Notre Dame reopens its doors to Macron and other world leaders in a rare symbol of unityZelensky insists on a 'just peace' at Trump Paris meetingSyrian rebels celebrate in captured Homs, set sights on Damascus
Beloved restaurant owner dies after being struck by vehicle in OswegoIn a significant diplomatic development, India and Kuwait have elevated their bilateral relationship, marking it as a strategic partnership. This new alignment was solidified by key agreements, notably a memorandum on defence cooperation. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi engaged in extensive discussions with Kuwaiti leaders, including Emir Sheikh Meshal Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah and other top officials. The talks, held as part of Modi's first trip to Kuwait in over four decades, focused on trade, investment, and cultural exchange, with four major agreements signed. These agreements include areas like sports, culture, and solar energy, alongside the crucial defense pact to bolster cooperation in defense industries and collaboration on research and development. The strategic partnership aims to enhance India-Kuwait relations across varied domains such as technology, security, and infrastructure. The move is expected to create new opportunities, fostering deeper economic and cultural linkages between the two nations, as India strengthens its ties with the Gulf Cooperation Council through Kuwait's presidency. (With inputs from agencies.)
On today’s You Asked: What if your soundbar blocks the bottom of your TV? What’s the best, biggest TV I would personally buy for $5,000? What’s the best-sounding bedroom TV for dialogue clarity? When you need more soundbar space Peter from Prague currently has an older 32-inch TV with a central pedestal stand sitting atop his Blu-ray player. That arrangement allows for the five inches of clearance needed to accommodate their 5-inch-tall soundbar system . Peter is looking to upgrade their TV and has noticed that most stands don’t leave much clearance between the bottom of the TV and whatever it sits on. What are his options? Even TVs with a generous amount of clearance, like the Sony Bravia 8, only offer 3.5 to 4 inches when the legs are mounted to raise the TV up. Peter needs more clearance than what’s allowed by the legs or pedestal that come with just about any TV that I’m aware of. The best bet is to go with a VESA mount pedestal stand. Keep in mind that the larger the TV, the less play you’ll have toward achieving a high degree of clearance from the bottom of the pedestal. You’ll want to take a look at the dimensions of the TV and try to find a schematic that shows the location of the VESA mount holes, relative to the top and bottom of the set. Then, using the specs and dimensions for the pedestal stand, try to ascertain whether mounting the TV to the highest available holes on the stand will provide the needed clearance. It’s a lot of internet searching and math, but that upfront work could help avoid the trial-and-error approach. Of course, it is best to order from a site that has a liberal return or exchange policy, just in case you miscalculate and have to get a different product. You can also get legs that attach to the VESA mount holes, but this can be a less flexible option. Considering you have been using a pedestal stand thus far, you may want to stick with that. I hope this is helpful for anyone who needs more clearance for their TV than what the manufacturers allow for these days. This isn’t the first time I’ve heard from someone who is frustrated that the soundbar blocks the bottom of their TV. Biggest (and best) TV for 5K Pavan from California’s beautiful Bay Area writes: If you have about $5,000 to buy a new TV and only want the biggest size possible with this budget, what would you buy: an 83-inch OLED or 98-inch mini-LED? If it’s an 83-inch OLED, which LG model would you go for: B4 (83-inch C4 and B4 are almost the same except for the brightness booster in C4) or G4? Is paying almost double the price for G4 (compared to B4) worth it, considering both of these models fit the $5,000 budget? If it’s a 98-inch mini-LED, which one will you pick: 98-inch Hisense UX or 98-inch TCL QM8 or something else? Which big TV will you buy in 2024 for about $5,000? So, the first thing to determine is whether you really want the biggest size TV possible for your budget. At first you asked: What TV would I get if I only wanted the biggest size possible? In the next sentence, you asked if my choice would be a 98-inch TV or one that is 15 inches smaller diagonally. This question speaks to a conundrum I point to almost weekly at this point: With a budget of, say, less than $10,000, you can go picture quality over size, or size over picture quality. There’s no escaping it. For me, a 98-inch mini-LED is the only option because that is the biggest TV you can get for under $5,000. When it comes to the model, my choice is between the 98-inch Hisense UX and the 98-inch TCL QM8 — but it’s almost a coin flip. The Hisense UX is a little bit brighter and has a slightly more advanced audio system on board. The TCL is slightly less expensive, but it’s also an awesome-looking TV. The TCL is the smarter buy, but, admittedly, I usually want to wring every nit out of my budget, so I would say Hisense — and Hisense UX in this case. As large as an 83-inch TV is, a 98-inch TV is significantly larger, and 98-inch TVs are a ridiculous amount of fun. The picture quality on both the Hisense and TCL is so amazing, I think you should get the bigger TV. The only reason to get the OLED instead would be if you are exceptionally picky about certain aspects of picture quality and it would bug you if you didn’t have an OLED. (If that’s the case, then you should already know you have to get the OLED.) However, since you listed the 98-inch mini-LEDs as an option, my advice is to get the 98-inch Hisense UX in this particular case. Best-sounding bedroom TV? David from Bradenton, Florida, writes: I’m about to buy an LG C4 65-inch as our primary TV. Meanwhile, my wife would like to replace our bedroom TV with something “that she can hear” (read: that doesn’t need a soundbar to produce decent sound). It would be mostly for streaming shows or movies. While 48 inches would be ideal, I could go to a 55-inch. With no mention of budget, I’m just going straight for the best option, and it’s easy: Get the 48-inch Sony A90K – that’s a 2022 Sony OLED TV and the screen is the speaker system. It uses transducers mounted to the back side of the glass panel so that the panel makes sound (I and most other reviewers have raved about this design’s clarity for years now). Despite it being a 2022 model and only 48 inches, it is an OLED, and a Sony OLED at that, so you will still pay a premium of about $1,300. However, this really is the best-sounding 48-inch TV. I would love it if we could get the 55-inch Panasonic Z95A here in the U.S., but unfortunately it’s not here yet. The Z95A is the king of dialogue clarity, and it does it at low volumes like no other TV I’ve experienced. The Z95A is the only model I would recommend over the A90K, but to get that sound, you’d have to go up to 65 inches, which would be significantly higher in price. A word of warning, though: Sometimes a lack of dialogue clarity is not due to the TV speakers. The way the dialogue and the center channel audio in general is mixed these days is totally inconsistent. Sometimes the show you’re watching has just terrible dialogue clarity in the audio mix (I would caution you to manage expectations with your wife here). Sometimes the problem is the show or the movie and not the TV. You can only do what you can do, and that starts with getting the TV with the best, most direct sound. Forward-facing speakers are hard to come by in TVs these days, so it’s the Sony A90K 48-inch. Getting that ideal white light Debashish writes: I have a question about QD-LED. I know that QD-OLED TVs did away with the color filter and instead use QD color conversion and the actual OLED layer is blue. Do QD-LED TVs also use blue LEDs as backlight and QD color conversion layer instead of the color filter? I’m going to try and help clarify that question with my answer. Simply put, the answer is no. Quantum dots in an LCD TV are not used in a manner similar to QD-OLED TVs. You are correct that in QD-OLED, the quantum dots that glow red and green are used as the light source for those colors. They are extremely accurate red and green so, when paired with the blue OLED pixel, the combination makes for extremely accurate colors with high brightness. Part of that high color brightness comes from not having a color filter involved at all. In an LCD-based TV with quantum dots — most often called a QLED TV — a sheet of red and green quantum dots is used in combination with a bluish LED to create a more pure form of white light than is possible with a blue LED coated with a phosphor to make it white. The goal is an ideal white light, because with an ideal white light — which has excellent components of red, green, and blue — the LCD panel’s color filter can effectively carve red, green, and blue out of that white light. For a more in-depth look at the technologies, you can read our guides about QD-OLED and QLED TVs .
2 convicted in human smuggling case after Indian family froze to death on US-Canada border
The Delhi High Court has raised serious concerns about the state of civic administration in the capital, criticizing authorities for failing to address the city's urgent infrastructure needs. The court described the civic administration as having "collapsed" and pointed out that the political class is more focused on "selling slogans" than addressing the city's expanding infrastructure problems. The bench, consisting of Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Manmeet PS Arora, made these observations while hearing a case regarding the eviction of residents from Madrasi Camp, a slum area in the Old Barapullah Bridge locality. The Infrastructure Crisis A central concern brought up by the bench was the gaps between the city’s population and its infrastructure. With a population surpassing 3.3 crore, Delhi's infrastructure is struggling to keep pace with its growth. The court questioned whether the city's infrastructure could accommodate this vast population and stressed the need for major investments in areas like housing, transport, and sanitation. The judges pointed out that the current administration has failed to provide enough infrastructure which is necessary for a city of Delhi’s size and scale. "Can the infrastructure of Delhi accommodate 3.3 crore people?" the court asked. Without proper development plans or a clear growth strategy, the quality of life for Delhi’s residents continues to worsen. In addition to the general lack of infrastructure investment, the court pointed out that Delhi's governance has been marked by frequent crises, including droughts, floods, and pollution. It mentioned how the city struggled this year with severe droughts, followed by floods and extreme air pollution, all of which have put even more pressure on the already weak infrastructure. The Diversion of Focus Another significant point raised by the Delhi High Court was the political establishment's emphasis on short-term solutions like freebies instead of addressing the city's long-term infrastructure needs. The bench criticized politicians for focusing on offering free services, such as water and electricity, rather than prioritizing the city's infrastructure development. "Freebies will not build infrastructure," the bench remarked, emphasizing that while such policies may win votes, they do nothing to solve the city's infrastructure issues. According to the court, politicians are more focused on "selling slogans" than on doing the hard work required to solve the city’s challenges. The Burden on the Judiciary The Delhi High Court also expressed concern about the increasing burden placed on the judiciary due to the failure of the civic administration. The bench noted that the inefficiency of the administrative bodies had resulted in the courts becoming involved in issues that should have been handled by the government. "We have an inefficient system where organizations are working in silos. The entire load is now on the judiciary. This is not our job," the judges remarked. This comment underscores the extent to which the courts have been forced to intervene in matters like unauthorized constructions, drainage issues, and the eviction of residents in slum areas—tasks that should ideally fall under the purview of local authorities. The court criticized the Delhi government for failing to act on time and allowing the situation to deteriorate to the point where judicial intervention is necessary. In this case, the court was hearing the plea of residents from Madrasi Camp, who were facing eviction without proper rehabilitation plans in place. The judges pointed out that delays in resolving such matters were a direct consequence of the government’s inefficiency. Case of Madrasi Camp Eviction The immediate case being heard by the Delhi High Court concerns the eviction of residents from Madrasi Camp, located near the Old Barapullah Bridge. In September, the Delhi government issued eviction notices, asking the residents to vacate the area for the construction of a new flyover. However, the residents, who have lived in the area for more than 50 years, have sought an alternative rehabilitation site, claiming that they cannot be displaced without proper compensation or relocation. The court expressed its dissatisfaction with the delay in the rehabilitation process. While advising the residents to vacate the area and seek alternative accommodations, the court also emphasized that the authorities had failed to meet deadlines set for the rehabilitation process. The deadline for conducting a survey of eligible residents for rehabilitation was set for November 20, but the authorities failed to meet this timeline. The bench warned that if the authorities did not comply with deadlines, strict action would be taken. "You can’t take us for a ride," the court stated, expressing frustration over the repeated breaches of timelines. The judges made it clear that no further extensions would be granted and that failure to comply would lead to serious consequences. Consequences for Delayed Action The court’s frustration was further evident as it warned that the failure of the authorities to act promptly would result in consequences. The judges noted that the current state of affairs in Delhi had led to a "collapsed" civic administration, and the political class had failed to meet its responsibilities. If the authorities continue to miss deadlines and neglect their duties, the court made it clear that it would take further steps to hold them accountable. The court also referenced Section 56(J) of the Central Civil Services (CCS) Pension Rules, 1972, which allows for the premature retirement of incompetent government officials. The bench warned that if the authorities continued to be inefficient, the court would not hesitate to invoke this rule. The consequences of inaction are severe, as delays in fixing infrastructure and rehabilitation problems worsen living conditions for marginalized communities. For residents like those in Madrasi Camp, the lack of proper planning and timely action from authorities makes them vulnerable to displacement without sufficient support or relocation options. Delhi High Court's comments highlight a growing crisis in the city's administration. The court expressed frustration with the political class focusing on short-term policies and the inefficiency of civic administration. The city is in an urgent need for long-term solutions to infrastructural problems. As the city faces rapid growth, it is crucial for the government and political leaders to committedly focus on sustainable development and infrastructure investment. Without such a shift, Delhi may continue to face escalating crises that impact its residents’ quality of life and long-term viability. The court's intervention serves as a critical reminder to the authorities to take responsibility for the city's future, addressing its challenges with urgency, planning, and a commitment to the well-being of all residents.
1,200 baby boomers told us what they regret about investing for retirement
(All times Eastern) Schedule subject to change and/or blackouts Monday, Dec. 23 COLLEGE BASKETBALL (MEN’S) 5:30 p.m. ESPNU — Diamond Head Classic: TBD, Consolation Semifinal, Honolulu 7 p.m. SECN — MTSU at Tennessee 8 p.m. ESPNU — Diamond Head Classic: TBD, Semifinal, Honolulu 10 p.m. BTN — Seattle at Washington 10:30 p.m. ESPN2 — Diamond Head Classic: TBD, Semifinal, Honolulu 12:30 a.m. (Tuesday) ESPN2 — Diamond Head Classic: TBD, Consolation Semifinal Honolulu COLLEGE FOOTBALL 11 a.m. ESPN — The Myrtle Beach Bowl: Coastal Carolina vs. UTSA, Conway, S.C. 2:30 p.m. ESPN — The Famous Idaho Potato Bowl: N. Illinois vs. Fresno St., Boise, Idaho NBA BASKETBALL 7 p.m. NBATV — San Antonio at Philadelphia 10 p.m. NBATV — Indiana at Golden State NFL FOOTBALL 8:15 p.m. ABC — New Orleans at Green Bay ESPN — New Orleans at Green Bay The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive TV listings provided by LiveSportsOnTV . Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
Anyone pushing for Mississippi to be in the College Football Playoff at this point is either on the payroll of the Southeastern Conference or wants to be at some point in the future. That’s the truth, as plain and simple as it can be after the Rebels choked away the best opportunity in the history of their program Saturday, losing 24-17 at Florida. No SEC championship game. No playoff. No nothin’, other than a New Year’s trip to Orlando or some such place that will force everyone in the program to pretend they’re honored and happy to be there. And given the vaunted name, image and likeness payroll Lane Kiffin had to work with this year, it's nothing less than a massive program-wide choke job. You want to play with the big boys after all these years? Fine, go ahead. But you better take care of business. Instead, Ole Miss messed around and put together one of the most disappointing and confounding seasons they’ve ever had. With all the hype, all the talent, all the momentum behind Kiffin after they dominated Georgia two weeks ago , are you really going to tell me the Rebels couldn’t do better than 5-for-18 on third and fourth down against a Florida team left for dead weeks ago? We can break down all the mistakes Ole Miss made in this game from Kiffin’s hard-headedness in handing the ball to defensive tackle JJ Pegues in short yardage to a missed 34-yard field goal to a muffed punt return that handed Florida three points to quarterback Jaxson Dart refusing to tighten his chin strap. There are a lot of things Kiffin will regret. But the bottom line is pretty straightforward. No team with losses to Florida, LSU and Kentucky should be within a mile of the playoff. And the worst part for Kiffin is that it was so avoidable. Yeah, the SEC is tough. So what? We’re in a new era here with the 12-team playoff. In a league like the SEC, you can survive losses, especially if you also have good wins. There has to be a limit, though. Three is just too many. Florida’s playing well toward the end of the season, but a real playoff team goes into Gainesville and handles a Florida team that just got its sixth win. LSU is a big brand name with lots of talent, but the Tigers are 6-4 and just not very good. Kentucky almost certainly isn’t going to a bowl game. Had any of those three games gone the other way, it would have almost certainly put Ole Miss in the 12-team field. The Georgia win was that valuable, and beating South Carolina 27-3 is one of the more underrated great performances of the season given how good the Gamecocks have been otherwise. And at some point, there will be a three-loss team in the expanded playoff. Maybe even this year. But it shouldn’t be Ole Miss. It can’t be Ole Miss, not when those losses all occurred to average or worse opponents. You have to point the finger at Kiffin. Yes, he’s elevated the Rebels’ program significantly. But for years, his record in the really important games that define seasons has been questionable. After the Georgia win, that narrative was starting to turn. If Ole Miss had simply beaten Florida and Mississippi State, it would have all but locked up its spot. And Kiffin would have been arguably the most important figure in the modern history of Ole Miss football. Maybe he will be one day. But it’s not going to be this year. For Ole Miss to implode and miss the playoff with such a stacked roster, and when most of the hard work had been done, is a crushing disappointment. It’s also a gift to the likes of Indiana and Tennessee. The manner in which the Hoosiers were beaten 38-15 by Ohio State certainly frames their resurgence a bit differently. They didn’t look the part at all and will end the season without any standout wins. But assuming they beat 1-10 Purdue next week, there’s little chance the committee can drop them below Ole Miss. The Vols also stand to benefit from the developments in Gainesville. The first team out this week, according to the committee, they are in much better position heading into next Saturday's game against Vanderbilt. SEC homers will undoubtedly argue that both the Vols and Rebels should be in. Already this week, commissioner Greg Sankey was on social media sharing some strength of schedule data as he begins his public lobbying effort to stack the bracket with SEC teams. And while the SEC is probably the best and deepest conference, you’d have to do a lot of mental gymnastics to conclude that the parity we’ve seen is evidence that it’s stacked with great teams. What’s closer to the truth is that the SEC has several pretty good, but deeply flawed teams, whose inconsistencies tend to show up on the road. The SEC will spend the next couple weeks claiming that the league’s depth means all of them should be in the playoff. The committee shouldn’t — and won’t — fall for it. Sorry, Ole Miss. But you’re out.Germany pledges security inquest into Christmas market attackWant an Extra $1,000 of Dividend Income in 2025? Invest $11,400 in These 3 High-Yield Stocks.India to be among top 10 maritime nations by 2047: Sarbananda Sonowal
Growth investors have seen their fair share of bumps in the road the last few years, with some great businesses they follow being forced to navigate some real challenges. Several of these growth stocks managed their way through and are again delivering meaningful returns. If you have the investment capital and risk appetite to put cash into growth-oriented stocks, now might be a great time to put money into quality companies. As you determine which ones to invest in, it's important to only use cash that you won't soon need for monthly financial obligations and to ensure you thoroughly understand any company you buy before you add it to your basket of investments. Are You Missing The Morning Scoop? Breakfast News delivers it all in a quick, Foolish, and free daily newsletter. Sign Up For Free » With those elements in mind, here are two top growth stocks to consider that look like screaming buys in November. 1. TransMedics Group TransMedics Group (NASDAQ: TMDX) is a medical technology and devices company that focuses on organ transplant therapy for end-stage organ failure patients. The company was founded in 1998, and one of the achievements that the company is most known for is its Organ Care System (OCS). The TransMedics OCS is a device that enables the maintenance and preservation of donor organs from storing to transporting those organs to transplant patients. The device can perform numerous functions, including imitating the temperature of the human body and transmitting nutrients to keep the donor organ healthy. Three types of organs can be preserved and stored in the TransMedics OCS -- lungs, livers, and hearts. The OCS can maintain the health of organs outside of the human body for up to 24 hours in many cases. With traditional cold storage methods that have historically been used to facilitate organ transplants, numerous complications regularly ensue ranging from ischemia to enhanced complications post-transplant. Ischemia is a common issue with organ transplants that occurs when insufficient blood flow to the donor organ causes damage to the tissue that can deteriorate further after the transplant. With the TransMedics OCS, the risk of ischemia is greatly reduced, as is the risk of potential complications. Another integral aspect to TransMedic Group's growth strategy is its logistics business, which even includes an air fleet that it uses to transport donor organs. TransMedics had 18 owned aircraft in its fleet at last count. Management believes that the company is on track to achieve the goal of 10,000 OCS transplant cases per year in the U.S. by 2028. Total revenue in the third quarter of 2024 totaled approximately $109 million, a 64% increase from one year ago. Management noted that this revenue growth was driven by continued adoption of its OCS across all three organs as well as logistics revenue. Where TransMedics Group reported a net loss of $25.4 million one year ago, the recent quarter saw it generate net income of $4.2 million. Management is also forecasting anywhere from 76% to 84% revenue growth in the full year 2024 compared to 2023. Investors who want to become part-owners in an innovative business disrupting the multibillion-dollar global transplant market might want to take a second look at this healthcare stock . 2. Shopify Shopify (NYSE: SHOP) has built an explosive global footprint since the company was first founded nearly two decades ago. The company controls about 10% of the global e-commerce software market and is the largest e-commerce software platform in the U.S. with a market share of roughly 30%. Bear in mind that the U.S. e-commerce market is valued north of $1 trillion. It is the largest e-commerce market in the world second only to China. Shopify's market opportunity is only growing both in its core North American markets and internationally as the global e-commerce industry expands. In the third quarter of 2024, Shopify reported its fifth consecutive quarter of gross merchandise value (GMV) growth, which is the total value of merchandise sold in a given period. Gross payment volume (GPV) is also accelerating at a rapid clip. Its operating income more than doubled in Q3, while revenue growth accelerated 26% year over year to $2.2 billion. Shopify's suite of software and hardware solutions are known for integrations with a wide range of offerings from its global partner ecosystem. However, its own in-house solutions, such as Shopify Payments (a payment processing service for merchants) and Shop Pay (a seamless checkout option for customers) are proving to be key growth drivers. Case in point: The Shopify Payments offering processed $43 billion in GPV in the third quarter of 2024, a whopping 31% increase from one year ago that accounted for 62% of overall GMV. As for Shop Pay, this product offering processed $17 billion in GMV in Q3, a 42% year-over-year increase that comprised 41% of GPV. Shopify remains very profitable, with Q3 operating income soaring 132% to $283 million and net income rising 15% from one year ago to $828 million. It also delivered a 19% free cash flow margin, with total free cash flow exploding 53% year over year to $421 million. While some investors may shy away from e-commerce given the current growth environment, Shopify is proving that it's a comeback kid. It definitely isn't too late to snag some shares that can compound your returns generously over the next five or more years. Don’t miss this second chance at a potentially lucrative opportunity Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you’ll want to hear this. On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a “Double Down” stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you’re worried you’ve already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it’s too late. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you’d have $380,291 !* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $43,278 !* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you’d have $484,003 !* Right now, we’re issuing “Double Down” alerts for three incredible companies, and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon. See 3 “Double Down” stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of November 18, 2024 Rachel Warren has positions in Shopify. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Shopify and TransMedics Group. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy . 2 Hypergrowth Stocks That Are Screaming Buys in November was originally published by The Motley FoolB. Riley initiated coverage on shares of Nayax ( NASDAQ:NYAX – Free Report ) in a research note published on Tuesday, Marketbeat.com reports. The brokerage issued a buy rating and a $38.00 price objective on the stock. B. Riley also issued estimates for Nayax’s Q4 2024 earnings at $0.02 EPS, FY2024 earnings at ($0.17) EPS, FY2025 earnings at $0.57 EPS and FY2026 earnings at $1.30 EPS. NYAX has been the subject of a number of other research reports. Jefferies Financial Group raised shares of Nayax from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating in a research report on Wednesday, October 30th. Barclays raised their price objective on Nayax from $23.00 to $28.00 and gave the company an “equal weight” rating in a report on Tuesday, October 15th. Oppenheimer initiated coverage on Nayax in a report on Tuesday, October 1st. They set a “market perform” rating on the stock. Finally, Keefe, Bruyette & Woods decreased their price target on Nayax from $27.00 to $25.00 and set a “market perform” rating for the company in a research note on Thursday, August 8th. Four equities research analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating, one has given a buy rating and one has assigned a strong buy rating to the stock. Based on data from MarketBeat, Nayax currently has an average rating of “Moderate Buy” and an average target price of $30.00. View Our Latest Report on NYAX Nayax Stock Performance Nayax ( NASDAQ:NYAX – Get Free Report ) last released its earnings results on Tuesday, November 12th. The company reported $0.02 EPS for the quarter, beating the consensus estimate of $0.01 by $0.01. Nayax had a negative return on equity of 7.32% and a negative net margin of 3.62%. The firm had revenue of $83.01 million for the quarter, compared to analysts’ expectations of $88.40 million. During the same quarter in the previous year, the business posted ($0.09) EPS. Equities analysts expect that Nayax will post -0.16 EPS for the current fiscal year. Hedge Funds Weigh In On Nayax Hedge funds and other institutional investors have recently bought and sold shares of the business. Swedbank AB bought a new stake in Nayax in the first quarter valued at approximately $2,620,000. Y.D. More Investments Ltd bought a new stake in Nayax in the 2nd quarter valued at $14,790,000. Allspring Global Investments Holdings LLC acquired a new stake in Nayax during the 2nd quarter valued at $1,673,000. Baillie Gifford & Co. boosted its position in Nayax by 1.2% during the second quarter. Baillie Gifford & Co. now owns 50,086 shares of the company’s stock worth $1,072,000 after purchasing an additional 616 shares during the period. Finally, Assenagon Asset Management S.A. increased its holdings in shares of Nayax by 184.1% in the third quarter. Assenagon Asset Management S.A. now owns 177,874 shares of the company’s stock valued at $4,638,000 after purchasing an additional 115,262 shares during the last quarter. Institutional investors own 34.87% of the company’s stock. Nayax Company Profile ( Get Free Report ) Nayax Ltd., a fintech company, operates system and payment platform for multiple retailers in the United States, Europe, the United Kingdom, Australia, Israel, and rest of the world. The company offers AMIT 3.0, a machine-to-machine vending telemetry solution; Nayax Core, a management and monitoring software for vending machines and other unattended machines; MoMa, a mobile app for unattended machine; Tigapo back-office software suite, a cloud-based platform; EV Core, a smart, cloud-based management platform; Retail Management Cloud, a comprehensive attended retail management platform; Loyalty and Marketing Suite, a consumer engagement marketing and loyalty platform; Monyx Wallet, a digital wallet app enabling cashless payments with mobile phones; Weezmo, a consumer engagement and marketing platform; and Tigapo app, a proprietary mobile app to help family entertainment center businesses. See Also Receive News & Ratings for Nayax Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Nayax and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .