopher J. Hasenberg Inc grew its stake in Amazon.com by 650.0% during the second quarter. Christopher J. Hasenberg Inc now owns 300 shares of the e-commerce giant’s stock worth $58,000 after buying an additional 260 shares during the last quarter. Koesten Hirschmann & Crabtree INC. acquired a new stake in shares of Amazon.com during the first quarter worth approximately $69,000. Finally, Innealta Capital LLC bought a new position in shares of Amazon.com in the second quarter valued at approximately $77,000. Institutional investors and hedge funds own 72.20% of the company’s stock. Analysts Set New Price Targets A number of research firms recently commented on AMZN. Rosenblatt Securities increased their price target on Amazon.com from $221.00 to $236.00 and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a research report on Friday, November 1st. Jefferies Financial Group raised their target price on Amazon.com from $225.00 to $235.00 and gave the company a “buy” rating in a research note on Friday, November 1st. Barclays lifted their price target on Amazon.com from $220.00 to $235.00 and gave the company an “overweight” rating in a report on Friday, August 2nd. Telsey Advisory Group raised their price objective on shares of Amazon.com from $215.00 to $235.00 and gave the company an “outperform” rating in a research report on Friday, November 1st. Finally, Piper Sandler upped their target price on shares of Amazon.com from $215.00 to $225.00 and gave the stock an “overweight” rating in a research report on Friday, November 1st. Two analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating, forty have given a buy rating and one has given a strong buy rating to the company’s stock. According to MarketBeat.com, the stock presently has an average rating of “Moderate Buy” and an average target price of $235.77. Amazon.com Stock Performance Shares of AMZN opened at $197.12 on Friday. The firm’s 50 day moving average price is $193.00 and its two-hundred day moving average price is $186.31. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.21, a quick ratio of 0.87 and a current ratio of 1.09. Amazon.com, Inc. has a twelve month low of $142.81 and a twelve month high of $215.90. The firm has a market cap of $2.07 trillion, a P/E ratio of 42.21, a PEG ratio of 1.33 and a beta of 1.14. Amazon.com ( NASDAQ:AMZN – Get Free Report ) last announced its earnings results on Thursday, October 31st. The e-commerce giant reported $1.43 earnings per share for the quarter, topping analysts’ consensus estimates of $1.14 by $0.29. The firm had revenue of $158.88 billion during the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $157.28 billion. Amazon.com had a net margin of 8.04% and a return on equity of 22.41%. The company’s revenue for the quarter was up 11.0% compared to the same quarter last year. During the same period in the prior year, the business earned $0.85 EPS. On average, analysts forecast that Amazon.com, Inc. will post 5.27 EPS for the current fiscal year. Insider Activity at Amazon.com In related news, Director Daniel P. Huttenlocher sold 1,237 shares of the stock in a transaction on Tuesday, November 19th. The shares were sold at an average price of $199.06, for a total transaction of $246,237.22. Following the completion of the transaction, the director now owns 24,912 shares in the company, valued at approximately $4,958,982.72. This represents a 4.73 % decrease in their ownership of the stock. The sale was disclosed in a document filed with the SEC, which can be accessed through this hyperlink . Also, SVP David Zapolsky sold 2,190 shares of Amazon.com stock in a transaction on Tuesday, September 24th. The shares were sold at an average price of $195.00, for a total transaction of $427,050.00. Following the completion of the sale, the senior vice president now owns 62,420 shares in the company, valued at $12,171,900. The trade was a 3.39 % decrease in their ownership of the stock. The disclosure for this sale can be found here . In the last quarter, insiders have sold 6,011,423 shares of company stock valued at $1,249,093,896. 10.80% of the stock is owned by insiders. About Amazon.com ( Free Report ) Amazon.com, Inc engages in the retail sale of consumer products, advertising, and subscriptions service through online and physical stores in North America and internationally. The company operates through three segments: North America, International, and Amazon Web Services (AWS). It also manufactures and sells electronic devices, including Kindle, Fire tablets, Fire TVs, Echo, Ring, Blink, and eero; and develops and produces media content. See Also Five stocks we like better than Amazon.com Best of the list of Dividend Aristocrats: Build wealth with the aristocrat index Vertiv’s Cool Tech Makes Its Stock Red-Hot Roth IRA Calculator: Calculate Your Potential Returns MarketBeat Week in Review – 11/18 – 11/22 Canadian Penny Stocks: Can They Make You Rich? 2 Finance Stocks With Competitive Advantages You Can’t Ignore Want to see what other hedge funds are holding AMZN? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for Amazon.com, Inc. ( NASDAQ:AMZN – Free Report ). Receive News & Ratings for Amazon.com Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Amazon.com and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .With the imminent full-scale rollout of personal pension plans, individuals are set to embark on a journey towards securing their future financial well-being. The opportunity to open accounts and start contributing represents a new chapter in retirement planning, offering a fresh start and a chance to take control of one's financial future.

Conditions in abandoned mine are too dangerous for crew searching for Pennsylvania woman

In 1979, General Electric Co. ( GE ) introduced its famous tagline: “We bring good things to life.” One of the things this iconic American company brought to life this year was GE Vernova Inc. ( GEV ) – which GE spun out as a new standalone entity in April. This “purpose-built company” combined GE Renewable Energy, GE Power, and GE Digital. As the company states, it “is uniquely positioned to lead customers through the energy transition” to solve the “energy trilemma of reliability, affordability, and sustainability.” The company is already making strides... nuclear ones, at that. This weekend, CNBC reported that GE Vernova is planning to set up small nuclear reactors across the developed world. This deployment will happen over the next decade. Nicole Holmes, chief commercial officer at GE Vernova’s nuclear unit, GE Hitachi, said that the company’s small modular reactors (SMRs) promise to reduce the cost of building new nuclear plants. An SMR is a type of advanced nuclear reactor that can produce electricity. It has a smaller footprint and can be constructed faster than traditional reactors. They are about a third the size of the average reactors in the current U.S. fleet, with a power capacity of 300 megawatts or less – which could power more than 200,000 U.S. households. As such, SMRs could revitalize nuclear as a vital power source needed for the rise of artificial intelligence, electric vehicles, and manufacturing. GE Vernova’s SMR is called the BWRX-300. And compared to a larger nuclear plant, it has fewer components, less concrete, and less steel. BWRX-300’s smaller size allows it to be put in more locations. Here’s why GE Vernova’s nuclear venture is so important: In many respects, nuclear power has no equal, especially when it comes to powering data centers. Because of nuclear’s unique virtues, and the compelling economics it promotes, leading data center operators are becoming leading nuclear power investors. “Everything old is new again,” 18 th century author Jonathan Swift said. And the nuclear energy industry lends truth to that saying. So, in today’s Smart Money , let’s take a look at nuclear energy’s history... And then I’ll share one specific way you can capitalize on its future. A Look Into the Past Throughout the 1960s and ’70s, nuclear energy in the United States enjoyed a Golden Age. Power plants sprouted up across the country to provide reliable, “pollution-free” energy. But the Golden Age started to lose its luster in the late 1970s, as public sentiment turned against the radioactive power source and attempted to halt its nationwide expansion. Then, in March 1979, a reactor at the Three Mile Island facility in Pennsylvania suffered a partial meltdown. Although the accident did not cause any fatalities, it dealt a fatal blow to the industry. Seven years after Three Mile Island, the Soviet Union’s horrific nuclear catastrophe at Chernobyl terrified the world. And it seemed to guarantee that nuclear power would never make a comeback in the United States. Yet, despite that monumental setback, nuclear power’s public image eventually started to improve, bit by bit. Its image first started to improve when the term “climate change” entered the global lexicon. When that term appeared, it introduced the environmental equivalent of the classic 1960s self-help book I’m OK – You’re OK . This relativistic attitude asserted that no source of power generation is all bad, nor all good. Each has its strengths and weaknesses. For its part, nuclear energy has the unique strength of providing continuous baseload power, while not fouling the air or spewing CO 2 emissions. Because nuclear power still satisfies about 19% of electricity demand in the U.S., its contribution to clean air is roughly equivalent to removing 100 million cars from the nation’s highways. Moreover, although nuclear reactors produce radioactive waste, they don’t emit a molecule of those toxins into the air. This singular virtue cast a favorable, new light on nuclear power and helped it reclaim a shred of respectability. But old attitudes die hard. The world was not yet ready to welcome home this prodigal power source with open arms. Then AI arrived. And it immediately cleared a seat at the energy table for nuclear power... The AI-Sparked Nuclear Revival AI demands such spectacular volumes of electric power that existing sources are not able to provide. During the last three years alone, the combined electricity consumption of Amazon.com Inc. ( AMZN ) , Meta Platforms Inc. ( META ) , Microsoft Corp. ( MSFT ) , and Alphabet Inc. ( GOOGL ) soared more than 80%. That explosive growth is certain to continue. So, like GE Vernova, these tech giants “rediscovered” nuclear power as an ideal energy source. In October, Amazon announced that Amazon Web Services (AWS) – its cloud computing platform – is set to invest more than $500 million in nuclear power. AWS has signed an agreement with Dominion Energy Inc. ( D ) , Virginia’s top utility company, to explore the development of an SMR near Dominion’s North Anna Nuclear Generating Station (located about halfway between Washington, D.C., and Richmond). Around the same time, Google announced it will purchase power from Kairos Power, a small modular reactors developer. And in September, Microsoft made a deal with Constellation Energy Corp. ( CEG ) to restart a reactor at the infamous Three Mile Island nuclear facility. As the tech giants need to feed their growing appetite for electric power, they are investing directly in nuclear power. And this is where the profit opportunity comes in. This new high-profile demand for nuclear power from the tech industry could accelerate the uranium industry’s growth and profitability. So, to capitalize on that potential, I recommend investing in the uranium market. In fact, I recently recommended a unique energy play to my Fry’s Investment Report members that stands to benefit directly from the growth of AI technologies. To learn more about this uranium recommendation – and how to become a member of Fry’s Investment Report – click here. Regards, Eric Fry

One of the highlights of the event was the interactive demo classes conducted by Yuanwai International High School teachers, showcasing the school's dynamic and engaging teaching methods. Students and parents alike were impressed by the hands-on learning experiences and the personalized attention given to each student.Sheduer Sanders takes exception to dangerous late hit on him: 'I just don't know how that's legal'

Texas Board of Education passes Bluebonnet Learning curriculumRevolutionizing India’s Retail Fashion India's startup landscape is buzzing with innovation, reshaping industries and consumer experiences alike. In an exclusive conversation with The Hans India, Udit Mayor, Co-Founder of The Sock Street, discusses how evolving consumer trends, technology, and sustainability are shaping their approach to creating a modern D2C brand that aligns with India’s dynamic retail and fashion landscape. 1.⁠ ⁠The startup ecosystem in India is rapidly evolving. What inspired you to start the company, and what role do you see startups playing in shaping India's retail and fashion industry? I have been doing exports in the industry for the past 20 years. I felt that over time, Indian consumers have evolved and are now more experimenting type, they know how to look different from others, and they don’t hesitate to go extreme. This gave me an idea of why not start a D2C company and join in this mission. 2.⁠ ⁠Technology has become a core enabler for startups in every sector. How do you leverage technology to create unique products and enhance the customer experience in the sock and fashion space? True, Technology, when mixed with human intuition and gut feel, results in an unmatched performance. We use technology to fine-tune and convert our thoughts into a finished product. From designing on paper to fine-tuning it on illustrative software, sourcing material & quality checks by hand, to balancing the supply chain through technology, at every step, there is coordination between a human & machine, which produces the finest socks. 3.⁠ ⁠What challenges do you think startups in the fashion retail industry face when scaling in India? Ohh, many Indian consumer now prefers to shop online because of ease at every step, but the sad part is, most of it is an impulse buy, the icing on the cake is COD, you see a product you like, and you placed an order on COD, and then you forgot, or realise that Opps you don’t need it, and you choose not to take the order. What happens is the company has invested some amount to get that product delivered to your doorstep and now will invest again to get that product back. So, instead of making a sale, the company makes a loss. While there are many, this (RTO) is the biggest one. 4.⁠ ⁠With increasing consciousness around sustainability, how do you see balancing fashion, technology, and eco-friendly practices? I believe if you are true about the product, then you will follow the right path, for instances: we have launched 100% Bamboo fiber socks that are 100% natural and eco-friendly, and while others will say that their bamboo socks are 5X softer than cotton, we feel proud in saying that our socks are 3X softer than their bamboo, just because ours is pure bamboo. Even our cotton is 100% combed cotton; we don’t use polyester in any of our products here. 5.⁠ ⁠India’s growing youth population is increasingly becoming a market driver for innovative brands. How is "The Sock Street" aligning with this trend, and what role do you believe startups like yours play in building the 'New Bharat'? See, India is a growing economy, which also means that youths now have higher disposable income at hand, while their buying behaviour is contrary to their previous generations, for instance, our fathers won’t pay attention to what socks to wear on what shoes on what dress, but the young India understands the importance & impact that it brings into your perception. We at The Sock Street aim to provide unmatched comfort while elevating the look for this running India. We have got you covered every time, from Gym in the morning to Office meetings, from running on track to attending a bachelor party, from going on family trips to hitting the target in the office. We have socks for all moods and occasions.

‘I put hot sauce on my knees’ – Inside Giannis Antetokounmpo’s one-of-a-kind pregame routine

OTTAWA - Peter Anholt tried to keep things light as he emerged from one of the elevators at Canada's hotel. Read this article for free: Already have an account? As we navigate through unprecedented times, our journalists are working harder than ever to bring you the latest local updates to keep you safe and informed. Now, more than ever, we need your support. Starting at $14.99 plus taxes every four weeks you can access your Brandon Sun online and full access to all content as it appears on our website. or call circulation directly at (204) 727-0527. Your pledge helps to ensure we provide the news that matters most to your community! OTTAWA - Peter Anholt tried to keep things light as he emerged from one of the elevators at Canada's hotel. Read unlimited articles for free today: Already have an account? OTTAWA – Peter Anholt tried to keep things light as he emerged from one of the elevators at Canada’s hotel. The temperature had been turned way up on the veteran hockey executive and the country’s under-20 program after a stunning upset some 12 hours earlier. “You only want to talk to me when things are bad, eh?” Anholt joked to reporters Saturday morning. Canada head coach Dave Cameron speaks to his players during third period IIHF World Junior Hockey Championship preliminary round action against Latvia in Ottawa on Friday, Dec. 27, 2024. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick “Is that how this works?” That is indeed what happens when a powerhouse with a record 20 gold medals expected to roll over an opponent suffers one of its worst all-time defeats at the tournament. Canada was embarrassed on home soil 3-2 by Latvia — a country it had thumped by a combined 41-4 score across four previous meetings — in a shocking shootout Friday. Coming off a disastrous fifth-place finish last year in Sweden and having talked a lot about upping their compete level and preparation, the Canadians looked disjointed for long stretches against the plucky, hard-working Latvians. The power play finally clicked late in the third period, but stands at 1-for-7 through two games, while the top line of Easton Cowan, Calum Ritchie and Bradly Nadeau has yet to translate its pre-tournament chemistry into success in the spotlight. “We’re certainly trying to problem solve, but not throw the baby out with the bath water,” said Anholt, who heads the world junior setup. “We’ve got to be really careful.” Canada, which picked up a solid 4-0 victory over Finland to open its tournament Thursday, had plenty of offensive zone time and directed 57 shots at Latvian goaltender Linards Feldbergs. Included in that total, however, were far too many one-and-done efforts from the perimeter with little traffic in front. There were, of course, desperate spurts — especially late in regulation and in 3-on-3 overtime — but not nearly enough for a roster peppered with first-round NHL draft picks and top prospects. “We played really, really hard,” Anholt said in defending his players. “We controlled the puck lots. We created some chances. Their goalie was really good and they defended really good ... 99 times out of 100 we win that game.” Hoping for a big response Sunday against Germany before meeting the United States on New Year’s Eve to tie a bow on round-robin action in Group A, Canada will have to push ahead minus one of its best players. Star defenceman Matthew Schaefer was injured Friday and is done for the tournament after he slammed into Latvia’s net and skated off favouring his left shoulder area. “Tough blow for the kid,” Anholt said. “The way he plays the game, he plays it at such a high speed.” Cowan, a Toronto Maple Leafs first-round selection, said Canada remains confident despite Friday’s ugly result in the nation’s capital. “We’re good,” said the 19-year-old from Mount Brydges, Ont. “Everyone’s lost a hockey game before.” But not like that — or to that opponent on that stage. “Bit of a (crappy) feeling,” said Nadeau, a Carolina Hurricanes prospect from St-Francois-de-Madawaska, N.B. “We all know what this group is capable of. Losing that game is not our standard. “We’ll bounce back.” Some corners of social media exploded following the Latvian debacle, with heavy criticism directed at head coach Dave Cameron and the team’s overall roster construction. “We’re not really worried about it,” defenceman and Ottawa native Oliver Book, who like Cowan is back from last year’s team, said of the outside noise. “We know we didn’t play well.” Canada appears poised to mix things up against the Germans. Vancouver Canucks prospect Sawyer Mynio of Kamloops, B.C., is set draw in for Schaefer, while Anholt indicated there’s a good chance forward Carson Rehkopf will get his first crack at the 2025 tournament as a returnee. The 19-year-old Seattle Kraken second-round pick from Vaughan, Ont., has scored a combined 78 goals over his last 97 regular-season and playoff games in the Ontario Hockey League. “Great player,” Cowan said. “He finds ways.” Anholt said taking a big-picture approach is key in challenging moments. “Let’s not panic,” he said. “The world hasn’t fallen in. It’s hard, but we’ll learn from it.” It’s something Canada will have to do under intense scrutiny. “People are gonna love you and people are gonna hate you,” said Cowan, who has a goal an assist through two games. “Gotta keep doing you.” Anholt, who was also at the helm 12 months ago when Canada never got in gear, isn’t getting 2024 vibes from this year’s group. “Not even in any way, shape or form,” he said. “We’ve just got to take care of business.” They get a first shot at redemption Sunday. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Dec. 28, 2024. Advertisement AdvertisementQUESTION: Is it true that all the planets will line up in January 2025? ANSWER: Yes, you heard that right. It is called the Celestial Symphony, a rare planetary alignment on Jan. 25. The orbits of the planets will bring them into a rough line as seen from the Sun. The planets will be lined up in one row like diamonds scattered across the sky. As you gaze towards the night sky, you will see the planets of Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn, forming a mesmerizing line to view from the Earth. Venus and Jupiter will be the brightest, and Mars will display a reddish hue. Additionally, Saturn will add a touch of magic to the night sky. There will be six planets visible this time around, including Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Neptune and Uranus. The planets will be visible in the days leading up to Jan. 21, and for about four weeks afterward. Mars, Venus, Jupiter and Saturn will be visible to the naked eye. You'll need a telescope to spot Uranus and Neptune. In general, the best time to view the planet parade will be after Jan. 21, and before Feb. 21. The very best nights will be the week of Jan. 29 during the New Moon. The optimum time is from sunset to around 8:30 p.m. People can view the spectacle by looking south and then scanning the sky from left to right (east to west) to spot each planet. The alignment around that Jan. 25 date is no mere coincidence of wandering stars. Such cosmic choreographies have been observed and marveled at since ancient times, often sparking myths and prophecies. This alignment brings together key planets and constellations in a way that can only be described as magical. One astronomer said, "While the event doesn't cause the planets themselves to physically move in one plane, it creates the perception of a straight line from Earth's vantage point, a once-in-a-lifetime vista that will feel as if the universe itself is holding its breath." Do not expect any dire consequences, just a nice celestial show. The Jupiter Effect was a 1974 book by John Gribbin and Stephen Plagemann, in which the authors predicted that a March 10, 1982, alignment of the planets of the solar system would create a number of catastrophes, including a great earthquake on the San Andreas Fault. The book became a bestseller. The predicted catastrophes did not occur. Remember the Y2K, Year 2000, problem. In the years leading up to the turn of the millennium, the public gradually became aware of the "Y2K scare", and individual companies predicted the global damage caused by computer anomalies would require anything between $400 million and $600 billion to rectify. Many computer programs represented four-digit years with only the final two digits, making the year 2000 indistinguishable from 1900.Computer systems' inability to distinguish dates correctly had the potential to bring down worldwide infrastructures for computer reliant industries. A lack of clarity regarding the potential dangers of the computer glitch led some people to stock up on food, water, and firearms, purchase backup generators, and withdraw large sums of money in anticipation of a computer-induced apocalypse. Companies and organizations in some countries had checked, fixed, and upgraded their computer systems to address the problem. Few errors occurred. The scare was for nothing. Sources: astronomy magazine, celestial dispatches.com Larry Scheckel taught science at Tomah High School for 38 years and was named Tomah Teacher of the Year three times. Send comments and questions to lscheckel@charter.net .The Fredd Wigg social housing tower block in east London (Picture: Guy Smallman) Imagine living for years in a council block full of ­leaking pipes, faulty heating and damp‐walled flats. The council had long promised to regenerate your block, but then axed the plans due to the “challenging economic climate”. That’s exactly what residents in the Fred Wigg social housing tower block in Waltham Forest, east London, are forced to deal with. It’s also affect residents of the neighboring John Walsh tower. It is the story of council housing all across Britain, much of it is ­falling into despair with councils failing to listen to residents. The Labour-run Waltham Forest council is now refurbishing the block, but it is ignoring its tenants and ploughing ahead with changes that don’t address the issues residents face. Resident Sam told Socialist Worker about the conditions he’s faced over the last five years. “I couldn’t flush my toilet for a year, and I have no light in the kitchen. I asked the council about it and three times it sent someone. “But every time they come, make a note, leave and don’t actually fix the issue. I actually had to get solicitors involved.” Sam pointed to a pipe just outside his flat. “That’s been leaking for two years. You can smell it from in here—it’s attached to the upstairs flat’s toilet. I sent a message to the owner over a year ago, but they just asked me to move the rubbish outside my door. It’s a joke.” The conditions have a big impact on residents’ health and wellbeing. “I was also told that Waltham Forest council doesn’t clean windows, but I’m on the 13th floor and I actually can’t see out of my windows anymore,” said Sam. “That’s not good for your mental health. It’s very hard to invite people over here—sometimes people are even worried about entering the block.” Sam also said there was a huge issue with dust. “It’s difficult to breathe in here. Plus, my bathroom air vent hasn’t been cleaned in years so I had to tape it up to stop the dust coming out of it. I went away for a few days, came back and everything was covered in dust.” “Now the refurbishment has started, there’s so much dust in here. I can feel it in my mouth.” The council began this current refurbishment project earlier this year, but it had previously stated it would demolish and regenerate the building. Saria, a resident for over a decade, explained. “The council wanted to ­regenerate the building in 2013, but it had to stop because the plans used ACM cladding.” This is the highly flammable cladding that was used on the Grenfell tower block that erupted into flames in 2017, killing 72 people. “The redesign didn’t go through because one contractor wanted more money. Residents wanted bathrooms, kitchens and outstanding repairs. That’s all we wanted. “But the council totally disregarded us and wanted to do different work—that involved a new heating system that currently does not work.” And during Covid, “The council said it had run out of budget so it just didn’t do anything.” Saria continued, “There were loads of questions unanswered about the whole process. There were no ­meetings to explain what was going on and ­communication was non-existent.” Rather than addressing the tenants’ concerns over heating, bathrooms and kitchens, the council made the decision to remove all the cladding from the outer walls over fire safety. Saria said, “The fire brigade said the council needed to install new alarms. But they aren’t even turned on right now, and the sprinkler system isn’t working. The council just decided to take the panels off. “Contractors started taking the panels off in March, drilling the hell out of the building from 8am. When we complain, they just say they are allowed to drill at this time. “Now, the government can say whatever it wants, but we are the ones living in here. Listen to us.” Amir, who has lived at Fred Wigg for five years, said, “Right now, if I wake up, from 8am to 5pm, there’s just drilling in my ear, which is annoying, but you can’t avoid it.” Amir also noted how the council has failed to inform residents about its plans. “I don’t really know what they are doing—I just know they are replacing all the walls. They are now putting plasterboards up on our side, but on the other side I don’t know.” Saria said, “On 14 October they told us they were taking out the balcony walls. But there was nothing in any of the consultations about this. “Now the walls are taken out, people are getting cold. And the ­heating system residents are paying for doesn’t work—but the council is just not listening to us. Contractors were meant to send us a booklet to explain why and how, but we didn’t get that until two weeks after they started.” Saria slammed the council’s attitude towards its tenants. “The majority of people here are people of colour, and the treatment we are getting is, well, I can’t even say the word ­disrespectful, I can’t even find the word.” When contractors’ plans included removing the car park, Saria and others had to hold a protest. “The council and contractors then told residents that the tenants and residents association (TRA) stopped them from putting in new bathrooms and kitchens, which was a lie,” Saria added. It was an excuse so the council didn’t have to fix what tenants wanted. Saria said, “The council is acting like this to make it so uncomfortable that residents—quite a few who want to stay—will turn around and say ‘I want out’ because of the drilling, the cold, the leaks, all the problems. “When the next regeneration plans come, people will vote for it and people will move. It’s social cleansing.” “The council brought us here,” Amir said, “but we were only meant to stay here a year because the building was meant to be knocked down and the council said it would find us a different house. But that never happened.” Sam argued, “The council put us in this situation and it expects us to just brush it off because we aren’t clued up. It thinks we don’t know what’s going on. And the people that live here either come from a worse place so don’t feel like they can complain, or they are worried they will lose their home. “I want to change this place a lot. Not everyone wants to do that, but it’s important. In reality, most of the youth just want to get out of here.” Fred Wigg is part of a wider crisis in social housing. Councils continue to prioritise new builds, enabling the process of gentrification, instead of looking after social housing. Again and again councils’ attitude towards tenants in social housing is one of disregard and dismissal. And that, we already know, can lead to disaster . Some argue precarious workers are separate to the working class China is a rival, but also a trading partner Tariq Ali has published the second volume of his memoirs An interview with author Miriam Gold

Li Gangren, a well-known real estate tycoon, has seen his net worth rise by 5 million euros to a staggering 30 million euros. This increase can be attributed to his successful investments in prime locations in the heart of Paris, as well as his keen eye for development opportunities. Li Gangren's rise in net worth not only solidifies his position as one of the top players in the Paris real estate market but also showcases his shrewd business acumen and strategic thinking.Arne Slot hinted that Mohamed Salah and Liverpool could yet find a way to extend their relationship beyond the end of this season after the Egypt right winger scored twice, created another goal and hit the bar in the Premier League leaders’ 3-3 draw at Newcastle . It took the league’s leading scorer’s tally to nine in the past seven games and, in the aftermath of an utterly brilliant, game-changing second-half performance, Liverpool’s manager was fulsome in his praise for Salah. ”Every time we need Mo he scores a goal,” said Slot, as he answered questions regarding the potential outcome of Salah’s complicated contract extension negotiations with the Anfield board. “We are hoping and we expect he can continue this for a long time. He was outstanding in the second half, he did many special things for us. Mo had a massive impact. “It’s difficult to predict the future but Mo’s in an incredible place in a very good team that gives him opportunities at the moment and he’s able to do special things. He wasn’t playing his best game at first but then he did things not many players can do. He’s a special player. His finishing is so clinical. He leads by example and he trains so hard it is not surprising he does so well.” Not that the visiting manager was exactly content. “I’ve mixed feelings,” said Slot. “We were outstanding in the second half but not so good in the first half. Maybe 3-3 was the score the game deserved. In the first time we had problems with their intensity and aggressive pressing style. They forced us into too many first-half mistakes but in the second half it was difficult for them to repeat the intensity of the first 45 minutes. To go away to Newcastle is a difficult game, they have so much quality.” Newcastle’s manager Eddie Howe appeared relieved by a much-improved performance from his side, with the latterly out of sorts, Alexander Isak, inspirational at centre forward from where the Sweden striker scored one goal and created another for Anthony Gordon before Fabian Schär’s late equaliser. “Liverpool were the best team we’ve faced this season,” he said. “But it’s mixed emotions, I’m disappointed we haven’t won. It was Alex’s (Isak’s) best performance of the season. We need more of those. “But tonight we were everything we want to be, body language, pressing, attitude. We were more like ourselves. I thought Anthony (Gordon) was electric. But we need to hit those standards consistently.”As we reflect on the 20th anniversary of Tracy McGrady's historic performance, let us remember the magic and excitement that he brought to the game of basketball. His 35 seconds of brilliance will forever stand as a shining example of what is possible when talent, determination, and heart converge on the basketball court. Tracy McGrady's legacy will continue to inspire future generations of athletes and basketball fans, reminding us all of the enduring power of sports to captivate our hearts and minds. The "McGrady Moment" will live on in basketball lore, a true testament to the enduring legacy of one of the game's most electrifying talents.

Sequoia Financial Advisors LLC lessened its stake in Amazon.com, Inc. ( NASDAQ:AMZN ) by 0.1% during the 3rd quarter, according to its most recent disclosure with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The fund owned 1,100,273 shares of the e-commerce giant’s stock after selling 1,310 shares during the period. Amazon.com accounts for approximately 2.2% of Sequoia Financial Advisors LLC’s investment portfolio, making the stock its 7th largest holding. Sequoia Financial Advisors LLC’s holdings in Amazon.com were worth $205,014,000 at the end of the most recent reporting period. Several other hedge funds have also modified their holdings of AMZN. Vanguard Group Inc. raised its stake in shares of Amazon.com by 1.9% during the 1st quarter. Vanguard Group Inc. now owns 785,811,114 shares of the e-commerce giant’s stock worth $141,744,609,000 after acquiring an additional 14,724,687 shares in the last quarter. Swedbank AB purchased a new stake in shares of Amazon.com during the 1st quarter valued at $2,239,757,000. Capital World Investors boosted its position in shares of Amazon.com by 64.6% in the 1st quarter. Capital World Investors now owns 29,359,677 shares of the e-commerce giant’s stock worth $5,295,899,000 after purchasing an additional 11,524,463 shares in the last quarter. Capital Research Global Investors grew its stake in Amazon.com by 8.5% during the 1st quarter. Capital Research Global Investors now owns 86,982,857 shares of the e-commerce giant’s stock worth $15,689,968,000 after buying an additional 6,810,145 shares during the last quarter. Finally, Strategic Financial Concepts LLC increased its position in Amazon.com by 13,606.7% during the 2nd quarter. Strategic Financial Concepts LLC now owns 3,932,580 shares of the e-commerce giant’s stock valued at $759,971,000 after buying an additional 3,903,889 shares in the last quarter. 72.20% of the stock is owned by hedge funds and other institutional investors. Amazon.com Stock Down 0.6 % Shares of AMZN opened at $197.12 on Friday. The stock has a 50 day moving average price of $193.00 and a 200 day moving average price of $186.31. Amazon.com, Inc. has a one year low of $142.81 and a one year high of $215.90. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.21, a quick ratio of 0.87 and a current ratio of 1.09. The stock has a market capitalization of $2.07 trillion, a price-to-earnings ratio of 42.21, a PEG ratio of 1.33 and a beta of 1.14. Analysts Set New Price Targets AMZN has been the topic of several recent analyst reports. UBS Group upped their price objective on shares of Amazon.com from $220.00 to $223.00 and gave the company a “buy” rating in a report on Monday, October 28th. Truist Financial lifted their price objective on shares of Amazon.com from $265.00 to $270.00 and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a research note on Friday, November 1st. JPMorgan Chase & Co. upped their target price on Amazon.com from $230.00 to $250.00 and gave the company an “overweight” rating in a research report on Friday, November 1st. Piper Sandler raised their price objective on Amazon.com from $215.00 to $225.00 and gave the stock an “overweight” rating in a research note on Friday, November 1st. Finally, DA Davidson reiterated a “buy” rating and issued a $235.00 target price on shares of Amazon.com in a research report on Thursday, October 10th. Two investment analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating, forty have assigned a buy rating and one has issued a strong buy rating to the stock. Based on data from MarketBeat.com, Amazon.com presently has a consensus rating of “Moderate Buy” and a consensus target price of $235.77. Read Our Latest Analysis on AMZN Insider Activity at Amazon.com In other news, Director Daniel P. Huttenlocher sold 1,237 shares of the business’s stock in a transaction that occurred on Tuesday, November 19th. The stock was sold at an average price of $199.06, for a total transaction of $246,237.22. Following the transaction, the director now directly owns 24,912 shares in the company, valued at $4,958,982.72. The trade was a 4.73 % decrease in their position. The sale was disclosed in a document filed with the SEC, which is available at this hyperlink . Also, SVP David Zapolsky sold 2,190 shares of the stock in a transaction that occurred on Tuesday, September 24th. The shares were sold at an average price of $195.00, for a total value of $427,050.00. Following the completion of the sale, the senior vice president now directly owns 62,420 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $12,171,900. This represents a 3.39 % decrease in their position. The disclosure for this sale can be found here . In the last quarter, insiders sold 6,011,423 shares of company stock valued at $1,249,093,896. Corporate insiders own 10.80% of the company’s stock. Amazon.com Profile ( Free Report ) Amazon.com, Inc engages in the retail sale of consumer products, advertising, and subscriptions service through online and physical stores in North America and internationally. The company operates through three segments: North America, International, and Amazon Web Services (AWS). It also manufactures and sells electronic devices, including Kindle, Fire tablets, Fire TVs, Echo, Ring, Blink, and eero; and develops and produces media content. Featured Stories Five stocks we like better than Amazon.com The Risks of Owning Bonds Vertiv’s Cool Tech Makes Its Stock Red-Hot The 3 Best Retail Stocks to Shop for in August MarketBeat Week in Review – 11/18 – 11/22 Natural Gas Prices Continue To Rally, These Stocks Should Benefit 2 Finance Stocks With Competitive Advantages You Can’t Ignore Want to see what other hedge funds are holding AMZN? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for Amazon.com, Inc. ( NASDAQ:AMZN – Free Report ). Receive News & Ratings for Amazon.com Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Amazon.com and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .Under President Joe Biden, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has created a “diversity, equity and inclusion” (DEI) infrastructure of dizzying complexity. The agency’s 2025 budget request contains the word “equity” 829 times, adding onto a dollar total that is already impossible to fully tabulate. HHS employed at least 294 DEI staffers at a cost of $38.7 million last year, according to a new report from OpenTheBooks. There were 247 with salaries above $100,000. It can be difficult to grasp just how bureaucratic HHS’ DEI system truly is. The agency-wide “Office of EEO, Diversity & Inclusion” has 92 employees . Within that are seven more DEI offices for specific health agencies like the Food and Drug Administration. (RELATED: Biden’s Health Department Looks To Push Equity Requirements On Transplant Lists) Some of the smaller offices have several more divisions. The National Institutes of Health’s “Office of Equity, Diversity & Inclusion” has yet another “Diversity & Inclusion Division,” a marketing team, a customer outreach team and more. The DEI expenses do not stop there. The agency has $5 million budgeted for its “Office of Climate Change and Health Equity” and the “Office of Environmental Justice.” Another $5 million will go toward “diversifying the doula workforce.” The Health Resources and Services Administration received $102 million this year for “training for diversity.” A third of it is to help universities “enhance the academic performance of minorities.” The NIH plans to spend $241 million over nine years on its FIRST program, which pays universities to weigh a candidate’s “commitment to diversity” as equal to their academic ability when hiring scientists. Even the NIH’s $1.2 billion “Brain Research Through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnology” program now has an “emphasis on diversity and inclusion in the research community,” according to its budget request. Background: DEI has also transformed HHS’ seven Offices of Minority Health, which have 207 employees earning $29.4 million in total. Add that to the $38.7 million from the general DEI staff at HHS, and pay is $68 million. The Offices of Minority Health have existed since 1985, but once Biden took office, he directed them to focus on “addressing historical and contemporary injustices.” Quickly, the Center for Disease Control’s Office of Minority Health renamed itself to the Office of Health Equity and “declared racism a serious public health threat.” Critical quote: “In medical research, lives depend on putting excellence first. The NIH distorts that value, subordinating it to political ideology and endangering those it’s supposed to serve,” National Association of Scholars fellow John Sailer wrote in the Wall Street Journal. Political agendas from the left or the right have no place in science and medicine. This article was republished with permission through RealClearPolitics Wire. Jeremy Portnoy is an investigative journalist at OpenTheBooks. The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not reflect the official position of the Daily Caller News Foundation. All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org .