
Kendrick Lamar surprises with new album 'GNX'Article content When “pro-Palestinian” protesters shut down one of Canada’s busiest intersections in Toronto for a prayer service, police said there was nothing they could do because prayer is protected by the Charter of Rights. Recommended Videos In other words, the rights of people trying to go about their daily lives were subordinate to the rights of protesters who took it upon themselves to stage a religious service on public streets. Quebec Premier Francois Legault, at least, is looking for a way to outlaw such practices in his province and says he might invoke the Charter’s notwithstanding clause to do it. “Seeing people praying in the streets, in public parks, is not something we want in Quebec,” Legault said on Friday, as he also promised to introduce legislation to strengthen secularism in the province’s schools. “There are teachers who are bringing Islamist religious concepts into Quebec schools,” Legault said. “I will definitely not tolerate that. We don’t want that in Quebec.” Calls for the government to take action were prompted by a government report and media stories on teachers allowing prayer in classrooms and school hallways, preventing girls from playing sports and disrupting a sex education class. By contrast, in Ontario, to cite just one example, recitation of the Lord’s Prayer in school classrooms has been banned since 1988. The Canadian Muslin Forum condemned Legault’s statements, arguing he views Muslims as second-class citizens and that “these remarks add to a pattern of political rhetoric that unfairly targets Quebecers, especially those of Muslim faith, based solely on their backgrounds.” Our view is that while our governments at all levels constantly lecture us that Canada is a secular society, they then make exceptions for one religion. Add to that the fact that some “pro-Palestinian protesters” have been allowed to call for the death of Jews, in public, for more than a year, without consequences, while police advise law-abiding Jews to vacate the area because it might upset the protesters. We believe that any death threats to Muslims, Jews, Christians or followers of any other faith should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. But it is also time for our political leaders to start pushing back on these blatant double standards and not just in Quebec.Middle East latest: Syria's forces withdraw from Homs, a key link between the capital and coast
Is Malik Nabers playing this week? Injury update, fantasy outlook for Giants' WR ahead of Week 12 vs. Buccaneers | Sporting News
AP News Summary at 9:17 p.m. EST
They are investigating whether his short-lived martial law decree earlier this month amounted to rebellion. The Corruption Investigation Office for High-Ranking Officials, which is leading a joint investigation with police and military authorities into the power grab that lasted only a few hours, confirmed it requested the warrant on Monday. Investigators plan to question Mr Yoon on charges of abuse of authority and orchestrating a rebellion. Mr Yoon has dodged several requests by the joint investigation team and public prosecutors to appear for questioning and has also blocked searches of his offices. It is not clear whether the court will grant the warrant or whether Mr Yoon can be compelled to appear for questioning. Under the country’s laws, locations potentially linked to military secrets cannot be seized or searched without the consent of the person in charge and it is unlikely Mr Yoon will voluntarily leave his residence if he faces detainment. Mr Yoon’s presidential powers were suspended after the National Assembly voted to impeach him on December 14 over his imposition of martial law that lasted only hours but has triggered weeks of political turmoil, halted high-level diplomacy and rattled financial markets. His fate lies with the Constitutional Court, which has begun deliberations on whether to uphold the impeachment and formally remove Mr Yoon from office or reinstate him. Mr Yoon has defended the martial law decree as a necessary act of governance, describing it as a warning against the liberal opposition Democratic Party, which has been bogging down his agenda with its majority in the parliament. Parliament voted last week to also impeach Prime Minister Han Duck-soo, who had assumed the role of acting president after Mr Yoon’s powers were suspended, over his reluctance to fill three Constitutional Court vacancies ahead of the court’s review of Mr Yoon’s case. The country’s new interim leader is Deputy Prime Minister Choi Sang-mok, who is also finance minister.
FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. (AP) — Republican senators pushed back on Sunday against criticism from Democrats that Tulsi Gabbard , Donald Trump's pick to lead U.S. intelligence services , is “compromised” by her comments supportive of Russia and secret meetings , as a congresswoman, with Syria’s president, a close ally of the Kremlin and Iran. Sen. Tammy Duckworth, D-Illinois, a veteran of combat missions in Iraq, said she had concerns about Tulsi Gabbard, Trump's choice to be director of national intelligence . “I think she’s compromised," Duckworth said on CNN’s “State of the Union," citing Gabbard's 2017 trip to Syria, where she held talks with Syrian President Bashar Assad. Gabbard was a Democratic House member from Hawaii at the time. “The U.S. intelligence community has identified her as having troubling relationships with America’s foes. And so my worry is that she couldn’t pass a background check,” Duckworth said. Gabbard, who said last month she is joining the Republican party, has served in the Army National Guard for more than two decades. She was deployed to Iraq and Kuwait and, according to the Hawaii National Guard, received a Combat Medical Badge in 2005 for “participation in combat operations under enemy hostile fire in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom III." Duckworth's comments drew immediate backlash from Republicans. “For her to say ridiculous and outright dangerous words like that is wrong," Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Oklahoma, said on CNN, challenging Duckworth to retract her words. “That’s the most dangerous thing she could say — is that a United States lieutenant colonel in the United States Army is compromised and is an asset of Russia.” In recent days, other Democrats have accused Gabbard without evidence of being a “Russian asset.” Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a Massachusetts Democrat, has claimed, without offering details, that Gabbard is in Russian President Vladimir “Putin’s pocket.” Mullin and others say the criticism from Democrats is rooted in the fact that Gabbard left their party and has become a Trump ally. Democrats say they worry that Gabbard's selection as national intelligence chief endangers ties with allies and gives Russia a win. Rep. Adam Schiff, a California Democrat just elected to the Senate, said he would not describe Gabbard as a Russian asset, but said she had “very questionable judgment.” “The problem is if our foreign allies don’t trust the head of our intelligence agencies, they’ll stop sharing information with us,” Schiff said on NBC's “Meet the Press.” Gabbard in 2022 endorsed one of Russia’s justifications for invading Ukraine : the existence of dozens of U.S.-funded biolabs working on some of the world’s nastiest pathogens. The labs are part of an international effort to control outbreaks and stop bioweapons, but Moscow claimed Ukraine was using them to create deadly bioweapons. Gabbard said she just voiced concerns about protecting the labs. Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Missouri, said he thought it was “totally ridiculous” that Gabbard was being cast as a Russian asset for having different political views. “It’s insulting. It’s a slur, quite frankly. There’s no evidence that she’s a asset of another country,” he said on NBC. Sen. James Lankford, another Oklahoma Republican, acknowledged having “lots of questions” for Gabbard as the Senate considers her nomination to lead the intelligence services. Lankford said on NBC that he wants to ask Gabbard about her meeting with Assad and some of her past comments about Russia. “We want to know what the purpose was and what the direction for that was. As a member of Congress, we want to get a chance to talk about past comments that she’s made and get them into full context,” Lankford said. Get any of our free daily email newsletters — news headlines, opinion, e-edition, obituaries and more.
NoneTrump’s pick for secretary of education goes viral for clips from WWE pastMarijuana plants at a 605 Cannabis grow operation. Courtesy photo. The nascent Office of Cannabis Management unlawfully denied two women from participating in the lottery for social equity licenses to operate cannabis businesses in Minnesota, a new lawsuit alleges. Plaintiffs Cristina Aranguiz and Jodi Connolly in a lawsuit filed Thursday allege that the state, in an “arbitrary and capricious decision,” denied their applications to participate in the lottery for social equity licenses without explanation and granted other applicants “secret reconsideration” and the opportunity to fix their applications. They are asking the court to halt social equity lottery proceedings, expected to take place on Tuesday, and reverse the OCM’s decision denying Aranguiz and Connolly a chance to participate in the lottery. Social equity licenses are intended to prioritize business applications from people who have been harmed by marijuana prohibition in the past, as well as veterans and people living in high-poverty areas. The OCM earlier this week announced that it sent rejection notices to 1,169 of the 1,817 social equity applicants, according to the Star Tribune . Of the 648 remaining, 182 pre-approvals will be awarded on Tuesday. A lottery for additional pre-approvals will be held in the future, but the OCM hasn’t set a date yet. The OCM in a statement told the Reformer that it cannot comment on pending litigation, but as of Friday afternoon it has not changed its plans to hold the lottery on Tuesday. People who win pre-approval in the lottery will be able to line up investors to start their businesses earlier than those who receive traditional cannabis licenses. In their lawsuit, Aranguiz and Connolly state that they both complied with all of OCM’s social equity application requirements, but they were denied earlier this week. OCM didn’t tell the two why they were denied, according to the lawsuit, and Connolly didn’t receive notification that she was denied at all — she had to access the application submission portal. State law doesn’t allow applicants to appeal the OCM’s denials of access to the preapproval lottery, but Aranguiz and Connolly allege in their lawsuit that OCM has “offered a right to appeal to some applicants.” The plaintiffs say they know of at least one person who reached out directly to OCM Interim Director Charlene Briner. Briner forwarded that applicant to OCM Chief Regulatory Officer Max Zappia, who then called the applicant and told them their denial would be reversed, the lawsuit alleges. “Therefore, contrary to the email sent to all applicants, an appeals process does exist for erroneous denials — the process just exists only for applicants willing to ignore OCM’s statement in the emails, locate the contact information for the Interim Director, and pursue their request,” the lawsuit states. The OCM told MinnPost earlier this week that it denied about two-thirds of applications because some applicants made multiple applications, i.e., “flooding the zone,” in an attempt to up their chances in the lottery, or were disguising their true investors. Aranguiz’s social equity application was denied because of failed “disclosure of ownership and control,” the lawsuit states. Aranguiz, who has seven cannabis retail dispensaries across three states, says in the lawsuit that she and Connolly have a “purchase option agreement” that she didn’t initially disclose to OCM, but that’s because it was contingent on state approval, a disclosure that’s not required under state cannabis law, she argues. Other cannabis lawyers told the Star Tribune that they are also considering filing lawsuits on behalf of clients whose applications the OCM rejected.
SEOUL, South Korea (AP) — South Korean law enforcement officials on Monday requested a court warrant to detain impeached President Yoon Suk Yeol as they investigate whether his short-lived martial law decree on Dec. 3 amounted to rebellion. The Corruption Investigation Office for High-Ranking Officials, which is leading a joint investigation with police and military authorities into the that lasted only a few hours, confirmed it requested the warrant from the Seoul Western District Court. They plan to question Yoon on charges of abuse of authority and orchestrating a rebellion. Yoon has dodged several requests by the joint investigation team and public prosecutors to appear for questioning and has also blocked searches of his offices. It’s not clear whether the court will grant the warrant or whether Yoon can be compelled to appear for questioning. Under the country’s laws, locations potentially linked to military secrets cannot be seized or searched without the consent of the person in charge, and it’s unlikely that Yoon will voluntarily leave his residence if he faces detainment. Yoon’s presidential powers were suspended after the National Assembly voted to impeach him on Dec. 14 over his imposition of martial law that lasted only hours but has triggered weeks of political turmoil, halted high-level diplomacy and rattled financial markets. Yoon’s fate now lies with the Constitutional Court, which has begun deliberations on whether to uphold the impeachment and formally remove Yoon from office or reinstate him. Yoon has defended the martial law decree as a necessary act of governance, describing it as a warning against the liberal opposition Democratic Party, which has been bogging down his agenda with its majority in the parliament. Parliament voted last week to also impeach Prime Minister Han Duck-soo, who had assumed the role of acting president after Yoon’s powers were suspended, over his reluctance to fill three Constitutional Court vacancies ahead of the court’s review of Yoon’s case. The country’s new interim leader is Deputy Prime Minister Choi Sang-mok, who is also finance minister. Kim Tong-hyung, The Associated PressA Bull Market Is Here: 2 Supercharged Stocks Down More Than 20% to Buy Right Now
WILMINGTON, N.C. (AP) — Donovan Newby had 18 points in UNC Wilmington's 78-69 victory over Marshall on Saturday. Newby shot 5 for 10 (0 for 3 from 3-point range) and 8 of 11 from the free-throw line for the Seahawks (7-2). Sean Moore scored 14 points while shooting 6 for 11, including 2 for 3 from beyond the arc and added 16 rebounds. Khamari McGriff shot 5 of 6 from the field and 3 for 3 from the line to finish with 13 points, while adding six rebounds. The Thundering Herd (5-4) were led in scoring by Mikal Dawson, who finished with 12 points and two steals. Marshall also got 10 points and nine rebounds from Nate Martin. Dezayne Mingo also had 10 points, eight rebounds and five assists. UNC Wilmington took the lead with 12:17 to go in the first half and did not give it up. The score was 44-34 at halftime, with Moore racking up 12 points. UNC Wilmington was outscored by Marshall in the second half by one point, with Newby scoring a team-high 12 points after halftime. The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar .If You Like Big Tech, You'll Love This ETF That Lets You Invest in Microsoft, Nvidia And Apple At The Same Time - Yahoo Finance