hình ảnh của mcw casino

Scheffler goes on a run of birdies in the Bahamas and leads by 2The Kremlin fired a new intermediate-range ballistic missile at Ukraine on Thursday in response to Kyiv's use this week of American and British missiles capable of striking deeper into Russia, President Vladimir Putin said. In a televised address to the country, the Russian president warned that U.S. air defense systems would be powerless to stop the new missile, which he said flies at ten times the speed of sound and which he called the Oreshnik — Russian for hazelnut tree. He also said it could be used to attack any Ukrainian ally whose missiles are used to attack Russia. “We believe that we have the right to use our weapons against military facilities of the countries that allow to use their weapons against our facilities,” Putin said in his first comments since President Joe Biden gave Ukraine the green light this month to use U.S. ATACMS missiles to strike at limited targets inside Russia. Pentagon deputy press secretary Sabrina Singh confirmed that Russia’s missile was a new, experimental type of intermediate range missile based on it’s RS-26 Rubezh intercontinental ballistic missile. “This was new type of lethal capability that was deployed on the battlefield, so that was certainly of concern," Singh said, noting that the missile could carry either conventional or nuclear warheads. The U.S. was notified ahead of the launch through nuclear risk reduction channels, she said. The attack on the central Ukrainian city of Dnipro came in response to Kyiv's use of longer-range U.S. and British missiles in strikes Tuesday and Wednesday on southern Russia, Putin said. Those strikes caused a fire at an ammunition depot in Russia's Bryansk region and killed and wounded some security services personnel in the Kursk region, he said. “In the event of an escalation of aggressive actions, we will respond decisively and in kind,” the Russian president said, adding that Western leaders who are hatching plans to use their forces against Moscow should “seriously think about this.” Putin said the Oreshnik fired Thursday struck a well-known missile factory in Dnipro. He also said Russia would issue advance warnings if it launches more strikes with the Oreshnik against Ukraine to allow civilians to evacuate to safety — something Moscow hasn’t done before previous aerial attacks. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov initially said Russia hadn’t warned the U.S. about the coming launch of the new missile, noting that it wasn't obligated to do so. But he later changed tack and said Moscow did issue a warning 30 minutes before the launch. Putin's announcement came hours after Ukraine claimed that Russia had used an intercontinental ballistic missile in the Dnipro attack, which wounded two people and damaged an industrial facility and rehabilitation center for people with disabilities, according to local officials. But American officials said an initial U.S. assessment indicated the strike was carried out with an intermediate-range ballistic missile. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said in a Telegram post that the use of the missile was an "obvious and serious escalation in the scale and brutality of this war, a cynical violation of the UN Charter.” He also said there had been “no strong global reaction” to the use of the missile, which he said could threaten other countries. “Putin is very sensitive to this. He is testing you, dear partners,” Zelenskyy wrote. “If there is no tough response to Russia’s actions, it means they see that such actions are possible.” The attack comes during a week of escalating tensions , as the U.S. eased restrictions on Ukraine's use of American-made longer-range missiles inside Russia and Putin lowered the threshold for launching nuclear weapons. The Ukrainian air force said in a statement that the Dnipro attack was launched from Russia’s Astrakhan region, on the Caspian Sea. “Today, our crazy neighbor once again showed what he really is,” Zelenskyy said hours before Putin's address. “And how afraid he is.” Russia was sending a message by attacking Ukraine with an intermediate-range ballistic missile capable of releasing multiple warheads at extremely high speeds, even if they are less accurate than cruise missiles or short-range ballistic missiles, said Matthew Savill, director of military sciences at the Royal United Services Institute, a London-based think tank. “Why might you use it therefore?” Savill said. "Signaling — signaling to the Ukrainians. We’ve got stuff that outrages you. But really signaling to the West ‘We’re happy to enter into a competition around intermediate range ballistic missiles. P.S.: These could be nuclear tipped. Do you really want to take that risk?’” Military experts say that modern ICBMs and IRBMs are extremely difficult to intercept, although Ukraine has previously claimed to have stopped some other weapons that Russia described as “unstoppable,” including the air-launched Kinzhal hypersonic missile. David Albright, of the Washington-based think tank the Institute for Science and International Security, said he was “skeptical” of Putin’s claim, adding that Russian technology sometimes “falls short.” He suggested Putin was “taunting the West to try to shoot it down ... like a braggart boasting, taunting his enemy.” Earlier this week, the Biden administration authorized Ukraine to use the U.S.-supplied, longer-range missiles to strike deeper inside Russia — a move that drew an angry response from Moscow. Days later, Ukraine fired several of the missiles into Russia, according to the Kremlin. The same day, Putin signed a new doctrine that allows for a potential nuclear response even to a conventional attack on Russia by any nation that is supported by a nuclear power. The doctrine is formulated broadly to avoid a firm commitment to use nuclear weapons. In response, Western countries, including the U.S., said Russia has used irresponsible nuclear rhetoric and behavior throughout the war to intimidate Ukraine and other nations. White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said Thursday that Russia’s formal lowering of the threshold for nuclear weapons use did not prompt any changes in U.S. doctrine. She pushed back on concerns that the decision to allow Ukraine to use Western missiles to strike deeper inside Russia might escalate the war. ′′They’re the ones who are escalating this,” she said of the Kremlin — in part because of a flood of North Korean troops sent to the region. More than 1,000 days into war , Russia has the upper hand, with its larger army advancing in Donetsk and Ukrainian civilians suffering from relentless drone and missile strikes. Analysts and observers say the loosening of restrictions on Ukraine's use of Western missiles is unlikely to change the the course of the war, but it puts the Russian army in a more vulnerable position and could complicate the logistics that are crucial in warfare. Putin has also warned that the move would mean that Russia and NATO are at war. “It is an important move and it pulls against, undermines the narrative that Putin had been trying to establish that it was fine for Russia to rain down Iranian drones and North Korean missiles on Ukraine but a reckless escalation for Ukraine to use Western-supplied weapons at legitimate targets in Russia,” said Peter Ricketts, a former U.K. national security adviser who now sits in the House of Lords. ___ Associated Press writers Jill Lawless and Emma Burrows in London, and Zeke Miller and Lolita C. Baldor in Washington contributed to this report. ___ Follow AP’s coverage of the war in Ukraine at https://apnews.com/hub/russia-ukrainehình ảnh của mcw casino 。

The next NFL coaching cycle will feature an impressive list of candidates ranging from proven champions to up-and-coming coordinators.Rising geopolitical tensions, Adani ‘bribery’ case add to Indian market's woes — expert advice | Stock Market News - Mint

LSU 109, UCF 102, 3OT

AP Sports SummaryBrief at 6:25 p.m. ESTCD Projekt Red Won't Say Which, If Any, Current Consoles Can Handle The Witcher 4

The Real Good Food Company Receives Anticipated Additional Delinquency Notice from NasdaqNEW DELHI: Ending a five-decade-old debate on insertions of words 'socialist' and 'secular' in the Preamble of the Constitution, the Supreme Court on Monday upheld the Emergency-era amendment to the Preamble and said these words neither impede private entrepreneurship nor fetter govt from getting rid of obnoxious religious practices. Throwing out challenge to the 42nd constitutional amendment that inserted these two words along with 'integrity' in the Preamble in 1976 by the Indira Gandhi govt, a bench of CJI Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar said secularism mandates the govt not to favour any religion but it does not prevent elimination of religious attitudes and practices impeding development and right to equality. IPL 2025 mega auction IPL Auction 2025: Who went where and for how much IPL 2025: Complete list of players of each franchise It said despite freedom of religion guaranteed to the citizens and their non-discrimination on the ground of their faith, the Constitution under the Directive Principles of State Policy permits the govt to strive for a Uniform Civil Code (UCC), a hot topic in the Indian polity since the Shah Bano case judgment of the SC in 1985. The bench said socialism in the Indian context does not restrict economic policies of an elected govt. "Neither the Constitution nor the Preamble mandates a specific economic policy or structure, whether left or right. Rather, 'socialist' denotes the State's commitment to be a welfare State and its commitment to ensuring equality of opportunity," it said. It said the socialism practised in India aims to achieve the goal of economic and social upliftment of citizens and in no way restricts private entrepreneurship and the right to do business, which is guaranteed as a fundamental right under Article 19(1)(9g). CJI Khanna-led bench said, "India has consistently embraced a mixed economy model, where the private sector has flourished, expanded and grown over the years, contributing significantly to the upliftment of marginalised and underprivileged sections in different ways. In the Indian framework, socialism embodies the principle of economic and social justice, wherein the State ensures that no citizen is disadvantaged due to economic or social circumstances." The challenge to the 42nd amendment was mounted by a PIL in 2020, a good 44 years after the insertion of the words 'socialist' and 'secular' in the Preamble on the grounds - the framers of the Constitution had omitted these two words from the Preamble after long deliberations; the word 'socialist' restricted the govt's choice of economic policy; and, that the amendment was passed on Nov 2, 1976, nearly eight months after the term of Lok Sabha got over on Mar 18, 1976. "We do not find any legitimate cause or justification for challenging the constitutional amendment after nearly 44 years," the bench said. The SC said the power to amend the Constitution rests only with Parliament and this power extends to amending the Preamble. On the validity of insertion of 'secular' in Preamble, the SC said, "Over time, India has developed its own interpretation of secularism, wherein the State neither supports any religion nor penalises the profession and practice of any faith." Listing several fundamental rights under the Constitution, which bars govt from discriminating citizens on the ground of faith and allows people to profess a religion of their choice while allowing minority communities from establishing and administering their educational institutions, the bench said, "Despite these provisions, Article 44 in the Directive Principles of State Policy permits the state to strive for a uniform civil code for its citizens."

Gaetz withdraws as Trump's pick for attorney general, averting confirmation battle in the SenateCME Group Inc. Cl A stock underperforms Friday when compared to competitorsAP Sports SummaryBrief at 6:25 p.m. EST

Is Nvidia’s Dominance on the Brink of a Major Change?

Red Bulls go into MLS Cup final with distinctly Canadian flavour in front officeDrysdale property where two homes will double the fun

Drysdale property where two homes will double the funCarrefour's cold shoulder for South American beef sparks a backlash from Brazil

The New York Mets almost reached the World Series in 2024. After falling just short they could be aggressive this winter as they try to improve their rotation. While listing top landing spots for Rōki Sasaki, FanSided's Christopher Kline named the Mets as potential suitors for the Chiba Lotte Marines star. "Senga has cemented his status as an ace, but Jose Quintana, Luis Severino, and Sean Manaea are all free agents this winter. The Mets need to restock in the rotation and Sasaki is imminently appealing," wrote Kline. "Even with potential workload restrictions and a slow-burn developmental track, the 23-year-old carries immediate All-Star potential. He's going to contribute next season and the Mets are looking to improve on an NLCS appearance. It's an obvious match." Sasaki is an amateur free agent. Teams will not be able to hand him a massive contract like Yoshinobu Yamamoto received last winter. They will only be able to use funds allotted to them from the international signing bonus pool. MLB commissioner Rob Manfred said he expects Sasaki to sign in the 2025 signing period, according to ESPN's Jorge Castillo . When the 2025 period opens on January 15, the Mets will have $6.2 million at their disposal . Although Steve Cohen's affinity for spending won't help right away, it could be attractive to Sasaki down the road. "It also helps that Steve Cohen is the richest owner in baseball," wrote Kline. "That won't do much for Sasaki's wallet in the immediate future, but it increases the odds that New York will pay up when the time for an extension arrives." More MLB: Mets predicted to sign 4-time All-Star to blockbuster $170 million deal