Intel Corp. INTC stock has had a rough ride in 2024 so far, falling by over 56% year-to-date. The reason? The world's leading chipmaker has fallen behind the curve, ceding ground to rivals like Advanced Micro Devices Inc. AMD , Nvidia Corp. NVDA and failing to even catch up to Qualcomm Inc. QCOM on the smartphone side of things. The world's leading chipmaker lost the plot across both establishing as well as emerging technologies – it is no longer as dominant as it was in the x86 space, and companies like Nvidia have utterly dominated the AI chips space. See Also: Nvidia’s AI Dominance Leaves Intel, AMD Scrambling For Second Place Intel's failure to innovate is reflected in its stock performance as well – at $20.92, its stock is roughly back to the same level it was at nearly 27 years ago. To make matters worse for Team Blue, that is Intel (its rival AMD is Team Red,) the company's market capitalization has shrunk enough that there are rumors doing the rounds that rivals like Qualcomm could be interested in scooping it up. Qualcomm's interest in acquiring Intel subsequently waned, reportedly due to the "complexities" involved in the transaction. See Also: Palantir Co-Founder Joe Lonsdale Cheers Trump’s New SEC Pick, Calls Out Gary Gensler For ‘Purposely’ Not Defining Crypto Rules For context, Intel's market capitalization stands at $90.22 billion, while Qualcomm's is at $177.26 billion. Intel's closest rival, AMD, is valued more than two times at $224.91 billion. Nvidia, on the other hand, has a relatively stratospheric market capitalization of $3.488 trillion – worth over 38 times Intel's market capitalization. Things have gotten so bad for Intel, that the chipmaker let go of Pat Gelsinger , an industry and Intel veteran, in a somewhat less-than-ideal fashion. Lack Of Innovation, Manufacturing Difficulties, And Increasing Competition While Intel's woes have been ongoing for several years now, issues with its latest desktop chips were likely the straw that broke the proverbial camel's back. After several reports revealed issues with Intel's 13th and 14th generation chips , the company took notice but eventually gave up on fixing them with software updates. The result? Gelsinger had to leave before realizing his mission to complete the 18A fabrication process – while the company says it has been set in motion, chips made using the process have not been rolled out yet. See Also: MicroStrategy’s Michael Saylor Risks Breaking Down The ‘Magic Money Creation Machine’ With His Growing Bitcoin Bet, Says Expert Gelsinger and Intel would have hoped for the success of 18A, especially to keep its struggling foundry business alive. However, with Gelsinger now out and no suitor in sight, Intel's future seems to be hanging in the balance. Price Action: Intel's stock closed at $20.92 on Friday, up 0.6% for the day. Year-to-date, it has fallen 56.2%. Data from Benzinga Pro shows that analysts have a consensus rating of "Neutral" for the Intel stock. BofA Securities , Northland Capital Markets , and Mizuho are among the three most recent analyst ratings, and their average price target stands at $24, implying a 14.7% upside. Will Intel be able to turn around its fortunes, though? Only time will tell. Check out more of Benzinga's Consumer Tech coverage by following this link . Read Next: AAPL Stock Hits New High Despite Sales Slowdown: Tech Bull Says ‘Street Is Realizing' iPhone 16 Marks The ‘Start Of A Super Cycle' For Apple Disclaimer : This content was partially produced with the help of AI tools and was reviewed and published by Benzinga editors. Photo courtesy: Unsplash © 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.Australian couple stranded in the Outback were stalked by giant crocodile for days after their car was washed away in a flood
Ethereum and Polygon loyalists are focusing on a fresh and interesting prospect in the cryptocurrency market: Rexas Finance (RXS). From its starting presale price of $0.030, RXS has seen an amazing 320% increase, now priced at $0.125 at stage 9 of its presale. With market analysts predicting that RXS will soar to $30.37 by 2025, a startling 24,200% increase, this spectacular growth is only beginning. RXS is positioned to change how real-world assets such as real estate, gold, and art are bought, traded, and owned as the real-world asset (RWA) tokenization market picks steam. Rexas Finance’s Presale Success: A Strong Start Rexas Finance has raised $21,756,302 in its presale, selling 298,048,506 RXS tokens since starting its presale in early September 2024. The presale is moving fast, and as it moves into stage 9, RXS is valued at $0.125, which is already a notable change from its starting price. RXS will launch on three of the top 10 tier-1 exchanges in early 2025, and RXS will most likely see another 60% increase before its actual release at $0.2, which has attracted ETH and POL loyalists to bet big on RXS. Through its community-centric approach, Rexas Finance is gathering pace; it has avoided venture capital financing to establish a devoted base of individual investors. Rexas is building a committed group of supporters who share in its objective of transforming the RWA market. Already listed on CoinMarketCap and CoinGecko, the project increases its profile and lets possible investors monitor the token's development in real-time. A Market Cap of $30 Billion in 2025? Thanks to its creative method of tokenizing real-world assets, market analysts estimate Rexas Finance's market worth might climb to $30.37 billion by 2025. The RWA market is vast, comprising $379.7 trillion in real estate, $121.2 trillion in commodities like gold, and $65 billion yearly in art and antiques. Rexas Finance provides a smooth approach to purchasing, selling, or fractionally owning assets from anywhere globally, bridging the gap between conventional markets and blockchain technologies and attracting loyal investors of ETH and POL. Rexas Finance aims to make actual assets available to everyone with an internet connection, not only to purchase and sell crypto. The platform supports several token standards, ERC-20, ERC-721, and ERC-1155, so users can tokenize assets without any coding experience. The Rexas Token Builder and Launchpad let users fund, construct, and distribute their tokenized assets, democratizing the asset ownership process. Rexas Finance is ready to have a major influence on the world economy by offering instruments allowing the tokenization of everything from real estate to gold and art. With a total supply of 1 billion RXS tokens, the platform aims to provide a flexible, user-friendly approach for anyone to invest in assets usually reserved for the wealthy. The ongoing $1 million giveaway is generating more curiosity in Rexas Finance. With 381,848 total entries and 20 winners slated to gain $50,000 worth of RXS each, the promotion presents a fantastic chance for early participation for investors. Participants can get additional entries by sharing and finishing tasks on the Rexas Finance website, therefore improving their chances of winning and exposing them to the initiative's expansion. Following a Certik examination, Rexas Finance is sure the platform satisfies the best security requirements in the crypto field. With possible investors, this third-party confirmation helps establish confidence and supports RXS's reputation as a viable token to watch in the coming months. Conclusion Rexas Finance is poised to make major changes in 2025 with its community-driven strategy, innovative tokenization technologies, and strategic orientation in the RWA market. Now is the moment to consider investing in RXS during its presale, regardless of your level of loyalty to Ethereum, Polygon, or novice to the crypto scene. Those who buy in early could experience significant gains as the coin becomes ready for release on elite exchanges and its market cap increases toward $30 billion. Invest in RXS right now to seize the chance to be part of the next major development in cryptocurrencies. For more information about Rexas Finance (RXS) visit the links below: Website: https://rexas.com Win $1 Million Giveaway: https://bit.ly/Rexas1M Whitepaper: https://rexas.com/rexas-whitepaper.pdf Twitter/X: https://x.com/rexasfinance Telegram: https://t.me/rexasfinance Join our WhatsApp Channel to get the latest news, exclusives and videos on WhatsApp _____________ Disclaimer: Analytics Insight does not provide financial advice or guidance. Also note that the cryptocurrencies mentioned/listed on the website could potentially be scams, i.e. designed to induce you to invest financial resources that may be lost forever and not be recoverable once investments are made. You are responsible for conducting your own research (DYOR) before making any investments. Read more here.
The Australian government recently proposed a law to introduce a minimum age for access to social media. The law will require technology companies to restrict individuals under the age of 16 from accessing their social media platforms. The government is bringing this Bill forward due to a rampant increase in mental health cases among young Australians. A recent survey shows that about 40% of Australian children and youngsters experience mental health issues, with many linked to social media. Marketing companies tailor their products in ways that hook people from an early age, fostering dependency. These companies promote their products as essential for happiness, creating a cycle where social media users chase happiness like pursuing a mirage. This often leads to a feeling of inadequacy, reduced ability to focus due to constant distractions, declining human-to-human interaction resulting in social isolation, limited communication and self-expression skills, increased exposure to cyberbullying and online scammers, sleep disorders, reduced memory power and a dull, uninspired mind. While banning social media for children under 16 has potential benefits, it also comes with drawbacks, such as: Reduced digital literacy, rebellion at home, particularly if older siblings have access; difficulty adapting to technology when they turn 17; falling behind peers from other countries in terms of digital competency; perception of regression in a world increasingly driven by digital platforms; and challenges for parents in enforcing such curfews. Insights from ancient wisdom Human life, traditionally, is divided into four stages of 25 years each: Brahmacharya,Grihastha, Vanaprastha, and Sannyasa. Brahmacharya is the phase for gathering and strengthening tools for life. During this stage, distractions must be avoided. A naïve mind, captivated by everything enchanting, is easily hijacked and brainwashed. Our scriptures advise parents to protect their children from distractions, such as romantic relationships, substance abuse, and bad company. Traditional gurukuls isolated students from society to help them focus on self-empowerment. Students graduating from this system emerged brimming with energy and ambition to excel. Grihastha or the householder stage is where individuals take responsibility for themselves, their families, and their communities. Vanaprastha is the mentorship phase, preparing the next generation of leaders, while Sannyasa is the final phase, where individuals reflect on their life journey and prepare to conclude life meaningfully. A naïve mind can be guided effectively when offered higher tastes and aspirations. A student shown the higher possibilities of life will not succumb to the cheap allurements of social media. Unfortunately, due to inefficiencies in parenting, lack of time, or inadequate knowledge among teachers, children often turn to social media out of boredom. A holistic solution Australia’s proposed law may face challenges unless parents and schools take proactive steps to nurture young minds by guiding them toward higher possibilities in life. This can be achieved by: Incorporating eternal values: Introduce children to the timeless wisdom found in ancient scriptures, which instil virtues like discipline, compassion, and perseverance. Learning from role models: Children can draw inspiration from role models. Parents and teachers could share autobiographies and biographies of great achievers, inspiring children to strive for excellence and develop resilience. Children could be motivated to choose an ideal person as a role model, guiding their aspirations and behaviour positively. Fostering connection with nature: Promote activities that let children grow with nature, such as gardening, trekking, and environmental care, teaching them to live in harmony with the world around them. While external influences like social media may be difficult to control completely, teaching children to manage their inner minds through mindfulness, yoga, and self-awareness can help them resist distractions and develop inner strength. As parents, educators, and community members, let us unite in nurturing the minds of our future generations and leaders. By creating an environment enriched with higher values, we can empower children to lead meaningful and fulfilling lives. vasudevakriyayoga@gmail.com (The writer is the Melbourne-based founder of Vasudeva Kriya Yoga)Greenwave technology CEO Danny Meeks buys $248,821 in stock
Two premiers are asking Ottawa to cover the provincial cost of the Trudeau government's promised tax holiday. On Thursday, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said he would seek to lift the GST and HST from some goods until mid-February in a bid to alleviate some of the affordability pressures people have been experiencing in the post-pandemic era. But in the five provinces that have a harmonized sales tax — a combination of provincial and federal taxes on goods and services administered by the federal government — the entire tax, including the provincial portion, will be removed. That measure would put a large dent in some province's finances. New Brunswick Premier Susan Holt said Friday that the tax break could cost the province $62 million. Updated Holt says 'surprise' federal tax holiday could cost province $62M Federal government's tax pause will cost P.E.I. coffers about $14 million Trudeau government to send $250 cheques to most people, slash GST on some goods "They can't take $62 million out of the New Brunswick revenues without an engagement with us and an agreement with us," she told reporters. Prince Edward Island Premier Dennis King expressed similar concerns on Friday. He said the measure would cost his province $14 million. "There is no agreement that the federal government would come in and give us that money or make us whole in any way," King told the provincial legislature. "We'll continue working with them and see what we can do, because it would drive a bit of a hole in our budget." King said he's willing to work with the federal government on affordability measures but noted that he wasn't given a heads-up about the tax holiday. "I found out about this yesterday in a news briefing that came across our desk. We did not get the courtesy of a call to say it was coming, or any kind of request for our input," he said. WATCH | Trudeau asked about impact GST break could have on provincial budgets: Trudeau asked about impact GST break could have on provincial budgets 27 minutes ago Duration 0:35 When asked about the impact his recently announced affordability measures could have on provincial budgets, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said he expects his provincial counterparts to recognize the financial challenges Canadians are experiencing. When asked if she expects Ottawa to reimburse the province, Holt said she was "optimistic." Prime Minister Trudeau wouldn't commit to reimbursing provinces for lost revenue when asked about the premiers' concerns on Friday. "I think every provincial government across the country understands how important it is to be there for Canadians who are facing real pressures around the cost of living," he told reporters. "I'm expecting provinces who see the challenges that their citizens are facing to realize that this is a way they can be there for people." Not all provinces are concerned about the federal tax holiday. Ontario already had eliminated the provincial portion of the HST from some of the goods proposed for the federal exemption, including children's clothing, shoes, diapers, books and newspapers. Ontario Premier Doug Ford speaks during a press conference in Hamilton on Friday, Nov. 22, 2024. (CBC) "We did it two years ago. We just didn't go out there and do cartwheels. Eighty per cent of what they say they're going to do, we're doing," Ontario Premier Doug Ford told a press conference on Friday. "I've got to give them kudos. Any government, I don't care what political stripe, wants to put more money into people's pockets, good for them." Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Andrew Furey also endorsed the federal plan and said his government would follow suit. "Our government is focused on affordability for families in Newfoundland and Labrador. We will be removing the HST from many goods and services for two months," he said in a post on X, formerly Twitter. Nova Scotia is currently in an election campaign so its provincial government is in caretaker mode. Feds underestimating cost: economist The federal government says the tax holiday will cost the federal treasury an estimated $1.6 billion in foregone revenue. But economist Trevor Tombe estimates that covering the provincial portion would make the actual cost of the tax break almost double the government's estimate. "For the HST provinces, the compensation they're entitled to in the tax coordination agreements would bring the total cost to something like $3 billion," Toombe said in a post on X.
Bloomfield football is back in its sixth straight state championship game after winning the title last year, top-ranked Windsor aims to stay unbeaten and Sheehan is back for the first time since 2019 as the state football championships will take place Friday and Saturday at Rentschler Field and Arute Field at CCSU.Manitoba government's promise to boost health care being questioned
The world approved a bitterly negotiated climate deal Sunday committing wealthy historic polluters to $300 billion annually for poor and vulnerable nations that had demanded far more to confront the crisis of global warming. After two exhaustive weeks of chaotic bargaining and sleepless nights, nearly 200 nations banged through the contentious finance pact in the early hours beneath a sports stadium roof in Azerbaijan. Nations had struggled to reconcile long-standing divisions over climate finance. Sleep-deprived diplomats, huddled in anxious groups, were still revising the final phrasing on the plenary floor before the deal passed. At points, the talks appeared on the brink of collapse, with developing nations storming out of meetings and threatening to walk away should rich nations not cough up more cash. In the end -- despite repeating that no deal is better than a bad deal -- they did not stand in the way of an agreement, despite it falling well short of what they want. The final deal commits developed nations to pay at least $300 billion a year by 2035 to help developed countries green their economies and prepare for worse disasters. That is up from $100 billion now provided by wealthy nations under a commitment set to expire -- and from the $250 billion proposed in a draft Friday. That offer was slammed as offensively low by developing countries, which have demanded at least $500 billion to build resilience against climate change and cut emissions. A number of countries have accused Azerbaijan, an authoritarian oil and gas exporter, of lacking the experience and will to meet the moment, as the planet again sets temperature records and faces rising deadly disasters. Wealthy countries and small island nations have also been concerned by efforts led by Saudi Arabia to water down calls from last year's summit to phase out fossil fuels. The United States and EU have wanted newly wealthy emerging economies like China -- the world's largest emitter -- to chip in. The final draft encouraged developing countries to make contributions on a voluntary basis, reflecting no change for China which already pays climate finance on its own terms. Wealthy nations said it was politically unrealistic to expect more in direct government funding. Donald Trump, a sceptic of both climate change and foreign assistance, returns to the White House in January and a number of other Western countries have seen right-wing backlashes against the green agenda. The deal posits a larger overall target of $1.3 trillion per year to cope with rising temperatures and disasters, but most would come from private sources. bur-np-sct/lth/jj
Trump takes jab at 'governor' TrudeauCorner kings Arsenal earn 2-0 win over Manchester UnitedNEW YORK — Half of the claims for public matching funds that Mayor Eric Adams’ reelection campaign submitted in the most recent reporting period were deemed “invalid” by the city’s Campaign Finance Board, the highest rejection rate the mayor’s team has faced to date, records obtained by the Daily News show. The rejections come at a critical time for Adams’ campaign. The CFB is weighing whether to give Adams’ 2025 campaign any matching funds at all amid his federal indictment on charges alleging he took illegal political donations and bribes, mostly from Turkish government operatives. Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings. Get the latest news, sports, weather and more delivered right to your inbox.Kyle McCord leads Syracuse to first eight-win regular season in six years with win over UConn
In his efforts to , Elon Musk has thrown his support behind slashing a federal office created in the wake of the Great Recession to regulate financial services used by Americans. "Delete CFPB," Musk wrote on X early Wednesday of the . "There are too many duplicative regulatory agencies." Musk, along with , has been tasked with heading up the Trump-created , or DOGE, and finding ways to reduce spending and streamline bureaucracy within the federal government. The unofficial advisors have floated , laying off staff, and . When reached for comment, a spokesperson for Trump's transition team said she had nothing to add to Musk's statement. While it's unclear how DOGE and the incoming Trump Administration would abolish agencies, if it does, the CFPB could be on the chopping block. Here's a look at its purpose, employee makeup, and political controversies. The CFPB was created by Congress as part of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act. The law aimed to strengthen oversight of Wall Street after its risky mortgage lending practices caused the global financial crisis. The CFPB has a broad mandate to protect Americans from deceptive or abusive practices by US financial firms. The agency investigates consumer complaints related to credit cards, loans, bank accounts, and debt collection and enforces consumer protection laws. Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a professor at Harvard Law School, originally proposed the agency in 2007. In 2010, President Barack Obama appointed Warren to head the CFPB's steering committee to help establish it. "The time for hiding tricks and traps in the fine print is over," Warren said that year. "This new bureau is based on the simple idea that if the playing field is level and families can see what's going on, they will have better tools to make better choices." As of March 2024, the just under 1,700 people, earning an average of about $184,000 a year, according to the Office of Personnel Management. The broke that workforce into six groups; about 43% of CFPB's employees work in the supervision and enforcement of financial institutions, 18% in operations supporting the Bureau's other initiatives, and 14% in research, monitoring, and regulations. Since its founding, the CFPB for consumers through direct compensation, canceled debt, and reduced loan principals. The agency has also issued $5 billion in civil penalties against banks, credit unions, debt collectors, payday lenders, for-profit colleges, and other financial services companies. That money is deposited into a victims' relief fund, with nearly 200 million people eligible for relief. Some of CFPB's most high-profile enforcement actions have been against Bank of America and Wells Fargo. The agency of harming hundreds of thousands of customers by charging illegal fees, withholding credit card cash and reward points, and enrolling them in credit card accounts without their knowledge. Bank of America agreed to pay $250 million. In 2022, Wells Fargo — a record sum — after a CFPB investigation alleged the bank mismanaged auto loans, mortgages, and deposit accounts, causing some customers to lose their vehicles and homes. Last week, the agency finalized a rule like Apple, Google, and Venmo, which offer digital wallets and payment apps and process some 13 billion transactions a year. Earlier this year, the CFPB also limited to $8 a month, compared to the average $32 fee charged by issuers in 2022. Democrats designed the CFPB to have political independence by funding it through the Federal Reserve rather than While Democrats argue that the CFPB's independence is crucial to its efficacy, Republicans say the agency's funding source and governing structure make it and encourage regulatory overreach. Since its founding, the CFPB has faced legal challenges from Republicans and the banking industry, who've taken issue with a slew of agency policies, including those regulating and those making it easier for consumers to . In May 2024, the Supreme Court rejected a constitutional challenge to the agency's funding structure, reversing a lower court decision in a 7-2 ruling. The high court's decision — authored by Justice Clarence Thomas, a conservative — has bolstered the agency but likely won't shield it from ongoing criticism and legal attacks. Not everything the agency does has courted controversy. Recently, the agency won for a new rule that would allow consumers to have more control over how their financial data is used by banks and other financial firms. Read the original article onGlobal Ship Lease Declares Quarterly Dividend on its 8.75% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Shares
Philippine police on Wednesday filed a criminal complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte and her security staff for assaulting security officers and disobeying their orders during an altercation at the House of Representatives on Saturday. Duterte had a busy day on Saturday, having publicly claimed that she hired an assassin to kill President Ferdinand Marcos, Jr., along with his wife and his cousin Martin Romualdez, who is House speaker, if she herself dies. She did this not in heated private conversation but at a news conference, in which she claimed Marcos was planning to have her killed and her hitman was standing by to take him and his wife out in retaliation. The Philippine police and military immediately raised the alert level around President Marcos and increased his security, while the National Security Council declared Duterte a threat to national security and the justice system announced it would summon her for an investigation. Duterte sought to walk back her threat, sort of, by assuring the public she would only kill the president if he killed her first. “Why would I kill him if not for revenge from the grave? There is no reason for me to kill him. What’s the benefit for me?” she said at her damage-control press conference. None of this had any direct bearing on why the police decided to file charges against the vice president. That happened because her chief of staff, Zuleika Lopez, had been placed under detention last week for demonstrating contempt of the House during a corruption inquiry, and when the House voted to extend her detention on Saturday, Duterte and her security detail got rowdy. Lopez and Duterte are both under investigation for misusing funds from the office of the vice presidency. Lopez was cited for contempt and sent into detention at the Veterans Memorial Medical Center (VMMC) last Wednesday. Her offense was skipping a hearing on November 5, ostensibly to visit her sick aunt in the United States. Lopez angered House investigators by giving evasive answers about the abuse of funds, often claiming she had no idea where any of the money went. Lopez was at least calm and polite during her testimony, unlike the volatile Duterte, but she reportedly suffered from panic attacks after she was sent into detention. Lopez had another panic attack on Saturday, when the House ordered her to be transferred from the relatively comfortable VMMC to a women’s prison, at which point Duterte raised both verbal and physical objections. The police said it was necessary to file charges against her to preserve the rule of law. On Tuesday, Duterte was served a subpoena to answer questions about her threats against the president’s life. Marcos said he intends to prosecute her for participating in a “criminal plot” to have him assassinated. Duterte’s father, the equally outspoken former president Rodrigo Duterte, waded into the controversy on Monday by suggesting the military should consider overthrowing Marcos. “There is a fractured governance in the Philippines today. In the face of so many errors there... it is only the military who can correct it,” he said. The elder Duterte demonstrated where his daughter learned her damage-control skills by adding that he was not calling for a coup, but was rather calling for the military to commit mass insubordination, or perhaps go on strike to protest Marcos’ leadership. “They can just say we no longer want to play your game, we’re out,” he explained, calling on military officers to reject the commands of the “drug addict” Marcos. Marcos and his predecessor have taken to accusing each other of drug abuse on a regular basis. In August, a video that purportedly showed Marcos snorting cocaine began circulating on social media. Marcos and his officials dismissed the video as a deepfake, while Rodrigo Duterte insisted it was authentic and said Marcos could only answer the allegations of substance abuse by taking a drug test. These events make it difficult to remember that Marcos, Jr., chose Sara Duterte as his running mate in 2022 in an effort to build “unity” following the end of Rodrigo Duterte’s tempestuous administration. Both Marcos and the younger Duterte won landslide victories for their positions, which are voted on separately in the Philippines. Their relationship soon went sour for various reasons, including angry disagreements about how to handle China. Duterte resigned from her position as education secretary in the Marcos cabinet in June, about six months after her father began referring to President Marcos Jr. as a drug addict. She remains vice president, and Marcos cannot fire her, since it is an elected position.
The 37-year-old striker has scored 25 goals in all competitions since joining the club before the start of this season including 20 in Miami's record-breaking regular season campaign. After winning the Supporters' Shield for the best record in the regular season, with a new points tally record, Miami were eliminated from the playoffs in the first round by Atlanta United. Since then Argentina head coach Gerardo Martino has left the club with his compatriot and Suarez's former team-mate at Barca, Mascherano appointed on Tuesday. "I'm very happy, very excited to continue for another year and to be able to enjoy being here with this fan base, which for us is like family. We feel very, very connected with them, and hopefully, next year, we can bring them even more joy," said Suarez. Miami's president of football operations Raul Sanllehi said Suarez had shown he remains an elite level forward but was also a key component in the dressing room. "Luis was not only our leading scorer this season, but also a leader for the group. His impact cannot be understated," he said. Suarez announced in September he was retiring from international duty with the Uruguay national team after scoring 69 goals in 143 games. The forward played in Europe for Ajax, Liverpool and Atletico Madrid and had a season in Brazil with Gremio before joining Miami. sev/mwJaguars place QB Trevor Lawrence (concussion) on IR
Y-mAbs Presents SADA Platform Preclinical Data and Trial in Progress Posters at the 2024 American Society Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting
9 Stocks I'm Buying As The Market Reaches A Rare Level Of Speculative Fervor