kuru toga roulette
NSW Don't miss out on the headlines from NSW. Followed categories will be added to My News. Tommy Herschell spends his days saving kids’ lives. He is not a nurse or a surgeon, a lifeguard or a firefighter, rather each week the former teacher goes back into schools across the country to help put a stop to bullying. Mr Herschell brings bullies and their victims together, resulting in kids opening up about how being targeted by their classmates feels and, in many cases, seeing playground bullies break down in tears and confront their own behaviour. WATCH CHARLOTTE’S WISH DOCUMENTARY HERE His methods may go against the modern-day policies of many schools, but there is overwhelming evidence Mr Herschell’s self-funded Find Ya Feet programs work better than organisations with multimillion-dollar budgets. I t is why Mat and Kelly O’Brien, parents to 12-year-old Charlotte who took her own life after relentless bullying at school, asked for him to join politicians, education experts and leading principals at The Sunday Telegraph’s roundtable into bullying. Tommy Herschell of Find Ya Feet at the bullying round table. Picture: Rohan Kelly Mr Herschell told multiple stories that brought those in the room to tears, one of them about a young boy whose life he saved a few days after Charlotte’s death in September. “It was only a few days after Charlotte passed where a young fella stood at the side of the room and he said, ‘I’m at the point where I’ve had enough, I don’t want to be here and I want to take my own life’,” Mr Herschell said. Grieving parents discuss bullying in schools with ministers and industry leaders at the round table. Picture: Rohan Kelly. “I said, ‘Hey boys, let’s give this fellow an opportunity to tell his story’ and when he got to tell that story, all the other students understood him and could empathise with him. “A few days later that young man messaged me and he said ‘your workshop saved my life, and I’m just so grateful’.” Mr Herschell’s sessions see him rock up in a “Find ya feet” trucker cap and allow the occasional swear word. Sometimes he brings his mates, such as NRL star Nicho Hynes or Test cricketer Mitch Marsh, where they listen to kids and open up about their own experiences of bullying. When asked what he thought could change in the classroom, Mr Herschell said modern-day teachers were like “car salesmen who are not allowed to look under the bonnet”. “I’ve started putting counsellors in schools myself and I call them ‘mental mechanics’,” he said. “They dress like me, talk like me, have the odd swear word, but the improvement in these young people is through the roof .” More Coverage Crackdown on bullies: ‘No single issue that concerns parents more’ Cydonee Mardon and Josh Hanrahan Australia praised for world-leading social media ban Julie Cross and Angira Bharadwaj Originally published as Charlotte’s Wish: How Tommy became a caring, swearing mental mechanic to stop bullying Join the conversation Add your comment to this story To join the conversation, please log in. Don't have an account? Register Join the conversation, you are commenting as Logout More related stories NSW Cyclist in critical condition after being hit by car A man is fighting for life after he was hit by a car in Sydney’s inner west on Sunday morning. Read more NSW Was Biddy’s killer ‘a ticking time bomb’? The mum of 10-year-old Biddy Porter hopes a newly announced inquest into her daughter’s death will look at the role of the Department of Education, GPs and the killers family to see if signs of danger were there. Read moreThe United States Responds to Israeli Airstrikes on Syria, Calling Them "Temporary Measures"
ORCHARD PARK, N.Y. (AP) — There’s plenty of concern and second-guessing to unpack from how the Bills unraveled on defense, special teams and clock management in their loss to the Los Angeles Rams to wonder whether it was premature labeling Buffalo as Super Bowl contenders only a week earlier. But first, the good news. There’s very little wrong with Buffalo’s Josh Allen-led offense after the quarterback strengthened his NFL MVP case. A week after a four-TD performance that included the statistical anomaly of him scoring two touchdowns on the same play in a 35-10 win over San Francisco, Allen became the NFL’s first player to throw and rush for three scores apiece in 44-42 loss to Los Angeles on Sunday . That Allen's latest superhuman-like effort ended in defeat is what’s troubling for the five-time defending AFC East champions (10-3) in their bid to dispel questions of finding ways to fall short in the playoffs in each of the past five years. Buffalo’s defense had few answers in stopping the Rams’ dynamic attack while allowing a season-high 457 yards. Worse still, the Bills allowed Los Angeles to go 11 of 15 on third down for a 73.3 conversion percentage — the third highest allowed by Buffalo and worst since allowing Miami's 75% conversion rate in 1986. If that’s not bad enough, the Bills lost for the first time in 39 games in which they scored at least 42 points, while becoming the NFL’s second team to lose when scoring 42 or more and not committing a turnover. Special teams didn’t help. Aside from allowing a blocked punt to be returned for a touchdown, the Bills couldn’t muster an attempt to block the Rams’ final punt from midfield with 7 seconds left because they only had nine players on the field. As coach Sean McDermott concluded after finally addressing reporters more than an hour after the game ended: “I thought we lost two of the three phases today.” He failed to mention yet another clock management misstep. Rather than have Allen spike the ball to stop the clock after a failed quarterback keeper from the Rams 1 with 62 seconds remaining, McDermott called timeout. That left Buffalo with two timeouts and essentially relying on the slim chances of recovering an onside kick after Allen scored on his next attempt. McDermott defended his decision by saying he feared too much time would elapse before the Bills aligned for another snap. And yet, it would not have matched the 45 seconds the Rams ran off on their final possession after Buffalo used its final two timeouts. Together, these are the types of miscues that have haunted the Bills in their recent playoff losses. The bright side is the loss to the Rams didn’t end the Bills’ season, though they fell two games behind Kansas City (12-1) in the race for the AFC’s top seed . And perhaps, the loss can be chalked up to a team riding a little too high off a playoff-clinching win and having to travel across the country to face a Rams team in the thick of its divisional race. If that’s so, the Bills have a chance to address their flaws — and doubters — by how they respond in what still stands as a juicy showdown at the NFC-leading Detroit Lions (12-1) on Sunday. “They’re the top dog in football right now,” Allen said, looking ahead to Detroit. “We have to have a good week, learn from this one, and put it behind us.” What’s working Scoring. The Bills topped 30 points for a team-record seventh consecutive game and ninth time this season. Buffalo entered the day ranked second in the NFL averaging 30.5 points per outing, behind Detroit (32.1). What needs help Run defense. Though the Rams averaged just 3.3 yards per carry, they stuck with it in finishing with 137 yards, helping them enjoy a 17-minute edge in time of possession. Stock up Allen. If not for him, the Bills wouldn't have been in position to nearly overcome a 17-point fourth-quarter deficit. His 424 yards (342 passing and 82 rushing) accounted for all but 21 yards of Buffalo's total offense. Stock down With so many options, perhaps the focus falls on special teams coordinator Matthew Smiley. This is the second time in 13 months special teams personnel management became an issue. Buffalo was flagged for having too many men as time expired, providing Wil Lutz a second chance to hit a decisive field goal in sealing Denver's 24-22 win last season . Injuries Starting CB Rasul Douglas was sidelined by a knee injury. ... DE Casey Toohill injured his ribs. Key number 80-1-1 — The Bills' record when scoring 38 or more points, including a 38-38 tie with Denver in 1960. Next steps Facing Detroit represents Buffalo's final major test before closing the season with two games against New England and hosting the New York Jets. ___ AP NFL: https://apnews.com/hub/nfl John Wawrow, The Associated Press
As news of Oscar's passing spread, an outpouring of support and condolences flooded in from the community, touching the hearts of all who had been touched by his presence. Many remembered Oscar as a symbol of hope and inspiration, a reminder of the power of love and loyalty in even the most challenging of circumstances.Elevai Labs Inc. Announces Withdrawal of Offer to Exchange and Plans to Reassess
arely a day passes without colleges scolded in the headlines over s or and or and . Schools have become scapegoats for both good and bad reasons. Prominent commentators and populist political leaders from both the far left and far right now target higher education as a common enemy. In fact the current fight over the vs charges of elitism which would not characterize other fields such as sports or entertainment have torn open a seam on the right between Vivek Ramaswamy and Elon Musk in favor of selectivity and merit on one side and Laura Loomer and Matt Goetz on the other. Ramaswamy declared that American culture has “venerated mediocrity over excellence" launching what is termed a within the MAGA movement. Both extremes have arrived on shared areas of concern that include admissions criteria; tolerance of thought on campus; institutional voice; faculty bias in research and education; personal safety; academic integrity; donor influence; curriculum focus; government funding; financial viability, and administrative efficiency. Increasingly, universities, especially selective universities, have been labelled as elitist, self-interested, out-of-touch with societal needs, and lacking accountability. What is new is the convergence of a of elements of the MAGA movement on the right and todays’ self-styled progressives on the left. Together, they find common cause in the skepticism of societal pillars from Wall Street financiers to college educators and politicians. These critiques have corroded public opinion on the value of U.S. higher education, just as the rest of the world treasures the real contributions to the economy, quality of life, scientific knowledge, and cultural enrichment provided by American colleges. The shows a steady decline of confidence in all pillars of society from public officials and the media to clergy and colleges. At the , fully 97% of the college presidents expressed concern over the loss to public confidence in higher education. This summer, the Pew Foundation researchers found roughly half the American public surveyed believe it’s to have a four-year college degree today to obtain a well-paying job than it was 20 years ago even as facts show the opposite is true: a significant wage gap still favors those with . Similarly, a Gallup survey this summer showed a large drop in overall US confidence in higher education from almost 60% in 2015 to almost half that. Now Americans are roughly among those who have a great deal or quite a lot of confidence (36%), some confidence (32%), or little or no confidence (32%) in higher education. In taking a closer look at the Gallup survey, three issues have risen to the top in the public mind: the political climate on our campuses, questions about whether a traditional liberal arts education best prepares our graduates for success in this tech-fueled world and the cost of higher education as represented by a sticker price that is rapidly approaching $100K per year. Increasingly, people across the political spectrum question whether a traditional liberal arts education, as delivered to most undergraduates by the Ivy and other leading institutions, is the best training for leadership in today’s workplace. Indeed, the elite schools do not have a stranglehold on certain sectors. In a study of 628 U.S.-born tech founders from 287 different universities, did not come from Ivy-plus schools. What mattered most in explaining the success of founders was that they graduated from a college. The success of dropouts like Microsoft’s Bill Gates, Apple’s Steve Jobs, and Facebook/Alphabet’s Marc Zuckerberg were exceptions to such findings. Paradoxically, the drop in American public confidence in the liberal arts comes just as the prestige of US universities around the world is at an all-time high and the number of international students studying in the US has climbed to a a year. And innovation for the public good is alive and well at America’s at the leading institutions. Over a third of US research universities have spinning out anywhere from 30 to 80 new business a year employing millions of US workers and serving as a source of economic development to communities around the nation. Higher education is the most globally competitive of all US sectors. The US is home to the by far (36). Research by the National Bureau of Economic Research has shown from Ivy League schools in particular. While less than half of one percent of Americans attend the eight Ivy League colleges, Chicago, Duke, MIT, and Stanford (known as Ivy Plus schools), these universities contributed more than 10% of Fortune 500 CEOs, a quarter of U.S. Senators, half of all Rhodes scholars, and three-fourths of Supreme Court justices appointed in the last half century. Roughly 22% of all , selected by judges from around the world, were affiliated with Ivy Leagues schools. This scholarship has contributed mightily to the advance of science and industry. The renowned corporate research labs of General Electric (Menlo Park), AT&T (Bell Labs), Xerox (Palo Alto Research Center) have largely disappeared with diminished research even at major chemical and pharmaceutical companies. Most of the great advances in material sciences, agricultural science, drug development, public health, environmental safety, and computer science and the internet originate in the university world. It must be noted, however, that the value of higher education should be appreciated for more than winning awards and creating wealth but also for quality of life. A decade ago, former Duke President Richard Brodhead co-chaired the Commission on the Humanities and Social Sciences for the American Academy of Arts & Sciences. In summarizing their findings, stated, that value of higher education is not to be measured merely by income earned by colleges graduates. “Its value is that it supplies enrichment to personal lives, equips students to be thoughtful and constructive social contributors, and prepares them to participate fully and creatively in the dynamic, ever-changing world that awaits them after college. It's easy to see why people might get anxious about something so difficult to calculate, and might want a straighter line to the payoff. But the fruits of such education can only be reckoned over long time-horizons, as they enable people to rise to challenges and seize opportunities they could not foresee at first. The lives of successful people almost never involve continuing to do what they prepared for. As their lives unfold, they find that by drawing on their preparation in unexpected ways, they're able to do things they hadn't intended or imagined.” Probably no issue about American higher education has received as much attention over a sustained period of time than its cost. And while some of the increase in the sticker price of leading universities can be explained by investments in need-based financial aid even the costs net of financial aid have risen between 1 and 2 percent above any reasonable measure of inflation for decades. Studies show levels of student debt rising at alarming rates. And while much of the focus has been on undergraduates, levels of student loan debt among those receiving master’s degrees is a more severe issue. Concerns about student loan debt are exacerbated by the fact that six-year graduation rates for undergraduates across all of higher education are less than 60%. So, too many students find themselves in the worst possible situation – a boatload of debt and no degree to show for it. In speaking about cost, the political right characterizes elite higher ed institutions as inefficient organizations choking on administrative bloat. The political left laments their high cost saying that the sticker price alone turns off prospective students from low socio-economic backgrounds. Both sides note the explosive growth in endowment values and want endowments to be tapped to reduce costs. The Ivy Plus institutions counter by noting their impressive investments in financial aid, the fact that they have six-year graduation rates in excess of 95% and the inherently high cost of the bundle of educational experiences that today’s students and their families expect. At these schools with strong endowments, roughly has their tuition bill covered by financial aid. Indeed, the more selective schools not only offer a challenging curriculum delivered through small classes with abundant academic support, but also house and feed students, offer them primary health care, undergraduate research and entrepreneurial activities, intramural and varsity athletics, artistic and performance opportunities, study abroad and much more. The cost of delivering all this is in excess of $100K per student per year at many institutions. These expenditures not only enrich the student experience but also enhance their local economies. American universities employ over adding $ annually to the GDP and their technology transfers have contributed over to the nation’s GOP in the last twenty years. Still, criticisms of the cost of American higher education have merit. Indeed, too many institutions have lost sight of the fact that their core missions are teaching, learning and discovery and those elements of their core mission should be prioritized in their budget decisions. have been shown to have soared disproportionately, in fact geometrically, compared to faculty staffing costs which only increased arithmetically, alongside only modest student enrollment increases. Academic leaders must also demand that administrative and support functions operate as efficiently as possible with new programs funded through internal reallocation. Many of these critiques are based in legitimate concerns and point to areas where the leading institutions of higher education can do better. However, they often overstate their case and present outlier examples. For example, published a countering the suggestion that liberal bias plays a meaningful role in tenure decisions. Indeed, their study concluded that professors were more likely to be dismissed for liberal thought. And it is incorrect to still label higher education a self-perpetuating caste system. Looking at roughly a century of data, as an example of elite universities, its student profile has shifted from 100% males to roughly 50/50; 27% of Mayflower/Social Register “Colonial” lineage to less than 6%; less than 2% underrepresented minorities to over 10% ; 0.4% Asian to 19%; 24% from elite prep schools to 4%. Plus, the report card on the impact of upward wealth mobility of these prestigious schools is much more encouraging that the critics from the left and the right acknowledge. Researchers from the National Bureau of Economic Research studied at each college in the United States using data for over 30 million college students from 1999-2013 and found the students from low-income families and high-income families, had comparable incomes, when matched by the school they attended. Thus, the school had an uplifting impact on the wealth of low-income students. Furthermore, this research found, “The colleges that channel the most children from low- or middle-income families to the top 1% are almost exclusively highly selective institutions, such as UC–Berkeley and the Ivy Plus colleges. No college offers an upper-tail (top 1%) success rate comparable to elite private universities – at which 13% of students from the bottom quintile reach the top 1% – while also offering high levels of access to low-income students.” Interestingly, the critics of elite schools, indirectly but selectively cite from this research cherry picking around the upward mobility case for elite educational institutions. Similarly looking at Yale’s current first year class, benefit from some form of financial aid, thanks to the healthy endowments, 88% with zero debt and the who do have debt, owe less than $15,000, hardly a crushing burden. Thanks to a half billion dollars raised from alumni during their recent capital campaign, leaders were able to declare that "The Class of 2028 is the most socioeconomically diverse class in Dartmouth's history," with roughly 20% students from low income families receiving Pell Grants, over half of the class receiving financial aid, and no parental financial contributions for families earning less than $125,000 a year roughly 22% of the class. Despite such facts, Columnist David Brooks wrote in The Atlantic a piece entitled “How The Ivy League Broke America” where he echoes himself in a series of similar pieces he wrote in the New York Times such as one titled and , both which said elites were leaving others behind. His newest piece in this month’s concluded strangely that “a large mass of voters has shoved a big middle finger in the elites’ faces by voting for Donald Trump.” Of course, Brooks misses the irony that if this anti-Ivy League resentment drove voters, then is drove them to vote for the GOP ticket of two Ivy Leaguer grads, Donald Trump from Penn and J.D. Vance from Yale, and not the Democratic ticket of state school grads. Brooks joins a chorus of others who say that the meritocracy overrated. He cites Yale Law professor Daniel Markovits, the author of charging that applicants whose families come from the top 1 percent of wage earners were 77 times more likely to attend an Ivy League-level school than students from families making below $30,000 a year. Brooks adds that elite schools generally admit more students from the top 1 percent than the bottom 60. Then he joins Markovits in pronouncing the academic gap between the rich and the poor larger than the academic gap between white and Black students in the final days of Jim Crow. Brooks’s remedies include circumvention of new court barriers to affirmative action diversity goals, reducing the reliance upon standardized testing, emphasizing more humanistic qualities, substituting AI for analytic rigor, improving the colleges’ marketing of their own value, and that “we should aim to shrink the cultural significance of school in American society.” Missing from this list is any concern for the spreading caution of overexercising voice under the cloak of “institutional neutrality.” These practices the actual selective practices of the University of Chicago and similar schools which purported to limit presidents from showing the same periodic moral responsibility, patriotic duties, and institutional voice of other pillars of American society. Should Ivy Plus leaders even care about public support? After all, they are highly successful, highly selective institutions that are the envy of the world. Our answer is that these leaders should care about the erosion of public trust – a lot. To ignore this growing public distrust is to not only invite more public shaming by government officials as we saw in the House hearings this past year but potentially court more governmental actions such as endowment taxes, bans on DEI programs at public universities and similar interventions. Although the Ivy Plus institutions seem secure at the moment, one already sees the impacts of the loss of public trust across much of American higher education, significant reductions over the last 25 years in per-capita, inflation-adjusted state appropriations, the expansion of students wanting three-year, no-frills, degrees, employers seeking micro-credentialling rather than a bachelor’s degree, on-line course sharing among institutions to lower costs and ultimately lower enrollments. Certainly, higher education must address the ideological orthodoxy of political correctness which has diverted tolerance for original thought. Towards that end, we see newly emerging efforts to promote dialogue around difficult societal issues on a number of campuses. Similarly, universities do not do a great job with administrative efficiency with mushrooming overhead along with programs and departments that live on in perpetuity. Higher education has long been the target of satire from the Marx Brothers to Rodney Dangerfield’s “Back to School.” All institutions need constructive feedback to respond to changing societal needs, but the ideologically driven attacks on schools have lost their grounding, not to mention their humor, and risk promoting an age of ignorance.AP Trending SummaryBrief at 5:32 p.m. EST
“Hot Ones” finale: Ben Stiller defends “Zoolander 2” — and a scene cut from the first filmFlowserve Corp. stock underperforms Friday when compared to competitors despite daily gains
Moreover, the focus on individual choices and responsibility in the discourse surrounding fast-food dinners overlooks the broader systemic issues that contribute to their popularity. The fast-paced nature of modern life, the rise of dual-income households, and the lack of affordable and healthy food options in certain communities all contribute to the demand for convenient meal solutions. Rather than vilifying those who choose fast-food dinners, it is essential to address the underlying factors that drive this trend.As many companies are cutting back or ending diversity initiatives, Costco's Board of Trustees is pushing back on efforts to end the company's DEI programs. The Board urged its shareholders to vote against a proposal submitted by the National Center for Public Policy Research that called on Costco to eliminate DEI programs. The group claims that DEI programs are discriminatory and put the company at financial risk. "It's clear that DEI holds litigation, reputational and financial risks to the Company, and therefore financial risks to shareholders," the National Center for Public Policy Research wrote in its letter of support. RELATED STORY | US companies are rolling back DEI programs to critics' praise, but consumers don't agree, data shows In response, Costco's Board of Trustees voted unanimously to urge shareholders to decline the proposal. Shareholders will have their say on Jan. 23. "Our success at Costco Wholesale has been built on service to our critical stakeholders: employees, members, and suppliers," the Board wrote in response to the proposal. "Our efforts around diversity, equity and inclusion follow our code of ethics: For our employees, these efforts are built around inclusion – having all of our employees feel valued and respected. Our efforts at diversity, equity and inclusion remind and reinforce with everyone at our Company the importance of creating opportunities for all. "We believe that these efforts enhance our capacity to attract and retain employees who will help our business succeed. This capacity is critical because we owe our success to our now over 300,000 employees around the globe." The National Center for Public Policy Search said the Supreme Court decision reached in 2023 in SFFA v. Harvard indicated that companies' DEI programs could potentially be illegal. The Supreme Court ruled that affirmative action policies by colleges violated the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. RELATED STORY | Costco memberships grow despite price increase as profits surge Costco's Board countered that the group was incorrect on its belief that the company's DEI policies violate the law. "We believe that our diversity, equity and inclusion efforts are legally appropriate, and nothing in the proposal demonstrates otherwise. As part of our obeying the law, all decisions regarding recruiting, hiring, promotion, assignment, training, termination, and other terms and conditions of employment will be made without unlawful discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, religion, age, pregnancy disability, work-related injury, covered military or veteran status, political ideology or expression, genetic information, marital status, or other protected status," Costco's Board said in response.
NoneGeorgia Bulldogs quarterback Carson Beck lost draft stock since undergoing UCL repair surgery earlier this season, but that hasn't stopped him from moving forward. Beck posted to social media on Friday officially declaring for the 2025 NFL Draft. "First off I want to thank God, for blessing me with the opportunity to play the game I love. Through the ups and downs, the highs and lows, everything that this game produces and provides i'm eternally grateful for. Football has taught me lessons that will last a lifetime and has grown me into the person I am today," Beck said on Instagram . Beck endured the elbow injury on the final play against Texas in the SEC Championship game on Dec. 7. He underwent the surgery on Monday in Los Angeles, ending his college football career, and is expected to make a full recovery. Though it could all still make things more hazy for Beck as he prepares for the draft. Carson Beck announces he's declaring for the NFL Draft in an Instagram post. He says he'll be there to support UGA this season however he can. Beck recently had elbow surgery, which will complicate his pre-draft process significantly. pic.twitter.com/1azPRWSj55 The 6-foot-4 signal-caller is completing his fifth season at Georgia, which he was granted because of the COVID disruptions in 2020 and having only appeared in three games in the season that followed. In the past two seasons, Beck has started under center for the Bulldogs, having led them to a 24-3 record in that span. Beck didn't post the same numbers he did in 2023 despite beginning the campaign as a Heisman candidate. The 2023 All-SEC second-team honoree who had thrown for almost 4,000 yards slipped with interception rates midway through this year, tossing 11 of his 12 total during a five-game stretch. More News: Saints Determine Playing Status for Derek Carr and Alvin Kamara vs Raiders He was still an effective quarterback, however, touching 3,485 passing yards and 28 total touchdowns. However, the losses of offensive cornerstones in wide rreceiverLadd McConkey and tight end Brock Bowers have proven to have affected Beck's output. "To my teammates, i've been blessed to play with not only so many talented guys, but guys who are good people," Beck said in his post. "There's so many bonds that have been built that will last a lifetime and the people in that locker room is what I'll miss most. I enjoyed every second of being with you guys and love you guys like brothers. It's been an honor and I wouldn't want to go to war with anyone else. There's unfinished business still this season and i'll be here to support however I can, finish strong!" Heading into the 2024 season, ESPN's Mel Kiper had ranked Beck as a top-two quarterback for the upcoming draft alongside Colorado's Shedeur Sanders. His latest rankings have Beck listed at No. 4 in this quarterback class with Miami's Cam Ward and Alabama's Jalen Milroe climbing above him. Once projected a first-round pick by CBS Sports, its projections now reflect Beck's drop into the second round of the draft. For more on NCAA Football or the NFL , head to Newsweek Sports .
Travis Kelce's anger spotted by Taylor Swift fans as he misses final Eras Tour showIn recent years, a trend has emerged among young people in China, where ancient cultural relics such as those from Dunhuang and Sanxingdui have been featured as designs on popular mobile phone skins. These relics, renowned for their historical significance and artistic beauty, have now become symbols of both style and good luck for the younger generation.The clash between Juventus and Manchester City is not just a battle of two top teams, but also a meeting of two football philosophies. Juventus, with their disciplined defensive style and efficient counter-attacking play, will look to stifle Manchester City's free-flowing, possession-based approach. It will be a tactical chess match between Allegri and Guardiola, with both managers known for their attention to detail and ability to outsmart their opponents.
Title: Research Shows Women Sleep Less, Wake Up More Frequently, and Face Greater Health Impacts
The Growing Importance of Corporate Law Firms in India India’s economic growth has created an unprecedented demand for sophisticated legal services. Corporate law firms play a critical role in ensuring businesses comply with regulations, manage risks, and navigate complex transactions. These firms offer services ranging from mergers and acquisitions to dispute resolution, catering to domestic and international clients. Here is a list of the top 10 best corporate law firms in India in 2025, known for their legal expertise and exceptional client service. 1. AZB & Partners AZB & Partners is a heavyweight in India’s corporate law landscape, with a strong presence in Mumbai, Delhi, and Bangalore. Known for its expertise in mergers and acquisitions, private equity, and banking laws, the firm has consistently ranked among the best. Key Highlights : Advises Fortune 500 companies and leading Indian corporations. Expertise in cross-border transactions and regulatory compliance. Awarded “Law Firm of the Year” multiple times. 2. Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co. Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co. is one of the oldest and most prestigious corporate law firms in India. With a robust team of over 600 lawyers, the firm excels in capital markets, real estate, and dispute resolution. Why It Stands Out : Advises on high-stakes transactions for multinational corporations. Strong dispute resolution practice. Deep expertise in intellectual property law. 3. Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas After its split from Shardul Amarchand, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas has emerged as a top-tier corporate law firm. The firm is well-regarded for its focus on innovation and client-centric legal solutions. Services Offered : Mergers and acquisitions. Corporate governance advisory. Banking and finance law. Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas has played a pivotal role in shaping corporate law practices in India. 4. Khaitan & Co. Khaitan & Co. is a powerhouse in corporate and commercial law. Its team of over 750 professionals offers comprehensive legal services, making it a go-to firm for complex legal matters. Key Specializations : Taxation and regulatory compliance. Real estate and infrastructure projects. Insolvency and bankruptcy advisory. 5. Trilegal Trilegal has grown exponentially in the past decade to establish itself as one of the top corporate law firms in India. With a focus on innovation, the firm is known for its solution-driven approach to complex legal challenges. Key Features : Strong presence in private equity and venture capital deals. Expertise in employment and labor laws. Consistently ranked among India’s best law firms. 6. Luthra and Luthra Law Offices India Renowned for its expertise in regulatory frameworks, Luthra and Luthra offers unmatched services in corporate restructuring and dispute resolution. Its innovative solutions cater to a diverse range of industries. What Sets It Apart : Focus on infrastructure and energy sectors. Advisory services for startups and SMEs. Recognized for excellence in arbitration. 7. J. Sagar Associates (JSA) JSA is synonymous with trust and reliability in the corporate law sector. With offices in key cities, the firm specializes in providing tailored legal solutions for its clients. Core Services : Corporate advisory. Litigation and arbitration. Intellectual property rights. 8. Economic Laws Practice (ELP) ELP is a full-service law firm with expertise in corporate and commercial law. It is widely respected for its strong focus on tax law and international trade. Key Areas of Expertise : Mergers and acquisitions. Tax advisory and litigation. Competition law. 9. Nishith Desai Associates Nishith Desai Associates stands out for its cutting-edge work in technology law, private equity, and intellectual property. The firm is known for its forward-thinking and research-based approach. Top Features : Expertise in emerging sectors like fintech and blockchain. Strong focus on legal research and innovation. Global recognition for its legal acumen. 10. Phoenix Legal Phoenix Legal is a boutique law firm that has quickly risen to prominence in corporate law. It offers personalized services and pragmatic solutions to its clients. Key Strengths : Expertise in energy, shipping, and aviation sectors. Strong focus on client relationships. Excellent track record in dispute resolution. Why These Corporate Law Firms Stand Out These corporate law firms have earned their reputation through consistent performance, deep legal expertise, and a client-first approach. They cater to diverse industries, including technology, real estate, banking, and infrastructure, ensuring businesses receive top-notch legal counsel. Key Factors Behind Their Success : Trends Shaping Corporate Law in India Technology Adoption : Automation and AI are transforming legal research and compliance. Focus on Sustainability : Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) laws are gaining traction. Globalization : Increasing cross-border transactions require firms to adapt to global standards. Specialization : Firms are developing niche practices in areas like fintech, cryptocurrency, and data privacy. Conclusion The top 10 best corporate law firms in India for 2025 represent the pinnacle of legal expertise and client satisfaction. Whether you’re a multinational corporation or a startup, these corporate law firms provide unparalleled services tailored to your needs. With a focus on innovation, professionalism, and global outlook, they are shaping the future of corporate law in India.
In light of these developments, businesses and organizations that rely on cloud services are advised to review their own disaster recovery and business continuity plans, ensuring that they are adequately prepared to address and mitigate the impact of potential disruptions to their cloud operations.