Ripple’s XRP Empowers Advanced AI Solutions on Atua AI (TUA)’s Enterprise PlatformAn online spat between factions of Donald Trump's supporters over immigration and the tech industry has thrown internal divisions in his political movement into public display, previewing the fissures and contradictory views his coalition could bring to the White House. The rift laid bare the tensions between the newest flank of Trump's movement — wealthy members of the tech world including billionaire Elon Musk and fellow entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy and their call for more highly skilled workers in their industry — and people in Trump's Make America Great Again base who championed his hardline immigration policies. The debate touched off this week when Laura Loomer, a right-wing provocateur with a history of racist and conspiratorial comments, criticized Trump’s selection of Sriram Krishnan as an adviser on artificial intelligence policy in his coming administration. Krishnan favors the ability to bring more skilled immigrants into the U.S. Loomer declared the stance to be “not America First policy” and said the tech executives who have aligned themselves with Trump were doing so to enrich themselves. Much of the debate played out on the social media network X, which Musk owns. Loomer's comments sparked a back-and-forth with venture capitalist and former PayPal executive David Sacks, whom Trump has tapped to be the “White House A.I. & Crypto Czar." Musk and Ramaswamy, whom Trump has tasked with finding ways to cut the federal government, weighed in, defending the tech industry's need to bring in foreign workers. It bloomed into a larger debate with more figures from the hard-right weighing in about the need to hire U.S. workers, whether values in American culture can produce the best engineers, free speech on the internet, the newfound influence tech figures have in Trump's world and what his political movement stands for. Trump has not yet weighed in on the rift. His presidential transition team did not respond to questions about positions on visas for highly skilled workers or the debate between his supporters online. Instead, his team instead sent a link to a post on X by longtime adviser and immigration hard-liner Stephen Miller that was a transcript of a speech Trump gave in 2020 at Mount Rushmore in which he praised figures and moments from American history. Musk, the world's richest man who has grown remarkably close to the president-elect, was a central figure in the debate, not only for his stature in Trump's movement but his stance on the tech industry's hiring of foreign workers. Technology companies say H-1B visas for skilled workers, used by software engineers and others in the tech industry, are critical for hard-to-fill positions. But critics have said they undercut U.S. citizens who could take those jobs. Some on the right have called for the program to be eliminated, not expanded. Born in South Africa, Musk was once on an a H-1B visa himself and defended the industry's need to bring in foreign workers. “There is a permanent shortage of excellent engineering talent," he said in a post. “It is the fundamental limiting factor in Silicon Valley.” Trump's own positions over the years have reflected the divide in his movement. His tough immigration policies, including his pledge for a mass deportation, were central to his winning presidential campaign. He has focused on immigrants who come into the U.S. illegally but he has also sought curbs on legal immigration, including family-based visas. As a presidential candidate in 2016, Trump called the H-1B visa program “very bad” and “unfair” for U.S. workers. After he became president, Trump in 2017 issued a “Buy American and Hire American” executive order, which directed Cabinet members to suggest changes to ensure H-1B visas were awarded to the highest-paid or most-skilled applicants to protect American workers. Trump's businesses, however, have hired foreign workers, including waiters and cooks at his Mar-a-Lago club, and his social media company behind his Truth Social app has used the the H-1B program for highly skilled workers. During his 2024 campaign for president, as he made immigration his signature issue, Trump said immigrants in the country illegally are “poisoning the blood of our country" and promised to carry out the largest deportation operation in U.S. history. But in a sharp departure from his usual alarmist message around immigration generally, Trump told a podcast this year that he wants to give automatic green cards to foreign students who graduate from U.S. colleges. “I think you should get automatically, as part of your diploma, a green card to be able to stay in this country," he told the “All-In" podcast with people from the venture capital and technology world. Those comments came on the cusp of Trump's budding alliance with tech industry figures, but he did not make the idea a regular part of his campaign message or detail any plans to pursue such changes.
With 2024 almost in the books, Rob Kenedi (the Ghost of Tech Future) and I have peered deep into our crystal balls to offer tech predictions and prognostication for 2025. Consider this a companion piece to our twice-recorded, first-in-your-hearts , which provides a historical grounding allowing us to fly free with our tech predictions. “Part of my prediction for 2025 is embracing or acknowledging that chaos reigns.” Or at least it did for Rob. My longtime Brother In Pod brought the absolute on this episode, starting with a clear-headed prediction of where AI companies might focus their attention next, harkening back to the mobile app revolution one tech generation prior. He then dropped a nuclear acquisition prediction that scratched the part of my brain dedicated to following the NBA trade deadline so hard that we were forced to . As for The BetaKit Podcast’s other co-host? Well, I did my best. Anyone who has consumed this podcast before knows that I have a hard time moving off certain topics, so it will come as no surprise to them that my predictions focus on tech regulation and Canada’s innovation policy. On the latter prediction, I must remind everyone that this episode was recorded the Friday before the Fall Economic Statement, and thus the Friday before as Finance Minister. As such, my final prediction might seem ... insane in retrospect. Here’s the thing: I thought long and hard about modifying or omitting this prediction prior to publication, but ultimately decided to leave it as is. If you’re not willing to make a fool of yourself for the benefit of your listeners, you shouldn’t be podcasting. That said, over the holidays while supping some ‘nog, I caught up on the between US tech leaders and the people they helped elect. It seems like the potential for my prediction to shoot the moon remains, and isn’t a little hope all anyone can ask for at the start of a new year? 2025 is coming. Embrace chaos. As he considers a US $250 million acquisition offer for his data analytics company, Pellucid, CEO Tom Oliver becomes the target of a nefarious plot. A suspenseful journey through Toronto, Caledon, Georgian Bay, and the US, follows the twists and turns of M&A, disappearing company funds, and CEO safety. If you enjoyed and , this book is for you. .
SANTA CLARA, Calif. — An MRI exam on Brock Purdy’s throwing shoulder has the 49ers “feeling good,” but his status is still “tenuous” to play in Sunday’s game at Green Bay, according to general manager John Lynch. Injured at an undetermined point in Sunday’s 20-17 loss to the Seattle Seahawks, Purdy did not throw at Wednesday’s practice and then did so only briefly Thursday before retreating to rehab his shoulder “per the plan,” Lynch said on KNBR 680-AM. If Purdy misses his first start due to injury since seizing the job nearly two years ago, Brandon Allen will open for the 49ers (5-5) against the Packers (7-3) at Lambeau Field, with Josh Dobbs the No. 2 quarterback, Lynch confirmed. “We’ve done that (MRI) and feel good about where it’s at from that standpoint. But you still have to go out and be able to operate,” Lynch said. “We’re kind of figuring all that out. Brock is going to show up today, we’ll see where he can go as far as practice and we’ll make some decisions accordingly.” Coach Kyle Shanahan will address the media with the official status report after Friday's practice before the 49ers fly to Wisconsin for the first of two consecutive road games, with a trip to Buffalo awaiting next weekend. Purdy’s usual press conference after Thursday’s practice was postponed to Friday, with no assurance whether he or Allen would be speaking to the media as the projected starting quarterback. How and when Purdy got hurt remains a mystery, Lynch said. “It was somewhere during that Seattle game and I’m not sure Brock knows,” Lynch added. “He fought through it through the course of the game. I did see him during the course of the game, anytime there was a pause, he kept throwing. At that point, you’re feeling something but he was so focused on trying to win. “We had a plan to try to quiet it down,” Lynch said. “Wednesday, didn’t do any throwing. Thursday, started to do something throwing then went inside and did some rehab, per the plan. We’ll see where he’s at today. Hopefully he makes progress and we can have a shot at this weekend. “We’ll see. It is tenuous.” Also circumspect are the availabilities of defensive end Nick Bosa (obliques, hips) and left tackle Trent Williams (ankle). ©2024 MediaNews Group, Inc. Visit at mercurynews.com . Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Abbotsford Regional Hospital's cardiac clinic has a new piece of equipment, thanks to a donation from Pacific Open Heart Association. The cardiac scale enables medical professionals to obtain crucial metrics related to cardiac perfusion, such as stroke volume and pulse rate variability. The $2,500 donation was made through the Fraser Valley Health Care Foundation (FVHCF). Executive director Elizabeth Harris said the enhanced technology will contribute to more accurate assessments and, ultimately, improve patient outcomes. “Together, we are creating a community where healing hearts is at the forefront of everything we do and we are thankful for the generosity of the Pacific Open Heart Association," she said. The Pacific Open Heart Association aims to bolster health-care facilities by providing essential materials that enhance patient care and comfort. For more information on how to support hospitals in the Fraser Valley, contact Lakhbir.Jassal@fraserhealth.ca or visit fvhcf.ca.Did Bibi Get Away with it?
To play Maria Callas, Angelina Jolie had to learn how to breathe againDSWD explains handling cases of children in conflict with law
Ohio State AD: Ryan Day ‘absolutely’ back in 2025Pete Hegseth, President-elect Donald Trump’s choice to be defense secretary, is joined by his wife Jennifer Rauchet as he speaks with reporters after meeting with Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, on Capitol Hill, Wednesday, Dec. 11, 2024, in Washington. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein) Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, speaks with reporters after meeting with Pete Hegseth, President-elect Donald Trump’s choice to be defense secretary, on Capitol Hill, Wednesday, Dec. 11, 2024, in Washington. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein) Pete Hegseth, President-elect Donald Trump’s choice to be defense secretary, arrives for a meeting with Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., on Capitol Hill, Wednesday, Dec. 11, 2024, in Washington. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein) Pete Hegseth, President-elect Donald Trump’s choice to be defense secretary, is joined by his wife Jennifer Rauchet as he speaks with reporters after meeting with Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, on Capitol Hill, Wednesday, Dec. 11, 2024, in Washington. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein) By MARY CLARE JALONICK and MATT BROWN WASHINGTON (AP) — Pete Hegseth, President-elect Donald Trump’s nominee to lead the Defense Department, said he had a “wonderful conversation” with Maine Sen. Susan Collins on Wednesday as he pushed to win enough votes for confirmation. He said he will not back down after allegations of excessive drinking and sexual misconduct. Related Articles National Politics | Donald Trump will ring the New York Stock Exchange bell. It’ll be a first for him National Politics | The Trump and Biden teams insist they’re working hand in glove on foreign crises National Politics | ‘You don’t know what’s next.’ International students scramble ahead of Trump inauguration National Politics | Trump is threatening to raise tariffs again. Here’s how China plans to fight back National Politics | Trump won’t be able to save the struggling US beef industry Collins said after the hourlong meeting that she questioned Hegseth about the allegations amid reports of drinking and the revelation that he made a settlement payment after being accused of a sexual assault that he denies. She said she had a “good, substantive” discussion with Hegseth and “covered a wide range of topics,” including sexual assault in the military, Ukraine and NATO. But she said she would wait until a hearing, and notably a background check, to make a decision. “I asked virtually every question under the sun,” Collins told reporters as she left her office after the meeting. “I pressed him both on his position on military issues as well as the allegations against him, so I don’t think there was anything that we did not cover.” The meeting with Collins was closely watched as she is seen as more likely than most of her Republican Senate colleagues to vote against some of Trump’s Cabinet picks. She and Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski, a fellow moderate Republican, did not shy from opposing Trump in his first term when they wanted to do so and sometimes supported President Joe Biden’s nominees for the judicial and executive branches. And Hegseth, an infantry combat veteran and former “Fox & Friends” weekend host, is working to gain as many votes as he can as some senators have expressed concerns about his personal history and lack of management experience. “I’m certainly not going to assume anything about where the senator stands,” Hegseth said as he left Collins’ office. “This is a process that we respect and appreciate. And we hope, in time, overall, when we get through that committee and to the floor that we can earn her support.” Hegseth met with Murkowski on Tuesday. He has also been meeting repeatedly with Iowa Sen. Joni Ernst, a military veteran who has said she is a survivor of sexual assault and has spent time in the Senate working on improving how attacks are reported and prosecuted within the ranks. On Monday, Ernst said after a meeting with him that he had committed to selecting a senior official to prioritize those goals. Republicans will have a 53-49 majority next year, meaning Trump cannot lose more than three votes on any of his nominees. It is so far unclear whether Hegseth will have enough support, but Trump has stepped up his pressure on senators in the last week. “Pete is a WINNER, and there is nothing that can be done to change that!!!” Trump posted on his social media platform last week.
Meta has donated $1 million to president-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration fund, . Zuckerberg’s team reportedly told Trump’s inaugural committee about Meta’s planned donation before Zuckerberg and Trump . Before the dinner, Zuckerberg showed off Meta’s Ray-Ban smart glasses and gifted a pair to Trump, according to the Journal. Zuckerberg’s advisers also met with incoming White House officials, including incoming White House chief of staff Susie Wiles. The donation marks a significant shift for Zuckerberg, who has until recently shied away from politics. Zuckerberg on his election victory. But he didn’t publicly endorse a candidate in 2020 — and as Meta spokespeople have repeatedly emphasized, he also didn’t endorse anyone in 2024, despite Trump’s claims that Zuckerberg called him to say there’s “no way” he could vote for a Democrat after the attempt on Trump’s life at a Pennsylvania rally. (Zuckerberg also ) Still, Zuckerberg has made increasingly unsubtle overtures to Trump, who has threatened the Facebook founder over the years. The dinner — and the donation — are signs that the notoriously rocky relationship between Zuckerberg and Trump is starting to soften. Trump has had it out for Zuckerberg since Facebook banned his account in the wake of the January 6th riots, and at one point due to Facebook’s alleged interference in the 2020 election. /
NoneDonald Trump has urged the U.S. Supreme Court to pause a federal TikTok law that would ban the popular social media app or force its sale, with the Republican U.S. president-elect arguing that he should have time after taking office to pursue a "political resolution" to the issue. TikTok and its owner ByteDance are fighting to keep the popular app online in the United States after Congress voted in April to ban it unless the app's Chinese parent company sells it by Jan. 19. They have sought to have the law struck down, and the Supreme Court has agreed to hear the case. But if the court does not rule in ByteDance's favor and no divestment occurs, the app could be effectively banned in the United States on Jan. 19, one day before Trump takes office. "This case presents an unprecedented, novel, and difficult tension between free-speech rights on one side, and foreign policy and national security concerns on the other," Trump said in a filing on Friday. "Such a stay would vitally grant President Trump the opportunity to pursue a political resolution that could obviate the Court's need to decide these constitutionally significant questions," the filing added. Free speech advocates separately told the Supreme Court on Friday that the U.S. law against Chinese-owned TikTok evokes the censorship regimes put in place by the United States' authoritarian enemies. Trump indicated earlier this week that he favored allowing TikTok to keep operating in the United States for at least a little while, saying he had received billions of views on the social media platform during his presidential campaign. The U.S. Justice Department has argued that Chinese control of TikTok poses a continuing threat to national security, a position supported by most U.S. lawmakers. TikTok says the Justice Department has misstated the social media app's ties to China, arguing that its content recommendation engine and user data are stored in the United States on cloud servers operated by Oracle Corp while content moderation decisions that affect U.S. users are made in the United States as well. (Reporting by Kanishka Singh; Editing by Alistair Bell)Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren forced to walk back wild comments on 'assassin' Luigi Mangione
Greetings CIPAWorld! I’m back with the latest scoop to lead you all into a fantastic Thanksgiving Holiday. The United States District Court for the Northern District of California has issued a significant ruling in Williams v. DDR Media, L.L.C. , No. 22-cv-03789-SI, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 211342 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 20, 2024) , granting summary judgment to defendants in a closely watched privacy case. The dispute began when Loretta Williams visited snappyrent2own.com on December 10, 2021, where her interactions were processed by TCPA Guardian, a software product developed by Jornaya to help companies comply with the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”). TCPA Guardian is specifically ‘designed to help companies comply with the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, which restricts how companies contact consumers using autodialing technology without prior consent.’ This critical detail helps explain why the hashing process is necessary and legitimate. In fact, this case was previously covered by the one and only Baroness located here . So, I’m excited to share this update. The case has evolved substantially since its initial filing. Williams originally filed suit against DDR Media and Jornaya, alleging violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (“CIPA”), Penal Code § 631(a) , Invasion of Privacy under the California Constitution, and California’s Unfair Competition Law. After several rounds of motions and amendments, Williams filed a Second Amended Complaint focusing specifically on her claim under Penal Code § 631(a) , part of CIPA. She alleged that TCPA Guardian captured her keystrokes, clicks, and other interactions, including her name, email address, and phone number, constituting wiretapping under CIPA. Williams alleged that TCPA Guardian captured her keystrokes, clicks, and personal information, including her name, email address, and phone number, constituting wiretapping under CIPA. CIPA Section 631(a) prohibits the unauthorized “reading,” “attempting to read,” or “learning” of the contents of communications while they are in transit. Here, the judicial analysis relied heavily on detailed testimony from Jornaya’s Chief Technology Officer, Manny Wald, regarding the technical functionality of TCPA Guardian. Let’s get technical for a minute for clarity. According to Wald, TCPA Guardian uses LeadiD Create, a JavaScript that generates a unique numerical reference for each website visit and collects basic data about the website itself, including consent disclosures and user interactions. This information is associated with the unique LeadiD. The hashing process creates a fixed-size output regardless of the input size, meaning the hash code from a single word would be the same length as one from an entire dictionary. As Wald explained, identical inputs always produce the same hash code, while even minor differences like ‘Main St.’ versus ‘Main Street’ create entirely different hashes. This verifies data matches without needing to read or understand the original content. Importantly, Wald explained that the collected data is immediately subjected to a one-way cryptographic hashing algorithm that transforms the input into a fixed-size alphanumeric string. This hashing process is automatic, irreversible, and occurs within milliseconds, with the original data being stored only temporarily in volatile memory before being overwritten. A crucial aspect of TCPA Guardian’s functionality is how it operates in the lead marketplace. Lead sellers operate websites offering information about products or services and collecting visitor information. When a lead buyer later purchases this information, they can use TCPA Guardian to verify that the data matches what was originally collected, particularly regarding consent to receive communications, without Jornaya ever accessing the original data. Whew, okay, now that we get the technical aspect out of the way, let’s dig into the Court’s analysis and reasoning. First, Judge Illston evaluated whether hashing constitutes “reading” or “learning” the contents of communications under CIPA. Because the statute does not define “reading,” the Court applied its ordinary meaning as outlined in DeGeorge v. U.S. Dist. Court , 219 F.3d 930, 936 (9th Cir. 2000) and the Oxford English Dictionary, which requires “understanding what is meant by the letters or signs.” The Court’s analysis was informed by Davis v. Facebook, Inc. ( In re Facebook Inc. Internet Tracking Litig. ), 956 F.3d 589, 598 (9th Cir. 2020) , which emphasized that CIPA was meant to protect historical privacy rights, and Javier v. Assur. IQ, L.L.C. , No. 21-16351, 2022 WL 1744107 (9th Cir. May 31, 2022) , which noted that Section 631 codified the common law tort of invasion of privacy. The Court found that TCPA Guardian’s hashing process involves no comprehension or interpretation of the original data and is, therefore, not “reading” under CIPA. This conclusion aligned with similar rulings, such as Gutierrez v. Converse Inc. , 2024 WL 3511648 (C.D. Cal. July 12, 2024) , where the Court granted summary judgment for a defendant when the third-party vendor’s encryption of chat messages did not involve substantive interpretation. The Court emphasized that hashing serves as a verification tool for data integrity rather than a method of accessing or understanding content. This critical distinction set TCPA Guardian apart from cases where vendors actively intercepted and analyzed user data. As a countering measure, Williams attempted to argue that the hashing process itself constitutes “reading,” likening it to translating a letter into Pig Latin. The Court dismissed this analogy, explaining that while human translation involves understanding the meaning of words, TCPA Guardian’s hashing process is purely algorithmic and lacks the capacity for comprehension . Expanding further, the Court further distinguished this case from D’Angelo v. Penny OpCo, LLC , 2023 WL 7006793 (S.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2023) , where third-party software actively analyzed communications to create live transcripts, and Valenzuela v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. , 686 F. Supp. 3d 969 (C.D. Cal. 2023) , where the vendor’s business model relied on intercepting data for mass analysis. Conversely, TCPA Guardian facilitates hashed comparisons between lead sellers and buyers without accessing or interpreting the original data. The Court also relied on California precedent emphasizing CIPA’s broad interpretation, including Ribas v. Clark , 38 Cal. 3d 355, 359 (1985) , highlighting the Legislature’s intent to safeguard privacy rights. However, it concluded that the automated hashing process lacked the human or machine effort to interpret or learn the contents of communications , distinguishing it from the conduct CIPA aims to regulate. With this in mind, the Court ultimately ruled that “Jornaya is more akin to a tape recorder vendor than an eavesdropper,” reinforcing its prior dismissal of Williams’ claims under the UCL and the California Constitution. As noted in our earlier blog, the Court found that Defendant’s use of hashed data was “benign” and posed no serious invasion of privacy. So what’s the key takeaway? Well, this is big for anyone involved in the telecommunications space and those using automated data processing tools. By clarifying that purely algorithmic processes without content interpretation fall outside CIPA’s reach, the Court has provided essential guidance for compliance in California. This is particularly significant for lead buyers, lead sellers, and the broader lead generation industry, where verifying consent and data integrity is crucial. Businesses that employ hashing technology can now operate with greater confidence, knowing that such safeguards do not constitute “reading” or “learning” under privacy laws. THIS IS HUGE. Wishing you all a Happy Thanksgiving to you and your loved ones. As always, Keep it legal, keep it smart, and stay ahead of the game. Talk soon!
Trump's FBI pick Kash Patel goes scorched earth on MSNBC guest in wild letter Kash Patel's lawyer sent a letter threatening legal action against Olivia Troye Sign up for the latest with DailyMail.com's U.S. politics newsletter By SARAH EWALL-WICE, SENIOR U.S. POLITICAL REPORTER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM IN WASHINGTON, DC Published: 22:47 GMT, 4 December 2024 | Updated: 22:52 GMT, 4 December 2024 e-mail 8 View comments The lawyer of Kash Patel, President-elect Donald Trump 's pick to lead the FBI , sent a letter to an MSNBC commentator threatening to take legal action unless she retracts her remarks about him on the network. Olivia Troye, who once served in the Trump administration before becoming a fierce critic of the president-elect, shared the letter by Patel's attorney on social media. 'Litigation will be filed against you if you fail to publicly retract defamatory statements you made about Mr. Patel on MSNBC on December 2, 2024,' the letter reads. It accuses her of making 'several false and defamatory statements' about Patel. During the MSNBC segment, Troye called Patel a 'delusional liar' and accused him of lying about intelligence. She accused him of 'making things up on operations' to the point where he was accused of putting 'the lives of Navy SEALs at risk in an operation when it came to Nigeria .' Troye also accused Patel of misinforming Vice President Mike Pence . President-elect Trump's pick for FBI director threatened legal action against Olivia Troye after she criticized him during an appearance on MSNBC She claimed she would have to double-check his work so she did not pass on misinformation to the vice president while working for him as a special adviser during the Trump administration. The letter from Patel's lawyer called her criticism of him a 'complete fabrication.' 'At no point did Mr. Patel ever lie about national intelligence, place Navy Seals at risk, or misinform the Vice President,' the letter reads. The letter accused her of not only having 'knowledge of the falsity of this smear' but doing so 'with the malicious intent of degrading his character and of cynical self-promotion.' The letter demanded she retract her remarks with a public statement on her X account within five days of receiving the letter. 'Unless this step is taken, Mr. Patel will take swift legal action to uphold his rights and reputation,' the letter stated. It also directed her to preserve documents related to Patel including emails, texts and other electronic messages, recordings, voice mails, drafts, notes communications, documents, data and electronically stored information. It asked for confirmation of receipt of the letter and intention to retract statements as well as confirmation she intends to retain documents and data. Olivia Troye called Patel a 'delusional liar' and accused him of lying about intelligence in Trump's first term during an appearance on MSNBC on December 2 But Troye decided to make the entire letter public on social media, positing it on X and the Bluesky social platform. ' This aligns with his threats against the media & political opponents, revealing how he might conduct himself if confirmed in the role, Troye wrote in her post. 'I stand by my statements—my priority remains the safety & security of the American people, she continued. 'I am not the only one who has expressed concerns about him. So why me? And so it begins,' she finished. Olivia Troye responded to threatened legal action by posting the letter and her response on social media The letter sent to Olivia Troye's lawyer from the law firm representing Trump's FBI pick Kash Patel threatening legal action Troye, who previously also served in the Department of Homeland Security during Trump's first term and the Defense Department during the Bush administration came out as a fierce critic of Trump after serving in his first administration. She was one of multiple former Trump officials to speak out against him during the 2024 campaign including from the state of the Democratic National Convention. Olivia Troye speaking at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago in August Troye with then-Vice President Mike Pence. she served as his homeland security and counterterrorism adviser Trump announced on Saturday that he intended to nominate Patel, a close ally and controversial pick, to be the next FBI director, cutting short the tenure of current FBI Director Christopher Wray. Patel served as chief of staff to the acting defense secretary during Trump's first term as well as on the National Security Council and as an adviser to the acting director of national intelligence. He is a 2020 election denier who has also been a vocal critic of the bureau he is being tapped to lead accusing the FBI of 'deep state' activities. Patel has also gone after the media claiming during a December 2023 podcast taping on Steve Bannon's show that they will 'come after the people in the media who lied about American citizens who helped Joe Biden rig presidential elections.' Patel would have to be confirmed by the Senate to become the next FBI director. In her appearance on MSNBC's The Reidout on Monday, Troye warned Patel is someone wh o 'openly has contempt for people in national security, for people especially at DOJ and the FBI.' She called it 'insane' if he becomes FBI director and said she fears for the law enforcement officers who will have to navigate working for him. Politics Share or comment on this article: Trump's FBI pick Kash Patel goes scorched earth on MSNBC guest in wild letter e-mail Add commentTrump asks Supreme Court to delay TikTok ban so he can weigh in after he takes office