首页 > 

lucky cola online casino

2025-01-26
US to send $1.25 billion in weapons to Ukraine, pushing to get aid out before Biden leaves officeCHICAGO (AP) — When the Chicago Bears threatened to score in the closing minutes of a 6-3 loss to the Seattle Seahawks on Thursday, fans expressed their feelings loud and clear. Read this article for free: Already have an account? To continue reading, please subscribe: * CHICAGO (AP) — When the Chicago Bears threatened to score in the closing minutes of a 6-3 loss to the Seattle Seahawks on Thursday, fans expressed their feelings loud and clear. Read unlimited articles for free today: Already have an account? CHICAGO (AP) — When the Chicago Bears threatened to score in the closing minutes of a 6-3 loss to the Seattle Seahawks on Thursday, fans expressed their feelings loud and clear. They weren’t cheering for a touchdown or field goal. They had something else in mind. “Sell the team!” they chanted. With their skid at 10 games, a season that started with playoff hopes can’t end soon enough for the Bears (4-12). They will wrap it up when they visit the rival Green Bay Packers on Jan. 5. “My job is to go out there and win games,” quarterback Caleb Williams said. “And we don’t focus on the outside noise. The fans are going to cheer and maybe boo sometimes. And you can’t react to that. It’s not something that we react to.” Chicago is 14-36 in three seasons under general manager Ryan Poles and has two double-digit losing streaks. The Bears dropped their final 10 in 2022 when they were tanking as part of a franchise-record 14-game skid that stretched into last year. They’ve never lost more than 10 in a row in a single season. The slide was at six games when they fired former coach Matt Eberflus the day after a loss at Detroit on Thanksgiving, following a series of poor late-game decisions. They’re 0-4 under interim coach Thomas Brown, and they’ve been dominated by Green Bay in recent decades. What’s working The defense. A defense that has gone from ranking seventh in yards per game through the first six weeks to 25th did its part against Seattle. The six points allowed were a season-low and the 265 yards the Bears gave up were their second-lowest. “As we know, our defense has a certain standard and we’ve showed it,” cornerback Kyler Gordon said. “So, obviously syncing a little bit. Just getting back on the guys to get back right. It’s just important to know what we can do and just go in there and execute.” What needs help Pass protection. Williams was sacked seven times, bringing his NFL-leading total and individual franchise record to 67. The Bears broke their previous mark of 66 sacks allowed in 2004, when they used four quarterbacks. Their issues on the offensive line are well-documented. And so is Williams’ tendency to hold onto the ball too long, resulting in unnecessary sacks. “There were miscues,” Williams said. “There were stupid sacks that I was taking, losing 10, 14 yards, which is frustrating. But I will say that I will definitely take the heat for this one just because (of) some of the situations that I put us in.” Stock up DE Montez Sweat. The Bears gave up 53 yards rushing on Seattle’s game-opening field-goal drive. But the line performed better after that. Sweat picked up his first sack since Week 12 against Minnesota on the first play of Seattle’s second possession, when he took down Geno Smith for an 8-yard loss. Though he’s only missed one game, Sweat has been slowed by ankle and shin injuries. His 5 1/2 sacks are a big drop from last season, when he had a combined 12 1/2 for Washington and Chicago while becoming the first NFL player to lead two teams in the same season. Stock down Williams. Coming off a promising outing against NFC leader Detroit that followed some shaky outings, Williams had a rough night. The No. 1 overall draft pick completed 16 of 28 passes for 122 yards — not much more than his low of 93 in a Week 1 win over Tennessee — after throwing for 334 yards and two touchdowns against the Lions. The seven sacks for 46 yards both matched his second-highest totals. Injuries The Bears reported no injuries during the game. Key number Winnipeg Jets Game Days On Winnipeg Jets game days, hockey writers Mike McIntyre and Ken Wiebe send news, notes and quotes from the morning skate, as well as injury updates and lineup decisions. Arrives a few hours prior to puck drop. 5 — The Bears once again had trouble sustaining drives, converting just 5 of 15 third downs and punting on seven of their 10 possessions. They tied a season low with 11 first downs and managed 179 yards. Chicago owns the NFL’s second-worst third-down conversion rate at 31.8% and is averaging a league-worst 287.3 yards per game. Next steps The Bears have lost 11 straight against the Packers — the longest streak by either team in the storied rivalry — and 26 of 29 counting the playoffs. They’ve dropped eight in a row at Lambeau Field since a win in 2015. ___ AP NFL: https://apnews.com/hub/NFL Advertisement AdvertisementWEST PALM BEACH, Fla. (AP) — An online spat between factions of Donald Trump's supporters over immigration and the tech industry has thrown internal divisions in his political movement into public display, previewing the fissures and contradictory views his coalition could bring to the White House. The rift laid bare the tensions between the newest flank of Trump's movement — wealthy members of the tech world including billionaire Elon Musk and fellow entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy and their call for more highly skilled workers in their industry — and people in Trump's Make America Great Again base who championed his hardline immigration policies. The debate touched off this week when Laura Loomer , a right-wing provocateur with a history of racist and conspiratorial comments, criticized Trump’s selection of Sriram Krishnan as an adviser on artificial intelligence policy in his coming administration. Krishnan favors the ability to bring more skilled immigrants into the U.S. Loomer declared the stance to be “not America First policy” and said the tech executives who have aligned themselves with Trump were doing so to enrich themselves. Much of the debate played out on the social media network X, which Musk owns. Loomer's comments sparked a back-and-forth with venture capitalist and former PayPal executive David Sacks , whom Trump has tapped to be the “White House A.I. & Crypto Czar." Musk and Ramaswamy, whom Trump has tasked with finding ways to cut the federal government , weighed in, defending the tech industry's need to bring in foreign workers. It bloomed into a larger debate with more figures from the hard-right weighing in about the need to hire U.S. workers, whether values in American culture can produce the best engineers, free speech on the internet, the newfound influence tech figures have in Trump's world and what his political movement stands for. Trump has not yet weighed in on the rift, and his presidential transition team did not respond to a message seeking comment. Musk, the world's richest man who has grown remarkably close to the president-elect , was a central figure in the debate, not only for his stature in Trump's movement but his stance on the tech industry's hiring of foreign workers. Technology companies say H-1B visas for skilled workers, used by software engineers and others in the tech industry, are critical for hard-to-fill positions. But critics have said they undercut U.S. citizens who could take those jobs. Some on the right have called for the program to be eliminated, not expanded. Born in South Africa, Musk was once on an a H-1B visa himself and defended the industry's need to bring in foreign workers. “There is a permanent shortage of excellent engineering talent," he said in a post. “It is the fundamental limiting factor in Silicon Valley.” Trump's own positions over the years have reflected the divide in his movement. His tough immigration policies, including his pledge for a mass deportation, were central to his winning presidential campaign. He has focused on immigrants who come into the U.S. illegally but he has also sought curbs on legal immigration , including family-based visas. As a presidential candidate in 2016, Trump called the H-1B visa program “very bad” and “unfair” for U.S. workers. After he became president, Trump in 2017 issued a “Buy American and Hire American” executive order , which directed Cabinet members to suggest changes to ensure H-1B visas were awarded to the highest-paid or most-skilled applicants to protect American workers. Trump's businesses, however, have hired foreign workers, including waiters and cooks at his Mar-a-Lago club , and his social media company behind his Truth Social app has used the the H-1B program for highly skilled workers. During his 2024 campaign for president, as he made immigration his signature issue, Trump said immigrants in the country illegally are “poisoning the blood of our country" and promised to carry out the largest deportation operation in U.S. history. But in a sharp departure from his usual alarmist message around immigration generally, Trump told a podcast this year that he wants to give automatic green cards to foreign students who graduate from U.S. colleges. “I think you should get automatically, as part of your diploma, a green card to be able to stay in this country," he told the “All-In" podcast with people from the venture capital and technology world. Those comments came on the cusp of Trump's budding alliance with tech industry figures, but he did not make the idea a regular part of his campaign message or detail any plans to pursue such changes.lucky cola online casino

BusPatrol Recognized Among Fastest-Growing Companies in North America on the 2024 Deloitte ...SILICON SLOPES, Utah--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Dec 5, 2024-- (Nasdaq: DOMO) today announced results for its fiscal third quarter ended October 31, 2024. “Our focus on ecosystem-led growth, consumption-based contracts and AI innovation is paying off with promising momentum, as we see more demand for Domo as an anchor technology in customers’ data stacks,” said Josh James, founder and CEO, Domo. “The data and AI landscape is evolving to create new market opportunities for Domo, and we feel confident we’re in the right position to capitalize on this moment.” We believe the following announcements and recognition demonstrate our commitment to product innovation and customer value: Based on information available as of December 5, 2024, Domo is providing the following guidance for its fourth quarter of fiscal 2025 and full year fiscal 2025: Q4 Fiscal 2025 Full Year Fiscal 2025 We have not reconciled guidance for non-GAAP metrics to their most directly comparable GAAP measures because certain items that impact these measures are not within our control or cannot be reasonably predicted. Domo plans to host a conference call today to review its fiscal 2025 third quarter financial results and to discuss its financial outlook. The call is scheduled to begin at 3:00 p.m. MT/ 5:00 p.m. ET. A live webcast of the event will be available on the Domo Investor Relations website at and a live dial-in is available at (877) 484-6065 or (201) 689-8846. A replay will be available at (877) 660-6853 or (201) 612-7415 with the access ID#13750075 following the completion of the conference call until 11:59 p.m. (ET) January 4, 2025. Domo puts data to work for everyone so they can multiply their impact on the business. Our cloud-native data experience platform goes beyond traditional business intelligence and analytics, making data visible and actionable with user-friendly dashboards and apps. Underpinned by AI, data science and a secure data foundation that connects with existing cloud and legacy systems, Domo helps companies optimize critical business processes at scale and in record time to spark the bold curiosity that powers exponential business results. For more information, visit . You can also follow Domo on , and . Domo investors and others should note that we announce material information to the public about our company, products and services, and other issues through a variety of means, including Domo’s website, press releases, filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), blogs and social media, in order to achieve broad, non-exclusionary distribution of information to the public. We intend to use the , the , the , the X account and the X account as a means of disclosing information about the Company and its services and for complying with the disclosure obligations under Regulation FD. The information we post through these social media channels may be deemed material. Accordingly, we encourage investors and others to monitor these social media channels in addition to following our press releases, SEC filings and public conference calls and webcasts. The social media channels that we intend to use as a means of disclosing the information described here may be updated from time to time as listed on our investor relations webpage. To supplement our condensed consolidated financial statements, which are prepared and presented in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States of America (GAAP), we reference in this press release and the accompanying tables the following non-GAAP financial measures: non-GAAP subscription gross margin, non-GAAP operating expenses, non-GAAP operating loss, non-GAAP operating margin, non-GAAP net loss, non-GAAP net loss per share, billings, and adjusted free cash flow. In computing the measures other than billings and adjusted free cash flow, we exclude the effects of stock-based compensation expense, amortization of certain intangible assets, severance of executive officers who report to the Chief Executive Officer, loss on extinguishment of debt, and remeasurement of warrant liability. Billings is defined as total revenue plus the change in deferred revenue in a period. In computing adjusted free cash flow, we exclude the effects of proceeds from shares issued in connection with the employee stock purchase plan, purchases of property and equipment, and net change in short-term payable financing. As it relates to adjusted free cash flow, we add back amounts equal to the proceeds from shares issued in connection with employee stock purchase plan to reflect the non-cash nature of these transactions. Because no cash is exchanged in these transactions, showing proceeds in the financing section of the statement of cash flows as required by GAAP results in a corresponding decrease in the operating section, which management believes is not indicative of actual cash used in or provided by our operations. We also add back the net change to short-term payable financing to adjusted free cash flow. We believe that this non-GAAP cash metric is useful because it provides investors with the same information that management uses to consistently evaluate, forecast and measure the Company’s actual cash flows and its ability to achieve and maintain positive cash flows. We use these non-GAAP financial measures for financial and operational decision-making and as a means to evaluate period-to-period comparisons. Our management believes that these non-GAAP financial measures provide meaningful supplemental information regarding our performance and liquidity by excluding certain items that may not be indicative of our ongoing core business operating results. We believe that both management and investors benefit from referring to these non-GAAP financial measures in assessing our performance and when analyzing historical performance and liquidity and planning, forecasting, and analyzing future periods. For a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP measures, please see the tables captioned "Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures" included at the end of this release. This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements include statements of our Chief Executive Officer, statements regarding competitive positions, our financial outlook for our fourth fiscal quarter, and results for future periods. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties and are based on potentially inaccurate assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expected or implied by the forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from the results predicted, and reported results should not be considered as an indication of future performance. The potential risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ from the results predicted include, among others, those risks and uncertainties included under the caption "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in our filings with the SEC, including, without limitation, the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 28, 2024 and the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2024 expected to be filed with the SEC on or about December 10, 2024. All information provided in this release and in the attachments is as of the date hereof, and we undertake no duty to update this information unless required by law. Domo is a registered trademark of Domo, Inc. $ 71,293 $ 71,113 $ 213,594 $ 214,144 8,382 8,651 25,211 24,130 79,675 79,764 238,805 238,274 11,523 13,334 33,588 39,410 7,253 6,627 22,847 21,389 18,776 19,961 56,435 60,799 60,899 59,803 182,370 177,475 40,262 37,194 124,464 116,040 19,729 21,264 63,931 65,952 12,130 12,429 35,509 42,504 72,121 70,887 223,904 224,496 (11,222 ) (11,084 ) (41,534 ) (47,021 ) - (1,850 ) - (1,850 ) (4,930 ) (5,622 ) (14,549 ) (14,805 ) (4,930 ) (7,472 ) (14,549 ) (16,655 ) (16,152 ) (18,556 ) (56,083 ) (63,676 ) 261 205 801 582 $ (16,413 ) $ (18,761 ) $ (56,884 ) $ (64,258 ) $ (0.45 ) $ (0.48 ) $ (1.59 ) $ (1.68 ) 36,310 38,832 35,812 38,243 $ 670 $ 784 $ 1,958 $ 2,389 359 295 1,311 942 6,364 4,754 19,260 15,238 4,621 4,038 14,214 12,529 4,174 3,080 10,642 12,075 181 210 516 603 $ 16,369 $ 13,161 $ 47,901 $ 43,776 $ 20 $ 142 $ 60 $ 426 $ - $ - $ 443 $ - - - 1,553 - $ - $ - $ 1,996 $ - $ - $ 455 $ - $ 33 $ 60,939 $ 40,925 67,197 57,177 16,006 15,288 9,602 7,083 153,744 120,473 27,003 27,937 11,746 10,108 19,542 17,420 2,740 2,267 9,478 9,478 1,407 2,528 $ 225,660 $ 190,211 $ 4,313 $ 8,403 43,430 58,392 4,807 5,506 185,250 153,919 237,800 226,220 11,135 8,125 2,736 3,311 14,001 8,151 113,534 115,574 379,206 361,381 37 39 1,252,200 1,298,596 (180 ) 56 (1,405,603 ) (1,469,861 ) (153,546 ) (171,170 ) $ 225,660 $ 190,211 $ (16,413 ) $ (18,761 ) $ (56,884 ) $ (64,258 ) 1,636 2,254 4,738 7,117 1,063 1,142 3,235 3,320 4,398 4,454 13,354 13,181 16,369 13,161 47,901 43,776 - 1,850 - 1,850 - 456 - 33 1,072 2,390 3,643 4,334 (3,022 ) (8,489 ) 23,750 10,020 (4,016 ) (4,524 ) (10,921 ) (10,328 ) 291 1,543 (173 ) 1,819 998 (11,655 ) (966 ) (152 ) (1,237 ) (1,392 ) (4,054 ) (4,000 ) (608 ) 10,238 (3,361 ) 6,073 (4,856 ) (6,368 ) (23,124 ) (30,756 ) (4,325 ) (13,701 ) (2,862 ) (17,971 ) (2,714 ) (2,515 ) (9,214 ) (7,245 ) - - (26 ) - (2,714 ) (2,515 ) (9,240 ) (7,245 ) - (402 ) - (402 ) 1,374 789 3,406 1,910 - (296 ) - (504 ) - 52,758 - 52,758 - (53,177 ) - (53,177 ) - 6,190 - 8,972 - (4,536 ) - (4,536 ) 62 - 65 - 1,436 1,326 3,471 5,021 (862 ) 111 (482 ) 181 (6,465 ) (14,779 ) (9,113 ) (20,014 ) 63,852 55,704 66,500 60,939 $ 57,387 $ 40,925 $ 57,387 $ 40,925 $ 71,293 $ 71,113 $ 213,594 $ 214,144 11,523 13,334 33,588 39,410 59,770 57,779 180,006 174,734 84 % 81 % 84 % 82 % 670 784 1,958 2,389 $ 60,440 $ 58,563 $ 181,964 $ 177,123 85 % 82 % 85 % 83 % $ 72,121 $ 70,887 $ 223,904 $ 224,496 (15,159 ) (11,872 ) (44,116 ) (39,842 ) (20 ) (142 ) (60 ) (426 ) - - (1,996 ) - $ 56,942 $ 58,873 $ 177,732 $ 184,228 $ (11,222 ) $ (11,084 ) $ (41,534 ) $ (47,021 ) 16,188 12,951 47,385 43,173 20 142 60 426 - - 1,996 - $ 4,986 $ 2,009 $ 7,907 $ (3,422 ) (14 )% (14 )% (17 )% (20 )% 20 17 19 19 - - 1 - 6 % 3 % 3 % (1 )% $ (16,413 ) $ (18,761 ) $ (56,884 ) $ (64,258 ) 16,369 13,161 47,901 43,776 20 142 60 426 - - 1,996 - - 1,850 - 1,850 - 455 - 33 $ (24 ) $ (3,153 ) $ (6,927 ) $ (18,173 ) $ (0.45 ) $ (0.48 ) $ (1.59 ) $ (1.68 ) 0.45 0.34 1.34 1.15 — — 0.06 — — 0.05 — 0.05 — 0.01 — — $ — $ (0.08 ) $ (0.19 ) $ (0.48 ) $ 79,675 $ 79,764 $ 238,805 $ 238,274 158,522 153,919 158,522 153,919 4,236 3,311 4,236 3,311 (164,882 ) (161,601 ) (182,273 ) (185,250 ) (2,732 ) (1,997 ) (3,609 ) (2,736 ) (4,856 ) (6,368 ) (23,124 ) (30,756 ) $ 74,819 $ 73,396 $ 215,681 $ 207,518 $ (4,325 ) $ (13,701 ) $ (2,862 ) $ (17,971 ) 1,374 789 3,406 1,910 (2,714 ) (2,515 ) (9,214 ) (7,245 ) - 6,190 - 8,972 - (4,536 ) - (4,536 ) $ (5,665 ) $ (13,773 ) $ (8,670 ) $ (18,870 ) View source version on : CONTACT: Media – Cynthia Cowen – Peter Lowry KEYWORD: UTAH UNITED STATES NORTH AMERICA INDUSTRY KEYWORD: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DATA MANAGEMENT DATA ANALYTICS TECHNOLOGY SOFTWARE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INTERNET SOURCE: Domo, Inc. Copyright Business Wire 2024. PUB: 12/05/2024 04:05 PM/DISC: 12/05/2024 04:06 PM

By LOLITA C. BALDOR and MATTHEW LEE WASHINGTON (AP) — The United States is expected to announce that it will send $1.25 billion in military assistance to Ukraine, U.S. officials said Friday, as the Biden administration pushes to get as much aid to Kyiv as possible before leaving office on Jan. 20. The large package of aid includes a significant amount of munitions, including for the National Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile Systems and the HAWK air defense system. It also will provide Stinger missiles and 155 mm- and 105 mm artillery rounds, officials said. The officials, who said they expect the announcement to be made on Monday, spoke on condition of anonymity to provide details not yet made public. The new aid comes as Russia has launched a barrage of attacks against Ukraine’s power facilities in recent days, although Ukraine has said it intercepted a significant number of the missiles and drones. Russian and Ukrainian forces are also still in a bitter battle around the Russian border region of Kursk, where Moscow has sent thousands of North Korean troops to help reclaim territory taken by Ukraine. Earlier this month, senior defense officials acknowledged that that the Defense Department may not be able to send all of the remaining $5.6 billion in Pentagon weapons and equipment stocks passed by Congress for Ukraine before President-elect Donald Trump is sworn in. Related Articles National News | Bird flu virus likely mutated within a Louisiana patient, CDC says National News | A 9th telecoms firm has been hit by a massive Chinese espionage campaign, the White House says National News | Court rules Georgia lawmakers can subpoena Fani Willis for information related to her Trump case National News | US homelessness up 18% as affordable housing remains out of reach for many people National News | Most Americans blame insurance profits and denials alongside the killer in UHC CEO death, poll finds Trump has talked about getting some type of negotiated settlement between Ukraine and Russia, and spoken about his relationship with Russian President Vladimir Putin . Many U.S. and European leaders are concerned that it might result in a poor deal for Ukraine and they worry that he won’t provide Ukraine with all the weapons funding approved by Congress. The aid in the new package is in presidential drawdown authority, which allows the Pentagon to take weapons off the shelves and send them quickly to Ukraine. This latest assistance would reduce the remaining amount to about $4.35 billion. Officials have said they hope that an influx of aid will help strengthen Ukraine’s hand, should Zelenskyy decide it’s time to negotiate. One senior defense official said that while the U.S. will continue to provide weapons to Ukraine until Jan. 20, there may well be funds remaining that will be available for the incoming Trump administration to spend. According to the Pentagon, there is also about $1.2 billion remaining in longer-term funding through the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative, which is used to pay for weapons contracts that would not be delivered for a year or more. Officials have said the administration anticipates releasing all of that money before the end of the calendar year. If the new package is included, the U.S. has provided more than $64 billion in security assistance to Ukraine since Russia invaded in February 2022.NoneThe study, released Tuesday by the Brennan Center for Justice, looked at 21 states with federally recognized tribal lands that have a population of at least 5,000 and where more than 20% of residents identify as American Indian or Alaska Native. Researchers found that between 2012 and 2022, voter participation in federal elections was 7 percentage points lower in midterms and 15 percentage points lower in presidential elections than among those living off tribal lands in the same states. Earlier studies show voter turnout for communities of color is higher in areas where their ethnic group is the majority, but the latest research found that turnout was the lowest on tribal lands that have a high concentration of Native Americans, the Brennan Center said. “There’s something more intensely happening in Native American communities on tribal land,” said Chelsea Jones, a researcher on the study. Jones said the study suggests some barriers may be insurmountable in predominately Native communities due to a lack of adequate polling places or access to early and mail-in ballots. Many residents on tribal lands have nontraditional addresses, meaning they don't have street names or house numbers, making mail-in voting even more difficult. As a result, many Native American voters rely on P.O. boxes, but the study notes that several jurisdictions will not mail ballots to P.O. boxes. Long distances to the polls that do exist on tribal lands and little to no public transportation creates additional hurdles for Native American voters. In far-flung Alaska Native villages, polling places sometimes simply don't open if there's no one available to run an election, and severe weather can make absentee voting unreliable, The Associated Press reported last month. “When you think about people who live on tribal lands having to go 30, 60, 100 miles (up to 160 kilometers) to cast a ballot, that is an extremely limiting predicament to be in," Jones said. "These are really, truly severe barriers.” Additionally, Jones said they found Native American voters were denied the ability to vote using their tribal IDs in several places, including in states where that is legally allowed. All of these roadblocks to the ballot can create a sense of distrust in the system, which could contribute to lower turnout, Jones said. The Brennan Center study also highlights on ongoing issue when it comes to understanding how or why Native Americans vote: a lack of good data. “There are immense data inequities when it comes to studying Native American communities, especially as it pertains to politics," Jones said. Native American communities are often overlooked when it comes to polling data and sometimes when they are included those studies do not reflect broader trends for Indigenous voters, said Stephanie Fryberg, the director of the Research for Indigenous Social Action & Equity Center, which studies systemic inequalities faced by Indigenous people. “Generally speaking, polling is not well positioned to do a good job for Indian Country,” said Fryberg, who is also a professor of psychology at Northwestern University. “There are ideas that are held up as the gold standard about how polling works that don’t work for Indian Country because of where we live, because of how difficult it is to connect to people in our community.” Fryberg, a member of the Tulalip Tribes in Washington state, was one of several Indigenous researchers who denounced a recent exit poll conducted by Edison Research that found 65% of Native American voters who participated said they voted for Donald Trump. The poll only surveyed 229 self-identified Native Americans, a sample size that she said is too small for an accurate reading, and none of the jurisdictions in the poll were on tribal lands. “Right there, you’re already eliminating a powerful perspective,” Fryberg said. The Indigenous Journalists Association labelled that polling data as “highly misleading and irresponsible,” saying it has led “to widespread misinformation.” In a statement to the Associated Press, Edison Research acknowledged that the polling size is small, but said the "goal of the survey is to represent the national electorate and to have enough data to also examine large demographic and geographic subgroups." The survey has a potential sampling margin of error of plus or minus 9%, according to the statement. “Based on all of these factors, this data point from our survey should not be taken as a definitive word on the American Indian vote,” the statement reads. Native Americans are not just part of an ethnic group, they also have political identities that come with being citizens of sovereign nations. Fryberg said allowing those surveyed to self-identify as Native Americans, without follow-up questions about tribal membership and specific Indigenous populations, means that data cannot accurately capture voting trends for those communities. Both Fryberg and Jones said that in order to create better data on and opportunities for Native Americans to vote, researchers and lawmakers would have to meet the specific needs of Indigenous communities. Jones said passage of the Native American Voting Rights Act, a bill that has stalled in Congress, would ensure equitable in-person voting options in every precinct on tribal lands. “This is not an issue that we see across the country,” Jones said. “It’s very specific to tribal lands. So we need provisions that address that uniquely.” This story has been updated to correct the name of the Tulalip Tribes. Graham Lee Brewer is an Oklahoma City-based member of the AP's Race and Ethnicity team.

An online debate over foreign workers in tech shows tensions in Trump's political coalitionOpenAI launches $200 ChatGPT subscription for research use

CHARLOTTE, N.C. — Detroit guard Cade Cunningham left Thursday night’s game in Charlotte in the final minute of regulation due to a left hip injury and did not play in overtime as the Pistons fell to the Hornets. Cunningham fell hard to the floor after getting fouled by Grant Williams with 48 seconds left in the game. He made both free throws to briefly give the Pistons the lead before leaving, and the Pistons lost 123-121. Pistons head coach J.B. Bickerstaff offered no update on Cunningham’s status after the game. Cunningham finished with 27 points and 10 assists for the Pistons, who lost their second straight game to a Hornets team that got a career-high 38 points from Brandon Miller and 35 from LaMelo Ball.Arsenal began life without Bukayo Saka by beating Ipswich 1-0 to move into second place in the Premier League and cut Liverpool's lead to six points on Friday. Kai Havertz scored the only goal as Arsenal failed to turn their dominance into a more convincing scoreline. The lack of a clinical goalscorer may ultimately cost Mikel Arteta's men a first league title in more than 20 years, but they took advantage of Chelsea's shock 2-1 defeat against Fulham on Thursday to become Liverpool's closest challenger. Saka is set to be sidelined for "many weeks" in the words of Gunners' boss Arteta with fears the England international could be out until March due to a hamstring injury suffered in last weekend's 5-1 victory at Crystal Palace. Arteta's solution was to start with Gabriel Martinelli in Saka's normal role wide right with Gabriel Jesus continuing up front after scoring five times in Arsenal's previous two outings. The home side were dominant in possession but had few clear-cut chances to show for it until the final quarter. Arsenal were frustrated by Everton in a 0-0 draw in their last league game at the Emirates so there was relief when Havertz broke the deadlock on 23 minutes. The German prodded high into the net from Leandro Trossard's low cross for his 12th goal of the season. Jesus did find the net once more with a cheeky finish between the legs of Arijanet Muric from an almost impossible angle, but was flagged offside. Arsenal's prowess from set-pieces has been well-documented and they should have added to their goals from corners this season. Gabriel Magalhaes headed against the outside of the post from point-blank range when it seemed easier to score. As Ipswich's ambition grew as the second half wore on, so the chances at the other end began to flow. Martin Odegaard had given the home crowd a scare by going down holding the left ankle that saw him sidelined by injury for two months earlier in the campaign. The Arsenal captain, though, was quickly back on his feet and weaving his way through the Ipswich defence with a mazy run and powerful strike that Muric tipped over. From the resulting corner, Declan Rice's powerful shot was blocked by Dara O'Shea. Havertz then wasted a glorious chance for his second and Muric saved once more from Mikel Merino to ensure a nervy ending. But Arsenal held out to leapfrog Nottingham Forest and Chelsea into second. Ipswich remain second from bottom, three points adrift of safety. Brighton missed the chance to move within one point of the top five as their poor run continued in a 0-0 draw at home to Brentford. The Seagulls are now winless in their past six games but they two remain two points above their opponents. Brentford had the ball in the net early on through Yoane Wissa but the goal was ruled out for offside after a VAR check. Just Brentford's second point away from home all season is enough to edge the Bees ahead of Tottenham into 11th.

Prospera Financial Services Inc lessened its stake in Palantir Technologies Inc. ( NYSE:PLTR – Free Report ) by 4.4% in the 3rd quarter, according to the company in its most recent 13F filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The fund owned 26,951 shares of the company’s stock after selling 1,252 shares during the quarter. Prospera Financial Services Inc’s holdings in Palantir Technologies were worth $1,003,000 as of its most recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). A number of other hedge funds also recently bought and sold shares of the company. Northwest Investment Counselors LLC bought a new stake in shares of Palantir Technologies in the 3rd quarter worth $25,000. Summit Securities Group LLC purchased a new position in Palantir Technologies in the 2nd quarter worth about $25,000. Farmers & Merchants Investments Inc. bought a new position in Palantir Technologies during the 2nd quarter valued at about $25,000. Creekmur Asset Management LLC grew its stake in shares of Palantir Technologies by 46.0% in the third quarter. Creekmur Asset Management LLC now owns 1,063 shares of the company’s stock worth $40,000 after acquiring an additional 335 shares during the period. Finally, Ritter Daniher Financial Advisory LLC DE grew its stake in shares of Palantir Technologies by 47.5% in the third quarter. Ritter Daniher Financial Advisory LLC DE now owns 1,180 shares of the company’s stock worth $44,000 after acquiring an additional 380 shares during the period. Institutional investors own 45.65% of the company’s stock. Insider Transactions at Palantir Technologies In other news, insider Heather A. Planishek sold 14,016 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction dated Thursday, August 29th. The stock was sold at an average price of $30.67, for a total value of $429,870.72. Following the completion of the transaction, the insider now owns 576,023 shares of the company’s stock, valued at $17,666,625.41. This represents a 2.38 % decrease in their ownership of the stock. The transaction was disclosed in a legal filing with the SEC, which is available at this hyperlink . Also, insider Alexander C. Karp sold 4,500,000 shares of the stock in a transaction that occurred on Monday, September 16th. The shares were sold at an average price of $36.07, for a total value of $162,315,000.00. Following the transaction, the insider now directly owns 6,432,258 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $232,011,546.06. The trade was a 41.16 % decrease in their ownership of the stock. The disclosure for this sale can be found here . Insiders sold a total of 34,167,451 shares of company stock valued at $1,603,067,889 over the last 90 days. Company insiders own 12.93% of the company’s stock. Wall Street Analyst Weigh In View Our Latest Report on Palantir Technologies Palantir Technologies Stock Up 4.8 % NYSE:PLTR opened at $64.33 on Friday. The business’s 50-day simple moving average is $45.94 and its two-hundred day simple moving average is $33.31. Palantir Technologies Inc. has a 52 week low of $15.66 and a 52 week high of $66.00. The stock has a market cap of $146.55 billion, a PE ratio of 321.65 and a beta of 2.70. Palantir Technologies ( NYSE:PLTR – Get Free Report ) last released its quarterly earnings data on Monday, November 4th. The company reported $0.10 earnings per share for the quarter, topping analysts’ consensus estimates of $0.09 by $0.01. The firm had revenue of $725.52 million during the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $705.11 million. Palantir Technologies had a return on equity of 9.94% and a net margin of 18.01%. The business’s quarterly revenue was up 30.0% compared to the same quarter last year. During the same quarter in the prior year, the company posted $0.03 earnings per share. Sell-side analysts anticipate that Palantir Technologies Inc. will post 0.21 earnings per share for the current fiscal year. About Palantir Technologies ( Free Report ) Palantir Technologies Inc builds and deploys software platforms for the intelligence community to assist in counterterrorism investigations and operations in the United States, the United Kingdom, and internationally. The company provides Palantir Gotham, a software platform which enables users to identify patterns hidden deep within datasets, ranging from signals intelligence sources to reports from confidential informants, as well as facilitates the handoff between analysts and operational users, helping operators plan and execute real-world responses to threats that have been identified within the platform. Featured Stories Want to see what other hedge funds are holding PLTR? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for Palantir Technologies Inc. ( NYSE:PLTR – Free Report ). Receive News & Ratings for Palantir Technologies Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Palantir Technologies and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .Rams finally ran the ball well in New Orleans, and it kept them in the playoff race(The Center Square) – Illinois’ pension debt compared to personal income is the second worst in the nation. Fitch Ratings reviewed pension funds for public employee retirees from every state. “In aggregate, states had $924 billion in Fitch-adjusted [net pension liabilities] as of state fiscal 2023 audits,” the report said. “This was up 21.2% from the $762 billion reported last year, as post-pandemic asset values surged, but it remained below the $1 trillion level reached in fiscal 2021.” The report found Illinois’ unfunded pension liability, when including other post employment benefits, is $206.5 billion. “The median ratio of direct debt to personal income measured only 1.8% in fiscal 2023, below the 2% level in fiscal 2022,” the report said. “Since fiscal 2016, when the median was 2.3% of personal income, the burden of state direct debt has been flat to declining.” The ratings agency’s recent report has the long-term liabilities for Illinois making up 22.8% of the state’s personal income, the second worst in the country behind Connecticut. Illinois was singled out several times in Fitch’s report as being among states that didn’t have the most recent comprehensive annual report and for having a magnitude of post employment benefits with high legal barriers for a state to modify benefits. State Sen. Robert Martwick, D-Chicago, is chairman of the Senate’s pension committee. He said it’s not surprising Illinois’ pension debt is among the worst in the country in Fitch’s report. Fixing it means addressing many issues, he said. Diminishing benefits isn’t in the cards. “The constitution in Illinois prohibits unilateral pension benefits and to be fair I agree with that,” Martwick told The Center Square. “I don’t think the way to save money is to punish people that did nothing wrong.” State Rep. Blaine Wilhour, R-Beecher City, is on the House committee dealing with pensions and said things have to change. And the first thing is to not make it worse. “There’s a huge push going on in Springfield right now,” Wilhour said. “The public sector special interests are rallying here to basically make Tier II into Tier I.” Legislators have been discussing enhancing benefits for employees hired after 2011. The push is to bring the Tier II benefits in line with Social Security equivalent retirement guidelines. Martwick said they have to fix it because the cost of making good along with any subsequent penalties after the fact would be more expensive for taxpayers. “It’s gonna happen and the cost is a moving target because of course there are different ideas on what that should look like,” Martwick said. Martwick said Gov. J.B. Pritzker has made his pitch. The Labor unions have made theirs. “I believe over the course of the next six to seven months, we will have a lot of hearings and negotiations and see if we can land that plane on something that satisfies both ends,” Martwick said. Wilhour said increasing benefits goes in the wrong direction of making progress in paying down the liability. “But as they generally do in Springfield, they make it worse because they’re more worried about buying votes than they are in protecting the citizens of this state,” Wilhour said. Fitch’s report has Connecticut’s $74.9 billion in debt at 23% of personal income as the worst. The best state was Tennessee with $4.4 billion at 1% of personal income.

Previous: jk4 online casino
Next: nn777 online casino