Cover Five: With pressure rising, Matt Rhule delivers Nebraska a bowl bid in Year 2PHILADELPHIA (AP) — Jamal Mashburn Jr. scored 18 points as Temple beat Buffalo 91-71 on Sunday. Mashburn shot 6 for 10 (3 for 6 from 3-point range) and 3 of 4 from the free-throw line for the Owls (8-5). Zion Stanford scored 15 points while going 4 of 9 and 6 of 7 from the free-throw line. Quante Berry had 15 points and shot 7 of 8 from the field and 0 for 4 from the foul line. The Bulls (5-7) were led by Tyson Dunn, who posted 11 points and four assists. Anquan Boldin Jr. added 11 points and three steals for Buffalo. Noah Batchelor also had nine points and six rebounds. Temple took the lead with 5:38 remaining in the first half and never looked back. The score was 39-29 at halftime, with Shane Dezonie racking up seven points. Temple outscored Buffalo in the second half by 10 points, with Mashburn scoring a team-high 13 points after intermission. The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar .
Welcome to Medical Ethics Unpacked! In this episode of Medical Ethics Unpacked , hosts Dominic Sisti, PhD, and Steve Levine, MD, continue their deep dive into the controversial topic of medical aid in dying (MAID) and euthanasia for individuals with severe psychiatric conditions. Part 2 of a 2-part series, this episode shifts from foundational concepts to the intricate ethical considerations surrounding these practices, touching on autonomy, capacity, treatment equity, and societal implications. Sisti, an associate professor in the Department of Medical Ethics & Health Policy and the director of the Scattergood Program for the Applied Ethics of Behavioral Health Care at the University of Pennsylvania, begins by discussing the notion of parity between psychiatric and physical illnesses in evaluating eligibility for MAID, calling attention to recent research from Kious et al—who argues that mental illnesses should be given equal ethical consideration as physical conditions, though he acknowledges the challenges in assessing long-term trajectories for psychiatric disorders. For instance, conditions like borderline personality disorder may remit over time, but requiring patients to endure suffering for years in anticipation of potential improvement raises moral concerns. Levine, a psychiatrist and the senior vice president of Patient Access at Compass Pathways, builds on this by exploring how psychiatric illnesses often blur the line between mental and physical health, emphasizing that mental health conditions, like depression or anorexia nervosa, can have physical manifestations that further complicate prognosis and decision-making. The discussion highlights critical issues with capacity evaluations. Levine outlines the nuanced frameworks used to assess a patient’s ability to make decisions about MAID and stresses the dynamic nature of capacity, which can fluctuate with psychiatric symptoms. Both agree that insufficient or inconsistent evaluations, as seen in some jurisdictions permitting psychiatric euthanasia, risk undermining the ethical integrity of these practices. Sisti cites evidence from Belgium and the Netherlands, where "assertions" of capacity rather than thorough assessments have led to controversial cases, particularly among patients with mood or personality disorders. The gender disparity in psychiatric euthanasia, with women disproportionately represented, adds another layer of ethical complexity, raising questions about justice and societal biases. The conversation also examines whether patients should be required to attempt all available treatments, including experimental options, before pursuing MAID. While Sisti suggests this could prevent premature decisions, Levine cautions against infringing on autonomy, noting that some patients may validly reject certain treatments. They grapple with cases like anorexia nervosa, a psychiatric condition with high mortality rates, and whether its ego-syntonic nature—where patients often do not view their condition as a problem—impedes true capacity for MAID decisions. Finally, the hosts address societal implications. Sisti warns that expanding access to psychiatric euthanasia without addressing underlying structural issues, such as inadequate mental health care and social determinants like poverty and isolation, risks normalizing preventable suffering. Levine reflects on how offering MAID as an option might paradoxically provide hope for some patients but could also undermine their optimism for recovery. As they conclude, both Levine and Sisti emphasize the need for robust ethical frameworks, thorough capacity evaluations, and thoughtful policymaking to navigate this morally complex issue. They encourage listeners to engage with the growing body of bioethics literature and reflect on how these debates shape our understanding of autonomy, human suffering, and the value of life. Relevant studies and documentation mentioned in this episode: Doernberg, Samuel N., John R. Peteet, and Scott YH Kim. "Capacity evaluations of psychiatric patients requesting assisted death in the Netherlands." Psychosomatics 57, no. 6 (2016): 556-565. Kim, Scott YH, Raymond G. De Vries, and John R. Peteet. "Euthanasia and assisted suicide of patients with psychiatric disorders in the Netherlands 2011 to 2014." JAMA psychiatry73, no. 4 (2016): 362-368. Kious, Brent M., and Margaret Battin. "Physician aid-in-dying and suicide prevention in psychiatry: A moral crisis?." The American Journal of Bioethics 19, no. 10 (2019): 29-39. Nicolini, Marie E., Scott YH Kim, Madison E. Churchill, and Chris Gastmans. "Should euthanasia and assisted suicide for psychiatric disorders be permitted? A systematic review of reasons." Psychological medicine 50, no. 8 (2020): 1241-1256. Nicolini, Marie E., Chris Gastmans, and Scott YH Kim. "Psychiatric euthanasia, suicide and the role of gender." The British Journal of Psychiatry 220, no. 1 (2022): 10-13. Sisti, Dominic, J. John Mann, and Maria A. Oquendo. "Suicidal behaviour is pathological: implications for psychiatric euthanasia." Journal of Medical Ethics (2024). Relevant disclosures for Sisti include Lykos Therapeutics and Tactogen. Relevant disclosures for include Levine include Compass Pathways. Editor's Note: This podcast explores complex and sensitive topics, including medically assisted suicide and the ethics of euthanasia. The views and opinions expressed by the hosts and guests are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of HCPLive or MJH Life Sciences. This content is intended to encourage thoughtful discussion and does not constitute medical advice or endorsement of any particular position. Listeners are encouraged to approach these subjects with care and consult appropriate resources for further information.
Liverpool shines in Champions League, dumping Real Madrid down the table. Dortmund rises to 4th
Letter: Word of the Year - PolarizationFirst, the Russians, now this. Last month, a Russian judge fined Alphabet's ( GOOGL ) two undecillion rubles — say what ? — for restricting the country's state media channels on YouTube, which the search engine giant owns. Related: Analyst delivers startling Apple warning amid Google antitrust case The figure — a 2 with 34 zeros right behind it — is many times greater than the entire planet's GDP, which the International Monetary Fund pegs at about $110 trillion. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov admitted he "cannot even pronounce this number" but urged "Google management to pay attention." Google, by the way, is worth just over $2 trillion. While Russian officials have said the number is “filled with symbolism," the U.S. Department of Justice is playing for keeps. On Nov. 20, the DOJ said in a court filing that it wants Google to sell off its Chrome browser to level the competitive playing field for search engine rivals. A sale of Chrome “will permanently stop Google’s control of this critical search access point and allow rival search engines the ability to access the browser that for many users is a gateway to the internet,” the DOJ lawyers said in the filing. 🐂 Don’t miss the move: SIGN UP for TheStreet’s FREE Daily newsletter 🐻 The government also asked for a divestment of Google's Android mobile operating system or a contingent Android divestment based on the effectiveness of other conduct-based remedies. picture alliance/Getty Images Google exec blasts proposal as 'wildly overboard' In addition, the DOJ wants to stop Google from making multibillion-dollar deals to lock in its dominant search engine as the default option on Apple’s ( AAPL ) iPhone and other devices. Alphabet’s “Search & Other” segment generated $49.4 billion, accounting for 56% of the company's total revenue for the quarter. Related: Analysts overhaul Alphabet stock price targets as Google parent soars In August, a federal judge ruled that Google held a monopoly in the search market. The government filed its case in 2020, charging that Google controlled the general search market by creating strong barriers to entry and a feedback loop that sustained its dominance. Kent Walker, Google’s chief legal officer, wrote in a blog post that the "DOJ’s approach would result in unprecedented government overreach that would harm American consumers, developers, and small businesses — and jeopardize America’s global economic and technological leadership at precisely the moment it’s needed most." "DOJ’s wildly overbroad proposal goes miles beyond the Court’s decision," Walker said. "It would break a range of Google products — even beyond Search — that people love and find helpful in their everyday lives." Alphabet is spending billions on AI development and infrastructure as it rolls out its Gemini technology over the whole of its product suite. The DOJ also wants to stop Google from favoring its own services, such as YouTube and Gemini. Last month, the company posted stronger-than-expected third-quarter earnings and impressive gains in its cloud division. Alphabet shares fell about 6% in the days after the DOJ filed its motion. However, the company's stock, as of Nov. 22, is up 18% year-to-date, and it has risen nearly 21% from a year ago. The DOJ filing moved several investment firms to issue research notes about the implications of the government's proposal. Wells Fargo analyst Ken Gawrelski said the Department of Justice's proposed remedies in Google's search antitrust case is "close to worst-case scenario," according to The Fly. The Justice Department has made a "relatively dramatic ask," but the case is far from over, including a likely DOJ leadership change, Gawrelski said. DOJ plan is worst-case scenario for Alphabet Gawrelski said he views the DOJ's remedy filing as the likely worst-case scenario for Google and sees an opportunity for further negotiation in proposed remedies with the upcoming change in DOJ leadership. The analyst also said he sees "meaningful risk" to Google's competitive position due to the behavioral remedy proposal prohibiting the company from paying for search distribution. More Tech Stocks: The DOJ's structural remedy proposal of Chrome separation, if accepted by the judge, potentially puts at least 15% of Google search revenue at risk, Gawrelski contended. He kept an equal weight rating on Alphabet. JPMorgan analyst Doug Anmuth said the DOJs "very comprehensive set of remedies" includes parts that he believes are "more punitive than expected," including around consumer choice limitations and syndication of search data and ads. The DOJ seeks to "prohibit Google from offering anything of value" to Apple and other third-party distributors, which could disincentivize Apple from offering consumer choice and instead push Apple to explore other options, including shifting default search from Google to a competitor such as Microsoft ( MSFT ) , OpenAI, or some combination of those or other providers or to try building or buying search themselves. While the DOJ's final proposal should represent "the worst possible remedies," the analyst said that he expects Google's proposed final remedies due on December 20 to be "much more modest. " He ultimately believes the judge's final decision next summer will be more balanced between the DOJ and Google's remedies. JPMorgan has an overweight rating and $212 stock price target on shares of Alphabet. Evercore ISI analysts said they believe the government's proposed array of remedies was "mostly as expected" given press reports in recent days indicating that the government would propose forced divestiture of Chrome and a potential divestiture of Android. However, the firm said it views the government's proposed limitations on distribution agreements as "draconian" and given the roughly 6% downward move in Alphabet shares today calls this "likely a negative surprise vs. investor expectations." The firm's "quick checks with legal experts" suggest a near-term negotiated settlement is unlikely and that the case could continue to act as an overhang on shares until a final judgment on remedies is received, likely in August of next year. Evercore maintained an outperform rating and $205 price target on Alphabet shares. Related: Veteran fund manager sees world of pain coming for stocksThe Death Of A Legend: How Jimmy Carter Influenced The Auto Industry
READY to wave goodbye to 2024 and see what lies in store for the next 12 months? The Sun’s astrologer shares twists and turns for the different zodiac signs in 2025 when it comes to work, finances and good fortune. Find out if it will be a year of celestial celebration for you. And don’t miss tomorrow’s paper, when Maggie maps out events that await at home, in health and on new horizons. ARIES March 21 – April 20 CAREER: Your “take charge” Mars magic swells throughout spring and, by mid-June, you can make your boldest move. Work-based new moons on August 23 and September 21 rejig false starts into genuine opportunities. READ MORE ON HOROSCOPES CASH: Saturn’s steady hold on Aries from May to September chairs great negotiations – you possess a prime poker face! February 4 and April 30 are rich dates for finding lost tickets, accounts or legacies. Answer questions honestly in November. CHANCE: Neptune enhances intuition in everything from number choices to lucky colours from March onwards. Most read in Fabulous Teams of three, packs of four, and any talking or rapid-response challenge, are Aries-significant. TAURUS April 21 – May 21 CAREER: Friends or family who dream together can make a great business team, taking shape over the summer. With Pluto set for 20 years in your success sector, your future can break records. An October choice is a key decision. CASH: Until June, Jupiter spotlights smart ways into and out of some big money situations. Your smile can be worth a fortune! Around July 4, you can identify earning potential in a learning scenario. CHANCE: Staying silent and keeping secrets is a challenge, but with potential rich rewards. You can also find 2025 luck with music played by trios and dates that include a three. GEMINI May 22 – June 21 CAREER: Closing a decision around January 13 can lead to open doors by September 7. You see many clever ways to pivot your career profile in 2025, guided by mentor Mercury. Late November, surf a success wave straight into 2026. CASH: You have Jupiter financial flair all year – but build in Saturn common sense, too. A saving goal can come closer by September. Vintage records hide new value. CHANCE: Number two, twinned towns or cities and second-time-around entries can all have a Gemini luck link. Uranus, with its “try anything” vibe, finds success for you in contests with unusual settings, or hi-tech themes, July to November. CANCER June 22 – July 22 CAREER: Your work journey speeds up from January and Saturn-strong shoots push through in June and July. Yes, you can learn and lead. An unusual ambition around the time of October 7 deserves your full attention. CASH: Mars boosts risk taking from day one – April to June you reap rewards. Then Mercury steps in with smart strategies to double that. Stick to a money plan in September, even when temptation is strong. CHANCE: As Jupiter’s number one, by June you can feel personal luck flow. First answers, especially under pressure, your first initial and any list of number ones, past or present, can be winners. LEO July 23 – August 23 CAREER: Take the first three months to suss out what you really need from work – in April and May, Mars encourages action. Saturn supports learning all summer to ace any test or interview, however many times you’ve tried. CASH: The March 14 eclipse mixes emotions and finances – and people who love each other can enrich each other. Double new money moons in August and September show that you can start again, no matter what. Believe in better! CHANCE: Number 12, December dates/birthdays and following clue trails can lead to luck. Team up with your least-likely friend or colleague for summer success. VIRGO August 24 – September 22 CAREER: Look for Mercury career guidance and intelligence and it’s there for you, all year. From March to May, you have crystal clear future vision. Your personal moon shines so bright in August and September, nothing can stop you. CASH: Pluto’s new position underlines that people matter more than possessions – review 2025 spending plans accordingly. Wellbeing businesses, tests of patience and “H” addresses carry cash potential. CHANCE: A silly family game, a new social media connection and a local celebrity challenge can all be luck-linked for Virgo. So can football teams, November journeys and someone who changes their name in 2025. LIBRA September 23 – October 23 CAREER: Valentine’s Day to mid-April, you hit your Mercury progress stride, pushing obstacles aside and embracing challenges. June to late August, your best friend at work can be your best promotion ally. “Six” dates are career firsts. CASH: Set high saving/spending standards as the year begins, and Mars helps you meet them, maybe exceed them. Pluto’s willingness to break rules and be creative brings rich Libra chances all year, but especially when things feel toughest. CHANCE: Jackpots that double daily, sets of ten questions and a person or place first encountered in October can all add extra luck to 2025. SCORPIO October 24 – November 22 CAREER: Planet leader Pluto transforms what job security means to you – for the next 20 years, you can run risks, aim for the sky. The solar eclipse makes March 29 super-special. Neptune endows summer insight to read bosses’ lips – and minds. CASH: Creative skills – your own or others’ – can boost your 2025 bank balance as soon as Saturn gets involved. Productivity is off the scale. Minor plans that start around August bank holiday build to major profits by Christmas. CHANCE: Old maps, new languages and a decision to believe in your ability to learn, no matter what, enhance Scorpio’s winning streak. SAGITTARIUS November 23 – December 21 CAREER: Saturn helps secure success where you are in 2025, with roles or responsibilities you may not have considered. But big offers can be irresistible in August and September. On October 29 and December 11, follow facts, not fantasy. CASH: Start 2025 taking stock of what you have, as financial genius Venus backs you until summer to build on this brilliantly. In July, only invest in people and projects that mean something. Mars goes big or goes home around December 15. CHANCE: Fortune flows from feelings, so trust yours implicitly. Figures of eight and August trips can also have lucky influence. CAPRICORN December 22 – January 20 CAREER: Talk your way to success in March, put in extra hours in June. Maverick planet Uranus upends your career chart from July to November, and cautious Capricorn is no more. Get ready to surprise everyone, especially yourself. CASH: Your inner voice counts most from January to June, so ignore external spending pressures. Two travel moons, in August and September, spot some big cash chances on the move. Pluto power helps focus on the financial future, so ditch the past. CHANCE: Combining birthday dates, wedding planning and brokering deals can spell 2025 luck. An old family story can scoop a unique prize. AQUARIUS January 21 – February 18 CAREER: The positive vibes of Jupiter are zooming in on your work zone, so you approach serious ambitions with a lighter touch. Reinventing yourself can start with the full moon on January 13, alongside the “never say no” spirit of Mars. You’ve got this. CASH: Saturn has been on call in your money chart for years – but 2025 is the last one. So spend it finishing what you have started with a cool, clear head. April 7 and October 22 are crucial cash decision dates. CHANCE: Six o’clock, contests in three rounds and an event that has been postponed until next June can be Aquarius luck-finders. PISCES February 19 – March 20 CAREER: Mercury focuses your work mind from July to September, when you can visualise yourself in an exciting new role. February 28 and September 7 are Pisces push harder days. Pluto toughens up secret ambitions, giving an inner shine. CASH: Go your own way until May, when Saturn’s six-month shift encourages pooling money plans, working and winning as part of an “F” team. Pisces’ key money moon is October 7, so swap distractions for determination. READ MORE SUN STORIES CHANCE: Neptune’s natural number-choosing and success-seeking instincts kick in strongest April to October. Families of five and locations to the east can be lucky all year.
POUGHKEEPSIE, N.Y. (AP) — Elijah Lewis scored 21 points as Marist beat Binghamton 69-51 on Sunday. Lewis also had six rebounds and six assists for the Red Foxes (9-2). Josh Pascarelli added 15 points while shooting 6 for 12, including 2 for 5 from beyond the arc and grabbed seven rebounds. Jason Schofield shot 5 of 13 from the field to finish with 10 points. The Bearcats (8-7) were led by Ben Callahan-Gold, who posted 10 points. Gavin Walsh added nine points, 11 rebounds and three steals for Binghamton. Tymu Chenery had nine points and five assists. The loss snapped the Bearcats' six-game winning streak. The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar .Shohei Ohtani unanimously wins 3rd career MVP, joins Frank Robinson as only players to win in both AL and NL
Week 13 NFL Draft intel: Could Colorado's Travis Hunter keep playing both ways?
Philadelphia (8-2) at Los Angeles Rams (5-5) Sunday, 8:20 p.m. EST, NBC/Peacock Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings. Get any of our free email newsletters — news headlines, obituaries, sports, and more.
Driving Apparel Market to Surpass $23.32 Billion by 2030, Growing at a 5.90% CAGR from 2023 to 2030
No. 1 South Carolina women stunned by fifth-ranked UCLA 77-62, ending Gamecocks’ 43-game win streakFORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. (AP) — Republican senators pushed back on Sunday against criticism from Democrats that Tulsi Gabbard , Donald Trump’s pick to lead U.S. intelligence services , is “compromised” by her comments supportive of Russia and secret meetings , as a congresswoman, with Syria’s president, a close ally of the Kremlin and Iran. Sen. Tammy Duckworth, D-Illinois, a veteran of combat missions in Iraq, said she had concerns about Tulsi Gabbard, Trump’s choice to be director of national intelligence . “I think she’s compromised,” Duckworth said on CNN’s “State of the Union,” citing Gabbard’s 2017 trip to Syria, where she held talks with Syrian President Bashar Assad. Gabbard was a Democratic House member from Hawaii at the time. “The U.S. intelligence community has identified her as having troubling relationships with America’s foes. And so my worry is that she couldn’t pass a background check,” Duckworth said. Gabbard, who said last month she is joining the Republican party, has served in the Army National Guard for more than two decades. She was deployed to Iraq and Kuwait and, according to the Hawaii National Guard, received a Combat Medical Badge in 2005 for “participation in combat operations under enemy hostile fire in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom III.” Duckworth’s comments drew immediate backlash from Republicans. “For her to say ridiculous and outright dangerous words like that is wrong,” Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Oklahoma, said on CNN, challenging Duckworth to retract her words. “That’s the most dangerous thing she could say — is that a United States lieutenant colonel in the United States Army is compromised and is an asset of Russia.” In recent days, other Democrats have accused Gabbard without evidence of being a “Russian asset.” Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a Massachusetts Democrat, has claimed, without offering details, that Gabbard is in Russian President Vladimir “Putin’s pocket.” Mullin and others say the criticism from Democrats is rooted in the fact that Gabbard left their party and has become a Trump ally. Democrats say they worry that Gabbard’s selection as national intelligence chief endangers ties with allies and gives Russia a win. Rep. Adam Schiff, a California Democrat just elected to the Senate, said he would not describe Gabbard as a Russian asset, but said she had “very questionable judgment.” “The problem is if our foreign allies don’t trust the head of our intelligence agencies, they’ll stop sharing information with us,” Schiff said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” Gabbard in 2022 endorsed one of Russia’s justifications for invading Ukraine : the existence of dozens of U.S.-funded biolabs working on some of the world’s nastiest pathogens. The labs are part of an international effort to control outbreaks and stop bioweapons, but Moscow claimed Ukraine was using them to create deadly bioweapons. Gabbard said she just voiced concerns about protecting the labs. Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Missouri, said he thought it was “totally ridiculous” that Gabbard was being cast as a Russian asset for having different political views. “It’s insulting. It’s a slur, quite frankly. There’s no evidence that she’s a asset of another country,” he said on NBC. Sen. James Lankford, another Oklahoma Republican, acknowledged having “lots of questions” for Gabbard as the Senate considers her nomination to lead the intelligence services. Lankford said on NBC that he wants to ask Gabbard about her meeting with Assad and some of her past comments about Russia. “We want to know what the purpose was and what the direction for that was. As a member of Congress, we want to get a chance to talk about past comments that she’s made and get them into full context,” Lankford said.