Heading into 2025 Americans are more hopeful than discouraged — and more outright hopeful than they were heading into 2024. Last year was more mixed. It does look like this very political past year is affecting that larger outlook going into next year. Among those who say they're generally hopeful about 2025, their top reason is that Donald Trump will be president. His upcoming presidency ranks even higher among things making them feel hopeful about 2025 than their outlook for their own personal relationships and finances. The hopeful group includes a lot of Republicans, underscoring the extent to which politics seems to play a role in outlook generally. And of those Americans who say they're generally discouraged about 2025 — a group that includes a lot of Democrats — their top reason is that Donald Trump will be president. That said, the new year may not see too many Americans making personal changes. Just over a third will be making New Year's resolutions, the bulk of which include — as we tend to see each year we ask — ideas around improving one's health and exercising more. For the vast majority of Americans, getting more involved in politics isn't one of them. And most will try to avoid political talk over the holidays. Economy For now, ratings of the national economy are about the same as last month, and about half of Americans say their own financial situation is good. To those who say things are bad, it's much the same story ending 2024 as it has been for years: inflation and prices are driving that sentiment. Those economic sentiments also weighed on President Biden's approval over much of his term, and his rating as he nears the end of that term remains in negative territory, about where it has hovered for a long time. There's been negative reaction to his decision to pardon his son Hunter Biden , and that tracks closely with partisanship. We've also long seen the pull of partisanship in economic evaluations, and here, people tell us about it directly. Among the (relatively few) Republicans who say the economy is good, a top answer they give for why this is the case is that Donald Trump is going to be president. For Republicans who say the economy is bad, a top answer they give about why is that Joe Biden is president. The economic lookahead on some economic aspects is net positive but also partisan. Slightly more Americans, driven by a big majority of Republicans, think Trump's policies will lower grocery prices than raise them. By two to one, more Americans think Trump's policies will lead to more U.S. technological advances than fewer. Support for tariffs, though, is sharply partisan, heavily favored by Republicans but not by most independents or Democrats. There's been a bit of an increase since November in the percentage who think tariffs would lead to higher prices. Americans also think Trump's policies are more likely to increase peace and stability in the world, more so than decrease it. Social media's reaction to killing of healthcare CEO After the killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson , the social media and online reaction to it has itself gotten attention. Most Americans say they have seen or heard something about the social media reactions that others have expressed online, and many have seen comments from others that appear to be positive reactions. Big majorities think it's unacceptable when there's seemingly positive reactions on social media, either about the killing or seemingly in support of the alleged killer. In explaining why those posts might be happening, though, most think it is driven by people who are angry about the health insurance system, not that those expressing such sentiments are condoning violence. This CBS News/YouGov survey was conducted with a nationally representative sample of 2,244 U.S. adults interviewed between December 18-20, 2024. The sample was weighted to be representative of adults nationwide according to gender, age, race, and education, based on the U.S. Census American Community Survey and Current Population Survey, as well as 2024 presidential vote. The margin of error is ±2.4 points. Opinion Poll Donald Trump Anthony Salvanto, Ph.D., is CBS News' executive director of elections and surveys. He oversees the CBS News Poll and all surveys across topics and heads the CBS News Decision Desk that estimates outcomes on election nights
Three-quarters of police forces are failing to hit 999 call response time targets - so how does YOUR area fare?NEW DELHI: Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Emir of Kuwait Sheikh Meshal Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah on Sunday agreed to elevate India-Kuwait relations and discussed cooperation in key sectors like pharmaceuticals, IT, FinTech, infrastructure, and security. PM Modi, on the second day of his two-day visit to Kuwait, was welcomed with a ceremonial Guard of Honour at the Bayan Palace. He held discussions with the Emir, Prime Minister Ahmad Al-Abdullah Al-Ahmad Al-Sabah, and Crown Prince Sabah Al-Khaled Al-Hamad Al-Mubarak Al-Sabah on further enhancing bilateral ties. During the meetings, both leaders focussed on the importance of strengthening cooperation across various sectors including trade, investment, defence, security, technology, health, education, and people-to-people exchanges. A key outcome of the visit was the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on defence cooperation, which aims to facilitate joint exercises, the supply of defence equipment, and research and development collaboration. Additional MoUs were also signed to promote cooperation in sports, culture, and solar energy. PM Modi congratulated the Emir for successfully hosting the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Summit earlier this month. He also thanked the Kuwaiti leadership for their efforts in ensuring the well-being of over one million Indians residing in Kuwait. In a post on X, PM Modi described his meeting with the Emir as "excellent" and reaffirmed the close ties between the two nations, expressing optimism that the elevated strategic partnership would lead to further flourishing relations. " Excellent meeting with His Highness the Amir of Kuwait, Sheikh Meshal Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al Sabah. We discussed cooperation in key sectors like pharmaceuticals, IT, FinTech, Infrastructure and security. In line with the close ties between our nations, we have elevated our partnership to a strategic one and I am optimistic that our friendship will flourish even more in the times to come." PM Modi said in a post on X. The visit, which also saw PM Modi being awarded the prestigious Mubarak Al-Kabeer Medal by the Emir, is the first by an Indian Prime Minister to Kuwait in 43 years. PM Modi also extended an invitation to the Emir to visit India, further cementing the growing partnership between the two countries. Kuwait is one of India's top trading partners, with bilateral trade reaching USD 10.47 billion in the financial year 2023-24, and India being the largest supplier of crude to the Gulf nation. Stay updated with the latest news on Times of India . Don't miss daily games like Crossword , Sudoku , and Mini Crossword .I am driving my tween to school, and we are listening to his music. “Yeah, you try to come wrong ’bout this shit, we poppin’ ya tires, hol’ up... fein’- fein’-fein’-fein ...” I am trying so hard not to sound like a Boomer right now. (I was born in 1971, so I’m classic Gen X, but you get my drift.) I hold my tongue. But I cannot help but compare this to what I was listening to at his age. What was I listening to? Music that protested against poverty and injustice. Music that demanded change, demanded that we part with our cash because people were starving in Africa. Forty years ago today: The assembled artists of Band Aid who collaborated on Do They Know It’s Christmas? Today, November 25, marks the 40th anniversary of the moment that the biggest names in British and Irish pop music joined forces as Band Aid to record Do They Know It’s Christmas? The song went straight to No.1 in 14 countries, raising millions in aid in the first year of sales. I recently reflected on the impact of this historic event on my 13-year-old self when I had the very great fortune to be part of a small audience with Band Aid’s instigator, Bob Geldof. Seated comfortably in a venue overlooking the Harbour Bridge, I listened as the world-renowned activist and rocking global changemaker told us how he had rallied the stars of the music industry to raise awareness and funds for victims of an Ethiopian famine that had occurred between 1983 and 1985. I sat on the edge of my seat, fangirling with tears in my eyes as he told us how the pop stars I loved as a teenager eagerly gave up their time for the cause; how his young mate, Bono, needed some persuasion as he didn’t feel like he was a star of the calibre of Elton John and Duran Duran. He told us how Wham’s now iconic Last Christmas single was due for release on the same day as Band Aid’s charity single, so George Michael not only agreed to delay the release, but also donated all the proceeds from his song to the Band Aid cause. The day the song was released – December 7, 1984 – I took my paper-run money to Brashs record store and bought my first seven-inch vinyl single. At home, it spun on repeat on the turntable. It was a formative moment for me. All my idols were involved in this project. All the artists and musicians I admired joined in an act of selflessness that was the outward display of their social conscience. Idols, role models, are important to young people. Their behaviour shapes the thinking of a young mind and helps construct a worldview. Loading At the risk of sounding like the Boomer I am not, I sometimes wonder whether Gen Z misses out here. I wonder why the same social conscience is no longer evident in popular music. Perhaps it’s because those British and Irish pop icons who sang for Africa – now described as Boomers – were only one generation away from those who witnessed the horror of World War II. The despair and disgrace of the Vietnam War was in their living memory. At the same time, the Cold War gave us all fear of annihilation. Globalisation and mass media gave us knowledge of the deprivation of the Third World while the West enjoyed wealthy lives. So of course, Sting was singing about disarmament of the two superpowers and U2 about violence, conflict and Ireland’s Troubles. And Midnight Oil sang about politics, consumerism, Indigenous disadvantage and the threat of nuclear war. I listened to music made by these bands and artists, and they knew how to “feed the world”, to shake things up. Pretty sure when Taylor Swift suggests you Shake It Off , she’s not inviting you to disrupt. And Sabrina Carpenter isn’t demanding an end to child labour in coffee production in Espresso . I’m not claiming that the desire for social upheaval isn’t expressed in indie rock, pop and rap. It’s just that the mainstream music doesn’t fly that flag any more. Relationships, sexuality and the industry itself provide plenty of material, but songs about overthrowing the system do not get many plays on the streaming services. So, my Gen Z child’s playlist is on rotation as we drive, and Kendrick Lamar is dissing Drake again: “I hate the way that you walk, the way that you talk, I hate the way that you dress.” Ouch. I can’t see those two making a charity record together any time soon. I guess if Gen Z are looking for warriors of social justice to model themselves on, they will have to look elsewhere. Maree Badgery-Parker is a writer and a schoolteacher. Save Log in , register or subscribe to save articles for later. License this article Gen Z Opinion Charity Gen X For subscribers Maree Badgery-Parker – High school teacher in Sydney Most Viewed in Culture Loading
Desktop as a Service (DaaS) Provider Market 2024 Set for Major Growth Surge Over the Next Decade 12-25-2024 07:40 PM CET | Business, Economy, Finances, Banking & Insurance Press release from: Prudent Markets Desktop as a Service (DaaS) Provider Market The Desktop as a Service (DaaS) Provider Market 2024-2023 report provides a comprehensive analysis of Types (Hardware, Soulutions & Services), Application (BSFI, Government, Healthcare, Education, Other), Analysis of Industry Trends, Growth, and Opportunities, R&D landscape, Data security and privacy concerns Risk Analysis, Pipeline Products, Assumptions, Research Timelines, Secondary Research and Primary Research, Key Insights from Industry Experts, Regional Outlook and Forecast, 2024-2032. Major Players of Desktop as a Service (DaaS) Provider Market are: Citrix, V2 Cloud, Workspot, AWS, Microsoft, Evolve IP, Shells.com, Kasm Technologies, VMware, Nutanix, TekReach Solutions, Cameyo, Dizzion, ComputerSupport, Anunta Technology, DSP-Explorer, Blackberry, Anunta Tech, CloudOffice, UKFast, Hosted Desktop, HiveIO, Ace Cloud Hosting, integratedPRIVATE, Saca Technologies, itopia, LISTEQ, Navisite, GVB Geomatics Private, oneclick AG Get PDF Sample Report Now! @ https://www.prudentmarkets.com/sample-request/9169174/ Desktop as a service (DaaS) solutions provide a virtualized desktop experience to users, entirely from the cloud. Unlike virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI) software, which utilize on-premises hosting for desktop virtualization, DaaS solutions center around cloud hosting the desktop admin console and virtual desktops. DaaS eliminates the need for businesses to purchase the physical infrastructure associated with desktop virtualization, instead functioning through subscription- and usage-based payment structures. This report provides a deep insight into the global Desktop as a Service (DaaS) Provider market covering all its essential aspects. This ranges from a macro overview of the market to micro details of the market size, competitive landscape, development trend, niche market, key market drivers and challenges, SWOT analysis, value chain analysis, etc. The analysis helps the reader to shape the competition within the industries and strategies for the competitive environment to enhance the potential profit. Furthermore, it provides a simple framework for evaluating and accessing the position of the business organization. The report structure also focuses on the competitive landscape of the Global Desktop as a Service (DaaS) Provider Market, this report introduces in detail the market share, market performance, product situation, operation situation, etc. of the main players, which helps the readers in the industry to identify the main competitors and deeply understand the competition pattern of the market. Segmentation of Desktop as a Service (DaaS) Provider Market- By Type Hardware, Soulutions & Services By Application BSFI, Government, Healthcare, Education, Other Geographic Segmentation -North America (USA, Canada, Mexico) -Europe (Germany, UK, France, Russia, Italy, Rest of Europe) -Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, South Korea, India, Southeast Asia, Rest of Asia-Pacific) -South America (Brazil, Argentina, Columbia, Rest of South America) -The Middle East and Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Nigeria, South Africa, Rest of MEA) Prudent Markets provides attractive discounts that fit your needs. Customization of the reports as per your requirement is also offered. Get in touch with our sales team, who will guarantee you a report that suits your needs. Speak To Our Analyst For A Discussion On The Above Findings, And Ask For A Discount On The Report @ https://www.prudentmarkets.com/discount-request/9169174/ Key Benefits of the Report: This study presents the analytical depiction of the Desktop as a Service (DaaS) Provider Industry along with the current trends and future estimations to determine the imminent investment pockets. The report presents information related to key drivers, restraints, and opportunities along with detailed analysis of the Desktop as a Service (DaaS) Provider Market share. The current market is quantitatively analyzed from to highlight the Global Gardening Pots Market growth scenario. Porter's five forces analysis illustrates the potency of buyers & suppliers in the market. The report provides a detailed Desktop as a Service (DaaS) Provider Market analysis based on competitive intensity and how the competition will take shape in coming years. Key poles of the TOC: Chapter 1 Desktop as a Service (DaaS) Provider Market Business Overview Chapter 2 Major Breakdown by Type Chapter 3 Major Application Wise Breakdown (Revenue & Volume) Chapter 4 Manufacture Market Breakdown Chapter 5 Sales & Estimates Market Study Chapter 6 Key Manufacturers Production and Sales Market Comparison Breakdown Chapter 8 Manufacturers, Deals and Closings Market Evaluation & Aggressiveness Chapter 9 Key Companies Breakdown by Overall Market Size & Revenue by Type Chapter 11 Business / Industry Chain (Value & Supply Chain Analysis) Chapter 12 Conclusions & Appendix The report covers the competitive analysis of the market. As the demand is driven by a buyer's paying capacity and the rate of item development, the report shows the important regions that will direct growth. This section exclusively shares insight into the budget reports of big-league members of the market helping key players and new entrants understand the potential of investments in the Global Desktop as a Service (DaaS) Provider Market. It can be better employed by both traditional and new players in the industry for complete know-how of the market. For In-Depth Competitive Analysis - Purchase this Report now at a Complete Table of Contents (Single User License) @ https://www.prudentmarkets.com/checkout/?id=9169174&license_type=su Free Customization on the basis of client requirements on Immediate purchase: 1- Free country-level breakdown of any 5 countries of your interest. 2- Competitive breakdown of segment revenue by market players. Customization of the Report: This report can be customized to meet the client's requirements. Please connect with our sales team (sales@prudentmarkets.com), who will ensure that you get a report that suits your needs. You can also get in touch with our executives on +91 83560 50278 || USA/Canada(Toll Free): 1800-601-6071 to share your research requirements. In conclusion, the Desktop as a Service (DaaS) Provider Market report is a genuine source for accessing the research data which is projected to exponentially grow your business. The report provides information such as economic scenarios, benefits, limits, trends, market growth rates, and figures. SWOT analysis and PESTLE analysis is also incorporated in the report. Contact Us: Allan Carter Andheri, Maharashtra, 400102 USA/Canada(Toll Free): 1800-601-6071 Direct Line: +91 83560 50278 Mail: sales@prudentmarkets.com Web: www.prudentmarkets.com About Us: We are leaders in market analytics, business research, and consulting services for Fortune 500 companies, start-ups, financial & government institutions. Since we understand the criticality of data and insights, we have associated with the top publishers and research firms all specialized in specific domains, ensuring you will receive the most reliable and up to date research data available. To be at our client's disposal whenever they need help on market research and consulting services. We also aim to be their business partners when it comes to making critical business decisions around new market entry, M&A, competitive Intelligence and strategy. This release was published on openPR.DETROIT — Fifty years later, a man who grew up in suburban Detroit tried to return a very overdue baseball book to his boyhood library. The answer: You can keep it — and no fine. Chuck Hildebrandt, 63, of Chicago said he visited the public library in Warren while in town for Thanksgiving, carrying a book titled "Baseball's Zaniest Stars." He borrowed it in 1974 as a 13-year-old "baseball nut" but never returned it. Chuck Hildebrandt of Chicago holds the book "Baseball's Zaniest Stars," which was due Dec. 4, 1974, at the Warren, Mich., library, on Dec. 10. Terrie Wendricks "When you're moving with a bunch of books, you're not examining every book. You throw them in a box and go," said Hildebrandt, who lived in many cities. "But five or six years ago, I was going through the bookshelf and there was a Dewey decimal library number on the book. 'What is this?'" Inside the book was a slip of paper indicating it was due back at the Warren library on Dec. 4, 1974. People are also reading... Hildebrandt told The Associated Press he decided to keep the book until 2024 — the 50th anniversary — and then try to return it. He figured the library might want to publicize the long overdue exchange. Chuck Hildebrandt of Chicago shows the library slip in the overdue book "Baseball's Zaniest Stars" on Dec. 10. Terrie Wendricks He said he recently met library director Oksana Urban, who listened to his pitch. Hildebrandt said he hasn't heard anything since then, though Urban told the Detroit Free Press that all is forgiven. "Some people never come back to face the music," she said of patrons with overdue books. "But there was really no music to face because he and the book were erased from our system." So "Baseball's Zaniest Stars" is back on Hildebrandt's shelf. In return, he's now trying to raise $4,564 for Reading is Fundamental, a nonprofit literacy group. The amount roughly represents a 50-year overdue library fine. Hildebrandt seeded the effort with $457. The right book can inspire the young readers in your life, from picture books to YA novels Taylor Swift 'Eras' tie-in book is a smash, selling more than 800,000 copies in first weekend Charles Dickens' characters come alive in a Dutch town enamored with the English author Best draft picks of all-time for every MLB team Best draft picks of all-time for every MLB team The Major League Baseball draft is unique among professional sports drafts. The 30 organizations pick teenagers and college students who will not join their big league clubs for years—if ever.These athletes will spend that time honing their craft in the minor leagues, where long bus rides and minuscule paychecks are the norm. A few will move quickly up the ranks, seizing playing time opportunities to advance their careers and making their names known to scouts, fans, and other observers around the country.Some of the best will become MLB stars, but there's minimal correlation to draft position. Four of the players on this list were picked after hundreds of other diamond darlings, and only two were #1 overall selections.There's also more than a handful who didn't do much for the teams that drafted them, including superstars such as Nolan Ryan, Ozzie Smith, and Randy Johnson. Each of these players was traded before they evolved into Hall of Famers.Still, calling the draft a "crapshoot" might be going too far. College players are "slightly more likely" than high schoolers to reach the revered stadiums of the majors, and third-rounders have a better chance than fifth-rounders, for example, though the margins are slim, as Vice reported. Teams not only make picks based on years-in-advance projections but also whether they can sign players, a step that must be completed before those youngsters begin playing professionally.To see how clubs have fared since the inaugural draft in 1965, ATS.io compiled a list of the best draft pick by each franchise using data from Baseball Reference. The players were ranked using career wins above replacement, so not one recent choice was named. The amazing Mike Trout, a 32-year-old selected in 2009, is the youngest player. Unsigned picks were not considered, and players who were traded as picks were credited to their acquiring teams. Data is as of June 5, 2024. Mike Stobe // Getty Images Arizona Diamondbacks: Max Scherzer - Draft: 11th overall pick in 2006- Position: Pitcher- Games played: 457- Career stats: 214 wins, 3.15 earned run average, 1.08 walks plus hits per inning- College/HS: University of Missouri (Columbia, Mo.)- Wins above replacement: 75.0 Harry How // Getty Images Atlanta Braves: Chipper Jones - Draft: 1st overall pick in 1990- Position: Shortstop- Games played: 2,499- Career stats: 468 home runs, .303 batting average, .930 on-base plus slugging- College/HS: The Bolles School (Jacksonville, Fla.)- Wins above replacement: 85.3 Kevin C. Cox // Getty Images Baltimore Orioles: Cal Ripken Jr. - Draft: 48th overall pick in 1978- Position: Third baseman- Games played: 3,001- Career stats: 431 home runs, .276 batting average, .788 on-base plus slugging- College/HS: Aberdeen HS (Aberdeen, Md.)- Wins above replacement: 95.9 Focus on Sport // Getty Images Boston Red Sox: Roger Clemens - Draft: 19th overall pick in 1983- Position: Pitcher- Games played: 709- Career stats: 354 wins, 3.12 earned run average, 1.17 walks plus hits per inning- College/HS: University of Texas at Austin (Austin, Texas)- Wins above replacement: 139.2 Rick Stewart // Getty Images Chicago Cubs: Greg Maddux - Draft: 31st overall pick in 1984- Position: Pitcher- Games played: 744- Career stats: 355 wins, 3.16 earned run average, 1.14 walks plus hits per inning- College/HS: Valley HS (Las Vegas, Nev.)- Wins above replacement: 106.6 Ron Vesely/MLB Photos // Getty Images Chicago White Sox: Frank Thomas - Draft: 7th overall pick in 1989- Position: First baseman- Games played: 2,322- Career stats: 521 home runs, .301 batting average, .974 on-base plus slugging- College/HS: Auburn University (Auburn, Ala.)- Wins above replacement: 73.8 David Seelig // Getty Images Cincinnati Reds: Johnny Bench - Draft: 36th overall pick in 1965- Position: Catcher- Games played: 2,158- Career stats: 389 home runs, .267 batting average, .817 on-base plus slugging- College/HS: Binger HS (Binger, Okla.)- Wins above replacement: 75.1 James Drake // Getty Images Cleveland Guardians: Jim Thome - Draft: 333rd overall pick in 1989- Position: Shortstop- Games played: 2,543- Career stats: 612 home runs, .276 batting average, .956 on-base plus slugging- College/HS: Illinois Central College (East Peoria, Ill.)- Wins above replacement: 73.1 Ronald Martinez // Getty Images Colorado Rockies: Todd Helton - Draft: 8th overall pick in 1995- Position: First baseman- Games played: 2,247- Career stats: 369 home runs, .316 batting average, .953 on-base plus slugging- College/HS: University of Tennessee (Knoxville, Tenn.)- Wins above replacement: 61.8 Dustin Bradford // Getty Images Detroit Tigers: Justin Verlander - Draft: 2nd overall pick in 2004- Position: Pitcher- Games played: 518- Career stats: 260 wins, 3.25 earned run average, 1.12 walks plus hits per inning- College/HS: Old Dominion University (Norfolk, Va.)- Wins above replacement: 81.7 Rob Carr // Getty Images Houston Astros: Kenny Lofton - Draft: 428th overall pick in 1988- Position: Outfielder- Games played: 2,103- Career stats: 130 home runs, .299 batting average, .794 on-base plus slugging- College/HS: University of Arizona (Tucson, Ariz.)- Wins above replacement: 68.4 Sporting News // Getty Images Kansas City Royals: George Brett - Draft: 29th overall pick in 1971- Position: Shortstop- Games played: 2,707- Career stats: 317 home runs, .305 batting average, .857 on-base plus slugging- College/HS: El Segundo HS (El Segundo, Calif.)- Wins above replacement: 88.6 Focus on Sport // Getty Images Los Angeles Angels: Mike Trout - Draft: 25th overall pick in 2009- Position: Centerfielder- Games played: 1,518- Career stats: 378 home runs, .299 batting average, .991 on-base plus slugging- College/HS: Millville Senior HS (Millville, N.J.)- Wins above replacement: 86.1 Dustin Bradford // Getty Images Los Angeles Dodgers: Clayton Kershaw - Draft: 7th overall pick in 2006- Position: Pitcher- Games played: 425- Career stats: 210 wins, 2.48 earned run average, 1.00 walks plus hits per inning- College/HS: Highland Park HS (Dallas, Texas)- Wins above replacement: 79.7 Allen J. Schaben // Getty Images Miami Marlins: Giancarlo Stanton - Draft: 76th overall pick in 2007- Position: First baseman- Games played: 1,589- Career stats: 417 home runs, .258 batting average, .874 on-base plus slugging- College/HS: Notre Dame HS (Sherman Oaks, Calif.)- Wins above replacement: 44.3 Rob Foldy // Getty Images Milwaukee Brewers: Robin Yount - Draft: 3rd overall pick in 1973- Position: Shortstop- Games played: 2,856- Career stats: 251 home runs, .285 batting average, .772 on-base plus slugging- College/HS: William Howard Taft Charter HS (Woodland Hills, Calif.)- Wins above replacement: 77.4 Rich Pilling // Getty Images Minnesota Twins: Bert Blyleven - Draft: 55th overall pick in 1969- Position: Pitcher- Games played: 692- Career stats: 287 wins, 3.31 earned run average, 1.20 walks plus hits per inning- College/HS: Santiago HS (Garden Grove, Calif.)- Wins above replacement: 94.5 Owen C. Shaw // Getty Images New York Mets: Nolan Ryan - Draft: 295th overall pick in 1965- Position: Pitcher- Games played: 807- Career stats: 324 wins, 3.19 earned run average, 1.25 walks plus hits per inning- College/HS: Alvin HS (Alvin, Texas)- Wins above replacement: 81.3 Focus on Sport // Getty Images New York Yankees: Derek Jeter - Draft: 6th overall pick in 1992- Position: Shortstop- Games played: 2,747- Career stats: 260 home runs, .310 batting average, .817 on-base plus slugging- College/HS: Central HS (Kalamazoo, Mich.)- Wins above replacement: 71.3 Tom Szczerbowski // Getty Images Philadelphia Phillies: Mike Schmidt - Draft: 30th overall pick in 1971- Position: Shortstop- Games played: 2,404- Career stats: 548 home runs, .268 batting average, .908 on-base plus slugging- College/HS: Ohio University (Athens, Ohio)- Wins above replacement: 106.9 Jonathan Daniel // Getty Images Pittsburgh Pirates: Barry Bonds - Draft: 6th overall pick in 1985- Position: Outfielder- Games played: 2,986- Career stats: 762 home runs, .298 batting average, 1.051 on-base plus slugging- College/HS: Arizona State University (Tempe, Ariz.)- Wins above replacement: 162.8 George Gojkovich // Getty Images San Diego Padres: Ozzie Smith - Draft: 86th overall pick in 1977- Position: Shortstop- Games played: 2,573- Career stats: 28 home runs, .262 batting average, .666 on-base plus slugging- College/HS: California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo (San Luis Obispo, Calif.)- Wins above replacement: 76.9 Focus on Sport // Getty Images San Francisco Giants: Will Clark - Draft: 2nd overall pick in 1985- Position: First baseman- Games played: 1,976- Career stats: 284 home runs, .303 batting average, .880 on-base plus slugging- College/HS: Mississippi State University (Mississippi State, Miss.)- Wins above replacement: 56.5 David Madison // Getty Images Seattle Mariners: Alex Rodriguez - Draft: 1st overall pick in 1993- Position: Shortstop- Games played: 2,784- Career stats: 696 home runs, .295 batting average, .930 on-base plus slugging- College/HS: Westminster Christian School (Miami, Fla.)- Wins above replacement: 117.6 John Reid III // Getty Images St. Louis Cardinals: Albert Pujols - Draft: 402nd overall pick in 1999- Position: Third baseman- Games played: 3,080- Career stats: 703 home runs, .296 batting average, .918 on-base plus slugging- College/HS: Metropolitan Community College-Maple Woods (Kansas City, Mo.)- Wins above replacement: 101.4 Harry How // Getty Images Tampa Bay Rays: Evan Longoria - Draft: 3rd overall pick in 2006- Position: Third baseman- Games played: 1,986- Career stats: 342 home runs, .264 batting average, .804 on-base plus slugging- College/HS: California State University, Long Beach (Long Beach, Calif.)- Wins above replacement: 58.6 J. Meric // Getty Images Toronto Blue Jays: Roy Halladay - Draft: 17th overall pick in 1995- Position: Pitcher- Games played: 416- Career stats: 203 wins, 3.38 earned run average, 1.18 walks plus hits per inning- College/HS: Arvada West HS (Arvada, Colo.)- Wins above replacement: 64.2 G Fiume // Getty Images Washington Nationals: Randy Johnson - Draft: 36th overall pick in 1985- Position: Pitcher- Games played: 618- Career stats: 303 wins, 3.29 earned run average, 1.17 walks plus hits per inning- College/HS: University of Southern California (Los Angeles, Calif.)- Wins above replacement: 101.1Data reporting by Karim Noorani. Story editing by Carren Jao. Additional editing by Kelly Glass. Copy editing by Robert Wickwire. Photo selection by Clarese Moller.This story originally appeared on ATS.io and was produced and distributed in partnership with Stacker Studio. Focus on Sport // Getty Images Oakland Athletics: Rickey Henderson - Draft: 96th overall pick in 1976- Position: Outfielder- Games played: 3,081- Career stats: 297 home runs, .279 batting average, .820 on-base plus slugging- College/HS: Oakland Technical HS (Oakland, Calif.)- Wins above replacement: 111.1 Bettmann // Getty Images Texas Rangers: Kevin Brown - Draft: 4th overall pick in 1986- Position: Pitcher- Games played: 486- Career stats: 211 wins, 3.28 earned run average, 1.22 walks plus hits per inning- College/HS: Georgia Institute of Technology (Atlanta, Ga.)- Wins above replacement: 67.8 Bernstein Associates // Getty Images Stay up-to-date on what's happeningApple discontinues iPhone SE, iPhone 14, iPhone 14 Plus in MANY countries | Is India on the list?
Apple has just released iOS 18.2.1 for iPhones, a minor update that focuses on squashing bugs and improving overall performance. This comes while the tech giant is simultaneously pushing forward with the development of iOS 18.3, which is currently undergoing beta testing and promises a slew of new features and enhancements. This rapid release cycle highlights Apple’s commitment to refining the user experience and addressing issues promptly. For users, this means a more stable and reliable operating system, even as exciting new developments are on the horizon. But what exactly does iOS 18.2.1 bring to the table, and what can we expect from iOS 18.3? Let’s dive in. iOS 18.2.1: Squishing Bugs and Boosting Performance While iOS 18.2 brought significant additions like Apple Music Sing, Advanced Data Protection for iCloud, and the Freeform app, iOS 18.2.1 takes a step back from flashy new features to concentrate on the core functionality of the operating system. This update primarily addresses bugs reported by users and improves the overall performance and stability of iPhones. Though Apple hasn’t released detailed patch notes, users across online forums and social media platforms like Reddit and Quora have reported improvements in: Personally, I noticed that my iPhone 13 Pro feels snappier after the update. I had been experiencing occasional lag when switching between apps, which seems to have disappeared with iOS 18.2.1. While it’s not a groundbreaking update, it definitely contributes to a smoother user experience. iOS 18.3 Beta: A Glimpse into the Future While iOS 18.2.1 focuses on refinement, iOS 18.3 is where the real excitement lies. Currently in beta testing, iOS 18.3 is expected to bring a range of new features and improvements, including: It’s important to remember that these features are based on information gathered from beta versions and may change before the final release. However, they provide a tantalizing glimpse into the future of iOS. Should You Update to iOS 18.2.1? The short answer is yes. Minor point updates like iOS 18.2.1 are generally focused on bug fixes and performance improvements , making them safe and recommended updates for most users. Unless you’re actively participating in the iOS 18.3 beta program and rely on specific features being tested, there’s little reason to hold back from updating to 18.2.1. Before updating, it’s always a good idea to: To update your iPhone to iOS 18.2.1, go to Settings > General > Software Update and follow the on-screen instructions. The iOS Update Cycle: A Balancing Act Apple’s approach to iOS updates involves a delicate balancing act between stability and innovation. Minor point updates like 18.2.1 focus on addressing immediate concerns and ensuring a smooth user experience. Meanwhile, major updates and beta releases push the boundaries of what’s possible with new features and enhancements. This dual-pronged approach allows Apple to cater to a wide range of users, from those who prioritize stability and reliability to those who are eager to try out the latest and greatest features. By staying informed about the different types of updates and their implications, users can make informed decisions about when and how to update their devices. Looking Ahead: What’s Next for iOS? While iOS 18.3 is still under development, rumors are already swirling about what Apple has in store for iOS 19. Expected to be announced at WWDC 2025, iOS 19 is rumored to bring major changes to the operating system, including: These are just a few of the potential features that could be coming to iOS 19. As always, Apple is keeping its cards close to its chest, so we’ll have to wait for the official announcement to get the full picture. The release of iOS 18.2.1 and the ongoing beta testing of iOS 18.3 demonstrate Apple’s commitment to providing a constantly evolving and improving operating system for its users. By addressing bugs, enhancing performance, and introducing new features, Apple ensures that iPhones remain at the forefront of mobile technology. As we look ahead to the future of iOS, it’s clear that Apple is not resting on its laurels. With rumors of major changes coming in iOS 19 and beyond, the future of the iPhone looks bright. Whether you’re a casual user or a tech enthusiast, there’s no denying that the iOS ecosystem continues to be a driving force in the world of mobile innovation.BJP govt in Bihar on its own will be true tribute to Vajpayee: Deputy CM Vijay Kumar Sinha
RJ Godfrey and Tyrin Lawrence each scored 14 points to help lead Georgia to a 79-72 win over visiting South Carolina State on Sunday in Athens, Ga. Asa Newell and Dakota Leffew added 12 apiece for Georgia (12-1) which rallied from a 17-point halftime deficit. Silas Demary Jr. had 11 points followed by De'Shayne Montgomery's 10, as the Bulldogs won their seventh straight game, marking their best start to a season since 1930-31 (13-0). Reserve Jayden Johnson led South Carolina State (6-9) with 16 points, followed by Michael Teal's 13 and Wilson Dubinsky's 12. South Carolina State dropped its third game in four tries entering Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference play on Jan. 4. Trailing 41-24 at halftime, Demary's triple and Montgomery's dunk began a 12-5 scoring run to open the second half, pulling Georgia within 10 at the 16:18 mark. After Teal's layup extended South Carolina State's lead to 50-39, Demary's basket stamped a 7-0 Georgia run, pulling the Bulldogs within four at the 11:17 mark of the second half. Dubinsky answered with a triple on the other end, but Leffew and Demary's layups began a 14-2 Georgia run -- which was capped with Lawrence's personal 8-0 spurt. Trailing 60-55, South Carolina State cut its deficit to one after Drayton Jones' four straight points. From there, Newell's three-point play jump started an 8-0 Georgia run, stamped with Montgomery's free throw with 3:42 left. After Davion Everett split a pair of free throws to pull South Carolina State within four with 1:44 left, Georgia made seven of its eight free-throw attempts to ice the victory. Georgia connected on just one field goal early in the game until Dylan James' layup trimmed its deficit to 7-5 at the 14:44 mark. After Johnson's basket put South Carolina State ahead 13-10, Leffew's 3-pointer followed by Montgomery's free throw gave Georgia its first lead with 10:27 left in the opening half. Godfrey's pair of free throws flipped the lead to Georgia with 5:30 remaining, before Dubinsky's triple gave South Carolina State a 24-22 advantage on the ensuing possession. Georgia was held scoreless until Somto Cyril's free throws snapped a 14-0 South Carolina State run with 50 seconds left. Johnson then capped the first half with consecutive 3-pointers, giving South Carolina State a 41-24 halftime lead. --Field Level MediaMcLaren and Honda went the V10 route when F1 returned to natural aspiration. The resulting MP4/5 and MP4/5B were championship-winning titans By the mid-1980s the power outputs of turbocharged F1 cars had gone berserk. From being little more than a curiosity barely five years previously, now you had to have one of the little 1.5-litre turbocharged engines if you hoped to win a race, and indeed by 1986 the turbo route was the only one allowed by the rules. Up to 1000bhp was often available in race trim, with as much as 1500bhp during qualifying – but only for one lap or so, before the engine was little more than a coffee table. The sport’s governing body decided to act, and announced that naturally aspirated engines would be making a comeback alongside the turbo engines for 1987, with turbos banned completely from 1989. They would be of 3.5-litre capacity, unlike the 3-litre limit hitherto in place for NA engines since 1966’s ‘return to power’. During ’87 the turbo cars had to run with a new 4 bar boost limit, but for 1988 the picture changed again, as boost was reduced to a maximum of 2.5 bar and fuel allowance cut to just 150 litres for a race. Now the 3.5-litre cars were more competitive, with teams so-equipped, such as Williams and Leyton House March, running in the top six. Out of the turbo runners, only Honda really took this final year of engine development seriously, given that turbos would be banned altogether for the 1989 season, and subsequently reaped the rewards by winning 15 out of 16 races with its 650bhp unit in the back of the McLaren MP4/4. For 1989 the pitlane resonated once again with the ear-splitting shriek of high-revving, large-capacity V8s, V10s and V12s. Nevertheless, McLaren was still the class of the field, the title being fought out between its drivers Ayrton Senna and Alain Prost, the contest coming to a head with a collision at Suzuka and the crown going to the Frenchman. That McLaren was the MP4/5, and as the 1990 season dawned, the team unveiled an updated version, known as the MP4/5B – the car you see here. It would go on to take the drivers’ title in the hands of Ayrton Senna, and in the most controversial of circumstances. The 3.5-litre era saw incredible development. Having started out with relatively straightforward cars that owed a lot to the turbo era but with a big, NA engines fitted, by 1993 they were among the most sophisticated the sport has ever seen, with their active suspensions, semi-automatic gearboxes, traction control and so on. Then for the final year most of those gizmos were removed, leaving these brutal cars a real handful. Whether that contributed to the tragedies of that season is a moot point, but soon aero and power would be reduced, and safety greatly increased. For 1995 a 3-litre displacement cap was introduced. Chassis MP4/5B-03 The MP4/5B was the work of Neil Oatley and a crack design team at McLaren, with Honda engine development headed up by Osamu Goto in Japan. Oatley had joined McLaren at the end of 1986, and in fact still works at McLaren as director of design and development. Steve Nichols had designed the MP4/4, with the plan being that he and Oatley would take it in turn to design successive McLarens after that (except Nichols then left with Prost for Ferrari ). ‘It’s one of my favourite cars,’ says Oatley with affection, ‘and I’ve still got the wind tunnel model of it in my house.’ MP4/5B chassis 03 has led an eventful life. Its initial role was as a ‘T’ car (back in the era when F1 teams took a spare car to races) for Ayrton Senna until the Monaco Grand Prix, where having been driven by Senna in practice, it was suddenly called into action when Senna’s teammate Gerhard Berger attempted an outrageously optimistic move on Alain Prost’s Ferrari, causing an inevitable shunt and blocking the track. With the race stopped, Berger ran back to the pits and jumped into 03. Despite it having been set up for Senna (who was much shorter in stature than the Austrian), Berger put in a feisty performance, bringing the car home in third position right behind Jean Alesi’s Tyrrell and winner Senna. The car was then used as a test and development car for McLaren’s embryonic active suspension and semi-automatic gearbox until being retired in late 1991. Body and aerodynamics Like every other Formua 1 car by the turn of the 1990s, the MP4/5B uses a carbonfibre tub structure as the basis for its chassis with the engine a fully stressed member, the last aluminium honeycomb chassis being phased out in the mid-’80s. However, while the driver’s feet were now behind the front axle line, and there was considerably more strength to the monocoque, just one glance at the car shows that the driver is exposed from the shoulders upwards in a side impact. The flipside, of course, was that the spectator had an almost unhindered view of the stars of the day at work in the cockpit. It’s also obvious just how simple the surfaces of the car are, compared with the cars of today, and the lack of any trick aero devices. It would take the unlikely form of the Leyton House March 881 to shift F1 thinking. The small British team, funded by Japanese property mogul and motorsport fan Akira Akagi, employed a young Adrian Newey to design its second F1 car, for the 1988 season, and his needle-nosed, narrow-tubbed and raised-front-floor design would set the template for F1 cars for years to come, marking him out as a talent to watch in the process. Nevertheless, Oatley was aware of the new era coming. ‘Other cars were becoming competitive, like Adrian’s Leyton House; we felt we lacked downforce,’ he says. ‘So on the 5B we had a fairly complex floor and rear diffuser – it was known as the Bat Floor because of the shape from the rear. It was efficient but we didn’t have the analysis tools [they started to come the year after], so the car was difficult to set up to make the most of the downforce. After the Silverstone race we went back to a hybrid diffuser from ’89 and the car became a lot easier to set up and we became more competitive after that.’ > Penske PC23: the anatomy of a 253mph IndyCar icon The other key car of 1990 was the beautiful Tyrell 019, designed by legendary British engineer Dr Harvey Postlethwaite, and driven by an emergent Jean Alesi. Despite ‘only’ having a Cosworth DFR in the back, this car proved a match for almost anyone on certain tracks thanks in part to its revolutionary high-nose concept: within five years every F1 car would have a high nose. In the turbo years, to make a car go faster teams had essentially run more boost and put an even bigger wing on the back; the 3.5-litre era saw the beginning of aerodynamic design playing an ever-increasing importance in the development of Grand Prix cars, and soon the simple shapes and flat surfaces would make way for far more intricate designs. Engine, gearbox & electronics One of the fascinating aspects of the 3.5-litre era is the variety in terms of engine configuration. Unlike today’s prescriptive rules, which effectively ensure that every manufacturer fields an almost identical 1.6-litre V6, back in the late ’80s and early ’90s F1 engine builders had an almost free hand to design what they liked. This led to a multitude of different engines, with their plus and minus points, and of course, a good number of different signature sounds for the fans. Simply put, the V8 route offered the best low-down torque (relatively speaking of course: these were still very peaky racing thoroughbreds) and also the lowest fuel consumption. A V8 also typically required less cooling, which exaggerated the inherent weight advantage of a smaller engine in the first place. It was, though, the least powerful option, with early Cosworth DFRs making around 600bhp, and even the championship-winning Ford Zetec-R of 1994 in the back of Michael Schumacher’s Benetton perhaps no more than 750bhp. At the other end of the scale, the 12-cylinder route offered the best power along with the highest rev limit. Initially, Ferrari was the only team to follow this route, but in time Honda would join them (perhaps determined to wrest the outright power mantle from them), as would Lamborghini and Yamaha. By 1994, the formula’s final year, the Ferrari V12 was said to be producing as much as 850bhp. However, internal friction was high, and the weight of the engine, its associated cooling components, its oil and fuel consumption, along with a weaker torque delivery, all had an effect on chassis design and made the car less driveable in certain ways. The less said about period curios, Porsche’s bloated V12, the Subaru flat-12 and the Life W12, the better, all candidates for arguably the worst F1 cars of all time. That left the V10 as arguably the best compromise, and indeed, in time it would become the preferred option, finally being cemented into the rules as the only engine configuration from the 2000 season onwards. For 1990 Honda introduced the RA100E version of its V10. Sharing the same 3490cc capacity and 72-degree V-angle as 1989’s RA109E, it generated close to 700bhp and revved out to 13,500rpm while still using conventional valve springs. It was rival Renault that introduced pneumatic valve technology, enabling higher rev limits, which would reach their peak over a decade later when the ultimate 3-litre V10s hit 20,000rpm. Still, despite its compromises, Honda’s engine probably led the pack and, as Allan McNish mentions later in this story, was superbly tractable and driveable as well as delivering immense top-end power. Want to gauge it’s true ferocity? Search for the in-car footage of Senna and Berger at Monaco that year. It’s angry... Like almost every other car in the field, the McLaren MP4/5B used a conventional manual (six-speed) gearbox, previously mounted longitudinally but transverse by the time the B model was introduced. However, a year earlier Ferrari had taken the brave step of debuting the first semi-automatic paddleshift box in F1, its unreliability costing the team a realistic shot at that year’s title. It wouldn’t be long though before every F1 car on the grid had a semi-auto ’box, a testament to the inherent rightness of the idea. As it was, rev matching was vital, and as Oatley says, ‘The gearshift was always a pain – there was always a risk of damaging the ’box.’ The 5B has quite a long, deliberate gearshift throw, apparently at the behest of Senna. ‘Ayrton had a very good feeling for the car, and was consistently trying to make it a consistent race car over a race distance [during development],’ adds Oatley. By 1993, F1 cars would be laden with electronics, which strikes a contrast with the relatively simple technology within the 5B. Suspension, tyres and brakes The 5B uses a pullrod front suspension set-up with double wishbones front and rear. Despite Williams having used a form of active suspension in 1987, the 1990 McLaren was entirely passive, but this actual car then went on to test McLaren’s own active system, introduced in 1993. By then Williams’ FW14B had dominated the 1992 championship in part thanks to its active suspension system, an advantage it kept through ’93 when Alain Prost took the title in the FW15. It was the removal of this tech, and the associated handling difficulties, that made the FW16 so difficult to drive even for Ayrton Senna at the beginning of the fatal 1994 season. Like the majority of the rest of the field, the 5B ran on Goodyear tyres. However, there was competition in the form of Pirelli, whose rubber could be very fast in certain conditions. By now, every F1 car ran with carbon brakes. Driving it Allan McNish was racing in F3000 and had been runner-up the year previously in the British F3 Championship when he stepped into the MP4/5B for the first time as a McLaren test driver during 1990. ‘They were big, meaty cars, and you had to just tighten the belts and go for it,’ he recalls today. ‘They required a different skill-set to the cars of ten years later. Your risk management with these was higher – you could damage the engine, the gearbox; if you went off at Eau Rouge you were heading for Liège Hospital. The driver was like a gladiator. It was a dangerous era – the circuits took no prisoners. ‘The car was relatively stable. It had a chunk of downforce, maybe not that efficient, but it did have lots of power. It would tend to understeer not oversteer; it was quite point-and-squirt as a general rule, but did require a bit of work mid-corner. The engine was super tractable – you could take a hairpin in fourth gear if you needed to and it would still pick up. It really did have a honking load of horsepower. The throttle pedal travel was long – 90-100mm compared to 40mm later on – so you could really control it with your foot. ‘The steering wheel was huge, and it was quite a slow steering rack. Your inputs were quite benign compared to F3 or F3000 cars. You needed a lot of lock for a hairpin, and with no PAS plus a manual and heel and toe you had to have control of the wheel. The car would dance around a lot, but the big wheel was to make it comfortable. ‘Neil understood how to win races; he had loads of experience and didn’t create one-lap wonders. Data acquisition was so limited – it was hand-written notes between driver and engineer, so that relationship was key. You get used to the power and speed quickly, but it was the braking... I was used to steel brakes so the carbon brakes and the high-speed downforce was the thing. Your neck did feel it!’ Running it today & the marketplace 03 was sold from McLaren Racing’s extraordinary stash of past F1 chassis having lain dormant for 20 years, and handed to Paul Lanzante Ltd in 2018 for a complete nut-and-bolt restoration. It was stripped completely to a bare tub, deep cleaned and every last part crack tested where required, then either replaced, replated or painted as seen fit. The only missing parts were the pedal box and the gearbox internals, which Lanzante had remanufactured with the aid of the original drawings direct from McLaren Racing. A few items around the Honda V10, such as the cable ties, weren’t available, and for this Lanzante’s Alan Murphy, who rebuilt the car over a period of three months, 3D protoyped on the basis of research. The car runs on a modern ECU, hidden inside the original box, and fresh slicks (inters and wets are available) of the correct size by Avon – despite what the logos say! Murphy added a fuel priming system, as the cars in period could lose pressure when waiting on the grid, and incorporated a water heater too. So equipped, the starting procedure is disarmingly simple: simply switch on the heater, go and have a cup of tea for 20 minutes, and when you return the V10 is good to fire. In fact, running the car is nothing like the challenge you might expect. It’s been set up with a base setting suitable for most tracks, and the same applies to the gear ratios. The ride height is raised by 10mm to protect the floor, and there’s a bit less toe-in on the front to promote tyre life, but a couple of mechanics are all you’d need to run it. Holding back slightly on the revs for the fresh V10 should give plenty of track hours. The finished car is absolutely perfect, down to the last washer. To stand next to it is to feel its powerful aura; the thought that it’s ready to be driven hard simply blows the mind... Girardo & Co sold 03 in the summer of 2022. Max Girardo feels the market is changing for F1 cars of this era: ‘There’s lots of interest now, even compared to five years ago. There was a time when people felt they were difficult to run and didn’t know what to do with them. Now there’s a real passion and love for the cars. It’s definitely a generational thing, and they’ve aged really well – they’re beautiful. There are now invitationals at Goodwood – demo runs you can do – and more places to run and show, and there’s an ecosystem around these cars to run them. The knowledge is out there to run the engines. The asking price for this car was $4million, and against supercar values of this era that seems like almost good value. The market is really moving for the 3.5-litre era.’ When the period in question included cars as special as the MP4/5B, it’s easy to understand why.
DETROIT — Fifty years later, a man who grew up in suburban Detroit tried to return a very overdue baseball book to his boyhood library. The answer: You can keep it — and no fine. Chuck Hildebrandt, 63, of Chicago said he visited the public library in Warren while in town for Thanksgiving, carrying a book titled "Baseball's Zaniest Stars." He borrowed it in 1974 as a 13-year-old "baseball nut" but never returned it. Chuck Hildebrandt of Chicago holds the book "Baseball's Zaniest Stars," which was due Dec. 4, 1974, at the Warren, Mich., library, on Dec. 10. "When you're moving with a bunch of books, you're not examining every book. You throw them in a box and go," said Hildebrandt, who lived in many cities. "But five or six years ago, I was going through the bookshelf and there was a Dewey decimal library number on the book. 'What is this?'" Inside the book was a slip of paper indicating it was due back at the Warren library on Dec. 4, 1974. Hildebrandt told The Associated Press he decided to keep the book until 2024 — the 50th anniversary — and then try to return it. He figured the library might want to publicize the long overdue exchange. Chuck Hildebrandt of Chicago shows the library slip in the overdue book "Baseball's Zaniest Stars" on Dec. 10. He said he recently met library director Oksana Urban, who listened to his pitch. Hildebrandt said he hasn't heard anything since then, though Urban told the Detroit Free Press that all is forgiven. "Some people never come back to face the music," she said of patrons with overdue books. "But there was really no music to face because he and the book were erased from our system." So "Baseball's Zaniest Stars" is back on Hildebrandt's shelf. In return, he's now trying to raise $4,564 for Reading is Fundamental , a nonprofit literacy group. The amount roughly represents a 50-year overdue library fine. Hildebrandt seeded the effort with $457. The Major League Baseball draft is unique among professional sports drafts. The 30 organizations pick teenagers and college students who will not join their big league clubs for years—if ever. These athletes will spend that time honing their craft in the minor leagues, where long bus rides and minuscule paychecks are the norm. A few will move quickly up the ranks, seizing playing time opportunities to advance their careers and making their names known to scouts, fans, and other observers around the country. Some of the best will become MLB stars, but there's minimal correlation to draft position. Four of the players on this list were picked after hundreds of other diamond darlings, and only two were #1 overall selections. There's also more than a handful who didn't do much for the teams that drafted them, including superstars such as Nolan Ryan, Ozzie Smith, and Randy Johnson. Each of these players was traded before they evolved into Hall of Famers. Still, calling the draft a "crapshoot" might be going too far. College players are " slightly more likely " than high schoolers to reach the revered stadiums of the majors, and third-rounders have a better chance than fifth-rounders, for example, though the margins are slim, as Vice reported. Teams not only make picks based on years-in-advance projections but also whether they can sign players, a step that must be completed before those youngsters begin playing professionally. To see how clubs have fared since the inaugural draft in 1965, ATS.io compiled a list of the best draft pick by each franchise using data from Baseball Reference . The players were ranked using career wins above replacement , so not one recent choice was named. The amazing Mike Trout, a 32-year-old selected in 2009, is the youngest player. Unsigned picks were not considered, and players who were traded as picks were credited to their acquiring teams. Data is as of June 5, 2024. - Draft: 1st overall pick in 1990 - Position: Shortstop - Games played: 2,499 - Career stats: 468 home runs, .303 batting average, .930 on-base plus slugging - College/HS: The Bolles School (Jacksonville, Fla.) - Wins above replacement: 85.3 - Draft: 48th overall pick in 1978 - Position: Third baseman - Games played: 3,001 - Career stats: 431 home runs, .276 batting average, .788 on-base plus slugging - College/HS: Aberdeen HS (Aberdeen, Md.) - Wins above replacement: 95.9 - Draft: 19th overall pick in 1983 - Position: Pitcher - Games played: 709 - Career stats: 354 wins, 3.12 earned run average, 1.17 walks plus hits per inning - College/HS: University of Texas at Austin (Austin, Texas) - Wins above replacement: 139.2 - Draft: 31st overall pick in 1984 - Position: Pitcher - Games played: 744 - Career stats: 355 wins, 3.16 earned run average, 1.14 walks plus hits per inning - College/HS: Valley HS (Las Vegas, Nev.) - Wins above replacement: 106.6 - Draft: 7th overall pick in 1989 - Position: First baseman - Games played: 2,322 - Career stats: 521 home runs, .301 batting average, .974 on-base plus slugging - College/HS: Auburn University (Auburn, Ala.) - Wins above replacement: 73.8 - Draft: 36th overall pick in 1965 - Position: Catcher - Games played: 2,158 - Career stats: 389 home runs, .267 batting average, .817 on-base plus slugging - College/HS: Binger HS (Binger, Okla.) - Wins above replacement: 75.1 - Draft: 333rd overall pick in 1989 - Position: Shortstop - Games played: 2,543 - Career stats: 612 home runs, .276 batting average, .956 on-base plus slugging - College/HS: Illinois Central College (East Peoria, Ill.) - Wins above replacement: 73.1 - Draft: 8th overall pick in 1995 - Position: First baseman - Games played: 2,247 - Career stats: 369 home runs, .316 batting average, .953 on-base plus slugging - College/HS: University of Tennessee (Knoxville, Tenn.) - Wins above replacement: 61.8 - Draft: 2nd overall pick in 2004 - Position: Pitcher - Games played: 518 - Career stats: 260 wins, 3.25 earned run average, 1.12 walks plus hits per inning - College/HS: Old Dominion University (Norfolk, Va.) - Wins above replacement: 81.7 - Draft: 428th overall pick in 1988 - Position: Outfielder - Games played: 2,103 - Career stats: 130 home runs, .299 batting average, .794 on-base plus slugging - College/HS: University of Arizona (Tucson, Ariz.) - Wins above replacement: 68.4 - Draft: 29th overall pick in 1971 - Position: Shortstop - Games played: 2,707 - Career stats: 317 home runs, .305 batting average, .857 on-base plus slugging - College/HS: El Segundo HS (El Segundo, Calif.) - Wins above replacement: 88.6 - Draft: 25th overall pick in 2009 - Position: Centerfielder - Games played: 1,518 - Career stats: 378 home runs, .299 batting average, .991 on-base plus slugging - College/HS: Millville Senior HS (Millville, N.J.) - Wins above replacement: 86.1 - Draft: 7th overall pick in 2006 - Position: Pitcher - Games played: 425 - Career stats: 210 wins, 2.48 earned run average, 1.00 walks plus hits per inning - College/HS: Highland Park HS (Dallas, Texas) - Wins above replacement: 79.7 - Draft: 76th overall pick in 2007 - Position: First baseman - Games played: 1,589 - Career stats: 417 home runs, .258 batting average, .874 on-base plus slugging - College/HS: Notre Dame HS (Sherman Oaks, Calif.) - Wins above replacement: 44.3 - Draft: 3rd overall pick in 1973 - Position: Shortstop - Games played: 2,856 - Career stats: 251 home runs, .285 batting average, .772 on-base plus slugging - College/HS: William Howard Taft Charter HS (Woodland Hills, Calif.) - Wins above replacement: 77.4 - Draft: 55th overall pick in 1969 - Position: Pitcher - Games played: 692 - Career stats: 287 wins, 3.31 earned run average, 1.20 walks plus hits per inning - College/HS: Santiago HS (Garden Grove, Calif.) - Wins above replacement: 94.5 - Draft: 295th overall pick in 1965 - Position: Pitcher - Games played: 807 - Career stats: 324 wins, 3.19 earned run average, 1.25 walks plus hits per inning - College/HS: Alvin HS (Alvin, Texas) - Wins above replacement: 81.3 - Draft: 6th overall pick in 1992 - Position: Shortstop - Games played: 2,747 - Career stats: 260 home runs, .310 batting average, .817 on-base plus slugging - College/HS: Central HS (Kalamazoo, Mich.) - Wins above replacement: 71.3 - Draft: 96th overall pick in 1976 - Position: Outfielder - Games played: 3,081 - Career stats: 297 home runs, .279 batting average, .820 on-base plus slugging - College/HS: Oakland Technical HS (Oakland, Calif.) - Wins above replacement: 111.1 - Draft: 30th overall pick in 1971 - Position: Shortstop - Games played: 2,404 - Career stats: 548 home runs, .268 batting average, .908 on-base plus slugging - College/HS: Ohio University (Athens, Ohio) - Wins above replacement: 106.9 - Draft: 6th overall pick in 1985 - Position: Outfielder - Games played: 2,986 - Career stats: 762 home runs, .298 batting average, 1.051 on-base plus slugging - College/HS: Arizona State University (Tempe, Ariz.) - Wins above replacement: 162.8 - Draft: 86th overall pick in 1977 - Position: Shortstop - Games played: 2,573 - Career stats: 28 home runs, .262 batting average, .666 on-base plus slugging - College/HS: California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo (San Luis Obispo, Calif.) - Wins above replacement: 76.9 - Draft: 1st overall pick in 1993 - Position: Shortstop - Games played: 2,784 - Career stats: 696 home runs, .295 batting average, .930 on-base plus slugging - College/HS: Westminster Christian School (Miami, Fla.) - Wins above replacement: 117.6 - Draft: 402nd overall pick in 1999 - Position: Third baseman - Games played: 3,080 - Career stats: 703 home runs, .296 batting average, .918 on-base plus slugging - College/HS: Metropolitan Community College-Maple Woods (Kansas City, Mo.) - Wins above replacement: 101.4 - Draft: 3rd overall pick in 2006 - Position: Third baseman - Games played: 1,986 - Career stats: 342 home runs, .264 batting average, .804 on-base plus slugging - College/HS: California State University, Long Beach (Long Beach, Calif.) - Wins above replacement: 58.6 - Draft: 4th overall pick in 1986 - Position: Pitcher - Games played: 486 - Career stats: 211 wins, 3.28 earned run average, 1.22 walks plus hits per inning - College/HS: Georgia Institute of Technology (Atlanta, Ga.) - Wins above replacement: 67.8 - Draft: 17th overall pick in 1995 - Position: Pitcher - Games played: 416 - Career stats: 203 wins, 3.38 earned run average, 1.18 walks plus hits per inning - College/HS: Arvada West HS (Arvada, Colo.) - Wins above replacement: 64.2 - Draft: 36th overall pick in 1985 - Position: Pitcher - Games played: 618 - Career stats: 303 wins, 3.29 earned run average, 1.17 walks plus hits per inning - College/HS: University of Southern California (Los Angeles, Calif.) - Wins above replacement: 101.1 Data reporting by Karim Noorani. Story editing by Carren Jao. Additional editing by Kelly Glass. Copy editing by Robert Wickwire. Photo selection by Clarese Moller. This story originally appeared on ATS.io and was produced and distributed in partnership with Stacker Studio. - Draft: 11th overall pick in 2006 - Position: Pitcher - Games played: 457 - Career stats: 214 wins, 3.15 earned run average, 1.08 walks plus hits per inning - College/HS: University of Missouri (Columbia, Mo.) - Wins above replacement: 75.0 - Draft: 2nd overall pick in 1985 - Position: First baseman - Games played: 1,976 - Career stats: 284 home runs, .303 batting average, .880 on-base plus slugging - College/HS: Mississippi State University (Mississippi State, Miss.) - Wins above replacement: 56.5 Receive the latest in local entertainment news in your inbox weekly!
Prominent figure from Canada's trucker protests against COVID-19 restrictions found guiltyDETROIT — Fifty years later, a man who grew up in suburban Detroit tried to return a very overdue baseball book to his boyhood library. The answer: You can keep it — and no fine. Chuck Hildebrandt, 63, of Chicago said he visited the public library in Warren while in town for Thanksgiving, carrying a book titled "Baseball's Zaniest Stars." He borrowed it in 1974 as a 13-year-old "baseball nut" but never returned it. Chuck Hildebrandt of Chicago holds the book "Baseball's Zaniest Stars," which was due Dec. 4, 1974, at the Warren, Mich., library, on Dec. 10. "When you're moving with a bunch of books, you're not examining every book. You throw them in a box and go," said Hildebrandt, who lived in many cities. "But five or six years ago, I was going through the bookshelf and there was a Dewey decimal library number on the book. 'What is this?'" Inside the book was a slip of paper indicating it was due back at the Warren library on Dec. 4, 1974. Hildebrandt told The Associated Press he decided to keep the book until 2024 — the 50th anniversary — and then try to return it. He figured the library might want to publicize the long overdue exchange. Chuck Hildebrandt of Chicago shows the library slip in the overdue book "Baseball's Zaniest Stars" on Dec. 10. He said he recently met library director Oksana Urban, who listened to his pitch. Hildebrandt said he hasn't heard anything since then, though Urban told the Detroit Free Press that all is forgiven. "Some people never come back to face the music," she said of patrons with overdue books. "But there was really no music to face because he and the book were erased from our system." So "Baseball's Zaniest Stars" is back on Hildebrandt's shelf. In return, he's now trying to raise $4,564 for Reading is Fundamental , a nonprofit literacy group. The amount roughly represents a 50-year overdue library fine. Hildebrandt seeded the effort with $457. The Major League Baseball draft is unique among professional sports drafts. The 30 organizations pick teenagers and college students who will not join their big league clubs for years—if ever. These athletes will spend that time honing their craft in the minor leagues, where long bus rides and minuscule paychecks are the norm. A few will move quickly up the ranks, seizing playing time opportunities to advance their careers and making their names known to scouts, fans, and other observers around the country. Some of the best will become MLB stars, but there's minimal correlation to draft position. Four of the players on this list were picked after hundreds of other diamond darlings, and only two were #1 overall selections. There's also more than a handful who didn't do much for the teams that drafted them, including superstars such as Nolan Ryan, Ozzie Smith, and Randy Johnson. Each of these players was traded before they evolved into Hall of Famers. Still, calling the draft a "crapshoot" might be going too far. College players are " slightly more likely " than high schoolers to reach the revered stadiums of the majors, and third-rounders have a better chance than fifth-rounders, for example, though the margins are slim, as Vice reported. Teams not only make picks based on years-in-advance projections but also whether they can sign players, a step that must be completed before those youngsters begin playing professionally. To see how clubs have fared since the inaugural draft in 1965, ATS.io compiled a list of the best draft pick by each franchise using data from Baseball Reference . The players were ranked using career wins above replacement , so not one recent choice was named. The amazing Mike Trout, a 32-year-old selected in 2009, is the youngest player. Unsigned picks were not considered, and players who were traded as picks were credited to their acquiring teams. Data is as of June 5, 2024. - Draft: 11th overall pick in 2006 - Position: Pitcher - Games played: 457 - Career stats: 214 wins, 3.15 earned run average, 1.08 walks plus hits per inning - College/HS: University of Missouri (Columbia, Mo.) - Wins above replacement: 75.0 - Draft: 1st overall pick in 1990 - Position: Shortstop - Games played: 2,499 - Career stats: 468 home runs, .303 batting average, .930 on-base plus slugging - College/HS: The Bolles School (Jacksonville, Fla.) - Wins above replacement: 85.3 - Draft: 48th overall pick in 1978 - Position: Third baseman - Games played: 3,001 - Career stats: 431 home runs, .276 batting average, .788 on-base plus slugging - College/HS: Aberdeen HS (Aberdeen, Md.) - Wins above replacement: 95.9 - Draft: 19th overall pick in 1983 - Position: Pitcher - Games played: 709 - Career stats: 354 wins, 3.12 earned run average, 1.17 walks plus hits per inning - College/HS: University of Texas at Austin (Austin, Texas) - Wins above replacement: 139.2 - Draft: 31st overall pick in 1984 - Position: Pitcher - Games played: 744 - Career stats: 355 wins, 3.16 earned run average, 1.14 walks plus hits per inning - College/HS: Valley HS (Las Vegas, Nev.) - Wins above replacement: 106.6 - Draft: 7th overall pick in 1989 - Position: First baseman - Games played: 2,322 - Career stats: 521 home runs, .301 batting average, .974 on-base plus slugging - College/HS: Auburn University (Auburn, Ala.) - Wins above replacement: 73.8 - Draft: 36th overall pick in 1965 - Position: Catcher - Games played: 2,158 - Career stats: 389 home runs, .267 batting average, .817 on-base plus slugging - College/HS: Binger HS (Binger, Okla.) - Wins above replacement: 75.1 - Draft: 333rd overall pick in 1989 - Position: Shortstop - Games played: 2,543 - Career stats: 612 home runs, .276 batting average, .956 on-base plus slugging - College/HS: Illinois Central College (East Peoria, Ill.) - Wins above replacement: 73.1 - Draft: 8th overall pick in 1995 - Position: First baseman - Games played: 2,247 - Career stats: 369 home runs, .316 batting average, .953 on-base plus slugging - College/HS: University of Tennessee (Knoxville, Tenn.) - Wins above replacement: 61.8 - Draft: 2nd overall pick in 2004 - Position: Pitcher - Games played: 518 - Career stats: 260 wins, 3.25 earned run average, 1.12 walks plus hits per inning - College/HS: Old Dominion University (Norfolk, Va.) - Wins above replacement: 81.7 - Draft: 428th overall pick in 1988 - Position: Outfielder - Games played: 2,103 - Career stats: 130 home runs, .299 batting average, .794 on-base plus slugging - College/HS: University of Arizona (Tucson, Ariz.) - Wins above replacement: 68.4 - Draft: 29th overall pick in 1971 - Position: Shortstop - Games played: 2,707 - Career stats: 317 home runs, .305 batting average, .857 on-base plus slugging - College/HS: El Segundo HS (El Segundo, Calif.) - Wins above replacement: 88.6 - Draft: 25th overall pick in 2009 - Position: Centerfielder - Games played: 1,518 - Career stats: 378 home runs, .299 batting average, .991 on-base plus slugging - College/HS: Millville Senior HS (Millville, N.J.) - Wins above replacement: 86.1 - Draft: 7th overall pick in 2006 - Position: Pitcher - Games played: 425 - Career stats: 210 wins, 2.48 earned run average, 1.00 walks plus hits per inning - College/HS: Highland Park HS (Dallas, Texas) - Wins above replacement: 79.7 - Draft: 76th overall pick in 2007 - Position: First baseman - Games played: 1,589 - Career stats: 417 home runs, .258 batting average, .874 on-base plus slugging - College/HS: Notre Dame HS (Sherman Oaks, Calif.) - Wins above replacement: 44.3 - Draft: 3rd overall pick in 1973 - Position: Shortstop - Games played: 2,856 - Career stats: 251 home runs, .285 batting average, .772 on-base plus slugging - College/HS: William Howard Taft Charter HS (Woodland Hills, Calif.) - Wins above replacement: 77.4 - Draft: 55th overall pick in 1969 - Position: Pitcher - Games played: 692 - Career stats: 287 wins, 3.31 earned run average, 1.20 walks plus hits per inning - College/HS: Santiago HS (Garden Grove, Calif.) - Wins above replacement: 94.5 - Draft: 6th overall pick in 1992 - Position: Shortstop - Games played: 2,747 - Career stats: 260 home runs, .310 batting average, .817 on-base plus slugging - College/HS: Central HS (Kalamazoo, Mich.) - Wins above replacement: 71.3 - Draft: 96th overall pick in 1976 - Position: Outfielder - Games played: 3,081 - Career stats: 297 home runs, .279 batting average, .820 on-base plus slugging - College/HS: Oakland Technical HS (Oakland, Calif.) - Wins above replacement: 111.1 - Draft: 30th overall pick in 1971 - Position: Shortstop - Games played: 2,404 - Career stats: 548 home runs, .268 batting average, .908 on-base plus slugging - College/HS: Ohio University (Athens, Ohio) - Wins above replacement: 106.9 - Draft: 6th overall pick in 1985 - Position: Outfielder - Games played: 2,986 - Career stats: 762 home runs, .298 batting average, 1.051 on-base plus slugging - College/HS: Arizona State University (Tempe, Ariz.) - Wins above replacement: 162.8 - Draft: 86th overall pick in 1977 - Position: Shortstop - Games played: 2,573 - Career stats: 28 home runs, .262 batting average, .666 on-base plus slugging - College/HS: California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo (San Luis Obispo, Calif.) - Wins above replacement: 76.9 - Draft: 2nd overall pick in 1985 - Position: First baseman - Games played: 1,976 - Career stats: 284 home runs, .303 batting average, .880 on-base plus slugging - College/HS: Mississippi State University (Mississippi State, Miss.) - Wins above replacement: 56.5 - Draft: 1st overall pick in 1993 - Position: Shortstop - Games played: 2,784 - Career stats: 696 home runs, .295 batting average, .930 on-base plus slugging - College/HS: Westminster Christian School (Miami, Fla.) - Wins above replacement: 117.6 - Draft: 402nd overall pick in 1999 - Position: Third baseman - Games played: 3,080 - Career stats: 703 home runs, .296 batting average, .918 on-base plus slugging - College/HS: Metropolitan Community College-Maple Woods (Kansas City, Mo.) - Wins above replacement: 101.4 - Draft: 3rd overall pick in 2006 - Position: Third baseman - Games played: 1,986 - Career stats: 342 home runs, .264 batting average, .804 on-base plus slugging - College/HS: California State University, Long Beach (Long Beach, Calif.) - Wins above replacement: 58.6 - Draft: 4th overall pick in 1986 - Position: Pitcher - Games played: 486 - Career stats: 211 wins, 3.28 earned run average, 1.22 walks plus hits per inning - College/HS: Georgia Institute of Technology (Atlanta, Ga.) - Wins above replacement: 67.8 - Draft: 17th overall pick in 1995 - Position: Pitcher - Games played: 416 - Career stats: 203 wins, 3.38 earned run average, 1.18 walks plus hits per inning - College/HS: Arvada West HS (Arvada, Colo.) - Wins above replacement: 64.2 - Draft: 36th overall pick in 1985 - Position: Pitcher - Games played: 618 - Career stats: 303 wins, 3.29 earned run average, 1.17 walks plus hits per inning - College/HS: University of Southern California (Los Angeles, Calif.) - Wins above replacement: 101.1 Data reporting by Karim Noorani. Story editing by Carren Jao. Additional editing by Kelly Glass. Copy editing by Robert Wickwire. Photo selection by Clarese Moller. This story originally appeared on ATS.io and was produced and distributed in partnership with Stacker Studio. - Draft: 295th overall pick in 1965 - Position: Pitcher - Games played: 807 - Career stats: 324 wins, 3.19 earned run average, 1.25 walks plus hits per inning - College/HS: Alvin HS (Alvin, Texas) - Wins above replacement: 81.3 Stay up-to-date on what's happening Receive the latest in local entertainment news in your inbox weekly!
The rumor mill is churning with whispers of Google’s upcoming Pixel 10 Pro, and amidst the leaks and speculations, a captivating concept video has emerged, showcasing a radical redesign of the phone’s iconic camera bar. This vision, brought to life by designer Angelo Libero, ditches the familiar horizontal visor for a unique, asymmetrical arrangement that’s sure to turn heads. But is this just a flight of fancy, or could it hint at Google’s future design direction? Let’s delve into the details and explore the possibilities. This concept video, making waves on the internet, offers a tantalizing glimpse into what the Pixel 10 Pro could look like. Libero’s design reimagines the camera bar, shifting from the traditional horizontal strip to a more dynamic, offset layout. This change not only gives the phone a fresh aesthetic but also sparks curiosity about the potential impact on camera performance and user experience . While Google hasn’t officially confirmed any design details, this concept video fuels the excitement surrounding the Pixel 10 Pro and invites us to consider the future of smartphone photography. Breaking Down the Design Libero’s concept video showcases a Pixel 10 Pro with a bold camera setup. The camera bar, a defining feature of Pixel phones, is reimagined as an “L” shape, housing the phone’s impressive camera array. This unconventional design immediately sets it apart from its predecessors and competitors. Here’s a closer look at the design elements: More Than Just Aesthetics? While the redesigned camera bar undoubtedly makes a visual statement , it also raises questions about its practical implications. Could this new arrangement enhance the phone’s photographic capabilities? Here are some potential advantages: However, there are also potential drawbacks to consider: A Glimpse into the Future? It’s crucial to remember that this is a concept video, not an official leak or confirmation from Google. While Libero’s design is imaginative and thought-provoking, it’s uncertain whether Google will adopt such a radical change for the Pixel 10 Pro. However, concept videos like this play a crucial role in the tech world. They spark conversations, fuel anticipation, and push the boundaries of design. They offer a glimpse into what’s possible, inspiring manufacturers to explore new ideas and innovate. Google has a history of experimenting with camera design in its Pixel lineup . From the original Pixel’s subtle camera bump to the distinctive visor of the Pixel 6 and 7 series, Google has never shied away from making bold design choices. Considering this history, it’s not entirely implausible that Google might consider a significant camera redesign for the Pixel 10 Pro. Whether they embrace the “L” shape or opt for a different approach, one thing is certain: Google will continue to push the boundaries of smartphone photography, both in terms of technology and design. What We Know (and Don’t Know) About the Pixel 10 Pro Beyond the camera design, there’s much speculation about the Pixel 10 Pro’s other features and specifications. Here’s a roundup of what we’ve gathered from various sources: Expected Features: Uncertainties: The Pixel 10 Pro: A Camera-Centric Future? Google’s Pixel phones have consistently been lauded for their exceptional camera performance , often surpassing the competition in image quality and computational photography. With the Pixel 10 Pro, Google seems poised to further solidify its position as a leader in smartphone photography. Whether the concept video’s radical camera redesign becomes a reality or not, it’s evident that Google is committed to innovation. The Pixel 10 Pro is shaping up to be a highly anticipated device, and camera enthusiasts are eagerly awaiting its arrival.Formula one, two: Meet the Perth twins driving the next generation in STEM
1 2 Lucknow: Addressing various events to mark the birth anniversary of former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee , organised on the eve of his 100the birth anniversary, chief minister Yogi Adityanath said that Vajpayee had steered Indian politics from instability to stability. The CM, along with defence minister Rajnath Singh , inaugurated a two-day long Atal Health Fair in Lucknow, followed by a Yuva Kumbh. The CM described Vajpayee as the ‘Ajatshatru' of Indian politics, praising him for his spontaneity and simplicity, which endeared him to people across all sections of society. At the health fair, the CM and defence minister inaugurated and laid the foundation for 181 projects worth Rs 662 crore. "Atalji, who represented Lucknow as an MP five times, revolutionised Indian politics. He also brought Pt Deendayal Upadhyay's vision of Antyodaya to life. Inspired by his legacy, the Atal Health Fair continues to deliver healthcare services to the underprivileged and needy," the CM said, adding that health fairs were first launched when Vajpayee was PM in 1998-99. The practice was discontinued but was revived by his government five years ago and between 2020 and 2023, over 50,000 people had benefited from them. During a distribution of assistive devices like prosthetic limbs, tricycles, wheelchairs, and blind sticks at the health fair, the CM spoke about the various initiatives taken to empower disabled persons under the PM Narendra Modi government, including an increase in their annual pension to Rs 12,000. At the Atal Yuva Maha Kumbh, organised at the KD Singh Babu Stadium, the CM highlighted that the theme of the programme was ‘Kadam se Kadam Milakar Chalna Hoga'. He said that such events exemplify the profound respect and admiration that people had for Vajpayee. He also credited public representatives for creating platforms that ensured that Vajpayee's legacy remained alive through their collective efforts. "The ‘Yuva Kumbh' serves to revive the cherished memories associated with the Kumbh, an event rooted in the tradition of Sanatan Dharma. The Kumbh represents India's identity, embodying the fusion of Sanatan wisdom and spiritual energy. The spirit of the grand Kumbh Mela, scheduled to take place in Prayagraj from January 13 to February 26, is being reflected here today," the CM said. The CM also recited a poem penned by Vajpayee, ‘Kadam Milakar Chalna Hoga'. Referring to the rain that lashed Lucknow on Tuesday morning, the CM said that he had contacted the organisers earlier in the day to confirm if the event would take place and was assured that it would be a grand celebration. He noted that despite the weather conditions, children had participated in the event with great enthusiasm. He said Wednesday would mark the birth centenary of Vajpayee and congratulated the children who had secured positions in the competitions held on Tuesday and encouraged all the participating children by saying "if people walked together, they could achieve their goal". Stay updated with the latest news on Times of India . Don't miss daily games like Crossword , Sudoku , Location Guesser and Mini Crossword . Spread love this holiday season with these Christmas wishes , messages , and quotes .Peak after peak... leasing of offices shows no fatigueAndalucía Trade organizes a “trade mission” to the ‘European Hydrogen Week’ in Belgium with six Andalusian companies
Global Medical REIT (NYSE:GMRE) Hits New 1-Year Low – Should You Sell?
Tinubu hails Guards Brigade on security of FCT, environsColorado adds record insurance coverage for Sanders and Hunter before Alamo Bowl