7xm apk
Phoenix Real Estate Powerhouse Joshua Smith Joins eXp Realty
NoneHowever, the question remains: can TikTok's Black Friday success be sustained in the long run? While the platform has proven its ability to drive sales and generate revenue through social commerce initiatives, it also faces challenges and uncertainties that could impact its future growth. One such challenge is the competitive landscape of the social commerce industry, with other platforms like Instagram, Facebook, and Pinterest also investing heavily in e-commerce features to attract both users and advertisers.
UCF, LSU face off with improved focus in mind3. Assad Regime: Despite being at the center of the conflict, the Assad regime has emerged as a winner in the post-war scenario. With the backing of its allies, Assad has managed to maintain control over key territories and consolidate his grip on power. The regime's survival against all odds has solidified Assad's hold on the government and diminished the prospects of regime change.
The Pursuit of Justice: Unraveling the Manhattan Murder Mystery
As a vocal presence in the locker room, Gobert is not afraid to hold his teammates accountable and push them to be their best selves. He understands the importance of team chemistry and cohesion, and he goes out of his way to build trust and camaraderie among his fellow players. Whether it's organizing team activities, offering words of encouragement, or simply leading by example, Gobert's leadership is felt throughout the organization.As the dust begins to settle and the market attempts to regain its footing, questions linger about the factors that precipitated the sudden downturn and the lessons that can be learned from this episode. It is clear that risk management, due diligence, and a cautious approach to trading are more critical than ever in navigating the volatile waters of the cryptocurrency market.
WASHINGTON (AP) — As a former and potentially future president, Donald Trump hailed what would become Project 2025 as a road map for “exactly what our movement will do” with another crack at the White House. As the blueprint for a hard-right turn in America became a liability during the 2024 campaign, Trump pulled an about-face . He denied knowing anything about the “ridiculous and abysmal” plans written in part by his first-term aides and allies. Now, after being elected the 47th president on Nov. 5, Trump is stocking his second administration with key players in the detailed effort he temporarily shunned. Most notably, Trump has tapped Russell Vought for an encore as director of the Office of Management and Budget; Tom Homan, his former immigration chief, as “border czar;” and immigration hardliner Stephen Miller as deputy chief of policy . Those moves have accelerated criticisms from Democrats who warn that Trump's election hands government reins to movement conservatives who spent years envisioning how to concentrate power in the West Wing and impose a starkly rightward shift across the U.S. government and society. Trump and his aides maintain that he won a mandate to overhaul Washington. But they maintain the specifics are his alone. “President Trump never had anything to do with Project 2025,” said Trump spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt in a statement. “All of President Trumps' Cabinet nominees and appointments are whole-heartedly committed to President Trump's agenda, not the agenda of outside groups.” Here is a look at what some of Trump's choices portend for his second presidency. As budget chief, Vought envisions a sweeping, powerful perch The Office of Management and Budget director, a role Vought held under Trump previously and requires Senate confirmation, prepares a president's proposed budget and is generally responsible for implementing the administration's agenda across agencies. The job is influential but Vought made clear as author of a Project 2025 chapter on presidential authority that he wants the post to wield more direct power. “The Director must view his job as the best, most comprehensive approximation of the President’s mind,” Vought wrote. The OMB, he wrote, “is a President’s air-traffic control system” and should be “involved in all aspects of the White House policy process,” becoming “powerful enough to override implementing agencies’ bureaucracies.” Trump did not go into such details when naming Vought but implicitly endorsed aggressive action. Vought, the president-elect said, “knows exactly how to dismantle the Deep State” — Trump’s catch-all for federal bureaucracy — and would help “restore fiscal sanity.” In June, speaking on former Trump aide Steve Bannon’s “War Room” podcast, Vought relished the potential tension: “We’re not going to save our country without a little confrontation.” Vought could help Musk and Trump remake government's role and scope The strategy of further concentrating federal authority in the presidency permeates Project 2025's and Trump's campaign proposals. Vought's vision is especially striking when paired with Trump's proposals to dramatically expand the president's control over federal workers and government purse strings — ideas intertwined with the president-elect tapping mega-billionaire Elon Musk and venture capitalist Vivek Ramaswamy to lead a “Department of Government Efficiency.” Trump in his first term sought to remake the federal civil service by reclassifying tens of thousands of federal civil service workers — who have job protection through changes in administration — as political appointees, making them easier to fire and replace with loyalists. Currently, only about 4,000 of the federal government's roughly 2 million workers are political appointees. President Joe Biden rescinded Trump's changes. Trump can now reinstate them. Meanwhile, Musk's and Ramaswamy's sweeping “efficiency” mandates from Trump could turn on an old, defunct constitutional theory that the president — not Congress — is the real gatekeeper of federal spending. In his “Agenda 47,” Trump endorsed so-called “impoundment,” which holds that when lawmakers pass appropriations bills, they simply set a spending ceiling, but not a floor. The president, the theory holds, can simply decide not to spend money on anything he deems unnecessary. Vought did not venture into impoundment in his Project 2025 chapter. But, he wrote, “The President should use every possible tool to propose and impose fiscal discipline on the federal government. Anything short of that would constitute abject failure.” Trump's choice immediately sparked backlash. “Russ Vought is a far-right ideologue who has tried to break the law to give President Trump unilateral authority he does not possess to override the spending decisions of Congress (and) who has and will again fight to give Trump the ability to summarily fire tens of thousands of civil servants,” said Sen. Patty Murray of Washington, a Democrat and outgoing Senate Appropriations chairwoman. Reps. Jamie Raskin of Maryland and Melanie Stansbury of New Mexico, leading Democrats on the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability, said Vought wants to “dismantle the expert federal workforce” to the detriment of Americans who depend on everything from veterans' health care to Social Security benefits. “Pain itself is the agenda,” they said. Homan and Miller reflect Trump's and Project 2025's immigration overl ap Trump’s protests about Project 2025 always glossed over overlaps in the two agendas . Both want to reimpose Trump-era immigration limits. Project 2025 includes a litany of detailed proposals for various U.S. immigration statutes, executive branch rules and agreements with other countries — reducing the number of refugees, work visa recipients and asylum seekers, for example. Miller is one of Trump's longest-serving advisers and architect of his immigration ideas, including his promise of the largest deportation force in U.S. history. As deputy policy chief, which is not subject to Senate confirmation, Miller would remain in Trump's West Wing inner circle. “America is for Americans and Americans only,” Miller said at Trump’s Madison Square Garden rally on Oct. 27. “America First Legal,” Miller’s organization founded as an ideological counter to the American Civil Liberties Union, was listed as an advisory group to Project 2025 until Miller asked that the name be removed because of negative attention. Homan, a Project 2025 named contributor, was an acting U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement director during Trump’s first presidency, playing a key role in what became known as Trump's “family separation policy.” Previewing Trump 2.0 earlier this year, Homan said: “No one’s off the table. If you’re here illegally, you better be looking over your shoulder.” Project 2025 contributors slated for CIA and Federal Communications chiefs John Ratcliffe, Trump's pick to lead the CIA , was previously one of Trump's directors of national intelligence. He is a Project 2025 contributor. The document's chapter on U.S. intelligence was written by Dustin Carmack, Ratcliffe's chief of staff in the first Trump administration. Reflecting Ratcliffe's and Trump's approach, Carmack declared the intelligence establishment too cautious. Ratcliffe, like the chapter attributed to Carmack, is hawkish toward China. Throughout the Project 2025 document, Beijing is framed as a U.S. adversary that cannot be trusted. Brendan Carr, the senior Republican on the Federal Communications Commission, wrote Project 2025's FCC chapter and is now Trump's pick to chair the panel. Carr wrote that the FCC chairman “is empowered with significant authority that is not shared” with other FCC members. He called for the FCC to address “threats to individual liberty posed by corporations that are abusing dominant positions in the market,” specifically “Big Tech and its attempts to drive diverse political viewpoints from the digital town square.” He called for more stringent transparency rules for social media platforms like Facebook and YouTube and “empower consumers to choose their own content filters and fact checkers, if any.” Carr and Ratcliffe would require Senate confirmation for their posts.
Pa. broadband authority gives laptops to libraries, nonprofits for public useThe Dow Jones Industrial Average is the oldest stock market index in the U.S. It is a price-weighted index that tracks the performance of 30 of the largest publicly traded companies in the country. Its member companies span a variety of sectors and industries, and it is considered by many to be a reliable indicator of stock market performance and the health of the overall economy. There are only a few broad criteria for a company's inclusion: Be incorporated and headquartered in the U.S. Have the largest percentage of revenue derived from the U.S. Be a member of the S&P 500 . Be a non-transportation or non-utility company. Because it's price-weighted, the highest-priced stock should be no more than 10 times that of the lowest-priced stock in the index. The company must have "an excellent reputation, demonstrate sustained growth, and is of interest to a large number of investors," according to S&P Global . Nvidia ( NVDA -3.22% ) is the most recent addition to the Dow Jones, joining the benchmark on Nov. 8 and replacing chipmaker Intel . That makes it one of only three companies to make the cut so far this year. Over the past decade, Nvidia's revenue has climbed 2,300%, while its net income has surged 8,460%. This, in turn, has fueled stock price gains of 28,940% (as of this writing). As a result of its meteoric rise, the artificial intelligence (AI) chipmaker recently completed a 10-for-1 forward stock split after years of strong business and financial results. The new, lower share price paved the way for Nvidia's inclusion in the Dow. Despite Nvidia's parabolic move higher, many on Wall Street believe the stock still has further to run. From humble beginnings Nvidia has long been known for its prowess in developing top-notch graphics processing units (GPUs) that are the first choice among serious gamers. In 1999, the company pioneered the use of parallel computing in its chips, which allows them to run a multitude of mathematical computations simultaneously. By breaking up these massive compute jobs into smaller, more manageable pieces, the company reinvented the gaming industry. In fact, as recently as early 2022, gaming still represented the majority of Nvidia's revenue. But a paradigm shift was coming. It didn't take long before Nvidia realized it could use this technology in a variety of other applications. By 2006, scientists and data researchers discovered that GPUs could be used for other computationally intensive processes, including high-performance computing (HPC), machine learning (a subset of AI), and data centers. This pivot set the stage for the generative AI revolution that kicked off early last year. It's estimated that Nvidia controls as much as 98% of the data center GPU market, according to semiconductor analyst company TechInsights. Since the vast majority of AI processing takes place in data centers, the accelerating adoption of AI directly benefits Nvidia, as its GPUs are the cornerstone of the technology. The company delivered five consecutive quarters of triple-digit, year-over-year growth, so a slowdown was inevitable. However, its most recent results are still enviable. For its fiscal 2025 third quarter (ended Oct. 27), Nvidia generated record revenue of $35 billion, surging 94% year over year and 17% sequentially. This resulted in adjusted earnings per share (EPS) of $0.81, which soared 103%. Management is predicting its growth spurt will continue, albeit at a more moderate pace. The company is guiding for Q4 revenue of $37.5 billion, which would represent growth of 70%. The biggest unknown, at this point, is the ongoing supply constraints, which management predicts will persist well into next year. However, if Nvidia's suppliers can accelerate output, sales could jump. Wall Street is still bullish on Nvidia Given the company's pivotal position in the AI revolution, Wall Street is understandably bullish on the company's prospects. Of the 64 analysts who have offered an opinion thus far in November, 94% rate the stock a buy or strong buy, and none recommend selling. Furthermore, an average price target of roughly $170 suggests there's still upside potential of 16% compared to Nvidia's closing price on Wednesday. Rosenblatt analyst Hans Mosesmann continues to be the biggest Nvidia bull on Wall Street. In the wake of the company's impressive results and robust guidance, the analyst maintained a buy rating on the stock while increasing his price target to a Street-high $220, which represents potential gains for investors of 50%. Mosesmann cited Nvidia's "beat and raise" quarter, strong demand for its Hopper chips, and the upcoming ramp of its Blackwell architecture as catalysts to push the stock higher. He isn't the only one that's bullish: A whopping 15 analysts boosted their price targets for Nvidia on the heels of its results. Some investors may be hesitant to buy the stock given its lofty valuation, and on the surface, that argument has weight. After all, Nvidia is currently selling for 69 times earnings and 38 times sales, which certainly appears expensive. However, Wall Street expects Nvidia to generate EPS of $4.36 in fiscal 2026, which begins in late January. That works out to roughly 33 times forward earnings. I'd argue that's an attractive price to pay for an industry leader with unrivaled market share and a solid runway for growth ahead. For my money, Nvidia is a buy .
To fully understand the situation, a team conducted an on-site investigation to assess the state of the road and its impact on the local community. The journey to the village involved maneuvering through a series of winding paths, surrounded by lush green fields and quaint farmhouses. However, as the team approached the village, the condition of the road became increasingly evident. Deep potholes punctuated the once-smooth surface, causing vehicles to swerve erratically to avoid damage.In a rapidly changing job market where versatility and adaptability are essential qualities, the student's approach to exploring different career paths is both pragmatic and forward-thinking. By gaining hands-on experience in a variety of roles, she is building a solid foundation for her professional development and enhancing her employability in a competitive job market.
1. Distinct Purposes:First Quarter USM_Dalton 7 pass from Rodemaker (Jesiolowski run), 7:54. Second Quarter USA_Bullock 21 pass from Lopez (Marjan kick), 13:29. USA_J.Webb 32 pass from Lopez (Marjan kick), 8:33. USM_FG C.Gibbs 59, :00. Third Quarter USA_Pritchett 40 pass from Lopez (Marjan kick), 13:25. USA_W.Miller 57 interception return (Marjan kick), 2:42. Fourth Quarter USM_FG C.Gibbs 28, 11:34. USA_Bothwell 2 run (Marjan kick), 8:48. INDIVIDUAL STATISTICS RUSHING_South Alabama, Bothwell 6-104, Bullock 14-54, Eager 1-20, Lopez 5-9, Davenport 1-0. Southern Miss., Clark 12-115, Clay 11-48, Gray 8-24, Mims 1-8, Pittman 1-6, Rodemaker 8-(minus 12), White 2-(minus 20). PASSING_South Alabama, Lopez 15-24-0-193. Southern Miss., Rodemaker 15-27-0-108, White 5-8-1-29, Clay 0-1-0-0. RECEIVING_South Alabama, Pritchett 8-102, J.Webb 3-50, Bullock 2-28, Sandgren 1-10, Eager 1-3. Southern Miss., Clay 5-39, Dalton 3-24, Mims 3-19, Simmons 3-13, Pittman 2-6, Butler 1-18, Reid 1-8, D.Jackson 1-6, Heath 1-4. MISSED FIELD GOALS_Southern Miss., C.Gibbs 30.