Labour leader holds exploratory coalition talks with Fianna Fail and Fine Gael
In April 2024, a young Muslim boy—a teenager—struggling with mental health challenges, attacked a priest. They labeled him a terrorist within hours, denied him bail. Yet just before this, a similar attack in Bondi by a non-Muslim grown man wasn’t labeled terrorism because they deemed the attacker’s mental health a valid excuse. Where was the justice then? And just days ago, a woman with a history of Islamophobic and anti-Palestinian hatred allegedly drove her car straight at Imam Wesam Charkawi in an apparent attempt on his life. What did the system do? Did it call her a terrorist? Did it deny her bail? No. They charged her with intimidation and set her free on bail. The same system that locks away Muslim youth for life under terrorism laws gave her a slap on the wrist. When a synagogue is attacked, they launch a national taskforce overnight to address terror threats. Yet for decades, Australian mosques have been burned to the ground , shot at , and desecrated ; Muslims have been stabbed and assaulted in the streets, and not even a whisper of a hate crime, let alone terrorism. Senior journalist Laura Tingle writes , it is also worth noting the very different treatment by our politicians of Muslim communities subject to very similar attacks over the past 10 years by our politicians. A 2021 study of 75 mosques across Australia by Charles Sturt University found that, over half (58.2 per cent) of participating mosques, or worshippers at them, had experienced targeted violence between 2014 and 2019. The political outrage seemed much more muted, to say the least. In over two decades, every person (bar one) convicted of terrorist act offences in Australia, including conspiracy, has been Muslim. Australia isn’t alone. Canada, which also imported the UK concept of “religiously motivated terrorism” two decades ago have avoided prosecuting racist nationalists with terrorism laws as one study showed. Those attacking our mosques say that it is because we are terrorists, but terrorism laws, and how they are used, are what characterise us that way . For over a decade, Scanlon surveys have repeatedly shown that Muslims are the “most disliked” and “least liked” minority in Australia. Yet, our political leaders continue to overlook these persistent and exceptional findings, silently implying that this is ‘to be expected’. Despite this, they manage to keep their hands clean of any visible blame. “It would be hard to change now that we have effectively been telling everyone your religion causes terrorism,” admitted one senior official after I asked him what would block the government from amending the law. This might be true but the real reason in my view is far more sinister. The terrorism laws in this country are not about justice—they are tools of foreign policy. They serve the interests of the US government and their allies, used to soften criticism and justify the billions poured into war machines, weapons companies, and alliances like AUKUS. They demand public support for genocide abroad and systemic oppression at home. AUKUS ministerial meeting, August 2024. The message is clear: Muslims are to be demonised, criminalised, and excluded from the protections offered to others. Vulnerable Muslim youth—children with mental health issues or disabilities—may be thrown into prisons for life under these laws. Meanwhile, offenders from other backgrounds are given leniency, compassion, and a second chance. This system is not broken. It is functioning exactly as it was designed to—protecting corporate interests, and reinforcing the colonial mindset that some lives matter more than others. It doesn’t just attack Muslims; it attacks the very soul of what it means to live in a just and equal society. If Australia wants to claim it is a land of fairness and multiculturalism, then the legal system must be stripped of its hypocrisy. Terrorism laws must be reviewed, reformed, and applied equally. The distinction from hate crime needs to be clarified. Vulnerabilities like youth, mental illness and disability need to be uniformly treated – whether terrorism or not. Anything less is not justice—it is oppression. And as long as this system continues to treat Muslims as second-class citizens, we must call it what it is: a betrayal of the very multicultural values it pretends to uphold.
Michigan wide receiver Tyler Morris , who started throughout the season and led Wolverines wideouts in receiving, is set to enter the transfer portal, he announced on social media Tuesday. Morris, a junior from Illinois, finished second on the team with 248 receiving yards behind tight end Colston Loveland. He tied for second on the squad with 23 receptions, matching Semaj Morgan. The 5-11, 185-pound Morris had 13 receptions for 197 yards in 2023, including a 38-yard touchdown in the CFP semifinal against Alabama at the Rose Bowl. He started four games last season after appearing in eight as a true freshman in 2022, when he caught three passes for 25 yards. Editor's Picks Big upsets! Buzzer-beaters! A hook-and-ladder!! The 20 best games of Rivalry Week 2d Bill Connelly ESPN rated Morris as the No. 180 overall recruit in the 2022 class. Morris' expected entry into the portal was first reported by 247 Sports. Michigan, which upset No. 2 Ohio State on Saturday to finish the regular season at 7-5, awaits a bowl assignment and an opponent this weekend.None
Murders, fake nurse, fraud and Chinese documents case occupy B.C. courts in 2024
Consideration given to recruiting 50% women to newly formed PSNI, records showNew look Mitchell girls basketball to rely on teamwork, athleticism on the floor
Prudential Financial (NYSE:PRU) Price Target Raised to $133.00
US Steel shares drop after Biden plans to block Nippon Steel deal - BloombergTikToker teaching science hopes short-form video will become part of curriculumTranscript: Aditya Bhave on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan," Dec. 29. 2024
President-elect Donald Trump “should not be threatening his political opponents with jail time,” Sen. Adam Schiff — one of those being threatened — said Tuesday. During an interview with NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Trump said Sunday that members of the special House committee that investigated the January 6, 2021 Capitol insurrection should go to jail. He said the committee destroyed its records, which Vice Chair Liz Cheney said is a “ridiculous and false” charge. But in fact, Trump said, “Cheney was behind it. And so is Bennie Thompson and everybody on that committee,” he said. “For what they did, honestly, they should go to jail.” Trump told “Meet the Press” moderator Kristen Welker he would not direct his FBI director or attorney general to send them to jail. “Not at all,” he said, but added, ‘They’ll have to look at that.” Schiff, then a Los Angeles-area congressman, was a member of the committee. Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., was chairman and former Rep. Cheney, R-Wy., was vice chairman. The committee had two Republicans and seven Democrats, and it gained widespread publicity as it held hearings and revealed details about the involvement of Trump and his allies in their efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. It issued its final report two years ago. Schiff, sworn in as California’s junior U.S. senator Monday afternoon, was appearing at a news conference Tuesday with Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., who was introducing him. They were asked about Trump’s threats . Schumer was quick to defend Schiff. “Look, bottom line is we all know Sen. Schiff did a very good job on the hearings. He broke no laws whatsoever. The truth stands for itself,” Schumer said. Schiff weighed in, saying of Trump’s comments: “That’s not the kind of talk we should hear from the president in a democracy nor do I think that a pardon is necessary for members of the Jan. 6 committee.” The White House has been considering preemptive pardons for some who could be subject to Trump administration investigations. Schiff has said repeatedly he’s not interested in a pardon. He reiterated he was “proud of the work we did on that committee. It was a fundamental oversight obligation, to investigate the first attempt to interfere with the peaceful transfer of power in our history.” This story was originally published December 10, 2024, 12:57 PM.
NoneLabour leader holds exploratory coalition talks with Fianna Fail and Fine GaelInside N.J.’s Mosaic: SZA’s new songs and tour dates, Sophia DeTorres tribute, and comfort food delights
Washington Commanders' offense busts out thanks to its old friend, the running gameAre Prince William and Kate Middleton's children George, Charlotte and Louis allowed to keep gifts handed to them by well-wishers on Christmas Day?