Trump 'Border Czar' Threatens States Not Willing To 'Cooperate' On Deportations
Hogs Rallying with 20-Year Low in Pork Stocks
West Ham surprise Newcastle with 2-0 away win7 Steps to Help Keep Your Small Business Cyber Safe This Holiday Season
Bucks, Heat pointing in right direction entering NBA Cup clashVANCOUVER — A family of killer whales has made a rare trip into waters off downtown Vancouver for what an expert says was likely a “grocery shopping” hunt for harbour seals. Video shared on social media by False Creek Ferries shows the whales cruising past highrise towers at the entrance to False Creek on Sunday. Andrew Trites, director of the University of British Columbia’s marine mammal research unit, has identified the whales as a family group of transient orcas consisting of a mother and her three offspring. He says it’s the first time the 26-year-old mother, known as T35A, has shown up in downtown Vancouver with her children aged six, 11 and 14. Trites says the well documented family has previously been seen by marine researchers from Alaska to the Strait of Juan de Fuca south of Vancouver Island. He attributes the pod’s surprising downtown appearance to seals also changing their habits as they hide from orcas, forcing killer whales to hunt in backwater areas like False Creek. Trites says the video shows the whales moving quietly like “ghosts” to avoid alerting their prey. Killer whales have previously been spotted in False Creek, including in 2019, and in 2010 a grey whale swam all the way to the end of the inlet, near Science World. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 25, 2024. Nono Shen, The Canadian Press
A WIFE revealed how the truth about her husband's infidelity was even worse than she had expected. The woman noticed love bites on her partner's chest that she hadn't given him, and was shocked when she found out who did. In her Reddit post , the unnamed user detailed the events that led up to the shocking revelation. She described the time since she learned about her husband's disgusting behaviour as "pure hell." The poster explained that she and her husband had been together for a total of eight years, and married for five. One day, while she was visiting her sick mother, the woman left her husband at home. She pointed out that the timing of the visit lined up well as her husband was planning to celebrate his brother's birthday while she was away. "I wished them a happy time and hoped they'd have fun," she said, adding that she "didn't think much of it." However, she decided to come back a day earlier than she had originally planned, hoping to surprise her husband. "I entered our house, and I heard noises, sex noises," the Reddit user wrote. "I kind of brushed it off, thinking it was just him pleasuring himself and watching porn." However, 20 to 30 minutes later he husband came downstairs and went "white as a ghost" at the sight of her. "He stares at me, stammers, and looks guilty," the woman recalled. "Not two minutes later his brother comes downstairs, and he has a hickey on his neck. "He greets me stiffly [and] says that he's got to run back home to his girlfriend." The poster noticed that her husband and his brother acted odd, not even saying goodbye. When she confronted him about the strange interaction, she described his reaction as "very evasive." Private Investigator Aaron Bond from BondRees revealed four warning signs your partner might be cheating. They start to take their phone everywhere with them In close relationships, it's normal to know each other's passwords and use each other's phones, if their phone habits change then they may be hiding something. Aaron says: "If your partner starts changing their passwords, starts taking their phone everywhere with them, even around the house or they become defensive when you ask to use their phone it could be a sign of them not being faithful." "You should also look at how they place their phone down when not in use. If they face the phone with the screen facing down, then they could be hiding something." They start telling you less about their day When partners cheat they can start to avoid you, this could be down to them feeling guilty or because it makes it easier for them to lie to you. "If you feel like your partner has suddenly begun to avoid you and they don't want to do things with you any more or they stop telling you about their day then this is another red flag." "Partners often avoid their spouses or tell them less about their day because cheating can be tough, remembering all of your lies is impossible and it's an easy way to get caught out," says Aaron. Their libido changes Your partner's libido can change for a range of reasons so it may not be a sure sign of cheating but it can be a red flag according to Aaron. Aaron says: "Cheaters often have less sex at home because they are cheating, but on occasions, they may also have more sex at home, this is because they feel guilty and use this increase in sex to hide their cheating. You may also find that your partner will start to introduce new things into your sex life that weren't there before." They become negative towards you Cheaters know that cheating is wrong and to them, it will feel good, this can cause tension and anxiety within themselves which they will need to justify. "To get rid of the tension they feel inside they will try to convince themselves that you are the problem and they will become critical of you out of nowhere. Maybe you haven't walked the dog that day, put the dishes away or read a book to your children before bedtime. A small problem like this can now feel like a big deal and if you experience this your partner could be cheating," warns Aaron. Her husband said that he and his brother had an argument but she continued to press him for details. "He finally relents, saying that Marcus cheated on his girlfriend and that the woman he cheated with escaped via window when they heard my car," she said. The woman said she was still suspicious but also felt concerned about Marcus' girlfriend, who was a good friend of hers. She also shared her confusion as to why Marcus, who lives alone, was inviting a woman over to their house. The woman then noticed that her husband was beginning to act "very quiet, reserved, and nervous." "When my husband took a shower, I went after him to wash my face and noticed that he too had hickeys on his chest that he tried to cover up when he saw me," she said. "I feel sick to my stomach, and decided to go through his phone." However, the messages that she discovered on her partner's phone were far worse than any affair she could've imagined. "I am still reading the conversations between him and his brother when my husband comes from shower," she said. "The conversations are explicit, the reality hit me like a ton of bricks." Her husband tried to explain away the flirty messages as "just joking between brothers." However, that night her husband broke down and revealed "everything" to her. "He has a on-off relationship with his brother, they started having sex over ten years ago," she explained. The woman shared his suspicions that her estranged in-laws had disowned their sons over their inappropriate relationship. "I haven't slept since the night and I don't know what to do, I can't look at my husband, and I don't know if I should tell Marcus' girlfriend about all this," she said.
A blockbuster clash awaits fans at the Allianz Arena as Bayern Munich take on Paris Saint-Germain (PSG) in the UEFA Champions League 2024-25 on Wednesday, November 27. The Bayern Munich vs PSG match is set to start at 1:30 AM IST (Indian Standard Time). The UEFA Champions League 2024-25 has the Sony Sports Network as its official broadcast partner in India. Fans seeking to watch Bayern Munich vs PSG live telecast can do so on the Sony Sports Ten 2 (English commentary) and Sony Sports Ten 3 (Hindi commentary) TV channels. SonyLIV will provide live streaming of the Bayern Munich vs PSG UCL 2024-25 match in case of fans looking for online viewing options. However, fans will need a subscription. Vinicius Jr Suffers Hamstring Injury, Rules Star Player Out Of Real Madrid vs Liverpool UEFA Champions League 2024-25 Match . The #ChampionsLeague returns with blockbuster clashes 🍿 🤩 Which team will you be cheering on? 🥳 #SonySportsNetwork #UCL pic.twitter.com/hSy0mPPZHu — Sony Sports Network (@SonySportsNetwk) November 26, 2024 (SocialLY brings you all the latest breaking news, viral trends and information from social media world, including Twitter, Instagram and Youtube. The above post is embeded directly from the user's social media account and LatestLY Staff may not have modified or edited the content body. The views and facts appearing in the social media post do not reflect the opinions of LatestLY, also LatestLY does not assume any responsibility or liability for the same.)Aurora's self-driving truck tech boosts Bozeman job marketReilly scores 18 as Delaware downs Rider 72-66Rosen Law Firm Announces Investigation of Breaches of Fiduciary Duties by the Directors and Officers of Southwest Airlines Co. - LUV
Digital classroom e-Kaksha goes liveSave Up To 50% On GoSun’s Portable Solar-Powered Appliances (Black Friday Sale)
Plan to Remove Controversial Southeast San Diego Zoning Footnote Moves to CouncilDundee United are set to be boosted by the return of Louis Moult – the club’s “most natural finisher” – for Saturday’s testing trip to face Rangers. Moult, 31, has been absent since suffering a knock to the knee against Kilmarnock on September 28. The severity of the injury proved to be far worse than initially feared but, as reported by on Tuesday, the experienced frontman has been back in And boss Jim Goodwin has confirmed that Moult is set to be in contention for the clash at Ibrox, with the ex-Motherwell hero desperate to feature – even if that means playing through the pain barrier. “Moulty was unlucky,” reflected Goodwin. “After scoring a couple of goals, hitting form and getting his place in the team – for that (injury) to happen at Rugby Park was a major disappointment for him. “But he is back now. “There is still a little bit of discomfort, but his injury is different from the hamstring injuries to (Kristijan) Trapanovski and (Ross) Graham. “Moulty’s is more of an impact thing, so it’s more about whether you can play through the pain – and Moulty wants to do that.” Given he has been sidelined for close to two months, it would be a major shock to see Moult asked to produce anything more than a second half cameo. But given his pedigree and Goodwin reckons that could still be valuable if United are still in the game going into the final stages. “He is probably the most at the club,” continued Goodwin. “I see that every day in training. “Opportunities in front of goal might be limited on Saturday. . So, having someone like Louis available in the latter stages of the game could be important. “Hopefully, he’ll play a big part.” The game will come too soon for hamstring strain victims Kristijan Trapanovski and Ross Graham, with Goodwin adding: “Trapanovski came back from the muscle injury, and it happened again at Easter Road. “We don’t want a repeat of that with Ross Graham. We want everyone to be pain free when they come back – and be back for a long time.” Captain Ross Docherty suffered a slight setback as he seeks to reach peak fitness following a calf issue but is slated to take part in training on Friday. Goodwin is “hopeful” the midfielder will be in the squad against the Light Blues.JERUSALEM (AP) — Israel’s attorney general has ordered police to open an investigation into Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s wife on suspicion of harassing political opponents and witnesses in the Israeli leader’s corruption trial. The Israeli Justice Ministry made the announcement in a terse message late Thursday, saying the investigation would focus on the findings of a recent report by the “Uvda” investigative program into Sara Netanyahu. The program uncovered a trove of WhatsApp messages in which Mrs. Netanyahu appears to instruct a former aid to organize protests against political opponents and to intimidate Hadas Klein, a key witness in the trial. The announcement did not mention Mrs. Netanyahu by name, and the Justice Ministry declined further comment. But in a video released earlier Thursday, Netanyahu listed what he said were the many kind and charitable acts by his wife and blasted the Uvda report as “lies.” It was the latest in a long line of legal troubles for the Netanyahus — highlighted by the prime minister’s ongoing corruption trial . Netanyahu is charged with fraud, breach of trust and accepting bribes in a series of cases alleging he exchanged favors with powerful media moguls and wealthy associates. Netanyahu denies the charges and says he is the victim of a “witch hunt” by overzealous prosecutors, police and the media. The Associated Press
Trump’s critics fear he will use IRS to get retribution
US to transform white elephant destroyers by fitting hypersonic weaponsALEXANDRIA, Va. (AP) — Google, already facing a possible breakup of the company over its ubiquitous search engine , is fighting to beat back another attack by the U.S. Department of Justice alleging monopolistic conduct, this time over technology that puts online advertising in front of consumers. The Justice Department and Google made closing arguments Monday in a trial alleging Google's advertising technology constitutes an illegal monopoly. U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema in Alexandria, Virginia, will decide the case and is expected to issue a written ruling by the end of the year. If Brinkema finds Google has engaged in illegal, monopolistic conduct, she will then hold further hearings to explore what remedies should be imposed. The Justice Department, along with a coalition of states, has already said it believes Google should be forced to sell off parts of its ad tech business, which generates tens of billions of dollars annually for the Mountain View, California-based company. After roughly a month of trial testimony earlier this year, the arguments in the case remain the same. During three hours of arguments Monday, Brinkema, who sometimes tips her hand during legal arguments, did little to indicate how she might rule. She did, though, question the applicability of a key antitrust case Google cites in its defense. The Justice Department contends Google built and maintained a monopoly in “open-web display advertising,” essentially the rectangular ads that appear on the top and right-hand side of the page when one browses websites. Google dominates all facets of the market. A technology called DoubleClick is used pervasively by news sites and other online publishers, while Google Ads maintains a cache of advertisers large and small looking to place their ads on the right webpage in front of the right consumer. In between is another Google product, AdExchange, that conducts nearly instantaneous auctions matching advertisers to publishers. In court papers, Justice Department lawyers say Google “is more concerned with acquiring and preserving its trifecta of monopolies than serving its own publisher and advertiser customers or winning on the merits.” As a result, content providers and news organizations have never been able to generate the online revenue they should due to Google’s excessive fees for brokering transactions between advertisers and publishers, the government says. Google argues the government's case improperly focuses on a narrow niche of online advertising. If one looks more broadly at online advertising to include social media, streaming TV services, and app-based advertising, Google says it controls as little as 10% of the market, a share that is dwindling as it faces increased and evolving competition. Google alleges in court papers that the government’s lawsuit “boil(s) down to the persistent complaints of a handful of Google’s rivals and several mammoth publishers.” Google also says it has invested billions in technology that facilitates the efficient match of advertisers to interested consumers and it should not be forced to share its technology and success with competitors. “Requiring a company to do further engineering work to make its technology and customers accessible by all of its competitors on their preferred terms has never been compelled by U.S. antitrust law,” the company wrote. Brinkema, during Monday's arguments, also sought clarity on Google’s market share, a number the two sides dispute, depending on how broadly the market is defined. Historically, courts have been unwilling to declare an illegal monopoly in markets in which a company holds less than a 70% market share. Google says that when online display advertising is viewed as a whole, it holds only a 10% market share, and dwindling. The Justice Department contends, though, that when focusing on open-web display advertising, Google controls 91% of the market for publisher ad servers and 87% of the market for advertiser ad networks. Google says that the “open web display advertising” market is gerrymandered by the Justice Department to make Google look bad, and that nobody in the industry looks at that category of ads without considering the ability of advertisers to switch to other forms of advertising, like in mobile apps. The Justice Department also contends that the public is harmed by the excessive rates Google charges to facilitate ad purchases, saying the company takes 36 cents on the dollar when it facilitates the transaction end to end. Google says its “take rate” has dropped to 31% and continues to decrease, and it says that rate is lower than that of its competitors. “When you have an integrated system, one of the benefits is lower prices," Google lawyer Karen Dunn said Monday. The Virginia case is separate from an ongoing lawsuit brought against Google in the District of Columbia over its namesake search engine. In that case, the judge determined it constitutes an illegal monopoly but has not decided what remedy to impose. The Justice Department said last week it will seek to force Google to sell its Chrome web browser , among a host of other penalties. Google has said the department's request is overkill and unhinged from legitimate regulation. In Monday's arguments, Justice Department lawyer Aaron Teitelbaum cited the search engine case when he highlighted an email from a Google executive, David Rosenblatt, who said in a 2009 email that Google’s goal was to “do to display what Google did to search," which Teitelbaum said showed the company's intent to achieve market dominance. “Google did not achieve its trifecta of monopolies by accident,” Teitelbaum said.