首页 > 

49.jili

2025-01-24
LOS ANGELES — Until he sustained a season-ending knee injury last week in the Western Conference final, Galaxy playmaker Riqui Puig was having a tremendous season. So I heard. I watched Puig play only twice this year, once in the Galaxy's season-opening 1-1 draw with Inter Miami and a second time in his team's Fourth of July defeat to LAFC at the Rose Bowl. Outside of short highlight clips on social media, I never saw the former Barcelona prospect, not even when he assisted on the goal that sent the Galaxy to the MLS Cup final. That wasn't a reflection of my interest. Some of my friends will make fun of me for publicly admitting this, but I like Major League Soccer. I covered the league in my first job out of college and have casually kept up with it since. I take my children to a couple of games a year. My 11-year-old son owns Galaxy and LAFC hats but no Dodgers or Lakers merchandise. When flipping through channels in the past, if presented with the choice of, say, college football or MLS, I usually watched MLS. But not this year. While the MLS Cup final between the Galaxy and New York Red Bulls will be shown on Fox and Fox Deportes, the majority of games are now exclusively behind a paywall, courtesy of the league's broadcasting deal with Apple. MLS Season Pass subscriptions were reasonably priced — $79 for the entire season for Apple TV+ subscribers, $99 for non-subscribers — but I was already paying for DirecTV Stream, Netflix, Amazon Prime, PlayStation Plus and who knows what else. MLS became a casualty in my household, as well as in many others, and the possibility of being out of sight and out of mind should be a concern for a league that is looking to expand its audience. Which isn't to say the league made a mistake. This was a gamble MLS had to take. Now in the second year of a 10-year, $2.5 billion deal with Apple, MLS did what Major League Baseball is talking about doing, which is to centralize its broadcasting rights and sell them to a digital platform. Regional sports networks have been decimated by cord cutting, making traditional economic models unsustainable. The move to Apple not only increased the league's broadcast revenues — previous deals with ESPN, Fox and Univision were worth a combined $90 million annually, according to multiple reports — but also introduced a measure of uniformity in the league. The quality of the broadcasts are better than they were under regional sports networks. Viewers know where to watch games and when, as every one of them is on Season Pass and most of them are scheduled to start at 7:30 p.m. local time either on Wednesday or Saturday. "That's been fueling our growth and driving our fan engagement," MLS Commissioner Don Garber said Friday at his annual state of the league address. Apple and MLS declined to reveal the number of League Pass subscribers, but the league provided polling figures that indicated 94% of viewers offered positive or neutral reviews of League Pass. The average viewing time for a game is about 65 minutes for a 90-minute game, according to Garber. In other words, the League Pass is well-liked — by the people who have it. The challenge now is to increase that audience. The launch of League Pass last year coincided with the arrival of Lionel Messi, which presumably resulted in a wave of subscriptions. But the league can't count on the appearance of the next Messi; there is only one of him. MLS pointed to how its fans watch sports on streaming devices or recorded television than any other U.S. sports league, as well as how 71% of its fans are under the age of 45. The league also pointed to how it effectively drew more viewers to the Apple broadcast of Inter Miami's postseason opener with a livestream of a "Messi Cam' on TikTok, indicating further collaborations with wide-reaching entities could be in its future. Garber mentioned how Season Pass is available in other countries. The commissioner also made note of how Apple places games every week in front of its paywall. "What we have, really, is a communication problem," Garber said. "This is new, and we've got to work with Apple, we've got to work with our clubs and we've got to work with our partners to get more exposure to what we think is a great product." The greatest benefit to the league could be Apple's vested interest in improving the on-field product. MLS insiders said Apple has not only encouraged teams to sign more high-profile players but also pushed the league to switch to a fall-to-spring calendar more commonplace in other parts of the world, reasoning that doing so would simplify the process of buying and selling players. The on-field product is what matters. The on-field product is why MLS continues to face competition for viewers from overseas leagues. The on-field product is why the league hasn't succeeded in converting every soccer fan into a MLS fan. And ultimately, if casual viewers such as myself are to pay to watch the Galaxy or LAFC on a screen of some kind, the on-field product will be why. Get local news delivered to your inbox!49.jili

Most Valuable Promotions released a statement Monday regarding the growing controversy that Jake Paul's unanimous decision victory over Mike Tyson was fixed, calling the allegations "illogical and inane." The YouTuber-turned-prizefighter Paul, 27, dominated the iconic former heavyweight champion in their Nov. 15 clash at AT&T Stadium in Arlington, Texas. The event was a massive success with an $18.1 million gate, the largest for any U.S. fight outside of Las Vegas, and was streamed on Netflix with over 108 million live global viewers. However, the 58-year-old Tyson delivered a lackluster performance with skeptics questioning the fight's integrity. Amid the swirling controversy, MVP -- led by Paul and Nakisa Bidarian -- has responded to those questioning whether the fight was fixed for Paul to win. "Both fighters in good faith performed to the best of their abilities with the goal of winning the fight," the statement read. "There were absolutely no restrictions -- contractual or otherwise -- around either fighter. Each boxer was able to use his full arsenal to win the fight. Any agreement to the contrary would violate TDLR (Texas Department of Licensing and Regulations) boxing rules." Social media was flooded with posts suggesting the fight was scripted, with a fake script even being circulated. While the script was debunked, doubt about the legitimacy of the fight persists. Paul's admission that he took his foot off the gas in the middle rounds, rather than pursue a knockout, only fueled suspicions of a rigged fight. "It is further illogical and inane that MVP, in the debut of a hopeful long-term partnership with the world's biggest streamer -- an organization that made its first-ever foray into live professional sports with Paul vs. Tyson -- would even so much as consider such a perverse violation of the rules of competition," the statement continued. Bidarian has remained adamant in many interviews following the fight that there was no foul play in his business partner's victory. "This is not the first time Jake Paul has faced unfounded skepticism or outright disbelief as a professional athlete, and frankly, the claim that his bout must have been rigged is just the latest backhanded compliment to come his way," said Bidarian. "From day one in this sport, people have doubted his abilities -- unable to reconcile how someone with his background has accomplished so much in such a short time. Jake has not only proven himself repeatedly, but he continues to set historic records that speak for themselves. "This event, which broke attendance and viewership milestones for a professional sporting event, is yet another example of his ability to deliver on the biggest stage. As long as Jake continues to exceed expectations, there will always be those who try to discredit his achievements. We embrace the doubt -- it only fuels Jake to work harder and achieve greater success."Broncos can wipe away back-to-back heartbreakers and make playoffs by beating Kansas CityWest Ham surprise Newcastle with 2-0 away win



President-elect Donald Trump on Monday said his incoming administration would slap new tariffs on imported goods from Mexico, Canada and China, fulfilling a key campaign promise that could have a major impact on trade. Trump said in a post on Truth Social that he plans to seek to impose a 25% tariff on products imported from Mexico and Canada, framing the proposed plan as a response to the ongoing fentanyl crisis. "On January 20th, as one of my many first Executive Orders, I will sign all necessary documents to charge Mexico and Canada a 25% Tariff on ALL products coming into the United States, and its ridiculous Open Borders," Trump wrote. "This Tariff will remain in effect until such time as Drugs, in particular Fentanyl, and all Illegal Aliens stop this Invasion of our Country!" Trump said that he would also seek to impose additional tariffs on China. "I have had many talks with China about the massive amounts of drugs, in particular Fentanyl, being sent into the United States — But to no avail," Trump wrote. "Until such time as they stop, we will be charging China an additional 10% Tariff, above any additional Tariffs, on all of their many products coming into the United States of America." Embassies for Canada, China and Mexico did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Monday night. The U.S. and China held high-level talks this year about the fentanyl crisis in an effort to resume counternarcotics cooperation after President Joe Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping met in California last year. Biden also announced he would increase the tariff rate on various goods from China, saying in May that he would increase the tariffs on electric vehicles from 25% to 100% this year. On the campaign trail, Trump declared he would impose 20% blanket tariff on all imports, and add tariffs of at least 60% to Chinese products. During a presidential debate with then-Democratic nominee Kamala Harris, who called Trump's tariffs a "sales tax on the American people," Trump cast the proposed tariffs as a kind of payback. “Other countries are going to finally, after 75 years, pay us back for all that we’ve done for the world, and the tariff will be substantial,” Trump said during the September debate. Any proposed tariffs are likely to receive some pushback from businesses and on Capitol Hill, as NBC News has previously reported . This story first appeared on NBCNews.com . More from NBC News:Releasing Aaron Rodgers prior to June 1 would be a shortsighted move by the New York Jets , immediately hamstringing the new general manager with a devastating 2025 salary cap hit. In "What I'm hearing," The Athletic's Dianna Russini suggested that New York could send Rodgers packing sooner than later. "Some around the league say they won’t be surprised if Rodgers is cut in-season," said Russini . Other than embarrass Rodgers, releasing the quarterback within the next few weeks accomplishes nothing except put the Jets on the hook for $49 million in dead salary cap space in 2025. According to figures posted by sports news outlet uStadium , a pre-June 1 cut would mean New York would have to absorb the full dead cap hit next season. If they wait until after June 1 in the new league year, the Jets can spread the charge out in the form of $14 million in 2025 and $35 million in 2026. The salary cap will escalate over the next two years as the NFL continues to build its media rights revenues, so $35 million in 2025 will hit harder than in 2026. Right now, each team must comply with a $255.4 million spending limit. That number is projected to jump to $273.3 million next season. In 2026, it's scheduled to increase to $290 million. Cutting Rodgers right now would mean that the quarterback would occupy 18 percent of the Jets' 2025 salary cap space despite not even being on the team. RELATED: Jets' next game could be the last for 'disastrous' Aaron Rodgers experiment If New York is content with low expectations next year, owner Woody Johnson could elect to dismiss Rodgers early and all but sacrifice the 2025 campaign before it starts. There's speculation from multiple sources that Rodgers has been playing hurt over the past seven games. He ranks 30th amongst qualifying quarterbacks in yards per attempt (6.4) and hasn't shown the ability to stretch the field. Rodgers and the Jets (3-8) will be playing for their postseason lives on December 1 against the Seattle Seahawks at MetLife Stadium. More New York Jets News: • Ex-Jets' QB Ryan Fitzpatrick drags Aaron Rodgers, Jets • Why Woody Johnson finally fired Joe Douglas • Jets urged to make smart personnel move now with eye on future • Who is New York Jets' interim general manager Phil Savage? • Three serious candidates for Jets' head coaching job

In 1949, Oldsmobile produced what is often considered the first-ever muscle car, the Oldsmobile Rocket 88 . Powered by a 303-cubic-inch (4.9L) V8 making 135 horsepower and 263 lb-ft of torque, it won 10 of the 19 races in the 1950 NASCAR season. Oldsmobile continued to develop the Rocket 88 until, by the early 1960s, the fuse it lit exploded into a glorious burst of V8 mayhem and timeless auto design. The introduction of cars like the Ford Mustang , Pontiac Tempest GTO, and Plymouth Barracuda in the early '60s revealed insane demand among youth for powerful vehicles with V8 power. Other auto manufacturers scrambled to keep up. What followed was nothing less than a golden era of American auto-manufacturing that produced some of the most timeless and desirable vehicles of all time. By 1966, Dodge was ready to enter the ring. Its prize fighter was a curiously designed and aggressively monikered mid-sized muscle car. Through a career spanning nearly six decades, the Dodge Charger has had its ups and downs. But while its future may be cloudy, it has earned a place in the pantheon of iconic American muscle. The Charger arrived for the 1966 model year with a bit of an identity crisis. Dodge designers lifted the Mustang's popular fastback design for its medium-sized two-door muscle car. An awkward mix of old and new design, it looked something like a Dodge Polara with a fastback welded on as an afterthought. Nonetheless, the two-door Charger aimed to capture the market salivating over Chevelles and 442s. Tipping the scales at 3,500 pounds, it couldn't hang with lighter pony cars (a 1966 Mustang weighed between 2,500 and 3,000 pounds). Dodge offered five engine choices, starting with a 318-cubic-inch (5.2L) that made 230 brake horsepower. The middleweight engines ranged from 361 cubic inches (5.9L), making 265 horsepower, to 383 cubic inches (6.3L), making 325 horsepower. These were respectable numbers for the day, but the star was the top-of-the-line 426-cubic-inch (7.0L) Hemi that put a pep in the Charger's step to the tune of 425 horsepower. Hemi engines had been in the lineup since the early 1950s, but in the Charger, Chrysler would find a vehicle (pun intended) that would carry the beloved engine deep into the 20th century. Still, the first-generation Charger was a sales disappointment. Between 1966 and 1967, Dodge sold approximately 53,000 Chargers, while Competitor Chevrolet sold over 400,000 Chevelles in 1966 alone. The Charger had a steep hill to climb, but it was up to the challenge. Paltry sales notwithstanding, Chrysler gave Dodge the green light for a second generation. It was evident from the start that the first-generation Charger had room for improvement. After an ultra-short two-year run, Dodge released the second generation for the 1968 model year, and it make some progress. Out was the somewhat stodgy first-gen design ethos. Though Dodge kept the fastback, the rest of the vehicle presented squared-off lines, muscularly curved haunches, and an aggressive stance that suggested Dodge was finished messing around. With a broader array of engine options, including an available in-line 224-cubic-inch (3.6L) six-cylinder making 145 horsepower up to the 330-horsepower, 383 cubic-inch(6.3L) V8, the king of the heap was still Hemi. By the 1969 introduction of the Charger Daytona, which came with a 439-cubic-inch (7.2L) Magnum V8, buyers willing to shell out the extra cash for the upgrade could score the more powerful 425 horsepower Hemi 426 (7.0L)package. The Charger was still a hog — the 1970 model weighed 3,800 pounds — but it was unapologetic about what it was. It fit in nicely amongst the Skylarks, Chevelles, and GTOS of the day. The second-generation Charger is arguably the most iconic; the average used sale price for one hovers around $150,000 today. Dodge hoped to move 35,000 of the new model in the first year and ended up selling over 96,000. The Charger name had caught on, but world events were about to turn the muscle era on its head. [Featured image by BUTTON74 via Wikimedia Commons | Cropped and scaled | CC BY-SA 4.0 ] As the third-generation Charger made its debut in 1971, it marked a significant transition in the automotive landscape. The era of high-displacement muscle cars was waning, largely due to the impact of government emission regulations such as the 1970 Clean Air Act. This legislation effectively put an end to the "no-replacement-for-displacement" philosophy, signaling the onset of a new era of automotive design and performance. The looming oil crises of the '70s and '80s further underscored the changing times. The third-gen Charger was a worthy last gasp of an unforgettable era. Though Dodge kept a 110 horsepower in-line six option in the works, performance honks gravitated toward the V8s, which remained very much in play despite the burgeoning governmental restriction. The Daytona was out as a performance model, replaced by the Road and Track (R/T) for 1971 and 1972. The top-tier performers could muster up to 390 horsepower via one of the most well-regarded and fondly remembered V8s of the day: a 440 -cubic-inch (7.2L) setup with the vaunted "six-pack" — a trio of double-barreled carburetors — feeding the engine. The glory days of muscle were fast fading by the time the final third-generation Charger rolled off the assembly line, but Dodge had worked hard to earn the Charger a name in the game. They weren't about to give up on the nameplate altogether. [Featured image by Torsten Koch via Wikimedia Commons | Cropped and scaled | CC BY 3.0 ] With the prime muscle car era coming to an end, Dodge shifted its vision for the Charger. The last of the B-body vehicles would pivot toward the luxury segment. Only a faint aesthetic echo of the previous generation remained. The 1975 Charger looked more like something that would blow up with a mobster inside than a true-blue muscle car. Dodge gave buyers of its reborn luxury coupe options, including a landau (think vinyl, but classier) roof, a wood grain interior, and a body that stretched 10 inches longer than the previous iteration despite retaining the two-door design. The mid-'70s were in full swing, and the result was a collection of Chargers that lacked the electrifying charge of their predecessors. The Daytona made a comeback between 1975 and 1977, albeit in diminished form. The powertrains sounded appropriately muscular with engine options including 318- (5.2L), 360- (5.9L), and 400-cubic-inch (6.5L) V8s, but even the top-tier 1978 SE model with the 400-cubic-inch engine managed a measly 190 horsepower against a curb weight of 4,184 pounds. The fourth generation seemed to be the beginning of the end for the Charger. Pollution regulation had eviscerated the American V8, and the 1979 oil crisis was right around the corner. After 1978, the nameplate went on hiatus. It would not be until 1982 that it reappeared in a drastically different form. [Featured image by Greg Gjerdingen via Wikimedia Commons | Cropped and scaled | CC BY 2.0 ] If the fourth generation abandoned what made the Charger great in the first place, fans would barely recognize the nameplate upon its return in 1981. At first glance, the new Charger resembled the third-generation Ford Mustang . Based on the "Omnirizon" platform that served as the base of the Dodge Omni and Plymouth Horizon, the reborn Charger was anything but. The engine compartment harbored a dark secret: a transverse-mounted four-cylinder sending between 62 and 94 horsepower to the — brace for it — front wheels. The nameplate that offered only V8s in 1966 offered 1.6 and 2.2L four-cylinders in 1981, but there was a glimmer of hope in the form of Carrol Shelby. With his help, Dodge introduced the turbocharged, manual-only Shelby Charger for the 1983 model year. Making 107 horsepower at 5,600 rpm, it claimed a top speed of 117 mph, quarter-mile time in the 16-second range, and, crucially, achieved 22 mpg. It wasn't bad for what it was. While the Mustangs and Camaros of the world tried to retain some semblance of V8 power, the Charger simply went another route. Chrysler needed a car it could sell to the masses en masse, and fuel efficiency was the name of the game. After squeezing what it could from the platform, Dodge discontinued the Charger once again after the 1987 model year, and this time, it looked like it was for good. [Featured image by Angela2019 via Wikimedia Commons | Cropped and scaled | CC0 ] The Dodge Charger wore many hats throughout its spotty career. It arrived late to the muscle car party with outdated styling, morphed into a piston-thumping, asphalt-shredding Mopar legend, relaxed into a luxury car, and sipped gas as an efficiency coupe. As much as the Charger evolved, it had always been a coupe. Until Dodge announced its return, promising "modern coupe styling with four-door functionality." The new Charger would rise from the dead as a sedan. The move may have angered purists, but at least the Charger was returning to something resembling its old form. Technology had finally caught up with emission and regulatory demands, and affordable, powerful vehicles with large-displacement engines were possible again. From 2006 to 2010, a Charger worthy of the name returned to the fold. The base 2006 iteration hit the streets with a 2.7L V6, making 193 horsepower, a vast improvement over the 1980s vintage. It even offered a return to the Hemi with an available 348-cubic-inch (5.7L) V8 Hemi with 345 horsepower. Dodge's iconic performance division, Street and Racing Technology (SRT) , had finally coalesced into a single unit, and it had plans for the Charger. By the end of the generation in 2010, the top-of-the-line Charger SRT-8 made 431 horsepower via a 372-cubic-inch (6.1L). Even better, the Charger finally found its place. After many iterations, the 7th generation Charger would prove the most successful of all time. [Featured image by IFCAR via Wikimedia Commons | Cropped and scaled | CC0 ] The Charger's outsized role in automotive history belies its shifting identity. The first generation lasted only two years, and even the longest-running Charger lived only six years between 1981 and 1987. The Charger found its footing as a sedan, and Dodge was determined to make the most of it. As the Charger forged into the second decade of the 21st century, it received cosmetic and functional changes, including interior upgrades, a more aggressive profile, and better visibility. The engine packages for 2011 included a new 220cubic-inch (3.6L) Pentastar V6, making a respectable 292 horsepower, up to an R/T model with a 348 (5.7L) Hemi. However, it would be the SRT division that defined the generation. The 2015 Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat arrived snorting 707 horsepower and 650 lb-ft of torque. For the next decade, the Charger Hellcat set the standard for affordable American power at levels bordering on lunatic. SRT kept on with its collective madness until the 2023 model, by which time the Charger SRT Hellcat Redeye put down 807 horsepower and 707 lb-ft of torque to anyone willing to plunk down the money. After a 12-year production run that doubled the length of any previous iteration, Dodge put the seventh generation, but not the nameplate, to bed. [Featured image by Tuner tom via Wikimedia Commons | Cropped and scaled | CC BY-SA 4.0 ] Now that the Charger had finally settled into its identity as a sedan, Dodge did what it has historically done and changed everything. In March 2024, the 8th-generation Charger hit the scene in a variety of flavors, including a coupe edition and all-electric versions. The Charger Daytona R/T and Daytona Scat Pack returned as EV-only coupes. The more powerful Scat Pack edition promised 670 horsepower. Never fear, fans of internal combustion; the latest Charger also comes burning old-fashioned gasoline, though not via the good ol' Hemi V8 that served it so well. Instead, a twin-turbo in-line six-cylinder offers two versions, the more powerful of which achieves 550 horsepower. Dodge expects to put out the ICE and sedans beginning in 2025. Fans of the Charger, whether from the pavement-pounding days of the late '60s or the tire-shredding versions that arrived in the 2010s, can expect Dodge to continue offering powerful Chargers, even if they make power in an entirely different way. The Charger has proven malleable over the years. It celebrates its 60th birthday in 2026, production interruptions notwithstanding, and has changed nearly as much as the auto industry. If the Charger has proven anything over its illustrious career, it's that there will always be a place for cars that pack a punch. Its enduring appeal, marked by a surprising and perhaps unnecessary amount of power, is a testament to Dodge's commitment to producing high-performance vehicles.Texans WR Nico Collins says he was fined for tossing TD ball to kid

Previous: 50jili com login
Next: 80jili.ph