
By adopting a linear narrative style, director James Wu effectively captures the essence of each character's journey, allowing for a deeper exploration of their motivations, relationships, and inner turmoil. The chronological storytelling not only enhances the coherence and clarity of the plot but also enables a more seamless and immersive viewing experience for the audience.
Opposition Leader John Pesutto defamed ousted Liberal MP Moira Deeming, the Federal Court has found, in a high-stakes judgment that could cost him his job. Pesutto was ordered to pay Deeming $300,000 for the damage to her reputation in a damning judgment that found he had defamed her on five separate occasions. Independent MP Moira Deeming (centre) pictured arriving at court ahead of the judgment. Credit: AAPIMAGE Deeming alleged she had been “tarred with the Nazi brush” as part of Pesutto’s “campaign” to expel her from the parliamentary Liberal Party, her barrister Sue Chrysanthou, SC, had told the court. Deeming, who now sits on the crossbench of the Victorian Parliament, had helped organise the Let Women Speak rally on March 18, 2023. Neo-Nazis were among several groups of protesters that arrived at the steps of parliament that day. She condemned the men, said they were not there to support her cause, and told the court she did not see them until they were escorted away by police. Pesutto moved to expel Deeming from the parliamentary party in the following days. She was instead suspended in a last-minute compromise, but was ultimately expelled weeks later, after threatening to bring in lawyers. Handing down his decision on Thursday after hearing more than three weeks of evidence that damaged the party room and threatened stability, Justice David O’Callaghan agreed Pesutto had defamed Deeming. Rumblings to overthrow Pesutto in October did not amount to anything, but many in the party room had privately accepted that a loss for Pesutto would make his position as leader untenable. John Pesutto and Moira Deeming outside the Federal Court during the defamation trial. Credit: The Age Loading In a damning finding, O’Callaghan found Pesutto had defamed Deeming in a media release, one radio and one TV interview, at a press conference and in an expulsion motion and dossier. O’Callaghan said that while Pesutto had defended the case on the grounds of public interest, honest opinion and qualified privilege, all those failed and the defence of contextual truth did not arise. More to come Get alerts on significant breaking news as happens. Sign up for our Breaking News Alert . Save Log in , register or subscribe to save articles for later. License this article Defamation John Pesutto Moira Deeming Victorian Parliament Liberal Party Rachel Eddie is a Victorian state political reporter for The Age. Previously, she was a city reporter and has covered breaking news. Connect via Twitter or email . Most Viewed in Politics Loading
As the hosts traverse the island, visiting quaint bookshops, engaging with local authors, and delving into the literary heritage of Hainan, they invite viewers to join them on a quest for knowledge and inspiration. Through thought-provoking discussions, insightful interviews, and captivating storytelling, "Reading on the Islands" encourages audiences to explore the world of books and embrace the transformative power of literature.
Innodata EVP Ashok Mishra sells $67,560 in stockThe sudden surge in trading volume can be attributed to a variety of factors, including positive market sentiment, favorable economic indicators, and the release of key corporate earnings reports. Investors, buoyed by these developments, quickly seized the opportunity to position themselves for potential gains, resulting in a frenzy of buying and selling activity.
The discussions that followed were a whirlwind of perspectives, ideas, and debates. Panelists from diverse backgrounds - from academia to industry to government - shared their experiences and reflections on the role of AI in shaping our societies. Dr. Zhang Jie, a leading neuroscientist, spoke passionately about the intersection of AI and human cognition, highlighting the potential for AI to unlock new frontiers in understanding the brain.In addition to his on-field performances, Lee Gang-in's off-field activities have also played a crucial role in boosting his merchandise sales. Whether it's collaborating with fashion brands, participating in charity events, or engaging with fans through virtual meet-and-greets, Lee has shown a willingness to go above and beyond to connect with his audience and build a strong brand image.In a recent development, a missing female master's student who was found has been hospitalized for treatment while the case is under investigation. The incident has sparked concerns and raised questions about her disappearance and subsequent discovery.
From student movement to elections: JLKM’s impact in state politics
Last month, the film adaptation of the popular Broadway musical, “ Wicked ,” released in theaters, breaking box office records. A viral post online prompts people to share photos they took while watching the movie. “Show ur ‘wicked part 1’ photos,” the post says. Although many people are aware that video recording inside the theater is illegal, others replied to the post with photos they took in their local movie theater, sparking a discussion online about whether it’s legal to take those pictures. Movie theater chain Alamo Drafthouse responded to the post calling for photos, writing “Or, don't do that.” THE QUESTION Is it illegal to take pictures of movies at the theaters? THE SOURCES United States Code 2319B Eisner Gorin LLP AMC Theaters Regal THE ANSWER Yes, it is illegal to take pictures of movies at the theaters. WHAT WE FOUND Taking photos of a movie in theaters is illegal under federal copyright laws. Movie theaters also ban the practice. United States Code 2319B states that “any person who, without the authorization of the copyright owner, knowingly uses or attempts to use an audiovisual recording device to transmit or make a copy of a motion picture or other audiovisual work protected under title 17, or any part thereof, from a performance of such work in a motion picture exhibition facility” could face up to three years in prison, fines, or both. If it's a subsequent offense, prison time can increase to up to six years. Audiovisual recording devices are defined under the law to be “a digital or analog photographic or video camera, or any other technology or device capable of enabling the recording or transmission of a copyrighted motion picture or other audiovisual work.” By that definition, cell phones or any still image camera would be included. In addition, the crime is not limited to distributing or sharing illegal work. The very act of taking the picture is in itself illegal. While the law “emerged in response to the growing threat of piracy in the digital age,” Eisner Gorin LLP says it “targets the act of recording itself, regardless of whether the recorded content is distributed or used for personal gain.” Federal law gives theater employees the authority to detain anyone suspected of violating the law. Many movie theaters have outlined in their rules that filming or taking photos during a movie is strictly prohibited. For example, Regal’s admittance policy says , “No recording devices (cameras, video recorders, sound recorders, etc.) are permitted to be used within any Regal Entertainment Group facility.” AMC Theaters has a similar policy, with its code of conduct stating , “In support of federal law, camera use is not permitted in our auditoriums” Related Articles Social media impersonation accounts are illegal in some states, if they’re intentionally deceitful No, T-Mobile is not fining customers over their text message content Are surprise restaurant fees illegal? It depends on where you are The VERIFY team works to separate fact from fiction so that you can understand what is true and false. Please consider subscribing to our daily newsletter , text alerts and our YouTube channel . You can also follow us on Snapchat , Instagram , Facebook and TikTok . Learn More » Follow Us YouTube Snapchat Instagram Facebook TikTok Want something VERIFIED? Text: 202-410-8808Johnson Controls prices senior notes offering
InnovationRx: What We Know About UnitedHealthcare CEO’s Alleged Killer So FarIn conclusion, Haier's firm denial of the layoff rumors and its pledge to pursue legal responsibility against those spreading misinformation send a clear signal that the company takes its reputation and the well-being of its employees seriously. By standing up against false rumors and holding accountable those who seek to sow discord and confusion, Haier reaffirms its commitment to honesty, integrity, and trustworthiness in all its endeavors.