online slot games no wagering
Affirm CFO Robert O'Hare sells $957,548 in stockQU concludes 5th M-E Parkinson’s Disease and Movement Disorders Camp
Mikel Arteta hailed the best away European performance of his Arsenal reign after watching his side dismantle Sporting Lisbon 5-1. The Gunners delivered the statement Champions League victory their manager had demanded to bounce back from a narrow defeat at Inter Milan last time out. Goals from Gabriel Martinelli, Kai Havertz, Gabriel Magalhaes, Bukayo Saka and Leandro Trossard got their continental campaign back on track, lifting them to seventh place with 10 points in the new-look 36-team table. It was Arsenal’s biggest away win in the Champions League since beating Inter by the same scoreline in 2003. “For sure, especially against opposition we played at their home who have not lost a game in 18 months – they have been in top form here – so to play with the level, the determination, the purpose and the fluidity we showed today, I am very pleased,” said Arteta. “The team played with so much courage, because they are so good. When I’m watching them live they are so good! They were all exceptional today. It was a big performance, a big win and we are really happy. “The performance was there a few times when we have played big teams. That’s the level that we have to be able to cope and you have to make it happen, and that creates belief.” A memorable victory also ended Sporting’s unbeaten start to the season, a streak of 17 wins and one draw, the vast majority of which prompted Manchester United to prise away head coach Ruben Amorim. The Gunners took the lead after only seven minutes when Martinelli tucked in Jurrien Timber’s cross, and Saka teed up Havertz for a tap-in to double the advantage. Arsenal added a third on the stroke of half-time, Gabriel charging in to head Declan Rice’s corner into the back of the net. To rub salt in the wound, the Brazilian defender mimicked Viktor Gyokeres’ hands-over-his-face goal celebration. That may have wound Sporting up as they came out after the interval meaning business, and they pulled one back after David Raya tipped Hidemasa Morita’s shot behind, with Goncalo Inacio netting at the near post from the corner. But when Martin Odegaard’s darting run into the area was halted by Ousmane Diomande’s foul, Saka tucked away the penalty. Substitute Trossard added the fifth with eight minutes remaining, heading in the rebound after Mikel Merino’s shot was saved. A miserable night for prolific Sporting striker Gyokeres was summed up when his late shot crashed back off the post.
They were all exceptional – Mikel Arteta loved seeing Arsenal run riot in LisbonThe Johnstown Tomahawks have won 12 of their past 16 games entering a pivotal stretch in the North American Hockey League East Division schedule. Coach Jared Kersner’s Tomahawks begin a 10-game homestand against the North American Hockey League East Division-leading Rochester Jr. Americans at 7:30 p.m. Friday at 1st Summit Arena @ Cambria County War Memorial. The teams meet again at 7 p.m. Saturday. Trailing the Jr. Americans by five points in the division standings, Johnstown has an opportunity to gain ground and build on the past month’s momentum. “Weekend’s huge,” Kersner said. “Having 10 games at home is really exciting for us. This is an opportunity to try to gather as many points as possible on home ice, but Rochester presents a huge challenge. First place – we’re five points back. We feel like we have been playing well. We have obstacles in our lineup – injuries. We’re short some guys.” Kersner’s team lost some depth on defense. “The biggest one, Dylan Shane, suffered a laceration last Saturday in Maryland, and he’s out,” Kersner said of the team captain. “Jacob Ingstrup is out, too. Michal Capos will leave to join Team Slovakia U-18 (program), and that will leave us with five available defensemen on Saturday. We definitely will have to use an affiliated player in that game.” The Tomahawks are 8-2-0 in their past 10 games and have 28 points at 13-10-2 overall. Rochester is 7-2-1 in its past 10 contests and is 14-6-5 with 33 points. “Rochester is going to bring quite a bit of challenges we need to be prepared for,” Kersner said. Three Jr. Americans have combined to score 32 goals. Hugo Branthsson and Calle Karlsson each have 11 goals and 27 points. Owen King has 10 goals. Adam Gionta, a 19-goal scorer in 2023-24, has nine goals and 25 points. Goaltender Danick Leroux has 10 wins, including two shutouts, a .920 save percentage and 2.20 goals against average. “After all of the success we’ve had lately, we want to see how we stack up against the division’s No. 1 (team),” said Kersner, whose Tomahawks won a pair of one-goal games against Rochester at 1st Summit Arena Oct. 18-19. Since Oct. 12, Johnstown is 12-3-1 with 25 of a possible 32 points. “Our team has been built from the backside out lately – goaltending, defense, defensive play by our forwards,” Kersner said. “The biggest thing is the connectivity – learning how to play together. Learning to play inside the team structure. The guys have put in the hard work and bought into each other.” Both the power play and penalty kill have been assets during the current run. “The biggest change is the special teams,” Kersner said. “In November, our power play clicked at nearly 27% and the penalty kill (success) was 90%. We’ve been able to really take advantage of the special teams. Last week in Maryland, we won 4-1. We scored two power-play goals, had a short- handed goal, and didn’t allow any goals on the penalty kill. Special teams have been a huge part of our success.” Tate Pecknold, Ryan Flaherty and Cullen Emery each have three power-play goals this season. Nick Jarmain, Hank Reed, Nick White and Jack Genovese have been mainstays on the penalty kill. “We only allowed one 5-on-4 goal in the month of November,” Kersner said. “In that game, Nick White and Nick Jarmain were hurt, or our percentage might be even better.” The Tomahawks will be at home Friday through a two-game set against the Maine Nordiques Jan. 10-11. In between, Danbury will visit for four games on back-to-back weekends, and Northeast will be in town for a pair, including New Year’s Eve. “I’m excited to be in front of our home crowds for the next 10 games,” Kersner said. “We’re looking forward to playing hard for them over these next 10 games.” Mike Mastovich is a sports reporter and columnist for The Tribune-Democrat. He can be reached at 814-532-5083. Follow him on Twitter @Masty81. (c)2024 The Tribune-Democrat (Johnstown, Pa.) Visit The Tribune-Democrat (Johnstown, Pa.) at www.tribune-democrat.com Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy are suggesting the country stop its biannual ritual of falling back and springing forward – advocating a permanent end to time changes in a move that has garnered broad support in the past. In a series of posts on X last week, both entrepreneurs called for the US to stop changing its clocks twice a year, with Musk declaring Americans want their country to “abolish the annoying time changes!” and Ramaswamy describing the century-old practice as “inefficient & easy to change.” It’s unclear how seriously the two men are taking this push and whether they intend to make stopping time changes a priority for their newly formed Department of Government Efficiency, which President-elect Donald Trump has tasked with overhauling how the government operates and identifying and making recommendations to eliminate processes or programs deemed redundant. While other objectives floated by Musk and Ramaswamy for their department to tackle have been criticized as unwieldy or not possible, the semi-annual clock change is a tradition that has lost its appeal to many voters, polls have shown. And the change, if enacted, would be the most sweepingly impactful recommendation floated by Musk and Ramaswamy yet, affecting how hundreds of millions of people start and end their days. It’s also an idea that some key members of Trump’s incoming administration and the Republican Senate caucus have vocally supported for years. But some experts say the suggestion of sweeping changes resulting from a possible elimination of clock changes is overblown. “I think this is really an argument between morning people and nighttime people,” said Dr. Jadrian Wooten, a collegiate associate professor at Virginia Tech’s Department of Economics who has studied the risk and benefits of Daylight Saving Time. The benefits espoused by people who prefer more light in the morning could inversely be true for the same as those who prefer more light later in the afternoon. For each study that shows a positive one way, another study can show one for the other. There are three different camps in the debate. One argues for leaving the time changes as they currently are, with most of the country changing their clocks forward in March and back in November. This approach attempts to balance the amount of sunlight people receive on any given day and strikes a compromise between those who prefer more sunlight in the morning and those who prefer more in the evening; each group gets their preference at different points in the year. It’s the Goldilocks solution. The second advocates for a permanent standard time, keeping the clocks as they are from November to March year-round. This would lead to parts of the country experiencing earlier sunrises and sunsets than they usually do during those five months – leaving more light in the morning and less in the evening. This approach is supported by medical groups and professionals who say it most closely aligns with the body’s natural circadian rhythm. “If you get too much light too late in the evening, it disrupts your sleep, and we are essentially creating a months-long environment in which we are actually receiving light at a time that is later in the day than is optimal for our health,” said Dr. Adam Spira, a professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health who studies the benefits of healthy sleep habits. “We’re already a sleep-deprived society,” Spira said, “and we’re making it harder for people to fall asleep.” This approach also resonates with parents who don’t want their children waiting for the school bus under a dark morning sky. “It’s kids getting ready to go to school,” said Wooten, the Virginia Tech economist. “It’s kids getting on the bus. You know, it’s really dangerous to put kids out waiting for the bus in the morning when it’s really dark outside, and so if you have that extra time in the morning, it’s a safer morning for most people, right?” The third advocates for a permanent Daylight Saving Time. The sun would rise and set later, giving people less daylight in the morning and more in the evening. This approach is often supported by retail, business and restaurant groups and organizations that want people to have enough daylight left after work or school to be out and about and participating in the economy, and by those who say more daylight in the evening could reduce crime. The reasons for supporting any side in this debate are as disparate as each individual’s own personal life experiences; some parents may prefer that their children not wait for the bus during a dark morning, while other parents may prefer there be some daylight while they watch their kids practice sports after school. While Musk and Ramaswamy both said they support ending the clock changes, it’s not clear whether they are proposing the country adopt permanent Daylight Saving Time or permanent standard time. Musk seemed to signal support for both conflicting ideas in his posts to X last week. “Looks like the people want to abolish the annoying time changes!” he wrote in response to an X user who made poll that showed wide support for abolishing Daylight Saving Time. Hours later, he responded with an enthusiastic “ Yes! ” when Florida Sen. Rick Scott touted the Sunshine Protection Act, legislation he supports which would “lock the clock” and make Daylight Saving Time the standard. That post, which said Daylight Saving Time “needs to go,” was eventually deleted because it contained what Scott’s office described as a typographical error. Scott, whose unsuccessful bid for Senate leadership was supported by Musk and who now sits on the DOGE Senate caucus, signed a state version of that bill into law when he was governor of Florida in 2018. “Floridians are sick of changing their clocks because we all want more sunshine,” Scott said in an October statement touting the bill. “It’s time for Congress to act, pass the Sunshine Protection Act and lock the clock.” Previous attempts to do so have faltered. Daylight Saving Time was first introduced during World War I to assist with the nation’s industrial productivity during the Great War – not, as popular rumors frequently suggest, to give farmers more day time during harvest. Daylight Saving Time was kept permanent during most of World War II, also for reasons to do with industry and energy. During the gas crisis in the 1970s, the country once again tried making Daylight Saving Time permanent, only for public approval to plummet after complaints of children being hit by cars while waiting for the bus at night. States aren’t required to change their clocks; Hawaii, most of Arizona and some US territories in the Pacific and Caribbean do not observe Daylight Saving Time. In 2022, the US Senate passed legislation making Daylight Saving Time permanent, but the House failed to vote on it. And last year, a bipartisan group of senators reintroduced legislation that would make a switch to daylight saving permanent. Now, with the possible support of one of the richest men in the world, the country may prepare to make another change – one way or the other. Musk and Ramaswamy are expected to address Republican House and Senate members on Thursday afternoon, with the meeting expected to center on the newly formed efficiency department.Pheu Thai bill 'to curb coups'