Juggernaut Marketing Wins the 2024 Quality Business Award for The Best Advertising Agency in Medford, Oregon 12-11-2024 11:50 PM CET | Business, Economy, Finances, Banking & Insurance Press release from: ABNewswire Medford, OR - December 11, 2024 - Juggernaut Marketing, a prominent marketing agency, has received the 2024 Quality Business Award for The Best Advertising Agency in Medford, Oregon. This accolade acknowledges Juggernaut Marketing for its exceptional customer service, high-quality services, and overall business performance. The Quality Business Awards annually acknowledges businesses exhibiting excellence within their industry. Selections are determined by taking into account their reputation, feedback from customers, and overall performance within their respective industries. Since 2019, Juggernaut Marketing has been a leading marketing agency in Medford, Oregon. Juggernaut Marketing is a full-service marketing agency that is focused on providing their clients with customized marketing solutions to best suit their needs and goals. The talented Juggernaut Marketing team consists of Founder and CEO Tyler Lake, Partner and SEO Director Tysan McClusky, and Partner and VP of Marketing Tyler Weist. Some of the many marketing services offered by Juggernaut Marketing include: marketing consulting; SEO (Search Engine Optimization); email marketing; Google Ads management; Facebook Ads management; social media campaigns; content creation; video marketing; Shopify store builds and management; and web design and development. The marketing services provided by Juggernaut Marketing help business grow a solid digital presence and achieve measurable results. Over the last five years, Juggernaut Marketing has helped over one thousand clients reach their business goals. Juggernaut Marketing also offer digital marketing ebook guides to help businesses grow on a variety of topics such as Google Ads Startup, Local Business SEO Starter, Branding and Visual Identity, and Google Business Profile Optimization. Juggernaut Marketing are proud to serve clients in Medford and the surrounding communities. When the time came to choose this year's recipient, Juggernaut Marketing emerged as a noteworthy company in the marketing sector. Their professional, experienced, and creative team is well-regarded within the Medford community, and positive reviews of Juggernaut Marketing are abundant. Here are a few of the numerous positive testimonials penned by satisfied clients who were thoroughly impressed with the communication and marketing services offered by Juggernaut Marketing. "We have been working with Juggernaut for a few years now. First with rebuilding our website. Over time that relationship has grown and now they are an integral part of our business. They handle SEO and weekly videos that we share on YouTube. They help see what puts us in the rankings to receive first page status on google searches. This has all helped us see a dramatic increase of applicants to our agent program. That increase in applicants is exactly what we were hoping to achieve." "Juggernaut has been a great company to work with. Tyler and Gordon have come up with many creative ideas for our dealership, making sure that we are not looking at just another car commercial. The communication and professionalism provided have been nothing short of top-tier." "Tyler and Sebastian were absolutely amazing to work with. We hired them to rebuild our entire website and it is the best decision we made. Tyler was very up front about time lines, communicated regularly, and explained every process simply enough for us to understand. We now have them manage the website and any time we have changes or updates, they are very prompt in taking care of everything." "The Juggernaut team is the team you want if you want to get your name out there to customers! Throughout working with them they are prepared for everything. Plus they put on a the best 4 person scramble tournament that supports Hearts With a Mission in Southern Oregon. Love this company!" The entire Juggernaut Marketing team consistently exceed expectations to deliver excellent marketing services for every client. The Quality Business Awards recognizes businesses achieving an average quality score of 95% or higher throughout the preceding year. To be eligible, a business must garner outstanding customer reviews from at least three different platforms. Those upholding sterling reputations and track records over multiple years with minimal complaints receive high scores. Moreover, businesses that consistently engage with and respond to customer feedback are held in high esteem. Additionally, adherence to integrity, community involvement, and proactive efforts to reduce environmental impact are important criteria. Receiving a Quality Business Award shows a dedication to delivering superior products and exceptional customer service. For more information about Juggernaut Marketing, please visit the company's website at [ www.gojuggernaut.com [ https://gojuggernaut.com/ ]]. Contact: Quality Business Awards support@qualitybusinessawards.com [mailto:support@qualitybusinessawards.com] Media Contact Company Name: Juggernaut Marketing Email:Send Email [ https://www.abnewswire.com/email_contact_us.php?pr=juggernaut-marketing-wins-the-2024-quality-business-award-for-the-best-advertising-agency-in-medford-oregon ] Phone: (541) 816.8114 Country: United States Website: https://gojuggernaut.com This release was published on openPR.
Mumbai, Nov 30 (IANS): Congress leader Bhai Jagtap has defended his controversial remarks about the Election Commission of India (ECI), which sparked a major political controversy. Jagtap, who referred to the ECI as 'dog' of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, has refused to back down, asserting "his statement reflects the sentiments of crores of people". Backing his remarks, Jagtap -- a member of the Maharashtra Legislative Council, told IANS: "I am firm on my statement. This is not just Bhai Jagtap’s statement, but the sentiments of crores of people." He accused the ECI of undermining democracy and creating confusion in voters' minds, particularly after the Maharashtra Assembly election results. "The Election Commission is supposed to strengthen our democracy, not cause doubts," Jagtap added, questioning why the ECI did not act on alleged violations such as BJP leader Ram Shinde's comments on "involvement of money in the electoral process". He also raised concerns over the ECI's decision to erase Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) data and conduct mock polling, urging the poll body to address these issues. Bhai Jagtap also responded to Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge's remarks at the Congress Working Committee meeting about the party's 'below-expectation' performance, wherein Kharge questioned the over-reliance on national leaders and urged party workers to focus more on local issues. Jagtap agreed with Kharge, saying: "What he said is true. Every political party needs to evaluate itself for improvement. If both Kharge and Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi feel this way, it’s important that we address our weaknesses." On the Board of Control for Cricket in India's (BCCI) decision not to play in Pakistan in the upcoming Champions Trophy, Jagtap, a "former cricketer" himself, insisted that sports should not be politicised. "It's a BCCI decision, and they know best about it."Former Cy Young winner Shane Bieber returning to Cleveland Guardians on 1-year deal, AP source saysNone
Opinion editor’s note: Strib Voices publishes a mix of guest commentaries online and in print each day. To contribute, click here . ••• You can learn something about a city by just walking through it. Most of New York City’s Manhattan core feels bustling, whereas a San Francisco block can seem dormant. In Rome, it is common to see groups of men standing around, chatting or arguing. We are all familiar with such casual generalizations, but what might the data show more explicitly? Fortunately, there is new research. We have entered the age where innovative methods of measurement, such as computer vision and deep learning, can reveal how American life has changed. Researchers at the National Bureau of Economic Research compiled footage of four urban public spaces, two in New York and one each in Philadelphia and Boston, from 1979 to 1980 and again in 2008-2010. These snapshots of American life, roughly 30 years apart, reveal how changes in work and culture might have shaped the way people move and interact on the street. The videos capture people circulating in two busy Manhattan locations, in Bryant Park in midtown and outside the Metropolitan Museum of Art on the Upper East Side; around Boston’s Downtown Crossing shopping district; and on Chestnut Street in downtown Philadelphia. One piece of good news is that, at least when it comes to our street behavior, we don’t seem to have become more solitary. From 1980 to 2010 there was hardly any change in the share of pedestrians walking alone, rising from 67% to 68%. A bigger change is that average walking speed rose by 15%. So the pace of American life has accelerated, at least in public spaces in the Northeast. Most economists would predict such a result, since the growth in wages has increased the opportunity cost of just walking around. Better to have a quick stroll and get back to your work desk. The biggest change in behavior was that lingering fell dramatically. The amount of time spent just hanging out dropped by about half across the measured locations. Note that this was seen in places where crime rates have fallen, so this trend was unlikely to have resulted from fear of being mugged. Instead, Americans just don’t use public spaces as they used to. These places now tend to be for moving through, to get somewhere, rather than for enjoying life or hoping to meet other people. There was especially a shift at Boston’s Downtown Crossing. In 1980, 54% of the people there were lingering, whereas by 2010 that had fallen to 14%. Consistent with this observation, the number of public encounters also fell. You might be no less likely to set off with another person in tow, but you won’t meet up with others as often while you are underway. The notion of downtown as a “public square,” rife with spontaneous or planned encounters, is not what it used to be. The internet and mobile phones are likely driving this change in behavior. If there is someone you want to meet up with, it is today much easier to arrange that in advance, rather than hoping for chance encounters. Anecdotally, I have noticed that the notion of a “hangout” is less central to daily life than when I was growing up, though people will talk about “hanging out” on social media such as X or Bluesky. Another driver of change could be the aging of America. In the 1980s, when I was in my 20s, I sometimes would hang out at the Downtown Crossing area in Boston, but it is unlikely, if I still lived nearby, that I would do so today. As an older person, I am busier and have more preestablished social networks, including in other cities and online. I also find that more people in public spaces are on their cellphones, so what’s the point? American cities have devoted considerable attention to developing public spaces as a place to meet up and socialize. Some pedestrian-oriented spaces, such as New York City’s Times Square and downtown areas in Cleveland and Philadelphia, among others, are far more animated than they were three decades ago. But perhaps the emphasis on the public square is less appropriate than it used to be, and traffic management, in the broad sense of that term, should be the new priority. Should we prefer this new world to the old? There is probably no going back, but in the meantime I will be observing public spaces in a new and different way. I am more likely to see the velocity of movement and take stock of the social thinness of what is before me, and thus be all the more in a hurry to get to my next destination. Tyler Cowen is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist, a professor of economics at George Mason University and host of the Marginal Revolution blog.Nasdaq surges above 20,000 after US inflation data matches estimates
Jalen White runs for 125 yards and 3 TDs; Georgia Southern beats Appalachian St. 29-20
For the last few years, a younger generation of Republicans — including Vice President-elect J.D. Vance — has tried to convince their party to (partially) rethink its traditional kowtowing to corporate interests. If they really want to be the party of the working class, it might not be enough to pour contempt on and . What if they combined that with a genuine skepticism of corporate power, and a willingness to use government to police monopolies and make sure markets work for everyone? It was an interesting idea. But even if Vance and his allies were sincere — and there are plenty of reasons to doubt that — the incoming Trump White House is going in another direction. Big business will have than in his first, and the dream of a Republican Party that cares about voters’ pocketbooks, not just CEOs’ salaries, . The idea that this administration will be “populist” in any meaningful sense looks more like a joke every single day. Already, Trump has to fill out Cabinet posts and advisory positions. He is dining with industry lobbyists and promising regulatory exemptions to big companies. And on Tuesday, that he would replace Lina Khan, , as chair of the Federal Trade Commission.Under Khan, the FTC has been at the center of some of the most important action on markets and monopolies over the last four years. Along with Jonathan Kanter, head of the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division, Khan has reinvigorated antitrust enforcement, challenging giant mergers and bringing lawsuits against tech companies for their exploitative practices. While not all of Khan’s antitrust actions have been successful, she has notched some notable victories. Earlier this year, between grocery giants Kroger and Albertsons, arguing the merger would raise prices and hurt workers. After a judge sided with the FTC and state regulators, Albertsons backed out of the deal. Though , her adversarial relationship with large corporations, and particularly with the tech industry, won her some fans on the right. “I look at Lina Khan as one of the few people in the Biden administration that I think is doing a pretty good job,” earlier this year. Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., that her past criticism of Amazon was “precisely why she was a good choice for the FTC.” Hawley is just one Republican who has styled himself an anti-corporate crusader; he has to outlaw corporate political contributions, which he says would “hold Corporate America accountable for drowning out the voices of the American people.” Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., Trump's pick for secretary of state, once a union organizing drive at an Amazon facility, though only because he thought the company was too “woke” and should be punished. The support for Khan from these “Khanservatives,” and the forlorn hope that Trump’s “populism” has anything to do with economics, led some to wonder if Trump might actually let Khan stay on. The conservative Wall Street Journal editorial board In July that “Mr. Vance may lobby Mr. Trump to reappoint her in a second term.” Instead, Trump has picked FTC Commissioner Andrew Ferguson as her replacement. In announcing Ferguson on his Truth Social platform, Trump wrote that “Andrew has a proven record of standing up to Big Tech censorship.” But this hostility emerges only when Ferguson believes tech companies are censoring conservatives. He recently praised X owner Elon Musk, that the platform’s “current turn toward free expression is due only to its new owner’s unusually firm commitment to free and open debate.” In fact, Musk regularly his own critics on X and trying to quash speech he doesn’t like. Ferguson’s , , demonstrates that he will broadly reverse Khan’s robust antitrust enforcement. In the one-page document, he promises to “reverse Lina Khan’s anti-business agenda” by repealing “burdensome” regulations (i.e. regulations that businesses don’t like) and stopping “Lina Khan’s war on mergers.” And lest Big Tech gets too worried, he pledges to “end the FTC’s attempt to become an AI regulator.” No one should be surprised that conservative support for Khan and opposition to Big Tech was never about the dangers of monopoly power or the well being of consumers. Republicans only get mad at companies when they perceive a threat to their partisan interests. Likewise, they’ll condemn corporate “wokeness” when companies celebrate Pride Month, but they don’t care if those same companies jack up prices, mistreat workers or pollute communities. For all the Khanservatives' claim to be reimagining their party’s stance toward corporations, they lack any broader conception of how much power corporations should have, how government should ensure the proper functioning of markets, or what constitutes genuine competition in the public interest. They’re happy to have the FTC, and the government in general, revert to a reflexive view that corporations should be able to do pretty much whatever they want — so long as it’s conservative officials who are determining where the lines are. Now Vance and his allies’ claims to populism will be truly tested. Are the corporate-oriented officials running key agencies in the new Trump administration going to reverse the Biden administration’s efforts in taking on corporate power? What about the FTC’s recently finalized “ ” rule, which will require that canceling a subscription or gym membership is as easy as signing up in the first place? What about its on “junk fees,” or its ban on onerous ? Based on Trump’s actions since the election, all these moves could be at risk. It’s not just the FTC — we could see the Trump administration end the efforts to get for airline passengers that Biden started, or follow up on threats to neuter the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which protects consumers from financial industry scams and mistreatment (Elon Musk he wants to “delete” the CFPB). Here’s the real measure of the phoniness of the Republican claim to populism: As the next four years progress, watch how often the administration takes the side of consumers when they come in conflict with corporate interests. My bet is on “almost never.” Perhaps Vance was sincere all the times he said he wanted a genuinely populist Republican Party that is skeptical of corporate power. But that’s almost certainly not what we’re going to get. Conservative ideology, and subservience to the moneyed interests that fund the GOP, will determine what Republicans do when they take power, just as they always have.
Hegseth meets with moderate Sen. Collins as he lobbies for key votes in the SenateStock market today: Wall Street rises with Nvidia as bitcoin bursts above $99,000