In addition to his performances on the pitch, Rashford has also been a prominent figure off it, using his platform to advocate for social issues and charitable causes. His work to combat child poverty and support underprivileged communities has earned him widespread praise and admiration, further solidifying his status as a role model both on and off the field.The act of throwing the corner flag can also be interpreted as a statement of defiance and independence. Tottenham Hotspur, known for their attacking style of play and creative tactics, may be signaling to their rivals that they do not need to rely on traditional methods of scoring, such as corner kicks, to secure victory. This bold move by Lo Celso could be seen as a way to challenge the status quo and demonstrate the team's self-belief and determination to succeed on their own terms.
Registration for the MarsCode AI Programming Challenge is now open to programmers, developers, and AI enthusiasts of all levels. Whether you are a seasoned AI expert or a newcomer to the field, this competition offers a unique opportunity to showcase your talent, explore new ideas, and be part of a dynamic community of innovators.
Jimmy Carter had the longest post-presidency of anyone to hold the office, and one of the most active. Here is a look back at his life. 1924 — Jimmy Carter was born on Oct. 1 to Earl and Lillian Carter in the small town of Plains, Georgia. 1928 — Earl Carter bought a 350-acre farm 3 miles from Plains in the tiny community of Archery. The Carter family lived in a house on the farm without running water or electricity. 1941 — He graduated from Plains High School and enrolled at Georgia Southwestern College in Americus. 1942 — He transferred to Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta. 1943 — Carter’s boyhood dream of being in the Navy becomes a reality as he is appointed to the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, Maryland. 1946 — He received his naval commission and on July 7 married Rosalynn Smith of Plains. They moved to Norfolk, Virginia. 1946-1952 — Carter’s three sons are born, Jack in 1947, Chip in 1950 and Jeff in 1952. 1962-66 — Carter is elected to the Georgia State Senate and serves two terms. 1953 — Carter’s father died and he cut his naval career short to save the family farm. Due to a limited income, Jimmy, Rosalynn and their three sons moved into Public Housing Apartment 9A in Plains. 1966 — He ran for governor, but lost. 1967 — Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter’s fourth child, Amy, is born. 1971 — He ran for governor again and won the election, becoming Georgia’s 76th governor on Jan. 12. 1974 — Carter announced his candidacy for president. 1976 — Carter was elected 39th president on Nov. 2, narrowly defeating incumbent Gerald Ford. 1978 — U.S. and the Peoples’ Republic of China establish full diplomatic relations. President Carter negotiates and mediates an accord between Egypt and Israel at Camp David. 1979 — The Department of Education is formed. Iranian radicals overrun the U.S. Embassy and seize American hostages. The Strategic Arms Limitations Treaty is signed. 1980 — On March 21, Carter announces that the U.S. will boycott the Olympic Games scheduled in Moscow. A rescue attempt to get American hostages out of Iran is unsuccessful. Carter was defeated in his bid for a second term as president by Ronald Reagan in November. 1981 — President Carter continues to negotiate the release of the American hostages in Iran. Minutes before his term as president is over, the hostages are released. 1982 — Carter became a distinguished professor at Emory University in Atlanta, and founded The Carter Center. The nonpartisan and nonprofit center addresses national and international issues of public policy. 1984 — Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter volunteer one week a year for Habitat for Humanity, a nonprofit organization that helps needy people in the United States and in other countries renovate and build homes, until 2020. He also taught Sunday school in the Maranatha Baptist Church of Plains from the mid-’80s until 2020. 2002 — Awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. 2015 — Carter announced in August he had been diagnosed with melanoma that spread to his brain. 2016 — He said in March that he no longer needed cancer treatment. 2024 — Carter dies at 100 years old. Sources: Cartercenter.org, Plains Historical Preservation Trust, The Associated Press; The Brookings Institution; U.S. Navy; WhiteHouse.gov, Gallup
The protection of minors and their rights is a critical aspect of any society. As young individuals who are still in the process of physical, emotional, and intellectual development, minors are particularly vulnerable to various risks and challenges. In this context, the role of the law and legal professionals is essential in ensuring that minors are provided with a safe and supportive environment to grow and thrive.
India will host the World Audio Visual Entertainment Summit (WAVES) for the first time in February next year which will be a global platform for its creative talents, fostering collaborations and showcasing the country's potential as a hub for world-class content creation. Prime Minister Narendra Modi spoke extensively about the WAVES Summit in his monthly 'Mann ki Baat' Radio address on Sunday. Comparing the WAVES to global events like the World Economic Forum in Davos, Modi said the leaders from the media and entertainment industry as well as creative minds from across the globe will gather in Delhi for the Summit being held from February 5-9. "This Summit is an important step towards making India a hub of global content creation," he said. The prime minister emphasized the pivotal role of young creators in the preparations for WAVES, reflecting the dynamic spirit of India's creative community. He expressed pride in the enthusiasm of the country's youth and their contribution to the burgeoning creator economy, a key driver as India advances toward becoming a five trillion dollar economy. "Whether you are a young creator or an established artist, associated with Bollywood or regional cinema, a professional from the TV industry, an expert in animation, gaming, or an innovator in entertainment technology, I encourage you to be a part of the WAVES Summit," Modi said. He urged all stakeholders in the entertainment and creative industries to actively participate in the WAVES. "The WAVES Summit is poised to serve as a global platform for India's creative talents, fostering collaborations and showcasing the country's potential as a hub for world-class content creation," Modi said. The Summit will also highlight India's advancements in animation, gaming, entertainment technology, and regional and mainstream cinema, he added. Modi also paid heartfelt tributes to ace director Raj Kapoor and singer Mohammed Rafi on their 100th birth anniversaries. Raj Kapoor's role in showcasing India's soft power through his timeless films and Mohammed Rafi's mesmerizing voice that continues to resonate with all generations, he said. Modi also recalled Akkineni Nageswara Rao's contributions in elevating Telugu cinema while reflecting the Indian traditions. He also honored Tapan Sinha's socially conscious films that inspired unity and awareness. Modi said these legends not only shaped the golden era of Indian cinema but also strengthened India's cultural heritage, leaving behind an everlasting legacy for generations to admire and draw inspiration from.
EVANSVILLE, Ind. (AP) — Cameron Haffner scored 13 points as Evansville beat Missouri State 57-40 on Sunday to snap a five-game losing streak. Haffner went 5 of 12 from the field (3 for 7 from 3-point range) for the Purple Aces (4-9, 1-1 Missouri Valley Conference). Joshua Hughes added 11 points, nine rebounds and four steals. Tayshawn Comer scored 11. Dez White finished with 12 points, four assists and six steals for the Bears (7-6, 0-2). Missouri State also got 10 points, 12 rebounds and two steals from Michael Osei-Bonsu. Zaxton King had eight points. Evansville carried a slim three-point lead into halftime, as Haffner led the way with seven points. Evansville took the lead for what would be the final time on Haffner's 3-pointer with 18:44 remaining in the second half. His team would outscore Missouri State by 14 points in the second half. The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar .
DJI Air 3S drone reviewDunn with 28 and Carnegie with 24 highlight No. 13 Georgia Tech women's 100-61 rout of Pittsburgh
One of the key areas covered in the Public Prosecutors' Open Class Series is the legal responsibilities of parents and guardians towards minors. It highlights the importance of parental supervision, care, and support in ensuring the well-being and welfare of minors. By emphasizing the legal obligations of parents, the series encourages them to actively engage in their children's lives and take necessary steps to protect and promote their rights.The emergence of the "rejoice" cases in Herb Valley, a renowned health retreat known for its traditional healing practices, had initially sparked hope and optimism. However, as more patients presented severe symptoms and deteriorated rapidly, it became clear that a dark cloud was descending upon the valley.Timeline: Jimmy Carter, 1924-2024
After bypoll win SP leader says will visit temples churches gurdwaras for supportersAs South Korea grapples with the aftermath of this historic decision, it is imperative that all stakeholders work together to ensure a peaceful and transparent resolution to the crisis. The rule of law, democratic principles, and respect for human rights must be upheld throughout this process to safeguard the country's democratic institutions and restore public trust in the government.Young editor, video maker edits sound tracks for movie with astronauts, works at home office. Film ... [+] footage and program interface with tools on computer and big digital screen. Post production concept. As artificial intelligence reshapes the technological landscape, a new paradigm is emerging in content creation: the hybrid workflow. This approach combines AI efficiency with human creativity, and it's rapidly becoming the standard for how modern content creators work. At the forefront of this transformation are tools like Opus Clip, whose use cases offer valuable insights into how AI is augmenting rather than replacing human creativity. "Where we really see ourselves more than anything else, is an efficiency tool," explains Conor Eliot of Opus Clip. "We're not trying to replace any aspect of the human creative process. We're just trying to make life a lot easier for people to take care of the boring stuff, so that they can go out and do the exciting, fun stuff, which is making really cool content." This philosophy represents a broader shift in how many creators are approaching AI: not as a replacement for human creativity, but as a sophisticated tool in their creative arsenal. The emergence of AI-powered creative tools marks a significant evolution in content creation. Many of these tools are designed to handle the time-consuming technical aspects of content production, allowing creators to focus on strategic and creative decisions. While AI handles the technical heavy lifting, humans remain firmly in control of the creative direction. As Eliot emphasizes, "Our vision as a team at Opus clip is that AI is just another tool. It's a tool in your tool kit. It's not designed to replace human creativity." Samsung’s Android 15 Leak—Bad News For Nearly All Galaxy Owners Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Release Date Leaks Samsung Slashes Galaxy Z Fold 6 Price In Early January Sale The new workflow acknowledges the unique requirements of different platforms. "TikTok is the ultimate discoverability platform," Eliot notes, while explaining how different platforms serve different purposes in a creator's strategy. "We spent months and months trying a huge number of different models," Eliot says, describing the development process of their AI Curation feature. "Our system, on a high level, is a hook based system. [We] trained the AI to be able to identify what is the juiciest, the most engaging, the most attractive, first three to five seconds throughout this video." One of the most significant aspects of this new hybrid workflow is its accessibility. Unlike traditional production tools that often required significant investment, new AI-powered tools are being designed with accessibility in mind. "We want this tool to be accessible to as many people as possible," Eliot explains, discussing their pricing strategy. Despite the benefits, implementing effective hybrid workflows isn't without challenges. Content creators must navigate: - Learning to effectively direct AI tools - Maintaining authentic audience connections - Balancing efficiency with quality - Managing a cross-platform content strategy The creative industry is experiencing a fundamental shift in how content is produced. "Content creation has become so niche, where everybody has a very specific audience that they're talking to," Eliot observes. This specialization, combined with AI tools, is enabling creators to produce more targeted, engaging content while maintaining their unique voice. As AI tools evolve, I think we will continue to see the focus on augmenting rather than replacing human creativity. The future of content creation lies not in choosing between human or artificial intelligence, but in mastering their combination. "I think you'll see people pretty quickly realize that they don't really like [purely AI-generated content]," Eliot predicts. "What it comes back to is the value of content, more than anything else, is the community and connection that it brings with it." The emergence of these hybrid workflows represents not just a technological shift, but a reimagining of the creative process itself. As these tools become more sophisticated, I predict the creators who thrive will be those who can effectively harness AI's efficiency while maintaining the human elements that make content truly engaging. Check the full interview with Conor on the Business of Creators podcast .
The below narrative is based on the one to one interaction that Dr Kasturirangan had with Dr Manmohan Singh; first in Dr Kasturirangan’s capacity as Member Rajya Sabha and subsequently, as Member of the Planning Commission. This narration reflects the various dimensions of Dr Kasturirangan’s direct association with Dr Manmohan Singh and also provides an insight into the thought process of the Prime Minister. My term as a member of Rajya Sabha was hardly one year when the NDA-led government relinquished their office after the UPA won the 2004 election. Dr Manmohan Singh was chosen as the UPA prime minister. My role as a nominated member did not require me to work with any particular party or deal with a specific party agenda. However, due to my own views on matters like environment, education, transportation, and S&T, I periodically made statements in that august body, which did give me a certain level of respect among the members who transcended the various political ideologies. In this context, I would like to specifically recall my participation in the Nuclear Deal 123 (123 Agreement) about which there was a major one-day discussion on December 4, 2007. In fact, during an earlier discussion on this subject, I had broadly expressed my view supporting Indo-US collaboration. On the Nuclear Deal 123 itself, I had informed some of the important members from both UPA and NDA that I would be in favour of this deal because of its long-term advantages for our country. When Nuclear Deal 123 was to be taken up for discussion, since I had already voiced my point-of-view, the congress floor coordinator suggested that I would be given as much time as I wanted for making my statement. It was obvious that my statement would certainly strengthen passing the bill in Rajya Sabha. Normally, nominated members are allowed to speak for only 5 to 10 minutes. Considering that my own statement was going to take much longer because I was planning to touch upon various dimensions of the deal, the availability of more time was certainly advantageous for highlighting those different aspects. During the debate, I articulated my own arguments with carefully prepared notes. At the end of my 29 minutes of presentation, there was a widespread appreciation of my talk from various quarters—in particular from the UPA members—including BJD, NCP, and some other parties. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, who was spearheading this bill and taking it personally to see this programme through, was keenly following this debate. In particular, he sat through my entire speech with Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee (served later as president of our country). At the end of my speech, Manmohan Singh was so delighted that he waved his hand from his seat in appreciation of what I had said. What is even more memorable about this day is the fact that, when I was having dinner with some of my MP colleagues that evening, I received a call around 10:00 pm from the prime minister. He went on again to express his happiness and thanked me for my ’brilliant’ speech. While I thanked him for the compliment, I told him that I hadn’t done anything special because it had come from my heart as a genuine feeling. In the context of energy security, power generated through nuclear reactors would become a key element of the overall energy programme. Some of the world’s largest thorium deposits have been found in India. Thus, the original vision of Homi Bhabha of going through a three-phase nuclear programme resulting ultimately in using India’s thorium is a wise step. In my view, the concept has withstood the test of time. The PM’s interest to develop a strategy to translate this vision of Bhabha’s as a major energy source is timely and appropriate. Prime Minister Singh said that he appreciated this attitude of mine. Nevertheless, he felt that he had to call me and tell me how important my talk was from the point-of-view of supporting the Nuclear Deal 123 Agreement. He felt that he should make a special mention of this to me through this call. What a gesture from the prime minister of this country! My tenure as member of Rajya Sabha was coming to an end in September of 2009, and I was thinking about getting back to Bangalore to settle down and pursue my long delayed desire to write about some of my experiences in the space programme and with Rajya Sabha. One evening, in the end of June of 2009, I received a call from the prime minister’s principal secretary, TKA Nair. He immediately came to the point and informed me that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh wanted to talk to me about the possibility of me joining the Planning Commission as a Member. PM Manmohan Singh came on the line and asked me first when my term with Rajya Sabha would end. I said sometime around the latter half of September, which was in another two months. He wanted to know if I could relinquish my Rajya Sabha membership and join him as a Member of the India Planning Commission immediately. I was quite receptive to this idea. However, he wanted to check whether I would lose any terminal benefits from Rajya Sabha by prematurely leaving the upper house of parliament. I said I could check on that and confirm that if I leave Rajya Sabha in the final three months of my term, I wouldn’t stand to lose any benefits. I also confirmed to him, in case there are no other procedural formalities, I would certainly accept this invitation from the prime minister. I thanked him and promised to do my best working with him in the capacity as a member. This continued another five years of association with a prime minister for the fifth consecutive time for me. I joined the Indian Planning Commission on July 9, 2009 and reported directly to Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia. I soon realised that Dr Montek Singh Ahluwalia was not only an expert in economics but also had a very broad understanding of the different dimensions of development of India, including the socioeconomic front, industrial aspects, infrastructure, international relations, and many other related matters. He assigned the responsibilities of science and technology, environment and forests, agricultural research, and climate change to me in the Planning Commission. As part of formally inducting me into the Planning Commission, Dr Manmohan Singh administered the oath of office in his capacity as the chairman of the Planning Commission. The Prime Minister, acting as the chairman, periodically visited and met the members of the Planning Commission and also discussed with them the progress of various activities. There were also occasions when I went and met the prime minister independently to brief him on certain specific issues, such as our emerging capabilities of monsoon predictions, disaster management, environmental issues, and GM crops. In these meetings, the discussions itself were very rigorous and focused. From Prime Minister Singh’s suggestions for future courses of actions, I had an insight of the deep understanding that he had of various issues. During my tenure in the Planning Commission, issues emerging from the study carried out on the conservation of the Western Ghats, under the famous environmentalist Prof Madhav Gadgil, came up for discussion. The prime minister told the Ministry of Environment and Forests that the report had to be reviewed by a committee to be chaired by me to take the various recommendations and suggestions forward. This proved to be a major task. On another occasion, the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO), under his direction, asked me to chair a high-level committee to examine the different aspects of waste-to-energy. This was a complex task that we just managed to finish before I left the Planning Commission. Whenever I met Prime Minister Manmohan Singh on other occasions and engaged with him in conversations, I found him very receptive to ideas on the matters I handled in the Planning Commission, such as S&T, environmental issues, climate change, weather systems, and agriculture research. With an extraordinary deputy chairman in Dr Montek Singh Ahluwalia and a set of intellectuals who were my fellow colleagues, the Planning Commission under Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s chairmanship turned out to be five years of eventful experiences. It was very demanding in terms of my time; nevertheless, exciting, challenging, and most importantly, bringing the best out of each of the members. My term on the Planning Commission came to an end on May 6, 2014 when Prime Minister Narendra Modi took over the reins of the country. On that day, all of us submitted our resignations to our boss, Dr Manmohan Singh, who in turn would submit it along with his own to the incoming Prime Minister, which was the convention at that time. I went and called on Prime Minister Manmohan Singh that morning to express my gratitude for the opportunity of working with him for the past five years. I told him that he had made my association with the Planning Commission—and with him in particular—a really memorable one. Considering that the Planning Commission occupied the apex in developing strategies, directions, and policies for the country, to me it was one of the best periods to gain a perspective on the national level and allow my own ability to play a direct but humble role in India’s development. I also took two reports—one related to the Western Ghats and the other on waste-to-energy—and told him that, even though the final decisions were yet to be taken on these reports, I would always treat them as directly coming out of his vision and ideas. Manmohan Singh likewise expressed his deep appreciation for the efforts that I had made while being a part of the Planning Commission. He also recalled the speech I gave regarding the 123 Agreement and again emphasised that he himself gained clarity on several issues after hearing my elucidation on the nuclear deal and had very many good words to say about my performance. Finally, when I took leave of him, he stood up, shook my hands, and guided me to the door. As I was about to emerge out of his room, he made a very thoughtful remark, saying, “Let us continue to remain friends.” I will always remember Dr. Manmohan Singh as a great and noble soul. To have had the opportunity to work with him certainly was a unique blessing in my life. His extraordinarily sharp intellect and deep knowledge were always tempered with humility.
As the investigation into the shooting continues, authorities are working diligently to piece together the events leading up to the attack and determine the full extent of the suspect's motives. The swift apprehension of the gunman serves as a reminder of the dedication and vigilance of law enforcement in ensuring the safety and security of the public.In a devastating turn of events, the first patient in Herb Valley, who was initially labeled as a "rejoice" case, is now on the verge of death. The death toll in connection to the mysterious illness has spiked to 30, leaving the community in shock and mourning.
Title: The Shocking Tale of Terrifying Lady Tiana in Stand-up Comedy Show on Female Safety
The Patriots are bolstering their roster ahead of Sunday's matchup with the Dolphins, elevating linebacker Keshawn Banks and tight end Jack Westover from the practice squad. Banks, who made his Patriots debut last week against the Rams on special teams, could see increased defensive snaps this time around. The promotion comes as New England faces potential depth issues in their front seven, with linebackers Anfernee Jennings and Sione Takitaki both questionable with knee injuries. Defensive ends Deatrich Wise Jr. and Keion White are also listed as questionable. Kirby Lee-Imagn Images The 24-year-old San Diego State product joined New England's practice squad a month ago after being released by the Packers following training camp. While Banks has yet to record his first NFL tackle, Sunday could provide that opportunity. Westover, meanwhile, could make his NFL debut after joining the Patriots' practice squad in October. The former Washington tight end initially signed with Seattle as an undrafted free agent but was waived with an injury designation after training camp. At 6-foot-2 and 245 pounds, Westover's connection with former college teammate Ja'Lynn Polk could potentially help spark the struggling receiver. The roster moves come as New England attempts to snap a four-game losing streak in Miami. Kickoff at Hard Rock Stadium is set for 1 p.m. ET. Related: Jerod Mayo Dismisses Drake Maye RumorsTOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Republicans made claims about illegal voting by noncitizens a centerpiece of their 2024 campaign messaging and plan to push legislation in the new Congress requiring voters to provide proof of U.S. citizenship. Yet there's one place with a GOP supermajority where linking voting to citizenship appears to be a nonstarter: Kansas. That's because the state has been there, done that, and all but a few Republicans would prefer not to go there again. Kansas imposed a proof-of-citizenship requirement over a decade ago that grew into one of the biggest political fiascos in the state in recent memory. The law, passed by the state Legislature in 2011 and implemented two years later, ended up blocking the voter registrations of more than 31,000 U.S. citizens who were otherwise eligible to vote. That was 12% of everyone seeking to register in Kansas for the first time. Federal courts ultimately declared the law an unconstitutional burden on voting rights, and it hasn't been enforced since 2018. Kansas provides a cautionary tale about how pursuing an election concern that in fact is extremely rare risks disenfranchising a far greater number of people who are legally entitled to vote. The state’s top elections official, Secretary of State Scott Schwab, championed the idea as a legislator and now says states and the federal government shouldn't touch it. “Kansas did that 10 years ago,” said Schwab, a Republican. “It didn’t work out so well.” Steven Fish, a 45-year-old warehouse worker in eastern Kansas, said he understands the motivation behind the law. In his thinking, the state was like a store owner who fears getting robbed and installs locks. But in 2014, after the birth of his now 11-year-old son inspired him to be “a little more responsible” and follow politics, he didn’t have an acceptable copy of his birth certificate to get registered to vote in Kansas. “The locks didn’t work,” said Fish, one of nine Kansas residents who sued the state over the law. “You caught a bunch of people who didn’t do anything wrong.” Kansas' experience appeared to receive little if any attention outside the state as Republicans elsewhere pursued proof-of-citizenship requirements this year. Arizona enacted a requirement this year, applying it to voting for state and local elections but not for Congress or president. The Republican-led U.S. House passed a proof-of-citizenship requirement in the summer and plans to bring back similar legislation after the GOP won control of the Senate in November. In Ohio, the Republican secretary of state revised the form that poll workers use for voter eligibility challenges to require those not born in the U.S. to show naturalization papers to cast a regular ballot. A federal judge declined to block the practice days before the election. Also, sizable majorities of voters in Iowa, Kentucky, Missouri, Oklahoma, South Carolina and the presidential swing states of North Carolina and Wisconsin were inspired to amend their state constitutions' provisions on voting even though the changes were only symbolic. Provisions that previously declared that all U.S. citizens could vote now say that only U.S. citizens can vote — a meaningless distinction with no practical effect on who is eligible. To be clear, voters already must attest to being U.S. citizens when they register to vote and noncitizens can face fines, prison and deportation if they lie and are caught. “There is nothing unconstitutional about ensuring that only American citizens can vote in American elections,” U.S. Rep. Chip Roy, of Texas, the leading sponsor of the congressional proposal, said in an email statement to The Associated Press. After Kansas residents challenged their state's law, both a federal judge and federal appeals court concluded that it violated a law limiting states to collecting only the minimum information needed to determine whether someone is eligible to vote. That's an issue Congress could resolve. The courts ruled that with “scant” evidence of an actual problem, Kansas couldn't justify a law that kept hundreds of eligible citizens from registering for every noncitizen who was improperly registered. A federal judge concluded that the state’s evidence showed that only 39 noncitizens had registered to vote from 1999 through 2012 — an average of just three a year. In 2013, then-Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, a Republican who had built a national reputation advocating tough immigration laws, described the possibility of voting by immigrants living in the U.S. illegally as a serious threat. He was elected attorney general in 2022 and still strongly backs the idea, arguing that federal court rulings in the Kansas case “almost certainly got it wrong.” Kobach also said a key issue in the legal challenge — people being unable to fix problems with their registrations within a 90-day window — has probably been solved. “The technological challenge of how quickly can you verify someone’s citizenship is getting easier,” Kobach said. “As time goes on, it will get even easier.” The U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear the Kansas case in 2020. But in August, it split 5-4 in allowing Arizona to continue enforcing its law for voting in state and local elections while a legal challenge goes forward. Seeing the possibility of a different Supreme Court decision in the future, U.S. Rep.-elect Derek Schmidt says states and Congress should pursue proof-of-citizenship requirements. Schmidt was the Kansas attorney general when his state's law was challenged. "If the same matter arose now and was litigated, the facts would be different," he said in an interview. But voting rights advocates dismiss the idea that a legal challenge would turn out differently. Mark Johnson, one of the attorneys who fought the Kansas law, said opponents now have a template for a successful court fight. “We know the people we can call," Johnson said. “We know that we’ve got the expert witnesses. We know how to try things like this.” He predicted "a flurry — a landslide — of litigation against this.” Initially, the Kansas requirement's impacts seemed to fall most heavily on politically unaffiliated and young voters. As of fall 2013, 57% of the voters blocked from registering were unaffiliated and 40% were under 30. But Fish was in his mid-30s, and six of the nine residents who sued over the Kansas law were 35 or older. Three even produced citizenship documents and still didn’t get registered, according to court documents. “There wasn’t a single one of us that was actually an illegal or had misinterpreted or misrepresented any information or had done anything wrong,” Fish said. He was supposed to produce his birth certificate when he sought to register in 2014 while renewing his Kansas driver's license at an office in a strip mall in Lawrence. A clerk wouldn't accept the copy Fish had of his birth certificate. He still doesn't know where to find the original, having been born on an Air Force base in Illinois that closed in the 1990s. Several of the people joining Fish in the lawsuit were veterans, all born in the U.S., and Fish said he was stunned that they could be prevented from registering. Liz Azore, a senior adviser to the nonpartisan Voting Rights Lab, said millions of Americans haven't traveled outside the U.S. and don't have passports that might act as proof of citizenship, or don't have ready access to their birth certificates. She and other voting rights advocates are skeptical that there are administrative fixes that will make a proof-of-citizenship law run more smoothly today than it did in Kansas a decade ago. “It’s going to cover a lot of people from all walks of life,” Avore said. “It’s going to be disenfranchising large swaths of the country.” Associated Press writer Julie Carr Smyth in Columbus, Ohio, contributed to this report.