gba 2

gba 2 BREAKING NEWS Biden uses remarks about Jimmy Carter's death to make not-so-subtle dig at Trump By NIKKI SCHWAB, CHIEF CAMPAIGN CORRESPONDENT FOR DAILYMAIL.COM Published: 19:50 EST, 29 December 2024 | Updated: 19:56 EST, 29 December 2024 e-mail 1 View comments President Joe Biden made some not-so-subtle digs at President-elect Donald Trump as he spoke about the life of the late President Jimmy Carter Sunday night from St. Croix. Biden reiterated several times that the 100-year-old Carter stood for 'decency.' 'Can you imagine Jimmy Carter walking by someone who needs something and just keeps walking?' Biden asked. 'Can you imagine Jimmy Carter referring to someone by the way they look or the way they talk?' 'I can't, I can't,' Biden said. During his almost nine years in politics, Trump has frequently made fun of opponents, including the way they look and how they talk. Trump's mimicked Biden's stutter on a number of occasions. Speaking to reporters amid his traditional New Year's vacation in the U.S. Virgin Islands, Biden pressed that Americans would 'do well to try and be a little more like Jimmy Carter' as he alluded to the current state of toxic politics. 'In today's world some look at Jimmy Carter and see a man of a bygone era, with honesty and character, faith and humility... But I don't think it's bygone era. I see a man not only of our time but for all times,' Biden argued. President Joe Biden made some not-so-subtle digs at President-elect Donald Trump as he spoke about the life of the late President Jimmy Carter Sunday night from St. Croix 'Someone who embodied the most fundamental human values we can never let slip away,' Biden continued. 'Although sometimes it seems like it is,' he said as an aside. The president spent nine minutes in front of the cameras, coughing as he got started. He spoke about how Carter was a 'statesman and humanitarian' but also a good friend to Biden and the first lady. 'I've been hanging out with Jimmy Carter for over 50 years it dawned on me,' the 82-year-old president said. 'I've always been proud to say, and he used to kid me about it, that I was the first national figure to endorse him in 1976 when he ran for president,' Biden recalled. Biden had entered the U.S. Senate, at age 30, four years earlier. Politics Joe Biden Donald Trump Share or comment on this article: Biden uses remarks about Jimmy Carter's death to make not-so-subtle dig at Trump e-mail Add commentDiamondbacks acquire Canadian 1st baseman Josh Naylor from Guardians

Arne Slot was relieved to finally get one over Liverpool ’s “pain in the a**” Real Madrid as he exorcised Jurgen Klopp ’s demons. The Reds secured a memorable 2-0 win against the Spanish giants on Wednesday evening. Alexis Mac Allister and Cody Gakpo scored the goals for the hosts, while Mohamed Salah and Kylian Mbappe also missed penalties. The win leaves Liverpool top of the Champions League table with five wins from as many games. It was also the Reds’ first win against Real Madrid in their last seven meetings. Ex-Liverpool boss Klopp never managed to beat the Spanish side during his time at Anfield, a run that includes two Champions League final defeats. And Slot hailed his side for finally ending that tricky run. Speaking after the full-time whistle, the Dutchman said: "You know how special it is to play against a team that has won the Champions League so many times. They were a pain in the a** for Liverpool for many years too. It is a big week, and it is pleasing to see. "I didn't have schedule in terms of amount of points I wanted. You want to implement the playing style as soon as possible. That is not difficult because it wasn't that different to Jurgen's. It is great to see not only the starters but the players coming on are doing as we expect. “If before the season I had counted points for this point in the season I wouldn't have done as much as we have now. Every time Real Madrid threatened us was from us. I think we can play with more intensity and better with the ball." Away from Slot’s verdict, goalscorer Mac Allister was also left delighted. He hailed his teammates for their displays in what was a tricky game against the Spanish giants. Who was Liverpool's man-of-the-match vs Real Madrid? Share your thoughts in the comments below The midfielder said: "When you play against teams like Real Madrid, it is always nice to score – but the most important thing is that we won it – and I think in a really good way. We dominated the game. We needed a couple of times this guy ( Caoimhin Kelleher ) but thank God that he was there and he really deserved it. "When we say in the dressing room, we know players that come in are important to finish the games, and you know if you want to win trophies, you need them. Everyone does the best for the team." Liverpool face another difficult game this weekend as they come up against Pep Guardiola ’s Manchester City . The Reds could potentially extend their lead at the top of the Premier League table to 11 points with a win. Join our new WhatsApp community and receive your daily dose of Mirror Football content. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Sky has slashed the price of its Sky Sports, Sky Stream, Sky TV and Netflix bundle in an unbeatable new deal that saves £240 and includes 1,400 live matches across the Premier League, EFL and more.

ATLANTA — Jimmy Carter, the peanut farmer who won the presidency in the wake of the Watergate scandal and Vietnam War, endured humbling defeat after one tumultuous term and then redefined life after the White House as a global humanitarian, has died. He was 100 years old. The longest-lived American president died on Sunday, more than a year after entering hospice care , at his home in the small town of Plains, Georgia, where he and his wife, Rosalynn, who died at 96 in November 2023 , spent most of their lives, The Carter Center said. “Our founder, former U.S. President Jimmy Carter, passed away this afternoon in Plains, Georgia,” the center said on the social media platform X. It added in a statement that he died peacefully, surrounded by his family. As reaction poured in from around the world, President Joe Biden mourned Carter’s death, saying the world lost an “extraordinary leader, statesman and humanitarian” and he lost a dear friend. Biden cited Carter’s compassion and moral clarity, his work to eradicate disease, forge peace, advance civil and human rights, promote free and fair elections, house the homeless and advocacy for the disadvantaged as an example for others. “To all of the young people in this nation and for anyone in search of what it means to live a life of purpose and meaning – the good life – study Jimmy Carter, a man of principle, faith, and humility,” Biden said in a statement. “He showed that we are a great nation because we are a good people – decent and honorable, courageous and compassionate, humble and strong.” Biden said he is ordering a state funeral for Carter in Washington. Businessman, Navy officer, evangelist, politician, negotiator, author, woodworker, citizen of the world — Carter forged a path that still challenges political assumptions and stands out among the 45 men who reached the nation’s highest office. The 39th president leveraged his ambition with a keen intellect, deep religious faith and prodigious work ethic, conducting diplomatic missions into his 80s and building houses for the poor well into his 90s. “My faith demands — this is not optional — my faith demands that I do whatever I can, wherever I am, whenever I can, for as long as I can, with whatever I have to try to make a difference,” Carter once said. A moderate Democrat, Carter entered the 1976 presidential race as a little-known Georgia governor with a broad smile, outspoken Baptist mores and technocratic plans reflecting his education as an engineer. His no-frills campaign depended on public financing, and his promise not to deceive the American people resonated after Richard Nixon’s disgrace and U.S. defeat in southeast Asia. “If I ever lie to you, if I ever make a misleading statement, don’t vote for me. I would not deserve to be your president,” Carter repeated before narrowly beating Republican incumbent Gerald Ford, who had lost popularity pardoning Nixon. Carter governed amid Cold War pressures, turbulent oil markets and social upheaval over racism, women’s rights and America’s global role. His most acclaimed achievement in office was a Mideast peace deal that he brokered by keeping Egyptian President Anwar Sadat and Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin at the bargaining table for 13 days in 1978. That Camp David experience inspired the post-presidential center where Carter would establish so much of his legacy. Yet Carter’s electoral coalition splintered under double-digit inflation, gasoline lines and the 444-day hostage crisis in Iran. His bleakest hour came when eight Americans died in a failed hostage rescue in April 1980, helping to ensure his landslide defeat to Republican Ronald Reagan. Carter acknowledged in his 2020 “White House Diary” that he could be “micromanaging” and “excessively autocratic,” complicating dealings with Congress and the federal bureaucracy. He also turned a cold shoulder to Washington’s news media and lobbyists, not fully appreciating their influence on his political fortunes. “It didn’t take us long to realize that the underestimation existed, but by that time we were not able to repair the mistake,” Carter told historians in 1982, suggesting that he had “an inherent incompatibility” with Washington insiders. Carter insisted his overall approach was sound and that he achieved his primary objectives — to “protect our nation’s security and interests peacefully” and “enhance human rights here and abroad” — even if he fell spectacularly short of a second term. Ignominious defeat, though, allowed for renewal. The Carters founded The Carter Center in 1982 as a first-of-its-kind base of operations, asserting themselves as international peacemakers and champions of democracy, public health and human rights. “I was not interested in just building a museum or storing my White House records and memorabilia,” Carter wrote in a memoir published after his 90th birthday. “I wanted a place where we could work.” That work included easing nuclear tensions in North and South Korea, helping to avert a U.S. invasion of Haiti and negotiating cease-fires in Bosnia and Sudan. By 2022, The Carter Center had declared at least 113 elections in Latin America, Asia and Africa to be free or fraudulent. Recently, the center began monitoring U.S. elections as well. Carter’s stubborn self-assuredness and even self-righteousness proved effective once he was unencumbered by the Washington order, sometimes to the point of frustrating his successors . He went “where others are not treading,” he said, to places like Ethiopia, Liberia and North Korea, where he secured the release of an American who had wandered across the border in 2010. “I can say what I like. I can meet whom I want. I can take on projects that please me and reject the ones that don’t,” Carter said. He announced an arms-reduction-for-aid deal with North Korea without clearing the details with Bill Clinton’s White House. He openly criticized President George W. Bush for the 2003 invasion of Iraq. He also criticized America’s approach to Israel with his 2006 book “Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid.” And he repeatedly countered U.S. administrations by insisting North Korea should be included in international affairs, a position that most aligned Carter with Republican President Donald Trump. Among the center’s many public health initiatives, Carter vowed to eradicate the guinea worm parasite during his lifetime, and nearly achieved it: Cases dropped from millions in the 1980s to nearly a handful. With hardhats and hammers, the Carters also built homes with Habitat for Humanity. The Nobel committee’s 2002 Peace Prize cites his “untiring effort to find peaceful solutions to international conflicts, to advance democracy and human rights, and to promote economic and social development.” Carter should have won it alongside Sadat and Begin in 1978, the chairman added. Carter accepted the recognition saying there was more work to be done. “The world is now, in many ways, a more dangerous place,” he said. “The greater ease of travel and communication has not been matched by equal understanding and mutual respect.” Carter’s globetrotting took him to remote villages where he met little “Jimmy Carters,” so named by admiring parents. But he spent most of his days in the same one-story Plains house — expanded and guarded by Secret Service agents — where they lived before he became governor. He regularly taught Sunday School lessons at Maranatha Baptist Church until his mobility declined and the coronavirus pandemic raged. Those sessions drew visitors from around the world to the small sanctuary where Carter will receive his final send-off after a state funeral at Washington’s National Cathedral. The common assessment that he was a better ex-president than president rankled Carter and his allies. His prolific post-presidency gave him a brand above politics, particularly for Americans too young to witness him in office. But Carter also lived long enough to see biographers and historians reassess his White House years more generously. His record includes the deregulation of key industries, reduction of U.S. dependence on foreign oil, cautious management of the national debt and notable legislation on the environment, education and mental health. He focused on human rights in foreign policy, pressuring dictators to release thousands of political prisoners . He acknowledged America’s historical imperialism, pardoned Vietnam War draft evaders and relinquished control of the Panama Canal. He normalized relations with China. “I am not nominating Jimmy Carter for a place on Mount Rushmore,” Stuart Eizenstat, Carter’s domestic policy director, wrote in a 2018 book. “He was not a great president” but also not the “hapless and weak” caricature voters rejected in 1980, Eizenstat said. Rather, Carter was “good and productive” and “delivered results, many of which were realized only after he left office.” Madeleine Albright, a national security staffer for Carter and Clinton’s secretary of state, wrote in Eizenstat’s forward that Carter was “consequential and successful” and expressed hope that “perceptions will continue to evolve” about his presidency. “Our country was lucky to have him as our leader,” said Albright, who died in 2022. Jonathan Alter, who penned a comprehensive Carter biography published in 2020, said in an interview that Carter should be remembered for “an epic American life” spanning from a humble start in a home with no electricity or indoor plumbing through decades on the world stage across two centuries. “He will likely go down as one of the most misunderstood and underestimated figures in American history,” Alter told The Associated Press. James Earl Carter Jr. was born Oct. 1, 1924, in Plains and spent his early years in nearby Archery. His family was a minority in the mostly Black community, decades before the civil rights movement played out at the dawn of Carter’s political career. Carter, who campaigned as a moderate on race relations but governed more progressively, talked often of the influence of his Black caregivers and playmates but also noted his advantages: His land-owning father sat atop Archery’s tenant-farming system and owned a main street grocery. His mother, Lillian , would become a staple of his political campaigns. Seeking to broaden his world beyond Plains and its population of fewer than 1,000 — then and now — Carter won an appointment to the U.S. Naval Academy, graduating in 1946. That same year he married Rosalynn Smith, another Plains native, a decision he considered more important than any he made as head of state. She shared his desire to see the world, sacrificing college to support his Navy career. Carter climbed in rank to lieutenant, but then his father was diagnosed with cancer, so the submarine officer set aside his ambitions of admiralty and moved the family back to Plains. His decision angered Rosalynn, even as she dived into the peanut business alongside her husband. Carter again failed to talk with his wife before his first run for office — he later called it “inconceivable” not to have consulted her on such major life decisions — but this time, she was on board. “My wife is much more political,” Carter told the AP in 2021. He won a state Senate seat in 1962 but wasn’t long for the General Assembly and its back-slapping, deal-cutting ways. He ran for governor in 1966 — losing to arch-segregationist Lester Maddox — and then immediately focused on the next campaign. Carter had spoken out against church segregation as a Baptist deacon and opposed racist “Dixiecrats” as a state senator. Yet as a local school board leader in the 1950s he had not pushed to end school segregation even after the Supreme Court’s Brown v. Board of Education decision, despite his private support for integration. And in 1970, Carter ran for governor again as the more conservative Democrat against Carl Sanders, a wealthy businessman Carter mocked as “Cufflinks Carl.” Sanders never forgave him for anonymous, race-baiting flyers, which Carter disavowed. Ultimately, Carter won his races by attracting both Black voters and culturally conservative whites. Once in office, he was more direct. “I say to you quite frankly that the time for racial discrimination is over,” he declared in his 1971 inaugural address, setting a new standard for Southern governors that landed him on the cover of Time magazine. His statehouse initiatives included environmental protection, boosting rural education and overhauling antiquated executive branch structures. He proclaimed Martin Luther King Jr. Day in the slain civil rights leader’s home state. And he decided, as he received presidential candidates in 1972, that they were no more talented than he was. In 1974, he ran Democrats’ national campaign arm. Then he declared his own candidacy for 1976. An Atlanta newspaper responded with the headline: “Jimmy Who?” The Carters and a “Peanut Brigade” of family members and Georgia supporters camped out in Iowa and New Hampshire, establishing both states as presidential proving grounds. His first Senate endorsement: a young first-termer from Delaware named Joe Biden. Yet it was Carter’s ability to navigate America’s complex racial and rural politics that cemented the nomination. He swept the Deep South that November, the last Democrat to do so, as many white Southerners shifted to Republicans in response to civil rights initiatives. A self-declared “born-again Christian,” Carter drew snickers by referring to Scripture in a Playboy magazine interview, saying he “had looked on many women with lust. I’ve committed adultery in my heart many times.” The remarks gave Ford a new foothold and television comedians pounced — including NBC’s new “Saturday Night Live” show. But voters weary of cynicism in politics found it endearing. Carter chose Minnesota Sen. Walter “Fritz” Mondale as his running mate on a “Grits and Fritz” ticket. In office, he elevated the vice presidency and the first lady’s office. Mondale’s governing partnership was a model for influential successors Al Gore, Dick Cheney and Biden. Rosalynn Carter was one of the most involved presidential spouses in history, welcomed into Cabinet meetings and huddles with lawmakers and top aides. The Carters presided with uncommon informality: He used his nickname “Jimmy” even when taking the oath of office, carried his own luggage and tried to silence the Marine Band’s “Hail to the Chief.” They bought their clothes off the rack. Carter wore a cardigan for a White House address, urging Americans to conserve energy by turning down their thermostats. Amy, the youngest of four children, attended District of Columbia public school. Washington’s social and media elite scorned their style. But the larger concern was that “he hated politics,” according to Eizenstat, leaving him nowhere to turn politically once economic turmoil and foreign policy challenges took their toll. Carter partially deregulated the airline, railroad and trucking industries and established the departments of Education and Energy, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency. He designated millions of acres of Alaska as national parks or wildlife refuges. He appointed a then-record number of women and nonwhite people to federal posts. He never had a Supreme Court nomination, but he elevated civil rights attorney Ruth Bader Ginsburg to the nation’s second highest court, positioning her for a promotion in 1993. He appointed Paul Volker, the Federal Reserve chairman whose policies would help the economy boom in the 1980s — after Carter left office. He built on Nixon’s opening with China, and though he tolerated autocrats in Asia, pushed Latin America from dictatorships to democracy. But he couldn’t immediately tame inflation or the related energy crisis. And then came Iran. After he admitted the exiled Shah of Iran to the U.S. for medical treatment, the American Embassy in Tehran was overrun in 1979 by followers of the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. Negotiations to free the hostages broke down repeatedly ahead of the failed rescue attempt. The same year, Carter signed SALT II, the new strategic arms treaty with Leonid Brezhnev of the Soviet Union, only to pull it back, impose trade sanctions and order a U.S. boycott of the Moscow Olympics after the Soviets invaded Afghanistan. Hoping to instill optimism, he delivered what the media dubbed his “malaise” speech, although he didn’t use that word. He declared the nation was suffering “a crisis of confidence.” By then, many Americans had lost confidence in the president, not themselves. Carter campaigned sparingly for reelection because of the hostage crisis, instead sending Rosalynn as Sen. Edward M. Kennedy challenged him for the Democratic nomination. Carter famously said he’d “kick his ass,” but was hobbled by Kennedy as Reagan rallied a broad coalition with “make America great again” appeals and asking voters whether they were “better off than you were four years ago.” Reagan further capitalized on Carter’s lecturing tone, eviscerating him in their lone fall debate with the quip: “There you go again.” Carter lost all but six states and Republicans rolled to a new Senate majority. Carter successfully negotiated the hostages’ freedom after the election, but in one final, bitter turn of events, Tehran waited until hours after Carter left office to let them walk free. At 56, Carter returned to Georgia with “no idea what I would do with the rest of my life.” Four decades after launching The Carter Center, he still talked of unfinished business. “I thought when we got into politics we would have resolved everything,” Carter told the AP in 2021. “But it’s turned out to be much more long-lasting and insidious than I had thought it was. I think in general, the world itself is much more divided than in previous years.” Still, he affirmed what he said when he underwent treatment for a cancer diagnosis in his 10th decade of life. “I’m perfectly at ease with whatever comes,” he said in 2015 . “I’ve had a wonderful life. I’ve had thousands of friends, I’ve had an exciting, adventurous and gratifying existence.”Falcons visit Vikings as a struggling Cousins returns to old home to find a thriving DarnoldColts coach Shane Steichen feeling heat after playoff elimination

The Swans stunned Pride Park into silence with less than two minutes on the clock. Swansea boss Luke Williams thought his side were second best for the majority of the contest despite earning a 2-1 win at Derby. The Swans stunned Pride Park into silence with less than two minutes on the clock when Zan Vipotnik sent a bullet past Jacob Widell Zetterstrom before Ronald slotted home his first of the season in the 14th minute. Cyrus Christie brought Tom Barkhuizen down inside the box and Nathaniel Mendez-Laing dispatched the resulting penalty to cut the deficit in half and, despite piling on the pressure, Derby succumbed to a second home defeat of the season. Williams told a press conference: “We started the game very well, we were good up until we scored the second goal then we lost the grip on the game and I thought Derby were the better team. “The next thing for us we have to be able to maintain that level throughout the game and we weren’t able to do that to be quite honest today. “They made it difficult, reacted very well after the second goal and didn’t go under, far from it.” Swansea leapfrogged their opponents into the top half of the table with their sixth win of the season and took three points back to south Wales following two last-minute defeats by Burnley and Leeds heading into the match. Williams added: “We’ve recently conceded late goals but they’re a very resilient group and we saw it out in the end. “We’ve dominated games a lot but probably failed to score when we’ve been that dominant and tonight we managed to score the goals when we were dominant. “We scored the goals at the right time today.” Derby had been unbeaten in their last three matches coming into this one but Paul Warne put defeat down to a poor start. He said: “We conceded two and didn’t get close enough, weren’t aggressive enough, not enough body contact and looked soft, that’s my fault. “Maybe I didn’t message it properly. Sometimes it doesn’t come down to shape and tactics but I thought that was what the difference was. “Credit Swansea for the win but after the 25 mins it looked like we would score. I really enjoyed it, that’s the truth. I had 70 minutes of a team giving everything, I don’t think we’ve had that many attempts in the Championship this season. “It’s a rude awakening, last year we would’ve won that 4-2.”

NEW YORK — A number of President-elect Donald Trump 's most prominent Cabinet picks and appointees have been targeted by bomb threats and “swatting attacks," Trump's transition team said Wednesday. The FBI said it was investigating. “Last night and this morning, several of President Trump’s Cabinet nominees and Administration appointees were targeted in violent, unAmerican threats to their lives and those who live with them," Trump transition spokesperson Karoline Leavitt said in a statement. The attacks ranged from bomb threats to swatting, in which attackers initiate an emergency law enforcement response against a target victim under false pretenses, she said. The tactic has become a popular one in recent years. Leavitt said law enforcement and other authorities acted quickly to ensure the safety of those who were targeted and Trump and his transition team are grateful. Among those targeted were New York Rep. Elise Stefanik, Trump’s pick to serve as the next ambassador to the United Nations ; Matt Gaetz, Trump’s initial pick to serve as attorney general ; Oregon Rep. Lori Chavez-DeRemer, whom Trump chose to lead the Department of Labor , and former New York congressman Lee Zeldin, who has been tapped to lead the Environmental Protection Agency. Law enforcement officials are also looking into whether Susie Wiles, Trump’s incoming chief of staff, and Pam Bondi, the former Florida attorney general whom Trump has chosen as Gaetz’s replacement, and other incoming administration officials were also victims — as well as how each was targeted, according to a law enforcement official who spoke on condition of anonymity as the investigation continues. Wiles and Bondi did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The FBI said in a statement that it was “aware of numerous bomb threats and swatting incidents targeting incoming administration nominees and appointees" and was investigating with its law enforcement partners. White House spokesperson Saloni Sharma said President Joe Biden had been briefed and the White House is in touch with federal law enforcement and Trump's transition team. Biden “continues to monitor the situation closely," Sharma said, adding the president and his administration “condemn threats of political violence.” Stefanik's office said that, on Wednesday morning, she, her husband, and their 3-year-old son were driving home from Washington for Thanksgiving when they were informed of a bomb threat to their residence in Saratoga County. Police swept Stefanik’s home on Wednesday morning in response to the bomb threat but did not locate any explosive devices, New York State Police said. Zeldin said in a social media post that he and his family had also been threatened. “A pipe bomb threat targeting me and my family at our home today was sent in with a pro-Palestinian themed message,” he wrote on X . “My family and I were not home at the time and are safe." In Florida, the Okaloosa County sheriff’s office said on Facebook that it “received notification of a bomb threat referencing former Congressman Matt Gaetz’s supposed mailbox at a home in the Niceville area" Wednesday. While a family member resides at the address, the office said, Gaetz “is NOT a resident.” No threatening devices were found. Gaetz was Trump’s initial pick to serve as attorney general, but he withdrew from consideration after allegations that he paid women for sex and slept with underage women. Gaetz has vehemently denied any wrongdoing, and a Justice Department investigation into sex trafficking allegations ended with no charges against him. The threats follow a political campaign marked by disturbing and unprecedented violence. In July, a gunman opened fire at a Trump rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, grazing the then-candidate in the ear with a bullet and killing one of his supporters. The Secret Service later thwarted a subsequent assassination attempt at Trump's West Palm Beach, Florida, golf course when an agent spotted the barrel of a gun poking through a perimeter fence while Trump was golfing. Trump was also the subject of an Iranian murder-for-hire plot , with a man saying he had been tasked with planning the assassination of the Republican president-elect. Also this week, authorities arrested a man they say posted videos on social media threatening to kill Trump, according to court documents. In one video posted on Nov. 13, Manuel Tamayo-Torres threatened to shoot the former president while holding what appeared to be an AR-15 style rifle, authorities said Among the other videos he posted was one from an arena in Glendale, Arizona on Aug. 23, the same day Trump held a campaign rally there, according to court papers. An attorney for Tamayo-Torres did not immediately respond to a request for comment Wednesday. Public figures across the political spectrum have been targeted in recent years by hoax bomb threats and false reports of shootings at their homes. About a year ago the FBI responded to an uptick in such incidents at the homes of public officials, state capitols and courthouses across the country around the holidays. Many were locked down and evacuated in early January after receiving bomb threats. No explosives were found and no one was hurt. Some of those targeted last year were Georgia Lt. Gov. Burt Jones, Boston Mayor Michelle Wu and Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost. The judges overseeing the civil fraud case against Trump in New York and the criminal election interference case against him in Washington were both targeted earlier this year. Justice Department special counsel Jack Smith, who recently abandoned the two criminal cases he brought against Trump, was also the subject of a fake emergency call on Christmas Day last year. Earlier this year, schools, government buildings and the homes of city officials in Springfield, Ohio, received a string of hoax bomb threats after Trump falsely accused members of Springfield’s Haitian community of abducting and eating cats and dogs. And in 2022, a slew of historically Black colleges and universities nationwide were targeted with dozens of bomb threats, with the vast majority arriving during the celebration of Black History Month. The U.S. Capitol Police said in a statement Wednesday that anytime a member of Congress is the victim of a swatting' incident, “we work closely with our local and federal law enforcement partners.” The force declined to provide further details, in part to “minimize the risk of copy-cats.” Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson called the threats “dangerous and unhinged.” “This year, there was not just one but TWO assassination attempts on President Trump," he wrote on X . “Now some of his Cabinet nominees and their families are facing bomb threats.” He added: “It is not who we are in America.” ___ Richer reported from Washington. Associated Press writers Colleen Long and Eric Tucker in Washington, Scott Bauer in Madison, Wisconsin, and Anthony Izaguirre in Albany, New York, contributed to this report.

EDITOR’S NOTE -- President Joe Biden and first lady Jill Biden will be in Fort Wadsworth for a Friendsgiving dinner Monday evening with service members and their families at the U.S. Coast Guard Sector New York at the base. For the latest coverage, including information on Father Capodanno Boulevard road closures, visit here. ------------- President Joe Biden is pictured with John Zimmerman, chair of the National Turkey Federation, from left, and Zimmerman's son Grant, after pardoning the national Thanksgiving turkey Peach during a ceremony on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, Monday, Nov. 25, 2024. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein) AP AP WASHINGTON — President Joe Biden kicked off his final holiday season at the White House on Monday by issuing the traditional reprieve to two turkeys who will bypass the Thanksgiving table to live out their days in southern Minnesota. The 82-year-old president welcomed 2,500 guests to the South Lawn under sunny skies as he cracked jokes about the fates of “Peach” and “Blossom” and sounded wistful tones about the last weeks of his presidency after a half-century in Washington power circles. “It’s been the honor of my life. I’m forever grateful,” Biden said, taking note of his impending departure on Jan. 20, 2025. That’s when power will transfer to Republican President-elect Donald Trump, the man that Biden defeated four years ago and was battling again until he was pressured to bow out of the race amid concerns about his age and viability. Until Inauguration Day, the president and first lady Jill Biden will continue a busy run of festivities that will double as their long goodbye. The White House schedule in December is replete with holiday parties for various constituencies, from West Wing staff to members of Congress and the White House press corps. Biden relished the brief ceremony with the pardoned turkeys, named for the official flower of the president’s home state of Delaware. “The peach pie in my state is one of my favorites,” he said during remarks that were occasionally interrupted by Peach gobbling atop the table to Biden’s right. “Peach is making a last-minute plea,” Biden said at one point, drawing laughter from an overflow crowd that included Cabinet members, White House staff and their families, and students from 4H programs and Future Farmers of America chapters. Biden introduced Peach as a bird who “lives by the motto, ‘Keep calm and gobble on.’” Blossom, the president said, has a different motto: “No fowl play. Just Minnesota nice.” Peach and Blossom came from the farm of John Zimmerman, near the southern Minnesota city of Northfield. Zimmerman, who has raised about 4 million turkeys, is president of the National Turkey Federation, the group that has gifted U.S. presidents Thanksgiving turkeys since the Truman administration after World War II. President Harry Truman, however, preferred to eat the birds. Official pardon ceremonies did not become an annual White House tradition until the administration of President George H.W. Bush in 1989. With their presidential reprieve, Peach and Blossom will live out their days at Farmamerica, an agriculture interpretative center near Waseca in southern Minnesota. The center’s aim is to promote agriculture and educate future farmers and others about agriculture in America. Later Monday, first lady Jill Biden will receive delivery of the official White House Christmas tree that will be on display in the Blue Room. Then the Bidens will travel to New York City for an evening “Friendsgiving” event at a Coast Guard station on Staten Island. Biden began his valedictory calendar Friday night with a gala for hundreds of his friends, supporters and staff members who gathered in a pavilion erected on the South Lawn, with a view out to the Lincoln Memorial. Cabinet secretaries, Democratic donors and his longest-serving staff members came together to hear from the president and pay tribute, with no evidence that Biden was effectively forced from the Democratic ticket this summer and watched Vice President Kamala Harris suffer defeat on Nov. 5. RECOMMENDED • silive .com Donald Trump names new U.S. attorney general nominee Nov. 21, 2024, 7:03 p.m. As Thanksgiving approaches, USDA offers tips for safe food handling practices Nov. 25, 2024, 8:00 a.m. “I’m so proud that we’ve done all of this with a deep belief in the core values of America,” said Biden, sporting a tuxedo for the black-tie event. Setting aside his criticisms of Trump as a fundamental threat to democracy, Biden added his characteristic national cheerleading: “I fully believe that America is better positioned to lead the world today than at any point in my 50 years of public service.” The first lady toasted her husband with a nod to his 2020 campaign promise to “restore the soul of the nation,” in Trump’s aftermath. With the results on Election Day, however, Biden’s four years now become sandwiched in the middle of an era dominated by Trump’s presence on the national stage and in the White House. Even as the first couple avoided the context surrounding the president’s coming exit, those political realities were nonetheless apparent, as younger Democrats like Maryland Gov. Wes Moore , Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker and Biden’s Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg not only raised their glasses to the president but held forth with many attendees who could remain in the party’s power circles in the 2028 election cycle and beyond.Former Vikings Cornerback Claimed by PanthersFormula 1 expands grid to add General Motors' Cadillac brand and new American team for 2026 season

Peter Howe Sliding door moments are as true in sport as in everyday life, just ask this month’s Don Deeble nominee, Astin Hewett. He won a scholarship to Maribyrnong Sports Academy for football and he was focused on that dream. After all, his extended family connections had made AFL lists and he was playing in the Coates Talent League with the Western Jets. Life was a dream, his targets had been set. Hewett started Auskick when he was five and played with Point Cook Centrals until under-16s with top five Western Football League best and fairest finishes along the way. He moved to Keilor to play under former AFL star Mick McGuane and made it to the Jets. While at MSA, he was introduced to another sport, gridiron. “I was big for my age and adapted to the skills required to play easily,” he said. “There was no sport played in 2020 or 2021. “Gridiron was a summer sport in Victoria but overlapped with the start of the AFL season.” Hewett joined the Western Crusaders powerhouse gridiron team late in 2021 having found a love for the sport. “I was still invested in AFL but this new sport was intoxicating,” Hewett reflected. “Western Jets season started in 2022 at the same time the gridiron season was entering finals. “I chose the Jets, the Crusaders lost their semi final after having a great season.” While he chose the Jets, Hewett still decided to try out for the Victorian under-19 gridiron team at the end of 2022. He was unsuccessful but it fuelled a fire within him and his focus became, “I must work harder”. “The gridiron season 2022-2023 was the most fun I ever had playing team sport,” he said. “Our under-16 team dominated the season.” Hewett was named in the Gridiron Victorian team in 2023 and then later in 2024. Still not sure which sport was for him, Hewett played three games for the Jets in 2023 as a tall defender and by his own admission they weren’t great. After his best pre-season, it ended quickly when he broke his finger in round three. “Then through a series of mishaps and a further stress fracture of my foot I was unable to get back into training properly and missed the remainder of the season,” he said. The two injuries meant that Hewett couldn’t start running until April the following year. Confined to walking only, he decided to put up his hand for Australian Outback gridiron under-20 selection. “I was full disclosure to my coaches [on my injuries],” he said. “In the two days of tryouts I completed all of the off field coaching but just threw the ball on field. “The coaches had seen enough. I made the Australian team.” Hewett was the second youngest in the team and one of the two quarterbacks chosen. “I was given the all clear to train,” he said of the lead up. “I spent four days a week in the gym undergoing a strength and conditioning program to get into the best physical condition I could. Throwing practice was held every Saturday.” The Australian Outback gridiron team landed in Canada in June to play in the IFAF World Championships. Hewett was named captain and starting quarterback. “It was an amazing experience,” he said. “Unfortunately, we only won one of our three games, but it was the first time an Australian team had won a game in a tournament for many years.” Hewett said he’s a dual threat on the field and describes himself as a leader who leads by example. He tries to set the standards and it’s afraid to hold his teammates to account. Having decided to focus on just gridiron, Hewett is keen for what the future holds. “I have just finished my last year 12 exam and hope to be offered a place in the Deakin University sports science course,” he said. “USA College football would be amazing but let’s see how that all unfolds.” The Don Deeble Sports Star Award is sponsored by the Yarraville Club Cricket Club, Strathmore Community Bank, the Deer Park Club, Ascot Vale Sports and Trophies and Star Weekly Newspapers. If you would like to nominate a monthly winner or attend a dinner, contact at or 0408 556 631.The sweeping victory of the National People’s Power (NPP) in Sri Lanka’s recent elections marked a resounding call for change, as voters across the nation—from north to south and east to west—rejected corrupt political elitism in favour of a new, principled political culture. The scale of this victory, surpassing all predictions, demonstrated the people’s overwhelming desire for a transformation in governance, as clearly reflected in the election results, particularly the postal votes. President Anura Kumara Dissanayake, during his address at the swearing-in of the new Cabinet, emphasised a critical shift: the transition from articulating political slogans in Opposition to the responsibility of implementing them through effective governance. He cautioned that the success of the NPP would now depend on delivering on its promises, as slogans alone would no longer resonate with the public. The formation of the NPP’s maiden Cabinet on 18 November sparked widespread discussion, particularly concerning the absence of a Muslim representative. While many celebrated the Cabinet’s adherence to meritocracy and principles, some expressed dissatisfaction, especially on social media, which had been a key platform for NPP’s success. The criticism appears to stem from two distinct groups: Opportunists: These include individuals, both Muslim and non-Muslim, who opposed the NPP during the elections and now seek to exploit the absence of a Muslim minister to discredit the new Government. Emotionally driven advocates: These are well-meaning individuals, including NPP supporters and non-supporters alike, who view the absence of Muslim representation as a failure to uphold symbolic inclusivity. While opportunistic critiques deserve little attention, the emotionally charged reactions highlight the need for a nuanced discussion. It is essential to recognise the NPP’s track record as a champion of minority rights, even in politically and socially adverse circumstances. The party has consistently prioritised principle-based decision-making over political appeasement, distinguishing itself from traditional political practices. The absence of a Muslim minister in the Cabinet raises a broader question: Should ethnic representation take precedence over governance rooted in principles and the Rule of Law? The NPP’s victory reflects a public mandate to dismantle 76 years of political traditions, including symbolic representation, and replace them with a governance framework that ensures fairness, accountability, and the Rule of Law. It is worth asking whether past inclusion of Muslim ministers resulted in tangible benefits for the community, especially during periods of politically motivated violence and systemic discrimination. Sri Lanka’s most urgent need is not symbolic appointments but a governance system that guarantees equal rights, justice, and security for all citizens. The NPP has committed to: Forming a scientifically structured cabinet with portfolios assigned based on qualifications and expertise. Upholding the rule of law, where legislative processes are transparent and inclusive, ensuring that minority rights are protected. While symbolic representation is valuable, it should not overshadow the importance of creating a society where all communities can thrive under a just and accountable government. The NPP/JVP’s steadfast commitment to its principles sets it apart, making any accusations of racism or chauvinism baseless, even by its most ardent detractors. Here are two notable examples that underscore the party’s unwavering stance against racism, even at significant political risk: Easter Sunday aftermath: Following the tragic Easter Sunday terror attacks carried out by extremist individuals identifying as Muslims, a climate of fear and hostility enveloped the Muslim community. Many Muslim leaders and ministers failed to defend their community’s fundamental rights. Amid such turmoil, some Muslims were even compelled to burn their holy Qur’an out of fear of reprisal. In this difficult period, it was none other than His Excellency Anura Kumara Dissanayake (AKD) of the NPP/JVP who courageously stood up for the rights of Muslims, defending them without hesitation. Dr. Shafi allegations: When Dr. Shafi, a Muslim doctor, was wrongfully accused amid a broader campaign of baseless allegations against the Muslim community, a wave of political opportunists, and racist media outlets united to propagate these myths. Yet, only the NPP/JVP and HE AKD openly defended Dr. Shafi and the community, even when Muslim ministers remained silent. Unlike the opportunism rife in traditional Sri Lankan politics, the NPP/JVP adheres to a value-based approach. This principled stance is in stark contrast to the common perception that political alliances and compromises are essential for survival in Sri Lankan politics. The party’s actions during the Presidential election exemplify this ethos. Despite potential political disadvantages, the NPP/JVP refrained from forming opportunistic alliances, maintaining its independence and commitment to its ideals. Traditional parties in Sri Lanka have long indulged in appeasement politics, creating superfluous ministerial positions—such as those for coconut or kithul—to satisfy political allies, often at the expense of taxpayers. In stark contrast, the NPP/JVP has always prioritised merit and accountability over political convenience. Merit-based appointments: The NPP/JVP’s maiden cabinet consists of only 21 members, each selected based on professional qualifications and longstanding dedication to party principles. This streamlined approach ensures efficiency and accountability in governance. A focus beyond personal gain: NPP/JVP leaders do not seek positions for personal advancement. For instance, Tilvin Silva has served as the party’s General Secretary since 1995 without holding a Government position. Similarly, even members who secured the highest preferential votes, such as Namal Karunarathne (Kurunegala) and Nalin Hewage (Galle), were not appointed to cabinet roles but given deputy ministries, reflecting the party’s commitment to principle over patronage. The uproar over the absence of a Muslim representative in the maiden Cabinet of the NPP raises critical questions about the role of minority representation in governance and the larger priorities of the nation. While the emotional responses of many Sri Lankans, especially Muslims, are understandable, it is essential to analyse this issue through a rational lens, grounded in facts, history, and the present context. For the first time since independence, Sri Lanka’s Cabinet does not include a Muslim minister. Historically, every Government has accommodated at least one Muslim representative in the cabinet. However, this tradition alone is not a justification for its continuity. The NPP came to power with a clear mandate to break away from the entrenched practices of the last 76 years, which have often been associated with corruption, inefficiency, and symbolic gestures devoid of tangible benefits. The question many intellectuals now pose is whether this tradition of symbolic inclusion has ever translated into meaningful gains for the Muslim community. Muslim ministers have been present during events such as the violence in Dhargatown, Digana, and Minuwangoda, as well as during campaigns like “Wanda Kottu”, “Wanda Underwear”, and the persecution of Dr. Shafi. Their presence did little to prevent the politically motivated cremation of Muslim bodies during the pandemic. This history forces us to question whether representation alone, without action, serves the interests of the community or the nation. The fear that the absence of a Muslim minister could lead to the enactment of laws detrimental to the community is unfounded when one examines the legislative process. Sri Lanka’s legal system provides multiple layers of scrutiny before a bill becomes law: Cabinet review: Proposals are prepared by ministry officials, discussed, and approved by the cabinet. Public scrutiny: Once gazetted, the public can examine and challenge any bill in the Supreme Court if it violates constitutional or fundamental rights. Parliamentary debate: Parliamentarians from all backgrounds scrutinise and vote on the bill before it becomes law. The absence of a Muslim minister in the cabinet does not negate the checks and balances inherent in this process. Moreover, the presence of Muslim MPs in Parliament ensures that community concerns are voiced effectively. The argument that appointing a Muslim minister symbolises inclusivity and diversity is valid. A government that visibly represents all its people fosters a sense of belonging and national unity. However, symbolism must be balanced against the country’s immediate priorities. While inclusivity is desirable, the current socio-political climate demands a focus on ensuring rule of law, eradicating corruption, and establishing good governance. These principles, when implemented effectively, will benefit all communities, including minorities, far more than symbolic representation. The pressing need of the hour is not merely symbolic gestures but substantive governance. The NPP’s mandate is clear: Rule of Law: Ensuring justice, fairness, and equality for all citizens, irrespective of ethnicity or religion. Merit-based appointments: Selecting leaders and officials based on competence and commitment to public service, not tokenism or appeasement. Eradication of corruption and lawlessness and ensuring good governance: This is essential for fostering trust in institutions, promoting equitable development, and creating a stable, just society where all citizens can thrive. I am of the view that the absence of a Muslim minister in the NPP Cabinet is not an oversight but a reflection of the party’s principle-based governance model. It challenges the traditional approach of token minority representation and prioritises structural reforms to address systemic issues. Inclusivity and diversity remain important, but they must be achieved through actions that foster genuine unity and equity rather than symbolic appointments. The ultimate goal should be a Sri Lanka where all communities feel represented and protected under a governance system driven by principles, not traditions. Let us refrain from hastily judging the Government based on the absence of a Muslim minister in the NPP Cabinet—a decision that, while symbolic of inclusivity, has had little tangible impact on effectiveness. It is imperative for intellectuals and opinion leaders within the Muslim community to actively participate in politics and contribute to good governance. This engagement should transcend personal interests and focus on advancing the well-being of the community and the nation as a whole. As the saying goes, “You can’t make an omelette without breaking a few eggs.” Meaningful progress often necessitates difficult decisions and collective effort.

‘Call of Duty Black Ops 6’ Introduces a Limited Event Alongside a New Patch

Stock market today: Wall Street wavers at the start of a holiday-shortened week

No Going Back On Joining Political Process, IPW Tells IPOBNovember 25, 2024 This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies . Editors have highlightedthe following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility: fact-checked trusted source written by researcher(s) proofread by John Gowlett, The Conversation In pursuit of knowledge, the evolution of humanity ranks with the origins of life and the universe. And yet, except when an exciting find hits the headlines, paleoanthropology and its related fields have gained far less scientific support and funding—particularly for scientists and institutions based in the African countries where so many landmark discoveries have occurred. One of the first was made a century ago in Taung, South Africa, by mineworkers who came across the cranium of a 2.8 million-year-old child with human-like teeth . Its fossilized anatomy offered evidence of early human upright walking—and 50 years later, in the Afar region of northern Ethiopia that would become a hotspot for ancient human discovery, this understanding took another leap backwards in time with the discovery of Lucy . The part-skeleton of this small-bodied, relatively small-brained female captured the public's imagination . Lucy the "paleo-rock star" took our major fossil evidence for bipedal walking, human-like creatures (collectively known as hominins) beyond 3 million years for the first time. The race to explain how humans became what we are now was well and truly on. Since then, the picture has changed repeatedly and dramatically , shaped by waves of new fossil discovery, technology and scientific techniques—often accompanied by arguments about the veracity of claims made for each new piece of the puzzle. Even the term "human" is arguable. Many scholars reserve it for modern humans like us, even though we have Neanderthal genes and they shared at least 90% of our hominin history from its beginnings around 8 million years ago . The essence of hominin evolution ever since has been gradual change, with occasional rapid phases. The record of evolution in our own genus , Homo , is already full enough to show we cannot separate ourselves with hard lines. Nonetheless, there is enough consensus to thread the story of human evolution all the way from early apes to modern humanity. Most of this story centers on Africa, of course, where countries such as Kenya, South Africa and Ethiopia are rightly proud of their heritage as "cradles of humankind" —providing many of their schoolchildren with a much fuller answer then those in the west to this deceptively simple question: how did we get here? Early apes to 'hominization' (around 35m to 8m years ago) The story of human evolution usually starts at the point our distant ancestors began to separate from the apes, whose own ancestors are traceable from at least 35 million years ago and are well attested as fossils . Around 10 million years ago, the Miocene world was warm, moist and forested. Apes lived far and wide from Europe to China, though we have found them especially in Africa, where sediments of ancient volcanoes preserve their remains. This world was soon to be disrupted by cooling temperatures and, in places, great aridity—best seen around the Mediterranean , where continental movements closed off the Straits of Gibraltar and the whole sea evaporated several times, leaving immense salt deposits under the floor of the modern sea. Widespread drying was reported from around 7 to 6 million years ago, leading to a stronger expression of seasons in much of the world, and changes in plant and animal communities. The divergence from the apes of a lineage—the hominins—that eventually led to us had probably already begun 8 million years ago. But our knowledge of this date depends on molecular comparisons with other animals, rather than fossils. DNA shows we are most closely related to chimpanzees and their sister species, the bonobo. Branching points can be estimated by comparisons with other well-dated events, such as the separation of South American monkeys from other primates about 35 million years ago. Discover the latest in science, tech, and space with over 100,000 subscribers who rely on Phys.org for daily insights. Sign up for our free newsletter and get updates on breakthroughs, innovations, and research that matter— daily or weekly . A surprise from genetic science is that gorillas, the other African great apes, are less closely related to chimpanzees than chimps are to us. A chimpanzee, if it could speak, might tell us: "These gorillas may look like my big brothers, but actually I'm more closely related to you." They seem so similar because they are both tropical forest apes with similar adaptations, which underlines just how much—and how rapidly—the earliest hominins had to evolve to survive in their drier environments. Yet, there is still some debate about whether the chimpanzee is our best model for the starting point: the "last common ancestor" . Better to call it the "best living model" because the chimp has shown many adaptations of its own, especially in its limb proportions and locomotion, but also in its large shearing front teeth. But its social behavior, communication and tool-making have all provided invaluable insights into the processes that we can call "hominization." Earliest hominins (about 7m up to 4m years ago) The earliest hominin fossil yet known is about 7 million years old and comes from the middle of Africa, near Lake Chad. This rare find from 2001 is Sahelanthropus tchadensis , represented by a cranium (nicknamed "Toumaï" by its finders), a femur and teeth—all probably from the same species. Although these finds were limited, they were enough to show a bipedal creature probably still comfortable living in trees, who had teeth with hominin features. Many accompanying fossils of other species show this hominin lived in both woodland and grassland habitats. Then, for over a million years, our record vanishes—other than for some fragmentary remains of Orrorin tugenensis , a different genus of hominin found in the Tugen Hills of Kenya and dating to about 6 million years ago. Hominins appear again in plain sight with a new species dating back around 5.5 million years, Ardipithecus kadabba . The discovery of its partial jawbone and teeth in the Middle Awash region of northern Ethiopia in 1997 shed more light on what may have been the "stem ancestor" leading to all later hominins. Exceptionally thorough investigations have since revealed these creatures in full anatomical detail and in remarkable environmental context, showing Ardipithecus combined characters of both apes and later hominins. A. kadabba's finders emphasized that it was not chimpanzee-like in limb proportions, nor did it have their exaggerated shovel-like front teeth. It also overturned the old theory of hominins coming down from the trees into savannas, and thus being forced to become bipedal. Rather, Ardipithecus lived in thick woodland and supports the idea that bipedalism first arose as an adaptation to walking along tree boughs, perhaps while clasping the branches above. The stem hominin idea may well be correct, but more recent finds suggest there were soon multiple hominin species . While Ardipithecus is known from only one modern country, Ethiopia, there are huge areas of Africa that could have supported similar sibling species but which, for geological reasons, have not given up these secrets as generously as sections of the Great Rift Valley. It is also striking that Ardipithecus' feet remained apelike, with a divergent big toe—a sign that climbing trees was still important. The other, later species of Ardipithecus ( Ar. Ramidus ) lived only half a million years before the famous footprints found in Laetoli, Tanzania in 1976—trails of footprints that displayed fully human characteristics. Evolution would need to have been rapid indeed for those two creatures to be directly related. Even so, Ardipithecus had features that are enormously valuable for showing the general state of hominins at this time. Its pelvis, the oldest known, was short and basin-like as in later hominins, although ape-like in its lower part. And its teeth had enamel that was thicker than in African apes but thinner than in modern humans, suggesting an omnivorous diet. Australopithecines (about 4.3m to 1.4m years ago) More than 4 million years ago, another group of hominins begins to appear on the scene: the genus Australopithecus , named after the "Taung child" whose skull was discovered 100 years ago by workmen in the South African limestone quarry. While the name means "southern ape," the australopithecines were certainly hominins. Fully bipedal, their teeth were arranged in a modern human pattern with their canines reduced—sometimes to an extraordinary degree—and they existed in great diversity. As finds accumulate, at least ten species of this group are now known, indicating "adaptive radiation" —meaning that hominins had become highly successful and were by now adjusting to many different habitats and climates. While the australopithecines were confined to Africa, they extended widely from the south to the east and even towards the west near Lake Chad—close to the find of the older Sahelanthropus . This distribution underlines the argument for hominins having originated in Africa, as had been long suspected from the shared heritage with African apes. The oldest Australopithecus is A. anamensis , found in northern Kenya and dating to more than 4 million years ago, closely followed by A. afarensis in Ethiopia— Lucy's species —and A. prometheus in South Africa. Then, in addition to species such as A. africanus and A. garhi , there is a further group who combined enormous chewing teeth and ape-sized brains—their massive jaws and skulls led to them being dubbed the "robusts." Often officially termed Paranthropus rather than Australopithecus , they occurred as three separate species in southern and eastern Africa , appearing at least 3 million years ago and surviving until about 1.4 million years ago. While microwear studies of their teeth suggest a mixed diet, the huge size of those teeth implies it was of low quality, with grasses and sedges providing the bulk. Indeed, the dominance of these creatures' massive molars meant their front teeth shrank to the extent that their incisors and canines were consistently smaller than ours today. Although the African Rift Valley running down the east side of the continent is often celebrated as the focus of hominin origins, the distribution of australopithecines is just wide enough to show the rift is not necessarily the cradle of humankind—although it is the region where most fossils have been found. South Africa's dolomite caves are strong competitors in importance, while the discovery of A. bahrelghazali in Chad is far west of the rift. Beginnings of Homo (from about 2.8m years ago) It is certain that our own genus, Homo , emerged at some point from within the australopithecines. But exactly how and when is still difficult to ascertain, because cranial remains—skulls—are very scarce in the period between 3 and 2 million years ago. This is a matter of chance; before and after, we have plenty of them. Large numbers of teeth prove that hominins were in eastern and southern Africa during this period, and rare finds of crania such as P. aethiopicus and A. garhi make the point that others could be found at any moment. In later times, Homo is distinguished by its very large brain—about three times the size of a chimpanzee's brain—but this was not so in the beginning. At the start, Homo would have been almost indistinguishable from australopithecines, with just some small anatomical details picking it out, especially the shape of its molar and premolar teeth. Fragmentary jaws and teeth from Ledi Geraru and Hadar in Ethiopia, then from Chemeron in Kenya, trace the early story of our direct ancestors from 2.8 to 2.4 million years ago. As we approach 2 million years, Homo appears much more clearly in famous skull and other fossil discoveries from Olduvai Gorge (Tanzania) and East Turkana (Kenya), and latterly South Africa . As well as at least three species in Africa— Homo habilis , Homo rudolfensis and Homo erectus — Homo of similar age is suddenly found outside Africa, especially at Dmanisi in modern-day Georgia, where the finds are as old as those from Olduvai. Together with first archaeological finds of stone tools and cutmarks on animal bones indicating butchery, these fossils combine to show us that Homo had become highly successful within a million years of its origins, and had spread out far across Asia as far as China. These first arrivals must have been a species of early Homo , but it is only at Dmanisi and Lantien in China that we have early fossil remains. Technology was almost certainly part of the adaptation that allowed this great expansion. Tool-making is the most obvious part of early cultural behavior, and it is preserved as hard evidence by the presence of stone tools. First dates for stone tool-making have moved back in an exciting way. The 2 million-year barrier was broken around 1970, then the 3 million-year barrier just recently with discoveries of stone tools at Lomekwi and Nyayanga in Kenya. We do not know who made these tools, but it means stone artifacts emerged around the same time that early Homo appeared alongside the australopithecines. As "stone age visiting cards"—as the archaeologist Glynn Isaac labeled them—they are hugely useful for telling us where hominins went, and what they were doing. Talking point: Who made the first tools? A generation ago, it would have been axiomatic that the emergence of tools and Homo were linked, and that they signaled a major step forward—the development of early human culture. Now, there is a different perspective, largely owing to detailed studies of living animals . To a striking degree, chimpanzees make a range of tools as well as use them, and so do the small capuchin monkeys of South America. Birds too are in the picture, especially the New Caledonian crow . Their tools may be simple—mainly made from plant materials—but they include stones used for hammering. There are many indications that this animal behavior is cultural , handed on as learned tradition. Granted that we, Homo sapiens , are the most cultural animal of all, there has to be a possibility that all hominins were toolmakers and users, given that all fossil hominins are more closely related to us than to the chimpanzee, which is itself a habitual toolmaker. Having said that, we don't know who made the earliest stone tools. We know that when Paranthropus and other australopithecines eventually disappeared, toolmaking continued—but this does not rule out earlier tool use by some of them. Most early stone artifacts, from about 3 to 1.8 million, are placed in the "Oldowan tradition" —named after Olduvai Gorge where so many tools have been discovered, typically made from carefully selected lava or quartzite rocks. Both heavy core tools such as "choppers" and sharper stone flakes were used for a variety of tasks—certainly including animal butchery, and almost certainly in the preparation of plant foods and shaping of wooden tools (although these did not survive for our discovery until much later ). This toolkit literally gave early Homo species a cutting edge in the struggle for survival in varied environments, and may have been a key factor underlying their ability to expand their niche into new areas, including Jordan , north India and China well over 2 million years ago. Homo erectus (about 1.8m up to 0.5m years ago) After the rapidly expanding australopithecines, it is a relief to find the next 1.5 million years of human evolution looking rather simpler. One hominin— Homo erectus —becomes supreme, and the archaeology is dominated by one great theme: the handaxe or Acheulean tradition . Homo erectus first appeared as long as 2 million years ago, and was living in southern, eastern and northern Africa as well as the Middle and Far East, according to its fossil remains. It was far more human than earlier hominins, with brain size ranging from about 500cc in early examples to more than 1,000cc in later times—around 70% of our modern cranial capacity. Its limb proportions were fairly modern too, showing a striding form of bipedalism, evident both at Dmanisi in Georgia, and in the near-complete skeleton of "Turkana Boy" in Kenya. Homo erectus was wide-ranging and capable, as its tools confirm, having been found all over Africa and most of Asia. The handaxe form emerged around 1.75 million years ago in eastern Africa, probably as a good multi-purpose solution to everyday needs, and again made from lava or quartzite. The handaxe concept spread very widely; indeed, this may have been the first great diffusion of a "package of ideas." Some were so finely worked that they have been deemed the first art —or at least a sign of aesthetic feeling. In fact, Homo erectus may represent a group of similar species that existed in parallel—and that in some locations, could be quite varied. The single site of Dmanisi has offered up as much variety in five skulls as has been found across Africa. Existing finds make a giant "geographical donut," with nothing in the middle across the whole of southern Asia from Georgia to China. While Far Eastern Homo erectus was very similar to the African species, there are anomalies in this part of the story. For example, a remarkable and diminutive hominin species, Homo floresiensis —discovered in 2003 on the remote island of Flores in Indonesia, and often known as "the Hobbit"– had anatomical details, especially of its wrists, to suggest it could have been descended from an earlier Homo than Homo erectus . In southern Africa, meanwhile, Homo naledi was a primitive-seeming species that dates back just 300,000 years, and seems likely to have been a small-brained descendant of an early Homo erectus . It may have lived in gallery forest alongside streams, and survived in splendid isolation. The handaxes, too, were not all the same. The idea of making them seems to have spread far and wide, but not everywhere—they are absent in much of the Far East, for example. While some are now known from China, the famous fossil site of Zhoukoudian near Beijing—where remains of more than 40 Homo erectus individuals have been found—lacks them entirely. In Europe, ice ages and temperate periods alternated many times, so across the last 1 million years much of the early record has been erased by ice sheets. There is no definite evidence of Homo erectus but a probable sister species, Homo antecessor , lived in Atapuerca , northern Spain, perhaps as long ago as 1.4 million years. In this climatically challenging environment, we could wonder how "primitive" humans survived—but at the Arago cave in the Pyrenees, near France's Mediterranean coast, we know they were butchering reindeer 600,000 years ago and so able to endure the most severe cold. There are three main things we can say about the hominins of this long period up to half a million years ago: they were widely dispersed (hence highly adaptable and resilient); technically capable to the point that at least some of them used fire; and were evolving large brains that reflected their highly social nature. Fire seems to have been very important in human adaptation . It fits with ideas about cooking —the need for high-quality food to fuel the brain—and a reordering of the day to provide more social time , especially in the evening. Fire was also a key enabler of other technologies, in time allowing these early humans to begin pottery and metalworking. The origins of fire's "domestication" are far from certain, but are likely to date back at least 1 million years. Opportunistic use probably came before full control, with the ability to kindle fire eventually releasing humans from the need to keep it alight for long periods. Talking point: The benefits of a bigger brain In brain size, Homo erectus was certainly not static. Contrary to a general impression that most of the great brain enlargement in Homo is relatively recent, there was already some overlap with modern humans half a million years ago. Although it is natural to think that to be clever is an end in itself, large brains like ours are costly enough to take 20–30% of our energy, and they have to pay their way. Most species succeed with far less than hominins, and to treble brain size in 2 million years is a remarkable phenomenon. Such an expansion was only possible through a high-quality diet and reduction in the size of other major organs. As the large brain is energetically expensive, it must have had evolutionary drivers. One of the most appealing is the "social brain hypothesis" , whose core idea is that in some environments, ecological survival favored larger groups. We know from regular stone tool transport distances of 5–10 km, and occasional ones of 20–30km, that hominins were ranging much further than apes even 2 million years ago. The social management of such groups is very demanding, and may have been a spur towards developing larger brains. The acceleration in change that is such a feature of modern life seems to have started around half a million years ago. In Africa, Homo erectus gave way to larger-brained descendants such as Homo heidelbergensis , which was also present in Europe. But in archaeology, major developments were seen even before the first early modern human fossils emerged. Two key developments were the appearance of projectile (spear) points and the long-distance transport of materials. The stone spear points indicated that their makers had mastered hafting , and hence had knowledge of fixatives such as glue or twine. In southern Africa, we see the beginnings of these developments as long as 400,000 years ago. With their bigger brains, larger social groups and better weapons, hominins developed and honed their unique hunting techniques , often working by ambush and taking prime animals rather than the old and young. While that pattern may date back more than a million years, in the last 50,000 years this practice may have been so intense that it contributed to the demise of many large animals, including the mammoth, mastodons, and giant marsupials. In all this, there is plentiful evidence of high skill. In the Levallois technique , which few can reproduce today, the maker prepared a stone core by careful flaking, and had to "see" the artifact before releasing in one blow. Such skills could approach art . Numbers of ancient pieces including some of the handaxes would qualify as art by modern definitions, although we know little about the past intent. Such finds suggest the basic abilities for art were in place as much as a million years ago, but its projection into non-utilitarian forms gives another level to the evidence of human intellect. Modern humans (from around 300,000 years ago) Many people look at human evolution chiefly to explain us, Homo sapiens . But we are the culmination of a long process of evolution—no more than 5% of the whole hominin story by time spent on this planet. Until the 1980s, our species was thought to have first appeared around 40,000 years ago in a "human revolution"—an explosion of creativity marked by the flowering of cave art and sophisticated tools. However, many events in this analysis were incorrectly concertinaed together by a ceiling in radiocarbon dates , which the rapid decay rate of carbon-14 limited to a maximum age of about 40,000 years. Since then, new dating techniques based on other radioisotopes and new finds have expanded the timescale for the existence of Homo sapiens by almost a factor of ten. In fact, the first early modern humans , closely resembling us, appeared about 300,000 years ago in northern and eastern Africa. This drastic change of timescale alters our perspective in ways that are still being explored. For a start, we now know that for a long period, the earliest modern humans were not alone. They existed alongside Homo neanderthalensis , the Neanderthals—the people of the north, ranging from western Europe to Siberia—for hundreds of thousands of years. To the east, DNA studies have recognized a probable sister group of the Neanderthals, the Denisovans —best known from Denisova cave in the Altai mountains of Siberia—while to the south, Homo naledi was still there, and the Kabwe skull from Zambia is evidence for at least one other species. Astonishing progress in genomic research has shown that the Neanderthals and Denisovans were separate species , but so closely related to our H. sapiens ancestors that interbreeding was possible. Does the ability of these species to interact imply the existence of language? As with fire, language origins have been one of the major debating points within palaeoanthropology. Small clues are enigmatic. More than 2 million years ago, a mutation reduced the power of the chewing muscles in human ancestors. That may indicate they were doing more food preparation, but also possibly making more controlled use of their mouths . Expanded nerve outlets in the thoracic vertebrae appeared in Homo erectus , indicating the millisecond control of breathing that is necessary for language. And later, 400,000-year-old Homo heidelbergensis remains from Atapuerca in northern Spain had perfectly preserved ear canals which were tuned to the frequencies used in human language. As these Atapuerca hominins were probable Neanderthal ancestors, there is a good chance that at least a simple form of language was very widespread at this point, if not earlier. Paintings first appeared—or were preserved—around 50,000 years ago, but beads and ornaments can be traced back much earlier. The oldest so far are shell beads from Es-Skhul cave on Mount Carmel in Israel, dating back about 130,000 years. They mark out personal identity, and hence the idea that one person can appreciate these signals in another. Shell beads occurred again at Blombos in South Africa about 70,000 years ago, along with a piece of engraved ochre. Burials have a similar antiquity: both Neanderthal and early modern burials occurred from about 130,000 years ago—although older finds such as the numerous human remains in one cave at Atapuerca, or cutmarks on a skull at Bodo in Ethiopia, may indicate there was already a special interest in human bodies. The burials suggest that early humans had a strong idea of the needs of others. Some burials—both of early moderns and Neanderthals—had red ochre smeared on the bodies. This is likely to have carried symbolic significance. "Symbolism" has played a crucial part in all modern human behavior, underpinning language, religion, and art. However, studying its origins presents pitfalls, because other animals seem capable of using symbols, as when a chimpanzee offers a clipped leaf to another. The line between such "signs" and symbols is easily blurred. But the projection of symbols into the outside world in the form of material objects is a measurable step, so long as they survive. The beads and burials are among the earliest evidence of behavior which may, in fact, have had much deeper origins. The great breakout (about 100,000 years ago) More than 100,000 years ago, the early modern humans began to expand outside Africa, leading to the greatest diaspora in human history. Variation in modern human DNA preserves geographic signals that tell us something about past population movements. Even better, fossil DNA can be isolated from bone specimens up to about 50,000 years old in cool climates, and sometimes even older. The results confirm that the Neanderthals were a truly separate species, with their ancestors separating from ours between 500,000 and 700,000 years ago, and living on until about 40,000 years ago. Some of the clearest genetic signals come from parts of the genome that do not recombine each generation—that is, the Y-chromosome and mitochondrial DNA. These have allowed scientists to assemble "family trees" which show that all modern humans ( Homo sapiens ) are related within about 150,000 years. They also indicate, along with the archaeological evidence, that modern humans surged out of Africa after that date, sweeping around the world and eventually completely replacing other hominins such as the Neanderthals and Denisovans—although some of their genes survived in us, thanks to rare past matings between species. In essence, this was a great population expansion rather than a migration. Populations remained in Africa and along the way, but this astonishing wave of advance headed east across Asia, then north into Europe, and ultimately to all parts of the world. The start was necessarily from north-east Africa, offering a land route into the Middle East and, at times of low sea-level, a likely southern one to Arabia . Climate changes almost certainly played a major part: each time "green Sahara" became desert Sahara in the rhythmic changes of the ice ages, this would pulse people out into the Levant . Modern humans are visible there around 130,000 years ago—but Neanderthals succeeded them around 80,000 years ago as conditions became colder again. Probably by then, the great move east had already happened: early modern humans had covered the 12,000 kilometers to Australia as long as 70,000 years ago. At least 45,000 years ago, they were in north-east China , perhaps arriving by a route north of the Himalayas. From there, it was 6,000km to the Bering landbridge that would lead to Alaska. By 14,500 years ago, modern humans were in Monte Verde, Chile after an astonishing 15,000km journey down the Americas. The severe cold of the last glacial maximum , 20,000 years ago, must have slowed down this progress. Sea levels dropped more than 100 meters, and northern populations were rolled back by the ice advances. Many American archaeologists still believe the first settlement in their continent began after this, but footprint trails in New Mexico dated to the 20,000s BCE are part of growing evidence for earlier dates. Such debates do not alter the big picture: at times, our direct ancestors were progressing about a kilometer every five years; at others, they were shooting forward great distances. Some of them, at least, had become adventurers, with something like the wanderlust characteristic of modern explorers. They traveled both inland and along the coasts, by foot and certainly by boat. They covered high and low terrain, in warm and cold, wet and dry—all the while, living by the ancient and enduring adaptation of hunting and gathering. Last of the Neanderthals (about 40,000 years ago) Historically, studies in human evolution greatly emphasized Europe. While the balance has rightly been redressed to a global perspective in the last 50 years, Europe remains important in our record—both because northern climates better preserve organic remains including DNA, and because this rich record has been studied intensively for more than 150 years. Amid the great diaspora of early modern humans, a newer perspective is that, by the time the last Neanderthals were gone from Europe, fully modern humans had already dispersed through Australia and throughout the Far East. But these events remain puzzling because the Neanderthals had held their own with early modern humans for hundreds of thousands of years across a fluctuating frontier, and were dominant in the Middle East as late as 60,000 years ago. The Neanderthals have an enduring fascination because they are so like us and yet so different. They were stocky and strong, and had a brain size as large as ours. Their abilities have been debated for more than a century, but there is strong evidence that they are an alternative humanity rather than an inferior humanity. They had full control of fire, made bone tools, and used pigments as well as burying their dead. Their replacement by modern humans was completed between 50,000 and 40,000 years ago. What gave the moderns the edge? It could be that a known series of rapid climate fluctuations destabilized the Neanderthal populations. There is evidence that they were living in small groups, under stress and with significant inbreeding , and a consensus now is that demographic factors were a main cause of their disappearance. Talking point: Art and technology In Europe, the traditional idea of a "creative revolution" was highlighted by the disappearance of the Neanderthals around 40,000 years ago, and the arrival of new populations with new toolkits—the Upper Paleolithic with its blade tools, bone tools and artwork. Elsewhere, such advanced traits often appeared earlier. At the moment, the earliest known cave art comes from Karampuang Hill on Sulawesi, Indonesia, where there are representations of humans and animals dated to 51,000 years ago. European art is considerably later, except for some markings which could have been made by Neanderthals, who certainly used pigments. From around 40,000 years ago, there began to be other representations, including one of exceptional importance: a small statue of mammoth ivory found in a cave in what is now southern Germany. It combines the head of a lion with a human body , showing the artist's ability to morph a 3D form which may have had religious significance. By the time of the 20,000s BCE, we see many signs of new technologies and skills: basketry in the Gravettian phase of central Europe; the first pottery in China ; polished axes in Australia and New Guinea ; and specialized use of marine resources in South Africa, Indonesia and elsewhere. Probably, there were also the first domesticated dogs , who became well-documented in Europe about 15,000 years ago. After the ice (about 20,000 years ago) Following the glacial maximum, there came a steady return to warmer conditions, culminating in the period we call the Holocene . Ice sheets retreated to the north, temperate vegetation appeared and the sea came up, with profound effects on coastal settlement around the world. Along with new environmental stresses, around 12,000 years ago came the next major shift in human adaptation: the agricultural revolution . The domestication of plants and animals soon led to vast increases in population numbers. Villages, towns and civilizations followed, ultimately made possible by the control of food supplies that hunters and gatherers could never have, but also dependent on technological advances and complex social behavior. It is easy to take for granted that we are human. But knowing the human evolutionary story, even if at times from only a few fossil fragments, shows it could easily have been otherwise. Had climate patterns been slightly different, Neanderthals might have survived. They or the Denisovans could be carrying the flag of progress, in a different way and at a different pace. Today, we are still not on top of things. The greatest changes in the world are humanly created, and they stem above all from our vast numbers. For at least 99.5% of the time of Homo , our ancestors lived as hunters and gatherers, with global numbers no more than a few million. Yet now, over a single human lifespan, the global population has grown fourfold, from 2 billion to 8 billion. The story of human evolution is about more than bones and stones. It helps us to see our many strengths and limitations. The strengths include an ability to manage rapid cultural change, especially in technology—the key to our survival over a very long period, and vital for coping with environmental change. But this ability is also having many unforeseen consequences to our planet and its biodiversity, and to our own human societies. It is a triumph that most of the 8 billion humans alive today are living relatively happily and, thanks to modern medicine, for longer than ever before. But it is all part of a high-risk species strategy that has characterized the story of human evolution from its earliest origins nearly 8 million years ago. Throughout this story, success has regularly thrown up new sets of problems. Our ancient ancestors had no choice but to forge forwards into the unknown, adapting to survive. Many times over, they surmounted challenges at least as great as those we face today. Provided by The Conversation This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article .

King and PM honour former US president Jimmy Carter after his death aged 100Trump selects longtime adviser Keith Kellogg as special envoy for Ukraine and Russia

USC women move to No. 4 in AP poll as top three unchanged