kijiji edmonton area
SATURDAY'S BOWL GAMES
CrowdStrike (NASDAQ:CRWD) Beats Q3 Sales TargetsI’m a decluttering pro – the 9 items to get rid from your home before 2025 as they bring negative energy
Global Market Forecast Predicts an Increase in Kids Sports Injury Treatment to $5.92 billion in 2024 With a CAGR Of 6.7%
Three things you should always pack in hand luggage according to flight crew and they’re all under £3XRAY Investors Have Opportunity to Lead Dentsply Sirona Inc. Securities Fraud Lawsuit
Google has unveiled Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking, an experimental AI model that represents a significant advancement in reasoning and operational transparency. This innovative model introduces a feature called “ ” reasoning, allowing users to follow its step-by-step decision-making process. By supporting multimodal inputs, including text and images, Gemini 2.0 is designed for a wide range of users, from developers to non-technical audiences. It is freely accessible through AI Studio, making sure widespread availability without financial barriers. Have you ever wondered how artificial intelligence actually “thinks”? AI decisions can often feel like a black box, making it hard to connect with the reasoning behind them. But what if you could see the step-by-step logic leading to an AI’s conclusions? That’s what Google’s latest innovation, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking, aims to deliver. By introducing Chain of Thought reasoning, this experimental model not only but also explains its process—like having a conversation with a smart friend who walks you through their reasoning. What makes Gemini 2.0 even more exciting is its versatility. It’s free to use through AI Studio, supports both text and image inputs, and even corrects itself when it makes mistakes. In a world where AI often feels out of reach or overly technical, Gemini 2.0 stands out as a transparent and approachable tool. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking introduces advanced “Chain of Thought” reasoning, allowing step-by-step transparency in decision-making and logical analysis. The model supports multimodal inputs (text and images), making it versatile for both technical and non-technical users across various applications. Key innovations include an expanded context window (up to 32,000 tokens), self-correction mechanisms, and transparent reasoning for enhanced trust and usability. Real-world applications span education, healthcare, creative industries, and more, with potential future expansions to include audio and video modalities. Freely accessible via AI Studio, Gemini 2.0 encourages community feedback to refine its capabilities and align with user needs. Gemini 2.0 stands out due to its focus on logical reasoning and transparency, offering a range of advanced features that enhance its functionality and usability. These include: The ability to process both text and images expands its potential applications across various fields. It excels in logical analysis and iterative problem-solving, delivering precise and reliable outputs. The model dynamically refines its responses during the reasoning process, making sure improved accuracy over time. These features collectively position Gemini 2.0 as a powerful tool, surpassing earlier AI models and offering a competitive alternative to other systems, such as OpenAI’s 01 preview. Gemini 2.0 is designed to address tasks that require complex reasoning, making it highly versatile across a range of real-world scenarios. Its practical applications include: It can solve puzzles, analyze hypothetical scenarios, and provide well-reasoned solutions. The model identifies patterns, interprets visual data, and draws logical conclusions from images. By adapting its approach based on feedback or new data, it continuously improves its performance. This adaptability ensures that Gemini 2.0 is valuable for both technical professionals and everyday users, whether for professional projects, educational purposes, or casual problem-solving. Here are additional guides from our expansive article library that you may find useful on Google Gemini AI. Gemini 2.0 integrates innovative research and development from DeepMind, incorporating advanced techniques to enhance its reasoning and usability. Some of the key technical innovations include: With the ability to process up to 32,000 tokens, the model can handle lengthy and complex interactions without losing coherence. Seamless integration with APIs enables its use in both text-based and image-based tasks, broadening its utility. Users can trace the logic behind the model’s conclusions, fostering trust and a deeper understanding of its decision-making process. These advancements make Gemini 2.0 not only a powerful AI tool but also one that is accessible and user-friendly, bridging the gap between advanced research and practical applications. One of the most new aspects of Gemini 2.0 is its ability to process multimodal inputs, such as combining text and images for cross-modal reasoning. This capability opens up new possibilities in various fields, including: Enhancing learning experiences by allowing interactive problem-solving and visual-textual integration. Assisting in diagnostic reasoning by analyzing medical images alongside patient data for more informed conclusions. Supporting design, storytelling, and content creation by seamlessly integrating visual and textual elements. Looking ahead, Google has hinted at the potential expansion of the Gemini series with “Pro” and “Ultra” versions. These future iterations may incorporate additional modalities, such as audio and video, further broadening the model’s capabilities. User feedback will play a crucial role in shaping these developments, making sure that the model evolves to meet real-world needs effectively. Gemini 2.0 is freely available through AI Studio, making it accessible to a wide audience without subscription fees or hidden costs. Google actively encourages users to provide feedback on the model’s performance, fostering a collaborative approach to its development. By involving the community, Google aims to refine Gemini 2.0 and align its capabilities with practical applications and user expectations. This open-access approach not only provide widespread access tos advanced AI technology but also ensures that the model continues to evolve based on real-world use cases and insights from a diverse range of users. Media Credit:Bay Shore house fire sends two residents to the hospital with smoke inhalation
None
Boeing is resuming production of its bestselling plane, the 737 Max, for the first time since 33,000 workers began a seven-week strike that ended in early November. The company said Tuesday that plane-building resumed at its plant in Renton, Washington, after going through a process of training workers and identifying and fixing potential problems. Boeing shares rose 4.5%, their best single-day percentage gain in nearly four months. Production and deliveries of Max jets and another airline plane, the 787 Dreamliner, have been stopped several times in recent years to fix manufacturing flaws. “Our team has worked methodically to restart factory operations in the Pacific Northwest. We have now resumed 737 production in our Renton factory, with our Everett (Washington) programs on plan to follow in the days ahead," the company said in a statement. Boeing builds its 777 and 767 jets in Everett, north of Seattle. Separately, the company said it took orders for 49 planes in November but lost an order by U.K. carrier TUI for 14 Max jets. It delivered 13 planes, down from 56 a year earlier. Ever since a panel called a door plug blew off a Max operated by Alaska Airlines in January, the Federal Aviation Administration has capped Boeing’s production of Max jets to 38 per month. Boeing hopes to convince regulators that it has corrected quality and safety issues and can raise that number to 56 planes per month. Boeing has been losing money since 2019, after two Max jets crashed, killing 346 people. It needs the cash it earns from delivering new planes to begin digging out of a deep financial hole . New CEO Kelly Ortberg has announced plans to lay off about 17,000 workers and sell new stock to raise cash and prevent the company’s credit rating from sliding into junk status.
The incoming Republican administration of Donald Trump has threatened to impose a 25 per cent tariff on all products from Canada and Mexico on the first day of his presidency — Jan. 20, 2025. Canada says it will continue to work with the United States on trade issues while Mexico has hinted at retaliation . The tariffs would be devastating to both the Canadian and Mexican economies, which depend heavily on trade with the U.S. for their economic well-being. The two targeted governments would in fact be forced to respond with retaliatory tariffs targeting American goods, creating economic carnage in all three countries. Would these tariffs be legal? “Are these tariffs legal?” is a natural question to ask. Simply put, no. In a typically hyperbolic, randomly capitalized post on his Truth Social platform, Trump writes that he will impose “a 25% Tariff on ALL products coming into the United States, and its ridiculous Open Borders. This Tariff will remain in effect until such time as Drugs, in particular Fentanyl, and all Illegal Aliens stop this Invasion of our Country!” The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) replacement that Canada, Mexico and the United States negotiated — under American duress six years ago — contains a clause stipulating that the deal doesn’t stop any of the three countries “from applying measures that it considers necessary for ... the protection of its own essential security interests.” But any attempt to invoke that clause would be so obviously a pretext that it’s laughable. As economist Paul Krugman notes , the U.S. Department of Commerce’s rules don’t allow for the clause to be used to coerce other countries into action; the tariffs have to be linked to an effect on a particular industry. So, no. The tariffs would not be legal. But the question itself is completely beside the point. It assumes that the North American relationship continues to be rooted in the rule of law and democratic norms that have underwritten North American politics for more than 80 years. Five years ago, the question would have made sense. Now, it’s the wrong question to ask. Shattered relationship In his first term, Trump repeatedly threatened tariffs (including the absurd assertion that Canadian aluminum imports represented a national security threat ) to browbeat Canada and Mexico on trade and immigration. Back then, we could still imagine that Trumpism was an aberration. Canada acted appropriately for the time. Threatened with tariffs, Canadian officials responded in kind . Read more: Trump tariffs: What the president-elect's rhetoric tells us about how Canada could be affected — again From this perspective, the lesson today for Canada seems clear: don’t panic, don’t be afraid to target vulnerable and politically important American industries and figure out what will make Trump happy. This approach might work in the short run. But it only makes sense in a specific context. In 2016, it was possible to hope that Trumpism would be fleeting, Democrats would return to power and equilibrium would be restored. The world can no longer make that assumption. Trumpism has been institutionalized in the Republican Party. Even if — and that’s assuming free and fair elections — the Democrats regain the White House in 2028, the two-party system in the U.S. means the Republicans will eventually regain power. Chronic, systemic instability in the U.S. is now the best the rest of the world can hope for. But it’s next to impossible to make solid plans on instability. Canada, for its part, can no longer rely on the rules and norms that have underpinned Canada-U.S. relations since the Second World War. Abandoning the rule of law As I’ve written previously , the United States-Mexico-Canada trade deal’s renegotiation clause, embraced by both Democrats and Republicans , deprives Canada and Mexico of the protection from coercion that trade agreements usually provide smaller countries. Such protection traditionally means the larger country cannot use access to its market (which Canada and Mexico depend upon) to force smaller countries to adopt their preferred policies. But the renegotiation clause of the current agreement keeps coercion on the table, moving North America away from a treaty-based rule-of-law approach to economic relations toward one focused more on raw power. Read more: Facing trade renegotiations, Canada can no longer count on free trade to protect it from U.S. power Trump’s bombastic threats turbo-charge the problem of institutionalized coercion. The trade deal may still be renegotiated as scheduled in 2026, but a treaty violated at will by one party is no treaty at all. Trump’s willingness to hold the Canadian and Mexican economies hostage for a deal on drug trafficking and migration also shatters another foundational norm. In a relationship as complex as Canada’s with the United States, there will always be problems. But these haven’t previously paralyzed the relationship because of a tacit commitment between both countries not to link unconnected issues, ensuring one party can’t strong-arm or blackmail the other. That norm provided Canada with significant protection from its much-larger neighbour. This norm, as well as formal trade rules, gave Canada a degree of autonomy in dealing with the U.S. Despite perennial problems like softwood lumber, it allowed the U.S. and Canada to come to reasonable arrangements supported by a commitment to domestic laws and international treaties. Few good options As the region’s dominant power, the U.S. can remake the broader North American relationship as it sees fit. This is the third American remaking of the continent in 40 years. The first was its embrace of a globalization-focused free-trade model in the late 1990s, resulting in NAFTA. Then, post-9/11, it unilaterally decided that border security, rather than continental economic integration , was its top priority. Post-2001, many pundits and analysts, fearful of what this new American focus on security would mean for Canada, claimed that Canada had no choice but to integrate more deeply with the U.S. in case the Americans, in the words of Canadian military historian Jack Granatstein , became “unhappy with us” and “bring our economy to a crashing halt.” In the end, these fears were overstated. The U.S. did not crash Canada’s economy once the Liberal government of the day opted against following it into Iraq or joining its Ballistic Missile Defence system, two of Granatstein’s imagined red lines. As I explored in my dissertation on the subject — eventually reworked in my book, Copyfight: The Global Politics of Digital Copyright Reform — Canada was protected by NAFTA and by shared norms regarding the non-linkage of unrelated issues, as well as the shared respect for the rule of law. Asset becomes a vulnerability Those arguing in favour of appeasement — that Canada must do whatever the U.S. wants to avoid retaliation — should not delude themselves that Canada would be integrating more deeply with a fellow democratic country, protected by shared norms and the rule of law. To integrate further with a country that has rejected the rule of law would be to surrender Canadian sovereignty. Deep integration with the U.S., once our greatest asset, is now Canada’s greatest vulnerability. Canada-U.S. relations experts know this relationship is fundamental to Canada’s prosperity and survival. Canada will find a way to manage this relationship because it has to. But it must do so within a context in which the question “is it legal?” no longer makes sense. Instead, the question confronting Canada is: “How can a liberal-democratic nation survive next to a much more powerful country with no respect for the rule of law?” The difference between these two questions is the distance between democracy and authoritarianism. It is here that Canada now finds itself.
Gordon Brown declares opposition to assisted dying lawSAN JOSE, Calif. , Nov. 26, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- Cisco (NASDAQ: CSCO) will host its 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders on Monday, December 9, 2024 , beginning at 8:00 a.m. PST via audio webcast. Participants will include Cisco Chair and CEO Chuck Robbins . What: 2024 Cisco Virtual Annual Meeting of Stockholders When: Monday, December 9, 2024, 8:00 a.m. PST Listen and Watch: A live audio (including closed captioning) webcast of the meeting with synchronized slides will be available online. Cisco stockholders of record as of October 10, 2024 , can vote and ask questions online during the meeting. Visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CSCO2024 to attend. Online Annual Report: View Cisco's 2024 Annual Report and Proxy at www.cisco.com/c/en/us/about/annual-reports.html Replay: A replay of the Annual Stockholder Meeting with synchronized slides will be available on the Cisco Investor Relations website at investor.cisco.com within 24 hours of the conclusion. About Cisco Cisco (NASDAQ: CSCO) is the worldwide technology leader that securely connects everything to make anything possible. Our purpose is to power an inclusive future for all by helping our customers reimagine their applications, power hybrid work, secure their enterprise, transform their infrastructure, and meet their sustainability goals. Discover more on The Newsroom and follow us on X at @Cisco . Cisco and the Cisco logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Cisco and/or its affiliates in the U.S. and other countries. A listing of Cisco's trademarks can be found at www.cisco.com/go/trademarks . Third-party trademarks mentioned are the property of their respective owners. The use of the word partner does not imply a partnership relationship between Cisco and any other company. Investor Relations Contact: Press Contact: Sami Badri Robyn Blum Cisco Cisco 469-420-4834 408-930-8548 sambadri@cisco.com rojenkin@cisco.com View original content to download multimedia: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/cisco-to-host-2024-virtual-annual-meeting-of-stockholders-302316943.html SOURCE Cisco Systems, Inc.
From Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie to Pope Francis: the books to look forward to in 2025