Robinson Helicopter's Symmetrical Horizontal Stabilizer Now Approved for All Models by European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), Argentina, Japan, and India
Microsoft seized 240 domains belonging to ONNX, a phishing-as-a-service platform that enabled its customers to target companies and individuals since 2017. ONNX was the top adversary-in-the-middle (AitM) phishing service, according to Microsoft's "Digital Defense Report 2024," with a high volume of phishing messages during the first six months of this year. Millions of phishing emails targeted Microsoft 365 accounts each month, and Microsoft has apparently had enough. ONNX promoted and sold phishing kits on Telegram using a subscription service model, which ranged from $150 to $550 a month. "The fraudulent ONNX operation offered phishing kits designed to target a variety of companies across the technology sector, including Google, Dropbox, Rackspace, and Microsoft," Microsoft said in its statement. The attacks themselves are controlled through Telegram bots and come with built-in, two-factor authentication (2FA) bypass mechanisms . As of late, QR code phishing, also known as quishing, has also been enabled, targeting financial firms' employees. ONNX uses bulletproof hosting services that allow delays in phishing domain takedowns, as well as encrypted JavaScript code that decrypts itself, all of which allows them to be highly effective in carrying out attacks and evading detection. "While today's legal action will substantially hamper the fraudulent ONNX's operations, other providers will fill the void, and we expect threat actors will adapt their techniques in response," stated Steven Masada , assistant general counsel at Microsoft's Digital Crimes Unit. "However, taking action sends a strong message to those who choose to replicate our services to harm users online: we will proactively pursue remedies to protect our services and our customers and are continuously improving our technical and legal strategies to have greater impact." A full list of the 240 domains that were seized is available online. Dark Reading is a leading cybersecurity media site.( MENAFN - Robotics & automation News) Opinion: Will autonomous cars ever gain regulatory approval to operate freely on public roads? The news that General Motors has decided to fold cruise into its overall business should send shock waves through the industry. If Cruise can't do it, with all its money and giant parent's backing, who can? Cruise is a relatively new startup which had huge optimism around it because several billion dollars were invested into it and a lot of people still believe autonomous cars are the future of global road traffic. But after burning through $10 billion and only generating $500 million in revenue, Cruise seems to have lost its parent company's confidence and has now been absorbed into the historic automotive giant, with its technology being repackaged into GM production cars as, essentially, an advanced driver assistance system called“Super Cruise”. The imminent disappearance of a specialist autonomous car developer of such a size raises the question of whether the nascent autonomous car sector has any hope at all to become a sizeable market. Or whether a combination of regulatory hurdles, public apprehension and technological limitations will turn everything into the proverbial white elephant, with tens of billions invested and little to nothing in return. Autonomous vehicles represent a technological leap that had promised – and still promises – to revolutionise transportation. Its proponents are always keen to promote the potential to reduce accidents, improve traffic efficiency, and lower emissions. Despite unconvincing evidence for such claims, these vehicles are often heralded as the future of mobility. Yet, despite years of development and billions of dollars in investments, their widespread adoption remains uncertain – unless you're watching sci-fi films, in which case they are everywhere. The critical question is: Are autonomous cars safe enough to convince regulators and governments to allow them to operate freely on public roads? This article explores the safety, regulatory, and economic dimensions of this question, using examples from test programs around the globe and examining what the future holds for the industry. Over the past decade, autonomous vehicle technology has advanced significantly. Companies like Waymo, Tesla, and Baidu have made strides in areas such as lidar, AI-powered navigation, and vehicle-to-vehicle communication. For instance, Waymo has conducted extensive trials in Phoenix, Arizona, where its driverless taxis operate under controlled conditions. Similarly, Tesla's Full Self-Driving (FSD) system, while controversial, has amassed vast amounts of real-world driving data. Despite these advancements, challenges persist. Autonomous systems often struggle with so-called“edge cases” – rare but critical scenarios like erratic pedestrian behaviour or ambiguous road markings. Additionally, sensor reliability in adverse weather conditions, such as heavy rain or snow, remains a major hurdle. These limitations underline the gap between the promise of autonomous vehicles and their readiness for unrestricted use on public roads. Taken together, these technological limitations mean that fully autonomous vehicles on regular public roads are not going to happen in the foreseeable future. In 10-15 years maybe, possibly, but not anytime before that. But that's just our view. Regulators worldwide are cautious about allowing autonomous vehicles to operate freely. Safety is the foremost concern: any failure in an autonomous vehicle system could have catastrophic consequences. Governments and regulatory bodies demand near-zero failure rates, a standard that current technology emphatically has not met. Examples of regulatory roadblocks abound. In California, stringent testing requirements have slowed the implementation of autonomous vehicles, even for companies with significant technological prowess. In Europe, regulators have adopted a similarly cautious approach, emphasising strict compliance with safety standards and liability frameworks. Public perception also plays a significant role; incidents like the fatal Uber self-driving car crash in 2018 have prompted scepticism and heightened scrutiny. And with good reason. The fact is that, in completely new and unforeseen situations, an autonomous car cannot use its own judgment because it hasn't got any; and the data it has been trained on won't help because it doesn't contain any information about this new and novel situation because it may never have happened before or even have been imagined before. So, bridging the gap between current capabilities and regulatory expectations is a formidable task. Autonomous systems must achieve a level of reliability that matches or exceeds human drivers while addressing the unpredictability of human behaviour. Unfair though it may be, autonomous driving technology has got to surpass human drivers in many ways for it to convince the public. While advances in AI and machine learning show promise, they may never fully eliminate the edge cases that confound autonomous vehicles systems. Ethical dilemmas also complicate the path forward. Decision-making algorithms face scenarios akin to the classic trolley problem: should the car prioritise the safety of its passengers or pedestrians? Resolving these questions in a manner acceptable to regulators, insurers, and the public is crucial for autonomous vehicles to gain approval. And that is very unlikely in the near-term future. Yes, many autonomous vehicles are being operated on large, industrial sites or transport hubs where there are no pedestrians and far few obstacles, but the chaos of some public roads in the world would basically overload the circuits of a typical autonomous car – it just would not be able to cope. General Motors' decision to close Cruise highlights the immense challenges facing the industry. Despite years of development and significant investment, Cruise's progress was insufficient to justify continued funding. This move raises broader questions about the viability of autonomous vehicle companies. Other players in the field are adopting varied strategies. Waymo, for example, has pivoted toward partnerships with logistics and ride-hailing companies to create practical, revenue-generating applications for its technology. Meanwhile, Tesla continues to position its FSD system as a consumer-oriented product, albeit with significant controversy surrounding its safety claims. These differing approaches reflect the uncertainty and high stakes of the autonomous vehicle market. If autonomous vehicles were to gain regulatory approval, the market potential is immense. Estimates from McKinsey suggest that the global autonomous vehicles market could reach $1.6 trillion annually by 2030, encompassing ride-hailing, freight, and last-mile delivery. However, this growth depends on overcoming regulatory and technological hurdles, as well as public acceptance, none of which – as has been said repeatedly in this article but needs to be emphasised – has been done. Geographical differences also shape the market's outlook. Some analysts say that urban centres, with their dense populations and structured environments, are“more likely” to adopt autonomous vehicles than rural areas. They might point to countries like China, which have shown a willingness to rapidly implement emerging technologies, but we would argue that such an example is not appropriate. In fact, the opposite is more likely – there are fewer obstacles and complications on rural roads, desert roads and so on, so it stands to reason that autonomous cars will be better suited to such environments. Still, China might currently be leading the way, but that's because Chinese regulators are apparently not as strict in some ways as their counterparts in Europe and America. China still probably considers itself an emerging economy and may take risks that mature economies would not take in order to enable an apparently promising sector like autonomous vehicles to grow. That is a problem for many reasons, not least of which is that a less regulated environment may lead to faster refinement of the technology through trial and error – no matter how dangerous to humans that refinement process is. China, being the largest car market in the world, could incorporate autonomous cars into its public road system earlier than the West, which means that European and American car companies that are still developing autonomous cars should be able to get the returns on their investments over there. And then, maybe, eventually, sell in Europe and in America and the rest of the world. Regulatory caution in the US and Europe may slow progress in their respective regions, but that doesn't mean that they can't enter the market at a later stage. When Japanese watchmakers started producing cheap quartz watches in the 1960s and '70s, they nearly killed off the entire Swiss watchmaking industry. But the technological shift had to take place. Switzerland was essentially stuck in past, with unions and regulators preventing the modernisation of the watchmaking sector. But when quartz watches outsold mechanical watches for the first time in 1970, the Swiss watchmakers realised they had to change. Switzerland reorganised itself to adapt and is still the fourth-largest watchmaking nation in the world today . Similarly, when Japanese carmakers produced cheap, reliable cars that put European and American cars to shame because of their constant breaking down and so on – let's be honest – it forced Western carmakers to improve the product and that, in turn, led to maintaining a very large worldwide market share. At least half the car brands in any top 10 global list will be American or European car companies. The dream of autonomous vehicles operating freely on public roads remains elusive. In fact, for now, it could be argued that it's nothing but a pipe dream. Technological challenges, regulatory hurdles, and public scepticism form significant barriers that will take years, if not decades, to overcome. While we do believe that autonomous cars and vehicles will eventually outnumber human-driven cars on the road, that eventuality is more than a decade away – we'd say several decades but we don't want to depress everyone too much. Companies developing autonomous cars face tough decisions about whether to continue investing in this space or pivot to other opportunities, like GM has decided. While the market potential is vast, making money in it requires substantial breakthroughs in both technology and policy. As the industry navigates these complexities, one question looms large: Will autonomous vehicles ever be safe enough to earn the approval of the regulators and the trust of the public? Until that question is answered, the road to widespread adoption will remain a long and rocky one. MENAFN13122024005532012229ID1108992067 Legal Disclaimer: MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.
River Plate’s Monumental stadium is on track to host one of the 2030 World Cup’s Centenary Celebration Matches. FIFA, the world football governing body, published its analysis of the bids for the 2030 and 2034 World Cups on Friday and concluded that, while the stadium needs some work to host the game, it “appears to meet the majority of requirements.” The iconic stadium, the largest in Argentina by capacity, recently hosted the 2024 Copa Libertadores final, and it’s the runaway candidate to host Argentina’s Centenary Celebration Match. The games, set to take place in Argentina, Paraguay, and Uruguay, are a centenary celebration of the first World Cup in history, held in Uruguay in 1930. FIFA highlighted that the Monumental is“currently undergoing works to further modernize the stadium infrastructure and installations.” According to its report, the hybrid reinforcement, vacuum, and ventilation system installed on the natural grass pitch has made the playing surface “state-of-the-art.” But it’s not all good news. FIFA noted that River’s main stand is in the east, with only 12,000 seats in the stadium enjoying roof coverage. Thus, they require further study of “the impact of the sun position and inclement weather on the media and VIP tribunes.” The analysis also notes that “some spaces, such as the broadcast compound and hospitality villages, currently fall short of the requirements.” The federation insists it can cooperate with the club to ensure appropriate developments. “The refurbished stadium will provide an upgraded home for Club Atlético River Plate,” stated FIFA, ensuring “no legacy issues.” You may also be interested in: Botafogo wins first Libertadores in Argentina to crown South American football seasonRaw milk nearly killed her son. Now avian flu is bringing more attention to its risk
Trump team signs agreement to allow Justice to conduct background checks on nominees, staffShaheen gives mixed grades to Trump's top picks