首页 > 

spongebob blackjack

2025-01-25
Murray – Britain’s greatest ever player – retired after this summer’s Olympics at the age of 37 after finally admitting defeat in his battle against his body. Many in the game expected the Scot would one day return to tennis and become a coach, particularly due to his love of the sport, hard work and his tactical acumen. But it came with some degree of shock on Saturday afternoon when a social media post from Djokovic, playing on Murray’s light-hearted tweet upon his departure, read: “He never liked retirement anyway”. The attached video announced Murray, who he lost to in two Slam finals but beat in four Australian showpieces, would coach him over the winter and through January’s Open in Melbourne. “We played each other since we were boys, 25 years of pushing each other to our limits. We had some of the most epic battles in in our sport. They called us gamechangers, risk-takers, history-makers,” Djokovic said. “I thought our story may be over. Turns out it has one final chapter. It’s time for one of my toughest opponents to step into my corner. Welcome aboard, coach Andy Murray.” Murray, who beat Djokovic to win the US Open in 2012 and Wimbledon in 2013, says he wants to help the 24-time grand slam champion achieve his goals. “I’m going to be joining Novak’s team in the off-season, helping him to prepare for the Australian Open, he said. “I’m really excited for it and looking forward to spending time on the same side of the net as Novak for a change, helping him to achieve his goals.” Djokovic, a week younger than his new coach, added: “I am excited to have one of my greatest rivals on the same side of the net, as my coach. “Looking forward to the start of the season and competing in Australia alongside Andy with whom I have shared many exceptional moments on the Australian soil.” Djokovic beat Murray in the 2011, 2013, 2015 and 2016 Australian Open finals as well as the French Open final in 2016. It was after he unseated Djokovic at the top of the rankings in 2016 that Murray suffered the hip injury which ultimately derailed his career. Since his retirement, Murray has been playing golf with the same dedication he pursued his tennis but will now return to his natural habitat. Djokovic, who split with coach Goran Ivanisevic earlier this year, hopes that adding Murray to his team will help him get back to the top of the game after he went through a calendar year without winning a grand slam for the first time since 2017. Jannik Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz have developed a stranglehold at the top of the men’s game and Djokovic, who has seen Murray, Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal all retire in recent years, is still hoping to move clear of the record 24 grand slams he shares with Margaret Court.Temu Spends $500 Million Weekly On PR, Ads and SalesC omplex issues and phenomena such as global warming and climate change, poverty, migration and displacement cannot be addressed by a single discipline. They need to be studied from an interdisciplinary or multidisciplinary perspective so that we can grapple with them comprehensively and meaningfully. Global warming and climate change, for instance, need to be addressed by experts drawn from different disciplines such as Glaciology, Hydrology, Oceanography, Geology, Geography, Geoinformatics, and Engineering and Technology. Similarly, migration and displacement need to be discussed by experts from Political Science, Geopolitics, Economics, Sociology, Ecology, Human Rights, and Literature. Unfortunately, academia is subtly biased in favour of “academic tribes and territories” (Becher and Trowler 2001). Against this backdrop, we need to highlight the ongoing debate between ‘generalists’ and ‘specialists’. While the generalists, even as they are grounded in their respective disciplines, strive to strike a conversation with their counterparts in other departments to promote interdisciplinary thinking and collaboration, the specialists prefer to confine themselves to their respective areas and guard their territory. Disciplinary boundary crossing is an anathema to them. In Academic Tribes and Territories, Becher and Trowler address the issue and point out that “the tribes of academe ... define their own identities and defend their own patches of intellectual ground by employing a variety of devices geared to the exclusion of illegal immigrants.” But academicians should shed their silos syndrome as a fragmented and piecemeal approach to the pursuit of knowledge will not produce tangible results. Subtle differences At this juncture, we need clarity about what exactly is meant by interdisciplinarity and the reasons to embrace it. We also need to distinguish it from its cognate: multidisciplinarity. There are subtle but crucial differences between the two. Both call for the presence of various disciplines but the level of integration between them is differential. While the integration of different disciplines is quite high in interdisciplinary programmes and projects, it is limited in the case of multidisciplinary endeavours. The former aims at amalgamation and synthesis of ideas and theories and the latter is rather reluctant to shed its disciplinary character. In short, while interdisciplinarity insists on integration of ideas, multidisciplinarity focuses on juxtaposition with limited space for integration. In Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory and Practice, Klein points out that the coming together of different disciplines in multidisciplinary endeavours is “essentially additive, not integrative”. Why are academicians reluctant to undertake interdisciplinary projects? There are five major reasons. First, the epistemological clash, sometimes incompatible, between different disciplinary perspectives is a hurdle and a challenge. Second, getting to know a new discipline involves time and energy, and many prefer to expend their energies in their own disciplines and territories where they already have a foothold. Third, there is hardly any incentive for undertaking innovative interdisciplinary projects. Fourth, when it comes to research projects and publications, editors are inclined towards papers in conventional disciplines. As a result, interdisciplinary projects get sidelined. Finally, interpersonal issues crop up while undertaking interdisciplinary projects with issues relating to seniority and ownership of the project occasionally rearing their heads. Fostering interdisciplinarity What should be done to shed academic tribalism and foster interdisciplinarity? First, higher educational institutions should, under the Choice-Based Credit System, offer interdisciplinary courses in domains such as AI, Nanotechnology, and Digital Humanities. Teaching pedagogy too could be interdisciplinary. A course like Philosophy and Literature could be co-taught by faculty from the two departments. Second, allied departments could come together and organise interdisciplinary seminars and conferences. For instance, Chemistry and Life Sciences could come together and explore common topics such as enzyme catalysis, kinetics, energy and metabolism. English and Political Science could organise a conference on a topic like language and ideology. Language departments such as Tamil, Hindi, French, and English can pool their resources and explore themes in comparative literature and translation. Third, research scholars and postgraduate students should be motivated to explore interdisciplinary topics for their projects. Finally, border-crossing leading to interdepartmental networking. So interdisciplinary collaboration should be recognised and incentivised. Academic tribalism breeds a culture of hierarchy, insularity and traditionalism. Therefore, academia should ensure that the curriculum is innovative, interdisciplinary and holistic and encourage and help shape our students into multifaceted individuals. The writer is Emeritus Professor, Gandhigram Rural Institute, Gandhigram, Tamil Nadu. Email: josephdorairaj@gmail.com Published - November 30, 2024 03:00 pm IST Copy link Email Facebook Twitter Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit The Hindu Education Plus / higher education / careers / students / university / universities and collegesspongebob blackjack



Andrew Luck returning to Stanford football as general managerThe people that president-elect Donald Trump has selected to lead federal health agencies in his second administration include a retired congressman, a surgeon and a former talk-show host. All of them could play pivotal roles in fulfilling a new political agenda that could change how the government goes about safeguarding Americans' health — from health care and medicines to food safety and science research. And if Congress approves, at the helm of the team as Department of Health and Human Services secretary will be prominent environmental lawyer and anti-vaccine organizer Robert F. Kennedy Jr. By and large, the nominees don't have experience running large bureaucratic agencies, but they know how to talk about health on TV . Centers for Medicare and Medicaid pick Dr. Mehmet Oz hosted a talk show for 13 years and is a well-known wellness and lifestyle influencer. The pick for the Food and Drug Administration, Dr. Marty Makary, and for surgeon general, Dr. Janette Nesheiwat, are frequent Fox News contributors. Many on the list were critical of COVID-19 measures like masking and booster vaccinations for young people. Some of them have ties to Florida like many of Trump's other Cabinet nominees: CDC pick Dr. Dave Weldon represented the state in Congress for 14 years and is affiliated with a medical group on the state's Atlantic coast. Nesheiwat's brother-in-law is Rep. Mike Waltz , R-Fla., tapped by Trump as national security adviser. Here's a look at the nominees' potential role in carrying out what Kennedy says is the task to “reorganize” agencies, which have an overall $1.7 billion budget; employ 80,000 scientists, researchers, doctors and other officials; and affect the lives of all Americans. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention The Atlanta-based CDC, with a $9.2 billion core budget, is charged with protecting Americans from disease outbreaks and other public health threats. Kennedy has long attacked vaccines and criticized the CDC, repeatedly alleging corruption at the agency. He said on a 2023 podcast that there is "no vaccine that is safe and effective,” and urged people to resist the CDC's guidelines on if and when kids should get vaccinated . Decades ago, Kennedy found common ground with Weldon , the 71-year-old nominee to run the CDC who served in the Army and worked as an internal medicine doctor before he represented a central Florida congressional district from 1995 to 2009. Starting in the early 2000s, Weldon had a prominent part in a debate about whether there was a relationship between a vaccine preservative called thimerosal and autism. He was a founding member of the Congressional Autism Caucus and tried to ban thimerosal from all vaccines. Kennedy, then a senior attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council, believed there was a tie between thimerosal and autism and also charged that the government hid documents showing the danger. Since 2001, all vaccines manufactured for the U.S. market and routinely recommended for children 6 years or younger have contained no thimerosal or only trace amounts, with the exception of inactivated influenza vaccine. Meanwhile, study after study after study found no evidence that thimerosal caused autism. Weldon's congressional voting record suggests he may go along with Republican efforts to downsize the CDC, including to eliminate the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, which works on topics like drownings, drug overdoses and shooting deaths. Weldon also voted to ban federal funding for needle-exchange programs as an approach to reduce overdoses, and the National Rifle Association gave him an “A” rating for his pro-gun rights voting record. Food and Drug Administration Kennedy is extremely critical of the FDA, which has 18,000 employees and is responsible for the safety and effectiveness of prescription drugs, vaccines and other medical products — as well as overseeing cosmetics, electronic cigarettes and most foods. Makary, Trump’s pick to run the FDA, is closely aligned with Kennedy on several topics . The professor at Johns Hopkins University who is a trained surgeon and cancer specialist has decried the overprescribing of drugs, the use of pesticides on foods and the undue influence of pharmaceutical and insurance companies over doctors and government regulators. Kennedy has suggested he'll clear our “entire” FDA departments and also recently threatened to fire FDA employees for “aggressive suppression” of a host of unsubstantiated products and therapies, including stem cells, raw milk , psychedelics and discredited COVID-era treatments like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. Makary's contrarian views during the COVID-19 pandemic including the need for masking and giving young kids COVID vaccine boosters. But anything Makary and Kennedy might want to do when it comes to unwinding FDA regulations or revoking long-standing vaccine and drug approvals would be challenging. The agency has lengthy requirements for removing medicines from the market, which are based on federal laws passed by Congress. Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services The agency provides health care coverage for more than 160 million people through Medicaid, Medicare and the Affordable Care Act, and also sets Medicare payment rates for hospitals, doctors and other providers. With a $1.1 trillion budget and more than 6,000 employees, Oz has a massive agency to run if confirmed — and an agency that Kennedy hasn't talked about much when it comes to his plans. While Trump tried to scrap the Affordable Care Act in his first term, Kennedy has not taken aim at it yet. But he has been critical of Medicaid and Medicare for covering expensive weight-loss drugs — though they're not widely covered by either . Trump said during his campaign that he would protect Medicare, which provides insurance for older Americans. Oz has endorsed expanding Medicare Advantage — a privately run version of Medicare that is popular but also a source of widespread fraud — in an AARP questionnaire during his failed 2022 bid for a U.S. Senate seat in Pennsylvania and in a 2020 Forbes op-ed with a former Kaiser Permanente CEO. Oz also said in a Washington Examiner op-ed with three co-writers that aging healthier and living longer could help fix the U.S. budget deficit because people would work longer and add more to the gross domestic product. Neither Trump nor Kennedy have said much about Medicaid, the insurance program for low-income Americans. Trump's first administration reshaped the program by allowing states to introduce work requirements for recipients. Surgeon general Kennedy doesn't appear to have said much publicly about what he'd like to see from surgeon general position, which is the nation's top doctor and oversees 6,000 U.S. Public Health Service Corps members. The surgeon general has little administrative power, but can be an influential government spokesperson on what counts as a public health danger and what to do about it — suggesting things like warning labels for products and issuing advisories. The current surgeon general, Vivek Murthy, declared gun violence as a public health crisis in June. Trump's pick, Nesheiwat, is employed as a New York City medical director with CityMD, a group of urgent care facilities in the New York and New Jersey area, and has been at City MD for 12 years. She also has appeared on Fox News and other TV shows, authored a book on the “transformative power of prayer” in her medical career and endorses a brand of vitamin supplements. She encouraged COVID-19 vaccines during the pandemic, calling them “a gift from God” in a February 2021 Fox News op-ed, as well as anti-viral pills like Paxlovid. In a 2019 Q&A with the Women in Medicine Legacy Foundation , Nesheiwat said she is a “firm believer in preventive medicine” and “can give a dissertation on hand-washing alone.” National Institutes of Health As of Saturday, Trump had not yet named his choice to lead the National Institutes of Health, which funds medical research through grants to researchers across the nation and conducts its own research. It has a $48 billion budget. Kennedy has said he'd pause drug development and infectious disease research to shift the focus to chronic diseases. He'd like to keep NIH funding from researchers with conflicts of interest, and criticized the agency in 2017 for what he said was not doing enough research into the role of vaccines in autism — an idea that has long been debunked . ___ Associated Press writers Amanda Seitz and Matt Perrone and AP editor Erica Hunzinger contributed to this report. ___ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Science and Educational Media Group and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content. Mike Stobbe, The Associated Press

TIMES of political turmoil and global challenge can also be times for publicly taking a stance. To find out what keeps them going when times seem toughest, this reporter spoke to three Limerick-based activists to delve into what motivates them. “It’s not like I even thought about caring,” says Alice Abreu, a Portuguese violinist in Limerick who uses her social media platform for advocating for national and international issues. “It was more a thing of connecting with my inner self and realising that I do care.” For University of Limerick psychology student Molly McNamara, it was a revelation of her own privilege. “I get to go home every day and not worry about my house getting bombed or losing every single person in my family,” she said. Speaking to this reporter, Molly shed a tear as she spoke about a doctor in Palestine who she has formed a friendship with. “He doesn’t get the privilege that I have of turning off my phone and now the problem doesn’t exist anymore.” Molly is a member of a committee that manages the grassroots Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement within the UL community, condemning the university’s links with Israeli companies. “When you’re interested in social relations and international relationships and politics it’s kind of hard to not see systems and patterns of oppression,” she says. She considers that as a “privileged person”, she has the right to protest for people that cannot do so. Ben Desjarlais, a UL graduate and US native who works alongside Molly in the BDS committee, also feels his desire to work for the people who are not able to do all the things he can is a major motivating factor. “When there’s wars, when there’s violence, when there’s genocide, I feel like where I have the capacity, I have the duty to do something,” he says. “If I think about ‘why do I care?’ I care because I can’t imagine not caring”. But how do they deal with the uncertainty of knowing if their actions will make any difference? Molly and Ben say the argument that activism does not do anything is used to tumble its legitimacy, especially by “those who benefit from activists not protesting”. Molly recalls following a week of student protests, Trinity College Dublin decided to cut all of its ties with Israel. Speaking of her Palestinian doctor friend, she says that just “showing up to (a) protest made that man’s whole day”. She admits, however, that weighing head-first into a cause can be exhausting. “Burning yourself out over something isn’t going to make you better at it,” she says, suggesting a measured approach. “You need to give yourself time and space to be able to do the things that you need to do, or you’re never going to be able to do them right”. For Alice Abreu, taking care of oneself means taking care of others. She identifies her activism with love. “It’s everything about others, about the Earth, about myself, and then realising that everything is so connected in a way that there’s no way I can care for myself and not care for others,” she says. This story is part of the Tell Your Own Story (TYOS) project. Published monthly, in collaboration with the Limerick Post, TYOS shares the stories of Limerick people of all backgrounds and abilities in the hopes of encouraging unity in diversity. For more information, visit tyos.ie.The reigning Super Bowl champions saw their run of 15 straight wins ended by the Buffalo Bills last week. The Kansas City Chiefs bounced back from their first defeat of the season with a dramatic 30-27 win over the Carolina Panthers. The reigning Super Bowl champions saw their run of 15 straight wins ended by the Buffalo Bills last week, but got back to winning ways thanks to star quarterback Patrick Mahomes. After a late Chuba Hubbard touchdown and two-point conversion had made it 27-27, the Chiefs got the ball back with less than two minutes on the clock and a 33-yard run from Mahomes helped set up Spencer Shrader for a game-winning field goal. Mahomes finished the game with 269 yards and three touchdowns, two of them to Noah Gray in the first half. Running back Jahmyr Gibbs scored two touchdowns as the Detroit Lions beat the Indianapolis Colts 24-6 to improve their record to 10-1, matching that of the Chiefs. David Montgomery also ran for a score before having to leave the game with a shoulder injury. The Tampa Bay Buccaneers ended a four-game losing streak with a 30-7 win over the New York Giants, who “mutually agreed” to terminate the contract of quarterback Daniel Jones earlier this week. Jones’ replacement Tommy DeVito was sacked four times while opposite number Baker Mayfield ran for a touchdown and completed 24 of 30 pass attempts for 294 yards. Rachaad White, Bucky Irving and Sean Tucker also ran for touchdowns in a one-sided contest. The Dallas Cowboys ended their five-game losing streak with a remarkable 34-26 win over the Washington Commanders, with 30 points scored in the final three minutes. KaVontae Turpin’s 99-yard kick-off return for a touchdown looked to have sealed victory for the Cowboys, only for the Commanders to respond with a field goal before getting the ball back with 33 seconds remaining. Wide receiver Terry McLaurin sprinted 86 yards through the Dallas defence for a touchdown, only for Austin Seibert to miss the extra point. The Commanders tried an onside kick and Juanyeh Thomas returned it 43 yards for a touchdown. Quarterback Tua Tagovailoa threw four touchdown passes as the Miami Dolphins cruised to a 34-15 win over the New England Patriots, while the Tennessee Titans pulled off a surprise 32-27 victory at the Houston Texans. The Minnesota Vikings improved to 9-2 thanks to a 30-27 overtime win against the Chicago Bears, Parker Romo kicking the decisive field goal from 29 yards.Wake up the ghosts! Texas, Texas A&M rivalry that dates to 1894 is reborn

Warren Buffett Gifts $1.1 Bn in Berkshire Hathaway Stock, Names Successors for His $147 Bn Fortune

Previous: percy jackson blackjack
Next: to play blackjack