7bet online

7bet online Black Caps fans must wait for a first glimpse of one young star but there will be no shortage of unseen talent lighting up Bay Oval tonight. While skipper Mitchell Santner has confirmed the uncapped Bevon Jacobs will only watch the first T20 against Sri Lanka, another three young prospects are set for home debuts when the three-match series begins at Bay Oval. With wider stakes essentially absent in Mount Maunganui, most interest will lay in the hosts’ latest attempts to freshen their stocks, a gradual process that has already reaped success for a once-ageing team. Enter Tim Robinson, Mitch Hay and Zak Foulkes, a trio who have previously worn the black cap only offshore . They join surprise IPL pick Jacobs as the sole members of a 13-man squad born since the millennium, each bringing 30 games of domestic experience and great hopes of contributing at the international level for years to come.Citigroup Inc. lowered its position in Integer Holdings Co. ( NYSE:ITGR – Free Report ) by 99.0% in the third quarter, according to its most recent 13F filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The firm owned 78,181 shares of the medical equipment provider’s stock after selling 7,744,094 shares during the quarter. Citigroup Inc. owned 0.23% of Integer worth $10,164,000 as of its most recent SEC filing. Other hedge funds also recently modified their holdings of the company. Contravisory Investment Management Inc. lifted its position in shares of Integer by 55.9% in the 3rd quarter. Contravisory Investment Management Inc. now owns 223 shares of the medical equipment provider’s stock worth $29,000 after acquiring an additional 80 shares during the period. Huntington National Bank lifted its position in shares of Integer by 8,933.3% during the 3rd quarter. Huntington National Bank now owns 271 shares of the medical equipment provider’s stock worth $35,000 after buying an additional 268 shares during the period. Quest Partners LLC lifted its position in shares of Integer by 3,688.9% during the 2nd quarter. Quest Partners LLC now owns 341 shares of the medical equipment provider’s stock worth $39,000 after buying an additional 332 shares during the period. GAMMA Investing LLC lifted its position in shares of Integer by 60.9% during the 2nd quarter. GAMMA Investing LLC now owns 375 shares of the medical equipment provider’s stock worth $43,000 after buying an additional 142 shares during the period. Finally, Innealta Capital LLC bought a new position in shares of Integer during the 2nd quarter worth approximately $110,000. Institutional investors own 99.29% of the company’s stock. Integer Stock Down 0.1 % NYSE ITGR opened at $140.71 on Friday. The stock has a fifty day moving average of $131.38 and a 200-day moving average of $124.36. The stock has a market capitalization of $4.72 billion, a P/E ratio of 43.43, a price-to-earnings-growth ratio of 2.02 and a beta of 1.09. Integer Holdings Co. has a 52 week low of $84.75 and a 52 week high of $142.00. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.67, a quick ratio of 2.09 and a current ratio of 3.28. Analyst Ratings Changes ITGR has been the subject of several analyst reports. Piper Sandler restated an “overweight” rating and set a $140.00 target price (up previously from $125.00) on shares of Integer in a research report on Friday, October 25th. KeyCorp raised their target price on Integer from $139.00 to $144.00 and gave the stock an “overweight” rating in a research report on Tuesday, October 15th. Benchmark raised their target price on Integer from $130.00 to $140.00 and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a research report on Monday, October 21st. Citigroup raised their price target on Integer from $124.00 to $130.00 and gave the company a “neutral” rating in a report on Tuesday, October 1st. Finally, Bank of America raised their price target on Integer from $135.00 to $145.00 and gave the company a “buy” rating in a report on Tuesday, October 1st. One analyst has rated the stock with a hold rating and seven have issued a buy rating to the company. According to MarketBeat.com, Integer presently has an average rating of “Moderate Buy” and an average target price of $139.75. View Our Latest Research Report on ITGR Integer Profile ( Free Report ) Integer Holdings Corporation operates as a medical device outsource manufacturer in the United States, Puerto Rico, Costa Rica, and internationally. It operates through two segments, Medical and Non-Medical. The company offers products for interventional cardiology, structural heart, heart failure, peripheral vascular, neurovascular, interventional oncology, electrophysiology, vascular access, infusion therapy, hemodialysis, non-vascular, urology, and gastroenterology procedures. Featured Articles Want to see what other hedge funds are holding ITGR? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for Integer Holdings Co. ( NYSE:ITGR – Free Report ). Receive News & Ratings for Integer Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Integer and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .

The cryptocurrency landscape is teeming with innovation, with certain projects emerging as noteworthy for their distinct functionalities and promising growth. Whether it's the realm of decentralized e-commerce, scalable blockchain architectures, or AI-enhanced platforms, the crypto universe is ripe for exploration. This guide focuses on five crypto coins to buy now, namely Web3Bay, Bitget Token, Near Protocol, Render, and Zerebro. Each project presents unique benefits, extending beyond mere speculative opportunities. Let’s delve into the reasons these top crypto coins are noteworthy investments in the current market. 1. Web3Bay: The Future of E-Commerce Web3Bay is reshaping online commerce with its decentralized platform, championing user autonomy, transparency, and security. Central to this venture is the 3BAY token, now in a presale phase priced at $0.003 per token, with an anticipated public launch price of $0.1959, offering substantial early investment potential. The appeal of Web3Bay lies in its utility-driven approach. Token holders gain advantages such as discounts on transactions, a voice in governance, and exclusive ecosystem rewards. Aiming to overhaul the $5 billion Web3 e-commerce sector, Web3Bay is poised as a top crypto coin to invest in. Its easy entry point, strategic tokenomics, and visionary growth plans make it a top crypto coin for those intrigued by the future of decentralized commerce. 2. Bitget Token: A Platform with Perks Bitget Token (BGB) enhances the Bitget exchange experience by providing users with several benefits, including lowered trading fees, early access to new features, and profit-sharing models. With an expanding user community and strategic partnerships like the one with Fiat24, BGB is solidifying its status as a dependable utility token. This commitment to delivering tangible benefits to its holders establishes Bitget Token as a prime crypto coin to invest in today’s marketplace. 3. Render: Decentralized GPU Power Render Token (RNDR) addresses the needs of digital creators requiring GPU resources for complex projects by linking them with underutilized GPU capacities. Gaining momentum in fields like AI, XR, and high-end visual productions, and supported by partnerships with industry giants such as Apple, RNDR stands out. For investors eyeing crypto coins to invest in, Render’s role in digital content creation and its growing influence suggest strong future potential, particularly as the demand for decentralized computing solutions escalates. 3. Near Protocol: Scaling Simplified Near Protocol offers scalable, efficient blockchain solutions, providing low-cost, developer-friendly environments. Its implementation of sharding technology enhances both transaction speed and security, perfect for decentralized applications. Ongoing upgrades and significant alliances, such as Deutsche Telekom’s engagement as a node operator, highlight Near Protocol’s continuous advancement. For those seeking crypto coins to invest in, NEAR’s robust ecosystem and innovation drive render it a compelling choice. 5. Zerebro: AI Meets Blockchain Zerebro fuses AI with blockchain to foster an autonomous content creation and distribution platform, operating across chains like Solana and Polygon. Its sophisticated AI algorithms ensure premium, diverse content generation. Zerebro’s commitment to merging decentralized technology with innovative creativity brands it as an avant-garde platform. For those exploring the top crypto coins to buy now , Zerebro’s integration of AI and blockchain showcases its forward-thinking nature and considerable promise in the burgeoning AI-centric digital landscape. Conclusive Insights The cryptocurrency domain continues to evolve, marked by projects that bring substantial utility and groundbreaking innovation. Web3Bay, Bitget Token, Near Protocol, Render, and Zerebro are notable for their fresh perspectives and intrinsic value across various sectors. From revolutionizing e-commerce to enabling scalable blockchain infrastructures, decentralized GPU rendering, and AI-powered platforms, these top crypto coins present exciting opportunities. Each project underscores the thrilling potential within blockchain technology, inviting engagement with the decentralized systems of tomorrow. Join our WhatsApp Channel to get the latest news, exclusives and videos on WhatsApp _____________ Disclaimer: Analytics Insight does not provide financial advice or guidance. Also note that the cryptocurrencies mentioned/listed on the website could potentially be scams, i.e. designed to induce you to invest financial resources that may be lost forever and not be recoverable once investments are made. You are responsible for conducting your own research (DYOR) before making any investments. Read more here.

NoneTUCSON, Ariz. — Snoop Dogg has nearly as many ties to football as he does to rap music. The entertainer coached youth football for years and created the Snoop League, an after-school program for inner city Los Angeles youths. Snoop has been a guest analyst on football broadcasts and his son, Cordell Broadus, played Division I football. When Snoop took his latest step, becoming the sponsor of a bowl game, he had a demand: Find a way for all players in the game to receive name, image and likeness (NIL) money. “This was Snoop's idea,” said Kym Adair, executive director of the Snoop Dogg Arizona Bowl presented by Gin & Juice. “He was having conversations with people he knows in the college football world and I got a call that said he wants us to be the first bowl to make this commitment and that's what we did.” People are also reading... The beneficiaries are Colorado State and Miami (Ohio), who will conclude their seasons Saturday at Arizona Stadium in the Arizona Bowl. The bowl is classified as a 501(c)(3), so all revenue goes to charity. And, being one of the few bowls not tied to ESPN, it opens the door for unique sponsorship opportunities. The bowl was previously sponsored by Barstool Sports and the digital media company used its own cast of characters on the broadcast, which was streamed on its digital platforms. Snoop Dogg takes over this year. The rapper/entertainer is the latest celebrity to sponsor a bowl, following the footsteps of Jimmy Kimmel and Rob Gronkowski at the LA Bowl. And, Snoop being Snoop, he wanted to put his own spin on his own bowl. “College football fans are exhausted by the constant talk around NIL, conference realignment, coach movement, transfer portal and super conferences,” Snoop said in a video posted on social media. “So it’s time that we get back to the roots of college football — when it was focused on the colleges, the players and the competition, the community, the fan experience and the pageantry.” With that will be an NIL component. The bowl can't pay players just for playing in the bowl, but both teams participated in football clinics on Friday and will get paid for their services. Other bowls have given single players NIL opportunities, but this is believed to be the first to offer it to every player on both teams. “I love the fact that the Arizona Bowl is unique and tries new things, and obviously having Snoop here is unique,” Colorado State coach Jay Norvell said. “The NIL component, it’s the future. It’s what football has become now. We think it’s fantastic for our kids and then the interaction with the kids is the hidden gem of the whole thing.” The NIL component of the Snoop Dogg Arizona Bowl comes a month after a similar effort in The Players Era Festival basketball tournament in Las Vegas. The eight-team tournament said it paid out $9 million in NIL money to participating players for activities outside the competition. It also offered $50 million in NIL opportunities over the next three years for services and activities compliant with NCAA regulations. Are the Players Era Festival and Arizona Bowl the start of a new future? It is not out of the question in big-time college athletics, where schools are already preparing for the era of revenue sharing with players next year. “Revenue sharing between the players and the athletic departments is already on the horizon, so whether that takes the place of these types of arrangements or they're completely separate has yet to be determined," Adair said. "We're just trying to be flexible, ahead of the curve and make an impact any way we can.” Just the way Snoop wants it. Get local news delivered to your inbox!ALEXANDRIA, Va. (AP) — Google, already facing a possible breakup of the company over its ubiquitous search engine , is fighting to beat back another attack by the U.S. Department of Justice alleging monopolistic conduct, this time over technology that puts online advertising in front of consumers. The Justice Department and Google made closing arguments Monday in a trial alleging Google's advertising technology constitutes an illegal monopoly. U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema in Alexandria, Virginia, will decide the case and is expected to issue a written ruling by the end of the year. If Brinkema finds Google has engaged in illegal, monopolistic conduct, she will then hold further hearings to explore what remedies should be imposed. The Justice Department, along with a coalition of states, has already said it believes Google should be forced to sell off parts of its ad tech business, which generates tens of billions of dollars annually for the Mountain View, California-based company. After roughly a month of trial testimony earlier this year, the arguments in the case remain the same. During three hours of arguments Monday, Brinkema, who sometimes tips her hand during legal arguments, did little to indicate how she might rule. She did, though, question the applicability of a key antitrust case Google cites in its defense. The Justice Department contends Google built and maintained a monopoly in “open-web display advertising,” essentially the rectangular ads that appear on the top and right-hand side of the page when one browses websites. Google dominates all facets of the market. A technology called DoubleClick is used pervasively by news sites and other online publishers, while Google Ads maintains a cache of advertisers large and small looking to place their ads on the right webpage in front of the right consumer. In between is another Google product, AdExchange, that conducts nearly instantaneous auctions matching advertisers to publishers. In court papers, Justice Department lawyers say Google “is more concerned with acquiring and preserving its trifecta of monopolies than serving its own publisher and advertiser customers or winning on the merits.” As a result, content providers and news organizations have never been able to generate the online revenue they should due to Google’s excessive fees for brokering transactions between advertisers and publishers, the government says. Google argues the government's case improperly focuses on a narrow niche of online advertising. If one looks more broadly at online advertising to include social media, streaming TV services, and app-based advertising, Google says it controls as little as 10% of the market, a share that is dwindling as it faces increased and evolving competition. Google alleges in court papers that the government’s lawsuit “boil(s) down to the persistent complaints of a handful of Google’s rivals and several mammoth publishers.” Google also says it has invested billions in technology that facilitates the efficient match of advertisers to interested consumers and it should not be forced to share its technology and success with competitors. “Requiring a company to do further engineering work to make its technology and customers accessible by all of its competitors on their preferred terms has never been compelled by U.S. antitrust law,” the company wrote. Brinkema, during Monday's arguments, also sought clarity on Google’s market share, a number the two sides dispute, depending on how broadly the market is defined. Historically, courts have been unwilling to declare an illegal monopoly in markets in which a company holds less than a 70% market share. Google says that when online display advertising is viewed as a whole, it holds only a 10% market share, and dwindling. The Justice Department contends, though, that when focusing on open-web display advertising, Google controls 91% of the market for publisher ad servers and 87% of the market for advertiser ad networks. Google says that the “open web display advertising” market is gerrymandered by the Justice Department to make Google look bad, and that nobody in the industry looks at that category of ads without considering the ability of advertisers to switch to other forms of advertising, like in mobile apps. The Justice Department also contends that the public is harmed by the excessive rates Google charges to facilitate ad purchases, saying the company takes 36 cents on the dollar when it facilitates the transaction end to end. Google says its “take rate” has dropped to 31% and continues to decrease, and it says that rate is lower than that of its competitors. “When you have an integrated system, one of the benefits is lower prices," Google lawyer Karen Dunn said Monday. The Virginia case is separate from an ongoing lawsuit brought against Google in the District of Columbia over its namesake search engine. In that case, the judge determined it constitutes an illegal monopoly but has not decided what remedy to impose. The Justice Department said last week it will seek to force Google to sell its Chrome web browser , among a host of other penalties. Google has said the department's request is overkill and unhinged from legitimate regulation. In Monday's arguments, Justice Department lawyer Aaron Teitelbaum cited the search engine case when he highlighted an email from a Google executive, David Rosenblatt, who said in a 2009 email that Google’s goal was to “do to display what Google did to search," which Teitelbaum said showed the company's intent to achieve market dominance. “Google did not achieve its trifecta of monopolies by accident,” Teitelbaum said.Historic College Football Stadium Blanketed in Snow on Saturday

Stock market today: Wall Street slips as technology stocks drag on the marketNone

Photo: Missouri's Memorial Stadium Blanketed in Snow Ahead of Arkansas CFB GameNone

VIP: What I Learned About the Left While Visiting LondonDATA BREACH ALERT: Edelson Lechtzin LLP Is Investigating Claims On Behalf Of American Addiction ...

SMU feeling good heading into ACC opener against Virginia